• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
ASK
BID
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6939.02
6939.02
6939.02
6964.08
6893.47
-29.99
-0.43%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
48892.46
48892.46
48892.46
49047.68
48459.88
-179.09
-0.36%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23461.81
23461.81
23461.81
23662.25
23351.55
-223.30
-0.94%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
96.990
97.070
96.990
96.990
96.150
+1.020
+ 1.06%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.18491
1.18514
1.18491
1.19743
1.18491
-0.01211
-1.01%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.36835
1.36880
1.36835
1.38142
1.36788
-0.01258
-0.91%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4894.49
4894.49
4894.49
5450.83
4682.14
-481.82
-8.96%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
65.427
65.456
65.427
65.832
63.409
+0.175
+ 0.27%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

U.S. House Speaker Boris Johnson: Trump May “readjust” His Immigration Policy

Share

[Speaker Of The U.S. House Of Representatives: Confident Of Sufficient Votes To End Partial Government Shutdown By Tuesday] February 1st, According To Nbc News, U.S. House Speaker Johnson Said He Is Confident That There Will Be Enough Votes By At Least Tuesday To End The Partial Government Shutdown

Share

Iranian Official Tells Reuters: Media Reports Of Plans For Revolutionary Guards To Hold Military Exercise In Strait Of Hormuz Are Wrong

Share

Ukraine's Defence Minister Says Kyiv And Spacex Working On System To Ensure Only Authorized Starlink Terminals Work In Ukraine

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Europe Has Failed To Defeat Russia In Ukraine

Share

Nigerian Army Says It Killed A Boko Haram Commander And 10 Fighters

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: We Never Found The Two Nuclear Submarines Trump Spoke Of Deploying Closer To Russia

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Victory Will Come 'Soon' In Ukraine But Equally Important To Think Of How To Prevent New Conflicts

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Trump Is An Effective Leader Who Seeks Peace

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Behind The So Called 'Chaos' Of Trump, He Is An Effective And Original USA Leader

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Victory Will Come Soon In Ukraine War

Share

Ukraine President Zelenskiy: Next Round Of Trilateral Talks Set For Feb 4-5 In Abu Dhabi

Share

Russian Defence Ministry: Russia Gains Control Over Two Villages In Ukraine's Kharkiv And Donetsk Regions

Share

Trump Says India Will Buy Oil From Venezuela

Share

Istanbul Jan Consumer Price Index 4.56% Month-On-Month - Chamber Of Commerce

Share

Moody's: Interest Payments To Revenue Ratio Set To Worsen Next Year

Share

Moody's: Federal Government Fiscal Deficit Still Wider Than What It Was Prior To Covid

Share

Saudi Arabia's Stock Index Down 2.1% - Lseg

Share

Pakistan Balochistan Chief Minister Says 145 Militants Killed After Attacks Over 40 Hours

Share

Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei: If Americans Start A War This Time, It Will Be A Regional Conflict

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
U.K. M4 Money Supply (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Italy Unemployment Rate (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Unemployment Rate (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Prelim QoQ (SA) (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Prelim YoY (SA) (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Italy PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Mexico GDP Prelim YoY (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Brazil Unemployment Rate (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Africa Trade Balance (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Deposit Gowth YoY

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany CPI Prelim YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany CPI Prelim MoM (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany HICP Prelim YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany HICP Prelim MoM (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Core PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Core PPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada GDP MoM (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada GDP YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI MoM Final (Excl. Food, Energy and Trade) (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI YoY (Excl. Food, Energy & Trade) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Chicago PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Canada Federal Government Budget Balance (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland NBS Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland NBS Non-manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Composite PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Korea Trade Balance Prelim (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Japan Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Caixin Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Trade Balance (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Inflation Rate YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Core Inflation YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

India HSBC Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Commodity Price YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Russia IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Turkey Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Nationwide House Price Index MoM (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Nationwide House Price Index YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Germany Actual Retail Sales MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --
Italy Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Africa Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Brazil IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada National Economic Confidence Index

