Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Expectations Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Coincident Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Lagging Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi delivers a speech
Germany Ifo Business Expectations Index (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany IFO Business Climate Index (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Current Business Situation Index (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Brazil Current Account (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Unemployment Rate (Not SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada National Economic Confidence IndexA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl.Transport) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. Chicago Fed National Activity Index (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. Dallas Fed New Orders Index (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed General Business Activity Index (Jan)A:--
F: --
U.S. 2-Year Note Auction Avg. YieldA:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BRC Shop Price Index YoY (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Industrial Profit YoY (YTD) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany 2-Year Schatz Auction Avg. Yield--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Trade Balance (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Redbook Index YoY--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index YoY (Not SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 10-City Home Price Index YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 10-City Home Price Index MoM (Not SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index (Not SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index MoM (Not SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Composite Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Present Situation Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Expectations Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Shipments Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Services Revenue Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. 5-Year Note Auction Avg. Yield--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Refined Oil Stocks--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Crude Oil Stocks--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Gasoline Stocks--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Cushing Crude Oil Stocks--
F: --
P: --
Australia RBA Trimmed Mean CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI QoQ (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Germany GfK Consumer Confidence Index (SA) (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
Germany 10-Year Bund Auction Avg. Yield--
F: --
P: --
India Industrial Production Index YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
India Manufacturing Output MoM (Dec)--
F: --
P: --














































No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
South Korea pushes a $350B US investment bill to counter Trump's tariff threats over a stalled trade deal.
South Korea’s Finance Minister, Koo Yun-cheol, is set to urge lawmakers to fast-track a $350 billion U.S. investment bill following a threat from President Donald Trump to increase tariffs on South Korean automobiles.
The move comes just hours after Trump announced potential tariff hikes not only on cars but also on South Korean lumber and pharmaceuticals, citing the country's failure to ratify a trade agreement with Washington.
In a social media post, President Trump declared his intention to raise tariffs on a range of South Korean goods. He specifically flagged an increase on auto tariffs from 15% to 25%.
"South Korea's Legislature is not living up to its Deal with the United States," Trump wrote. He stated that because the legislature had not enacted their "Historic Trade Agreement," he was increasing tariffs on autos, lumber, and pharmaceuticals to 25%.
In response, South Korea's Finance Ministry announced that Minister Koo Yun-cheol will meet with Lim Lee-ja, the head of the National Assembly's finance committee, to push for the bill's passage. The proposed legislation has been stalled in the committee since its submission in December.
"We are currently assessing the U.S. side's intentions," the finance ministry said in a statement. "We will communicate with the U.S. government, including by explaining the status of the bill's discussion in the National Assembly."
The ministry added that it would continue to actively consult with the National Assembly on the matter.
The threat from Washington sent immediate ripples through South Korea's stock market. In morning trading, shares of Hyundai Motor fell by more than 2%, while Kia's stock price dropped by over 3%.

The stock of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) has been a market leader and remains strong. It is hovering near prior highs around $267. AMD is a leading semiconductor firm specializing in high-performance CPUs, GPUs, and adaptive computer solutions for data centers and gaming. The company competes with Intel (INTC) and Nvidia (NVDA) with innovations like MI300 AI accelerators. In 2025, AMD stock advanced by 77%, and as of Monday's closing price, it was up by 17.3% year-to-date. Earnings are reported next week.
AMD weekly chart showing that a long term base breakout attempt remains in progress. Source: TradingView as of Jan 26, 2026.An attempt to further the advance in AMD stock has been underway following a new record high breakout to $267.08 in October. The first pullback culminated with a higher swing low of $194.28 and a seven-month consolidation bottom phase. During the related consolidation period trend support was recognized near the 20-week average. Last week's the bulls failed to breakout to a new record high as a top was hit at $266.96, very close to the prior high, before weakening on Monday.
AMD daily chart showing a bounce off solid dynamic support. Source: TradingView as of Jan 26, 2026.Following a pullback from last week's high, the bull structure in AMD shows a likely continuation into new highs. The daily chart confirms underlying strength with faster moving averages rising above the 50-day average recently. Support for the recent pullback was confirmed near the long-term 200-day average. Moreover, a rising channel outlines the price movement within the uptrend, showing the potential for higher prices as the top of the channel is a potential target. A bounce from the lower boundary of the channel improves the possibility of AMD eventually approaching the top boundary line.
