• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Trending
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
BID
ASK
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6949.85
6949.85
6949.85
6967.31
6925.10
+5.38
+ 0.08%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
49397.17
49397.17
49397.17
49616.70
49246.24
-45.26
-0.09%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23548.82
23548.82
23548.82
23664.26
23446.81
+18.81
+ 0.08%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
99.130
99.210
99.130
99.250
98.920
+0.010
+ 0.01%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.15988
1.15996
1.15988
1.16272
1.15843
-0.00104
-0.09%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.33833
1.33842
1.33833
1.34127
1.33660
+0.00026
+ 0.02%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4589.37
4589.80
4589.37
4620.79
4536.73
-26.58
-0.58%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
59.340
59.370
59.340
60.010
58.781
+0.206
+ 0.35%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

US Officials Have Floated Idea Of Broadening A Gaza “Board Of Peace” Headed By Trump To Include Other Hotspots Such As Ukraine And Venezuela,

Share

JPMorgan Chase Surpasses Dimensional To Become The World's Largest Issuer Of Actively Managed Exchange-traded Funds (ETFs). According To Data Compiled By Bloomberg, The Asset Management Arm Of JPMorgan Chase Currently Manages Nearly $257 Billion In Actively Managed ETF Assets Globally, Slightly Exceeding Dimensional Fund Advisors' Approximately $255 Billion

Share

IAEA: Secured The Agreement Of Both The Russian Federation And Ukraine To Implement A Localized Ceasefire

Share

Brent Crude Futures Settle At $64.13/Bbl, Up 37 Cents, 0.58 Percent

Share

IMF: Board Of The International Monetary Fund (IMF) Today Completed The Fourth Review Of The 48-Month (Ecf) For Ethiopia

Share

WTI Crude Oil Futures For February Delivery Closed At $59.44 Per Barrel. Nymex Natural Gas Futures For February Delivery Closed At $3.1030 Per Million British Thermal Units (MMBtu). Nymex Gasoline Futures For February Delivery Closed At $1.7852 Per Gallon, And Nymex Heating Oil Futures For February Delivery Closed At $2.2376 Per Gallon

Share

USA Crude Oil Futures Settle At $59.44/Bbl, Up 25 Cents, 0.42 Percent

Share

US Federal Aviation Administration Issues Warnings To Airlines To Exercise Caution When Operating In Various Areas Above Panama, Mexico, Central America, Colombia And Parts Of Pacific Ocean Due To Military Activities And Potential Interference

Share

ICE Certified Arabica Stocks Decreased By 2644 As Of January 16, 2026

Share

Easa: Potential For USA Military Action Has Placed Iranian Air Defence Forces On Heightened State Of Alert, Currently Increased Likelihood Of Misidentification Within Fir Tehran

Share

Easa On Iran Says Presence & Possible Use Wide Range Of Weapons & Air-Defence Systems Creates High Risk To Civil Flights Operating At All Altitudes

Share

Peru's Central Bank Says Buy 195 Million Dollars In Spot Market

Share

ICE - Gasoil Speculators Raise Net Long Positions By 15424 Contracts To 52519 In Week To January 13

Share

ICE - Brent Crude Speculators Raise Net Long Positions By 85496 Contracts To 208461 In Week To January 13

Share

ICE Futures Europe - Feed Wheat Speculators Trim Net Short Position By 5 Lots To 1118 Lots As Of Jan 13 - Exchange Cot Data

Share

ICE Futures Europe - Robusta Coffee Speculators Raise Net Long Position By 554 Lots To 4068 Lots As Of Jan 13 - Exchange Cot Data

Share

ICE Futures Europe - White Sugar Speculators Raise Net Long Position By 4544 Lots To 48203 Lots As Of Jan 13 - Exchange Cot Data

Share

ICE Futures Europe - Cocoa Speculators Increase Net Short Position By 875 Lots To 21313 Lots As Of Jan 13 - Exchange Cot Data

Share

U.S. Senator Warren And Other Democratic Members Questioned Several Major Banks About Venezuelan Oil

Share

Trump On Canada-China Trade Deal: It's A Good Thing For Prime Minister Carney To Sign A Deal

