Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



U.K. Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Services PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Composite PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Economic Activity Index YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Russia Trade Balance (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Expectations Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Coincident Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Lagging Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Business Expectations Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany IFO Business Climate Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Current Business Situation Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Brazil Current Account (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Unemployment Rate (Not SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada National Economic Confidence Index--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl.Transport) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Chicago Fed National Activity Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed New Orders Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed General Business Activity Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BRC Shop Price Index YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Industrial Profit YoY (YTD) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Trade Balance (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index YoY (Not SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Composite Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Present Situation Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Expectations Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Shipments Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Services Revenue Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Australia RBA Trimmed Mean CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI QoQ (Q4)--
F: --
P: --













































No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
The Supreme Court will rule on Trump's attempt to fire a Fed governor, a case set to redefine the central bank's independence from political influence.
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a landmark case that could fundamentally reshape the Federal Reserve's independence from political influence. The dispute centers on President Donald Trump's attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook, putting the central bank's century-old shield against political pressure to its most significant test.
At stake is whether the world's most important central bank can continue to operate without direct interference from the White House, a principle Congress designed to protect it. The court's decision could either reinforce this independence or hand presidents a new level of control over monetary policy.
Key points in this high-stakes confrontation include:
• The Supreme Court will review Trump's move to oust Fed Governor Lisa Cook.
• The ruling could redefine the legal standard for removing a Fed official.
• Analysts fear the outcome may weaken the central bank's political insulation, impacting its credibility.

The case revolves around Trump's effort to remove Lisa Cook from her post over allegations of mortgage fraud. While the immediate outcome will determine Cook's future at the Fed, the broader implications are far-reaching. Even if she retains her position, the court's ruling could establish the first clear roadmap for how a president might legally remove a member of the central bank's governing body.
The Federal Reserve Act states that a governor can only be removed "for cause." This standard has never been tested in court and is intended to prevent dismissals over policy disagreements, such as interest rate decisions. Both Cook and Fed Chair Jerome Powell argue that policy disputes are the true motivation behind the administration's actions, which have also included threatened criminal charges against Powell.
Last August, Trump announced he was firing Cook, whose term expires in 2038, based on claims she misrepresented information on a home mortgage application. No financial institution has accused her of fraud, and no charges have been filed. Cook sued to block her removal, and a lower court allowed her to remain in her job pending a hearing.

