Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



U.K. Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Services PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Composite PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Economic Activity Index YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Russia Trade Balance (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Expectations Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Coincident Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Lagging Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Business Expectations Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany IFO Business Climate Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Current Business Situation Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Brazil Current Account (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Unemployment Rate (Not SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada National Economic Confidence Index--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl.Transport) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Chicago Fed National Activity Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed New Orders Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed General Business Activity Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BRC Shop Price Index YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Industrial Profit YoY (YTD) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Trade Balance (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index YoY (Not SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Composite Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Present Situation Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Expectations Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Shipments Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Services Revenue Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Australia RBA Trimmed Mean CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI QoQ (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
















































No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data

Data Interpretation

Bond

Political

Forex

Remarks of Officials

Economic

Central Bank

Technical Analysis

Traders' Opinions

Stocks

Daily News
Snap election prospects and fiscal spending plans are fueling a "Takaichi trade," sinking Japan's yen and challenging BoJ policy.
The Bank of Japan (BoJ) started 2025 with a hawkish stance, raising interest rates to their highest level in three decades and signaling more hikes could follow. However, this failed to lift the Japanese yen, as traders sought more specific timing for the next policy move.
The yen's situation worsened dramatically after Kyodo News reported that Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is considering a snap election in February. The news sent the currency into a steep decline, reaching lows not seen since July 2024.
With a 70% approval rating, Takaichi may be positioning for a decisive victory to push through her spending plans, which would further increase Japan's already large government debt. This prospect has triggered what analysts are calling the "Takaichi trade": a falling yen accompanied by soaring stock prices and Japanese Government Bond (JGB) yields. This trend could intensify if the ruling Liberal Democratic Party appears likely to secure a single-party majority.

Compounding the pressure on the yen is the market expectation that the BoJ will be reluctant to tighten monetary policy ahead of an election. This suggests the next interest rate hike may not come until after the spring wage negotiations, and only if they result in substantial salary increases.
As the USD/JPY exchange rate pushes back toward the psychological 160.00 level, talk of government intervention is resurfacing. Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama expressed concern over the "one-way weakening of the yen" during a meeting with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who shared her concerns and called for the BoJ to raise interest rates.
This follows Katayama's warning in December, when USD/JPY crossed 157.00, that Japan has a "free hand" to act. Her recent meeting with Bessent may have been to secure tacit approval from the U.S., making direct intervention near the 160.00 zone a more credible threat.
Despite these warnings, the yen has continued its slide, raising questions about the potential effectiveness of intervention. In 2024, Japanese authorities intervened four times to support the currency.
• April 2024: Two interventions provided only temporary relief before the yen resumed its decline.
• July 2024: Two more interventions had a more lasting impact, driving USD/JPY from around 162.00 to below 140.00 by September. This success was attributed to the intervention being followed by a BoJ rate hike.

Given Takaichi's agenda of increased spending, any currency intervention on its own may have a limited and short-lived effect. A lasting reversal for the yen likely requires a supporting rate hike from the BoJ, especially since a weaker currency could fuel inflation through higher export costs and ultimately harm economic growth.
However, financial markets are not convinced a rate hike is imminent. According to Japan's Overnight Index Swaps (OIS) market, a 25-basis-point hike is not fully priced in until September. If the BoJ holds off on tightening policy, intervention alone may not be enough to stop the yen's decline.

Without a policy shift, yields on Japanese debt will likely continue to rise as fewer investors are willing to finance the nation's growing debt. While Japanese equities have rallied on the prospect of fiscal stimulus, this may not last. Eventually, concerns about inflation and an economic slowdown could lead investors to sell off Japanese assets in a "Sell Japan" event.
Ultimately, unless the Ministry of Finance intervenes and the Bank of Japan follows with a rate hike, the yen is likely to extend its downtrend, with USD/JPY potentially trading above 160.00 soon.
From a technical perspective, the USD/JPY pair is currently challenging the 158.90 resistance level, which marks the peak from January 10, 2025. A decisive close above this level could open the door to a test of the 160.00 mark.
The broader uptrend, defined by the trendline drawn from the September 17 low, remains firmly in place. If the pair breaks above 160.00, the next major target would be the July 3, 2024 high of around 162.00. For the bullish trend to be questioned, bears would need to force a decisive break below the 154.55 support zone.

Top figures from global central banks and Wall Street have rallied in support of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell after the Trump administration threatened him with a criminal indictment. Powell characterized the move as a form of intimidation, sparking a defense from financial leaders who underscored the critical importance of the Fed's independence.
The wave of support highlights the relationships Powell has cultivated and the central bank's vital role in global financial markets. It follows pushback from Republican lawmakers, including members of the Senate Banking Committee, who could block the nomination of a successor to Powell when his term ends in May.

The controversy escalated after Powell revealed on Sunday that the U.S. Justice Department had issued subpoenas concerning his testimony to Congress about the $2.5 billion renovation of the Federal Reserve's Washington headquarters. Powell stated that the investigation was a pretext designed to pressure the central bank into cutting interest rates, a long-standing demand from President Trump.

