Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



Japan Tankan Small Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)A:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Large Non-Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)A:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Large Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)A:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Small Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)A:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Large Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)A:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Large-Enterprise Capital Expenditure YoY (Q4)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Rightmove House Price Index YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Industrial Output YoY (YTD) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Urban Area Unemployment Rate (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Saudi Arabia CPI YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Industrial Output YoY (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Industrial Output MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Existing Home Sales MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada National Economic Confidence IndexA:--
F: --
P: --
Canada New Housing Starts (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Employment Index (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Index (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core CPI YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Manufacturing Unfilled Orders MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Prices Received Index (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing New Orders Index (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Manufacturing New Orders MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core CPI MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Trimmed CPI YoY (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Manufacturing Inventory MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada CPI YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada CPI MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada CPI YoY (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core CPI MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada CPI MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Federal Reserve Board Governor Milan delivered a speech
U.S. NAHB Housing Market Index (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Australia Composite PMI Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Australia Services PMI Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Australia Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. 3-Month ILO Employment Change (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Unemployment Claimant Count (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Unemployment Rate (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. 3-Month ILO Unemployment Rate (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Average Weekly Earnings (3-Month Average, Including Bonuses) YoY (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Average Weekly Earnings (3-Month Average, Excluding Bonuses) YoY (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
France Services PMI Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
France Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
France Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services PMI Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Composite PMI Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone ZEW Economic Sentiment Index (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Germany ZEW Current Conditions Index (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Germany ZEW Economic Sentiment Index (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Trade Balance (Not SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone ZEW Current Conditions Index (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Trade Balance (SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Retail Sales MoM (Excl. Automobile) (SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --


No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
The pre-2011 Syrian economy, while facing structural challenges, was that of a lower-middle-income country with a functioning industrial base, a significant agricultural sector and nascent potential in tourism and services.
The pre-2011 Syrian economy, while facing structural challenges, was that of a lower-middle-income country with a functioning industrial base, a significant agricultural sector and nascent potential in tourism and services.
That reality was devastated by 14 years of war, violence and sanctions, emerging into a drug-based Captagon economy. Its gross domestic product contracted by more than 50 per cent from its pre-war peak (by 83 per cent if one uses night-time light estimates) between 2010 and 2024.
Half the pre-war population has been forcibly displaced, representing lost generations of economic output and potential. About two-thirds of the current population lives in poverty (earning less than $3.65 per capita a day), and more than half the population faces food insecurity.
The directly visible indicator of the devastation was the collapse of the local currency (from 47 Syrian pounds per US dollar in 2010 to 14,800 by the end of 2024), as growing budget deficits were financed by the monetary printing press and people shifted into foreign currencies to hedge against near-hyperinflation.
The removal of US sanctions and of Syria’s "designation as a state sponsor of terrorism” is strategically important. The decision was followed by the EU passing legislation to lift all sanctions, thereby enabling Syria's reintegration into the international economic and financial community.
The Gulf and other Arab countries are steadily bringing Syria back into the fold, restoring long-disrupted economic and financial relations. Saudi Arabia and Qatar have settled Syria’s arrears to the World Bank, pledged to fund public sector restructuring and rebuild energy infrastructure, signed agreements for major infrastructure and power projects, and the resumption of airline services. Iraq has reopened a main border crossing, and DP World has signed an $800 million deal to develop Tartus Port.
Sanctions removal allowed for Syria's renewed participation in the SWIFT payment system, reactivating formal channels for international trade, remittances and financial flows, delivering a powerful antidote to the scenario of hyperinflation and a dominant illicit sector.
The removal unlocks a multistage recovery process, sequentially addressing the critical deficits in liquidity, capital and strategic infrastructure investment that currently paralyse the country.
However, the success of this pathway will be contingent on the implementation of credible and transparent, domestic, structural and institutional reforms.
Syria needs a comprehensive IMF programme and support from the Arab Monetary Fund and Gulf central banks (possibly through central bank swaps and trade financing lines).
The institutions of the central bank, banking supervision and AML/CFT need to be rebuilt. A new monetary and payment system has to be established.
The banking and financial sector has to be restructured, and banks recapitalised, while allowing for private banks (including foreign) to re-emerge. The Syrian pound should stay floating until macroeconomic stability has been restored, including through fiscal reform and access to international finance for trade.
Importantly, the government and central bank need to rebuild the statistical system for evidence-based policymaking; one cannot govern, reform, regulate and manage what one does not know.
Removal of sanctions will allow transfers and remittances through formal channels from the large Syrian expatriate community, a lifeline for returning families, as well as financing reconstruction of housing and businesses.
