• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
ASK
BID
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6939.02
6939.02
6939.02
6964.08
6893.47
-29.99
-0.43%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
48892.46
48892.46
48892.46
49047.68
48459.88
-179.09
-0.36%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23461.81
23461.81
23461.81
23662.25
23351.55
-223.30
-0.94%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
96.980
97.060
96.980
97.140
96.840
-0.010
-0.01%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.18557
1.18566
1.18557
1.18745
1.18393
+0.00066
+ 0.06%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.36813
1.36824
1.36813
1.37053
1.36600
-0.00022
-0.02%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4603.89
4604.23
4603.89
4884.47
4402.03
-290.60
-5.94%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
61.544
61.574
61.544
63.933
61.209
-3.883
-5.93%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

India's Nifty 50 Index Last Up 0.5%

Share

Swedish Manufacturing PMI 56.0 Points In Jan - Silf/Swedbank

Share

Stats Office - Swiss December Retail Sales +2.9% Year-On-Year Versus Revised +1.7% In Previous Month

Share

Iran's Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Baghaei Says Tehran Is Examining Details Of Various Diplomatic Processes, Hopes For Results In Coming Days

Share

Israel Expected To Reopen Gaza's Rafah Border Crossing To Egypt, With Limits

Share

FAA Head Says Concerned Other Countries Aren't Putting Enough Resources Into Certifying USA Aircraft

Share

European Benchmark Gas Contract Falls 10.5% To 35.50 EUR/Mwh - Lseg Data

Share

Statistics Bureau - Kazakhstan's January CPI At 1.0% Month-On-Month

Share

S&P Global: Kazakhstan January Manufacturing PMI At 49.8%

Share

German Dec Retail Sales +1.5 Percent Year-On-Year (Versus Reuters Consensus Forecast For +1.1 Percent)

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Russia Will Not Accept NATO-Member Forces In Ukraine

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Nuclear Arms Control For Past 60 Years Helped Verify Intentions And Build Trust

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: The Territorial Issue In Ukraine Talks Is Most Complicated

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: If New Start Expires It Does Not Necessarily Mean A Catastrophe But It Should Alarm Everyone

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Our Proposal To USA On Extending The Limits Of New Start Remains On The Table

Share

USA Dollar Jumps 1% Against Norwegian Crown To 9.7062

Share

Turkey's Main BIST 100 Index Down 1.7% At Early Trading

Share

India's Nifty 50 Index Last Up 0.4%

Share

Kazakhstan's Central Bank Says It Sold Foreign Currency Worth 350 Billion Tenge In January To Mirror Gold Purchases, Will Sell Foreign Currency Worth 350 Billion In February

Share

Spot Gold Extends Losses, Last Down Over 9% At $4403,29.Oz

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
U.S. Core PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Core PPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada GDP MoM (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada GDP YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI MoM Final (Excl. Food, Energy and Trade) (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI YoY (Excl. Food, Energy & Trade) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Chicago PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Canada Federal Government Budget Balance (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland NBS Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland NBS Non-manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Composite PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Korea Trade Balance Prelim (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Japan Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Korea IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Caixin Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Trade Balance (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Inflation Rate YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Core Inflation YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India HSBC Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Australia Commodity Price YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Russia IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Turkey Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Nationwide House Price Index MoM (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Nationwide House Price Index YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany Actual Retail Sales MoM (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Italy Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Africa Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Brazil IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada National Economic Confidence Index

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Output Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Inventories Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing Employment Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing New Orders Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea CPI YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Monetary Base YoY (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Building Approval Total YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Building Permits MoM (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Building Permits YoY (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Private Building Permits MoM (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Overnight (Borrowing) Key Rate

--

F: --

P: --

RBA Rate Statement
Japan 10-Year Note Auction Yield

--

F: --

P: --

Saudi Arabia IHS Markit Composite PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

