US Futures and World Shares Slip as Worries Over Trump’s Fed Chief Pick and AI Weigh on Markets

Source: cnbc

Analysts at Raymond James are cautioning that President Donald Trump's potential military options against Iran lack the possibility of a "quick win," elevating the risk of a prolonged and complex conflict.

In a recent note, analysts including Ellen Ehrnrooth and Ed Mills stated that a U.S. strike on Iran is "more likely than not" unless a diplomatic breakthrough occurs soon. This assessment comes as officials from Turkey, Egypt, and Qatar attempt to mediate a meeting between Washington and Tehran.

The diplomatic push follows Trump's threat to attack Iran if it refuses to negotiate a deal on its nuclear weapons program. The president, who has already sent what he termed an "armada" to the region, has also demanded Iran halt its nuclear activities and its crackdown on anti-government protestors.

White House Weighs Military Scenarios

According to the Raymond James analysis, the White House is contemplating several escalatory actions. These potential operations include:

• Targeted strikes on Iranian security forces or senior officials.

• Commando missions or further strikes to degrade nuclear infrastructure.

• Attacks on Iran's ballistic missile programs or related facilities.

These aggressive postures are consistent with Trump's approach since returning to office in January 2025.

A Departure From Past Operations

President Trump has demonstrated a willingness to use military force in specific situations. Last year, the U.S. executed airstrikes against Iran's nuclear infrastructure. In a separate operation in early January, American forces captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. While both events increased geopolitical tensions, neither resulted in sustained fighting.

However, the Raymond James analysts argue that the current options for Iran are fundamentally different. "The operations for Iran now being considered do not present a 'quick win' like those the administration was able to obtain" previously, they wrote, highlighting the increased "complexity and risk of entering into prolonged conflict."

Oil Markets React to Mixed Signals

Despite the escalating military rhetoric, Trump has also suggested that progress is being made on the diplomatic front. He recently stated that Iran was "seriously talking" with Washington and that arrangements for negotiations were in progress.

His comments prompted a drop in oil prices on Monday, as investors eased their concerns about potential supply disruptions from Iran, an OPEC member. Analysts at ING, including Ewa Manthey and Warren Patterson, noted that the downward move in oil was also influenced by "a broader correction across financial markets."

Futures slip

Gold and silver keep tumbling

Bitcoin extends slide

Oracle outlines new fundraising plans

Disney to report

Source: investing

The bond market is bracing for the U.S. Treasury's upcoming debt issuance announcement on Wednesday, with most participants expecting no major changes. However, the Trump administration's recent aggressive financial interventions have put investors on high alert for a surprise move designed to cap rising yields.

Steady Auction Sizes Expected for Now

Current consensus points to the Treasury maintaining its quarterly refunding auctions at $125 billion, a level held since May 2024. This marks the longest period of unchanged sales since the mid-to-late 2010s, when auction totals were less than half of today's figures.

The department may also reaffirm its previous guidance to keep sales of interest-bearing securities stable for "at least the next several quarters." This approach contrasts with earlier suggestions from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who had signaled a preference for issuing more long-dated securities before taking office. That strategy now appears unattractive, as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note—a key metric for Bessent—hovers around 4.25%, a full 80 basis points higher than 12-month bills.

Growing Pressure to Manage Long-Term Yields

Despite the expected stability, persistent federal budget deficits mean the Treasury will eventually need to increase its auctions of securities with maturities longer than one year. The central debate among investors is whether this move will be delayed until 2027.

There is also growing speculation that the Treasury might scale back issuance of its longest-dated debt to temper yields. This follows a global trend, with governments in Europe and Japan reducing their sales of 30-year bonds in response to weakening investor demand.

"The real focus will be whether they are looking to adjust coupon sizes lower in light of high bill demand," said Guneet Dhingra, head of U.S. interest-rate strategy at BNP Paribas. While he anticipates unchanged auction sizes this quarter, Dhingra has floated the idea that the government could eliminate the 20-year bond, which was revived in 2020 to a lukewarm reception.

The Federal Reserve Factor

The Treasury has gained some flexibility thanks to the Federal Reserve. In December, the Fed announced it would purchase $40 billion in T-bills per month until April. While this move is tied to managing bank reserves and not monetary policy, it effectively reduces the amount of short-term debt the Treasury needs to sell to private investors.