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Prices Received Index (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing New Orders Index (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Employment Index (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Export Price Index YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Index (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Initial Jobless Claims 4-Week Avg. (SA)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Export Price Index MoM (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing Unfilled Orders MoM (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing New Orders MoM (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Employment Index (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Wholesale Sales YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Wholesale Inventory MoM (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Philadelphia Fed Business Activity Index (SA) (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Weekly Natural Gas Stocks Change

A:--

F: --

P: --

Richmond Federal Reserve President Barkin delivered a speech.
U.S. Weekly Treasuries Held by Foreign Central Banks

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany CPI Final MoM (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany CPI Final YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany HICP Final MoM (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany HICP Final YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Brazil PPI MoM (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada New Housing Starts (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Capacity Utilization MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Industrial Output YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Manufacturing Capacity Utilization (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Manufacturing Output MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Industrial Output MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. NAHB Housing Market Index (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Russia CPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Core Machinery Orders YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Core Machinery Orders MoM (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Rightmove House Price Index YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland GDP YoY (YTD) (Q4)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Industrial Output YoY (YTD) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Industrial Output Final MoM (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Industrial Output Final YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Core HICP Final MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone HICP Final MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone HICP Final YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone HICP MoM (Excl. Food & Energy) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Core CPI Final YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Core HICP Final YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone CPI YoY (Excl. Tobacco) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Core CPI Final MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada National Economic Confidence Index

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Core CPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI YoY (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Trimmed CPI YoY (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Core CPI YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Core CPI MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea PPI MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland 1-Year Loan Prime Rate (LPR)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland 5-Year Loan Prime Rate

--

F: --

P: --

Germany PPI YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Germany PPI MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    bagus flag
    Kung Fu
    @Kung FuYes, buyers still dominate gold, and macroeconomically it's bullish. But if we look at the data, there's a reversal starting to appear, and I think there will be a long correction.
    Kung Fu flag
    @favourI'm sure, very certain, that 4590 offers itself as the most suitable entry price for a swing buyside starting today
    Kung Fu flag
    bagus
    @bagusokay. Let's see how it plays out. I feel that that correction just happened today
    SABR flag
    Is there any news in 30 minutes? What do you think, what do you say?
    Kung Fu flag
    Kung Fu flag
    Kung Fu
    @baguslook at this dip here. That was the correction. See the arrow
    Kung Fu flag
    SABR
    Is there any news in 30 minutes? What do you think, what do you say?
    @SABRno news. Are you looking forward to an event soon
    bagus flag
    Kung Fu
    @Kung Fuyeah you're right, he made a fakeout. I closed my chart 6 hours ago, man
    SABR flag
    No, I just wanted to know, not to risk it.
    ADKK987 flag
    Can anyone tell me
    Kung Fu flag
    SABR
    No, I just wanted to know, not to risk it.
    @SABRno news, Brother. The only thing you can do now is scalp
    ADKK987 flag
    Is holding trade till weekends are allowed in funding pips account 5k 2 step
    SABR flag
    What do you think about the market now? What do you say, where will it fly?
    Kung Fu flag
    bagus
    @bagusgood. I'm currently buying through range trading
    Kung Fu flag
    ADKK987
    Is holding trade till weekends are allowed in funding pips account 5k 2 step
    @ADKK987I think most propfirms allow it. Check with your propfirm
    Kung Fu flag
    SABR
    What do you think about the market now? What do you say, where will it fly?
    @SABRthe price is bouncing between 4589 and 5627, even as I said before
    Everthguti flag
    At this time it is no longer beneficial to operate
    Kung Fu flag
    Everthguti
    At this time it is no longer beneficial to operate
    @Everthgutino, not at all. You're right. It should be good night to the market
    3383256 flag
    join this channel. its free and awesome signals no fee nothing. no Ib change
    3383256 flag
    Kung Fu
    @Kung Fuyes its allowed
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          Trump's Risky Play for Critical Minerals Control

          James Riley

          Political

          Commodity

          Remarks of Officials

          Economic

          China–U.S. Trade War

          Summary:

          Trump's aggressive critical minerals policy, leveraging geopolitics, destabilizes markets and isolates key allies.

          President Donald Trump's focus on spheres of influence is radically reshaping the strategic outlook for critical minerals in 2026. This aggressive foreign policy, highlighted by actions in Venezuela and rhetoric on Greenland, risks using genuine supply chain security concerns as a pretext for geopolitical maneuvering.

