Trump Delays Plan to Seize Wages of Student Borrowers Amid Affordability Push

Source: Yahoo Finance

Federal Reserve Vice Chair Philip Jefferson indicated he supports holding interest rates steady at the central bank's upcoming January meeting, citing a "cautiously optimistic" outlook for the U.S. economy.

Speaking in Boca Raton, Florida, on Friday, Jefferson suggested that previous rate cuts have positioned monetary policy in a neutral range, allowing the Fed to adopt a more patient stance.

A 'Wait-and-See' Stance on Policy

In his first public comments on monetary policy since November, Jefferson argued that the current policy is appropriate for evaluating future economic data.

"The current policy stance leaves us well positioned to determine the extent and timing of additional adjustments to our policy rate based on the incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks," he stated.

This language closely mirrors the Fed's December post-meeting statement, which was widely interpreted as a signal that the central bank would pause its rate adjustments. The Fed's policy rate currently sits in a range of 3.50% to 3.75% following three consecutive quarter-point cuts. Jefferson was part of the 9-3 majority that voted for the last reduction in December.

He described last year's rate cuts as "the right step" to balance the risks of persistent inflation against the potential for a weakening labor market, adding, "This policy stance puts the economy in a good position moving forward."

Economic Outlook: Steady Growth and Cooling Inflation

Looking ahead, Jefferson laid out a stable forecast for the economy. He expects near-term growth to be around 2% and the unemployment rate to hold steady near its December level of 4.4%.

While acknowledging upside risks to inflation, he projected that it would return to a sustainable path toward the Fed's 2% target. He addressed the rise in core goods prices last year, attributing much of it to tariffs.

"It is a reasonable base case that the effects of tariffs on inflation will not be long-lasting—effectively, a one-time shift in the price level," Jefferson explained, noting that inflation expectations remain anchored.

Reflecting this sentiment, financial markets are currently pricing in only a 5% probability of another rate cut at the Fed's meeting on January 27-28.

Ukraine is dispatching a delegation to the United States to finalize crucial talks on security guarantees and a massive post-war recovery package, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy announced Friday. The Ukrainian leader expressed hope that the agreements could be formally signed at the World Economic Forum in Davos next week.

Speaking at a press conference in Kyiv alongside Czech President Petr Pavel, Zelenskiy highlighted that the discussions are also aimed at gaining clarity on Washington's perspective regarding Russia's stance on U.S.-backed peace initiatives to end the nearly four-year conflict.

"I think we have worked well with the American side, we are just not on the same side on some issues," Zelenskiy noted, alluding to the ongoing negotiations with Washington.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy outlined the goals for upcoming talks with the U.S. during a press conference in Kyiv.

High-Stakes Diplomacy Expected at Davos

The potential signing at Davos sets the stage for a high-profile diplomatic event. U.S. President Donald Trump told Reuters earlier this week that he might meet with Zelenskiy at the forum, a meeting the Ukrainian president has actively sought.

Ukrainian officials have stated the country needs an estimated $800 billion for its post-war reconstruction. Zelenskiy confirmed that Ukraine has completed its work on the documents for this "prosperity package" and the U.S. security guarantees, which are designed to deter future Russian aggression.

According to Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S., Olha Stefanishyna, senior Ukrainian officials were set to participate in bilateral talks in Miami on Friday to refine the two agreements. "The purpose of the visit is to refine these agreements with American partners," she wrote on Facebook, adding they "may be signed ... in Davos."

The delegation includes several key figures:

• Kyrylo Budanov, head of Zelenskiy's office

• Rustem Umerov, secretary of Ukraine's national security and defence council

• Davyd Arakhamia, head of Zelenskiy's parliamentary faction

Clashing Views on the Path to Peace

A key point of friction revolves around the framework for ending the war. Washington has encouraged Ukraine to agree to a peace framework to present to Moscow. Meanwhile, Kyiv and its European allies are focused on ensuring that any deal includes robust guarantees against future attacks from Russia.

"Ultimatums are not, in my view, a workable model for democratic relations between countries," Zelenskiy stated, without elaborating on the specific context of his comment.

The diplomatic landscape is further complicated by recent remarks from President Trump, who on Wednesday claimed that Russia was ready for a peace deal and positioned the Ukrainian leader as the primary obstacle. This assessment sharply contrasts with the views held by European leaders.

