• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
ASK
BID
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6917.82
6917.82
6917.82
6993.09
6862.05
-58.62
-0.84%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
49240.98
49240.98
49240.98
49653.13
48832.78
-166.67
-0.34%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23255.18
23255.18
23255.18
23691.60
23027.21
-336.92
-1.43%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
97.240
97.320
97.240
97.300
97.140
+0.040
+ 0.04%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.18249
1.18259
1.18249
1.18377
1.18075
+0.00074
+ 0.06%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.37198
1.37209
1.37198
1.37328
1.36821
+0.00234
+ 0.17%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
5061.78
5062.21
5061.78
5091.84
4910.07
+115.53
+ 2.34%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
62.836
62.866
62.836
63.865
62.685
-0.798
-1.25%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

Finance Minister: Indonesia's Tax Revenues Jump In January

Share

Fitch Sees Poland's Deficit At Around 7% Of GDP In 2026

Share

Santander BP CEO Says Bank Is Reviewing Its Strategy But Does Not Expect Major Changes

Share

Venezuela Top Economic Advisor Ortega: Want Venezuela To Be Known As A Country With One Of The Highest Oil Production Levels

Share

Russian Finance Ministry To Cut Forex Sales To 11.9 Billion Roubles A Day From February 6

Share

South Korea Parliament To Finalise Bill On US Investment Fund By March 9

Share

USA S&P 500 E-Mini Futures Up 0.05%, NASDAQ 100 Futures Down 0.11%, Dow Futures Up 0.17%

Share

Palestinian Officials: Israeli Strikes Kill 18 In Gaza, Patient Crossings At Rafah Halted

Share

Cores - Spain December Crude Oil Imports Falls 4.9% Year-On-Year To 5.3 Million Tonnes

Share

Economic Affairs Secretary: India To Ensure Its Record Borrowing Plan Doesn't Disturb Markets

Share

China Finance Ministry: To Issue 14 Billion Yuan Of Treasury Bonds In Hong Kong On Feb 11

Share

Swedish Central Bank Governor Thedeen:-, My Assessment Is That The Likelihoodof Very Restrictive Trade Barriers Is Nevertheless Limited

Share

Swedish Central Bank Governor Thedeen:-The Greenland Crisis Hascreated Renewed Uncertainty Regarding The Rules That Will Apply To Our Economicexchanges With The United States

Share

Swedish Central Bank's Seim: I Assess That The Increased Uncertainty Reduces The Risk Of Demand Driven Inflation In Sweden Somewhat

Share

Swedish Central Bank's Deputy Governor Bunge: Will Probably Have To Monitor Both Whether The Strengthening Of The Krona Continues And Its Impact On Prices

Share

Iceland's Central Bank: Further Decisions To Lower Interest Rates Will Depend On Clear Evidence That Inflation Is Falling Back To Bank's 2½% Inflation Target

Share

Swedish Central Bank Governor Thedeen:-At Present I Assess That Monetarypolicy Is Following A Stable And Reasonable Course

Share

Icelandic Central Bank Key Interest Rate Unchanged At 7.25 Percent

Share

Regional Official: Regional Invitees To Istanbul Talks Were Discussed With Iran During Planning Process

Share

Regional Official: Iran Has Said From The Start That It Will Only Discuss With US Its Nuclear Programme, Americans Wanted Other Issues On Agenda

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
Australia Overnight (Borrowing) Key Rate

A:--

F: --

P: --

RBA Rate Statement
Japan 10-Year Note Auction Yield

A:--

F: --

P: --

The U.S. House of Representatives voted on a short-term spending bill to end the partial government shutdown.
Saudi Arabia IHS Markit Composite PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

RBA Press Conference
Turkey PPI YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Turkey CPI YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Turkey CPI YoY (Excl. Energy, Food, Beverage, Tobacco & Gold) (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. 10-Year Note Auction Yield

A:--

F: --

P: --

Richmond Federal Reserve President Barkin delivered a speech.
U.S. Weekly Redbook Index YoY

A:--

F: --

P: --

Mexico Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. API Weekly Refined Oil Stocks

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. API Weekly Gasoline Stocks

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. API Weekly Cushing Crude Oil Stocks

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. API Weekly Crude Oil Stocks