RBA Press Conference
Turkey PPI YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Turkey CPI YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Turkey CPI YoY (Excl. Energy, Food, Beverage, Tobacco & Gold) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    Ikeh Sunday
    @Ikeh SundayReally? cos the chart i saw earlier wa sthat of XAUUSD and not XAGUSD
    Ikeh Sunday flag
    SlowBear ⛅
    @SlowBear ⛅am on one month on silver chart. it was gold i show 15m view
    Ikeh Sunday flag
    SlowBear ⛅
    @SlowBear ⛅the one with entry is silver not gold
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    Ikeh Sunday
    @Ikeh Sunday Oh got it now, thanks for that clarification
    Ikeh Sunday flag
    SlowBear ⛅
    @SlowBear ⛅ur well come
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    Ikeh Sunday
    @Ikeh Sunday Cool that is clear now, so you are selling and targeting 70.20 on Silver not bad i will look into it myself
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    Ikeh Sunday
    @Ikeh Sunday Wow, you are one discipline trader bro, you are very loyal to silver
    Ikeh Sunday flag
    SlowBear ⛅
    @SlowBear ⛅am use to it and besides it's the only instrument that moves in volume . we just have to get it right or get wiped
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    Ikeh Sunday
    @Ikeh Sunday I completely understands you bro, experience mixed with sustainability - Silver provides both!
    Kung Fu flag
    Ikeh Sunday
    @Ikeh SundayI'd rather target a sellside when or if silver drops to $70.
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    Ikeh Sunday
    @Ikeh SundayAnd getting it right comes in slow but once mastered that is all you need to buy a mansion in Johanesburg!
    Kung Fu flag
    I'd look for more sellside just below $70, precisely at $69.50. That's a breakout to the downside @Ikeh Sunday
    Kung Fu flag
    @Ikeh Sunday$65 will be, in that case, my very first target.
    JOSHUA flag
    Seems gold is picking up
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    JOSHUA
    Seems gold is picking up
    @JOSHUAIt will pick up, but the pick will be slow and sluggish - so stay on a look out
    favour flag
    JOSHUA
    Seems gold is picking up
    @JOSHUAnot yet
    favour flag
    JOSHUA
    Seems gold is picking up
    @JOSHUAjust respected a FVG
    SlowBear ⛅ flag
    JOSHUA
    Seems gold is picking up
    @JOSHUAif you in fact wants to trade Gold today just look for an entry on 5min timeframe
    Kung Fu flag
    JOSHUA
    Seems gold is picking up
    @JOSHUAmaybe. Maybe that pickup is only a shallow retracement
    Kung Fu flag
    @JOSHUAin what time frame are you viewing it
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          Japanese Yen Plunges Past 155 Against the Dollar

          Samantha Luan

          Remarks of Officials

          Stocks

          Economic

          Central Bank

          Forex

          Daily News

          Political

          Summary:

          Japan's yen plunged past 155, stirred by PM Takaichi's perceived weak-yen stance and a hawkish US Fed nomination.

          The Japanese yen weakened significantly on Monday, sliding past the key 155 level against the U.S. dollar. The move was triggered by comments from Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi that markets interpreted as an endorsement of a weaker currency, compounded by a strengthening greenback.

          Figure 1: The USD/JPY exchange rate chart from October 2025 to January 2026 shows the yen's weakening trend, culminating in its move past the 155 mark.

          Takaichi's Comments Fuel Speculative Selling

          Over the weekend, Prime Minister Takaichi highlighted the advantages of a weaker yen during a campaign speech for a lower house election scheduled for February 8. She argued that a strong yen hurts exporters' competitiveness and that the current currency weakness represents "a big opportunity for export industries."

          Takaichi also noted that Japan's Foreign Exchange Fund Special Account has "coffers that are brimming now," a remark that further fueled market speculation.

          Analysts suggested that these comments, especially when combined with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's recent statement that Washington would "absolutely not" intervene in currency markets, were likely to accelerate speculative yen selling.

          In response to the market reaction, Takaichi attempted to clarify her position on social media, stating that the press had misunderstood her. "My intention was not to say whether yen appreciation or yen depreciation is good or bad, but to note that 'we want to build a strong economy that is resilient to exchange rate fluctuations,'" she explained.

          Despite her clarification, the yen continued its slide. The decline was further supported by a Finance Ministry announcement confirming that Japan had not conducted any foreign exchange interventions in the past few weeks.

          Dollar Strengthens on Hawkish Fed Chair Nomination

          The yen's fall was not just a story of local politics; it was also driven by strong investor demand for the U.S. dollar.

          On Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump announced his intention to nominate Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve chair, succeeding Jerome Powell. This news prompted a dollar recovery after a sharp sell-off last week.

          Michael Wan, a senior currency analyst at MUFG Bank, described Warsh as a hawk. "History would suggest he is a hawk with a predisposition to focus on inflation," Wan wrote in a note. He added that Warsh has historically been critical of the Fed expanding its balance sheet and believes the central bank has overstepped its mandate.