Russia's Actions Undermine Peace Talks, Zelenskiy Says

Zelenskiy firmly rejected the notion that he is stalling peace efforts. Instead, he pointed to Moscow's recent strikes on Ukraine's energy infrastructure as clear evidence of Russia's true intentions.

"Each of these strikes against our energy sector and our cities quite clearly shows Russia's real interests and intentions: they are not interested in agreements, but in the further destruction of Ukraine," he posted on social media following the press conference.

During the conference, Zelenskiy also made an urgent plea for more air defence ammunition to protect the country's power grid. He revealed that until a new aid package arrived on Friday morning, several of Ukraine's air defence systems had been left without missiles.

"We need to fight for these (aid) packages with blood, with people's lives," he told reporters.

As India prepares for its February 1 federal budget announcement, expectations are centered on continued fiscal consolidation, though the pace may slow. For equity markets, the budget is unlikely to offer significant near-term relief, with government finances once again leaning on a substantial dividend from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

Fiscal Deficit Targets Under Scrutiny

Analysts at Jefferies project the Indian government will aim for a fiscal deficit of approximately 4.2% of GDP in fiscal year 2027, a significant reduction from the 9.2% peak seen in FY21.

However, an alternative scenario is possible. If the government chooses to prioritize short-term economic growth, the deficit could be held closer to 4.4%. While this approach would likely benefit equities, it could also exert upward pressure on bond yields.

The Crucial Role of the RBI Dividend

The government's ability to meet its fiscal targets, especially amidst weaker tax collections, is expected to be bolstered by the RBI. Jefferies estimates the central bank's dividend for FY27 could increase by 10% to 15%, reaching around Rs 3 trillion, partly aided by rupee depreciation.

Capex Priorities: Defence Leads the Way

Government capital expenditure is forecast to grow by about 12% in FY27, totaling Rs 12.5 trillion. The allocation, however, reveals a clear strategic priority.

• Defence Capex: Spending in this sector could rise by approximately 25%, building on the 57% year-to-date growth in FY26.

• Non-Defence Capex: Growth is expected to slow considerably, falling into the 5% to 10% range.

Potential Pay Hikes and Their Fiscal Impact

The budget may also address long-delayed pay hikes for central government employees, linked to the next Central Pay Commission. According to Jefferies, salary increases for central government staff alone could widen the fiscal deficit by 20 to 30 basis points of GDP. The combined effect, including state-level adjustments, could reach as high as 100 basis points over a two-year period.

Key Market and Sector Implications

Investors will be closely watching for specific policy measures that could sway market sentiment and channel funds into key sectors.

Any relief on capital gains for select foreign portfolio investors would be a clear positive for the stock market. Conversely, measures designed to boost bank deposits, such as new tax incentives, would support the banking sector but could be a negative for equities by diverting investment flows.

Key areas to monitor in the budget include:

• Defence: Allocations will be a major focus.

• Manufacturing: Funding for the mobile manufacturing Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme.

• Renewable Energy: Support for the PM Kusum programme.

• Consumer Goods: Any pay-related measures that could lift demand for consumer durables and vehicles.

A new trade agreement between Canada and China is drawing sharp criticism from Washington, with top US officials warning that Ottawa will regret its decision to allow a limited number of Chinese-made electric vehicles into its market. The move is seen by the Trump administration as a potential threat to the North American auto industry.

"I think they'll look back at this decision and surely regret it to bring Chinese cars into their market," US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy stated on Friday during an event at a Ford factory in Ohio.

The Details of the New Trade Pact

The controversy stems from an announcement by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in Beijing. The new deal permits up to 49,000 Chinese EVs to enter Canada under a 6.1% most-favoured-nation tariff. This marks a sharp reversal from Canada's 2024 policy, which imposed a 100% tariff on Chinese EVs, aligning with a similar US measure.

The agreement has sparked alarm in Washington, with officials concerned it could give China a strategic foothold in the North American auto market, even as the US intensifies its hardline stance on vehicle and parts imports.

As part of the broader trade agreements, Carney also announced that he expects China to lower its tariffs on Canadian canola seed to approximately 15% by March 1, a significant reduction from the current 85%.

Washington's Official Response

US officials have been clear that while they disapprove of the deal, the vehicles are not expected to cross the border into the United States.

"Those cars are going to Canada – they're not coming here," said US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, adding that he does not anticipate the deal will disrupt American vehicle exports to Canada.