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Output Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Inventories Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing Employment Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing New Orders Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea CPI YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Monetary Base YoY (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Building Permits MoM (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    3487443 flag
    Today you but later you will
    3487443 flag
    3487443 flag
    The gold star rose slightly this week, then declined for an extended period.
    srinivas flag
    3487443
    Today you but later you will
    @Visitor3487443you do know that gold needs to be mined right?
    3487443 flag
    Did you know that from 1980 to 2000 there were many geopolitical crises, especially wars, even more frequent than now? Do you know about gold speculation and gold accumulation? The current sharp increase in gold prices is very similar to the period from 1978 to 1980. Gold hit its lowest point in 2015 and increased slightly each year until 2019, then surged before falling to 1600. By 2023, gold had increased sharply, and by 2026, it had far exceeded inflation. Gold is no longer a safe asset; it is currently a risky asset.
    3487443 flag
    The true value of gold ranges from $1600 to $2000.
    3487443 flag
    In 1979, gold was above $200 USD, then by June it had quadrupled in value in just a few months. From above $200 USD, gold surged to over $850 USD. At that time, its value was relatively high, especially considering inflation was over 13 percent. Just a few months later, gold plummeted back to above $300 USD.
    3505272 flag
    Has anyone updated the system? That's why your reasoning is correct.
    3505186 flag
    The app is lagging so badly, I can't watch anything.
    3505186 flag
    [100]It's me, Hieu@Chế độ khách3487443
    3507622 flag
    how to trade please guide me
    hong hong flag
    That USA showed a Roun right now
    hong hong flag
    United States they can show Iran right now
    3487443 flag
    3505186
    [100]It's me, Hieu@Chế độ khách3487443
    [100]It's me, kid@Chế độ khách3505186
    hsjskbdb flag
    Similarities: Both are driven by inflation concerns, geopolitical factors, and expectations of currency devaluation. However, they differ in that central banks are now making large-scale, continuous purchases (in China, India, Turkey, etc.), which is not purely speculative . ETFs and institutional allocations are more structural, and there is no extreme single speculative event like the Hunt brothers' manipulation in 1980. Therefore, the price movements are "very similar," but the support is more solid, and while bubble risks exist, they are not entirely the same. Regarding the current surge in gold prices and future prospects, you mentioned that "the increase will far exceed the inflation rate by 2026," which has already partially materialized in 2025-2026. Gold has risen from approximately $2000+ in 2023 to the current $5000+, far exceeding the cumulative CPI over the same period. Most institutions predict that gold will remain in the $5000-$6200 range in 2026 (UBS $6200 target, JPM $5055 average, etc.), with some optimists seeing a possible $7000+. Has gold already transformed from a "safe-haven asset" into a "risk asset"? This is a very sharp observation, and there is indeed disagreement in the market: The traditional view is that gold remains the ultimate safe haven, with low correlation to the stock market, and performs exceptionally well during periods of geopolitical risk, inflation, and a weak dollar. Multiple reports (JPM, VanEck, BIS, etc.) for 2025–2026 still emphasize its role as "insurance," hedging against currency devaluation and geopolitical risks. However, reality has changed: gold volatility has increased significantly in recent years (monthly gains sometimes exceeding 10% in 2025), and its correlation with certain risk assets (such as Bitcoin) has occasionally increased. In times of extreme liquidity tightening or a sharp rebound in risk appetite, gold may also experience short-term sell-offs (like in the early stages of interest rate hikes in 2022). Therefore, to some extent, gold has become partially "risk-averse"—it is no longer a zero-volatility capital-preserving tool, but rather a strategic asset with strong trends and cyclicality. Especially at high levels, speculative elements increase, and the risk of a correction is considerable. However, the mainstream consensus remains that gold still leans towards safety during systemic crises, rather than being a purely risky asset like stocks. Central bank buying and the global trend of de-dollarization have strengthened its "strategic reserve" status. Overall, your historical analogy is quite accurate; gold is indeed currently in a "frenzied + structural" phase similar to the late 1970s, but with more support from real demand. Short-term bullish sentiment remains strong, but whether a repeat of the 1980-1982-style major correction will occur after consolidation at high levels is one of the biggest uncertainties of 2026. What is your view on the probability of a correction? Or which specific driving factor are you more focused on?
    hsjskbdb flag
    Envious of Trump, who can freely control gold prices.
    hsjskbdb flag
    He even acted with Musk last time.
    3507933 flag
    hsjskbdb
    He even acted with Musk last time.
    @hsjskbdbin
    Joyce flag
    have any of you review the lumonel.com that I have been posting my earnings on here
    "ThatfxSniper📈" recalled a message
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          Silver Prices Tumble After Trump Rejects Tariffs