Restoring the banking system means less reliance on the use of cash – helping to revive the formal economy as compared to the dominant informal economy, and also combating money laundering and terrorist finance associated with the production and trade of drugs. Remittances and capital inflows would allow the Central Bank of Syria to rebuild its foreign currency reserves, stabilise the forex market and restore monetary stability to control inflation.
The removal of sanctions will also lower the prohibitive risk premium associated with Syria and open the country for the much-needed foreign direct investment to stabilise the economy, and for broader reconstruction funding.
The Damascus Securities Exchange, now operational again, could evolve from a symbolic entity into another channel of financing, allowing the government and Syrian businesses to tap into local and international capital for the first time since 2009.
The country’s substantial, largely unexploited, onshore and offshore oil and gas reserves could become an important source of reconstruction finance and job creation. Strategically and importantly, the removal of sanctions would allow oil and gas pipelines to be reopened, and new ones built; pre-civil war, Syria produced up to 400,000 barrels a day of crude versus between 80,000-100,000 bpd this year.
Reactivating existing wells and oil export infrastructure could become a major source of revenue and foreign exchange, dramatically improving Syria's fiscal position and its ability to reconstruct the devastated country, and bring in international funding.
New pipelines linking oil and gas from the Gulf (notably Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi) and Iraq to the Mediterranean would provide a strategic alternative to maritime routes through the Straits of Hormuz and Red Sea.
Azerbaijan and Syria signed a preliminary agreement on July 12, pledging co-operation in the energy sector – to enable export of gas from Azerbaijan to Syria, through Turkey – and help in rebuilding Syria’s energy infrastructure.
Over the medium and longer term, a new, transformative energy infrastructure and map linking the hydrocarbon-rich regions of the Gulf and Iraq to the Mediterranean coast can be developed: a major building block in stabilising and helping to redevelop Syria.
The lifting of sanctions is a critical initial step supporting Syria in emerging from a vicious cycle of destruction, economic collapse and illicit activity into a virtuous circle of reconstruction, redevelopment, regional and international reintegration.
The realisation of this road map requires a commitment from Syria to undertake essential reforms in governing, the rule of law and institutional transparency. Only then can the country hope to attract and retain the human and financial capital needed to rebuild its economy, regain investor trust, and reclaim its historic role at a vital geostrategic crossroads.
Barely two weeks after the world’s No. 1 economy enacted a fiscal package judged by many economists to leave the US on an unsustainable borrowing path, No. 4 is holding an election with its own budget dangers.
Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party, which once held near monopoly power over national politics, and its current coalition partner are at risk of losing their majority in the upper house of parliament. Polls ahead of Sunday’s ballot have shown the coalition losing steam in the final days.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba already lost majority control of the more powerful lower house last October. A setback in the second chamber would put pressure on the administration to compromise with other parties.
“A loss of majority by the LDP coalition could place additional pressure on fiscal policy, as the opposition parties’ manifestos are largely focused on fiscal expansion,” Japan markets researchers Ikue Saito and Junya Tanase wrote in a note Thursday — expressing a view held by many.
Japan’s biggest bank lobby was so worried about some of the election pledges that it warned this week about the potential of a further downgrade of the nation’s sovereign credit rating.
Opposition party leaders have played down concerns over plans to cut taxes, arguing that their plans are fiscally sustainable. Among their arguments: lower sales taxes will boost spending and growth, supporting budget revenue down the line.
The Trump administration has made much the same argument about the “one big beautiful bill” enacted earlier this month.
Whether financial markets buy the argument remains to be seen. With Germany also tilting toward fiscal expansion, there are increasing demands being made on bond investors the world over.
In Japan, yields lately have been on a tear. Benchmark 10-year government rates hit the highest since 2008 this week, while yields on 30-year bonds hit the highest level since their 1999 debut.
Further moves in Japan raise the risk of ripple effects across the globe. If the government does lose its majority on Sunday, JPMorgan’s Saito and and Tanase said that the outcome would likely be “higher US Treasury yields impacted by the steepening of the Japanese government bond curve.”
While many economies use the standard of two consecutive quarters of negative economic growth to define a technical recession, the US waits for the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research to make the call. That can often come too late to be useful for policymakers, businesses and households, so a cottage industry has grown around building early recession indicators.
In a NBER working paper, economist Pascal Michaillat has outlined an algorithm using unemployment and vacancy data to come up with a new real-time recession detector. The bad news: It puts the odds of the US already being in recession at 71%.
