Trump's Greenland Push Sparks Diplomatic Firestorm

Figure 1: The Bank of Japan headquarters in Tokyo. The central bank's decision-making is increasingly scrutinized amid domestic and international political pressures.

When central bank chiefs from around the world issued a rare joint statement supporting Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, one major player was conspicuously absent: the Bank of Japan (BOJ). This decision stems from a complex mix of the BOJ's traditional aversion to politics and the Japanese government’s caution in navigating its relationship with the United States, especially with a potential election looming.

Behind the Decision: Government Hesitation

The move was not made in isolation. According to two government sources, the BOJ informally consulted with the Japanese government on whether to sign the statement, which was released on Tuesday. However, officials were unable to provide a timely approval.

"The reason we couldn't immediately say yes is partly because of our relationship with the U.S.," one source explained, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Both the BOJ and the government have remained tight-lipped on the matter. A spokesperson for the central bank declined to comment, while the government's top spokesperson, Minoru Kiuchi, stated on Wednesday that the issue was under the BOJ's purview.

The global statement was a direct response to the Trump administration's threat of a criminal indictment against Powell, a move that raised fears about the erosion of central bank independence worldwide. While BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda has consistently emphasized the importance of independence, he has avoided commenting on President Donald Trump's criticisms of the Fed.

Domestic Politics and an Impending Election

Analysts suggest the BOJ's refusal to sign aligns with its long-standing policy of avoiding controversial political topics, a practice rooted in Japan's own history of political interference in monetary policy.

However, the current political climate likely played a key role. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, who often highlights her close relationship with President Trump, is widely expected to call a snap election in February. This political backdrop makes any action that could be seen as critical of the U.S. administration particularly sensitive.

"The BOJ's decision is in line with its protocol," said Takahide Kiuchi, a former BOJ board member now at Nomura Research Institute. "But it also shows how it's not completely independent from government interference."

Kiuchi added that criticizing U.S. policy could have direct consequences for Japan's government. "Criticising U.S. policy could put Japan's government under heat from Trump," he noted. "It's safest to avoid making any comment on what's happening overseas."

This cautious approach is not unique to Japan. In New Zealand, the foreign minister publicly rebuked the country's central bank governor for signing the statement in support of Powell.

The Fragile Independence of Japan's Central Bank

Although a 1998 law grants the BOJ nominal independence, it has not been immune to political pressure, particularly calls to maintain monetary support for Japan's economy. While the government cannot dismiss a BOJ governor, it holds the power to appoint the governor and board members, all of whom require Parliamentary approval.

Prime Minister Takaichi, known as a proponent of loose fiscal and monetary policy, created market jitters after taking office in October. She initially asserted that she had control over monetary policy direction and voiced a preference for low interest rates.

Later, as a weakening yen threatened to drive up import costs, her administration consented to the BOJ's decision to raise interest rates to 0.75% from 0.5% in December. Despite this, Takaichi's reflationist advisers continue to warn against further rate hikes.

The upcoming election adds another layer of complexity. If Takaichi secures a strong victory for her ruling party, her administration could fill two upcoming vacancies on the BOJ's nine-member board. Analysts believe it could also influence the choice for the next governor when Ueda's term concludes in early 2028.

"The BOJ is not immune to the kind of things happening with the Fed," Kiuchi warned. "Although not as explicit as the way Trump intervenes, Takaichi has and could make a lot of requests about what the BOJ ought to do."

A Justice Department investigation into the Federal Reserve is ringing alarm bells across Wall Street, with investors and former officials viewing it as a potential new front in a campaign to compromise the central bank's independence. While President Trump denies any involvement, the probe follows his repeated public attacks on Fed Chairman Jerome Powell.

For investors, the implications are serious. Even the perception that political pressure is influencing monetary policy could inject severe volatility into the stock market.

A Pattern of Political Pressure

President Trump has been vocal about his desire for lower interest rates. With his administration's tariffs threatening to slow the economy and federal debt surpassing $38 trillion, cheaper borrowing costs would help offset economic headwinds and reduce the government's debt servicing expenses.

While past presidents have tried to influence the Fed, Trump's methods—combining public criticism, social media attacks, and threats of legal action—are unprecedented.

Figure 1: President Trump has frequently used public platforms to pressure the Federal Reserve and its officials.

Here is a timeline of key events:

• April 2025: After Powell warned that tariffs could trigger stagflation—a mix of high inflation and unemployment—Trump threatened to fire him and called him a "major loser" on social media.

• June 2025: Ahead of a Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting where rates were expected to be held steady, Trump attacked Powell, calling him a "stupid person" and a "numbskull."