          Diana Wallace

          Political

          Commodity

          Remarks of Officials

          Economic

          Traders' Opinions

          Summary:

          Silver retreated after the U.S. deferred import tariffs, yet analysts foresee structural deficits sustaining its value.

          Silver's volatile start to the year has taken a sharp turn, with prices falling after President Donald Trump confirmed the U.S. would not impose import tariffs on the precious metal and other critical minerals for now. The decision offers a temporary reprieve to a market that had rallied 30% in the new year amid escalating supply concerns.

          White House Opts for Negotiation Over Tariffs

          In a series of proclamations, the White House announced it will not apply tariffs on processed critical minerals and their derivative products. Instead, the administration plans to pursue new trade agreements to bolster the supply of these materials, based on recommendations from the Secretary of Commerce.

          The statement highlighted the nation's dependence on foreign sources, noting that the U.S. lacks sufficient production capacity for processed minerals. As of 2024, the United States was 100% reliant on net imports for 12 critical minerals and at least 50% reliant for another 29.

          "The Secretary recommended that I negotiate agreements with foreign nations to ensure the United States has adequate critical mineral supplies and to mitigate the supply chain vulnerabilities as quickly as possible," the White House stated.

          However, the administration left the door open for future trade restrictions, adding that it may be "appropriate to impose import restrictions, such as tariffs, if satisfactory agreements are not reached in a timely manner."

          Immediate Market Impact: Silver Retreats from Highs

          The news triggered significant selling in the silver market. After touching a high of $93 an ounce, spot silver last traded at $90.09 an ounce, a decline of more than 3% on the day. Despite the drop, prices showed some resilience by bouncing off lows near $86 an ounce.

          Analysts believe the removal of the immediate tariff threat could ease liquidity issues that have plagued the silver market.

          "In the near-term, prices may consolidate in a range as tariff risks are reassessed and positioning normalises," said Ewa Manthey, Commodities Strategist at ING. "However, structural deficits, tight physical availability, and ongoing policy uncertainty suggest downside might be limited, with silver likely to remain well-supported on dips."

          Why Tariffs Were on the Table

          Market participants had been closely watching for this decision for months. The issue arose in November when silver and Platinum Group Metals (PGMs) were added to the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) 2025 List of Critical Minerals. This action prompted a Section 232 tariff investigation, giving the government 90 days to make a ruling.

          While gold, silver, and PGMs were exempt from global tariffs imposed last year due to their status as precious metals, fears persisted that silver, platinum, and palladium could face new levies because of their industrial importance.

          Although analysts considered tariffs an unlikely outcome, the lingering risk forced market players to maintain high U.S. stockpiles throughout most of 2025. This put immense pressure on the global supply chain, creating liquidity shortages as investment and industrial demand competed for limited supplies in London and China.

          Analyst Outlook: Short-Term Weakness, Long-Term Support

          While the tariff news has provided some relief to the supply crunch, analysts maintain that the market's underlying structural problems are far from over.

          Market analysts at BMO Capital Markets noted that the reactionary sell-off was expected. "As Trump has not categorically ruled out tariffs, we would expect this to be transient," they said.