“Overall, the algorithm developed in the paper shows that labor market conditions characteristic of a recession are not on the horizon — they are already here,” Michaillat wrote in the paper.
In Japan, rice isn’t just food — it lies at the heart of the nation’s culture and identity. Even the emperor himself grows rice for sacred rituals.
But ever since it started disappearing from store shelves last year and prices reached new highs, rice has also become a flashpoint for public frustration.
Long lines formed for stockpiles released by the government to ease the shortage. Convenience store Lawson jumped on the trend to sell \ balls using grain from an old harvest. And an agriculture minister was ousted after a joke about never having to buy rice – a gaffe that struck a nerve amid inflation.
The crisis can be traced back to 2023 when a sweltering summer hit harvests just as an influx of tourists put pressure on demand. But long-held government policies effectively capping output and discouraging imports have made it tough to remedy the problem.
Even US President Donald Trump seized on the issue in ongoing tariff talks, accusing the country of being “spoiled” and slamming its rice import policies.
Now, as Japan heads to polls this Sunday, rice is also at the center of a political gambit.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba from the Liberal Democratic Party is attempting to win over inflation-squeezed urban voters. He’s leaning on Agriculture Minister Shinjiro Koizumi, who in just two months slashed prices by bypassing long-standing distribution networks and challenging agricultural cooperatives.
The rice shortage has eased and prices have dropped about 16% since May (though they still remain 50% higher than a year ago). But as that provided some relief to consumers, it has angered farmers, with some openly considering voting against the party that had long protected them.
It wouldn’t be the first time that food and farming has stirred up voter sentiment. In the past few years, a wave of farmer discontent has shaken up politics from Europe to India, while high grocery prices featured prominently in elections including that in the US last year.
And even as the cost of living, pension reform and planned tax cuts are other top issues for Japanese voters, rice has become a symbol of the strain on households. The results of the Sunday election will tell whether the intervention from the ‘rice minister’ was enough to secure the government’s future.
Flipping burgers won’t be cheap during the next few months, argues Bloomberg Opinion’s Javier Blas. Record beef prices may sound counterintuitive when vegetarianism seems to be on the rise, but the problem is supply. The world is running out of calves while ranchers face much higher rearing costs — due to more expensive feed and costs of meeting animal welfare regulations.
EU approves 18th package of sanctions against Russia.Russia has sold most of its oil above G7 price cap of $60.Kremlin says Russia is immune to sanctions.Russia sells oil mostly to China, India and Turkey.
Russian government and trading sources played down the impact of new restrictions on trade in Russian crude that the European Union approved on Friday in a new package of sanctions against Moscow over the conflict in Ukraine.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also said Russia had built up a certain immunity to Western sanctions.
Russia has managed to sell most of its oil above a price cap of $60 a barrel that the Group of Seven Western economies have tried to enforce as the G7 mechanism makes it unclear who must police its implementation.
Since April 1, Urals oil has been mostly trading below $60 anyway as the price of global crude benchmarkshas fallen. The current Urals price in Russian ports is around $58 per barrel, according to Reuters calculations.
The EU sanctions seek to be more effective by setting a moving price cap at 15% below the average market price of Russian oil, EU diplomats said. That means roughly $47.60 per barrel at present.
"We have repeatedly said that we consider such unilateral restrictions illegal; we oppose them," Peskov told a daily conference call with reporters.
"But at the same time, of course, we have already acquired a certain immunity from sanctions; we have adapted to life under sanctions ...
"Furthermore, each new package adds a negative effect for the countries that join it. This is a double-edged sword."
Traders doubt the new EU sanctions will significantly disrupt Russian oil trade, though sellers might face more challenges in booking the vessels and increased transport costs.
"The $60 price cap hasn't worked, do you think $47 will work?" said a Russian government source who asked to remain anonymous.
Analysts have said the absence of the U.S. from the EU's price capping scheme will further erode its effectiveness.
One Russian trader said European sanctions were not critical and only U.S. sanctions were influential.
But he said trade would be more challenging for some Western shippers, including some from Greece, who had been increasingly involved in the Russian oil trade. If some players quit, freight costs might rise, he said.
Another trading source said Russian oil's "toxicity" would not increase due to the sanctions, although the options for any diversification had now shrunk further.
Russia sells 80% of its exports to China and India, while Turkey also takes a significant chunk of Russian oil.
Russia still sells some oil via the Soviet-built Druzhba pipeline to Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic.
Global investors pulled money out of equity funds in the week through July 16 as U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats and an inflation report indicating an increase in U.S. consumer prices, dampened risk sentiment.
