Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



Euro Zone Employment YoY (SA) (Q3)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone GDP Final YoY (Q3)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone GDP Final QoQ (Q3)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Employment Final QoQ (SA) (Q3)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Employment Final (SA) (Q3)A:--
F: --
Brazil PPI MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Consumer Confidence Index (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Unemployment Rate (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Labor Force Participation Rate (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Employment (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Part-Time Employment (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Full-time Employment (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Income MoM (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index YoY (SA) (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Outlays MoM (SA) (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 5-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Prelim YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Real Personal Consumption Expenditures MoM (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. 5-10 Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Prelim (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Prelim (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Prelim (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Expectations Index Prelim (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Unit Labor Cost Prelim (SA) (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Consumer Credit (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Foreign Exchange Reserves (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Exports YoY (USD) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Imports YoY (CNH) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Imports YoY (USD) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Imports (CNH) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Trade Balance (CNH) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Exports (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Wages MoM (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Trade Balance (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Nominal GDP Revised QoQ (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Trade Balance (Customs Data) (SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Japan GDP Annualized QoQ Revised (Q3)--
F: --
China, Mainland Exports YoY (CNH) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Trade Balance (USD) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Industrial Output MoM (SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Sentix Investor Confidence Index (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Leading Index MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada National Economic Confidence Index--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. 3-Year Note Auction Yield--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BRC Overall Retail Sales YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BRC Like-For-Like Retail Sales YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Australia Overnight (Borrowing) Key Rate--
F: --
P: --
RBA Rate Statement
RBA Press Conference
Germany Exports MoM (SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. NFIB Small Business Optimism Index (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Core CPI YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico 12-Month Inflation (CPI) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico PPI YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico CPI YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Redbook Index YoY--
F: --
P: --


No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
Bitcoin mining firm Cipher Mining's stock surged over 32% following the announcement of a significant 15-year partnership with technology giant Amazon Web Services.
Bitcoin mining firm Cipher Mining's stock surged over 32% following the announcement of a significant 15-year partnership with technology giant Amazon Web Services. This collaboration signals a growing trend of major tech companies actively engaging with the blockchain and crypto mining industry, highlighting the increasing integration of cryptocurrency with mainstream enterprise technology.
Bitcoin miners are increasingly diversifying beyond mere cryptocurrency production, venturing into AI and high-performance computing (HPC) sectors following the Bitcoin halving in April 2024. This shift aims to offset diminishing mining rewards, which now stand at 3.125 BTC per block, by offering additional services such as data hosting and AI project support.
In a notable development, Google acquired a 5.4% stake in Cipher Mining earlier this year, as part of a broader $3 billion, multi-year data center collaboration with AI infrastructure company Fluidstack. This partnership underscores the deepening ties between major technology firms and crypto miners, emphasizing the importance of blockchain technology within enterprise ecosystems.
Cipher CEO Tyler Page highlighted the significance of these alliances, stating, "Our recent transactions with Fluidstack and Google establish our credibility in the HPC space." He further remarked on the company's strategic move to secure its first direct lease with a Tier 1 hyperscaler, marking a pivotal step in their growth trajectory.
In addition to the Amazon deal, Cipher announced a majority stake in a joint venture to develop a 1-gigawatt AI hosting facility named Colchis in West Texas. Under this venture, Cipher will finance most of the project and hold a 95% ownership stake, positioning the company at the forefront of AI infrastructure expansion in the region.
Deals between crypto miners and tech giants are on the rise. For instance, Bitcoin miner IREN signed a multi-year GPU cloud services contract with Microsoft valued at nearly $10 billion. Similarly, TeraWulf announced a $3.7 billion hosting agreement with Fluidstack, supported by Google's parent company Alphabet, signifying a growing appetite for infrastructure partnerships in the crypto space.
This industry trend reflects a broader acceptance and integration of blockchain and crypto-related services within the mainstream tech sector, indicating that traditional technology companies see strategic value in establishing long-term relationships with miners and blockchain firms.
