Markets
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests


Philippine Foreign Minister: Discussed Strengthening Intra-ASEAN Trade, Synergy Between Economic And Foreign Ministers

U.S. Weekly Initial Jobless Claims (SA)A:--
F: --
Canada Trade Balance (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
Canada Building Permits MoM (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
U.S. Weekly Continued Jobless Claims (SA)A:--
F: --
U.S. Initial Jobless Claims 4-Week Avg. (SA)A:--
F: --
Canada Wholesale Sales MoM (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
U.S. New Housing Starts Annualized MoM (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
U.S. Building Permits MoM (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Natural Gas Stocks ChangeA:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland M2 Money Supply YoY (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland M1 Money Supply YoY (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland M0 Money Supply YoY (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. 30-Year Bond Auction Avg. YieldA:--
F: --
P: --
Argentina CPI MoM (Feb)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Treasuries Held by Foreign Central BanksA:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. GDP YoY (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance EU (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services Index MoMA:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Monthly GDP 3M/3M Change (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Industrial Output MoM (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing Output MoM (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing Output YoY (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. GDP MoM (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Construction Output YoY (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Construction Output MoM (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Industrial Output YoY (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance Non-EU (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France HICP Final MoM (Feb)A:--
F: --
P: --
Italy Industrial Output YoY (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Industrial Output YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Industrial Output MoM (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Current Account (Not SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
India Deposit Gowth YoY--
F: --
P: --
Brazil Services Growth YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Industrial Output YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl.Transport) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Employment (SA) (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Real Personal Consumption Expenditures MoM (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Annual Real GDP (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Part-Time Employment (SA) (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Full-time Employment (SA) (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Outlays MoM (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index MoM (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index YoY (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index MoM (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Income MoM (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Real Personal Consumption Expenditures Revised QoQ (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Unemployment Rate (SA) (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Labor Force Participation Rate (SA) (Feb)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Manufacturing New Orders MoM (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Manufacturing Unfilled Orders MoM (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Manufacturing Inventory MoM (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Russia Trade Balance (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --



















































No matching data
Volvo Car AB is looking for partnerships for its new central software stack that'll run on all of its future electric models, a sign the carmaker has overcome earlier coding glitches that delayed vehicle launches and sparked recalls.
Volvo Car AB is looking for partnerships for its new central software stack that'll run on all of its future electric models, a sign the carmaker has overcome earlier coding glitches that delayed vehicle launches and sparked recalls.
The manufacturer is open for pacts including licensing of the "superset" system that operates via a handful of high-performance computers, according to Volvo's Chief Engineering & Technology Officer Anders Bell. While a number of carmakers including Volkswagen AG have struggled to move to their own centralized software, those that have managed in-house can potentially tap new revenue streams.
"I am very open to collaborations in this area. The phones are on and the mailboxes are active," Bell said in an interview.
Carmakers, with a history of deep rivalries and spotty success on partnerships, have started to cooperate more on costly new technologies. This follows misses on developing in-house software systems, prompting model delays at the likes of VW and Stellantis NV.
VW last year turned to Rivian Automotive Inc. for a $5.8 billion technology tie-up for Western markets, after mounting setbacks in its Cariad software unit. It set up a similar venture for China with Xpeng Inc. Others, like Ford Motor Co., have scaled back projects that targeted architectures with centralized software functions.
While Volvo, based in Sweden and owned by China's Geely, is shopping its new code, geopolitics means pacts will be limited to partners outside of China, said Bell, who rejoined Volvo in 2022 after six years at Tesla Inc. In the US, regulators are also examining how Volvo's Chinese ownership intersects with data and cybersecurity rules.
Volvo suffered its own pitfalls in the shift from hardware maker into software with bruising delays of the EX90, the brand's flagship SUV: integrating a fully centralized software brain proved far more complex than anticipated, and customers reported a litany of errors. Bell said he's confident that Volvo's next EV, the mid-size EX60 to debut in January, won't have the EX90's problems.
"It has been an extremely big journey to become a software company, and unfortunately we had a spillover effect on customers in the early days of the EX90," Bell said.
The executive compared Volvo's transition to how Apple has built iOS or macOS, and how a central system is configured for successive iPhone or MacBook generations. "Which means: the bugs we solved once for the EX90 are already solved for the EX60."
Bell said he expected the broader industry to mirror moves by VW and Rivian, which are developing an EV and software platform they may sell to other carmakers in the future.
"It's a very interesting example of collaboration that may be unconventional, but it's completely in line with where I believe the development will go," Bell said about the initiative. "You can see carmakers that made big software bets, then went back and adjusted or found a collaboration."
Volvo is also open to sharing its new EV underpinnings, the SPA3 platform.
We're "completely open for business when it comes to collaboration," he said, citing the example of Ford licensing VW's EV platform for Europe. "You can absolutely create a unique customer experience on a technology platform that has been developed more generically."
Volvo's first vehicle made on the new architecture is the EX60, billed as the manufacturer's most important launch in decades. Sister brand Polestar will also produce cars on the platform and other brands owned by Volvo parent Zhejiang Geely Holding Group "may follow," Bell said.
While Volvo has resolved internal issues on software, it still needs to clear broader geopolitical hurdles that in a worst-case scenario could upset sales in the US.
The manufacturer is talking with the Commerce Department a proposed US ban on sales of vehicles that include software developed by Chinese-backed companies. The rules are set to take effect for the 2027 model year, and in a worst-case scenario could mean several Chinese-owned carmakers — including Geely-owned brands such as Polestar and Lotus — could face a sales ban.
Volvo Chief Executive Officer Hakan Samuelsson has repeatedly said he expects the issue to be resolved, though the US government shutdown that ended last month likely delayed the process, according to Bell.
"There is a distinct line between East and West that we have to relate to," Bell said. "Technically, we could open up our entire stack to the whole world. But legally, we cannot."
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features
Log In
Sign Up