Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



U.K. Input PPI MoM (Not SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
U.K. Core CPI MoM (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Retail Prices Index MoM (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Input PPI YoY (Not SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. CPI YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Output PPI MoM (Not SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Output PPI YoY (Not SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Core Retail Prices Index YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Core CPI YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Retail Prices Index YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Indonesia 7-Day Reverse Repo RateA:--
F: --
P: --
Indonesia Loan Growth YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
Indonesia Deposit Facility Rate (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Indonesia Lending Facility Rate (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
South Africa Core CPI YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
South Africa CPI YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
IEA Oil Market Report
U.K. CBI Industrial Output Expectations (Jan)A:--
F: --
U.K. CBI Industrial Prices Expectations (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
South Africa Retail Sales YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. CBI Industrial Trends - Orders (Jan)A:--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Retail Sales MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. MBA Mortgage Application Activity Index WoWA:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Industrial Product Price Index YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
Canada Industrial Product Price Index MoM (Dec)A:--
F: --
U.S. Weekly Redbook Index YoYA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Pending Home Sales Index YoY (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Pending Home Sales Index MoM (SA) (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Construction Spending MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
U.S. Pending Home Sales Index (Dec)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Refined Oil Stocks--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Gasoline Stocks--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Cushing Crude Oil Stocks--
F: --
P: --
U.S. API Weekly Crude Oil Stocks--
F: --
P: --
South Korea GDP Prelim YoY (SA) (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
South Korea GDP Prelim QoQ (SA) (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Imports YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Exports YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Goods Trade Balance (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Trade Balance (Not SA) (Dec)--
F: --
Australia Employment (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Australia Labor Force Participation Rate (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Australia Unemployment Rate (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Australia Full-time Employment (SA) (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Turkey Consumer Confidence Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Turkey Capacity Utilization (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Turkey Late Liquidity Window Rate (LON) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Turkey Overnight Lending Rate (O/N) (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
Turkey 1-Week Repo Rate--
F: --
P: --
U.K. CBI Distributive Trades (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. CBI Retail Sales Expectations Index (Jan)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Continued Jobless Claims (SA)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Initial Jobless Claims 4-Week Avg. (SA)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Real Personal Consumption Expenditures Final QoQ (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
Canada New Housing Price Index MoM (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Initial Jobless Claims (SA)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Real GDP Annualized QoQ Final (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index Final QoQ (AR) (Q3)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Outlays MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --














































No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
IEA warns of a significant oil surplus in Q1 2026, potentially easing prices despite geopolitical tensions.

The global oil market is heading for a major supply surplus in the first quarter of 2026, according to a new report from the International Energy Agency (IEA). The influential body, which advises industrialized nations, warns that excess supply is already large enough to offset the geopolitical risks currently pressuring the market.
In its latest monthly oil report, the IEA projected that global oil supply would outpace demand by a staggering 4.25 million barrels per day (bpd) in the first quarter. A surplus of this magnitude represents about 4% of total world demand and is larger than many other forecasts.
Despite the underlying supply glut, oil prices have climbed approximately 6% since the start of the year. This rise has been fueled by market concerns over potential disruptions. Global benchmark Brent crude was trading at $65.02 as of 11:42 GMT on Wednesday.
Recent geopolitical events contributing to market anxiety include:
• Venezuela: The U.S. captured President Nicolas Maduro early in the month and encouraged oil companies to invest in the country. However, short-term supplies have been disrupted, with a U.S. blockade lowering exports by 580,000 bpd from December to early January.
• Iran: The threat of possible U.S. strikes has raised concerns about reduced supplies from the region.
• Kazakhstan: A combination of drone attacks and technical problems has curtailed the country's output.
Even with these flashpoints, the IEA notes that the market's oversupply provides a significant buffer. "Barring any significant disruptions to supplies in Iran, Venezuela, or further cuts from other producers, a significant surplus is likely to re-emerge in the first quarter of 2026," the agency stated. "For now, bloated balances provide some comfort to market participants and have kept prices in check."
The rapid increase in global oil supply stems from two primary sources. The OPEC+ alliance, comprising the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, Russia, and other allies, began increasing its output in April 2025 following years of production cuts.