          This view is shared by others who see persistent tightness in the global market. "The immediate heat may be off silver, but we can't expect the tightness to ease dramatically, especially as it's now tight in Asia as well," commented Rhona O'Connell, head of market analysis at StoneX.

          While U.S. supply issues have been addressed temporarily, the physical market remains sensitive to other potential disruptions, including China's new export restrictions. However, analysts at Metals Focus suggest these fears may be exaggerated.

          "Exporting silver from mainland China has always required a licence, and the list of qualifying companies is reviewed every two years," the firm explained. "This policy should not be interpreted as an export ban or a material shift in China's stance on silver exports. Instead, it represents a move towards stricter management of export licensing."

          Metals Focus anticipates that as inventories in London recover and Chinese exports normalize, the market dislocation will gradually ease. This could create some short-term price weakness, but they expect investors will quickly buy the dip, leading to "further upside for the silver price over the foreseeable future."

          Looking ahead, the firm expects ongoing supply issues to fuel volatility. A shortage of high-grade refining capacity has slowed the return of scrap silver to the market. This, "combined with an ongoing structural deficit in 2026, [means] above-ground bullion inventories have not been rebuilt as quickly as might have been expected."

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          US Appeals Court Ruling Raises Prospect Of Rearrest Of Pro-Palestinian Activist Mahmoud Khalil

          Devin

          Political

          Mahmoud Khalil speaks to people as they gather at Bryant Park, to participate in a "Stop starving Gaza" march during the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, in New York City, U.S., August 16, 2025. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

          Jan 15 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court ruled on Thursday that a judge had no jurisdiction to order the release of Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil from immigration detention, delivering President Donald Trump's administration a victory in its efforts to deport the pro-Palestinian activist.

          The 2-1 ruling by a panel of the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals opens the door to Khalil being rearrested after it ordered, opens new tab the dismissal of a lawsuit he filed challenging his initial detention.

          The court said that under the Immigration and Nationality Act, the district court that considered his lawsuit was not the proper forum to address his claims, which should have been heard through an appeal of a removal order from an immigration judge.

          Khalil was among the most prominent of a number of foreign students detained last year after engaging in pro-Palestinian activism on their college campuses. While the ruling is likely to be appealed, if it stands it could close off a legal avenue that many have used to challenge deportation orders.

          Thursday's ruling came from U.S. Circuit Judges Thomas Hardiman and Stephanos Bibas, both of whom were appointed by Republican presidents.

          "The scheme Congress enacted governing immigration proceedings provides Khalil a meaningful forum in which to raise his claims later on in a petition for review of a final order of removal," they wrote in an unsigned opinion.

          U.S. Circuit Judge Arianna Freeman dissented, saying Congress did not mean to foreclose meaningful judicial review over Khalil's claims that his detention and potential re-detention violate his free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.

          "Khalil claims that the government violated his fundamental constitutional rights," wrote Freeman, who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. "He has also alleged, and proven, irreparable injuries during his detention."

          Khalil in a statement said the ruling is "deeply disappointing, but it does not break our resolve." His lawyers vowed to appeal the ruling, which does not take immediate effect, preventing his re-detention for now.

          "The door may have been opened for potential re-detainment down the line, but it has not closed our commitment to Palestine and to justice and accountability," Khalil said.

          The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which oversees Immigration and Customs Enforcement, did not respond to a request for comment.

          PRO-PALESTINIAN CAMPUS ACTIVISTS TARGETED

          Khalil, a prominent figure in pro-Palestinian protests against Israel's war in Gaza, was arrested on March 8 by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan.

          Trump had called the protests antisemitic and vowed to deport foreign students who took part. Khalil became the first target of this policy.

          Though Khalil was initially detained in New York, by the time his lawyer sued over his detention there, immigration officials had moved him to New Jersey, leading his case to be transferred to a judge there.

