U.S.–Iran Rivalry Persists as Negotiations and Military Options Advance in Parallel

Daily News

Summary:

The U.S. is not seeking a rushed resolution with Iran and continues to keep military options on the table; Iran’s parliament speaker has reportedly withdrawn from the negotiation team...

Key Highlights

1. Trump says the Israel–Lebanon ceasefire will be extended by three weeks

2. The U.S. is preparing new military plans targeting Iran’s defenses in the Strait of Hormuz

3. Trump says the U.S. will not act hastily on Iran but retains military options

4. Trump seeks an exit from the Iran conflict; a new nuclear deal may be weaker than the previous one

5. U.S. aircraft carrier heads to the Middle East; Iran unveils retaliation plans

6. IRGC involvement deepens; Iran’s parliament speaker reportedly exits negotiation team

Details

Trump Says Israel–Lebanon Ceasefire Extended by Three Weeks

On April 23 (local time), U.S. President Donald Trump announced via social media that the temporary ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon will be extended by three weeks. He also stated that the United States has held meetings at the White House with senior representatives from both countries, with positive progress, and expressed expectations of hosting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun in the near future.

U.S. Prepares New Military Plan Targeting Iran’s Hormuz Defenses

According to multiple informed sources, U.S. military officials are developing new operational plans to strike Iranian military assets in the Strait of Hormuz if the current ceasefire collapses.

Sources indicate that among various target options, the new plan focuses on dynamic, real-time strikes against Iran’s operational capabilities in the Strait of Hormuz, the southern Persian Gulf, and surrounding areas of the Gulf of Oman. Targets include Iran’s fast attack craft, mine-laying vessels, and various asymmetric warfare assets—tools that have enabled Iran to exert pressure by threatening key maritime routes.

During the initial month-long air campaign, U.S. strikes targeted Iran’s naval forces but largely avoided areas near the Strait, aiming instead to pave the way for deeper strikes into Iranian territory. The new plan, however, would concentrate more intensive and focused air operations around these strategic waterways.

Trump: No Rush on Iran, but Military Options Remain

Speaking at the White House on April 23, Trump said that while negotiations with Iran are ongoing, the U.S. does not want to act hastily, noting that Iran’s leadership is currently in a state of instability.

Although the conflict has exceeded the previously expected four-to-six-week timeline, Trump said the U.S. had already achieved decisive progress through military means in the first four weeks and is now awaiting the outcome of negotiations. If Iran refuses to reach an agreement, the U.S. will complete its objectives through military action.

He revealed that approximately 75% of Iran-related targets have been struck and suggested that Iran may have redeployed forces during the two-week ceasefire period. He also noted that the blockade has significantly disrupted Iran’s normal commercial activities.

Trump added that the U.S. seeks a durable agreement and believes one could be reached immediately, though negotiations will proceed depending on conditions. He also claimed that the U.S. has full control over the Strait of Hormuz, which will reopen once an agreement is reached or under other circumstances.

Trump Seeks Exit from Iran War; New Nuclear Deal May Be Weaker

Trump has repeatedly stated that the conflict with Iran is aimed at preventing Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. However, sources suggest that any eventual agreement may be weaker than the deal he abandoned during his first term.

As ceasefire talks stall, the Trump administration is reportedly seeking alternative solutions to avoid restarting a conflict that has disrupted markets and drawn criticism from allies.

Sources indicate that with growing urgency to secure a deal, the administration may lack the time or leverage to insist on the kind of detailed verification mechanisms included in the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). As a result, the national security team may accept a deal that appears more ambitious on paper but is less enforceable in practice.

U.S. Carrier Moves Toward Middle East; Iran Prepares Retaliation

On April 23, as tensions escalated in the Strait of Hormuz, the U.S. nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush was deployed toward the Middle East.

While the ceasefire remains in place, the timing of the next round of talks remains unclear. Pakistani diplomats indicated that negotiations have reached an impasse, while Trump warned that Iran is running out of time and authorized U.S. forces to sink any vessels laying mines in the Strait.

Israel’s defense minister stated that preparations to resume hostilities are complete, pending a “green light” from the United States.

Meanwhile, citing a loss of confidence in U.S. negotiating intentions, Iran has developed targeted retaliation plans against potential military actions by the U.S. and its allies.

IRGC Involvement Deepens; Iran’s Parliament Speaker Reportedly Exits Talks

According to Israel’s N12 News, Iran’s parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has withdrawn from the negotiation team following increased involvement by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

Ghalibaf had been responsible for indirect negotiations with the United States and mediation efforts facilitated by Pakistan. However, as IRGC influence grew, his decision-making space became increasingly constrained, leading to his resignation from the negotiation process.

Analysts suggest that his departure may further weaken the prospects for renewed dialogue between Iran and Western countries and add uncertainty to future negotiations.

Separately, Iran’s Nour News Agency reported that air defense systems were activated in parts of Tehran for unspecified reasons.

Today’s Focus

07:30 (UTC+8) Japan March CPI

16:00 (UTC+8) Germany April IFO Business Climate Index

20:30 (UTC+8) Canada February Retail Sales (MoM)

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Risk Disclosure

The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data