Trump Says He's Seeking $1 Billion From Harvard University

Economic

Summary:

Trump said "we are now seeking one billion dollars in damages" from Harvard University after the New York Times reported that his administration had backed off on demands for $200 million to satisfy accusations of wrongdoing by the Ivy League institution.

President Donald Trump said "we are now seeking one billion dollars in damages" from Harvard University after the New York Times reported that his administration had backed off on demands for $200 million to satisfy accusations of wrongdoing by the Ivy League institution.

"This case will continue until justice is served," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform late Monday night. He asserted that Harvard had been "feeding a lot of 'nonsense' to the failing New York Times."

In an article earlier Monday, the Times reported that administration officials had dropped their demands for the $200 million "amid sagging approval ratings for Mr. Trump, and as he faces outrage over immigration enforcement tactics and the shooting deaths of two Americans by federal agents in Minnesota."

In his Truth Social post, Trump not specify under what authority he would seek the $1 billion. Harvard didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

In a later post after midnight Tuesday, Trump called the Times article "completely wrong" and demanded that it be changed.

Since the beginning of his second administration, Trump and his administration have waged an aggressive campaign against Harvard and other universities over accusations of antisemitism linked in part to campus protests against Israel's military campaign in the Gaza Strip.

Conservatives have also long contended that they and their ideas have largely been frozen out of American academia by a liberal establishment, and they now have allies in the Trump administration.

Harvard sued the government twice and won a court victory in September when a federal judge ruled that the US illegally halted research funding and said the administration "used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country's premier universities."

The administration said it would appeal that ruling, but the frozen funds have been largely restored. Unlike other Ivy League universities such as Columbia and Brown, Harvard hasn't reached a settlement with the White House.

In December, Harvard announced that its president, Alan Garber, had agreed to stay on for "an indefinite time beyond" mid-2027, extending his leadership of the oldest and richest US university.

Source: Bloomberg Europe

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

A Broad Purchase Commitment Anchors The Deal

India has agreed to buy petroleum, defence goods, electronics, pharmaceuticals, telecom products and aircraft from the United States under a newly announced trade agreement, according to a senior government official familiar with the discussions. The purchases form part of a first tranche of a broader U.S.–India trade framework that will be negotiated further in the coming months.

U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Monday that Washington would slash tariffs on Indian goods to 18% from as high as 50%. In return, India committed to halting purchases of Russian oil, lowering trade barriers and significantly expanding imports of American products. Trump said India had agreed to “buy American at a much higher level,” including energy, coal, technology, agricultural goods and other products, potentially amounting to $500 billion over time.

Reducing The Bilateral Trade Imbalance

According to the Indian official, the agreement is designed in part to narrow the trade deficit the United States runs with India. Data from India’s commerce ministry show that Indian exports to the U.S. rose 15.88% year-on-year to $85.5 billion in the January–November period, while imports from the U.S. stood at $46.08 billion. Expanding imports of U.S. energy, defence and capital goods is therefore intended to rebalance trade flows rather than disrupt India’s export momentum.

The commitment to buy U.S. products spans multiple strategic sectors and will be implemented over several years, indicating a phased approach rather than an immediate surge in imports. India has also offered market access in certain agricultural products, though specific details have not yet been disclosed.

Tariff Cuts And Sector-Specific Concessions

As part of Washington’s initial demands, India has agreed to cut tariffs on automobiles, a politically sensitive sector that has long been a point of friction in bilateral trade talks. While the current agreement addresses urgent trade imbalances, officials stressed that it represents only the first step toward a more comprehensive deal that will be negotiated in subsequent rounds.

The structure of the agreement reflects a pragmatic compromise. Lower U.S. tariffs provide immediate relief for Indian exporters, while India’s commitments on energy and defence procurement align with longer-term strategic and security interests.