Investors withdrew a net $5.3 billion from global equity funds during the week, registering their first weekly net sales since the week to June 25, LSEG Lipper data showed.
A U.S. inflation report on Tuesday showed that consumer prices increased at the sharpest pace in five months in June, suggesting tariffs were starting to have an impact on prices and potentially keeping the Federal Reserve on the sidelines until September.
Investors divested a net $11.75 billion worth of U.S. equity funds following two weekly net purchases in a row. In contrast, they added European and Asian funds worth a net $4.66 billion and $718 million, respectively.
Sectoral funds had a mixed set of data as the healthcare and technology sectors witnessed $1.91 billion and $578 million net outflows, while investors snapped up industrial and financial sector funds totaling a net $1.11 billion and $791 million, respectively.
Global bond funds saw a buying spree extended into a 13th straight week, with approximately $12.85 billion net investments flowing into these funds.
Euro denominated bond funds, short-term bond funds, high yield bond funds and government bond funds were popular as these funds witnessed a robust $3.57 billion, $3.08 billion, $1.98 billion and $1.33 billion, respectively in net inflows.
Money market funds, meanwhile, lost about $21.3 billion in their first weekly net sales in three weeks.
Gold and precious metal commodity funds remained popular for an eighth straight week as these funds saw nearly $741 million worth of weekly net investments.
Emerging market funds came under pressure during the week as equities lost $208 million, while bonds had a net $1.12 billion weekly sales that ended an 11-week-long buying trend, data for a combined 29,644 funds showed.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba that their countries can reach a "good agreement" on tariffs, Ishiba said on Friday after meeting Bessent in Tokyo.
No specific terms were discussed, such as the 25% tariff U.S. President Donald Trump has said he will impose on Japan from August 1, Ishiba said, but he added that Bessent would continue "active talks" with his top tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa.
Akazawa, who also joined the meeting, told reporters that both countries agreed to carry on a "constructive dialogue". Bessent left Ishiba's office without speaking to reporters.
The comments from top Japanese officials came after Bessent made a courtesy visit to Ishiba in Tokyo, before attending a U.S. national day event on Saturday at World Expo 2025 in Osaka.
The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Japan's shaky minority government is poised for another setback in an upper house vote on Sunday, an outcome that could jolt investor confidence in the world's fourth largest economy and complicate tariff talks with the United States.
Japan's Mainichi Shimbun daily reported on Friday evening that Akazawa has started making arrangements to visit the United States next week for further tariff talks with Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
From crypto coins to bibles, overseas development deals to an upcoming line of cellphones, President Donald Trump's family businesses have raked in hundreds of millions of dollars since his election.
That flood of money — from billionaires, foreign governments and cryptocurrency tycoons, often with interests before the federal government — has permitted the president to leverage the power of his office for personal gain unlike any of his predecessors.
The sums collected are far greater than those made by the family during Trump's first term, when patronage of his hotels and other properties was de rigueur to curry favor with the famously transactional commander-in-chief.
Here are some takeaways from The Associated Press' reporting on the Trump family's latest money-making ventures:
Trump made money during his first term by turning his hotels and resort properties into destinations for his MAGA allies — and those who sought to curry favor with him.
This time around, the family's ambitions are grander. One of Trump’s cryptocurrencies is conservatively estimated to have pulled in at least $320 million since January, while another received a $2 billion investment from a foreign government wealth fund. A third has sold at least $550 million in tokens.
His sons have jetted across the Middle East to line up new development deals, while his daughter and son-in-law are working with the Albanian government to build a Mediterranean island resort. Even first lady Melania Trump has inked a $40 million documentary deal with Amazon, whose founder, Jeff Bezos, was a frequent target of Trump during his first presidency and whose companies contract extensively with the federal government.
He’s also touted a line of Trump shoes, a Bible that is made in China, and Trump guitars, one of which is a Gibson Les Paul knockoff, featuring “Make America Great Again” fret inlays, that sells for $1,500.
He’s continued to make money from political spending at his hotels, resorts and golf courses, as he has done for over a decade. Conservative groups and Republican committees have spent at least $25 million at Trump properties since 2015, with most of it coming from Trump’s own political organization, campaign finance disclosures show
Since Richard Nixon resigned in disgrace, presidents have gone to great lengths to avoid the appearance of such conflicts.
Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan kept assets in a “blind trust,” while George H.W. Bush used a “diversified trust,” which blocked him from knowing what was in his portfolio. His son, George W. Bush, used a similar arrangement.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features

FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up