Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



U.K. 10-Year Note Auction YieldA:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Leading Index MoM (Dec)A:--
F: --
U.S. MBA Mortgage Application Activity Index WoWA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PPI YoY (Excl. Food, Energy & Trade) (Oct)A:--
F: --
U.S. PPI MoM Final (Excl. Food, Energy and Trade) (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
U.S. Core PPI YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. PPI MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. PPI YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. Current Account (Q3)A:--
F: --
U.S. Retail Sales YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Retail Sales (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core Retail Sales MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. Retail Sales MoM (Excl. Automobile) (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. Core Retail Sales (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Retail Sales MoM (Excl. Gas Stations & Vehicle Dealers) (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. Retail Sales MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. Core PPI MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
Philadelphia Fed President Henry Paulson delivers a speech
U.S. Commercial Inventory MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
U.S. Existing Home Sales Annualized Total (Dec)A:--
F: --
U.S. Existing Home Sales Annualized MoM (Dec)A:--
F: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Cushing, Oklahoma Crude Oil Stocks ChangeA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Stocks ChangeA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Gasoline Stocks ChangeA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Demand Projected by ProductionA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Oil Imports ChangesA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Heating Oil Stock ChangesA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Refinitiv/Ipsos Primary Consumer Sentiment Index (PCSI) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland M2 Money Supply YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland M0 Money Supply YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland M1 Money Supply YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Domestic Enterprise Commodity Price Index YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Domestic Enterprise Commodity Price Index MoM (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Japan PPI MoM (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Australia Consumer Inflation Expectations (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. 3-Month RICS House Price Balance (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
South Korea Benchmark Interest Rate--
F: --
P: --
Saudi Arabia CPI YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services Index MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services Index YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing Output MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Monthly GDP 3M/3M Change (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. GDP MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Industrial Output MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance Non-EU (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing Output YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Construction Output MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Industrial Output YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services Index MoM--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Construction Output YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. GDP YoY (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance EU (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
France HICP Final MoM (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Annual GDP Growth--
F: --
Italy Industrial Output YoY (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Existing Home Sales MoM (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
















































No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
President Trump's proposal to annex Greenland sparks bipartisan U.S. outrage, with critics warning it could unravel NATO and provoke European allies.
President Donald Trump's proposal to annex Greenland has sparked sharp criticism across the U.S. political spectrum, with one Republican lawmaker branding the idea "weapons-grade stupid." The move is not just seen as unconventional—it's being framed as a direct threat to the NATO alliance itself.
Concerns are mounting that a U.S. attempt to seize Greenland would unravel the decades-old military pact. Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, warned that such an action could trigger a military confrontation between the United States and its European allies.
"NATO would have an obligation to defend Greenland," Murphy stated. "And so, query whether we would be at war with Europe, with England, with France."
This view was echoed by Senator Mark Warner, the Democratic vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Warner highlighted Greenland's strategic importance and the existing treaty that allows the U.S. significant military latitude on the island.
"If he were to take an action against Greenland, that would completely destroy NATO," Warner said.
Even Republicans have voiced alarm. Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana dismissed the proposal as "weapons-grade stupid," signaling bipartisan unease with the president's rhetoric.
Trump, a former real estate developer, has compared acquiring Greenland to a massive property transaction. He has consistently argued that the United States "needs" to control the semi-autonomous Danish territory, despite a 1951 treaty already giving Washington broad military access.
"It's so strategic," Trump told reporters, claiming, "Right now, Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place. We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security."
The president recently intensified his calls, suggesting he is prepared to use pressure to secure the territory.
"We are going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not because if we don't do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland," Trump said. "I would like to make a deal the easy way, but if we don't do it the easy way, we're going to do it the hard way."
Trump also appeared to question the legitimacy of Denmark's historical claim to the island, which covers 836,000 square miles and has been under Danish control since 1721. "The fact that they had a boat land there 500 years ago doesn't mean they own the land," he remarked.
European leaders have rallied behind Denmark. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has voiced concerns that an American takeover would effectively end NATO. In response to U.S. security arguments, several NATO members, including the UK and Germany, have started discussions about increasing their own military presence in Greenland.
According to a Bloomberg report, Germany has even proposed a joint NATO mission to protect Greenland and the broader Arctic region. Critically, NATO allies have pushed back on Trump's assertion that Russian and Chinese vessels are operating routinely in the area.