Markets Respond With A Relief Rally

Financial markets reacted positively to the announcement. India’s benchmark Nifty 50 rose nearly 3% in early trading, while the rupee strengthened more than 1% to around 90.40 per dollar. The rally reflects renewed investor confidence after months of uncertainty, during which the absence of a U.S. trade deal weighed heavily on Indian assets.

The relationship between the agreement and market performance is largely causal, as reduced tariff barriers improve earnings visibility for exporters and lower the risk premium applied to Indian equities and currency markets.

A Foundation For Deeper Economic Alignment

While many operational details remain to be finalized, the scope of the initial agreement signals a meaningful shift in U.S.–India economic relations. By combining tariff relief with large-scale commitments in energy, defence and aviation, the deal goes beyond a narrow trade fix and lays the groundwork for deeper strategic alignment.

As further tranches are negotiated, the effectiveness of the agreement will depend on execution timelines, sector-specific implementation and follow-through on both sides. For now, the announcement has delivered what markets were waiting for: clarity, momentum and a credible pathway toward a more balanced and durable trade relationship between the two economies.

Source: AP

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Nathaniel Wright

Remarks of Officials

Data Interpretation

Economic

Central Bank

Forex

Daily News

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has increased its cash rate by 0.25 percentage points to 3.85%, a move widely anticipated by markets. The decision comes in response to persistent inflation and surprisingly strong growth in private sector demand.

The RBA's Monetary Policy Board noted that while some indicators suggest an easing, the labor market remains tight. This combination of renewed price pressures and a robust economy left the central bank with little choice but to continue its tightening cycle.

Updated Forecasts Signal a Hawkish Stance

Alongside the rate decision, the RBA released revised economic forecasts that paint a picture of stronger near-term growth and, crucially, higher inflation.

The upgrades to the inflation outlook are significant. The new projections imply quarterly trimmed mean inflation will run at about 0.9% for the next two quarters before settling into a 0.7% quarterly pace. According to this forecast, annual trimmed mean inflation will still be at 3.2% by the end of 2026, remaining above the RBA's target.

The central bank expects the temporary factors driving recent price spikes to fade after mid-2024. At the same time, restrictive monetary policy is projected to cool the economy, guiding inflation back toward the 2–3% target range by mid-2028, with the forecast ending at 2.6%.

Despite this long-term path, the RBA Governor expressed discomfort with inflation remaining above the 2.5% midpoint so far into the future. This sentiment underscores the bank's commitment to bringing inflation under control.

What's Driving the RBA's Thinking?

The RBA's latest move was heavily influenced by a series of strong underlying inflation reports. This data, combined with stronger-than-expected private demand and a labor market that appears to have stopped easing, convinced the board that more action was needed.

The Role of Supply Capacity

A key theme in the RBA's analysis is its assessment of the economy's supply capacity. The bank now believes capacity constraints were tighter in late 2025 than previously thought, contributing to higher inflation.

However, this analysis raises a critical question about a potential feedback loop. The RBA appears to revise its estimates of supply capacity downward each time it is surprised by a high inflation reading. While the bank maintains it doesn't react mechanically to past data, this pattern effectively links its future forecasts to recent inflation surprises. For example, recent data has led the RBA's models to suggest a higher NAIRU (the unemployment rate consistent with stable inflation), which in turn builds more inflationary pressure into its future projections.

The Labor Market Debate

While the RBA views the labor market as tight, the data presents a mixed picture. Of the 15 standard indicators the RBA tracks for labor market tightness, 11 have eased while only four have tightened. The bank appears to be placing significant weight on the few tightening indicators, particularly those from business surveys.

Long-Term Outlook and Policy Path

To achieve its inflation target, the RBA's forecasts outline a sustained period of sluggish economic growth. GDP is expected to grow at a rate below the RBA's own pessimistic 2% estimate of trend supply capacity. With the unemployment rate still rising at the end of the forecast period, it raises the possibility that inflation could eventually fall below the target if the timeline were extended. This outlook supports the view that while rates are rising now, cuts could be on the table in late 2027 or early 2028.