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan IHS Markit Services PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan IHS Markit Composite PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Caixin Services PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Caixin Composite PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India HSBC Services PMI Final (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India IHS Markit Composite PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Russia IHS Markit Services PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Africa IHS Markit Composite PMI (SA) (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Italy Services PMI (SA) (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Italy Composite PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany Composite PMI Final (SA) (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Composite PMI Final (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Services PMI Final (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Composite PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Total Reserve Assets (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Services PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Official Reserves Changes (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Core CPI Prelim YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Core HICP Prelim YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone PPI MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone HICP Prelim YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Core HICP Prelim MoM (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Italy HICP Prelim YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Core CPI Prelim MoM (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone PPI YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. MBA Mortgage Application Activity Index WoW

--

F: --

P: --

Brazil IHS Markit Composite PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Brazil IHS Markit Services PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ADP Employment (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

The U.S. Treasury Department released its quarterly refinancing statement.
U.S. IHS Markit Composite PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. IHS Markit Services PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Non-Manufacturing Price Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Non-Manufacturing Employment Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Non-Manufacturing New Orders Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Non-Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Non-Manufacturing Inventories Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Oil Imports Changes

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Demand Projected by Production

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Weekly Heating Oil Stock Changes

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Weekly Gasoline Stocks Change

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Weekly Crude Stocks Change

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Weekly Cushing, Oklahoma Crude Oil Stocks Change

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Trade Balance (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    McOkanz flag
    Visxa Benfica
    @Visxa Benfica 😂🤣😂😂 That’s why it’s 50/50
    McOkanz flag
    @Sarkar
    📈 (#XAUUSD) BUY NOW 5075/5073 First Round TAKE PROFIT 5080 TAKE PROFIT 5085 TAKE PROFIT 5090 ❌ STOP LOSS 5065 USE IT GYUS  BEST SIGNAL FOR NOW
    @@Sarkar if Gold didn’t break 5100 I refuse to take any trade My choice thou
    Size flag
    Tomasodoma
    just got stumbed out at 5600
    @TomasodomaHow do you mean exactly? Price hasn’t traded up to 5600 yet.
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    Tomasodoma
    @TomasodomaWell i say we wait together i can see the current market price is 5091 we should first hope for 5100 violation then we look for more nuys
    Visxa Benfica flag
    McOkanz
    @McOkanzHuge volume bro
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    McOkanz
    @McOkanz Yes my choice too, failure to break 5100 then we sit tight
    Visxa Benfica flag
    This is definitely a liquidity grab + extremely strong CHOCH on H4/D1, no joke
    Koentjoro flag
    gold ready
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    Koentjoro
    gold ready
    @Koentjoro Gold is ready, Set and Go! Where are you looking to target?
    Tomasodoma flag
    SlowBear ⛅
    @SlowBear ⛅
    Visxa Benfica flag
    Koentjoro
    gold ready
    @Koentjoro I see many people are expecting gold to return to an upward trend
    Visxa Benfica flag
    @Koentjoro Are you following an uptrend or a downtrend?
    McOkanz flag
    SlowBear ⛅
    @SlowBear ⛅ Excatly the way I see market At least patience isn’t bad
    SMART FX flag
    Friends, the market is giving a lot of fake breakouts, trade carefully.
    "Visxa Benfica" recalled a message
    Visxa Benfica flag
    @McOkanzI think the 87-88 area that I mentioned as strong support the other day has now officially been affected by a market structure shift
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    Tomasodoma
    @Tomasodoma How long have you been trading Gold bro?
    McOkanz flag
    SlowBear ⛅
    @SlowBear ⛅ I started trading silver this year And I’ve only lose a single trade due to mistake in my Sl Others have been profitable
    Koentjoro flag
    5053 ... up
    Visxa Benfica flag
    Now it has become the new demand zone buddy
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Broker API

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Broker API

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          New START On The Brink And The Global Risks Of A World Without Nuclear Limits

          Gerik

          Political

          Summary:

          The imminent expiration of the New START treaty between the United States and Russia threatens to leave the world without any binding limits on the two largest nuclear arsenals...