Poland plans to start building a national anti-drone system within months, without waiting for the European Union's "drone wall" initiative, the country's deputy defense minister said.
Cezary Tomczyk said the ministry would announce investments this month in technology for detecting, jamming and neutralizing hostile drones, as part of a wider air-defense program. He didn't say how much the investments would be worth, but the goal is for Polish companies to secure at least half of the contracts.
In September, NATO deployed fighter jets to shoot down about 20 drones that crossed into Polish territory during a massive Russian airstrike on Ukraine - the first such response since the full-scale invasion began in 2022. The incident exposed gaps in the country's defenses as it was forced to deploy expensive missiles against cheap unmanned aircraft.
"We agree with the idea of strengthening the defense of the skies over the entire European Union and are willing to consider external proposals or solutions," Tomczyk told Bloomberg News in an interview. "But we give priority to national projects."
The EU's drone wall can "complement" the Polish system in the future, he said. "If there're any external tools, we will use them to the fullest," according to the deputy minister.
Tomczyk said the ministry plans to use the EU's new SAFE defense loan program to finance the country's drone shield, but declined to provide details. Given its borders with Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, Poland got the biggest initial SAFE allocation, allowing it to tap into 43.7 billion euros ($50.8 billion) of funding.
The government wants the first new capabilities to be operational within three months of the announcements, and for the whole anti-drone system to be completed in two years.
"A counter-drone weapon must be comprehensive," Tomczyk said. "It should consist of various sensors and effectors operating simultaneously, first detecting and identifying objects, and then neutralizing them."
He added that the new anti-drone initiatives will become "another layer" of the country's air defense network, next to already deployed long- and medium-range systems. All these elements are meant to protect against a wide range of aerial threats, including aircraft, helicopters, drones, and cruise missiles.
In July, the defense ministry said it would spend 200 million zloty ($54.2 million) this year to buy combat and training drones. Warsaw has also sped up procurement procedures for the weapons.
"The way in which both Russians and Ukrainians are using unmanned weapon systems today shows that strengthening our capabilities in this area must be a priority in all spheres of activity: in the air, on land, and at sea," Tomczyk said.
New World Development Co and China Vanke Co, two of the most closely watched distressed Chinese property names, are again forcing investors to reckon with the fallout from the country's real estate crisis.
About two weeks after New World said it wasn't undertaking a liability management exercise, the Hong Kong distressed builder unveiled a US$1.9 billion (RM7.98 billion) bond swap plan that includes haircuts for creditors — particularly holders of its perpetual bonds.
Creditors are still parsing the details of the proposal but some of the company's perpetual notes made gains on Monday, including its US$700 million 4.8% perpetual bond, which saw its biggest daily jump in almost two years, rising 4 cents to 43 cents, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Meanwhile, some of Vanke's dollar bonds slumped after its largest shareholder tightened terms for loans to the company, a move that may signal a shift in government-led financial support. The builder's dollar bond due in November 2029 was poised for its biggest fall on record, according to Bloomberg-compiled prices.
The latest developments highlight deepening liquidity challenges facing highly leveraged developers in mainland China and Hong Kong, as weak sales persist despite government support measures. China's new-home sales extended a slump in October while, in Hong Kong, the commercial real estate continues to face challenges.
While New World's debt swap proposal means creditors would need to take haircuts ranging from 9% to as high as 50% and asks holders to forgo accrued interest on perpetual bonds, some analysts don't think it's a bad plan. The offered price is in line, or in some cases, higher than the secondary market levels of its bonds. The new notes would also give holders exposure to the builder's prized Victoria Dockside complex, giving them first-ranking access to the asset as collateral.
There is still a possibility that bondholders could negotiate with New World to improve the terms of the debt swap offer, such as asking for higher upfront cash or some accrued perpetual bond distribution payouts.
For the exchange offer to succeed, participation has to meet a minimum threshold: at least US$500 million for newly issued perpetual securities and at least US$100 million for fresh notes due in 2031. Bondholders would have until Dec 2, though they can get better prices if they agree to the plan by Nov 17, according to an exchange filing.