Simultaneously, production has ramped up in countries outside the alliance, particularly the United States, Guyana, and Brazil. While OPEC+ has decided to pause its output hikes for the first quarter of 2026, the market is still contending with the earlier increases.
For the full year of 2026, the IEA now forecasts an implied market surplus of 3.69 million bpd. This is a slight downward revision from the 3.84 million bpd surplus projected in its previous report.
A key factor in this adjustment is a modest upgrade to the global oil demand forecast. The IEA raised its demand growth prediction by 70,000 bpd to 930,000 bpd for the year. The agency attributes this to a normalization of economic conditions following last year's tariff turmoil and oil prices that are lower than a year ago.
The IEA’s forecast of a deep surplus is not universally shared. Rival forecaster OPEC holds a more optimistic view on demand, predicting oil consumption will rise by a much stronger 1.38 million bpd this year. Based on OPEC's figures, the market in 2026 appears to be nearly balanced between supply and demand, a stark contrast to the IEA's glut scenario.
The IEA projects the surplus will be most pronounced in the first quarter, partly due to seasonal factors. Global oil refiners typically schedule maintenance shutdowns during this period, which temporarily reduces crude demand. "With seasonal refinery maintenance about to commence, reducing demand for crude, further reductions in crude production will be needed," the Paris-based agency concluded.
On the supply side, the IEA revised its global growth forecast for the year upward to 2.5 million bpd. Crucially, it projects that around 52% of this new supply growth will come from producers outside the OPEC+ alliance.
The Japanese yen is gaining ground against major currencies as traders position themselves for the Bank of Japan's (BoJ) next move. Market focus is locked on the conclusion of the central bank's two-day policy meeting this Friday, which is expected to provide critical clues about the timing of its next interest rate hike.
Several dynamics are contributing to the yen's upward momentum. Anticipation is building that Japanese authorities may intervene to halt further depreciation of the currency. This sentiment, combined with a broader risk-off mood in the markets, enhances the appeal of the safe-haven JPY.
Further bolstering this view were recent comments from Japan's finance minister, Satsuki Katayama, who suggested that Japan and the U.S. could cooperate to address the yen's recent weakness. The possibility of additional policy tightening by the BoJ is also seen as a significant supportive factor for the currency.
The yen's rally comes amid wider market uncertainty. European stocks traded lower, with investors unnerved by ongoing trade jitters linked to Greenland.
Meanwhile, the "Sell America" trade appears to be taking a pause, and the euro is holding firm near recent highs. Market participants are also looking ahead to speeches by U.S. President Donald Trump and ECB President Christine Lagarde at the Davos summit.
During European trading, the yen demonstrated notable strength across the board:
• Against the Euro (EUR/JPY): The yen rose to 184.82 from a one-week low of 185.54. The next resistance level is seen around 183.00.
• Against the Pound (GBP/JPY): The yen advanced to 211.97 from an early low of 212.65, with potential resistance near 210.00.
• Against the Swiss Franc (CHF/JPY): The currency climbed to 199.26 from 200.31. The next key level to watch is the 197.00 resistance area.
• Against the U.S. Dollar (USD/JPY): The yen strengthened to 157.82 from 158.28. Resistance is anticipated around the 156.00 mark.
• Against the Canadian Dollar (CAD/JPY): The yen moved to 114.09 from 114.39, with the next resistance target at 112.00.
Traders will be closely monitoring a series of economic data releases during the New York session. Key reports include:
• U.S. MBA mortgage approvals data
• Canada's Producer Price Index (PPI) and raw material prices for December
• U.S. pending home sales for December
• U.S. construction spending for September
President Donald Trump is set to significantly increase his domestic travel in the lead-up to the November midterm elections, aiming to promote his economic policies and win over American voters concerned about the cost of living.
White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles confirmed the new strategy, telling reporters that Trump plans to travel "every week" and will intensify this schedule as the elections draw closer. The goal is to secure control of Congress by directly addressing economic anxieties.
As part of a coordinated White House effort, Cabinet members will also scale back international trips to concentrate on domestic stops. This initiative is designed to amplify the administration's economic message at a time when affordability is a primary concern for voters.
The renewed travel plan includes a trip to Iowa on Tuesday, a state pivotal to Trump's political rise, where he will discuss the farm economy and energy. This follows a recent visit to a Ford Motor Co. facility in Michigan, where he promoted his tariff agenda and efforts to boost domestic manufacturing.