          On January 14, Trump announced he would personally negotiate agreements to secure mineral supplies. While ensuring reliable supply chains is a valid priority, the administration's methods raise concerns. A balanced strategy of international partnership and targeted market interventions can build resilience, but recent actions suggest a disregard for sovereignty and international law that could destabilize markets.

          The Greenland Gambit: Mixing Policy and Minerals

          The Trump administration's interest in acquiring Greenland is a prime example of how resource security is becoming entangled with foreign policy. While the White House has cited multiple security reasons, access to Greenland's mineral wealth is a key motivating factor, as prioritized in the December National Security Strategy (NSS).

          Greenland holds significant deposits of rare earths and other critical minerals essential for US security projects like the F-35 fighter jet. Washington reportedly intervened last year to block the sale of a large project, rich in heavy rare earths and Gallium, to buyers with links to China.

          However, the reality on the ground presents a different picture:

          • Commercial Viability: Greenland's mining sector is years away from operating at a commercial scale.

          • Operational Hurdles: The region is geologically challenging and difficult to develop.

          • Existing Access: US companies can already access these resources without territorial control.

          By challenging the island's sovereignty, the administration is creating political friction and driving a wedge between the US and its G7 and EU partners. This is happening at the exact moment their cooperation is needed for other critical mineral initiatives.

          Price Floors and Unilateral Moves Strain Alliances

          President Trump’s January 14 proclamation also floated the idea of using price floors and other trade restrictions for critical minerals. However, such measures are difficult to implement without the participation of allies in Europe and Asia. Current political tensions are setting back the diplomatic efforts required to build these alliances.

          Other unilateral actions are also causing friction. In 2025, Trump signed Executive Order 14285 to fast-track domestic mining and assert US leadership in international waters. This move appears to bypass established frameworks like the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and the UN Convention on the Laws of the Sea (UNCLOS), which the US industry sees as too slow in creating regulations for extraction.

          In response, traditional US partners are hedging against Washington's unilateralism. Non-US members of the G7 are expected to accelerate their Action Plan in 2026, focusing on developing standards-based markets, mobilizing capital, and investing in their own partnerships.

          The Tense US-China Mineral Supply Chain

          The relationship between the US and China is set to remain tense in 2026. However, an agreement reached by Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping in October 2025 may prevent a return to the severe export controls and tariffs that defined earlier disputes. China's past restrictions on rare earths served as a wake-up call for the US about its supply chain vulnerabilities.

          For now, both nations seem unwilling to impose new, sweeping export bans on the most sensitive critical minerals, acknowledging the mutual costs and the difficulty of rerouting complex supply chains quickly.

          Despite this, geopolitical tensions will continue to foster exclusionary practices in mineral markets. Governments are pressuring end-users to source materials from specific countries, and both the US and China will increasingly push their companies to avoid infrastructure funded by the other.

          Why 'Critical Minerals' Isn't a Monolith

          The long-term demand for minerals is driven by fundamental economic shifts, including the energy transition, digitization, and development in emerging markets. For example, building out Africa's energy infrastructure to EU or UK levels would require an estimated one billion metric tons of copper.

          To succeed, the Trump administration must adopt a more nuanced understanding of individual mineral markets. Lumping all "critical minerals" together obscures their diverse risk profiles and can lead to ineffective policies that overshoot in some markets while undershooting in others.

          The market dynamics in 2026 vary significantly by commodity:

          • Nickel: A recent expansion in capacity has outpaced near-term demand from stainless steel and batteries, depressing prices and putting pressure on higher-cost producers.

          • Lithium: New projects have come online faster than downstream capacity can absorb the production, leading to sharp price corrections despite strong long-term demand projections. Policy reversals on electric vehicle mandates have also weakened prices.

          • Copper: This market faces a structural shortfall. Demand from EVs, data centers, and industrial electrification is accelerating while new supply is constrained by declining ore grades, project complexity, community opposition, and permitting delays.

          Furthermore, labeling too many materials as "critical" dilutes strategic focus. The U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) list now includes 60 materials, covering about 80% of all mined elements. Not every mineral can be a top priority.