The Fed's future role in the bond market gained new attention following President Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh to lead the central bank in May. Warsh, a former Fed governor, has advocated for a "new accord" with the Treasury to clarify the strategy for managing its massive bond portfolio, though he has not yet detailed his plans.

Conflicting Signals and the Predictability Promise

Any hint of a cut in bond sales on Wednesday would be a surprise, especially after the Treasury's November statement indicated it had "begun to preliminarily consider future increases" to coupon-bearing debt sales. At the time, the department noted it was "evaluating trends in structural demand."

Since then, the Trump administration has taken extraordinary steps to address voter concerns about affordability, including ordering large-scale purchases of mortgage bonds and attempting to cap credit-card rates. These actions have led analysts to question if a more activist approach to debt management is coming.

"Investors have naturally asked whether Treasury could be considering a more activist shift in its debt management strategy in order to help facilitate the administration's goals of lower long-term yields," wrote JPMorgan Chase & Co. strategists led by Jay Barry.

This sentiment is echoed by traders. Ben Jeffery at BMO Capital Markets noted, "we've even heard chatter around the potential for calling off 20s entirely, or even reducing 30-year issuance in favor of boosting bill auction or 2-year auction sizes instead."

A sudden change would conflict with the Treasury’s long-held philosophy of being "regular and predictable" in its issuance strategy—a principle Secretary Bessent publicly endorsed at a conference in November.

Future Focus: The "Belly" and Inflation-Protected Bonds

Looking ahead, if the Treasury does increase coupon sales, many expect the focus to be on the 2- to 7-year part of the curve, often called the "belly" by investors.

"They can increase pro-rata across the board, or they can say the market is demanding these sort of belly securities," explained Amar Reganti, a fixed income strategist at Hartford Funds and a former official at the Treasury's Office of Debt Management. "Our model is telling us that that's a place where we've had historically the best issuance."

Market participants will also watch for any adjustments to two other areas:

• The Treasury's program for buying back older, outstanding securities.

• Sales of Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS).

Several banks are forecasting an increase in at least one of the three upcoming TIPS auctions. After a series of increases, the Treasury paused the pattern last year, but stronger demand for the 5-year TIPS could lead to a $1 billion increase in its new issue, bringing the total to $27 billion.

Steven Zeng, an interest-rate strategist at Deutsche Bank, suggested that with the TIPS share of total debt still trending down, "there may be just enough for Treasury to eke out one more increase. It is a close call though."

Iran is evaluating the terms for restarting negotiations with the United States, a foreign ministry official confirmed Monday. The statement comes as both sides signal a readiness to revive diplomatic efforts to resolve the long-standing nuclear dispute and ease fears of a new regional conflict.

The potential for renewed talks unfolds against a backdrop of high tension. A recent U.S. Navy military buildup near Iran has heightened concerns, following a deadly crackdown on anti-government protests last month—the most severe domestic unrest in Iran since the 1979 revolution.

U.S. President Donald Trump, who threatened but ultimately did not intervene in the protests, has since demanded nuclear concessions from Tehran and dispatched a naval flotilla to its coast. Last week, Trump stated that Iran was "seriously talking." Echoing this, Tehran's top security official, Ali Larijani, posted on X that arrangements for negotiations were underway.

US Preconditions and Iran's Sticking Points

Iranian sources reported last week that President Trump has laid out three core preconditions for resuming talks:

• Zero enrichment of uranium in Iran.

• Strict limits on Tehran's ballistic missile program.

• An end to its support for regional proxies.

Tehran has historically rejected all three demands as infringements on its sovereignty. However, two Iranian officials told Reuters that the country's clerical leadership views the ballistic missile program as a more significant obstacle to a deal than its uranium enrichment activities.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei noted that Tehran was considering "the various dimensions and aspects of the talks," adding that "time is of the essence for Iran as it wants lifting of unjust sanctions sooner."

The Path to Renewed Diplomacy

A potential meeting between U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi could take place in Turkey in the coming days, according to a senior Iranian official and a Western diplomat. A Turkish ruling party official confirmed to Reuters that both Tehran and Washington have agreed to focus this week's discussions on diplomacy, potentially averting U.S. military action.

An Iranian official stated that "diplomacy is ongoing." He elaborated on Tehran's stance: "For talks to resume, Iran says there should not be preconditions and that it is ready to show flexibility on uranium enrichment, including handing over 400 kg of highly enriched uranium (HEU), accepting zero enrichment under a consortium arrangement as a solution."