As for Vanke, a key concern for credit investors is how the company will navigate its looming bond maturity wall. The developer, once China's largest by sales, has around RMB22 billion (RM12.99 billion) of onshore bonds due or potentially facing early redemption requests by September 2026, according to a Moody's report last month.
Vanke has been relying on liquidity support from its largest shareholder, Shenzhen Metro Group Co, for months. The state-owned firm has extended more than RMB20 billion in loans to Vanke, most of which were previously unsecured. Shenzhen Metro is now requesting collateral for the borrowings and imposing a tentative limit for financing support.

FintechZoom.com crypto market cap provides a clear lens on how digital-asset value evolved from 2020 to late 2025. This report explains methodology, maps bull-bear cycles, ranks leading assets, and turns numbers into actionable takeaways. Expect concise tables, trend markers, and forward-looking context tailored to investors seeking reliable signals—not noise—when timing entries, managing risk, and allocating across market-cap tiers.
Market capitalization in the crypto world represents the total value of a cryptocurrency — calculated by multiplying the current price by the circulating supply. It helps investors compare coins, assess growth potential, and determine market dominance. Websites like fintechzoom.com crypto market cap use this metric to show how digital assets rank globally by value.
From 2020 to 2025, the global crypto market cap grew from under $250 billion to above $2.3 trillion at peak levels. This sharp rise, tracked closely by fintechzoom.com crypto market cap, reflected the surge in institutional adoption, DeFi expansion, and renewed investor interest after Bitcoin’s halving cycles. Despite volatility, overall value trends have remained upward.
| Rank | Cryptocurrency | Market Cap (Approx.) | Share of Total Market |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bitcoin (BTC) | $1.2 Trillion | ~52% |
| 2 | Ethereum (ETH) | $430 Billion | ~19% |
| 3 | Binance Coin (BNB) | $70 Billion | ~3% |
| 4 | Solana (SOL) | $65 Billion | ~2.8% |
| 5 | XRP | $50 Billion | ~2% |
Based on FintechZoom.com crypto market cap projections, 2026 could see continued expansion if Bitcoin maintains price strength above $80,000 and Ethereum scales efficiently. FintechZoom’s forecasts highlight a potential global market cap exceeding $3 trillion, supported by ETF inflows and improved cross-chain interoperability. However, regulatory shifts or sharp monetary tightening could temporarily reduce capital inflow.
Analysts following fintechzoom.com bitcoin news predict that the top 10 cryptocurrencies will continue to dominate over 80% of total market capitalization, though emerging AI and gaming tokens may contribute to new sector growth.
FintechZoom.com crypto market cap aggregates live data feeds from major exchanges, blockchain explorers, and institutional analytics providers to calculate accurate valuations. Market cap rankings refresh in real time, ensuring that investors view the most recent pricing and circulation metrics for each asset.
The system also cross-verifies on-chain supply and transaction data to eliminate distortions caused by delisted tokens or exchange manipulation. By combining this transparent data model with editorial insights, FintechZoom.com gives a balanced view of both performance and underlying fundamentals.
While market cap remains the primary metric, FintechZoom.com bitcoin news and related sections provide layered insights — tracking daily trading volume, liquidity shifts, and institutional accumulation trends. These updates help readers interpret why certain cryptocurrencies rise or fall in ranking, not just how much they move in value.
FintechZoom’s analytics engine simplifies complex blockchain metrics into digestible visuals. Heat maps, trend lines, and ratio comparisons reveal where liquidity flows, helping both beginners and professionals recognize early signals of momentum. Its focus on verifiable metrics makes fintechzoom.com crypto market cap a trusted reference for traders tracking the evolving digital economy.
Market cap data can reveal investor sentiment and sector rotation within the crypto ecosystem. Investors can use FintechZoom.com crypto market cap rankings to spot when capital shifts from large-cap assets like Bitcoin into mid-cap tokens such as Solana or Avalanche. Such movements often signal early-stage bull or bear trends across different categories.