The controversy strikes at the heart of the NATO charter. Formed over 75 years ago, the alliance is built on the principle of mutual defense: an attack on one member is an attack on all. This commitment, outlined in Article 5, has been a cornerstone of transatlantic stability.
Ironically, Article 5 has only been invoked once in history—in defense of the United States following the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
As NATO's own website explains, its "essential and enduring purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of all its members." That mandate includes defending Greenland from foreign invasion or annexation, regardless of the source.

A U.S. federal judge on Tuesday urged the Trump administration to resolve a "bureaucratic mess" by issuing a student visa to a college student who was deported to Honduras after being arrested at Boston's airport while trying to visit her family for Thanksgiving.
U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns during a hearing in Boston raised that prospect as a "practical solution" to how to resolve a lawsuit by Any Lucia Lopez Belloza, a 19-year-old student at Babson College who was sent to Honduras in violation of a court order.
Lopez Belloza, who was brought to the U.S. from Honduras by her parents when she was 8, was arrested on November 20 based on a removal order she says she did not know existed.
Her lawyer filed a lawsuit challenging her detention the next day.
A federal judge in Massachusetts issued an order on November 21 barring Lopez Belloza from being deported or transferred out of Massachusetts for 72 hours.
But by that time, Lopez Belloza had already been flown to Texas, potentially stripping Stearns' court of jurisdiction. She was flown to Honduras on November 22.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Sauter acknowledged the court's order was violated, a development he blamed on a "mistake" by an officer with Immigration and Customs Enforcement who thought the order no longer applied and failed to properly flag it.
"On behalf of the government, we want to sincerely apologize," Sauter said.
He said there were no grounds to hold anyone in contempt, however. He called it a rare instance of the government not following an order in the over 700 cases filed in Massachusetts by migrants challenging their detention since President Donald Trump took office last year with a hardline immigration agenda.
Stearns, who was appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton, commended Sauter for acknowledging the mistake and asked what the remedy should be, saying "we don't want to lose sight that we have a real human being here."
Todd Pomerleau, Lopez Belloza's lawyer, urged Stearns to order the government to facilitate the return of his client and to hold officials in contempt.
"The rule of law ought to matter," Pomerleau said.
Stearns did not immediately rule. But he floated an alternative, recommending the State Department issue Lopez Belloza a student visa allowing her to finish her studies.
"We all recognize a mistake was made," Stearns said. "She's a very sympathetic person, and there should be some means to addressing this."
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia President Anna Paulson has reaffirmed her view that interest rate cuts could be on the table later this year, citing recent inflation data that supports her "cautious optimism."
Speaking at an event with the Chamber of Commerce for Greater Philadelphia, Paulson outlined a scenario where inflation continues to cool while the economy remains stable.
"I am feeling cautiously optimistic on inflation, and I see a decent chance that we will end the year with inflation that is close to 2% on a run-rate basis," she stated.
Paulson clarified that any policy adjustments would depend on key economic indicators aligning with projections.
"I see inflation moderating, the labor market stabilizing and growth coming in around 2% this year," she explained. "If all of that happens, then some modest further adjustments to the funds rate would likely be appropriate later in the year."
Her stance aligns with several other Fed policymakers who have favored holding rates steady since the central bank's December meeting to better assess the economic outlook. According to projections released in December, the median official anticipates three quarter-point cuts in 2025, followed by a single cut in 2026.
The latest consumer price data showed inflation at 2.7% for the year through December. While some Fed officials worry about inflation remaining above the 2% target for an extended period, others are focused on signs of weakening job growth.
Paulson emphasized that she is closely monitoring employment trends. "Labor market risks have risen and that has been an important factor in my support for the 75 basis points of cuts that the FOMC did last year," she said. "I will be monitoring labor market developments closely."
She also noted that while many businesses have raised prices in response to tariffs, these pressures are largely concentrated in the goods sector. Paulson described the easing of services inflation as "encouraging" and called recent data on housing inflation "unambiguously good."




German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil has issued a stark warning: Europe must adopt a more assertive economic posture or risk becoming a "pawn of the major powers" in a turbulent global landscape.
Speaking at a DIW Institute event in Berlin, Klingbeil argued that the foundational U.S.-led transatlantic alliance, which has long underpinned European prosperity, is fundamentally breaking apart. He noted that the increasing use of trade policy as a weapon is placing an "extreme burden" on Germany's export-dependent economy.
Klingbeil, a co-leader of the Social Democrats and deputy to Chancellor Friedrich Merz, emphasized that Europe can no longer afford to be "naive and blind" about its relationship with the United States. His conviction was strengthened during a recent visit to Washington.
