Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



U.K. Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Services PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Composite PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services PMI Prelim (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Economic Activity Index YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Russia Trade Balance (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Services PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. IHS Markit Composite PMI Prelim (SA) (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Expectations Index Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Coincident Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Lagging Economic Index MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Final (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Leading Economic Index (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Business Expectations Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany IFO Business Climate Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Germany Ifo Current Business Situation Index (SA) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Brazil Current Account (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Unemployment Rate (Not SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada National Economic Confidence Index--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Excl.Transport) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Durable Goods Orders MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Chicago Fed National Activity Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed New Orders Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed General Business Activity Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. BRC Shop Price Index YoY (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Industrial Profit YoY (YTD) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Trade Balance (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index YoY (Not SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. S&P/CS 20-City Home Price Index MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. FHFA House Price Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Composite Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Present Situation Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Expectations Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Shipments Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Richmond Fed Services Revenue Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Australia RBA Trimmed Mean CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Australia CPI QoQ (Q4)--
F: --
P: --















































No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
President Donald Trump's investments in municipal and corporate debt through December included bonds of some companies affected by his administration's policies.
President Donald Trump's investments in municipal and corporate debt through December included bonds of some companies affected by his administration's policies.
In all, the issues cost at least $51 million.
The new White House disclosure posted Thursday shows Trump's buys included bonds from Netflix Inc., CoreWeave Inc., General Motors Co., Boeing Co., Occidental Petroleum Corp. and United Rentals Inc. He also purchased municipal bonds from American cities and local school districts, utilities and hospitals.
The report, which all federal elected officials and appointees who trade must submit, doesn't specify exact amounts or prices, since only broad ranges of transactions involving stocks, bonds, commodity futures and other securities are required. Trump reported making 189 purchases and two sales, the latter for at least $1.3 million, between Nov. 14 and Dec. 29 of last year.
The disclosure was dated Jan. 14 and approved by a White House ethics official the following day. The president also amended an earlier report, changing the value of four transactions.
The investments are just the latest example of how Trump has continued to build wealth during his presidency. He has also regularly mixed his personal business with official duties, drawing questions about potential conflicts of interest.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In August, Trump reported 690 transactions he'd made since returning to the White House in January 2025, totaling at least $104 million. He made further transactions disclosed in November and December that totaled $106 million, including three other sales with a value of $2 million.
When the August report was issued, a senior White House official said that neither Trump nor any of his family members made the investment decisions. Independent financial managers made the bond purchases using programs that replicate recognized indexes when making investments, the official said, adding that the Office of Government Ethics signed off on the filings.
Unlike his predecessors, Trump didn't divest or move his assets into a blind trust with an independent overseer. His sprawling business empire is managed by two of his sons and operates in several areas that intersect with presidential policy.
Trump has promoted Boeing Co. aircraft on visits to foreign capitals, and touted the company's sales of planes to airlines in Qatar, Japan and other countries.
While visiting a Ford Motor Co. factory in Detroit on Tuesday, Trump highlighted rival the plans of a rival, General Motors Co., to shift production of the Chevrolet Blazer and Equinox from Mexico back to the US, claiming the move shows the success of his tariff policies in bolstering domestic manufacturing.
Netflix is currently locked in a contentious fight with Paramount Skydance Corp. for Warner Bros. Discovery Inc., setting up a major antitrust test for Trump's administration regardless of who wins the merger fight. Trump has said he plans to be personally involved in reviewing whichever merger succeeds and Hollywood has been watching the president closely for any indication of how he is sizing up the battle for an iconic studio.
The United Kingdom’s clean-energy sector is at risk of widespread job losses if global supply chains face disruption, with a new report highlighting the country's heavy reliance on China to meet its climate targets.
According to modeling by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), a year-long interruption from primary suppliers of battery components could eliminate as many as 90,000 UK jobs. Such a shock would also halt the production of over 580,000 electric vehicles starting from 2030.
The report, published Friday, warns that the UK's vulnerability extends beyond batteries to solar panels, steel, and critical minerals. These dependencies threaten the national transition to net-zero carbon emissions and could damage regional economies already weakened by industrial decline.
Pranesh Narayanan, a senior research fellow at IPPR, explained the danger: "Trump's trade war with China, the rise of conflicts around the world – these shocks ultimately hurt the UK economy because we rely so much on trade to source the essentials, including clean energy technologies."
The UK's plan to scale up domestic battery manufacturing by 2030 remains deeply dependent on foreign imports. Currently, the UK sources approximately one-third of its battery imports from China, while Japan is the leading supplier of essential components like cathodes and anodes.
