Trump Tells Hassett He May Want To Keep Him At White House

The European Union is exploring a radical overhaul of its decades-old membership process, considering a new "two-tier" system to potentially fast-track Ukraine's entry into the bloc. This move comes as Brussels seeks creative solutions to integrate Kyiv, possibly as a key component of a future peace deal to end the war with Russia.

The proposed model would effectively tear up the accession system used since the Cold War. Instead of a long, merit-based journey to full membership, Ukraine could be offered a "limited" or "reversed" membership first. Under this scenario, Kyiv would join the EU politically, with the full rights and obligations of a member state to be "earned" over a transitional period.

The flags of the European Union and Ukraine fly together, symbolizing a partnership that Brussels is now considering accelerating through unconventional new membership rules.

Why the Sudden Urgency?

Discussions have intensified after a 20-point peace plan, negotiated between the US, Ukraine, and the EU, reportedly included a target for Ukrainian EU membership by 2027. This has put pressure on officials to find a workable path forward, even if traditional standards are not yet met.

Proponents of the change argue that the current geopolitical landscape demands a new approach. One EU official noted, "We have to recognize that we are in a very different reality than when the (accession) rules were first drawn up."

An EU diplomat elaborated on this view, framing it as a matter of continental security. "It is Europe's interest to have Ukraine in the E.U., because of our own security," the diplomat said. "It is why we need to look for creative solutions."

Major Hurdles and Internal Opposition

Despite the push for creative solutions, the path to fast-tracking Ukraine's membership is lined with significant obstacles.

The Unanimity Requirement

Any new member requires the formal, unanimous approval of all 27 existing EU nations, including sign-off from their national parliaments. Several member states could prove difficult to persuade.

• Political Resistance: Countries seen as more "Russia-friendly," such as Hungary and Slovakia, which are heavily reliant on Russian energy, may oppose an accelerated timeline.

• Merit-Based Concerns: Many EU governments believe any fixed date is unrealistic. They argue that accession must remain a merit-based process, contingent on a candidate country aligning its laws with EU standards.

• Precedent and Economic Strain: A "staged access" plan for Ukraine could open the floodgates for other hopefuls who are not economically ready, potentially creating a significant drain on the rest of the Union.

Even Poland, a key ally of Ukraine, could pose an obstacle. The two neighbors have recently been involved in tense diplomatic disputes, highlighting that even regional partners may not automatically support a special exception.

A Broader Commitment to Ukraine

While membership rules are debated, the EU is already deepening its integration with Ukraine's defense sector. As Washington's support appears to have diminished, Brussels is stepping up.

Last November, the European Parliament approved a 1.5 billion euro ($1.7 billion) program aimed at strengthening ties between Europe's and Ukraine's military-industrial bases, signaling a continued and robust commitment to Kyiv's security, independent of the complex membership question.

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado is in Washington pressing her case for a democratic transition, but she faces a Trump administration that appears more focused on oil policy than free elections in the post-Maduro era.

Following a high-profile meeting with President Donald Trump, Machado voiced confidence that Venezuela would see an "orderly transition" away from what she described as a "criminal regime." However, the U.S. government has so far backed an interim government led by former Maduro loyalists, signaling a pragmatic approach to the nation's future.

A Push for Free Elections

Speaking at a press conference at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank with close ties to the administration, Machado insisted that a transition to free elections would eventually unfold. She argued that the "criminal structure" that has dominated Venezuela for years would dismantle itself, though she did not specify how this would occur.

"I am profoundly, profoundly confident that we will have an orderly transition," she stated, emphasizing that the process would be delicate and complex. Machado also downplayed any personal tension with interim President Delcy Rodriguez, framing the issue as a systemic one.

Figure 1: Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado speaks at a press conference at The Heritage Foundation in Washington.

Trump's Priority: Oil Access and Stability

Since a January 3 raid that removed Nicolas Maduro from power, the Trump administration has made its priorities clear. Gaining access to Venezuela's vast oil reserves and maintaining order have taken precedence over the immediate restoration of democracy.