          While Warsh has more recently voiced support for interest rate cuts, his nomination has led the market to anticipate less aggressive monetary easing from the Fed, strengthening the dollar.

          Nikkei's Brief Rally Fades as Tech Stocks Tumble

          The yen's depreciation initially provided a boost to the Japanese stock market. Shares of major exporters like Toyota Motor and Subaru rose as a weaker currency makes their products more competitive abroad.

          The benchmark Nikkei Stock Average reflected this optimism, at one point climbing over 900 points, a gain of 1.7%.

          However, the rally was short-lived. The stock market quickly lost momentum and turned lower as a tumble in major technology stocks erased the early gains.

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          OPEC+ Signals Likely Output Freeze in March as Oil Prices Reach Six Month High

          Gerik

          Economic

          Commodity

          Oil Prices Strengthen Despite Oversupply Expectations

          Global oil markets have entered the new year on firmer footing, with prices reaching their highest levels in six months. At the close of trading on January 31, Brent crude was priced at nearly 70 USD per barrel, approaching the recent high of 71.89 USD per barrel recorded on January 29. This rally has occurred even as many forecasts continue to warn of potential global oversupply in 2026, which would typically exert downward pressure on prices.
          The current price strength reflects a shift in market focus from medium term supply balances toward short term risk factors, particularly those related to geopolitical uncertainty and operational disruptions.

          OPEC+ Poised to Maintain Current Output Policy

          The OPEC+ grouping is widely expected to maintain its existing plan to pause further production increases in March 2026. According to sources familiar with the discussions, the upcoming meeting of eight core OPEC+ members is primarily aimed at reaffirming the current production framework rather than introducing new policy changes for subsequent months.
          This cautious stance follows earlier decisions to halt output hikes during the first quarter of 2026, a period typically characterized by seasonally weaker demand. The relationship between demand seasonality and supply discipline remains central to OPEC+ market management strategy, as premature increases could undermine price stability.

          Middle East Tensions Drive Risk Premium

          Geopolitical developments in the Middle East have emerged as a key driver behind the recent rise in oil prices. International media reports indicate that US President Donald Trump is considering various policy options toward Iran, including the possibility of targeted military action aimed at increasing political pressure.
          While both Washington and Tehran have signaled openness to high level dialogue, Iranian officials have stated that national defense capabilities are not subject to negotiation. At the same time, broad US sanctions continue to restrict Iran’s oil export revenues, reinforcing supply related risk perceptions in energy markets. These dynamics contribute to a correlation between geopolitical escalation risks and short term price movements, even in the absence of actual supply losses.

          Kazakhstan Supply Issues Add Further Support

          Beyond geopolitics, oil prices have also been supported by ongoing supply disruptions in Kazakhstan, where the energy sector has faced repeated operational issues in recent months. These disruptions have tightened available supply at the margin, adding to upward price pressure.
          A partial offset has emerged, however, as Kazakhstan recently announced the gradual restart of operations at the giant Tengiz oil field, beginning in the middle of last week. While this development may ease some immediate concerns, the restart is expected to be phased, limiting its near term impact on global supply balances.

          Recent Production History Shapes Current Strategy

          From April to December 2025, OPEC+ increased production quotas by approximately 2.9 million barrels per day, equivalent to around 3 percent of global demand. This expansion was designed to gradually unwind earlier supply cuts while avoiding market disruption.
          However, as consumption typically softens during the first quarter, the group opted to freeze further increases to stabilize prices. The current deliberations reflect continuity rather than a policy shift, suggesting that OPEC+ remains focused on managing volatility rather than responding aggressively to short term price signals.

          JMMC Monitoring Without Direct Policy Power

          Alongside the main policy meeting, the Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee will also convene to review the latest market data. While the committee does not have authority to set production levels, its assessments and recommendations play an important role in shaping subsequent decisions by the broader alliance.
          Overall, the likely extension of the production freeze underscores OPEC+ preference for caution. With geopolitical risks elevated and supply disruptions unresolved, the group appears inclined to prioritize price stability in the near term, even as longer term questions about demand growth and oversupply remain unresolved.
          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trading In The Week Ahead: Silver Volatility, US Nonfarm Payrolls & Global Market Risks

          Pepperstone

          Commodity

          Forex

          Extreme Volatility and Position Sizing Remain the Core Risk

          Last week will not be forgotten for some time. Those with exposure to ultra-crowded markets will be acutely aware that trading any financial instrument with a 10-day realised volatility of 186%, as seen in silver, demands both an open mind as to where the collective may push price and a disciplined approach to position sizing. Correctly sizing exposure relative to such extreme levels of volatility is absolutely essential. As the new trading week begins and markets attempt to re-establish fair value and some form of balance, the eruptions seen in several more dysfunctional markets may yet prove to be aftershocks. Carrying risk when one cannot immediately react remains the primary consideration.