The Trump administration's argument effectively suggests that "cause" is whatever the president determines it to be. If the Supreme Court agrees, it would place Fed governors on precarious ground, potentially allowing them to be removed at will.
Legal experts and former Fed officials are watching closely, with opinions varying on how the conservative-leaning court might rule.
"The door is open," said Loretta Mester, a former Cleveland Fed President now at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. "The question is how does it get resolved in a way that does not allow whoever is in the president's office to just decide, okay, I don't want that person, I will accuse them of doing something and that is enough."
Jon Faust, a former top adviser to Powell and former Chair Janet Yellen, expressed concern that the Fed's political insulation will be weakened regardless of the verdict. "I think the prospect of coming out with a strict and hard-to-clear hurdle is highly unlikely," said Faust, now an economics professor at Johns Hopkins University. "The battles will go on, Trump will continue the attacks... it is highly likely that independence does crumble."
Others are more optimistic. Kathryn Judge, a professor at Columbia Law School, suggested the court might seek a middle ground. "It does look like they're going to try to carve out some exception that allows the Fed to maintain independence," she noted. "But for that independence... to be effective, cause has to mean something."
The principle of Fed independence is built on a simple premise: monetary policy often requires making decisions that are politically unpopular in the short term but beneficial for the economy in the long run. Fed governors are given long, 14-year terms precisely to shield them from the pressures of two- and four-year election cycles.
The classic example is former Fed Chair Paul Volcker's battle against high inflation in the 1980s. He implemented punishing, double-digit interest rates that triggered two recessions and pushed unemployment above 10%. The economic pain contributed to President Jimmy Carter's loss in the 1980 election.
However, that painful medicine worked. By demonstrating its resolve, the Fed established immense credibility, which helped anchor public inflation expectations for decades. This credibility is believed to have helped the central bank bring down the recent pandemic-era inflation spike without causing the severe recession many economists had predicted. If monetary policy becomes subject to political demands, that hard-won credibility—and its economic benefits—could be lost.
If presidents can easily fire Fed officials, the temptation to pressure the central bank for short-term political gain could become irresistible. Too-loose monetary policy can create a temporary economic boom by lowering unemployment to unsustainable levels, but it ultimately drives up wages and prices, leading to higher inflation down the road.
"If you are not an independent central bank, inflation is higher, and it is higher by a lot," explained William English, a Yale School of Management professor and former head of the Fed's monetary affairs division. "The benefits arrive up front. The costs arrive later, so there may be a temptation to ease policy and have lots of talk about the Trump boom and the inflation becomes somebody else's problem."
The gravity of the situation was highlighted when the Fed's last three chiefs, including Alan Greenspan, signed a joint statement supporting Powell. They warned that the administration's actions were reminiscent of "how monetary policy is made in emerging markets with weak institutions," not in the country responsible for the world's reserve currency.
One year after returning to the White House on January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump has unleashed a policy blitz that is reshaping the American government and expanding the boundaries of executive power. As he enters his second year, Trump appears to be operating with fewer constraints than ever, pursuing an agenda that has deepened national divisions.
In a series of bold moves, Trump has demonstrated an increasingly aggressive approach. His administration recently ordered a federal crackdown on illegal immigration in Minnesota, which resulted in the shooting death of an unarmed female motorist by a federal agent. On the world stage, he oversaw a military raid in Venezuela to capture President Nicolas Maduro, revived a controversial plan to acquire Greenland, and threatened to bomb Iran.
When questioned about a criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, Trump dismissed concerns about potential economic fallout. "I don't care," he told Reuters in an Oval Office interview. Earlier, he told The New York Times on January 7 that the only check on his authority to launch military strikes was "my own morality," underscoring a belief that his power is limited primarily by his own judgment rather than institutional restraint.
Trump came into his second term with a vow to remake the U.S. economy, federal bureaucracy, and immigration policy. He has made significant progress on that agenda, cementing his role as one of the most powerful presidents in modern American history.
Presidential historian Timothy Naftali argues that Trump has wielded power with fewer limitations in his second term than any president since Franklin Roosevelt. During his tenure from 1933 to 1945, Roosevelt commanded large congressional majorities that passed his agenda with little resistance, buoyed by public support and a fractured opposition.
Similarly, Trump has expanded executive authority through a stream of executive orders and emergency declarations, shifting decision-making from Congress to the White House. This push has been largely supported by a conservative-majority Supreme Court and a Republican-controlled Congress. Unlike his first term, his cabinet is now filled exclusively with loyalists.
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly stated that while diplomacy is Trump's first instinct, he keeps all options open. She confirmed he ordered the raid on Maduro and the bombing of three Iranian nuclear facilities last year only "after both failed to negotiate in a serious way."

A Sweeping Policy Overhaul
In his first year back in office, Trump has implemented sweeping changes across the government, including:
• Cutting the size of the federal civilian workforce.
• Dismantling and closing entire government agencies.
• Slashing humanitarian aid to foreign nations.
• Ordering sweeping immigration raids and deportations.
• Deploying National Guard troops to Democratic-run cities.
• Imposing tariffs that have triggered trade wars.
• Passing a massive tax-and-spending-cut bill.
• Prosecuting political enemies and attacking universities, law firms, and media outlets.
• Canceling or restricting access to certain vaccines.
Despite promising to end the war in Ukraine on his first day in office, Trump has made little progress on a peace deal, even as he claims to have ended eight wars—a statement disputed by the ongoing conflicts in those regions.
Like all second-term presidents, Trump faces the inevitable decline of his political power. He remains a deeply unpopular figure, with a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll placing his approval rating at 41%, while 58% of U.S. adults disapprove of his job performance. While low for a president, he retains substantial backing from his core supporters.
The primary issue for voters ahead of the November congressional elections is the high cost of living. When asked about high prices, Trump repeated his claim that the economy was the "strongest" in history, despite data showing stubbornly high inflation. In recent weeks, he has complicated his own messaging by calling the issue of affordability a Democratic "hoax."