Last week's low of $225.41 is considered the maximum downside for support to hold while maintaining a short-term bullish structure. It remains possible that AMD trades range-bound for a period before another breakout attempt. However, signs of strength following tests of key support levels may signal the potential for a renewed advance toward the $267.08 high.
The 38.2% Fibonacci retracement of the prior advance is located at $241.30, while the rising 10-day average is currently near $236. A deeper pullback would bring the 50% retracement into focus at $233.48, which closely aligns with the top of a seven-week consolidation range near $234.02, reinforcing that zone as an important area of technical support.
China's industrial sector posted its first profit increase in three months, offering a sign of stability as persistent factory-gate deflation shows signs of letting up.
According to data from the National Bureau of Statistics, industrial profits climbed 5.3% in December from a year earlier. This marks a significant turnaround from the more than 13% plunge recorded in November and soundly beats Bloomberg Economics' forecast of an 11% drop.
For the full year, industrial earnings rose 0.6%, the first annual gain since 2021. This metric is a key indicator of the financial health of China's factories, mines, and utilities, and it often influences their investment decisions in the quarters ahead.
Despite the year-end recovery, profit margins have been consistently squeezed by weak domestic demand. Government efforts to manage excess competition and reduce overcapacity have yet to fully resolve these pressures. While the broader economy lost momentum in the last quarter, industrial production remained resilient, largely supported by strong export performance.
The core challenge for China's manufacturing-dominated industry has been domestic deflation, which erodes both revenue and profits. Producer prices have been falling for over three years, but December saw the smallest year-on-year decrease in over twelve months, providing some relief to companies.
These deflationary pressures emerged after the pandemic, driven by a prolonged slump in the housing market and sluggish consumer spending. At the same time, a glut of production capacity in certain industries has created an oversupply, forcing firms to slash prices to stay competitive.

US natural gas prices continued their rally yesterday, with front-month Henry Hub settling almost 29% at $6.80/MMBtu. This takes the total gains since 19 January to almost 120%. Yet the move in US natural gas is even more astonishing when looking at the spot Henry Hub price, which briefly broke above $30/MMBtu in recent days. It's been driven by a severe winter storm across the US. This is impacting natural gas production and boosting heating demand. The storm is estimated to have hit around 11% of US natural gas production. The key question for the outlook, obviously, is how long this disruption lasts. There are some signs that production is already recovering, with gas output from the Permian estimated to be up 11% day-on-day yesterday. If this trend continues, it suggests prices have likely peaked.
Developments in the US natural gas market remain a concern for the European market, as supply disruptions could weigh on US LNG exports to Europe. In recent days, US LNG plants have significantly reduced their gas intake, estimated at around 48%, which will translate into reduced LNG exports from these plants. TTF continues to trade at a healthy premium to Asian LNG to ensure LNG cargoes move into Europe, where storage has now fallen below 45% full. It's looking increasingly likely that storage will end the 25/26 heating season at below 25% full. This would also be below the levels seen in 2022. The difference between 2022 and 2026 is that we are currently seeing significant LNG supply ramp-ups, which should help soothe supply concerns to some extent.
Oil prices settled lower yesterday, with ICE Brent closing down more than 0.4%. The US winter storm should also support demand for heating fuels, as reflected in the heating oil crack. Freezing conditions will disrupt US oil output. The weather has also affected refinery operations. So, refinery run rates have fallen in recent days.
There are also signs that the honeymoon phase between the US and the new Venezuelan leader may be coming to an end, with President Delcy Rodriguez saying Venezuela has had enough of US interference. While these comments may be more for internal consumption, they are certainly worth keeping an eye on, as they could alter the outlook for Venezuelan oil supply.
Kazakhstan's oil output is set to recover, with Tengizchevroil restoring power to its Tengiz field. Operations at the Tengiz and Korolev fields, which produced around 890k b/d over the first three quarters of 2025, were halted last week due to power issues. Meanwhile, the completion of repair work at the CPC terminal should also support a recovery in export flows. A recovery in these flows should improve availability in the prompt market, putting some pressure on the Brent prompt spread, which has strengthened significantly through January. The strength in timespreads has been at odds with estimates for a large oil surplus.
Silver surged more than 12% in its biggest one-day jump since 2008, hitting a new record above $110/oz, before giving back some of these gains. The rally reflects both its precious metal appeal and tightening physical conditions: inventories remain low, lease rates are elevated, and the market has entered yet another year of supply deficits. Prices are now up around 60% year‑to‑date after a nearly 150% surge in 2025. Yet risks remain, with high prices potentially triggering industrial demand destruction and silver's tendency to overshoot, keeping volatility high. The gold–silver ratio has now slipped below 50, its lowest level since 2011, underscoring silver's dramatic outperformance.