Investors should not rely solely on rankings. FintechZoom.com bitcoin news offers crucial narrative context — such as ETF approvals, government policy changes, and blockchain upgrades — that often explain abrupt market cap shifts. Combining news flow with price data helps form a complete investment picture.
| Market Cap Tier | Typical Assets | Investor Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap (>$10B) | Bitcoin, Ethereum | Core portfolio positions, lower risk |
| Mid Cap ($1B–$10B) | Solana, Cardano, Avalanche | Growth-oriented allocations, moderate risk |
| Small Cap (<$1B) | Emerging DeFi and AI tokens | Speculative, high-reward opportunities |
Understanding fintechzoom.com crypto market cap data allows investors to time entries, diversify intelligently, and avoid hype-driven traps. By observing correlations between market cap shifts and macro events covered in fintechzoom.com bitcoin news, traders gain actionable foresight into emerging narratives and sector momentum.
Analysts expect moderate recovery and selective growth in 2026, with Bitcoin and Ethereum likely leading due to increasing institutional adoption and ETF inflows. FintechZoom.com crypto market cap projections indicate steady total value expansion if global regulations remain stable.
As of late 2025, the global crypto market cap hovers around $2.7 trillion, driven mainly by Bitcoin, Ethereum, and major altcoins. FintechZoom.com continuously updates this figure using live data from verified exchange sources.
FintechZoom.com combines on-chain analytics, exchange feeds, and institutional-grade verification to deliver highly reliable market data. Small discrepancies may occur due to exchange latency, but overall accuracy remains among the best in crypto reporting.
CryptoZoo’s market cap has fluctuated due to limited trading activity. FintechZoom.com tracks its live valuation through connected exchanges, though liquidity and transparency remain lower than for leading cryptocurrencies.
FintechZoom.com crypto market cap remains a reliable source for investors seeking clarity amid digital asset volatility. By tracking long-term trends, market shifts, and Bitcoin’s dominance, the platform helps users identify patterns that matter. For those planning 2026 strategies, consistent use of FintechZoom’s crypto insights enables smarter, data-driven investment decisions.
Wall Street chief executives said investors should brace for a equity market drawdown of more than 10% in the next 12 to 24 months, and that such a correction can be a positive development.
Corporate earnings are strong but "what's challenging are valuations," said Mike Gitlin, president and chief executive officer of investment manager Capital Group, on Tuesday during a financial summit organized by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
On whether stocks are cheap, fair or fully valued, Gitlin said most people "would say we're somewhere between fair and full, but I don't think a lot of people would say we're between cheap and fair," he said. The same goes for credit spreads, Gitlin added.
His views were echoed by Morgan Stanley CEO Ted Pick and Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s chief David Solomon, who also see the possibility of a significant selloff in the coming period and said pullbacks are a normal feature of market cycles.
Pick said markets have come a long way, but there's still "policy error risk" in the US and geopolitical uncertainty.
"Yes markets seem expensive...but the reality is that systematic risk has probably narrowed," he said. There will be more focus on company earnings in 2026 and there will be greater dispersion, where stronger firms will outperform while weaker ones will lag, he said. In addition, the new issue market is active around the world "and investors want to take risks."
"We should also welcome the possibility that there would be 10 to 15% drawdowns that are not driven by some sort of macro-cliff effect," Pick said, adding that "that's a healthy development."
Solomon said "technology multiples are full," but that's not the case for the whole market. He said Goldman's advice to client s has been to stay invested, to look at their portfolio allocations, and avoid trying to time the market.
He added that equity market drawdowns of 10% to 15% also often occur through positive cycles without altering the general direction of capital flows or long-term allocations.
"It just means things run and then they pull back so people can reassess," said Solomon.

Solo Mining Bitcoin has become an increasingly rare practice as industrial mining pools dominate the network in 2025. Yet some miners still chase the independence and full-reward potential of mining alone. This guide explains how solo mining works today, how difficult it has become, and whether individuals can still profit from it.
Solo bitcoin mining means attempting to mine Bitcoin blocks independently, without joining a mining pool. When you mine solo, you compete directly against the entire global network of miners to solve complex cryptographic puzzles. If you successfully find a block, you receive the full block reward—currently 6.25 BTC plus transaction fees—but you bear all the computational costs and risks alone.