In a rare joint statement, the heads of 11 of the world's most influential central banks expressed their backing for the Fed chief. "We stand in full solidarity with the Federal Reserve System and its Chair Jerome H. Powell," the statement declared.
Signatories included leaders from the European Central Bank, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Canada, along with the central banks of Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Australia, South Korea, Brazil, and France. Officials from the Bank for International Settlements also signed on.
The group affirmed that Powell has acted with integrity and emphasized that central bank independence is a cornerstone of economic stability. "The independence of central banks is a cornerstone of price, financial and economic stability in the interest of the citizens that we serve," they wrote.

Leading Wall Street executives also voiced their concerns, warning that political pressure on the Fed could backfire.
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon told reporters the probe "is probably not a great idea," predicting it could have "the reverse consequences of raising inflation expectations and probably increase rates over time."
BNY CEO Robin Vince echoed this sentiment. "Independent central banks with the ability to independently set monetary policy in the long-term interests of the nation is a pretty well-established thing," he said. Vince cautioned against actions that could shake confidence in the Fed's independence, which might ultimately push interest rates higher.
Independence from government has long been a foundational principle of modern central banking. However, President Trump has repeatedly broken with this tradition, publicly demanding lower interest rates and pressuring policymakers.
On Tuesday, Trump once again called on Powell to lower interest rates "meaningfully," following a government report that showed consumer prices rose 2.7% in December from the previous year.
Central bankers and analysts fear that political influence over the Fed could erode trust in its commitment to its inflation target, potentially leading to higher inflation and volatility in global financial markets. There are also concerns that a politicized Fed might be reluctant to provide the crucial dollar backstop that helps calm international markets during periods of stress. Such a scenario would likely rattle U.S. markets and export instability worldwide, making it harder for other central banks to maintain price stability.
Despite the political drama, traders are still largely betting that persistent inflation will keep the Fed on hold until at least June.
As tax season approaches, many filers could see larger refunds this year due to significant 2025 tax changes. This potential windfall isn't just good news for individual households; experts say it could have a noticeable impact on the broader economy.
The IRS will begin processing individual returns on January 26. The expected increase in refunds stems from President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill," which introduced several tax-cutting provisions for 2025. Because the IRS did not update tax withholding tables to reflect these changes, many workers' paychecks remained the same throughout the year. The result is that the benefits of the tax cuts will largely be realized when filing returns in 2026.
President Trump projected that 2026 would be the "largest tax refund season of all time," and many tax experts and analysts agree that bigger refunds are likely. However, the final amount owed or refunded will depend on an individual's specific financial situation and how much tax they paid during the year.

The legislation signed by Trump reduced individual income taxes by an estimated $144 billion in 2025, according to the Tax Foundation. Several key provisions are behind this change:
• A larger standard deduction
• A more generous maximum child tax credit
• A higher limit for the state and local tax (SALT) deduction
• A new $6,000 tax break for seniors
• New deductions for auto loan interest, tip income, and overtime pay
Heather Berger, a U.S. economist at Morgan Stanley, stated on a January 2 podcast that these changes are expected to "increase refunds by 15% to 20% on average." For context, the average refund for individual filers was $3,052 as of October 17, 2025, with the IRS issuing about 102 million refunds by that date.
Experts are closely watching to see what Americans will do with this extra cash, as it could temporarily boost consumer spending.
"Our expectation is it would be a positive for consumption," National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told CNBC on January 9.
However, spending behavior often depends on income levels. A note from Piper Sandler on October 31 indicated that households earning between $30,000 and $60,000 typically spend about 30% of their refunds on discretionary purchases. In contrast, households earning $100,000 or more spend only about 15%.
Furthermore, a National Retail Federation survey of roughly 8,600 adults in 2025 found that 82% of taxpayers expecting a refund planned to use the money for paying off debt or for savings. Morgan Stanley's Heather Berger also noted that other economic factors, such as inflation from tariffs or higher health insurance premiums under the Affordable Care Act, could influence spending habits.
While increased spending can stimulate the economy, some analysts worry that a surge in consumer demand could also create inflationary pressure.
Jonathan Parker, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who has researched consumer spending during stimulus cycles, said bigger refunds "could easily be inflationary." He told CNBC that the stimulus checks issued during the Covid-19 pandemic were "certainly correlated" with higher inflation and were a "contributing factor" to the subsequent price boom. The consumer price index peaked at a 9.1% year-over-year increase in June 2022, the fastest rate since 1981.
Former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen acknowledged in January 2025 that stimulus spending may have contributed "a little bit" to inflation but also pointed to "huge supply chain problems" as a major cause.
When asked about the potential inflationary effects of larger refunds in 2026, Kevin Hassett expressed little concern. "We're not really worried about the inflationary effects of that because we [have] got so much supply coming online again," he said.