          He walked out of a Louisiana immigrant detention center in June, after U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz of Newark, New Jersey, ordered the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to release him from custody.

          The Trump administration appealed, calling Farbiarz's ruling an "unprecedented" intrusion into its efforts to detain and deport a key figure in "violent and antisemitic riots and protests" that occurred at Columbia in 2024 over Israel's war.

          In September, an immigration judge ordered Khalil to be deported to Algeria or Syria over claims that he omitted information from his green card application. His lawyers have said they will appeal that order.

          Thursday's ruling came hours before a federal judge in Boston was scheduled to consider whether to block the Trump administration from arresting, detaining and deporting foreign students and faculty engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy, after he concluded last year that the policy was unconstitutional.

          Source: Reuters

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Whitmer: Trump's Auto Tariffs Hurt Detroit, Help China

          Ukadike Micheal

          Remarks of Officials

          China–U.S. Trade War

          A Tale of Two Policies in the Motor City

          Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer delivered a sharp rebuke of President Donald Trump's economic strategy at the Detroit Auto Show on Thursday, presenting a starkly different reality than the one Trump portrayed in the same city just two days earlier.

          Speaking to the heart of America's automotive industry, Whitmer, a Democrat in her final year as governor, argued that the administration's tariff policies are actively harming U.S. auto manufacturing while inadvertently boosting Chinese competitors.

          "This will only get worse without a serious shift in national policy," Whitmer warned, highlighting the economic uncertainty currently gripping the auto sector.

          Her comments directly countered President Trump's recent message. During a visit that included a tour of a Ford plant in Dearborn, Trump defended his economic record, stating confidently, "All U.S. automakers are doing great."

          Whitmer Details Damage to Manufacturing

          The governor painted a contrasting picture, asserting that American manufacturing has been contracting for months, resulting in job losses and cuts to production. Whitmer's opposition to the tariff strategy is long-standing, particularly given Michigan's deep economic ties with Canada.

          She emphasized the complex cross-border supply chain where auto parts frequently move between the U.S. and Canada during assembly. Disrupting this relationship, she argued, weakens the entire North American manufacturing base.

          "America stands more alone than she has in decades," Whitmer stated. "And perhaps no industry has seen more change and been more impacted than our auto industry."

          The White House did not provide an immediate comment on the governor's speech.

          The Geopolitical Chessboard: Canada and China

          A central theme of Whitmer's address was the geopolitical consequence of the administration's trade policy. She revealed that in every meeting with President Trump over the past year, she has argued that damaging the U.S.-Canadian relationship ultimately serves China's interests.

          "When we fight our neighbors, however, China wins," she said, framing the issue as a strategic misstep.

          This argument extends to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), a trade deal negotiated during Trump's first term. While Whitmer defended the agreement, Trump recently suggested it was "irrelevant" during his Detroit-area tour, offering few details on his position ahead of the agreement's scheduled review this year.

          A Calculated Political Approach

          Whitmer's public disagreement with Trump is notable for its measured tone, which marks a difference from her relationship with him during his first term. She has made several visits to the White House over the last year, adopting a less combative public stance than other potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidates like California's Gavin Newsom or Illinois's J.B. Pritzker.

          President Trump himself has adjusted his approach to auto tariffs. After initially announcing a 25% tariff on automobiles and parts, the administration later relaxed the policy as domestic manufacturers sought relief from the threat of escalating production costs.

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump's Venezuela Gambit: Machado Sidelined at White House

          Isaac Bennett

          Remarks of Officials

          Political

          Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado is meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House, a high-stakes discussion that comes just after Trump publicly questioned her ability to lead the nation. The meeting occurs in the shadow of a daring U.S. military raid that captured former President Nicolás Maduro, creating a power vacuum in the South American country.

          Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado is navigating a complex relationship with the Trump administration.