Gold also extended its rally above $5,100/oz at one stage yesterday. It was supported by Federal Reserve rate cut expectations, a weaker dollar and persistent geopolitical risks. With the central bank buying holding strong and real rates likely heading lower, the medium-term outlook remains favourable. As political uncertainty elevated, from President Trump‑driven policy surprises to a new Fed chair to the US midterm elections later this year, gold should continue to find investor support.
Former US President Donald Trump has signaled a potential tariff hike to 25% on goods imported from South Korea. He cited the Korean legislature's alleged failure to finalize a trade agreement concluded with the United States last year as the primary reason for the move.
The current tariff rate on South Korean exports under the existing agreement is 15%. In a social media post on Monday, January 26, Trump stated the increased tariff would apply to sectors including cars, lumber, and pharmaceuticals, among other "Reciprocal TARIFFS."
Trump claimed that South Korea's legislature is not honoring its side of the trade deal. "In each of these Deals, we have acted quickly to lower our TARIFFS as agreed," he stated. "We expect our Trading Partners to do the same."
Analysts immediately weighed in, warning that such a tariff increase could severely impact major South Korean companies. Hyundai Motor Co., for example, shipped 1.1 million cars to the U.S. in 2024 and would be significantly affected by the change.
It is important to note, however, that the administration has not issued any official notice authorizing the execution of these suggested tariff amendments.
Reports suggest this move is part of a broader strategy by Trump to escalate trade tensions with key U.S. allies. His statements targeting South Korea are consistent with other recent threats made against major trading partners.
Canada and Europe Targeted
Trump has also signaled plans to impose 100% tariffs on Canadian products if the country finalizes a trade agreement with China.
Furthermore, he has indicated that he is considering new tariffs on goods from Europe. This consideration is reportedly in line with his strategic focus on Greenland, the world's largest island and a territory within the Kingdom of Denmark.
Sanctions Pressure via Iran
To intensify pressure on Tehran amid anti-government protests, Trump also announced his intention to impose tariffs on exports from any nation that trades with Iran. This tactic uses secondary sanctions to isolate the Iranian government.
While Trump’s trade policies create global market uncertainty, their long-term viability faces significant challenges within the United States.
Supreme Court Scrutiny
Analysts note that an upcoming Supreme Court decision could render these latest tariff threats insignificant. If the court rules against him, Trump's ability to unilaterally adjust import taxes could be restricted. A hearing on the matter is scheduled for February 20 of this year.
Public and Party Concerns
Recent polls suggest that many Americans are frustrated with Trump's leadership approach, a sentiment observed ahead of the midterm elections scheduled for Tuesday, November 3, 2026.
Even the former president's allies have reportedly raised concerns about his high-pressure tactics. They have pointed to his interest in Greenland, a fatal shooting by federal agents during an immigration crackdown in Minneapolis, and a US military operation that resulted in the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Some allies have argued that Trump should soften his hardline stance, particularly on deportation.



China's Anta Sports Products (2020.HK) said on Tuesday it would buy a 29.06% stake in Puma (PUMG.DE) from the Pinault family for 1.51 billion euros ($1.79 billion), making it the biggest shareholder in the German sportswear maker.
The Hong Kong-listed company will pay 35 euros per share in cash for 43 million Puma shares, Anta said in a stock exchange filing. The price is a 62% premium to Puma's 21.63 euros closing share price on Monday, up nearly 17% in the session.
Reuters was the first to report the deal earlier this month.
Anta said it believed Puma could increase its international competitiveness and build its brand recognition with the Chinese company as its largest investor.
It said Anta would seek Puma board seats once the deal was finalised.
"Its (Puma) global business footprint and focused positioning in sports categories are highly complementary to the group's existing multi-brand and specialised business," Anta said in a statement.
Anta has a track record of acquiring and revamping Western sports and lifestyle brands, and in 2019, it led a consortium to buy Amer Sports, owner of racquet maker Wilson and mountain sports specialist Salomon.
Reuters reported in early January Anta had offered to buy about 29% of Puma from the Pinault family and had secured financing for the acquisition, although talks had at the time stalled over valuation.
The transaction comes as the German sportswear group struggles to revive sales and investor confidence under its new CEO, Arthur Hoeld.