          The End Of The Last Nuclear Constraint

          The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, widely known as New START, is set to expire on February 5, marking a potentially historic rupture in global nuclear governance. If no last-minute intervention occurs, this will be the first time in decades that there is no legally binding framework limiting the strategic nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia, the two countries that together possess roughly 90 percent of the world’s nuclear warheads.
          New START was signed in 2010 and caps each side at 1,550 deployed strategic nuclear warheads, alongside strict limits on intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and heavy bombers. Beyond numerical ceilings, the treaty has functioned as a cornerstone of strategic transparency, enabling hundreds of on-site inspections and tens of thousands of data exchanges over more than a decade. These mechanisms have reduced uncertainty and lowered the risk of miscalculation, even during periods of political tension.

          A Treaty Hollowed Out Before Its Expiry

          Although New START technically remains in force until early February, its practical effectiveness has already been eroded. Inspection mechanisms have been suspended since 2023, weakening mutual confidence and verification. Donald Trump has recently signaled a willingness to let the treaty lapse, while Moscow has stated that it is prepared for a new strategic reality in which no formal limits exist on nuclear forces.
          From Russia’s perspective, the lack of response from Washington to proposals for maintaining warhead ceilings is interpreted as a clear political signal. The result is a transition not caused by a single decision, but by a gradual breakdown of trust and compliance that now culminates in formal expiration.

          China’s Role In Shaping US Calculations

          While New START is a bilateral treaty, analysts argue that China has become the central factor shaping US reluctance to preserve it. Washington’s concern increasingly lies not with Russia’s existing arsenal, but with the rapid expansion of China’s nuclear forces and the strategic flexibility this creates for Beijing.
          China has rejected calls for trilateral nuclear arms control talks, arguing that the disparity between its arsenal and those of the US and Russia makes such a framework inherently unfair. On February 3, Beijing urged Washington to respond constructively to Russia’s proposal to maintain limits on deployed warheads, while reiterating that it would not join three-party negotiations.
          Data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute indicates that China currently possesses at least 600 nuclear warheads and has been adding roughly 100 warheads per year since 2023, the fastest expansion rate globally. By comparison, the United States holds around 3,700 warheads in its military stockpile, while Russia has more than 4,300.

          Strategic Shifts In Beijing

          China’s longer-term trajectory reinforces these concerns. Recommendations linked to its 15th Five-Year Plan for the 2026–2030 period emphasize strengthening strategic deterrence, signaling continued modernization and expansion of nuclear forces. While detailed targets are expected to be clarified when the plan is formally approved in March 2026, the direction suggests an intent to narrow the gap with the two established nuclear superpowers.
          This evolution reflects correlation rather than direct causation between China’s buildup and the collapse of New START, yet the interaction between these dynamics is clear. US policymakers want to retain room to adjust their own deployed warhead numbers, a flexibility constrained under the treaty’s current limits.

          The Risk Of A Three-Way Arms Race

          Analysts warn that the collapse of New START could trigger a chain reaction of strategic escalation. The United States could increase the number of warheads mounted on existing missile systems, while Russia may accelerate development of unconventional nuclear delivery platforms, including nuclear-powered cruise missiles or long-range nuclear torpedoes. These systems carry heightened environmental and security risks and further complicate deterrence calculations.
          China’s limited transparency regarding its nuclear program adds another layer of uncertainty. This opacity feeds suspicion in Washington, prompting defensive responses that Beijing then interprets as additional threats. The resulting feedback loop risks entrenching a three-sided arms race without the stabilizing guardrails that characterized much of the Cold War era.
          Experts in Australia and Europe caution that such a race would be inherently more unstable than past US–Soviet competition, precisely because it would lack robust mechanisms for verification, communication, and crisis management.

          A Breakdown Of A Long-Standing Architecture

          From the SALT agreements of the 1970s to the START framework that followed the Cold War, US–Russian nuclear arms control has underpinned global strategic stability for decades. However, key pillars of this architecture have already fallen. The ABM and INF treaties collapsed in the past two decades, leaving New START as the final major restraint.
          Its expiration would therefore represent not just the end of a single treaty, but the dismantling of an entire system of nuclear risk management. In a world already marked by multiple geopolitical flashpoints and intensifying great-power competition, the absence of any legal limits on nuclear arsenals is widely viewed as a significant setback for global security.