"I believe... that the transatlantic alliance is undergoing a far more profound transformation than we have been willing to admit," he stated. "The transatlantic relationship as we have known it is dissolving."
While he described a recent dinner conversation with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent as positive, the overall message was one of urgent realism. To navigate this "new world," Klingbeil insisted the EU "must not shy away from tougher, more far-reaching measures where we are under pressure."
Klingbeil pointed to existing EU levies on Chinese-made vehicles and steel as examples of the necessary assertiveness Europe must embrace. He stressed that international competitors are actively undermining the continent's economic strength.
"Our competition is not sleeping; it is deliberately attacking our competitiveness," he said. "And that is why I say: We must assert ourselves more strongly than before."
This strategic reevaluation has become a top priority for the ruling coalition of Merz's conservatives and Klingbeil's SPD, which came to office in May. The government has been forced to reassess its ties with major trading partners, including the U.S. and China, as they adopt increasingly protectionist policies.
The urgency of this geopolitical shift is underscored by Germany's own economic challenges. The federal statistics office is set to release its first estimate for 2025 GDP, with economists forecasting meager annual growth of just 0.2%.
This would mark the first expansion since 2022, following two years of contraction. GDP is projected to grow by approximately 1% this year, as government stimulus measures begin to take hold.
To counter the slowdown, Klingbeil highlighted his government's aggressive domestic strategy. "We have launched the largest investment offensive in our country's history," he explained. "With €500 billion for infrastructure and at least as much again for defense, we're providing a strong government stimulus."
These efforts, which also include a package of corporate tax incentives, are part of the government's push to revive Europe's largest economy amid unprecedented global challenges.
A change in leadership could unlock a dramatic resurgence in Venezuela's oil industry, with a new forecast predicting crude output could surge by roughly 50% over the next decade. According to industry consultant Enverus, this would mark a significant return for the Caribbean nation, home to some of the world's largest crude reserves, to the global energy market.
Enverus, one of the oil industry's premier forecasting firms, projects that production could reach approximately 1.5 million barrels a day by 2035. This analysis is among the first to model a post-Maduro oil landscape for Venezuela.
The potential for growth is substantial. If political stability and investment conditions improve, Enverus outlines a high-case scenario where Venezuela's total output could climb to 3 million barrels a day by 2035.
A comeback of this scale faces significant hurdles. Venezuela's recent output has fluctuated near 1 million barrels per day, far below its 1970s peak of almost 4 million barrels. Reviving the industry would require companies to rebuild or replace abandoned rigs, repair leaky pipelines, and restore fire-ravaged equipment.
Beyond infrastructure, oil executives are seeking clear legal frameworks, guarantees for their investments, and security for their employees before committing capital.
President Donald Trump has called on US oil companies to channel at least $100 billion into reviving Venezuela's energy sector. Following a White House meeting with nearly 20 industry representatives, it's clear that while the opportunity is recognized, major players are proceeding with caution.
Exxon Mobil Corp. Chief Executive Darren Woods told Trump that the South American country is currently "uninvestable," a sentiment that echoes warnings from other industry leaders. However, Woods also expressed confidence that the Trump administration could deliver the legal and regulatory reforms needed for any future investment.
For now, Exxon's arch-rival, Chevron Corp., remains the only major international oil company with active operations in Venezuela.
While producers deliberate, oil traders and US refiners are already positioning themselves for access to Venezuelan crude. Trump has said Venezuela will relinquish as much as 50 million barrels of its oil for the US to sell, and trading houses Trafigura Group and Vitol Group are preparing to move the crude. The sudden availability of 50 million barrels would represent one of the largest unexpected supply flows in years.
Short-Term Glut vs. Long-Term Deficit
Despite the potential influx, Enverus expects the added barrels will not greatly impact the price of Brent, the global crude benchmark. The market is already grappling with a forecast glut for this year, which is expected to transition into supply shortfalls later in the decade.
"Even with accelerated sanctions relief, we still see 1–2 million barrels per day of global oversupply in the first half of 2026 and limited incremental volumes from Venezuela," said Al Salazar, head of macro research at Enverus.
The long-term outlook is different. "Long-term global oil balances are projected to face a deficit of 2 million barrels per day by 2035, creating space for Venezuela's incremental supply without materially impacting prices," Enverus concluded.
A U.S. official said Wednesday that the United States is withdrawing some personnel from bases in the Middle East. This comes after a senior Iranian official said that Tehran had warned its neighbors that Iran would also strike U.S. bases if Washington launches an attack.
Iran’s leadership is struggling to quell the worst domestic unrest in the history of the Islamic Republic, as Tehran tries to block repeated threats from US President Donald Trump to intervene on behalf of anti-government protesters.