Other Economic Factors

Exchange Rate: The Australian dollar has appreciated noticeably since the last forecast, which should theoretically help dampen inflation. However, the RBA has downplayed this factor, attributing the currency's strength primarily to the domestic interest rate outlook rather than broader factors like the sell-off in the U.S. dollar. This may understate the disinflationary impact the exchange rate could have in the coming quarters.

Productivity and Investment: The RBA Governor has emphasized the role of the Productivity Commission in identifying policies to lift economic efficiency. However, this focus may overlook the crucial contributions of capital accumulation and private-sector innovation. The RBA's own weak forecasts for housing and business investment offer little reason for optimism on this front.

What to Expect Next from the RBA

Governor Bullock gave no explicit forward guidance on the future path of interest rates. However, with forecasts showing inflation remaining uncomfortably high even after this month's hike, further increases are clearly a possibility.

The RBA has set a low bar for another rate hike. The board will likely wait for the next quarterly inflation report before making its next move. Unless that report delivers a significant downside surprise, another rate hike in May appears likely.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

King Ten

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Remarks of Officials

Political

Energy

Russia has resumed large-scale missile and drone strikes on Ukraine's energy infrastructure, ending a temporary halt just as a new round of peace negotiations is scheduled to begin. The attacks signal the expiration of a brief pause reportedly brokered by former U.S. President Donald Trump.

Widespread Damage in Freezing Temperatures

Early Tuesday, major cities including Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa, and Dnipro came under fire amid freezing conditions that saw temperatures drop below -20°C (-4°F).

In Kharkiv, the attacks left at least 820 buildings, including multi-story apartment blocks, without heating, according to Mayor Ihor Terekhov.

Ukraine’s largest private energy company, DTEK, confirmed that its thermal power plants sustained significant damage to critical equipment. Monitoring channels also reported that energy facilities in central and western Ukraine were targeted. The renewed aerial assault prompted neighboring Poland to scramble military jets as a standard precaution to secure its airspace.

Diplomatic Context: A Pause Before Talks

The escalation comes just before Ukrainian, Russian, and U.S. officials are set to resume trilateral peace talks in the United Arab Emirates on Wednesday. This follows a two-day meeting in Abu Dhabi last month.

After those previous negotiations, Donald Trump stated that Russian President Vladimir Putin had agreed to his request for a weeklong pause in strikes on Kyiv and other cities due to the severe winter weather. In a reciprocal move, Ukraine said it would refrain from its own attacks on Russian oil refineries and other key facilities.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed on Friday that Putin had agreed to the pause until February 1. However, on Monday, Peskov gave no indication that the agreement would be extended. During this temporary halt on city strikes, Russian attacks on other targets, such as transportation infrastructure, continued.

Future Risks and Energy Sector Vulnerability

The fragility of Ukraine's energy system remains a critical concern. Maxim Timchenko, the CEO of DTEK, told Bloomberg on Monday that the company needs a ceasefire of at least two to three weeks to conduct necessary repairs and restore operations at its plants.

He warned that without a longer period of calm, he could not rule out the possibility of further blackouts this winter in Kyiv and other major urban centers.

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Isaac Bennett

China–U.S. Trade War

Remarks of Officials

Economic

Commodity

Political

The United States has announced a nearly $12 billion critical mineral reserve, a strategic move designed to reduce its dependence on China for materials vital to modern industry. Dubbed "Project Vault," the initiative aims to protect American manufacturers from supply chain disruptions.

At the White House on Monday, Donald Trump introduced the project, explaining its goal is to "ensure that American businesses and workers are never harmed by any shortage." He drew a parallel between this new stockpile and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which was established in the 1970s following the disruptive Arab oil embargo.

Understanding Project Vault's Funding and Scope

Project Vault will be financed through a combination of public and private funds, including a $10 billion loan from the U.S. Export-Import Bank and approximately $1.67 billion in private capital. The government-backed loan has a 15-year term, and the president expressed optimism that the government would profit from it.