          An Uneasy Global Outlook

          Without New START, the risk of nuclear proliferation increases, and so does the danger of miscalculation during crises. The loss of transparency and predictability raises the probability that worst-case assumptions will drive decision-making. While no actor openly seeks such an outcome, the convergence of strategic rivalry, declining trust, and expanding arsenals creates conditions in which stability becomes harder to sustain.
          As New START approaches its expiration, the world stands at the edge of a new nuclear era defined less by negotiated restraint and more by strategic ambiguity, a shift that carries profound implications for international security.
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          China’s Economy Stumbles At The Start Of 2026 As PMI Data Signals Broad-Based Weakness

          Gerik

          Economic

          A Weak Start Revealed By Official PMI Data

          China’s economy has begun 2026 on a fragile footing, with new official data pointing to a sharper-than-expected slowdown in activity. According to figures released by the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the official manufacturing purchasing managers’ index fell to 49.3 in January from 50.1 in December, undershooting economists’ consensus forecast of 50.1. A reading below 50 indicates contraction, signaling that factory activity has slipped back into decline.
          This data release marks the first official snapshot of China’s economic health this year and follows a deceleration in fourth-quarter growth in 2025 to its weakest pace since the post-Covid reopening period. The January PMI print suggests that momentum has not stabilized and that the industrial sector remains under pressure despite last year’s strong export performance.

          Non-Manufacturing Sectors Also Lose Momentum

          More concerning for policymakers and investors alike is that the slowdown is not confined to manufacturing. The non-manufacturing PMI, which covers construction and services, dropped to 49.4 from 50.2 in December. This was not only below market expectations of 50.3 but also marked the lowest reading since December 2022.
          The decline in services and construction activity indicates that weakness is spreading across multiple pillars of the economy. Rather than reflecting a narrow industrial adjustment, the data points to a broader cooling in domestic demand, reinforcing fears that consumption and investment have yet to recover in a meaningful and sustained way.

          Beyond Seasonal Factors

          Economists caution that the sharp deterioration in January cannot be fully explained by seasonal distortions linked to the Lunar New Year. While holiday-related disruptions often affect activity data at the start of the year, the magnitude and breadth of the decline suggest a more fundamental imbalance between supply and demand.
          Business confidence has weakened noticeably, amplifying downside risks. Analysts interpret this as a clear signal that policy support may need to be strengthened to stabilize expectations and prevent further erosion in corporate sentiment. The relationship here reflects correlation rather than simple causation, as falling confidence both influences and responds to softer economic conditions.

          Exports Carry The Load As Domestic Demand Falters

          China managed to meet its official growth target of around 5 percent in 2025, largely thanks to a record trade surplus that offset declines in private consumption and investment. However, this export-led support has also intensified global trade frictions and left the economy more exposed to external shocks.
          As domestic demand remains weak, manufacturing prospects are becoming increasingly dependent on overseas markets. This reliance creates vulnerabilities at a time when protectionist pressures are rising and trade relations remain strained, limiting the reliability of exports as a long-term growth engine.

          Shifting Growth Priorities In Beijing

          Looking ahead, expectations for 2026 have turned more cautious. Policymakers in Beijing are widely believed to be considering a more flexible stance on growth, with speculation that China could lower its national growth target for the first time in four years.
          Xi Jinping has recently signaled greater tolerance for slower growth in certain regions while emphasizing the need to rein in what he described as “reckless” projects. This messaging reflects a clearer prioritization of growth quality over speed, suggesting a strategic recalibration rather than an abrupt policy pivot.
          At the regional level, more than a dozen provinces, including Guangdong, China’s largest manufacturing and technology hub, have already lowered their growth targets for 2026. Economists surveyed now expect China’s GDP to expand by around 4.5 percent this year, down from last year’s pace.