While the administration has previously announced plans for more travel, this new push signals a campaign-level intensity that has not yet fully materialized.
The travel announcement came shortly before Trump was scheduled to deliver a major speech on affordability at the World Economic Forum in Davos. His populist platform includes several key proposals designed to address rising costs for Americans.
According to National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, the president's agenda features several bold initiatives:
• Housing: A ban on institutional investors purchasing single-family homes.
• Credit: A temporary cap on credit card interest rates at 10% for one year.
• Mortgages: Directing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy $200 billion in mortgage bonds to help lower lending rates.
• Retirement Savings: Allowing Americans to use funds from their 401(k) retirement plans for a down payment on a home.
On Tuesday, Trump signed an executive order outlining a process to limit institutional home purchases, though it did not immediately implement new regulations.
The administration is ramping up its focus on the cost of living as high prices for groceries, housing, and healthcare continue to strain household budgets. Republicans are under pressure to maintain their narrow majority in Congress. A loss in either the House or the Senate could jeopardize Trump's legislative agenda and expose him to greater oversight.
This economic messaging has been inconsistent in the past. Trump previously dismissed affordability concerns as a Democratic "hoax" before later insisting that his economic record was strong and that his policies simply needed more time to work. The upcoming travel blitz represents a clear effort to unify this message and present a proactive stance on the economy ahead of the crucial November elections.
The European Union's historic free trade agreement with the South American Mercosur bloc is now facing a serious threat. After 25 years of negotiations, EU lawmakers have narrowly voted to challenge the deal in the bloc's highest court, a move that could stall its implementation by at least two years and potentially unravel it completely.
On Wednesday, a motion to refer the trade pact to the EU Court of Justice passed with 334 votes in favor to 324 against, with 11 abstentions. The challenge was initiated by a group of 144 lawmakers who have raised critical questions about the agreement's legal standing.
Specifically, the court will be asked to rule on two key issues:
• Can the deal be provisionally applied before it is fully ratified by every EU member state?
• Do its provisions unfairly restrict the EU's power to set its own environmental and consumer health policies?
A ruling from the court typically takes around two years.
The vote exposes a deep rift within the EU over the trade deal, which was signed on Saturday with Mercosur members Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay.
Opposition From the Agricultural Sector
Opponents, with France's powerful farming lobby at the forefront, argue the deal will flood the European market with cheap agricultural imports. They are primarily concerned about increased competition from beef, sugar, and poultry, which they say will undercut domestic producers who have already staged multiple protests against the pact.



The Geopolitical Argument for the Deal
On the other side, supporters like Germany and Spain view the agreement as a crucial strategic move. They argue that amid global trade disruptions, such as U.S. tariffs implemented under President Donald Trump, the deal is essential for the EU's economic security.
Proponents believe the pact will:
• Offset business lost due to U.S. trade policies.
• Reduce the EU's economic reliance on China.
• Secure access to critical minerals from South America.
They also warn that the Mercosur nations are growing impatient after decades of talks, and further delays could jeopardize the entire relationship.
While the legal challenge proceeds, the EU could technically apply the trade agreement on a provisional basis. However, this would be a politically difficult move given the strong opposition and the risk of a public backlash.
Ultimately, the European Parliament still holds the power to annul the deal later on. With the pact now heading to the courts, the future of the EU's largest-ever trade agreement remains highly uncertain.
Swiss National Bank Chairman Martin Schlegel on Wednesday stressed that central bank independence is essential for controlling inflation, a statement made amid mounting political pressure on the U.S. Federal Reserve and its chair, Jerome Powell.
The SNB joined other central banks last week in supporting Powell after the U.S. Justice Department, under President Donald Trump, threatened him with a criminal investigation. Powell has described the probe, which concerns renovations at two Fed buildings, as a pretext to pressure the central bank into cutting interest rates—a move Trump has repeatedly demanded.
"Central bank independence is very important," Schlegel told Reuters during the World Economic Forum in Davos. "A central bank needs to be independent to fulfil its mandate, which is price stability."
He highlighted the global significance of the Fed's autonomy, adding, "It's really important that the Fed is independent. Typically, when a central bank is not independent, inflation is higher."
Schlegel noted that recent global political turbulence has driven up the value of the Swiss franc, which investors traditionally view as a safe-haven asset.