          Market Flows, Liquidity and Event Risk Drive Price Action

          Markets ultimately respond to flows, while liquidity conditions go a long way in explaining the magnitude of price movements. For risk managers, the event risks ahead must also be carefully assessed. Traders are right to ask whether an upcoming event is likely to generate an outsized move or a volatility shock that could materially impact existing exposures. Given the range of possible outcomes, it is also worth questioning whether there is any clear directional skew that provides a genuine trading edge.

          US Nonfarm Payrolls the Marquee Scheduled Event Risk This Week

          With that framework in mind, it is fitting that the economic calendar is particularly full in the week ahead. The Friday release of US nonfarm payrolls stands out as the marquee risk event. Markets are currently modelling a central estimate of 68,000 net new jobs created in January, with the unemployment rate expected to hold at 4.4%. If realised, this outcome would likely be viewed as supportive for risk assets such as equities, offering enough job creation to limit renewed concerns about the US labour market, but not so strong as to materially reduce expectations for Fed rate cuts in June or July, or the pricing of two 25 basis point cuts by December.

          JOLTS and ISM Surveys Still Capable of Moving Risk

          Elsewhere in the US, and while likely secondary to nonfarm payrolls, JOLTS job openings and the ISM manufacturing and services surveys still have the capacity to move markets if outcomes prove to be meaningful outliers relative to expectations. RBA Meeting Poses Near Term Risk for AUD Traders Outside the US, the RBA meeting on Tuesday presents a near-term risk for AUD exposures. Interest rate swaps price around 15 basis points of tightening for this meeting, implying a 71% probability of a 25 basis point hike. That said, even if the RBA does raise rates, any AUD reaction may fade quickly unless the accompanying statement is interpreted as sufficiently hawkish to lift expectations for further tightening at future meetings.

          ECB and BoE Meetings Likely to Generate Only Short Lived Volatility

          The ECB and BoE meetings are not expected to result in changes to policy rates. While there may be some review of ECB guidance and the potential for brief volatility in EUR and GBP pairs, any market reaction should be contained and short-lived.

          US Earnings Season Accelerates with Major Tech in Focus

          US equity indices will also command attention, with just under 30% of S&P 500 market capitalisation reporting earnings and guidance this week. Alphabet and Amazon are the major heavyweight releases, while trader favourites such as Palantir, AMD, Qualcomm, Iren, Reddit and Barrick are also on the radar.

          European Earnings and Index Consolidation Continue

          It is a similarly busy earnings week in Europe, with around 30% of Euro Stoxx market capitalisation due to report. European equity indices are consolidating after a modest pullback from recent all-time highs. Conviction around a clear directional move in the DAX or Euro Stoxx 50 remains low, and the indices likely require further work to attract meaningful flows in either direction.

          Silver Volatility Highlights Structural Stress in Precious Metals Markets

          Attention also naturally remains on silver, gold and the US dollar. Silver, and XAGUSD in particular, has become a case study in trading within a dysfunctional market, with products that typically move in close alignment becoming fractured and misaligned. XAG is trading with a 10-day realised volatility of 186%, equating to daily realised moves of nearly 12%, which is extraordinary. The CME's shift to percentage-based margining and successive increases in margin requirements have clearly contributed, alongside elevated positioning.

          China Liquidity and SHFE Selling Triggered the Latest Silver Liquidation

          China remains central to the silver narrative and appears to have provided the trigger for Friday's generational moves. Many traders outside China are now familiar with the UBS SDIC silver futures fund (161226), which had become the primary vehicle for Chinese retail investors to gain exposure to silver. When the Shenzhen Stock Exchange halted trading in the fund on Friday, investors were effectively locked in and forced to seek alternative ways to reduce exposure. That exit occurred through SHFE silver futures, with the resulting selling pressure rippling into COMEX futures and triggering a significant liquidation of positions.

          Is Silver Near a Bottom or Are Further Aftershocks Ahead

          Whether silver has reached a durable bottom is difficult to say. Another round of selling cannot be ruled out as Shanghai futures markets reopen, particularly given the residual stress across leveraged positions and market structure.