          Policy Expectations And Lingering Constraints

          In monetary policy, markets anticipate that the People's Bank of China may cut banks’ reserve requirement ratio by about 25 basis points in the first quarter. This would be a more modest move than previously expected, reflecting the central bank’s continued preference for targeted easing rather than broad-based stimulus.
          However, without large-scale fiscal or monetary support, analysts warn that China may struggle to break out of an uneven growth pattern. Structural challenges persist, including local government debt risks and mounting trade protectionism from global partners, extending beyond advanced economies to include emerging markets such as South Africa.
          Taken together, January’s PMI data paints a sobering picture of China’s economic trajectory at the start of the year. The unexpected contraction across both manufacturing and services underscores how fragile the recovery remains. While policymakers appear willing to accept slower growth in pursuit of longer-term stability, the absence of stronger stimulus measures could leave the economy vulnerable to further downside risks as 2026 unfolds.
          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          China's Plan to Unlock Domestic Consumer Power

          Owen Li

          Economic

          Remarks of Officials

          Central Bank

          China is launching a major push to build a unified national market, a strategic pivot designed to unleash domestic consumption and power its next phase of growth, a top economic official announced.

          Speaking at an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meeting in Shanghai, Vice Finance Minister Liao Min outlined the country's plan to shift toward new, demand-driven growth drivers. This move comes as economies across Asia navigate a "pivotal juncture" in the global economic landscape.

          "We are pressing ahead with building a unified market to further unleash domestic demand and consumption potential," Liao stated, highlighting that services consumption is already showing strong momentum. "The Chinese economy will be increasingly demand-driven."

          Why the Old Export-Led Model Is Breaking Down

          This strategic shift addresses growing unsustainability in China's economic model. While the country met its 5% growth target last year, the expansion was lopsided. Exports accounted for a third of the growth, while domestic demand remained sluggish.

          This reliance on exports is becoming increasingly precarious amid rising global protectionism. Internally, the model has fueled issues like industrial overcapacity and prolonged price wars, which have intensified trade tensions with global partners. Beijing has now officially designated boosting domestic demand as its top economic priority for the year.

          Dismantling Barriers to Fuel Consumption

          The core of the new strategy involves dismantling long-standing local protectionism and inter-provincial trade barriers. Chinese authorities have repeatedly identified these internal obstacles as key factors that suppress consumption and distort the market.

          To reassure trading partners concerned about a flood of Chinese goods, the government also announced it will cancel or reduce tax rebates on hundreds of products, including solar cells and batteries, starting April 1. This measure is part of a broader effort to manage excess manufacturing capacity.

          Recent Stimulus and Policy Support

          In support of this new focus, Chinese authorities have already rolled out several targeted measures to stimulate consumption and investment. These initial steps include:

          • Public Spending: An initial plan worth US$51 billion (RM200.56 billion) for investment in key national projects.

          • Consumer Subsidies: Financial support for a consumer goods trade-in program.

          • Monetary Easing: The People's Bank of China delivered a 25-basis-point cut to interest rates on its structural monetary policy tools.

          • Credit Incentives: The Ministry of Finance unveiled a series of loan perks to encourage borrowing by both businesses and consumers.

          Navigating Domestic Headwinds and Global Risks

          Despite these efforts, significant challenges remain. There is growing expectation that Beijing will lower its national economic growth target this year, reflecting entrenched deflation, a multi-year housing slump, and weak corporate and household confidence.

          Concerns over debt risks and thinning profit margins at banks will also likely prevent policymakers from deploying more aggressive, large-scale stimulus. This cautious sentiment is already being reflected at the local level, with over a dozen Chinese provinces reducing their economic growth targets for 2026 after President Xi Jinping signaled greater tolerance for slower expansion and warned against wasteful investment.

          In his speech, Liao acknowledged the complex global environment, citing ongoing volatility, rising geopolitical tensions, and supply-chain disruptions. However, he emphasized that the Asia-Pacific remains one of the world's fastest-growing regions, with technology and digital transformation unlocking tremendous economic potential despite "persistent headwinds."

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Gold Reclaims $5,000 As Volatility Persists And Long-Term Bullish Forecasts Hold

          Gerik

          Economic

          Commodity

          Gold Surges After Historic Sell-Off

          Gold prices extended gains for a second consecutive session, reclaiming the $5,000 per ounce threshold as investors moved back into the market following an unusually sharp correction from record highs. In early trading on February 4, gold rose as much as 2.1 percent, adding to a surge of more than 6 percent in the previous session. At around 8:12 a.m. Vietnam time, spot gold was trading at $5,048.55 per ounce.
          Silver followed a similar trajectory, climbing 2.1 percent to $86.90 per ounce, while platinum and palladium also recorded gains. The synchronized rebound across precious metals suggests a return of risk tolerance rather than isolated technical buying in gold alone.