          The Path Forward: Partnership Over Unilateralism

          Beyond the headlines, the US in 2026 must navigate ongoing trends like resource nationalism in Africa and increased investment in mining by Gulf states, which will both compete with and complement Western interests.

          Ultimately, working with international partners offers the most effective path for the US to secure its supply chains and compete in an increasingly complex world. President Trump's ambitions in Greenland must not be allowed to undermine the long-standing alliances that have been a cornerstone of American strength.

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump Cuts Taiwan Tariffs for $500B US Tech Investment

          Ukadike Micheal

          Remarks of Officials

          Economic

          China–U.S. Trade War

          Political

          The Trump administration has finalized a major trade deal with Taiwan, lowering tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15% in exchange for a landmark $500 billion investment aimed at advancing the United States' technology sector. This move is set to reshape global tech alliances and semiconductor supply chains, particularly amid ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and China.

          The Core of the Agreement

          Under the new terms, the 15% tariff reduction on Taiwanese products takes effect immediately. This decision follows extensive negotiations between key entities, including the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).

          The central component of the agreement is Taiwan's commitment to channel $500 billion into critical U.S. tech industries. This substantial investment is directly linked to the preferential tariff treatment.

          Strategic Implications for US-Taiwan Relations

          This trade deal significantly strengthens the partnership between the United States and Taiwan, a development that has drawn opposition from the Chinese government. The agreement positions Taiwan as a crucial strategic ally for the U.S. in both technology and global trade.

          Cho Jung-tai, the Premier of Taiwan, highlighted the deal's importance, stating, "For the time being, we obtained the best tariff deal enjoyed by the countries with a trade surplus with the U.S. ... This also shows that the U.S. sees Taiwan as an important strategic partner."

          Economic Impact on US Industries

          The influx of capital is expected to energize the U.S. technology landscape, with a particular focus on stimulating the semiconductor and artificial intelligence (AI) sectors. This investment is anticipated to drive economic growth, foster innovation, and enhance America's technological capabilities.

          Historically, similar trade and investment agreements have led to expansion and new employment opportunities within the tech industry.

          Future Outlook and Global Trade Dynamics

          While initial market reactions have been muted, the long-term effects of this deal could be profound. The tariff adjustment and massive investment are likely to trigger shifts in global trade flows, altering market shares and competitive dynamics. As the investment commitments are fulfilled, the deal is projected to provide a substantial boost to the American semiconductor and AI industries for years to come.

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          China just ‘months’ behind U.S. AI models, Google DeepMind CEO says

          Adam

          Economic

          China’s artificial intelligence models may be just “a matter of months” behind U.S. and Western capabilities, Demis Hassabis, the CEO of Google DeepMind told CNBC.
          The assessment from the head of one of the world’s leading AI labs and a key driver behind Google’s Gemini assistant, runs counter to views that have suggested China remains far behind.
          Speaking on CNBC’s new podcast, The Tech Download, which launched on Friday, Hassabis said Chinese AI models are closer to U.S. and Western capabilities “than maybe we thought one or two years ago.”
          “Maybe they’re only a matter of months behind at this point,” Hassabis told The Tech Download.
          About a year ago, Chinese AI lab DeepSeek came out with a model that sent shockwaves through markets because of its strong performance that was built on less-advanced chips and at a lower cost than American alternatives.
          While DeepSeek has released new models since, and the shock factor has worn off, China’s tech giants like Alibaba and startups such as Moonshot AI and Zhipu have also released very capable models.
          Still, Hassabis said that while China could play catch up, the country’s companies are yet to prove their ability to create AI breakthroughs.
          “The question is, can they innovate something new beyond the frontier? So I think they’ve shown they can catch up ... and be very close to the frontier ... But can they actually innovate something new, like a new transformer ... that gets beyond the frontier? I don’t think that’s been shown yet,” Hassabis said.
          The transformer was a scientific breakthrough made by Google researchers in 2017 that underpins the large language models that have been developed by AI labs in recent years, including those powering products like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini.
          Other top technology figures have also given credit to China’s progress. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said last year that the U.S. is “not far ahead” in the AI race.
          “China is well ahead of us on energy. We are way ahead on chips. They’re right there on infrastructure. They’re right there on AI models,” Huang said.