However, Tehran has its own condition for starting talks: the removal of U.S. military assets from its vicinity. "Now the ball is in Trump's court," the official added.

Regional Pressures and Sanctions

Tehran's regional influence has been diminished by Israeli attacks on its proxies—including Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and various militias in Iraq. The ousting of Syria's Bashar al-Assad, a close ally of Iran, has also weakened its position. Last year, the United States joined a 12-day Israeli bombing campaign by striking Iranian nuclear targets.

Previous talks, which stalled in May 2023 after five rounds, left several critical issues unresolved. These included Iran's insistence on maintaining uranium enrichment on its own soil and its refusal to ship its entire stockpile of highly enriched uranium abroad.

Since the U.S. strikes on three of its nuclear sites in June, Tehran claims its uranium enrichment has ceased. The U.N.'s nuclear watchdog has repeatedly asked Iran to clarify the status of its HEU stock since the attacks. Western nations remain concerned that Iran's enrichment activities could produce material for a nuclear warhead, though Iran maintains its program is solely for civilian energy and other peaceful uses.

Iranian sources suggest Tehran could agree to ship its highly enriched uranium abroad and pause enrichment activities as part of a comprehensive deal that would also include the lifting of economic sanctions.

The Bank of England is widely expected to keep interest rates on hold this week, but the key question for markets is whether policymakers will signal an earlier-than-expected rate cut.

Based on the Bank's surprisingly hawkish tone in December, such a signal seems unlikely for now. While officials did cut rates, they hinted that the "cadence of rate cuts" could slow down—a cautious message for a central bank that was already moving slowly.

As interest rates approach a neutral level, the decision to cut further becomes more complex. With UK inflation at 3.4% in December, well above the target, hawks on the committee remain concerned that easing policy too soon could trigger a new wave of price pressures, mindful of the inflation spike in 2022.

Mixed Signals Keep the BoE on Hold

Since the last meeting, economic data has not provided a clear direction. A single round of data showed weak jobs numbers offset by stronger Purchasing Managers' Indices (PMIs). Inflation in December also came in slightly higher than anticipated.

A crucial metric for the Bank, the 'Decision Maker Panel' survey, revealed that corporate wage growth expectations are holding steady at 3.7%. This survey was cited multiple times in the previous meeting's minutes as a key reason for the Bank's cautious approach.

Given this backdrop, a 7-2 vote to keep rates unchanged is the most probable outcome. Known doves Alan Taylor and Swati Dhingra are almost certain to vote for a rate cut. Fellow dove Dave Ramsden might join them, although his comments after the December meeting suggested he was prepared to pause.

The Case for Looser Policy Is Building

Despite the current hesitation, there are compelling reasons to believe the Bank’s tightening cycle is over and rate cuts are approaching.

• Weakening Labor Market: Hiring surveys continue to deteriorate, suggesting last year's 1% decline in private sector employment will extend into 2026.

• Cooling Wage Growth: Private sector pay growth has already fallen from 6% at the start of 2025 to 3.6%. Forecasts indicate it will soon hit 3%, aligning with pre-COVID averages when the job market was strong but interest rates were much lower.

• Falling Inflation: Headline inflation is projected to drop dramatically from 3.4% in December to 1.8% by April. This is largely driven by lower food and water inflation, with food prices already running nearly a full percentage point below the Bank’s November forecast.

Core services inflation is also expected to moderate. While the most significant drops will appear in April's data, released in May, upcoming releases before the March meeting should provide early evidence of cooling prices, especially in key areas like restaurants and cafés.

A March Surprise Remains on the Table

In December, the Bank of England acknowledged that upside risks to inflation were diminishing. By the time policymakers meet in March, they will have two more rounds of data to confirm this trend.

A rate cut next month remains a distinct possibility—certainly higher than the 20% probability currently priced in by markets.

However, it is doubtful the Bank will explicitly open the door to a March cut this week. Officials are unlikely to alter their forward guidance, which emphasizes that decisions become more balanced as rates near neutral. In the subsequent press conference, Governor Andrew Bailey is not expected to talk up a March cut, despite his recent alignment with the doves. The Bank of England generally avoids commenting on market pricing unless it significantly deviates from its own thinking, which is not the case at present.

This week's mantra will likely be to keep all options on the table and let the incoming data guide future decisions.