          Market Volatility And Investor Positioning

          According to Daniel Ghali, senior commodity strategist at TD Securities, the forced liquidation phase that recently swept through precious metals markets appears to have largely passed. However, he cautioned that the extreme volatility seen over the past week may prompt many retail investors to temporarily step back, reducing demand from a segment that has become increasingly influential in driving price momentum.
          This reflects a correlation between heightened price swings and short-term investor caution rather than a fundamental shift in gold’s underlying investment appeal.

          Speculation And Structural Drivers Behind The Rally

          Gold’s sharp rise last month was fueled by a combination of speculative momentum, geopolitical uncertainty, and growing concerns over the independence of the US Federal Reserve. These factors contributed to aggressive positioning across futures, options, and leveraged exchange-traded funds, amplifying price movements.
          China-based investment funds and Western retail investors accumulated substantial positions, while strong inflows into leveraged ETFs and a wave of call option buying further intensified the rally. However, the pace of gains became increasingly difficult to sustain, setting the stage for a sudden reversal.

          The Correction And Its Aftershocks

          Market participants had warned that the rally was unfolding too quickly. That caution proved prescient late last week, when the upward momentum abruptly stalled. Silver experienced its largest single-day drop on record, while gold posted its steepest decline since 2013. The initial sell-off during the Asian trading session on January 30 quickly spilled over into subsequent sessions, reinforcing the sense of fragility beneath the market’s rapid ascent.
          Despite the severity of the pullback, the speed of the rebound suggests that underlying demand has not evaporated, but rather paused as positions were recalibrated.

          Outlook Remains Firm Despite Ongoing Swings

          Looking ahead, analysts expect volatility in precious metals to remain elevated. Bank of America Corp. has warned that sharp price fluctuations are likely to persist, though it maintains a more constructive long-term view on gold than on silver. Niklas Westermark, head of commodity trading for EMEA at Bank of America, noted that gold’s investment narrative is structurally stronger and more resilient.
          While elevated prices and market turbulence may limit the size of individual positions, this is unlikely to diminish overall investor interest. Several major banks continue to project further upside, with Deutsche Bank AG reiterating its forecast that gold prices could ultimately reach $6,000 per ounce.
          Taken together, the latest rebound highlights a market adjusting to excesses rather than abandoning its bullish thesis. Gold’s return above $5,000 underscores its role as both a speculative asset and a long-term store of value in an environment marked by uncertainty and shifting monetary expectations.
          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump's US-India Trade Deal: A Global Power Shift?

          King Ten

          Russia-Ukraine Conflict

          Energy

          Remarks of Officials

          Economic

          Political

          Donald Trump announced a landmark trade deal between the United States and India on Monday, outlining terms that could significantly reshape economic and geopolitical alignments. While Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi confirmed an agreement had been reached, he stopped short of validating the specific details Trump shared.

          According to Trump’s statement, the deal involves the U.S. lowering tariffs on Indian imports to 18%, while India would eliminate its tariffs on U.S. imports entirely. He also claimed Modi agreed to cease purchasing Russian oil, replacing it with supplies from the U.S. and potentially Venezuela. Furthermore, Trump said India committed to buying $500 billion in American energy, technology, agricultural goods, and other products.

          However, this announcement warrants caution, as Trump incorrectly claimed late last year that India had already halted Russian oil purchases. If his account of the new deal is accurate this time, the agreement would be truly historic.

          Economic Shockwaves for India's Agricultural Sector

          The potential domestic impact on India could be profound. With 42% of the Indian population employed in agriculture, the arrival of tariff-free U.S. agricultural products could threaten the livelihoods of millions. Such a disruption could trigger a mass migration from rural areas to cities, potentially leading to significant socio-economic turbulence and political unrest if not managed carefully.

          Prime Minister Modi may be calculating that this risk is worth taking. Increased investment from the U.S. and the EU—which secured its own trade deal with India last month—could create new employment opportunities to offset the agricultural displacement. This high-stakes gamble appears to be driven by a combination of macroeconomic ambitions and pressing security concerns.

          Why Modi Might Accept a High-Stakes Gamble

          The motivations behind India's potential concessions seem to be threefold: accelerating economic growth, reasserting regional dominance, and responding to geo-economic pressures.