The process of mining bitcoins solo follows Bitcoin's proof-of-work consensus mechanism. Your mining hardware repeatedly hashes block header data, searching for a hash value that meets the network's difficulty target. This is essentially a computational lottery where more hashing power increases your chances but guarantees nothing.
Here's what happens during solo bitcoin mining:
Unlike pool mining where rewards are distributed based on contributed work, solo mining operates on an all-or-nothing basis. You might mine for months or years without finding a single block, or you could theoretically find one on your first day—though the latter scenario is astronomically unlikely with typical hardware.
Understanding the fundamental differences between solo and pool mining is essential before committing resources to either approach.
| Aspect | Solo Mining | Pool Mining |
|---|---|---|
| Reward Distribution | 100% of block reward (6.25 BTC + fees) if successful | Proportional share based on contributed hashrate |
| Payment Frequency | Extremely rare, unpredictable (possibly never) | Regular payouts (daily to weekly) |
| Income Stability | Zero income for extended periods, then massive payout | Consistent, predictable returns |
| Pool Fees | None | 1-3% of earnings |
| Technical Requirements | Run full Bitcoin node, advanced setup | Simple connection to pool servers |
| Variance Risk | Extremely high—lottery-like odds | Low—smoothed returns across many miners |
| Minimum Hashrate | Realistically 100+ TH/s for any reasonable chance | Any amount accepted (even single ASIC) |
The economic reality is stark: pool mining provides predictable income that covers electricity costs and generates steady profit, while solo mining bitcoin resembles buying lottery tickets with your electricity bill. Most rational miners choose pools because consistent returns allow for business planning, equipment maintenance, and risk management.
The difficulty of solo mining bitcoin has reached unprecedented levels in 2025. To understand just how challenging it has become, we need to examine the current network conditions and calculate your realistic probability of success.
Bitcoin's mining difficulty adjusts every 2,016 blocks (approximately every two weeks) to maintain a consistent 10-minute block time. As of 2025, the network difficulty has increased dramatically compared to Bitcoin's early years, making solo mining exponentially harder than it was even a few years ago.
Key network statistics that impact solo mining difficulty:
This difficulty level means that even a state-of-the-art ASIC miner running at 100 terahashes per second (TH/s) represents only 0.000017% of the total network hashrate. You're competing against massive mining farms with thousands of machines operating in regions with cheap electricity.
Mathematics reveals the harsh reality of bitcoin solo mining success. Your probability of finding a block depends entirely on your hashrate relative to the total network hashrate.
Here's the probability calculation for different hardware scenarios:
| Your Hashrate | % of Network | Expected Time to Find 1 Block | Probability per Day |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 TH/s (1 high-end ASIC) | 0.000017% | ~11.4 years | 0.024% |
| 500 TH/s (5 ASICs) | 0.000083% | ~2.3 years | 0.12% |
| 1 PH/s (10 ASICs) | 0.00017% | ~14 months | 0.24% |
| 10 PH/s (100 ASICs) | 0.0017% | ~42 days | 2.4% |
| 100 PH/s (1000 ASICs) | 0.017% | ~4.2 days | 24% |
These are expected averages based on probability. The actual time could be much shorter or significantly longer due to the random nature of mining. You might find a block on your first day (probability near zero) or mine for triple the expected time without success—both scenarios have occurred in practice.
For perspective, if you run a single high-end ASIC costing $3,000-$5,000 with electricity expenses around $150-$300 monthly, you could spend $20,000+ on electricity over the expected 11.4 years before finding your first block. Even if successful, the block reward might not cover your accumulated costs, especially considering hardware depreciation and potential Bitcoin price fluctuations.
Despite astronomical odds, solo bitcoin mining pool victories do occasionally occur—but context matters enormously when evaluating these rare successes.
Notable recent success cases include:
The failure stories are far more common but rarely discussed:
Even success stories often reveal that pool mining would have been more profitable when considering risk-adjusted returns. The psychological appeal of potentially winning a full block reward clouds the mathematical reality that consistent pool returns typically generate superior outcomes over time.