          Good luck to all.

          Source: Pepperstone

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          SE Asia's US Trade Surplus Soars Despite Trump Tariffs

          Devin

          Traders' Opinions

          Remarks of Officials

          Data Interpretation

          Economic

          Daily News

          China–U.S. Trade War

          Southeast Asia's export-driven economies saw their trade surpluses with the United States climb sharply in 2025, a surprising outcome that defied the Trump administration's efforts to rebalance trade through new tariffs.

          Official data shows that Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam—three of the region's primary manufacturing and export centers—posted significant gains. Their trade surpluses with the U.S. expanded by 45%, 44%, and 28%, respectively, providing a major boost to their overall trade performance.

          A Surge in Exports to the U.S.

          According to Malaysia's Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry, exports to the U.S. "remained resilient," with value expanding by 17.2%. The ministry credited this growth to "robust demand for [electronics and electric] products, machinery, equipment and parts, processed food as well as manufactures of metal."

          The numbers reveal a clear trend across the region:

          • Malaysia: The trade surplus with the U.S. jumped to $23.2 billion in 2025 from $15.9 billion the previous year, according to CEIC Data. This figure is more than ten times larger than it was a decade ago.

          • Vietnam: The country recorded the largest surplus with the U.S. among Southeast Asian nations, reaching a record $133.8 billion in 2025, a 28% year-on-year increase.

          • Thailand: The trade surplus climbed to $51.3 billion in 2025, up from $35.6 billion a year earlier, driven largely by electronics exports.

          Figure 1: Trade surpluses with the U.S. for Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam showed a steep upward trajectory through 2025, with Vietnam leading the expansion.

          Navigating Trump's Tariff Strategy

          The export boom occurred despite President Trump's announcement of "reciprocal" tariffs in April, which were designed to shrink America's trade deficit. Some Southeast Asian countries were initially hit with duties exceeding 40% before the tariffs took effect in August after bilateral negotiations led to reductions.

          Businesses responded by front-loading shipments, accelerating exports to get ahead of the deadlines. Meanwhile, governments continued to negotiate with Washington to soften the blow.

          In October, the U.S. lowered its tariff on most Malaysian goods from 25% to 19%. A list of 1,711 items, mainly in semiconductors, aerospace, and pharmaceuticals, now face zero tariffs. In exchange, Malaysia promised not to impose export bans or quotas on rare earth elements and critical minerals destined for the U.S.

          "ASEAN will seek to secure preferential rates to limit the downside impact," noted DBS Bank senior economist Chua Han Teng in a report. "Notably, Malaysia is actively negotiating with the U.S. to maintain exemptions for its semiconductor exports from fresh tariffs."

          The China Connection: Widening Deficits

          While trade surpluses with the U.S. grew, the three nations' trade deficits with China widened considerably. This suggests an influx of goods from Asia's largest economy, which is also contending with high U.S. tariffs.

          In 2025, Malaysia's trade deficit with China widened by 62% to $38.4 billion. Thailand's deficit grew 50% to $67.8 billion, and Vietnam's expanded by 40% to $115 billion.

          "China exports cheap goods, and now with EV imports, [Malaysia's] trade deficit with China in future could be wider," commented Vaseehar Hassan Abdul Razack, executive vice chairman at KSI Strategic Institute for Asia Pacific.

          Figure 2: While exports to the U.S. boomed, trade deficits with China deepened significantly for all three nations, particularly Vietnam.

          Some analysts believe Chinese companies may be routing goods through neighboring countries like Vietnam before shipping them to the U.S. to bypass American tariffs. Jaideep Singh, an analyst at the Institute of Strategic & International Studies Malaysia, noted that Malaysia's share of domestic exports fell to 77%, its lowest level in at least seven years.

          "This means that while most of Malaysia's exports are still manufactured and processed domestically, re-exports of goods produced elsewhere are rising," he said.

          An Uncertain Outlook for 2026

          Uncertainty over U.S. trade policy is set to continue into 2026. This month, President Trump announced an increase in tariffs on South Korean automobiles from 15% to 25%. He also threatened, but later retracted, a 10% tariff on European nations that opposed his efforts to acquire Greenland.

          Analysts and governments in Southeast Asia warn that export growth could slow this year as the full-year impact of the tariffs takes hold.

          Thailand's Commerce Ministry stated on January 23 that its 2026 export outlook is "expected to moderate, reflecting the clearer impact of U.S. tariff measures."