Despite this, Greer labeled Canada's decision "problematic" in a separate interview with CNBC. "There's a reason why we don't sell a lot of Chinese cars in the United States," he explained. "It's because we have tariffs to protect American auto workers and Americans from those vehicles."

Greer also expressed skepticism about the canola seed agreement, predicting, "I think in the long run, they're not going to like having made that deal."

Cybersecurity as a Key Barrier

Greer highlighted that US regulations present a significant obstacle for Chinese vehicles. He pointed to rules established in January 2025 governing the cybersecurity of internet-connected vehicles and their navigation systems.

"I think it would be hard for them to operate here," Greer commented. "There are rules and regulations in place in America about the cybersecurity of our vehicles and the systems that go into those, so I think it might be hard for the Chinese to comply with those kind of rules."

Bipartisan Opposition to Chinese Vehicles

While President Donald Trump has previously expressed interest in having Chinese automakers build vehicles in the US, there is strong, bipartisan opposition from lawmakers. Major American car manufacturers have also warned that China poses a threat to the domestic auto sector.

This sentiment was echoed at the Ohio event, where Republican Senator Bernie Moreno received applause for his firm stance.

"As long as I have air in my body, there will not be Chinese vehicles sold in the United States of America — period," Moreno declared.

The Canadian Embassy in Washington has not yet provided a comment on the matter.

Greenland's 57,000 inhabitants are navigating a tense geopolitical landscape as U.S. President Donald Trump publicly pursues the acquisition of their vast Arctic island. Faced with the ambitions of a global superpower, many residents express a sense of helplessness, balanced by a cautious hope in a growing international response.

The situation has prompted an unusual military and diplomatic scramble, with European allies and U.S. lawmakers stepping into the fray.

European Troops Arrive in Nuuk

In a direct response to Trump's stated goal of taking control of Greenland "one way or the other," a handful of European countries, including France and Germany, have deployed a modest number of military personnel to the autonomous Danish territory.

Though no U.S. soldiers are part of this contingent, the European presence has been welcomed by locals in the capital, Nuuk.

"I feel safer," said Marie Sofie Pedersen, a local social worker. "I hope they won't stay here forever, but just as long as we're vulnerable and something could happen."

The deployment comes as Trump criticizes Denmark for not sufficiently ensuring Greenland's security, a claim made despite the island being protected under NATO's collective defense treaty. The advance troops are preparing for future Danish-led military exercises in the Arctic.

Local sentiment reflects a desire for solidarity. "We have to stay together in Europe," a 39-year-old union representative told AFP. "Otherwise, the Americans will crush us. We are not big enough, but together, we will be."

Greenland's deputy prime minister, Mute Egede, confirmed on Wednesday that more NATO activity is expected, stating, "There will be more military flights and ships."

Diplomatic Talks Falter as Tensions Rise

The military movements coincide with a diplomatic stalemate. Recent talks at the White House involving Danish, Greenlandic, and U.S. officials failed to resolve the core differences between Washington and its allies over the island's future.

Experts characterize the European military deployment as "strategic signaling" to the United States. However, the White House appears unmoved.

"I don't think troops in Europe impact the president's decision-making process, nor does it impact his goal of the acquisition of Greenland at all," Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Thursday.

U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski speaks to the press amid rising geopolitical tensions over Greenland's future.

Adding another layer to the political maneuvering, a bipartisan U.S. congressional delegation began a visit to Copenhagen on Friday. The group, set to meet with both Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and her Greenlandic counterpart, aims to voice support for Denmark and Greenland.

This visit has provided a source of hope for some. "Congress would never approve of a military action in Greenland," the union activist said. "If people in Congress want to save their own democracy, they have to step up."

Independence Ambitions on Hold

The crisis has forced a dramatic shift in Greenland's domestic politics, temporarily sidelining its long-held ambition for full independence from Denmark after three centuries of sovereignty.

Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen stated that now is not the time for such a move. "We are now facing a geopolitical crisis," he said, clarifying that if forced to choose between the U.S. and Denmark, "We choose Denmark."

However, not all Greenlanders oppose Trump's interest. Julio Sandsteen, an unemployed resident of Nuuk, voiced his support for an American takeover.

"The Americans have protected the island for a long time. The Danes can't do it," he said. "Trump wants to have Greenland? I love it."