          China chip challenges

          China’s technology firms face a number of challenges, with access to critical technology among the biggest. There is a U.S. export ban in force on leading-edge semiconductors from Nvidia that are required to train more advanced AI models.
          The White House has indicated that it would approve sales of Nvidia’s H200 chip to China, a more advanced semiconductor than the country recently had access to. However, it is not Nvidia’s top-of-the-range product.
          Homegrown chip firms like Huawei have looked to fill the gap, but their performance still lags behind Nvidia’s offering.
          Some analysts have suggested that over the longer term, the lack of access to Nvidia chips in China could mean the gap between U.S. and Chinese AI models widens.
          “I do suspect, though that we will start seeing a divergence as that superior U.S. AI infrastructure starts iterating those models and starts making those models more capable over time in years to come,” Richard Clode, portfolio manager at Janus Henderson, told CNBC’s “The China Connection” last week.
          “So I would expect from here we’re probably at peak relative Chinese AI capability versus the U.S.”
          Even Chinese companies have acknowledged their difficulties.
          Lin Junyang, technical lead of Alibaba’s Qwen team, said during an AI conference in Beijing last week, that there was a less than 20% chance that a Chinese firm would surpass U.S. tech giants in the next three-to-five years when it comes to AI, the South China Morning Post reported. Lin reportedly said that U.S. computing infrastructure is “one to two orders of magnitude larger” than China’s.
          Hassabis however, puts the lack of frontier breakthroughs down to “mentality” rather than tech restrictions.

          ‘Modern day Bell Labs’

          The DeepMind CEO compared the company to a “modern day Bell Labs” which encourages “exploratory innovation” rather than just “scaling out what’s known today. Bell Labs, founded in the early 1900s, was responsible for a number of Nobel Prize-winning discoveries.
          “And of course, that’s already very difficult, because you need world-class engineering already to be able to do that. And China definitely has that,” Hassabis said.
          “The scientific innovation part that’s a lot harder,” Hassabis added. “To invent something is about 100 times harder than it is to copy it. ... That’s the next frontier really, and I haven’t seen evidence of that yet, but it’s very difficult.”
          Hassabis is considered to be one of the leading figures in the world of AI. DeepMind, the company he founded more than 10 years ago, which was acquired by Google in 2014, has been a key driving force behind Alphabet-owned Google’s recent success with its AI products, including Gemini.
          In November, Google introduced Gemini 3, its latest model, which has been well-received by users and the market as the tech giant looked to allay fears it was falling behind rivals like OpenAI.

          Source:cnbc

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          UK's Market Rally on Thin Ice as Data Looms

          King Ten

          Data Interpretation

          Bond

          Forex

          Remarks of Officials

          Economic

          Central Bank

          Traders' Opinions

          Stocks

          Daily News

          A strong start to the year for the British pound, government bonds, and stocks is about to face its first major test with the release of critical economic data. While all three asset classes have posted gains, sterling is the most exposed to a potential downturn.

          Upcoming inflation and unemployment figures could intensify bets on deeper interest-rate cuts from the Bank of England (BOE), creating significant headwinds for the currency. Despite the risk, the pound is currently on course for its fifth consecutive week of gains against a trade-weighted basket of currencies—its best performance since May.

          "Inflation is clearly coming off the boil, likewise the UK labour market is weakening quite rapidly," noted Peter Kinsella, global head of FX strategy at Union Bancaire Privee. "That says to us that the BOE will have more flexibility to cut rates and that's going to weigh on sterling."

          Sterling's Winning Streak Hangs in the Balance

          Traders across bonds and equities will scrutinize the new data for clues on whether recent market momentum can continue. While figures showed the economy rebounded in November, real-time indicators from card spending and business confidence suggest a weak December. Furthermore, the market has yet to fully digest the impact of Chancellor Rachel Reeves' November budget, which increased taxes by £26 billion.

          The upcoming UK Consumer Price Index (CPI) report is expected to show that inflation rose in December, following a significant drop in November. The BOE has anticipated this move and believes any price increases will be temporary, with the long-term trend pointing lower.

          Easing price pressures would strengthen the case for the BOE to lower borrowing costs. This would likely lead to falling bond yields, removing a key pillar of support for the pound, which has benefited from the UK's relatively high yields.