• August 2025: Trump attempted to oust Fed Governor Lisa Cook over a 2021 mortgage fraud allegation, a move the Supreme Court later blocked, reaffirming that governors can only be removed for misconduct in office.

• December 2025: With Powell's term ending in May, Trump publicly stated his next Fed chair must agree to lower interest rates when markets are strong, adding, "Anybody that disagrees with me will never be the Fed chairman." He also threatened to sue Powell for incompetence.

• January 2026: The Justice Department issued grand jury subpoenas to the Fed regarding Powell's June testimony. Powell described the investigation as a pretext designed to pressure policymakers into cutting rates.

Beyond public pressure, Trump may have already influenced the Fed's internal dynamics by nominating Stephen Miran to succeed former Governor Adriana Kugler. In his three FOMC meetings, Miran has consistently voted against the majority, advocating for larger interest rate cuts each time.

Why Fed Independence Is a Market Cornerstone

The Federal Reserve operates as an independent government agency with a dual mandate: maintain stable prices and maximize employment. It achieves this primarily by setting the federal funds rate, a benchmark that influences interest rates throughout the economy.

This independence is crucial. It allows policymakers to make decisions based on long-term economic stability, free from the short-term pressures of electoral cycles. Without it, politicians could force the central bank to cut rates to create a temporary economic boost before an election, even if it meant triggering serious consequences later.

The main long-term risk is inflation. Unnecessary rate cuts would eventually overheat the economy, eroding the value of consumer savings and income. This would force investors to demand higher yields on Treasury bonds to compensate for the added inflation risk, driving up the government's cost to service its debt.

The Bottom Line for Investors

The connection between government debt and the stock market is direct. As Treasury yields rise, these safer government bonds become more attractive relative to riskier assets like stocks. This can pull capital out of the equity market, putting downward pressure on prices.

Historically, the S&P 500 has often struggled when the yield on the 10-year Treasury bond climbs above 4.5%. With the current yield hovering near 4.2%, the market is already sensitive to factors that could push rates higher.

If President Trump successfully undermines the Federal Reserve's independence—or if investors merely believe he has—the fallout could be swift. The result would almost certainly be a volatile market and a sharp, significant drop in stock prices.

Bank of England policymaker Alan Taylor has signaled that UK interest rates should keep falling, citing an improved outlook for inflation.

In a speech delivered at the National University of Singapore, Taylor stated that the central bank’s 2% inflation target is now likely to be reached by mid-2026, a significant acceleration from the previous forecast of 2027.

Inflation Outlook Drives Policy Shift

According to Taylor, the improved inflation trajectory is sustainable due to cooling wage growth. This has boosted his confidence that monetary policy can return to a neutral stance sooner than previously expected.

"Interest rates should continue on a downward path," Taylor remarked, adding the condition that his outlook must continue to align with incoming economic data, as it has over the past year.

Context from the Monetary Policy Committee

This perspective aligns with Taylor's recent voting record. He was one of the five members on the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) who voted in December to cut the benchmark interest rate from 4% to 3.75%.

The decision was not unanimous, however. The other four members of the committee voted to keep borrowing costs unchanged, highlighting the ongoing debate within the central bank about the appropriate path for UK monetary policy.

[Quick Facts]

[News Details]

[Today's Focus]

France risks entering a fiscal "danger zone" with international lenders if its budget deficit surpasses 5% in 2026, according to a stark warning from European Central Bank policymaker Francois Villeroy de Galhau.

"I must say with some seriousness that with a deficit of more than 5%, France would be in the red zone, in the danger zone as far as international lenders are concerned," Villeroy said during an interview with BFMTV.

Figure 1: Bank of France Governor Francois Villeroy de Galhau details his concerns over the country's fiscal path.

Political Gridlock Weighs on Economic Growth

Villeroy, who also serves as the Governor of the Bank of France, highlighted that ongoing political uncertainty surrounding the budget is already costing the economy at least 0.2 percentage points of growth.

Despite these headwinds, he noted that the French economy, the second-largest in the eurozone, is demonstrating resilience. Citing the Bank of France's latest business sentiment survey, Villeroy stated that growth for the full year of 2025 is projected to be 0.9%.

Budget Deadlock Sparks Fiscal Concerns

The fiscal warning comes amid a tense political backdrop. French lawmakers failed to pass the 2026 budget by the end of last year, which necessitated the implementation of emergency stop-gap legislation.

Although legislators resumed their review of the budget on Tuesday, there is widespread speculation that the government may need to invoke special constitutional powers to bypass parliament and ensure its passage.