Successfully mining bitcoins solo demands significant hardware investment and infrastructure planning. Unlike pool mining where even modest equipment can generate some returns, solo mining requires substantial computational power to have any realistic chance of finding a block within a reasonable timeframe.
Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) miners are the only viable hardware for solo bitcoin mining in 2025. Graphics cards (GPUs) and CPUs became obsolete for Bitcoin mining years ago due to efficiency limitations. Modern ASIC miners are purpose-built for the SHA-256 algorithm that Bitcoin uses, delivering hashrates that general-purpose hardware cannot match.
Current top-tier ASIC miners for solo mining consideration:
| Model | Hashrate | Power Consumption | Efficiency | Approximate Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antminer S21 | 200 TH/s | 3,500W | 17.5 J/TH | $5,000-$7,000 |
| Whatsminer M60 | 172 TH/s | 3,344W | 19.4 J/TH | $4,500-$6,500 |
| Antminer S19 XP | 140 TH/s | 3,010W | 21.5 J/TH | $3,500-$5,000 |
| AvalonMiner 1466 | 150 TH/s | 3,500W | 23.3 J/TH | $4,000-$5,500 |
For solo mining to be remotely feasible, you realistically need at least 500 TH/s to 1 PH/s of total hashrate. This translates to investing in 3-5 high-end ASIC miners, with an initial hardware outlay of $15,000 to $35,000. Even at this investment level, your expected time to find a block remains between 1-3 years under current network conditions.
Critical factors when selecting ASIC hardware:
Some miners explore solar powered bitcoin mining to offset electricity costs, though this requires additional investment in solar panels, inverters, and battery storage systems. A typical ASIC drawing 3,500 watts continuously needs approximately 12-15 kilowatts of solar panel capacity (accounting for efficiency losses and nighttime operations), adding $10,000-$20,000 to your initial investment per miner.
Electricity represents the ongoing operational expense that determines whether solo bitcoin mining remains financially viable. Unlike the one-time hardware purchase, electricity costs accumulate continuously and often exceed hardware investment over extended mining periods.
Understanding your electricity costs:
| Hardware Setup | Total Power Draw | Monthly kWh | Cost at $0.10/kWh | Cost at $0.15/kWh |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 ASIC (200 TH/s) | 3,500W | 2,520 kWh | $252 | $378 |
| 3 ASICs (600 TH/s) | 10,500W | 7,560 kWh | $756 | $1,134 |
| 5 ASICs (1 PH/s) | 17,500W | 12,600 kWh | $1,260 | $1,890 |
| 10 ASICs (2 PH/s) | 35,000W | 25,200 kWh | $2,520 | $3,780 |
Beyond electricity, infrastructure requirements add substantial costs:
Solar bitcoin mining can reduce operational costs, but requires substantial upfront investment and depends heavily on geographic location. Areas with optimal sun exposure (Southwest United States, parts of Australia, Middle East) provide better ROI for solar installations. However, battery storage systems necessary for 24/7 mining operations significantly increase costs—a battery bank capable of running 5 ASICs overnight might cost $15,000-$30,000 alone.
Insurance and maintenance represent ongoing expenses often overlooked by new miners. ASIC miners require regular cleaning, fan replacements, and occasional repairs. Budget approximately 5-10% of hardware value annually for maintenance and unexpected component failures.
Return on investment calculations for solo bitcoin mining reveal why most rational actors choose pool mining instead. While the potential for a massive one-time payout exists, the mathematical expected value typically favors consistent pool returns when accounting for risk, time value of money, and operational complexities.
A comprehensive cost analysis exposes the financial reality of solo mining attempts. Let's examine a realistic scenario with specific numbers to illustrate the economic challenge.