A major supply chain disruption would force domestic carmakers to cede market share to Chinese electric-vehicle manufacturers. The report notes that BYD Co. is already projected to increase its UK market share from 0.5% to 2.5% by 2025. The impact would also create a ripple effect, affecting other critical industries such as rail, aerospace, and defense manufacturing.
The IPPR report expresses particular concern over the supply of critical minerals, which are essential for manufacturing everything from battery parts to the permanent magnets used in wind turbines.
China dominates the global refinement of most of these minerals and has previously used export controls on materials in scarce supply. This gives Beijing significant leverage over the global clean-energy transition.
Furthermore, the think tank estimated that delays in solar energy deployment, coupled with a continued reliance on gas, could add around £1.5 billion ($2 billion) annually to the UK's energy import costs.
To counter these vulnerabilities, the IPPR outlined several key policy recommendations aimed at increasing the UK's energy resilience. The government is urged to:
• Invest directly in domestic production capabilities.
• Diversify supply chains by strengthening partnerships with allies.
• Build strategic stockpiles of critical components and materials.
• Establish a clear and coherent stance on Chinese involvement in the most critical supply chains.
"The UK is a small open trading nation sailing through an international economy whose waters are getting choppier by the day," Narayanan concluded.
The European Central Bank has no immediate plans to alter interest rates, signaling a steady policy path as long as the Eurozone economy remains on track. However, ECB chief economist Philip Lane has warned that potential shocks, particularly a deviation by the U.S. Federal Reserve from its mandate, could disrupt this stable outlook.
Since ending a cycle of rate cuts in June, the ECB has maintained its policy, buoyed by surprisingly strong economic growth and inflation that appears to be stabilizing around the 2% target for the next few years.
In an interview with Italian newspaper La Stampa, Lane confirmed that this stability means rate changes are not being actively considered. "In these circumstances, there is no near-term interest rate debate," he stated. "The current level of the interest rate delivers the baseline for the next several years."
Despite this confidence, Lane clarified that the ECB remains vigilant. "But if we see developments in either direction, we will react," he added.
A significant risk to the Eurozone's economic calm comes from across the Atlantic. Continued pressure on the U.S. Federal Reserve by President Donald Trump to lower borrowing costs more quickly than the central bank deems appropriate could trigger serious spillover effects.
Lane outlined several scenarios where a shift in Fed policy could create problems for Europe:
• Unstable U.S. Inflation: "It would be economically difficult for us if inflation in the U.S. did not return to target," he said.
• Financial Contagion: A change in U.S. financial conditions could lead to a "rising term premium" that impacts European markets.
• Dollar Volatility: A "reassessment of the future role of the dollar could also constitute a kind of financial shock to the euro."
"So there are scenarios where, if the Federal Reserve departed from its mandate, that would create a problem," Lane concluded. Unlike the ECB's primary focus on inflation, the Fed operates under a dual mandate to promote both maximum employment and stable prices.
Policy uncertainty in the United States has already had a tangible impact, causing the euro to strengthen sharply against the dollar last year. This has weakened the competitiveness of European exports at a time when they are already facing pressure from inexpensive Chinese goods in global markets.
While Lane expressed overall confidence in the Fed's commitment to its goals, market sentiment has shifted. After briefly pricing in a potential rate hike for late 2026 at the turn of the year, investors now widely expect the ECB's deposit rate to hold steady at 2% throughout this year.
Looking ahead, Lane anticipates a stronger cyclical recovery for the 21-nation Eurozone this year and next. However, he cautioned that the region's long-term potential growth remains low and will require deeper structural changes to accelerate.
Reviving Venezuela's oil production is a top priority for the White House in any post-Nicolás Maduro scenario. However, years of neglect have left the country's energy infrastructure in a state of decay, presenting a massive operational challenge. This is compounded by severe political and security risks, including potential power vacuums, military insurgency, and the influence of cartels.
With Maduro's Vice President, Delcy Rodriguez, currently serving as acting president, fears of instability remain high if opposition forces challenge the government in Caracas.
Venezuela sits on the world's largest proven oil reserves, but its ability to extract and refine that crude is crippled. The core problem is a derelict infrastructure that has been largely defunct for years.
To restart the sector, the administration is courting major oil companies. The key challenge is convincing these firms that they can operate safely and successfully not just for a few months, but for the long term. This unstable environment makes long-term investment a significant gamble.
To address these security concerns without deploying American troops, the Trump administration is reportedly considering a different approach: hiring private military contractors. President Trump is said to be wary of committing US soldiers to what could become another indefinite foreign occupation.

According to a CNN report, the administration is exploring the use of mercenaries to protect Venezuela's oil industry as American companies begin operations.
A Lucrative Opportunity for Security Firms
Discussions on securing oil assets are still in the early stages, but multiple private security companies are already maneuvering to get involved. The potential for a massive payday is driving this interest. For context, during the Iraq War, the US spent approximately $138 billion on private contractors for security, logistics, and reconstruction.