          Despite Machado's long-standing role as a face of the Venezuelan resistance, the Trump administration has signaled a surprising willingness to work with acting President Delcy Rodríguez, who served as Maduro's vice president. This move effectively sidelines Machado, who has spent years building relationships with Trump and key figures like Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

          Trump's Pivot to Maduro's Inner Circle

          President Trump has openly raised doubts about his administration's commitment to installing a new democratic government in Venezuela. By engaging with Rodríguez and other members of Maduro's inner circle who still control daily government operations, Trump is charting an unexpected course.

          The White House confirmed that since Maduro's ouster, the Venezuelan government has been fully cooperating. Rodríguez has softened her stance on Trump's "America First" policies and is continuing to release prisoners, including several Americans this week, in a move seen as a concession to the U.S. administration.

          On Wednesday, Trump described a "great conversation" with Rodríguez, their first since Maduro's capture. "We had a call, a long call. We discussed a lot of things," Trump said. "And I think we're getting along very well with Venezuela."

          This budding relationship stands in stark contrast to his comments on Machado. Hours after Maduro was detained, Trump stated it would be "very tough for her to be the leader," claiming she lacks "the support within or the respect within the country."

          Machado's Strategy and Background

          The White House stated that Machado requested the meeting with Trump without any set expectations. Her visit to Washington follows her party's widely recognized victory in the 2024 elections, which Maduro had rejected.

          Machado has navigated her relationship with Trump carefully. After winning the Nobel Peace Prize last year—an honor Trump has openly desired—she offered to share it with him, though the Nobel Institute rejected the proposal.

          Following her lunch with Trump, Machado is scheduled to hold a meeting at the Senate. The president referred to her as "a nice woman" but suggested their talks would not cover major issues.

          Her trip also coincides with another U.S. action in the Caribbean, where forces seized a sanctioned oil tanker allegedly tied to Venezuela. This is part of a wider American strategy to control the country's oil sector after U.S. forces captured Maduro and his wife in Caracas, bringing them to New York to face drug trafficking charges.

          A Long History of Opposition

          Machado, an industrial engineer and the daughter of a steel magnate, has been a prominent figure in Venezuelan opposition for two decades.

          Her political activism began in 2004 when Súmate, a non-governmental organization she co-founded, promoted a referendum to recall then-President Hugo Chávez. Although the referendum failed, Machado and other Súmate leaders were charged with conspiracy.

          In 2005, she again drew the ire of Chávez's government by meeting with President George W. Bush in Washington. A photograph of her shaking hands with Bush in the Oval Office became a lasting image of her alignment with U.S. interests.

          Nearly two decades later, she mobilized millions of Venezuelans against Maduro in the 2024 election. Despite credible evidence of her victory, ruling party loyalists declared Maduro the winner, triggering anti-government protests that were met with a brutal crackdown. After being briefly detained in Caracas early last year, Machado went into hiding, only reappearing publicly in Oslo when her daughter accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on her behalf.

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          S&P 500 leadership showing signs of broadening beyond tech

          Adam

          Economic

          After years of watching technology stocks drive the U.S. bull market, investors are betting the rally will broaden to industrial, healthcare and small-cap companies, with a chance they can catch up and assert market leadership.
          Stocks such as Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab and Broadcom (AVGO.O), opens new tab have buoyed the market's enduring rally, in which the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab has risen over 90% since the bull market began more than three years ago.
          But investors have become wary of expensive tech valuations amid uncertainty over the AI theme that propelled market gains, concerns that helped other stocks make inroads.
          Shares of industrial, healthcare and small-cap companies have outperformed the S&P 500 since the end of October, while the tech sector has declined. That rotation was on display on Wednesday as the S&P 500 tech sector (.SPLRCT), opens new tab fell more steeply than broader market indexes.
          "There is a lot of hope that this is going to be the year where we are going to see some true broadening of leadership," said Angelo Kourkafas, senior global investment strategist at Edward Jones. "The conditions are likely in place for that broadening to happen, especially when you sprinkle in and consider elevated valuations, there are some pockets of value that can be found looking beyond technology."
          Fourth-quarter earnings reports in coming weeks will factor into the broadening trend's durability. A wide swath of sectors is expected to show solid profits in 2026.
          "Strategists have been predicting better earnings for a long time, but I really think it has legs this year," said Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson, global investment strategist at Hartford Funds. "We're starting to see the AI benefits filtering through to such a broad collection of sectors."
          S&P 500 leadership showing signs of broadening beyond tech_1