Example scenario: 1 PH/s solo mining operation (5 high-end ASICs)
| Cost Category | Initial Investment | Monthly Recurring | Annual Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASIC Hardware (5 miners) | $30,000 | — | — |
| Infrastructure Setup | $5,000 | — | — |
| Electricity (at $0.12/kWh) | — | $1,512 | $18,144 |
| Internet & Maintenance | — | $150 | $1,800 |
| Hardware Depreciation | — | — | $7,500 |
| Total First Year | $35,000 | $1,662 | $62,444 |
Expected outcome analysis:
This appears attractive on paper, but several critical risk factors undermine this optimistic scenario:
The probability distribution matters enormously. You have roughly a 30% chance of finding zero blocks in 20 months, a scenario where you lose your entire $70,000+ investment. Conversely, you have about a 5% chance of finding a block within 2 months, generating exceptional returns. This risk profile resembles venture capital investing or gambling rather than traditional business operations.
Comparing identical hardware operating in solo versus pool mining modes reveals the fundamental economic trade-off between variance and expected value.
Using the same 1 PH/s setup over 14 months:
| Metric | Solo Mining | Pool Mining |
|---|---|---|
| Expected Blocks Found | 1 block (average) | N/A (proportional shares) |
| Expected Revenue | $381,000-$393,000 | $385,000 |
| Pool Fees | $0 | $7,700 (2%) |
| Net Mining Revenue | $381,000-$393,000 | $377,300 |
| Operating Costs | $58,317 | $58,317 |
| Net Profit | $322,683-$334,683 | $318,983 |
| Revenue Certainty | High variance (might be $0) | 99%+ certainty |
| Cash Flow | Zero for months, then lump sum | Daily/weekly payouts |
The expected value difference is minimal—solo mining potentially saves 2% in pool fees, translating to roughly $3,700-$15,700 more profit over 14 months. However, this marginal advantage disappears when considering:
The solo bitcoin mining pool concept has emerged as a middle-ground option, where miners contribute hashrate to a pool that attempts solo mining on behalf of participants. If the pool finds a block, rewards distribute proportionally among contributors. This reduces individual variance while maintaining some solo mining characteristics, though it doesn't eliminate the fundamental probability challenges of competing against the entire network.
Bitcoin's notorious price volatility introduces another layer of complexity to solo mining ROI calculations. Unlike pool mining where you can sell rewards regularly to lock in prices, solo mining forces you to bet on Bitcoin's value at an unknowable future date when you might find a block.
Price scenario analysis for 1 PH/s operation finding a block after 14 months:
| BTC Price Scenario | Block Reward Value | Total Costs | Net Profit/Loss | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $100,000 (bull case) | $635,000 | $58,317 | +$576,683 | 989% |
| $80,000 (optimistic) | $508,000 | $58,317 | +$449,683 | 771% |
| $60,000 (moderate) | $381,000 | $58,317 | +$322,683 | 553% |
| $40,000 (pessimistic) | $254,000 | $58,317 | +$195,683 | 336% |
| $25,000 (bear market) | $158,750 | $58,317 | +$100,433 | 172% |
Even in pessimistic price scenarios, finding a block generates positive returns—but this analysis assumes you successfully find a block. The compounding risk involves both probability (might never find a block) and price uncertainty (block might be worth less than expected).
Additional price-related considerations:
The optimal strategy for most miners involves pool mining to generate steady income while Bitcoin price remains uncertain, then potentially switching to solo mining only if accumulating significant hashrate (10+ PH/s) that makes probability of success reasonable within specific timeframes. Attempting solo mining with modest hashrate essentially converts your mining operation into a speculative bet on both probability and future Bitcoin valuation—a dual-risk proposition that sophisticated investors typically avoid.
Setting up a solo mining operation requires technical knowledge beyond simply connecting hardware to a pool. You'll need to run your own Bitcoin node, configure mining software, and maintain reliable infrastructure. This section walks through the essential steps for anyone determined to attempt mining bitcoins solo despite the challenging odds.
The foundation of any solo mining operation is a fully synchronized Bitcoin Core node. Unlike pool mining where the pool operator manages blockchain data, solo miners must maintain their own complete copy of the Bitcoin blockchain and validate all transactions independently.