          From a macroeconomic perspective, the deal aims to supercharge India's GDP, which was already projected to grow by 7.4% this year despite existing 50% U.S. tariffs. This could help India achieve its goal of becoming the world's third-largest economy by 2030 or even sooner.

          On the regional security front, the agreement would restore India's status as the primary U.S. partner in South Asia, a position recently challenged by rival Pakistan. This move could preempt a scenario where the U.S. might use Pakistan and its partner Bangladesh to undermine India's rise.

          Geo-economically, India has been navigating a complex landscape. The punitive 25% U.S. tariffs for importing discounted Russian oil are becoming increasingly costly. With the U.S. now offering similarly priced Venezuelan oil as an alternative, the calculus may have shifted. Simultaneously, threatened U.S. sanctions related to business with Iran, coupled with concerns over that country's stability, have made the North-South Transport Corridor through Iran to Russia an unviable option for now. This economic pressure likely pushed India toward prioritizing a deal with the U.S.

          Ripple Effects for Russia, China, and BRICS

          If the details announced by Trump hold true, it signals that India is recalibrating its grand strategy toward the West, largely as a result of economic coercion. This pivot could have several major international implications:

          • A reduced strategic focus on the BRICS alliance.

          • A slowdown in efforts to diversify away from the U.S. dollar.

          • An increase in defense deals with the United States.

          • New challenges in maintaining its recent rapprochement with China.

          The most immediate strategic dilemma would fall on Russia. If India, a major customer, stops importing its discounted oil, Moscow would face a critical choice. To stabilize its budget and the ruble, Russia could either become more dependent on China to absorb its oil exports or agree to difficult compromises with the U.S. over Ukraine in exchange for phased sanctions relief.

          This decision would have the power to dramatically shift the global balance, tilting it further in favor of either China or the United States. Should this Indo-U.S. trade deal force Russia's hand, it will indeed be remembered as a historic turning point.

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Why Wall Street is Betting Big on a Stronger Yuan

          Alexander

          Traders' Opinions

          Remarks of Officials

          Economic

          Central Bank

          Forex

          Bank of America has upgraded its forecast for the Chinese yuan, joining a growing consensus among Wall Street firms that Beijing will allow its currency to strengthen further. The move signals rising confidence in the yuan's rally, which has been gaining momentum in recent weeks.

          Other major institutions, including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, have also recently revised their yuan estimates upward as the currency's advance accelerates.

          Major Banks Revise Yuan Targets Upward

          Bank of America now projects the onshore yuan will reach 6.7 per U.S. dollar by the end of the third quarter, a notable revision from its previous forecast of 6.8.

          Claudio Piron, head of Asia rates and currency strategy at BofA Global Research, cited "robust exports and firmer policy signals" as key factors behind the new forecast. "The yuan's strength is spilling into broader emerging-market FX gains," he noted.

          Goldman Sachs also sees continued strength, forecasting the yuan will hit 6.80 in six months and 6.70 in twelve months. The bank credits this outlook to greater tolerance from Chinese policymakers and record capital inflows.

          Key Drivers Behind the Currency's Rally

          The yuan's appreciation isn't happening in a vacuum. Several powerful forces are fueling its recent performance:

          • Sustained Capital Inflows: A significant surge in capital flowing into China since last year has provided a strong foundation for the currency.

          • A Weaker U.S. Dollar: Expectations that the United States may favor a weaker dollar have created a favorable environment for the yuan's rise.

          • Support from Beijing: Recent comments from President Xi Jinping, detailed in state media, expressing an ambition for a "powerful currency" have bolstered investor confidence.

          PBOC Signals Tolerance for Appreciation

          Actions from the People's Bank of China (PBOC) have reinforced the bullish sentiment. On Wednesday, the central bank set its daily reference rate for the yuan at its strongest level since May 2023. This followed a move last month where the PBOC raised the "fixing" by the largest margin in over a year.

          The policy signals have translated directly into market performance. This week, the yuan touched its strongest point in nearly three years in both onshore and overseas trading.

          Managing the Risks of a Rapid Rise

          Despite the widespread bullishness, analysts believe the PBOC will aim for a managed and orderly pace of appreciation. A currency that strengthens too quickly could pose risks to China's formidable export engine and attract speculative "hot-money" inflows.