Signs of movement are already visible:
• The Department of Defense recently issued a Request for Information (RFI) to contractors about their capacity to support potential US military operations in Venezuela.
• Contractors have also reportedly contacted the State Department's overseas building operations office to express interest in providing security if the US embassy in Caracas reopens.
One military firm founder, Stern, described the dynamic bluntly: "Foreign investment comes back, and when it does, it brings a bunch of Navy SEAL dudes and Green Beret dudes and ninjas to keep them alive and safe. It'll look a lot like that in Venezuela."
Relying on private contractors is almost certain to attract intense scrutiny. Over the last two decades, particularly during the peak of the Iraq War, the US depended heavily on these firms. However, their involvement was marred by controversy, including accusations of war profiteering and the killing of Iraqi civilians.
The optics of "liberating" a country only to have foreign mercenaries arrive and enforce order can be damaging. The presence of heavily armed contractors can quickly undermine any narrative of benevolent intervention.
For now, US oil majors face significant risks with few guarantees, especially given the billions in investment required to rebuild Venezuela's oil sector. At a minimum, any company that moves in will need to hire its own security force.
It remains to be seen whether the Trump administration will directly fund major contracts for large mercenary firms. In situations like this, figures like Erik Prince are often seen circling the Pentagon, ready to offer their services.
Yemen's Saudi-backed presidential leadership council has accepted the resignation of Prime Minister Salem bin Breik and appointed Foreign Minister Shaya Mohsen Zindani as the country's new prime minister, the state news agency Saba reported on Thursday.
Bin Breik formally submitted the resignation, which was approved by the council, before Zindani was named to form the next cabinet, Saba said.
Yemen has been a source of heightened tensions in recent months between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
A UAE-backed separatist group, the Southern Transitional Council, gained control of areas across southern and eastern Yemen in December, advancing to within reach of the Saudi border, which the kingdom considered a threat to its national security. Saudi-backed fighters have since largely retaken those areas.
Sharp differences over a range of other issues from geopolitics to oil output have also been a cause of friction between the two Gulf powers.
Saudi Arabia and the UAE had previously worked together in a coalition battling the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen's civil war, which brought on one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.
Venezuelan interim president Delcy Rodriguez is urging lawmakers to overhaul the country's hydrocarbons law in a bid to attract fresh investment and boost struggling crude oil production.
Rodriguez stated that modifying the legislation would pave the way for new capital flows into undeveloped oil deposits that currently lack infrastructure.
This legislative push comes just two weeks after US troops captured her predecessor, Nicolas Maduro, in Caracas. Following the raid, US President Donald Trump announced that the United States would now control Venezuela's oil sales.
The move has left some American oil companies cautious, indicating they require stronger assurances before committing to new investments in the nation.
Adding to this context, a former Venezuelan oil official suggested that opening new production areas is likely a condition set by the United States.
The current legal framework, established under former president Hugo Chavez in 2005, enforces significant state control over the oil industry.
Under this system, Venezuela's crude production has plummeted from approximately 2.5 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2005 to around 1 million b/d today, according to government and industry data. Production has roughly doubled since 2021, a recovery partially driven by US sanctions waivers that allowed Chevron to increase investment in its joint ventures with state-owned PdV.
Despite the long-term recovery, Rodriguez presented legislators with a chart confirming a recent dip in output. Production fell by about 21,000 b/d in December, dropping to 1.147 million b/d from 1.168 million b/d in November. This decline coincided with heightened US military pressure in the region and the seizure of tankers carrying sanctioned Venezuelan crude.
However, Venezuela's current crude output remains over 10% higher than it was a year ago. The figures presented by Rodriguez also differed slightly from a previous report by the oil ministry, which had cited a production level of 1.12 million b/d for December.
Oil prices have stabilized after their biggest single-day drop since June, prompted by signals that the United States is postponing an immediate military attack on Iran.
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude traded near $59 a barrel after falling 4.6% on Thursday. The international benchmark, Brent crude, was trading below $64 a barrel.
The sharp reversal in prices followed a report from The New York Times indicating that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had asked U.S. President Donald Trump to hold off on plans for a military strike.
This development reduced market fears of an imminent U.S. response to recent unrest in Iran. Traders now see a lower probability of disruptions to either Iranian oil production or vital shipping lanes in the near term.
Despite the recent drop, oil is on track to end the week with little overall change. Prices had previously surged from January 8 on rising concerns that the U.S. would take action against Iran, which is OPEC's fourth-largest producer.
The market has also seen support from other supply-side issues, including ongoing upheaval in Venezuela and disruptions to Kazakh exports from the Black Sea.
However, these bullish factors are set against a weaker long-term trend. Oil prices just logged their worst year since 2020, driven by persistent worries that global production gains are outpacing sluggish demand growth.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features
Log In
Sign Up