Nasdaq - daily
Nasdaq - 4 hour
Nasdaq - 1 hourThe latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report has reinforced market expectations that the Federal Reserve will hold interest rates steady at its upcoming meeting, with new data showing inflation remains persistent.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the CPI for all urban consumers rose 0.3% in December on a seasonally adjusted basis. Over the last 12 months, the index increased by 2.7% before seasonal adjustment.
A breakdown of the December numbers reveals that key living expenses were the primary drivers of the increase. The cost of shelter continued its upward trend, rising 0.4% and contributing significantly to the overall monthly figure.
Food prices also climbed, marking a 0.7% increase that covered both groceries and restaurant meals. Energy costs added to the pressure with a 0.3% rise.
The market reaction to the report was mixed. While major stock indexes saw modest pullbacks on Tuesday morning, other assets rallied. Bitcoin climbed approximately 1.8%, gold gained 0.51%, and silver surged 3.99% during the session.
With this inflation data in hand, markets are not anticipating a rate cut when the U.S. central bank meets on January 28.
Ellen Zentner, chief economic strategist at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, noted that the current situation is familiar. "Inflation isn't reheating, but it remains above target," she explained. Zentner added that limited pass-through from tariffs and ongoing housing affordability issues mean the latest report "doesn't give the Fed what it needs to cut interest rates later this month."
This sentiment is strongly reflected in market pricing and probability tools.

The consensus that the Fed will stand pat is widespread. CME's Fedwatch tool indicates a 97.2% probability that interest rates will remain unchanged, leaving only a slim 2.8% chance for a quarter-point reduction.
This view is echoed in betting markets. On platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, participants have priced the odds of the Fed holding rates steady at 96%.
Even external pressures, such as a Department of Justice probe into the Fed's renovation costs, appear to have little impact on policy expectations. The probability of Chair Jerome Powell facing federal charges by June 30, 2026, is currently estimated at just 12%.
Ultimately, the economic data, market pricing, and expert analysis all point to the same conclusion: the Federal Reserve is firmly in a wait-and-see mode. With inflation still present, markets are content to wait for a clearer signal before pricing in any policy changes.

Data Interpretation

Political

Remarks of Officials

Economic

Central Bank

Traders' Opinions

China–U.S. Trade War
The battle against inflation hit a snag in December, as rising costs for groceries, dining out, and clothing kept price pressures elevated for American consumers.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI), a critical measure of inflation, rose 2.7% in December from the previous year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This figure was unchanged from the prior month and matched economists' estimates, suggesting that progress on cooling the economy has stalled.
"The bottom line is, I think inflation is still uncomfortably high," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's. "Inflation for staples, necessities, remains elevated."

A key driver keeping inflation above the Federal Reserve's long-term target of roughly 2% is the tariffs implemented by President Donald Trump. As taxes on imported goods, tariffs are paid by U.S. importers, who are expected to pass at least some of the cost on to consumers.
According to Zandi, these tariffs have added over half a percentage point to the inflation rate. "I think were it not for the tariffs, we would have been back to target already," he noted.
However, the impact on consumers has been less severe than initially feared. Many businesses have absorbed the extra costs into their profit margins to avoid alienating customers with higher prices. Companies that had already imported inventory before the tariffs took effect were also able to maintain typical pricing.
A pending Supreme Court ruling could potentially dismantle the legal framework the Trump administration has used to impose these widespread tariffs. Even without a court intervention, economists widely believe inflation has already peaked and will begin to decline in the latter half of 2026.
"Short of any new tariffs coming online, we think the direction of inflation is lower," said Tom Porcelli, chief economist at Wells Fargo.
The headline inflation rate may be higher than official figures suggest. The record-long government shutdown, which lasted from October 1 to November 12, prevented federal statisticians from collecting complete data. For the month of October, the BLS assumed no price increases occurred for most goods and services.
Zandi estimates that if the missing data were included, the annual CPI inflation rate would be closer to 3%.
Despite these complexities, underlying disinflationary trends appear positive. This is likely a welcome development for Federal Reserve policymakers, who are considering whether to ease interest rate policy later in 2026.
"We expect officials are happy to remain on extended pause, as they wait and see the impact of their recent string of rate cuts," wrote Michael Pearce, chief US economist at Oxford Economics. "With inflation fears fading, officials will feel freer to respond to downside risks to the labor market, should conditions deteriorate."
Affordability has become a central issue for consumers and politicians alike, with prices for household staples climbing in December.
Key monthly increases from November to December included:
• Food Prices: Both groceries and restaurant meals rose by 0.7%. For inflation to return to the Fed's target, monthly increases generally need to be around 0.2%.
• Clothing: Prices increased by about 0.6%.
• Utility Gas: Piped gas service costs jumped 4.4%.
Over the past year, certain items have seen particularly high inflation due to supply constraints, with coffee prices up about 20% and beef up 16%. Utility gas is up 11% for the year, while electricity has risen about 7%.
However, some of these figures may be skewed by data distortions from the government shutdown. Gargi Pal Chaudhuri, chief investment and portfolio strategist at BlackRock, suggested that holiday discounts were over-represented in the November CPI report. "Those deeper-than-normal discounts pulled prices down in November, setting up an artificial jump when prices normalized later in December," she explained.
Looking ahead, a potential counterweight could come from the housing market. Zandi pointed out that weak rent growth is likely to help pull down overall inflation in 2026 and into 2027.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features
Log In
Sign Up