          Adding to the concern are the unemployment statistics due on Tuesday. A recent survey showed that UK employers reduced hiring this month, fueling fears of a rapidly cooling jobs market. According to Evelyne Gomez-Liechti, a multi-asset strategist at Mizuho International Plc, this data could be the "gunpowder markets need to price a more dovish BOE response."

          Stretched Positioning Leaves the Pound Vulnerable

          Analysts at Morgan Stanley have warned that stretched positioning makes the pound particularly susceptible to a downturn. They suggest sterling could deliver "the first big FX move of 2026" if the economic data comes in weaker than expected.

          Figure 1: CFTC data reveals a sharp increase in speculative net long positions on the pound, making the currency vulnerable to a reversal if economic data disappoints.

          Data from the CFTC shows that hedge funds and other speculators have significantly built up their bullish bets on the currency over the past month.

          "The pound will be more sensitive to softer data than to strong," said Jane Foley, head of G10 FX strategy at Rabobank. She anticipates the currency will struggle to overcome a key technical resistance level of 0.8644 against the euro, its 200-day moving average.

          The positive economic data for November, released Thursday, did little to support the pound, which ended the day down 0.3% on a trade-weighted basis. The rebound was partly driven by a one-off recovery at Jaguar Land Rover following a cyberattack, a factor unlikely to be repeated.

          A Mixed Outlook for UK Stocks

          The forecast for UK equities is more complex. The FTSE 100 has already gained 3% this year, rising above 10,000 points for the first time in history and capping its best year since 2009.

          However, Barclays plc strategist Emmanuel Cau remains cautious, maintaining an underweight rating on UK stocks. He argues that companies with a domestic focus are vulnerable due to the nation's precarious fiscal situation. Meanwhile, the internationally-focused companies in the FTSE 100, often viewed as defensive investments, may eventually underperform their European counterparts.

          Gilts Poised to Gain from Economic Weakness

          For bond traders, signs of a weakening economy and increased wagers on rate cuts would be a bullish signal, potentially extending the strong start for UK government bonds, known as gilts. The BOE, along with the Federal Reserve, is one of three G-10 central banks expected to continue cutting rates this year.

          "While the reported erosion in the UK government's fiscal buffer is a cause for concern, a complete wipe-out... isn't the base case. That buys the government time to set its fiscal house right, so there is no immediate risk for holders of gilts," explained Ven Ram, a macro strategist at Bloomberg Strategists.

          This week, the 10-year gilt yield dropped to its lowest point since December 2024, and the two-year yield fell to a low not seen since August of that year. A Bloomberg index tracking gilts has risen 0.9%, marking its best start to a year since 2023.

          David Roberts, co-portfolio manager of the Global Strategic Bond Fund at Nedgroup Investments, suggested that any volatility stemming from a poor showing by the Labour party in the May local elections could present a buying opportunity. "If gilts sell off for political reasons, without any real change in the economic fundamentals, we would likely take the other side of that move and go long the UK again," he said. Roberts recently took profits on UK bonds he purchased in August.

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump Floats New Tariffs In Push To Acquire Greenland

          Justin

          Political

          U.S. President Donald Trump gestures as he speaks during a "Great, Historic Investment in Rural Health Roundtable" in the East Room of the White House on Jan. 16, 2026 in Washington, DC.

          President Donald Trump said Friday he may impose tariffs on countries "if they don't go along with Greenland."

          "We need Greenland for national security. So I may do that," Trump said at the White House.

          The comments show Trump considering applying tariffs, one of his favorite tools for leveraging his executive power over foreign countries, to his increasingly aggressive efforts to acquire Greenland for the United States.

          The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC's request for additional information on Trump's remarks.

          Source: CNBC

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Congress on Track to Avoid Shutdown and Soften Trump Spending Cuts