The reserve will stockpile minerals essential for producing a wide range of goods, including vehicles, electronics, jet engines, and radar systems. This is intended to shield U.S. industries from the kind of supply pressures experienced during past trade disputes.

According to Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, 11 more countries will be announced as partners in the initiative later this week.

Responding to China's Market Dominance

The creation of the reserve is a direct response to China's overwhelming control of the global rare earths market. China currently controls about 70% of the world's rare earths mining and an estimated 90% of the processing capacity.

This dominance gives Beijing significant leverage, which it has used before. During trade talks last year, China restricted exports of rare earths needed for everything from electric vehicles to smartphones. "We don't want to ever go through what we went through a year ago," Trump said, referencing the confrontation with China.

This strategic vulnerability has prompted the U.S. to cultivate alternative sources and establish a national stockpile for these crucial elements. The U.S. government has previously supported the sector by taking stakes in miners like MP Materials and providing financial backing to firms such as Vulcan Elements and USA Rare Earth.

A Diplomatic Push for Secure Supply Chains

The strategic reserve is set to be a central topic at an upcoming ministerial meeting on critical minerals. Hosted by Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the State Department on Wednesday, the event will feature a keynote address from Vice President JD Vance.

Officials from dozens of nations across Europe, Africa, and Asia are expected to attend. The meeting is also anticipated to feature the signing of several bilateral agreements aimed at improving and coordinating supply chain logistics. A statement from the State Department noted the gathering "will create momentum for collaboration" to secure reliable access to rare earths.

The announcement of Project Vault was made in the Oval Office with General Motors CEO Mary Barra and mining billionaire Robert Friedland, alongside members of the administration and congressional leaders.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Commodity

The Strategic Logic Behind The Deal

U.S. President Donald Trump framed a new trade agreement with India around a straightforward idea: lower U.S. tariffs in exchange for India cutting off Russian oil purchases and turning instead to Venezuelan and American crude. In theory, this would deprive Russia of a critical revenue stream used to fund its war in Ukraine, particularly since India and China now account for the bulk of Russia’s oil exports following Western sanctions.

The strategy rests on a simple chain of substitution. If India stops buying Russian oil and replaces it with Venezuelan supply, Russia loses both volume and pricing power. The logic is appealing, but the underlying market realities complicate execution.

Why Venezuelan Crude Looks Attractive On Paper

From a technical standpoint, Venezuela is one of the few producers capable of replacing Russian barrels for India. Venezuelan crude is heavy and sour, closely resembling Russia’s Urals blend. This matters because India’s refineries are configured to process exactly this type of oil into diesel, fuel oil, asphalt, and other industrial products vital to its fast-growing economy. By contrast, U.S. light sweet crude is better suited for gasoline and offers less flexibility for Indian refiners.

Following the U.S. removal of sanctions and the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, Caracas passed legal reforms aimed at reopening its oil sector to foreign investment. Analysts such as Homayoun Falakshahi of Kpler described the reforms as a positive step toward revitalizing the industry and attracting Western capital back into Venezuela’s oil fields.

Production Reality Limits Venezuela’s Role

Despite its vast reserves, Venezuela’s current production capacity is sharply constrained. The country produces just over 1 million barrels per day, and nearly two-thirds of that supply already goes to China. Even if Venezuela diverted all of its exports to India, it would still fall short of replacing the roughly 1.5 million barrels per day that India imports from Russia.

Historically, Venezuela has demonstrated far greater capacity. Before the rise of Hugo Chávez’s socialist government in 1999, output exceeded 3 million barrels per day. However, decades of underinvestment, mismanagement, and infrastructure decay have left the industry unable to scale quickly. Restoring production to prior levels would require tens of billions of dollars annually for many years, along with deep involvement from major Western oil companies.