          S&P 500 vs key sectors, market groups over recent weeks, shows broadening leadership

          'AVERAGE' S&P 500 STOCK NOT SO AVERAGE
          Tech and tech-related stocks led much of the bull run that began in October 2022, just before the launch of chatbot ChatGPT that sparked enthusiasm for AI-linked shares.
          Late last year, the trend began to turn. One factor has been concerns AI investments would not yield sufficient returns to justify elevated valuations, investors said.
          "With some questions being raised on tech, investors are looking at, what are other areas that I could invest in," said Keith Lerner, chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services.
          In another sign of broadening, the equal-weight version of the S&P 500 (.SPXEW), opens new tab, which is a gauge for the average stock in the index, has gained over 5% since the end of October. That tops a 1% rise for the standard S&P 500, which is more heavily influenced by heavyweight stocks.
          EARNINGS GROWTH FOR ALL SECTORS
          More expansive profit growth stands to support wider stock gains. Each of the 11 S&P 500 sectors is expected to show earnings up at least 7% this year, according to LSEG IBES.
          Megacaps have been responsible for a huge chunk of earnings growth, but their advantage over smaller companies is shrinking. The "Magnificent Seven," which includes Nvidia, Alphabet and Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab, are expected to grow earnings by 23.5% in 2026, against a 13% rise for the rest of the S&P 500, according to Tajinder Dhillon, head of earnings research at LSEG.
          "If, in fact, that gap in earnings growth narrows between the Mag 7 and everyone else, I think we'll get a broadening," said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Investment Management. "If it doesn't, then it's likely the Mag 7 will continue to be leadership."
          S&P 500 leadership showing signs of broadening beyond tech_2

          Expected S&P 500 sector earnings growth for 2026

          In a report this week titled "The Broadening Is Underway," Morgan Stanley equity strategist Michael Wilson said the median S&P 500 stock trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 19 times, against a P/E of 22 for the cap-weighted index.
          Improving valuations on top of strong earnings for the median or average stock could be a "wildcard" for 2026, Wilson said in the report.
          TECH'S DOMINANT MARKET PRESENCE
          To be sure, tech's massive presence - the sector accounts for one-third of the S&P 500's weight - means it likely will remain a force in U.S. stocks, while the market may struggle if tech falters.
          Over the past decade, the S&P 500 has never gained at least 10% on an annualized basis when the tech sector has lagged the aggregate performance of the other 10 S&P 500 sectors during those periods, according to Citi Wealth.
          Meanwhile, tech is generating outsized profits. The sector is expected to increase earnings by over 30% in 2026, against 15.5% for the S&P 500 overall.
          After last year recommending clients overweight in "growth" stocks, which include tech and other AI-exposed names, Jack Janasiewicz, portfolio manager at Natixis Investment Managers, said he has been suggesting to investors that they balance more with "value" stocks, which include financials and industrials.
          "I still think tech works. You don't want to be chasing it, but you also don't want to be underweight," Janasiewicz said, adding: "There is certainly a wider range of outcomes that you could see."

          Source: reuters

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Peru's Economy Slows as Copper Output Plummets

          Oliver Scott

          Data Interpretation

          Economic

          Central Bank

          Commodity

          Peru's economy expanded just 1.5% in November, a figure that fell far short of the 2.8% median forecast from economists. This unexpected slowdown, driven by a sharp drop in copper production, marks a significant setback for one of Latin America's standout economies.

          A Closer Look at November's Numbers

          The 1.5% year-over-year growth was a stark miss, aligning only with the single most pessimistic market forecast.