Trump has thrown his support behind the interim government led by Rodriguez, which is composed of former Maduro loyalists. This move is seen as the administration's best bet for short-term stability in the OPEC nation.

Underscoring this engagement, CIA Director John Ratcliffe flew to Caracas for a meeting with Rodriguez, coinciding with Machado's visit to the White House. This represents the highest-level known U.S. visit since Maduro's ouster and signals a direct line of communication between Washington and the current interim leadership.

The Nobel Prize Gambit

During her Oval Office meeting, Machado made a strategic gesture by presenting her Nobel Peace Prize medal to President Trump, claiming he deserved it for his commitment to freedom for the Venezuelan people. Trump, who had openly sought the prize before Machado received it last month, praised the move on his Truth Social platform as a "wonderful gesture of mutual respect."

The White House later posted a photo of the two with Trump holding a framed display of the medal. This gesture comes after the Norwegian Nobel Institute clarified that the prize cannot be transferred, shared, or revoked.

Despite the warm reception, the White House has not changed its official stance. Trump had previously dismissed the idea of installing Machado to replace Maduro, who was taken to New York to face "narco-trafficking" charges. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt affirmed Trump's "realistic" assessment that Machado currently lacks the support needed to lead Venezuela in the short term, even as the president looked forward to their meeting.

President Donald Trump's focus on spheres of influence is radically reshaping the strategic outlook for critical minerals in 2026. This aggressive foreign policy, highlighted by actions in Venezuela and rhetoric on Greenland, risks using genuine supply chain security concerns as a pretext for geopolitical maneuvering.

On January 14, Trump announced he would personally negotiate agreements to secure mineral supplies. While ensuring reliable supply chains is a valid priority, the administration's methods raise concerns. A balanced strategy of international partnership and targeted market interventions can build resilience, but recent actions suggest a disregard for sovereignty and international law that could destabilize markets.

The Greenland Gambit: Mixing Policy and Minerals

The Trump administration's interest in acquiring Greenland is a prime example of how resource security is becoming entangled with foreign policy. While the White House has cited multiple security reasons, access to Greenland's mineral wealth is a key motivating factor, as prioritized in the December National Security Strategy (NSS).

Greenland holds significant deposits of rare earths and other critical minerals essential for US security projects like the F-35 fighter jet. Washington reportedly intervened last year to block the sale of a large project, rich in heavy rare earths and Gallium, to buyers with links to China.

However, the reality on the ground presents a different picture:

• Commercial Viability: Greenland's mining sector is years away from operating at a commercial scale.

• Operational Hurdles: The region is geologically challenging and difficult to develop.

• Existing Access: US companies can already access these resources without territorial control.

By challenging the island's sovereignty, the administration is creating political friction and driving a wedge between the US and its G7 and EU partners. This is happening at the exact moment their cooperation is needed for other critical mineral initiatives.

Price Floors and Unilateral Moves Strain Alliances

President Trump’s January 14 proclamation also floated the idea of using price floors and other trade restrictions for critical minerals. However, such measures are difficult to implement without the participation of allies in Europe and Asia. Current political tensions are setting back the diplomatic efforts required to build these alliances.

Other unilateral actions are also causing friction. In 2025, Trump signed Executive Order 14285 to fast-track domestic mining and assert US leadership in international waters. This move appears to bypass established frameworks like the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and the UN Convention on the Laws of the Sea (UNCLOS), which the US industry sees as too slow in creating regulations for extraction.

In response, traditional US partners are hedging against Washington's unilateralism. Non-US members of the G7 are expected to accelerate their Action Plan in 2026, focusing on developing standards-based markets, mobilizing capital, and investing in their own partnerships.

The Tense US-China Mineral Supply Chain

The relationship between the US and China is set to remain tense in 2026. However, an agreement reached by Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping in October 2025 may prevent a return to the severe export controls and tariffs that defined earlier disputes. China's past restrictions on rare earths served as a wake-up call for the US about its supply chain vulnerabilities.

For now, both nations seem unwilling to impose new, sweeping export bans on the most sensitive critical minerals, acknowledging the mutual costs and the difficulty of rerouting complex supply chains quickly.