Here, structural risk becomes decisive. Foreign firms remain wary of Venezuela’s political instability, unclear rule of law, unresolved debts, and high royalties. While sanctions have been lifted and oil laws revised, key investor safeguards remain absent, limiting how quickly capital and expertise can realistically return.

India’s Economic Constraints And Inertia

Even if Venezuelan supply expanded, India cannot abruptly abandon Russian oil. Logistics alone pose challenges, as shipping routes from Venezuela are longer and more complex than those from Russia. Refinery adjustments and supply chain reconfiguration would take time, making any transition gradual rather than immediate.

Cost considerations are even more binding. Russian oil trades at a steep discount, roughly $16 per barrel below OPEC or U.S. benchmarks. This price advantage has been a central reason India continued buying Russian crude despite Western sanctions. Although falling global oil prices ease the burden slightly, replacing discounted Russian barrels with higher-priced alternatives would raise India’s import bill and strain domestic fuel economics.

Analysts such as Robert Yawger of Mizuho Securities also note that India has repeatedly found ways to bypass sanctions using shadow fleets and alternative trading channels. There is little evidence that a single trade deal will instantly override these entrenched practices.

Impact On Russia Likely Gradual, Not Decisive

Russia’s economy has already been pressured by sanctions, lower oil prices, inflation, and rising debt. Yet it has adapted through shadow shipping, higher taxes, and expanded domestic manufacturing. Losing India as an oil customer overnight would be damaging, but not catastrophic.

Still, Venezuelan oil introduces a new variable into the equation. Even partial and gradual reductions in Indian purchases of Russian crude could incrementally weaken Russia’s fiscal position over time. As Rob Haworth of U.S. Bank Asset Management noted, sustained erosion of oil revenues would create additional economic challenges for Russia and make prolonged war financing more difficult.

A Long Game With Limited Short-Term Payoff

Trump’s strategy does not fail outright, but its effectiveness depends on timelines measured in years, not months. Venezuela lacks the capacity to substitute Russian oil quickly, and India’s incentives to abandon discounted Russian supply remain weak. The outcome is less a decisive blow and more a slow pressure tactic, adding friction to Russia’s economic resilience rather than dismantling it.

In a conflict of enormous human cost, even marginal constraints on funding matter. But the Venezuelan oil card, while symbolically powerful, is unlikely to deliver the swift geopolitical leverage its architects envision.

Source: CNN

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Stocks

A Long-Awaited Deal Sparks A Powerful Market Repricing

Indian equities staged a dramatic rebound after New Delhi and Washington announced a trade agreement that materially lowered U.S. tariffs on Indian exports. The benchmark Nifty 50 jumped 5% at the open before paring gains to around 4%, still marking its strongest single-day performance in nearly six years if the rally holds.

U.S. President Donald Trump said the United States would cut reciprocal tariffs on Indian goods to 18% from 25% and that India would reduce tariff and non-tariff barriers against U.S. products to zero. While earlier U.S. measures had lifted total tariffs on India to as high as 50%, including a 25% penalty linked to India’s purchases of Russian oil, Reuters reported that the overall tariff burden has now been reduced to 18%, clarifying initial market confusion.

This clarification proved crucial for sentiment, as markets rapidly repriced expectations for trade flows, earnings, and capital inflows.

Energy Commitments And Geopolitical Realignment

Trump also said that during a call with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India agreed to halt purchases of Russian oil and instead significantly increase imports from the United States. Modi confirmed that “made in India” products would now face reduced tariffs in the U.S. and framed the agreement as part of a broader effort to support global stability and prosperity.

This energy shift represents a structural change in trade relationships rather than a short-term transaction. While it does not immediately alter global supply balances, it reshapes India’s external positioning and strengthens economic ties with its largest export market.

Why The Market Reaction Was So Strong

At the start of 2025, India had been widely expected to be among the first countries to reach a trade agreement with Washington. The prolonged absence of a deal became a growing drag on sentiment, creating what Citi Research described as a disconnect between India’s strong macroeconomic fundamentals and the weak performance of its financial assets.