          The DBS report echoed this sentiment, noting that Malaysia's goods exports are "likely to be negatively impacted by external headwinds from US tariffs." Chua also pointed out that the tariffs "will pose a major challenge to Vietnam's export-oriented manufacturing sector and its economy in 2026."

          Archanun Kohpaiboon, a visiting senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, believes last year's trend is unlikely to continue. "The [U.S.] trade deal with many countries would be in effect," he said. "Hence, these economies tend to import more from the U.S. and the trade surplus would reduce. This would, of course, pose risk to the ASEAN economy in 2026."

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Oil News: Iran Tensions Lift Crude Oil—Can Geopolitics Override Surplus Fears?

          Samantha Luan

          Commodity

          Key Points:

          · WTI futures surge 6.78% to $65.21 on Iran tensions and U.S. inventory draws—sixth consecutive weekly gain for crude oil.
          · Persian Gulf supply risk escalates as Iran announces military drills near Strait of Hormuz—20% of global oil flows threatened.
          · Analysts forecast Brent at $62 and WTI at $58.72 for 2026—global oversupply of 0.75-3.5M bpd threatens current rally momentum.

          WTI Surges on Iran Tensions — But Oversupply Threatens the Rally

          Nearby WTI futures settled at $65.21 last week, up $4.14 or 6.78%—marking the sixth straight weekly gain. Traders are feeding off escalating U.S.-Iran tensions and tighter U.S. inventories, pushing both WTI and Brent to multi-month highs. But analyst consensus is screaming oversupply.

          War Premium Is Real — Persian Gulf Risk Is Pricing In

          The biggest catalyst? Geopolitics. President Trump warned Tehran it faces military action unless it accepts a new nuclear deal. The U.S. deployed additional naval assets to the Persian Gulf, and Iran just announced live-fire military drills in the Strait of Hormuz next week. Roughly 20% of global seaborne oil flows through that chokepoint.

          Traders are pricing in disruption risk even without actual barrel losses. Stack that with drone strikes on Russian tankers in the Black Sea and tightening U.S. sanctions on Russian fuel exports to Asia, and you've got a risk premium that's hard to ignore.

          U.S. Inventories Are Tightening — For Now

          The latest EIA report showed a 2.3-million-barrel draw in commercial crude stocks. At 423.8 million barrels, U.S. inventories are sitting about 3% below the five-year seasonal average. That shift from earlier January builds is giving buyers confidence that near-term demand is absorbing supply.

          But the Oversupply Math Isn't Going Away

          Here's where bulls need to be careful. A recent Reuters poll of 31 economists and analysts forecasts Brent averaging just $62.02 per barrel in 2026, with WTI projected at $58.72—both well below current levels. Global oil markets face a structural surplus ranging from 0.75 to 3.5 million barrels per day this year.

          OPEC+ paused production hikes for Q1 2026 after raising output targets by 2.9 million barrels daily last year. Analysts expect the group will watch consumption patterns closely before making any big moves.

          What Traders Should Watch Next Week

          Geopolitical risk premiums could extend if Iranian tensions escalate or we see actual supply disruptions—potentially pushing prices into the low-to-mid $70s. On the flip side, any clear de-escalation signals or a surprisingly bearish inventory report could trigger profit-taking back toward consensus forecast levels near $60. For now, the war premium is underpinning the rally, but the fundamental backdrop of excess supply capacity says don't get too comfortable chasing this move.

          Weekly Light Crude Oil Futures

          Technically, both the weekly swing chart and the 52-week moving average are signaling an uptrend, but the market is facing headwinds inside a key retracement zone. Traders will also be monitoring a long-term pivot for direction.

          The breakout over the 52-week moving average at $60.64 triggered the huge rally. This is understandable since it had been capping gains since late September. This is the support.

          The next surge was fueled by a recovery of the long-term pivot at $63.62. This indicator will determine the strength of the trend.

          The intermediate range is $75.12 to $54.70. Its retracement zone at $64.91 to $67.31 is potential resistance. Buyers tested this zone last week before stopping at $66.48.

          For longer-term traders, the 52-week moving average has to continue to hold as support. Short-term traders need to see a support base built over the pivot at $63.62. Enough momentum then has to build to trigger a breakout over the top of the retracement zone at $67.32.

          If enough buyers don't show up to overcome the retracement zone then we're likely to become rangebound with the 52-week moving average the floor and the zone the ceiling.