Despite this, geopolitical tensions will continue to foster exclusionary practices in mineral markets. Governments are pressuring end-users to source materials from specific countries, and both the US and China will increasingly push their companies to avoid infrastructure funded by the other.

Why 'Critical Minerals' Isn't a Monolith

The long-term demand for minerals is driven by fundamental economic shifts, including the energy transition, digitization, and development in emerging markets. For example, building out Africa's energy infrastructure to EU or UK levels would require an estimated one billion metric tons of copper.

To succeed, the Trump administration must adopt a more nuanced understanding of individual mineral markets. Lumping all "critical minerals" together obscures their diverse risk profiles and can lead to ineffective policies that overshoot in some markets while undershooting in others.

The market dynamics in 2026 vary significantly by commodity:

• Nickel: A recent expansion in capacity has outpaced near-term demand from stainless steel and batteries, depressing prices and putting pressure on higher-cost producers.

• Lithium: New projects have come online faster than downstream capacity can absorb the production, leading to sharp price corrections despite strong long-term demand projections. Policy reversals on electric vehicle mandates have also weakened prices.

• Copper: This market faces a structural shortfall. Demand from EVs, data centers, and industrial electrification is accelerating while new supply is constrained by declining ore grades, project complexity, community opposition, and permitting delays.

Furthermore, labeling too many materials as "critical" dilutes strategic focus. The U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) list now includes 60 materials, covering about 80% of all mined elements. Not every mineral can be a top priority.

The Path Forward: Partnership Over Unilateralism

Beyond the headlines, the US in 2026 must navigate ongoing trends like resource nationalism in Africa and increased investment in mining by Gulf states, which will both compete with and complement Western interests.

Ultimately, working with international partners offers the most effective path for the US to secure its supply chains and compete in an increasingly complex world. President Trump's ambitions in Greenland must not be allowed to undermine the long-standing alliances that have been a cornerstone of American strength.

The Trump administration has finalized a major trade deal with Taiwan, lowering tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15% in exchange for a landmark $500 billion investment aimed at advancing the United States' technology sector. This move is set to reshape global tech alliances and semiconductor supply chains, particularly amid ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and China.

The Core of the Agreement

Under the new terms, the 15% tariff reduction on Taiwanese products takes effect immediately. This decision follows extensive negotiations between key entities, including the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).

The central component of the agreement is Taiwan's commitment to channel $500 billion into critical U.S. tech industries. This substantial investment is directly linked to the preferential tariff treatment.

Strategic Implications for US-Taiwan Relations

This trade deal significantly strengthens the partnership between the United States and Taiwan, a development that has drawn opposition from the Chinese government. The agreement positions Taiwan as a crucial strategic ally for the U.S. in both technology and global trade.

Cho Jung-tai, the Premier of Taiwan, highlighted the deal's importance, stating, "For the time being, we obtained the best tariff deal enjoyed by the countries with a trade surplus with the U.S. ... This also shows that the U.S. sees Taiwan as an important strategic partner."

Economic Impact on US Industries

The influx of capital is expected to energize the U.S. technology landscape, with a particular focus on stimulating the semiconductor and artificial intelligence (AI) sectors. This investment is anticipated to drive economic growth, foster innovation, and enhance America's technological capabilities.

Historically, similar trade and investment agreements have led to expansion and new employment opportunities within the tech industry.

Future Outlook and Global Trade Dynamics

While initial market reactions have been muted, the long-term effects of this deal could be profound. The tariff adjustment and massive investment are likely to trigger shifts in global trade flows, altering market shares and competitive dynamics. As the investment commitments are fulfilled, the deal is projected to provide a substantial boost to the American semiconductor and AI industries for years to come.

China chip challenges

‘Modern day Bell Labs’

Source:cnbc

A strong start to the year for the British pound, government bonds, and stocks is about to face its first major test with the release of critical economic data. While all three asset classes have posted gains, sterling is the most exposed to a potential downturn.

Upcoming inflation and unemployment figures could intensify bets on deeper interest-rate cuts from the Bank of England (BOE), creating significant headwinds for the currency. Despite the risk, the pound is currently on course for its fifth consecutive week of gains against a trade-weighted basket of currencies—its best performance since May.