          Adam

          Economic

          The US Congress is set to avoid another government shutdown later this month by passing compromise bills that would soften spending cuts sought by the Trump administration, according to Republicans and Democrats involved in the process.
          That would prevent a repeat of the 2025 government shutdown which disrupted government services and data for a record 43 days.
          The bipartisan cooperation ahead of a Jan. 30 funding deadline is a remarkable turn of events after Democrats blocked stopgap funding in October and November in a failed attempt to exert policy influence — in that case, extending Obamacare subsidies.
          Despite surging Democratic opposition in recent weeks to immigration raids in Minnesota and elsewhere ordered up by President Donald Trump’s administration, lawmakers have signaled they won’t shut the government down over the issue. Likewise, the now-expired health care subsidies — which show little sign of being revived — also aren’t seen as an impediment to reaching a new funding deal.
          “We are not going to shut down,” said Rosa DeLauro, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee that oversees government spending.
          “Clearly everybody is trying to get there,” agreed Tom Cole, the Republican who chairs the House Appropriations Committee. “I feel good about where we are at.”
          Most of the government is currently operating on a stopgap through Jan. 30. Yet even if there was a hangup now, its effects would be far less pronounced than during the last shutdown a few months ago.
          After enacting three annual spending bills late last year, the House this month has advanced five more of the 12 annual funding bills with super-majority votes. It is poised to release a bipartisan final four-bill package next week. The Senate, meanwhile, has passed six of the bills passed by the House.
          Hard compromises were needed in order to make sure Congress — and not the White House’s budget office — is once again directing US discretionary spending, said Senator Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee.
          “You don’t win anything if you take your ball and go home,” Murray said.
          ICE Battle
          The collaborative spirit is hitting one key snag — on funding for the Department of Homeland Security.
          Faulting ICE for causing unrest in cities like Minneapolis, and furious about reports of agents violently detaining US citizens and legal immigrants, progressive Democrats are calling for funding cuts and limitations on immigration enforcement agents.
          Lawmakers, however, see little chance that the DHS will face a messy funding lapse that could see US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents walking the streets of Minnesota forced to temporarily work without pay.
          That’s because progressive Democrats have made clear in public and private they aren’t seeking a government shutdown to achieve their goals.
          And while progressives are poised to vote against new funding for the agency, enough Senate moderates are expected to vote to advance a DHS bill and avoid any filibuster attempt.
          A fallback option if talks fail would be to put the agency on a stopgap spending bill that allows current levels of spending to continue, lawmakers said.
          “We are not going to solve this problem, but we can constrain some of the illegality,” said Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy, a lead negotiator on the DHS bill.
          Democratic Demands
          Murphy and fellow Democrats are seeking to require body cameras for ICE agents, forbid the use of masks on patrol and no-warrant searches, as well as barring raids on schools and houses of worship. They are also seeking constraints on the ability of DHS to pull money from accounts earmarked for other services in order to cover the cost of stepped-up immigration raids.
          The Democratic demands come after the ICE shooting of US citizen activist Renee Good in Minnesota galvanized liberal opposition to the expanded immigration raids by the Trump administration. The administration has said the killing was justified by self-defense, while Democrats have said the officer overreacted.
          Still, Democratic leaders are avoiding messaging around the words “defund ICE” after the slogan proved politically damaging in past election cycles. Instead they have settled on demanding no funding increases for ICE and US Border Patrol.
          Any such limitations would have minimal impact, as Trump’s already-enacted tax bill included a $175 billion infusion for border and immigration enforcement.
          Some progressive Democrats signaled they want the party to fight harder — and to be prepared to insist on cuts if Democrats win the House majority in the November midterm elections.
          “It’s very clear that people are horrified at what’s happening in Minneapolis, and they want to see robust Democratic response,” said liberal firebrand Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York. “I certainly don’t think that we should support expanded funding, and I will not vote for expanded funding.”
          Leading progressive Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington said that making demands now is about laying the groundwork to cut immigration enforcement funding if Democrats take control of the House after the midterms.
          “For me, it’s also about what happens when we have the gavels back, preparing the road for that moment,” she said.
          DOGE Rebuffed
          The bills that have advanced so far mostly reject large domestic spending cuts demanded by Trump. While the Internal Revenue Service and Environmental Protection Agency are set to see reductions, they’re far smaller than those sought by the president.
          The legislation also rejects Trump’s attempts to decimate the National Science Foundation, NASA’s science budget, and circumvent an attempt to send Army Corps of Engineers funding only to Republican-controlled states. The State Department funding bill is $19 billion above Trump’s proposal.
          Cole said Republicans aren’t trying to constrain Trump, noting that overall spending will be cut in 2026 compared to 2025.
          Democrats say they expect the administration to try to flout the law and impound spending, however passage of the bills would also boost litigation to stop that.
          For example, foreign aid is continued under the measures even if government functions are transfered from the shuttered USAID to the State Department. Entire agencies that Trump wanted shuttered like the National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for Democracy are continued in the package, while funding for weather and census data are restored.
          The funding of some US foreign aid marks a rebuff to Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency, which attempted to end it.
          Senator Brian Schatz, a Hawaii Democrat who helped negotiate the spending bill, said there has always been a bipartisan understanding that foreign aid is a relatively cheap way to project power abroad.
          “And we lost that for about six months,” he said, “but we’re putting the band back together.”