          According to strategists at TD Securities, the central bank could adjust "structural FX parameters" if the yuan's appreciation becomes too sudden. Potential policy tools include:

          • Removing risk reserves on foreign exchange forward sales.

          • Increasing the reserve requirements on foreign exchange.

          These measures would allow the PBOC to moderate the currency's ascent without derailing its overall trajectory.

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Doing Business In Pakistan 34% More Expensive Than In Regional Peers

          Winkelmann

          Economic

          The cost of doing business in Pakistan is about one-third higher than in regional peers and the gap appears to be discouraging entrepreneurship and quietly pushing more people toward salaried employment instead of pursuing their own startups, recent private research shows.

          Last month, Pakistan Business Forum (PBF), a national organization representing trade and industry, found that operating a business in the country is 34% costlier than in neighboring South Asian countries. Ahmed Jawad, the PBF's chief organizer, shared the findings with Nikkei Asia in an interview on Friday.

          Jawad said the analysis was based on industrial data available as of December 2025 and that a mix of structural factors is driving the costs. "Fuel taxes remain high, with an additional petroleum development levy of about 80 rupees ($0.28) per liter, while interest rates are around 12.5%, nearly double the 6 to 7% seen in the region," he said.

          He added that electricity expenses average about 34 rupees per unit, compared with a regional average of 17 rupees. The sharp depreciation of Pakistan's currency -- which tumbled from 110.7 rupees per dollar in January 2018 to 280 rupees per dollar in December 2025 -- has made imports far more expensive. "In addition, the overall tax burden can reach up to 55%, significantly higher than in regional economies," he told Nikkei Asia, referring to the effective tax rate for companies.

          Bilal Ghani, executive director of research and consultancy firm Gallup Pakistan, said hat input costs have risen largely because of policy choices that restrict competition. "Trade and industrial policies have often protected domestic producers by restricting imports of cheaper foreign inputs," he told Nikkei. "Instead of allowing firms to access globally competitive inputs, businesses are forced to rely on more expensive local alternatives."

          He further added that Pakistan is perceived as a high-risk jurisdiction due to terrorism, money-laundering concerns, and geopolitical tensions. Therefore, its firms face far more licensing, certification and due diligence requirements than companies in most other developing countries. "[Those] requirements raise the fixed cost of doing business, particularly for exporters and technology firms," he said.

          The costly environment appears to be hurting Pakistan's economy, particularly exports, which have struggled to achieve sustained growth since 2021, as Jawad offering as examples the "hundreds of medium-sized businesses in the textile sector" that have shut down in recent years. "The trade agreement between the European Union and India, which is favorable to India, could further disadvantage Pakistan's textile sector," he added.

          That is Pakistan's largest exporting industry, accounting for around 60% of total overseas shipments in fiscal year 2024. In December last year, the PBF wrote a letter to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, asking the government to address the cost of doing business with concrete measures, including regionally competitive electricity tariffs and more competitive corporate tax rates.

          In addition to the PBF's analysis, Gallup Pakistan released one covering household income and expenditure last month. It shows that salaried employees now account for 60.1% of the workforce, up from 53.4% in fiscal 2010-2011, while self-employment has remained low at 21.8%, down from 24.4% in 2010-2011.

          Ali, a business graduate based in Islamabad who asked that his full name not be used, said he tried to start a restaurant after completing his studies but later abandoned the plan in frustration. "I was hounded by so many government departments that I ultimately decided to give up the idea and started looking for a job," he told Nikkei.

          "The cost of doing business is high, which is pushing more people toward salaried jobs, while bureaucratic hurdles, limited access to finance and ongoing political and economic uncertainty continue to constrain small businesses," Niaz Murtaza, an independent economist based in Islamabad, told Nikkei.

          Ghani, from Gallup, points toward an educational dimension in which the number of salaried workers in Pakistan is increasing. "Entrepreneurship, risk-taking and opportunity recognition were never meaningfully integrated into higher education curricula in Pakistan. Instead, students were socialized to become efficient workers for large firms and multinationals," he added.

          Source: Asia_Nikkei

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2026 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Personal Information Protection Statement
          Business

          White Label

          Broker API

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          Connect Broker
          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com