An unnamed U.S. official said that, out of caution, the U.S. is withdrawing some personnel from key bases in the region, given the escalating tensions.
Three diplomats said some personnel have been advised to leave the region’s main U.S. air base in Qatar, although there are no immediate signs of a large-scale troop evacuation, as happened hours before last year’s Iranian missile attack.
Trump has repeatedly threatened to intervene in the situation in Iran in support of protesters. In Iran, authorities have reportedly cracked down on protests against clerical rule, resulting in thousands of deaths.
Iran and its Western adversaries have described the unrest as the most violent since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The unrest, which began two weeks ago as demonstrations protesting dire economic conditions, has escalated rapidly in recent days. The Islamic Revolution established a theocratic regime in Iran.
An Iranian official said the death toll had exceeded 2,000, while a human rights organization said it had surpassed 2,600.
Iranian Armed Forces Chief of Staff Abdulrahim Mousavi said on Wednesday that Iran "has never faced such massive destruction," blaming it on foreign enemies. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrow called it "the most brutal repression in contemporary Iranian history."
An Israeli official said that, according to Israeli assessments, Trump has decided to intervene, but the scope and timing of the intervention remain unclear.
The three diplomats told Reuters that some personnel had been told to leave the U.S. Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar by Wednesday night.
One diplomat described the move as a “posture change” rather than an “ordered withdrawal.” There was no indication that troops were being moved to nearby football fields and shopping malls as they had last June, hours before Iran launched missiles at the base in retaliation for a U.S. airstrike.
The U.S. Embassy in Doha has not yet commented on the matter, and the Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Iranian authorities accused the United States and Israel of instigating the unrest, claiming it was carried out by what Iran calls terrorists.
Map of US military facilities in the Middle East.Trump has been publicly threatening to intervene in Iran for days, but has yet to provide any specific details.
On Tuesday, in an interview with CBS News, Trump vowed that the United States would take "very strong action" if Iran executed protesters. He also urged the Iranian people to continue their protests and take over government institutions, declaring that "aid is coming."
A senior Iranian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that Tehran has asked U.S. allies in the region to stop Washington from attacking Iran.
The official stated, "Tehran has told regional countries, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Turkey, that if the United States launches an attack on Iran, U.S. bases in those countries will be attacked."
The official added that direct contact between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and U.S. envoy Steve Witkov has been suspended.
The United States has deployed multiple forces in the region, including the forward headquarters of the Central Command in Al Udeid, Qatar, and the headquarters of the U.S. Fifth Fleet in Bahrain.
The flow of information within Iran has been hampered due to the internet outage.
HRANA, a U.S.-based human rights organization, says it has confirmed 2,403 deaths of protesters and 147 government-affiliated individuals to date, a number far exceeding the death tolls in previous waves of protests in 2022 and 2009 when authorities cracked down on them.
In June, Israel and the United States launched a 12-day airstrike against Iran, severely damaging the Iranian government's prestige. This followed setbacks for Iran's regional allies in Lebanon and Syria. European countries then initiated the process of restoring UN sanctions on Iran's nuclear program, exacerbating Iran's economic crisis.
A Western official said the massive unrest caught the authorities off guard during a vulnerable period, but the government does not appear to be facing imminent collapse, and its security agencies remain in control.
The authorities attempted to demonstrate that they still enjoyed public support. Iranian state television broadcast footage of massive funeral processions in Tehran, Isfahan, Bushehr, and other cities to mourn those who died in the riots. People waved flags and images of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and held up signs with anti-riot slogans.
President Masoud Pezeshkian is an elected figure whose power is subordinate to Khamenei. In a cabinet meeting, he stated that as long as the government has the support of the people, "all the enemies' attempts against the country will be futile."
Iranian state media reported that Ali Larijani, head of Iran's top security agency, spoke by phone with the Qatari foreign minister, while Araghchi spoke separately with his counterparts in the UAE and Turkey.
Aragh told UAE Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed that "the situation has calmed down" and that the Iranian people are determined to defend their national sovereignty and security from foreign interference.
During a visit to a Tehran prison holding arrested protesters, Iran's chief justice stated that swift trials and punishments of those who "behead or burn others" are crucial to ensuring such incidents do not recur.
According to the Human Rights Activists Association (HRANA), 18,137 people have been arrested so far.
The Iranian Kurdish human rights organization Hengaw reported that a 26-year-old man, Erfan Soltani, was arrested for participating in protests in Karaj and was scheduled to be executed on Wednesday. The organization stated on Wednesday that it could not yet confirm whether the sentence had been carried out.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features

FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up