          According to data from Peru's national statistics institute, INEI, the economy contracted on a monthly basis, shrinking by 0.44% compared to October.

          Copper and Fishing Sectors Drag Down Performance

          The primary driver behind the slowdown was a 12% annual drop in copper production. While Peru's energy and mines ministry has not yet released detailed figures identifying which companies were affected, the impact on the national economy was clear.

          Adding to the pressure, the fishing sector also contracted by 17.9% year-over-year, though the institute noted that fishing seasons can vary significantly from one year to the next.

          Broader Economic Context and Outlook

          This weak performance contrasts with Peru's recent history as a regional economic leader, which has consistently posted faster growth and lower inflation than many of its peers.

          Before the release of the November data, the country's finance ministry had projected that the economy would grow by approximately 3.5% for the full year, a target now under pressure.

          Conflicting Signals from Labor and Monetary Policy

          Despite the slowdown in growth, other parts of the economy showed strength. In a separate report, INEI announced that the unemployment rate in Lima dropped to a record-low 5% in December, beating the median forecast of 5.9%.

          Meanwhile, Peru's central bank has held its key interest rate steady at 4.25%. This decision comes as the nation's currency approaches a six-year high and inflation remains below the central bank's target.

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Multifamily Delinquencies Rise Again, Hit New Post-Great Recession High

          Justin

          Economic

          Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (also known as "GSEs") have released their November reports on their mortgage portfolios and mortgage delinquencies. Both Fannie and Freddie report that serious delinquencies in multifamily are rising to multiyear highs.

          For November, seriously delinquent multifamily mortgages (90+ days delinquent) at Fannie Mae rose to 0.75 percent. That's up from October's total of 0.71 percent, and it was up from November 2024's total of 0.60 percent. Fannie's delinquency rate has risen quickly since December 2022 when the rate was 0.24 percent. Excluding the covid panic, Fannie's delinquency rate is now the highest since 2010, but remains below the Great-Recession high of 0.80 percent.

          Freddie Mac's delinquency report, on the other hand, shows delinquencies above the Great-Recession peak. During November, Freddie reported multifamily serious delinquency rate was 0.48 percent. That's unchanged from October 2025, but up from November 2024's level of 0.41 percent.

          Comparing for November of each year, November 2025's delinquency rate at Fannie exceeds that of November 2011, the previous peak year for delinquencies (ex covid), when November delinquencies reached 0.72 percent. At Freddie, November 2025's delinquency rate of .48 percent is the highest in decades, and above the previous peak of 0.39 percent.

          This trend likely reflects slowing rent growth and waning demand for rentals as employment stagnates and wage growth slows. CNBC reported on Dec 26:

          After years of steep increases, renters are finally seeing sustained price relief, a trend that appears to be carrying into early 2026.

          In November, the median asking rent across the 50 largest U.S. metro areas was $1,693, down about 1% from a year earlier and marking the 28th consecutive month of year-over-year declines, according to Realtor.com listings data. Nationally, the median rent fell to $1,367, down 1.1% from a year earlier, according to Apartment List's data.

          November is typically the slowest month for rentals, but rents fell more from October to November this year than they did over the same period last year, according to Apartment List.

          With new apartment supply still hitting the market, rents are expected to remain lower into 2026.

          "Barring a major economic shock, 2026 is shaping up to be one of the more renter-friendly periods we've seen in a decade," says Michelle Griffith, a luxury real estate broker at Douglas Elliman.

          The phrase "renter friendly" is anything but friendly for owners of multifamily rentals. Moreover, landlords must continue to contend with rising prices in services and materials necessary for regular maintenance of multifamily units. In other words, we must consider inflation, so real, inflation-adjusted rent growth is even worse than the nominal declines now reported in a number of metro areas. In Denver metro, for example, the median asking rent in November was down 4.8 percent, year over year.

          Source: Zero Hedge

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2026 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Personal Information Protection Statement
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          Connect Broker
          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com