Gold and silver have kicked off 2026 with a powerful rally, building on spectacular gains from the previous year. Money managers are now betting that a perfect storm of supply constraints, geopolitical conflict, and questions surrounding central bank independence could push the precious metals to new heights.

The rally gained momentum on Monday when gold surged to a record high of over $4,600 an ounce. The move followed news that U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is facing a criminal investigation linked to the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's headquarters. By Wednesday, spot gold had climbed further to approximately $4,633.46 an ounce.

Silver has seen even more dramatic action, breaking the $90 threshold for the first time on Tuesday. It was last trading 3.5% higher at $90.42 per ounce.

Geopolitical Tensions Fuel "Resource Nationalism"

Daniel Casali, a partner at wealth manager Evelyn Partners, confirmed on Tuesday that his team is bullish on both gold and silver, citing persistent geopolitical instability as a key driver. He pointed to events like Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and U.S. President Donald Trump's "liberation day" tariffs in April as sources of uncertainty supporting prices.

According to Casali, these trade conflicts are creating an environment of "resource nationalism" that directly benefits precious metals.

"When Trump started to raise tariffs, China started to respond," Casali explained. "China responded [to liberation day] by restricting rare earth exports—and what the U.S. discovered is that those rare earths are absolutely essential for their defense, their technology, for AI, you name it."

He noted this pattern has continued with silver. "Fast forward a little bit, and we have export restrictions on silver. And again, silver is essential for AI technology, EVs, renewables, it's a critical part of industrial production in the U.S. and the West."

The market is now focused on a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi in April, where Casali believes export controls will be a central topic. The political stakes have been raised further in the first week of 2026 by a U.S. ousting of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and White House discussions about potential military action to assert control over Greenland.

"Both presidents are positioning their countries to try and [gain] leverage," Casali said of the U.S. and Chinese leaders. He argued that while China uses its control over rare earths and silver, the U.S. is attempting to restrict resources flowing to China, such as Venezuelan oil. "There are all these geopolitical chess pieces going round, but I think the key message here is resource nationalism can force up gold and silver prices."

Price Forecasts: $5,000 Gold and $100 Silver?

The sharp ascent in prices has analysts forecasting even bigger moves. In 2025, spot gold climbed around 65%, while silver surged by 150%. So far in 2026, gold is up 7.1%, and silver has already gained an additional 26.6%.

Ned Naylor-Leyland, an investment manager at Jupiter Asset Management, told CNBC on Tuesday it was "absolutely" possible for gold to reach $5,000 and silver to surpass $100 this year. He stated that based on the current drivers, investors "should assume that that would definitely happen this year."

Naylor-Leyland expects gold to follow a similar trajectory to last year, with silver once again being the outperformer in 2026.

The Physical Silver Squeeze

A critical factor in the silver market is the physical supply shortage, which has been intensified by Beijing's export controls.

"Silver is basically disappearing now to China and India—there's about a $10 premium being paid in Shanghai," Naylor-Leyland said. He stressed that the market is now focused on physical bars, suggesting the price could go "substantially" higher as supply tightens.

"If we continue to see this very, very wide spread between the price paid in Shanghai and the price on the screen in the West, then the remaining physical silver... should continue to head east," he added.

Silver's role as an essential industrial component in computers, phones, cars, and appliances makes the supply situation critical. "The thing about silver is, if you don't have it, you can't build anything," Naylor-Leyland said.

Fed Scrutiny Drives Safe-Haven Demand

Beyond geopolitics, Naylor-Leyland noted that gold's rise is tied to a "debasement observation," with central banks expected to remain dovish. "We're in a rate-cutting environment with unconventional policies and chasing down chairman Powell," he said. "Unless we get policy reversal and they go hawkish and start hiking, you can expect gold to do pretty much what it did last year or more."

The investigation into Powell has amplified these concerns. Paul Syms, a product management head at Invesco, said the news has "increased concern about the independence of the Fed and US monetary policy and spurred further interest in Gold as a perceived safe haven asset and inflation hedge."

In a show of support, a dozen global central bankers, including the heads of the ECB and Bank of England, issued a statement of "full solidarity" with Powell and the Fed.

However, the supportive backdrop for precious metals appears locked in. "While Gold and Silver are close to all-time highs, there does not appear to be any catalyst in the near term that is likely to cause prices to drop," Syms concluded. He cited ongoing worries about the U.S. dollar, budget deficits, the prospect of lower rates, and increasing industrial demand for silver as factors likely to continue buoying the market.