Step-by-step Bitcoin Core installation:
Mining software configuration comes next. Several options exist for solo bitcoin mining, each with different features and compatibility:
| Software | Best For | Key Features | Difficulty Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| CGMiner | Advanced users | Highly customizable, supports multiple hardware types | High |
| BFGMiner | ASIC miners | Dynamic clocking, monitoring, remote interface | High |
| Braiins OS+ | Antminer hardware | Firmware replacement with optimization features | Medium |
| Solo CK Pool | Beginners wanting solo experience | Simplified solo mining without running full node | Low |
For true solo mining, CGMiner or BFGMiner connected to your local Bitcoin Core node provides complete control. Configure your mining software with these essential parameters:
Alternative approach for those wanting to avoid full node complexity: solo bitcoin mining pool services like Solo CK Pool allow you to attempt solo mining by connecting your hardware to their infrastructure. You maintain the solo mining reward structure (keeping 100% of any block found minus a small fee), but delegate the technical burden of running a node. This reduces setup complexity but introduces minor centralization and trust requirements.
Once your software infrastructure is ready, connecting ASIC hardware involves both physical setup and network configuration. Modern ASICs include built-in web interfaces that simplify configuration compared to earlier generations of mining hardware.
Physical connection process:
Network configuration through ASIC web interface:
Verification steps to confirm successful connection:
Common troubleshooting issues include incorrect RPC credentials, firewall blocking connections between miner and node, or insufficient PSU power delivery causing hashboard failures. Most ASIC manufacturers provide detailed logs through the web interface that help diagnose connectivity problems.
Continuous monitoring separates successful mining operations from costly failures. Hardware issues, network disruptions, or configuration problems can silently drain electricity for days while generating zero useful work. Implementing robust monitoring systems provides early warning of problems and maximizes your already-slim chances of bitcoin solo mining success.
Essential metrics to monitor continuously:
Monitoring tools and platforms:
| Tool | Type | Key Features | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Awesome Miner | Software suite | Multi-device monitoring, alerts, remote management | Free (limited) / $200+ (pro) |
| Hive OS | Operating system | Comprehensive dashboard, mobile app, auto-tuning | Free (3 devices) / $3/device/month |
| MinerStat | Web platform | Cloud monitoring, profit switching, alerts | $2-4/device/month |
| Built-in ASIC interface | Hardware native | Basic stats, logs, configuration | Free (included) |
Setting up effective alert systems prevents costly extended downtime:
For operations using solar powered bitcoin mining, additional monitoring becomes essential. Track solar panel output, battery charge levels, and grid consumption to optimize your energy mix. Solar monitoring systems should alert you when battery reserves drop below thresholds needed to maintain 24/7 operation, allowing you to temporarily reduce mining intensity or switch to grid power during extended cloudy periods.
Regular maintenance schedules complement automated monitoring. Monthly tasks should include physically inspecting your ASICs for dust accumulation, verifying all fans spin freely, checking cable connections remain secure, and reviewing performance trends to identify gradual degradation before catastrophic failure occurs. Quarterly deep cleaning with compressed air prevents dust buildup that reduces cooling efficiency and shortens hardware lifespan.
Documentation practices help optimize long-term operations. Maintain logs of hashrate performance, downtime incidents, maintenance activities, and electricity costs. This data proves invaluable for calculating actual ROI, identifying patterns in hardware behavior, and making informed decisions about when to upgrade equipment or abandon unprofitable operations.
Yes, solo mining Bitcoin is still possible in 2025, but success chances are extremely low due to the high network difficulty and dominance of industrial-scale miners.
With a single high-end ASIC miner, it could take over 10 years on average to find one block. Even large setups may wait months or years without success.
Most solo miners earn nothing unless they find a full block. When successful, rewards can exceed $300,000 depending on Bitcoin’s price and fees.
Yes, solo mining is legitimate and aligns with Bitcoin’s decentralized design. However, the odds of consistent profitability are very small for most individuals.
Solo Mining Bitcoin in 2025 remains technically possible but highly challenging. It requires significant investment, constant power supply, and a willingness to take long-term risks for uncertain rewards. While it appeals to those who value independence and decentralization, most miners find pool mining a far more practical and profitable approach.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features

FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up