"Inflation is clearly coming off the boil, likewise the UK labour market is weakening quite rapidly," noted Peter Kinsella, global head of FX strategy at Union Bancaire Privee. "That says to us that the BOE will have more flexibility to cut rates and that's going to weigh on sterling."

Sterling's Winning Streak Hangs in the Balance

Traders across bonds and equities will scrutinize the new data for clues on whether recent market momentum can continue. While figures showed the economy rebounded in November, real-time indicators from card spending and business confidence suggest a weak December. Furthermore, the market has yet to fully digest the impact of Chancellor Rachel Reeves' November budget, which increased taxes by £26 billion.

The upcoming UK Consumer Price Index (CPI) report is expected to show that inflation rose in December, following a significant drop in November. The BOE has anticipated this move and believes any price increases will be temporary, with the long-term trend pointing lower.

Easing price pressures would strengthen the case for the BOE to lower borrowing costs. This would likely lead to falling bond yields, removing a key pillar of support for the pound, which has benefited from the UK's relatively high yields.

Adding to the concern are the unemployment statistics due on Tuesday. A recent survey showed that UK employers reduced hiring this month, fueling fears of a rapidly cooling jobs market. According to Evelyne Gomez-Liechti, a multi-asset strategist at Mizuho International Plc, this data could be the "gunpowder markets need to price a more dovish BOE response."

Stretched Positioning Leaves the Pound Vulnerable

Analysts at Morgan Stanley have warned that stretched positioning makes the pound particularly susceptible to a downturn. They suggest sterling could deliver "the first big FX move of 2026" if the economic data comes in weaker than expected.

Figure 1: CFTC data reveals a sharp increase in speculative net long positions on the pound, making the currency vulnerable to a reversal if economic data disappoints.

Data from the CFTC shows that hedge funds and other speculators have significantly built up their bullish bets on the currency over the past month.

"The pound will be more sensitive to softer data than to strong," said Jane Foley, head of G10 FX strategy at Rabobank. She anticipates the currency will struggle to overcome a key technical resistance level of 0.8644 against the euro, its 200-day moving average.

The positive economic data for November, released Thursday, did little to support the pound, which ended the day down 0.3% on a trade-weighted basis. The rebound was partly driven by a one-off recovery at Jaguar Land Rover following a cyberattack, a factor unlikely to be repeated.

A Mixed Outlook for UK Stocks

The forecast for UK equities is more complex. The FTSE 100 has already gained 3% this year, rising above 10,000 points for the first time in history and capping its best year since 2009.

However, Barclays plc strategist Emmanuel Cau remains cautious, maintaining an underweight rating on UK stocks. He argues that companies with a domestic focus are vulnerable due to the nation's precarious fiscal situation. Meanwhile, the internationally-focused companies in the FTSE 100, often viewed as defensive investments, may eventually underperform their European counterparts.

Gilts Poised to Gain from Economic Weakness

For bond traders, signs of a weakening economy and increased wagers on rate cuts would be a bullish signal, potentially extending the strong start for UK government bonds, known as gilts. The BOE, along with the Federal Reserve, is one of three G-10 central banks expected to continue cutting rates this year.

"While the reported erosion in the UK government's fiscal buffer is a cause for concern, a complete wipe-out... isn't the base case. That buys the government time to set its fiscal house right, so there is no immediate risk for holders of gilts," explained Ven Ram, a macro strategist at Bloomberg Strategists.

This week, the 10-year gilt yield dropped to its lowest point since December 2024, and the two-year yield fell to a low not seen since August of that year. A Bloomberg index tracking gilts has risen 0.9%, marking its best start to a year since 2023.

David Roberts, co-portfolio manager of the Global Strategic Bond Fund at Nedgroup Investments, suggested that any volatility stemming from a poor showing by the Labour party in the May local elections could present a buying opportunity. "If gilts sell off for political reasons, without any real change in the economic fundamentals, we would likely take the other side of that move and go long the UK again," he said. Roberts recently took profits on UK bonds he purchased in August.