Foreign investors exited Indian equities in record volumes, leaving the Nifty with gains of just over 10% in local currency terms for 2025. In dollar terms, performance was even weaker due to rupee depreciation, with the MSCI India index gaining only 4.29% compared with a 33.57% rise in the MSCI Emerging Markets index. The rupee emerged as Asia’s worst-performing currency last year, weighed down by trade uncertainty and persistent capital outflows.

Against this backdrop, the tariff reduction came in materially better than market consensus. Trideep Bhattacharya of Edelweiss Asset Management said the agreement exceeded expectations and, when combined with the recently concluded India–EU trade deal, could represent one of the strongest external growth impulses for India in 2026. The relationship here is causal rather than coincidental, as lower trade barriers directly improve export competitiveness, earnings visibility, and investor confidence.

Currency Relief Reinforces The Equity Rally

The trade breakthrough also triggered a sharp move in currency markets. The Indian rupee strengthened about 1% following the announcement, last trading near 90.29 per dollar. This rebound reflects easing concerns over India’s external balance and the potential for renewed foreign inflows now that a key source of policy uncertainty has been removed.

Radhika Rao of DBS Bank described the agreement as unequivocally positive for exports, sentiment, and financial markets, noting that high tariffs had been a central drag on confidence over the past quarter. A stronger rupee, in turn, reinforces equity gains by improving dollar-based returns for international investors, creating a reinforcing loop between currency and stock market performance.

A Structural Reset For Indian Assets

The sharp rally in the Nifty 50 is best understood as a relief move layered on top of a deeper structural reset. Markets are not simply reacting to a headline, but reassessing India’s position in global trade, its attractiveness to foreign capital, and its earnings outlook in a lower-tariff environment.

If implementation follows through, the deal has the potential to narrow the performance gap between Indian assets and the broader emerging market universe. After a year in which strong domestic fundamentals failed to translate into market returns, the trade agreement provides a clear mechanism for that gap to begin closing in 2026.

Source: CNBC

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

Trump Says He's Seeking $1 Billion From Harvard University

Source: Bloomberg Europe

India Commits to Buying U.S. Energy, Defence and Aircraft in First Phase of Trade Deal

A Broad Purchase Commitment Anchors The Deal

Reducing The Bilateral Trade Imbalance

Tariff Cuts And Sector-Specific Concessions

Markets Respond With A Relief Rally

A Foundation For Deeper Economic Alignment

Source: AP

RBA Hikes Rate to 3.85% Amid Stubborn Inflation

Updated Forecasts Signal a Hawkish Stance

What's Driving the RBA's Thinking?

Long-Term Outlook and Policy Path

What to Expect Next from the RBA

Russia Hits Ukraine Energy Grid as Fragile Ceasefire Ends

Widespread Damage in Freezing Temperatures

Diplomatic Context: A Pause Before Talks

Future Risks and Energy Sector Vulnerability

US Launches $12B Mineral Reserve to Counter China's Grip

Understanding Project Vault's Funding and Scope

Responding to China's Market Dominance

A Diplomatic Push for Secure Supply Chains

Venezuela’s Oil Gambit Exposes the Limits of Trump’s Plan to Squeeze Russia

The Strategic Logic Behind The Deal

Why Venezuelan Crude Looks Attractive On Paper

Production Reality Limits Venezuela’s Role

India’s Economic Constraints And Inertia

Impact On Russia Likely Gradual, Not Decisive

A Long Game With Limited Short-Term Payoff

Source: CNN

India Markets Roar Back as U.S. Trade Breakthrough Unlocks Long-Suppressed Optimism

A Long-Awaited Deal Sparks A Powerful Market Repricing

Energy Commitments And Geopolitical Realignment

Why The Market Reaction Was So Strong

Currency Relief Reinforces The Equity Rally

A Structural Reset For Indian Assets

Source: CNBC

Risk Disclosure