          Source: FX Empire

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Washington Signals Openness to Cuba Talks Amid Escalating Sanctions Pressure

          Gerik

          Economic

          Trump Signals Willingness to Engage Havana

          On January 31, US President Donald Trump announced that the United States has begun negotiations with Cuban leaders, voicing confidence that the two sides could eventually reach an agreement. While the president did not disclose details regarding the scope or timing of the talks, his remarks marked a notable rhetorical opening after years of strained bilateral relations.
          The statement suggests a tentative diplomatic overture, though its practical substance remains unclear. By withholding specifics, the administration appears to be testing political reactions while retaining flexibility over the direction and pace of engagement.

          Negotiations Overshadowed by New Economic Measures

          Trump’s comments came just two days after he signed an executive order imposing higher tariffs on countries that supply oil to Cuba. This move effectively tightened economic pressure on the Caribbean nation and reinforced Washington’s leverage at the outset of any potential dialogue.
          The sequencing of these actions points to a strategic pattern rather than coincidence. The initiation of talks coinciding with punitive economic measures indicates a bargaining posture in which sanctions function as leverage rather than as instruments of isolation alone.

          Cuba Condemns What It Calls Aggressive Policy

          Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez sharply criticized the new US executive order, characterizing it as an aggressive act against both the Cuban government and its population. He emphasized that the measures come on top of nearly 65 years of US economic sanctions, which Havana describes as the longest and most severe embargo imposed on any country.
          From the Cuban perspective, the renewed pressure reinforces a historical narrative of economic coercion rather than constructive diplomacy. This framing complicates prospects for trust building, even if negotiations formally proceed.

          Energy Dependence and the Venezuela Factor

          Since the imposition of US sanctions in 1962, Cuba has relied heavily on imported oil, primarily from Venezuela. However, recent US military action against Venezuela earlier this year, coupled with the arrest and transfer of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his spouse to the United States for trial, has significantly disrupted Caracas’s operations.
          President Trump has previously stated that oil shipments from Venezuela to Cuba would be suspended until a separate agreement is reached. The combination of sanctions enforcement and regional instability has therefore altered Cuba’s energy supply dynamics, leaving the island increasingly exposed.

          Fuel Shortages and Domestic Impact in Cuba

          The tightening of sanctions and the blockage of oil flows have intensified Cuba’s fuel shortages, with visible consequences for its national electricity system. Power generation has been severely affected, leading to frequent outages and compounding economic and social pressures on the population.
          In this context, Washington’s optimism about a potential deal contrasts sharply with the immediate humanitarian and infrastructural challenges facing Cuba. The relationship between sanctions and negotiations is therefore not merely rhetorical but materially linked, as energy constraints heighten Havana’s vulnerability.

          A Narrow Diplomatic Window

          Taken together, the developments suggest that while the United States is signaling openness to dialogue, negotiations are unfolding under asymmetric conditions shaped by economic pressure. Whether this approach leads to compromise or entrenches confrontation will depend on how both sides interpret the balance between coercion and engagement.
          For now, Trump’s optimism points to a possible diplomatic opening, but the broader trajectory of US–Cuba relations remains uncertain, constrained by longstanding mistrust, regional instability, and the immediate realities of Cuba’s deepening energy crisis.
          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          A Fragile Outlook for Russia’s Push to Revive the RIC Mechanism

          Gerik

          Economic

          Political

          Russia’s Strategic Rationale Behind Reviving RIC

          According to the South China Morning Post, Russia has renewed its call to reactivate the trilateral Russia–India–China mechanism, commonly known as RIC. In early January 2026, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov emphasized Moscow’s close bilateral ties with both New Delhi and Beijing, framing RIC as a historical pillar of emerging multipolarity and an intellectual precursor to BRICS.
          The idea of RIC was originally proposed in 1998 by former Russian prime minister Yevgeny Primakov as a framework to balance Western dominance and encourage Eurasian coordination. Despite its longevity as a concept, the mechanism has never evolved into a substantive platform, largely because of deep seated geopolitical divergences, most notably between India and China.
          At a Russian diplomatic briefing on January 20, Lavrov reiterated that a multipolar world order is inevitable, describing Russia–India relations as uniquely strategic and Russia–China ties as unprecedented in depth and policy alignment. From Moscow’s perspective, reviving RIC would help preserve diplomatic flexibility and reduce isolation under ongoing sanctions pressure.