          Source: Bloomberg

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump Pushes New Healthcare Plan Amid Rising Premiums

          Henry Thompson

          Data Interpretation

          Political

          Remarks of Officials

          Economic

          Daily News

          President Donald Trump is urging Republican lawmakers to fast-track a new White House healthcare plan, aiming to reshape a debate that puts his party at risk with millions of Americans facing higher insurance costs and potential coverage loss.

          "I think we can make healthcare into a Republican issue because the Republicans are going to be close to unanimous on this," Trump declared during a White House roundtable on rural healthcare.

          The president’s push highlights a growing urgency to address household economic concerns, particularly healthcare access and affordability, which have fueled public skepticism about his administration's economic agenda. Trump renewed his attacks on the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, arguing his replacement plan would lower consumer costs instead of enriching insurance companies.

          "Obama didn't care about the rural community, to be totally blunt," Trump said. "What he did care about is insurance companies. And this was a bill to make insurance companies wealthy. And they did."

          Internal GOP Divisions Pose a Major Hurdle

          Despite the president's call for unity, securing widespread Republican support remains a significant challenge. The party has long been fractured over the best strategy to dismantle a law that millions of Americans depend on for their health coverage.

          This internal division was on full display during the roundtable. Trump directly pressed Republican Senator Dan Sullivan of Alaska on whether his colleague, Senator Lisa Murkowski, would support the new reforms. Murkowski has previously opposed efforts to repeal the ACA.

          "Will you get Lisa Murkowski to vote for it?" Trump asked.

          "We'll work on it, sir," Sullivan replied.

          The Soaring Cost of Coverage: A Political Powder Keg

          The White House faces an immediate healthcare challenge as premiums are expected to rise for over 20 million Americans. With the ACA's open enrollment period having just ended, early data shows that sign-ups have dropped by more than a million people.

          Experts warn this decline could worsen as consumers begin to pay premiums that are projected to double on average. The spike is a direct result of subsidies that lapsed at the beginning of the year after lawmakers failed to extend the tax credits.

          That legislative stalemate was partially influenced by Trump himself, who had vowed to reject any bill that renewed subsidies for the ACA. Democrats have capitalized on the looming premium hikes in their messaging ahead of the November elections. The issue is especially potent because the tax credits largely benefited consumers in Republican-led states, adding pressure on GOP lawmakers fighting to maintain their majority.

          Inside Trump's "Great Healthcare Plan"

          In response, Trump has unveiled a proposal he calls the "Great Healthcare Plan," urging Congress to pass it without delay. While the White House describes the plan as "comprehensive," it lacks many of the details lawmakers will need to evaluate it.

          The framework includes several key pillars:

          • Lowering Drug Prices: It would codify voluntary agreements the president has made with pharmaceutical companies to reduce the cost of some drugs and increase the availability of over-the-counter medicines.

          • Targeting Middlemen: The plan vows to "end the kickbacks" paid to large brokerage middlemen that it claims deceptively increase health insurance costs.

          • Direct Subsidies: It proposes sending billions in subsidies directly to consumers to purchase health insurance, rather than to the insurance companies. Health experts note this proposal could be difficult to implement and does not guarantee better health outcomes.

          Broader Context: Medicaid Cuts and Rural Health

          The administration's renewed focus on healthcare is also fueled by the consequences of its signature tax-and-spending package from the previous year. That legislation included cuts to Medicaid, the public insurance program for low-income and disabled individuals.

          Those reductions are projected to cause 11.8 million people in the U.S. to lose their health insurance over the next 10 years. To help soften the impact, the administration announced in December that it would award funds to states from a rural health fund.

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2026 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Personal Information Protection Statement
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          FastBull Membership

          Not yet

          Purchase

          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com