Artemis, run by Francois-Henri Pinault, chairman of luxury group Kering (PRTP.PA), had previously described its Puma stake as non-strategic. The Pinault family acquired the holding from Kering in 2018, when the group repositioned itself as a pure luxury player.
Puma has been under pressure as demand weakened, and recent sneaker launches, including the Speedcat, failed to generate the momentum executives had hoped for. Hoeld, who took over last year, has outlined a turnaround focused on brand heat, performance products, and cost discipline.
The deal is subject to antitrust clearances, shareholder approval at Anta, and regulatory approvals in China and other jurisdictions. Anta said it expects to convene an extraordinary general meeting, with closing targeted after conditions are met.
($1 = 0.8421 euros)
Despite persistent US pressure and sanctions, India's appetite for discounted Russian oil has proven remarkably resilient. While market watchers once predicted a sharp drop-off, a new status quo suggests these significant crude flows could continue well into 2026, driven by compelling economics for New Delhi.
Indian Oil Minister Hardeep Puri recently highlighted the complex global energy landscape, noting that despite an abundance of supply, the world has "become more challenging." Speaking ahead of a major energy summit in Goa, Puri emphasized that market dynamics ultimately determine India's purchasing decisions—a clear signal that price remains a top priority.
This places the dilemma over Russian crude at the center of upcoming discussions, alongside topics like the global gas supply surge and a renewed interest in nuclear energy.
Washington's efforts to curb Moscow's oil revenue have certainly had an impact. Before Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, India sourced most of its crude from the Middle East. In recent months, there has been a partial return to these traditional suppliers as a way to rebalance its import portfolio.
State-owned Bharat Petroleum Corp. (BPCL), for instance, has issued tenders for long-term supplies of Abu Dhabi's Murban, Iraqi Basrah, and Omani crude. Meanwhile, Indian Oil Corp. (IOC) has increased its purchases on the spot market.
However, the allure of cheap Russian oil is difficult to ignore. As US sanctions on major Russian producers cause the price of benchmark Urals crude to fall, Indian refiners are finding the discounts irresistible. Even the typically conservative Reliance Industries Ltd. has placed new orders for non-sanctioned Russian cargoes, joining IOC, BPCL, and the sanctioned refiner Nayara Energy Ltd. in continuing these purchases.
Market experts believe that while the volume of Russian oil heading to India may have dipped from its peak, it is unlikely to disappear.
"We know that oil will always find a way," said Arne Lohmann Rasmussen, chief analyst at A/S Global Risk Management. He noted that while US sanctions and EU bans are affecting the market, he "strongly doubt[s] that India will give up importing Russian oil."
At its highest point, India imported over 2 million barrels of Russian crude per day. That figure fell to around 1.3 million barrels per day in December and is expected to hold steady this month. This is a far cry from the near-zero levels some analysts predicted in October after the US blacklisted Russian energy giants Rosneft PJSC and Lukoil PJSC.
Naveen Das, a senior crude oil analyst at Kpler Ltd., predicts India will "maintain a healthy baseload of Russian crude." He expects this to be part of a broader strategy that includes expanding deals with Middle Eastern suppliers and exploring new opportunities, such as non-sanctioned Venezuelan oil.
"India will continue to look out for the best prices and best margins for its refiners, strategically changing its buying slate," Das added.
Beyond direct disruptions to Russia's export capabilities, such as Ukrainian attacks, only a few key factors could significantly alter India's current approach:
• A US-India Trade Deal: If a comprehensive trade agreement is signed, New Delhi might adopt a more cautious stance on Russian imports to align with its strategic partner. Former US President Donald Trump recently mentioned a "good trade deal" was forthcoming, but offered no specifics.
• Geopolitical Diversification: India is keen to cultivate trade and political ties beyond its long-standing relationship with Russia. As its refining capacity is forecast to grow from 258 million to 309.5 million tons a year by 2030, diversifying its energy sources is a strategic imperative. Puri noted that India now has 41 supply sources, up from 27 just a few years ago.
• A Global Oil Glut: The current oversupply in the global oil market gives India substantial leverage. Even without Russian discounts, India has plenty of other options available.
As one of the world's most important demand hubs, India is in a powerful negotiating position. "What is key to remember is that in a world of oversupplied oil currently... India is still one of the key demand hubs," explained Kpler's Das. This gives the country a "fair amount of optionality," meaning it won't be punished for adjusting its purchasing strategy as it sees fit.
These dynamics will be a central theme at India Energy Week, which runs from January 27 to January 30.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features
Log In
Sign Up