This difficulty in addressing voters' economic struggles could create challenges for his party. Democratic strategist Alex Floyd warned that "Trump's total disregard for the rule of law or basic checks and balances has made Americans less safe," adding that voters could punish Republicans for what he called "lawless behavior."
Midterm Elections Loom Large
Trump himself has acknowledged the political danger. In his interview with Reuters, he conceded that Republicans could lose control of Congress in the November elections, noting that history rarely favors the president's party in midterms.
He has urged Republican lawmakers to fight to retain their majority, warning that a Democrat-controlled House of Representatives would impeach him for a third time. To counter the negative sentiment, Trump's aides say he plans to travel frequently to promote his economic agenda. However, his recent speeches on the economy have often been unfocused, a lack of message discipline that alarms some Republican strategists as the elections draw closer.
President Donald Trump is scheduled to meet with global business leaders this Wednesday at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland. Sources familiar with the plans indicate that CEOs from sectors including financial services, cryptocurrency, and consulting have been invited to a reception following Trump's formal address.
The White House reportedly issued the invitations for the event, described in one CEO's schedule simply as "a reception in honour of President Donald J Trump." The meeting is expected to include a global contingent of corporate leaders, not just those from the United States, though the specific agenda remains unclear.
Trump is set to arrive in the Swiss resort on Wednesday to deliver a special address to the forum. He will be accompanied by several high-ranking U.S. officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is slated to hold a press briefing on Monday.
The formal agenda of the WEF, which will host over 3,000 delegates from more than 130 countries, has been significantly impacted by recent U.S. policy moves. This year's gathering includes 64 heads of state and government, with many focused on shifts in U.S. policy under the Trump administration.
Recent dramatic policy statements from President Trump, including his demand that the United States purchase Greenland, are casting a shadow over the event.
These tensions have already had a direct impact on sideline meetings. According to diplomatic sources, national security advisers from several countries are meeting on Monday, and the topic of Greenland has been added to their agenda. A European diplomat confirmed this was a direct result of Trump's threat on Saturday to impose additional tariffs on eight European countries.
The threat of new tariffs, linked to the U.S. being allowed to buy Greenland, caused European stock markets to fall on Monday.
Adding another layer of international intrigue, Vladimir Putin's special envoy, Kirill Dmitriev, is also traveling to Davos. Two sources confirmed that Dmitriev plans to hold meetings with members of the U.S. delegation during the forum.

Political

Commodity

Remarks of Officials

Palestinian-Israeli conflict

Economic

Central Bank

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Middle East Situation

Stocks
Gold and silver prices have climbed to new records, driven by a surge in investor demand for safe-haven assets as geopolitical and economic uncertainty intensifies. This rally follows a series of market-shaking events that have pushed investors toward precious metals.
On Monday, U.S. gold futures for February delivery increased by 1.71% to settle at $4,674.20 per ounce, after hitting a new high last week. Spot gold also saw gains, rising 1.6% to $4,668.14.
Silver mirrored this upward trend. U.S. silver futures for March delivery reached a record $93.035 per ounce and were last trading 5.06% higher at $93.02. The spot price for silver was up 3.55% at $93.16 per ounce.
A key catalyst for the market anxiety is President Donald Trump's announcement of new tariffs on goods from eight European countries. The administration has tied these tariffs to its demand for "the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland."
The proposed tariffs are set to begin at 10% on February 1 and could increase to 25% by June 1 if a deal is not reached. The threat has directly impacted European markets, with reports indicating that officials are considering retaliatory tariffs and other economic countermeasures.
In response, European and Asia-Pacific stock markets mostly declined on Monday. Shares of major European automakers and luxury goods companies fell sharply, with the Stoxx Europe 600 Automobiles & Parts Index dropping 2.2% and the Stoxx Europe Luxury 10 index down 2.9% in early trading.
The Greenland tariff dispute is just one of several factors contributing to the current risk-averse climate. Investors are also monitoring a range of other global flashpoints, including:
• Venezuela: The recent U.S. capture of the Venezuelan president and subsequent control of the nation's oil industry.
• Iran: Lingering tensions after President Trump suggested a military strike was imminent before backing away from the threat last week.
• U.S. Policy Uncertainty: A Justice Department criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is also unsettling markets, following sustained pressure from the president to lower interest rates.
• Ongoing Conflicts: The protracted conflict in Ukraine and the slow progress toward a resolution in Gaza continue to add to global instability.
According to George Cheveley, a natural resources portfolio manager at Ninety One, gold's powerful rally is grounded in solid fundamentals that remain firmly in place. In the asset manager's 2026 sectoral outlook, Cheveley noted that falling real interest rates and continued reserve diversification by central banks provide strong support for gold prices to either consolidate or move higher.
The report also highlighted that at current prices, profit margins for gold producers are expected to be four to five times higher than they were in 2024.
In contrast to precious metals, other base metals are seeing gains driven more by long-term structural trends than by immediate geopolitical fears. Copper, for instance, is considered to have an "attractive" risk-reward profile due to strong demand from the energy transition and data center infrastructure. U.S. copper futures for March were last trading 0.54% higher at $5.8625 per ounce.
The Kremlin confirmed on Monday that Russian President Vladimir Putin has been invited to join the "Board of Peace," a U.S.-led council created by President Donald Trump to address the Gaza conflict.
Moscow is now reviewing the proposal, which aims to bring international leaders together to maintain the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and manage the reconstruction of Gaza.

Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov announced that the offer was received through diplomatic channels and is under careful consideration.
"President Putin has indeed received an offer... to join this Board of Peace. We are currently studying all the details of this proposal," Peskov told the Russian state news agency TASS. He added, "We hope to contact the U.S. side to clarify all the details."
The invitation to Putin is particularly noteworthy given Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine, a conflict approaching its four-year mark that has resulted in hundreds of thousands of casualties.
The Trump administration has extended invitations to a number of other world leaders. According to a Bloomberg report, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Argentine President Javier Milei are among those invited.
AP News reported that Hungary, India, Jordan, Greece, Cyprus, and Pakistan have also confirmed receiving invitations.
However, membership may come at a steep cost. Citing a draft charter, Bloomberg noted that the Trump administration reportedly wants nations to pay $1 billion for a permanent position on the board.
The initiative is already facing pushback from key regional players. Israel has expressed its dissatisfaction with the board's formation, particularly its leadership structure.
On Friday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office released a statement clarifying its position: "The announcement regarding the composition of the Gaza Executive Board, which is subordinate to the Board of Peace, was not coordinated with Israel and runs contrary to its policy."
The "founding Executive Board" announced by the U.S. on Saturday includes former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair, Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, among others.
CNBC has contacted the White House for confirmation regarding Putin's invitation.
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has called a snap general election for February 8, centering her campaign on a bold promise to suspend the country's 8% consumption tax on food for two years. The proposal aims to tackle the rising cost of living but mirrors policies from her rivals and raises serious questions about Japan's already strained public finances.
Cutting the consumption tax, a move also advocated by several opposition parties, would carve a significant hole in government revenue. This comes as concerns over Japan's fiscal stability are already pushing government bond yields to their highest levels in decades.
Currently, Japan operates a dual-rate system, levying an 8% tax on food and a 10% tax on other goods and services to help fund the escalating social welfare costs of its rapidly aging population.
At a press conference, Takaichi argued that a two-year exemption on the 8% food levy would provide direct relief to households struggling with inflation. She insisted the government would not issue new debt to cover the shortfall, suggesting funds could be found by reviewing existing subsidies.
"We will overhaul past economic and fiscal policy," Takaichi stated. "My administration will put an end to an excessively tight fiscal policy and a lack of investment for the future."
Investors immediately reacted to the growing likelihood of a tax cut and Takaichi's commitment to expansionary fiscal policy. On Monday, the yield on the 10-year Japanese government bond surged to 2.275%, a 27-year high.
The move has drawn skepticism from economists who worry about its potential to backfire.
"I can't see why Japan needs a consumption tax cut after compiling a significant stimulus package to counter rising inflation," said Keiji Kanda, a senior economist at the Daiwa Institute of Research. "I'm worried these steps could accelerate inflation and lead to further rises in bond yields."
Takaichi's proposal enters a political arena where tax cuts have become a common theme. Mindful of public frustration over inflation, opposition parties have also called for the consumption tax to be reduced or eliminated.
A new political party, formed last week from a merger of two major opposition groups, has called for the 8% tax on food to be abolished permanently. In its campaign platform, the party suggested creating a new sovereign wealth fund to generate the necessary revenue. Other groups, including the Democratic Party for the People, have also demanded that the consumption tax be lowered.
The push for tax cuts comes as inflation has remained above the Bank of Japan's 2% target for nearly four years, largely driven by stubbornly high food prices.
Historically, Takaichi's ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) has resisted calls for consumption tax cuts, arguing that they would undermine market confidence in Japan's commitment to fiscal discipline.
The financial stakes are high. According to government data, scrapping the 8% food tax would cost an estimated 5 trillion yen ($31.71 billion) in annual revenue—an amount roughly equivalent to Japan's entire yearly budget for education.
Analysts warn that a permanent cut would put immense pressure on Japan's finances and heighten the risk of a bond selloff. These concerns are amplified by the fact that Takaichi's government has already compiled a record $783 billion budget for the next fiscal year, in addition to a major stimulus package designed to ease cost-of-living pressures.
($1 = 157.6900 yen)
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features
Log In
Sign Up