          India’s Reluctance Rooted in Structural Mistrust

          Analysts widely agree that India assigns RIC only marginal importance. Persistent mistrust between India and China remains the central obstacle. Since the deadly 2020 clashes in the Galwan Valley, tensions along the Line of Actual Control have not been fully resolved. Although limited disengagement has taken place, friction continues in areas such as Depsang Plains and Demchok, while ongoing troop deployments and infrastructure expansion continue to erode strategic confidence.
          This unresolved security environment shapes India’s assessment of trilateral cooperation. Without a minimum threshold of trust, any attempt to expand RIC beyond symbolic dialogue encounters structural limits. As a result, New Delhi views the mechanism as a diplomatic channel rather than a framework capable of producing binding outcomes.

          The Pakistan Factor and Compounding Security Concerns

          The outlook for RIC has further dimmed following reports regarding China’s alleged role during India’s Sindoor military operation, which New Delhi framed as a response to attacks linked to Pakistan backed militant groups. According to Indian and US sources, Beijing reportedly supplied advanced weapons, intelligence support, and information operations to Pakistan, actions that India perceives as directly undermining its security posture.
          Whether interpreted as causation or correlation, these developments reinforce Indian skepticism toward Beijing’s strategic intentions. The closer China–Pakistan alignment becomes in security matters, the narrower India’s political space to engage in a trilateral structure that includes China.

          Avoiding the Perception of a Western Counterweight

          From a strategic positioning perspective, India continues to pursue a pragmatic, non committal approach to RIC. Analysts at the Takshashila Institution argue that New Delhi does not wish to be seen as part of an arrangement implicitly positioned against the United States and its allies, even while rhetorically supporting multipolarity.
          This reflects India’s long standing emphasis on strategic autonomy. Rather than anchoring itself within a fixed bloc, New Delhi seeks flexibility across partnerships, especially as its economic, technological, and defense cooperation with Western countries deepens.

          Economic Corridors and Overlapping Strategic Interests

          Divergent economic priorities also constrain RIC’s development. Facing potential US sanctions risks, India may scale back its role at Iran’s Chabahar Port while prioritizing the International North-South Transport Corridor with Russia. However, this corridor overlaps geographically and logistically with China’s Belt and Road Initiative, particularly in Russia and Central Asia.
          These intersections create both coordination opportunities and latent competition. While technical cooperation is possible, conflicting interests over routes, standards, and influence limit the scope for deeper alignment under a trilateral framework.

          Energy Trade, Sanctions Pressure, and US Leverage

          India’s continued imports of discounted Russian oil remain another sensitive issue. The United States has criticized these purchases, arguing they indirectly fund Russia’s war in Ukraine, and has imposed 50 percent tariffs on certain Indian goods. New Delhi counters that affordable energy imports are essential for economic stability and growth.
          This situation illustrates a clear strategic trade off. Reducing Russian oil imports could ease US trade pressure but risk higher energy costs, while maintaining them sustains diplomatic friction. Some analysts suggest that if India curtails oil purchases to secure concessions from Washington, Russia–China ties may tighten further, leaving Moscow with stronger incentives to promote RIC as a sanctions mitigation tool.

          Payment Systems and Divergent Monetary Agendas

          Another frequently cited area of potential cooperation involves linking financial messaging and payment systems among Russia, China, and India. Yet analysts caution that India does not actively support de dollarization, whereas China is pushing for greater internationalization of the renminbi. These differing monetary objectives limit the strategic depth of any financial integration under RIC, confining cooperation to narrowly defined transactional use rather than systemic transformation.
          India is also closely monitoring the stance of US President Donald Trump before making any strategic commitments related to RIC. According to research from the University of Oxford, any visible expansion of Russia–India cooperation could trigger renewed pressure from Washington.
          At the same time, India has strengthened ties with the European Union, including finalizing a bilateral trade agreement that European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described as the “mother of all deals.” This deepening engagement with Europe further constrains India’s willingness to elevate RIC into a central foreign policy pillar.
          Taken together, India’s cautious stance reflects a consistent priority to safeguard core interests while preserving strategic autonomy. RIC may continue to exist as a dialogue channel useful for signaling and managing perceptions, but the absence of trust between India and China, combined with competing geopolitical and economic incentives, makes it unlikely to evolve into a substantive strategic framework. In an era of intensifying great power rivalry, RIC’s revival appears more symbolic than transformative.
          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2026 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Personal Information Protection Statement
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          Connect Broker
          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com