The franc recorded its strongest annual performance since 2002 last year, gaining nearly 14.5% against the dollar as President Trump's global tariff offensive disrupted trade and unsettled investors. Renewed fears of a trade war with Europe have fueled further gains, with the franc climbing 1.4% this week after remaining stable for most of January.
The franc's appreciation directly impacts the SNB's balance sheet, reducing the value of its dollar-denominated assets. U.S. dollar holdings constitute approximately 36% of the central bank's 765 billion Swiss francs ($966 billion) in foreign currency reserves.
While Schlegel did not comment on whether the SNB would reduce its dollar holdings, he emphasized that the bank's strategy is built on diversification and liquidity.
"What's important for us is diversification, with currencies, so U.S. dollars, euro, and so on, but also in other instruments, government bonds, corporate bonds, and also equities," he explained. "We are looking at our investment universe constantly, and we are able to make decisions if necessary."
Despite a 36.3-billion-franc profit from its gold holdings last year, driven by investors seeking refuge from economic turmoil, Schlegel confirmed the SNB has no intention of altering its position.
"We have no plan to buy or sell gold," he stated, referring to the bank's 1,040 metric tons of reserves.
The SNB also remains unconcerned by recent low inflation figures. Switzerland's annual inflation rate was 0.1% in December, sitting at the bottom of the bank's 0%-2% target range. Schlegel said the SNB expects inflation to rise but is prepared for some months of negative inflation.
"If we have some negative prints this year, for example, this is not a problem with the Swiss National Bank," he said, "because we look at the medium-term price stability."
($1 = 0.7917 Swiss francs)
Economists have hit the brakes on their rate cut predictions for the U.S. Federal Reserve. A new Reuters poll indicates a significant shift in expectations, with a majority now forecasting that the central bank will hold its key interest rate steady through the first quarter.
Just a month ago, most experts anticipated at least one rate reduction by March. Now, the consensus suggests that any policy easing is unlikely until Fed Chair Jerome Powell's term concludes in May. This pivot is driven by a surprisingly resilient U.S. economy and escalating political pressures on the central bank's independence.

The January 16-21 poll of 100 economists shows a unified front for the short term. Every respondent expects the Fed to keep rates in the 3.50%-3.75% range at its upcoming meeting on January 27-28.
Furthermore, 58% of those surveyed foresee no change for the entire quarter. This marks a stark reversal from the previous month's poll, where a rate cut was the prevailing view.
Looking beyond the first quarter, the outlook remains uncertain. However, a slight majority of 55 economists believe rate cuts could resume once Powell's tenure ends in May, highlighting the critical role of the Fed's future leadership in shaping monetary policy.
Jeremy Schwartz, a senior U.S. economist at Nomura, noted the complexity of the situation. "The economic outlook on the surface suggests the Fed should remain on hold, maybe even consider putting hikes on the table sometime later this year or next year," he said. "In reality, though, we think the Fed will remain on hold for the remainder of Powell's term through May, but we suspect the new leadership will likely manage to get another 50 basis points of rate cuts later in the year."
The Fed's policy path is complicated by mounting political interference. President Donald Trump has consistently criticized Chair Powell for not cutting rates more aggressively.
These tensions have intensified recently, with the Justice Department bringing criminal charges against Powell concerning renovations at the Fed's headquarters. Concurrently, an attempt by Trump to remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook is awaiting a Supreme Court hearing.
This contentious environment is expected to impact the selection of the next Fed chair, a decision Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested could come as early as next week.
"There's going to be more pushback than ever on the selection of the next chair, all because of the criminal investigation," said Bernard Yaros, lead U.S. economist at Oxford Economics. "I don't expect Trump to be able to really fill the Fed with people who will cut interest rates."
Underlying the delayed rate-cut expectations is the sheer strength of the U.S. economy. After expanding at a robust 4.3% pace in the third quarter, growth is now projected to hit 2.3% this year, an upgrade from the 2.0% predicted last month. This forecast is well above the 1.8% level the Fed considers non-inflationary.
Economists at Oxford Economics are even more bullish, forecasting 2.8% growth in 2026. "We are looking for a very strong U.S. GDP growth in 2026 due to further investments in AI, but even more because of the tax cuts under the fiscal bill," Yaros explained. He estimates the bill will add six-tenths of a percentage point to annual GDP growth this year alone.
This sustained economic momentum reduces the urgency for the Fed to stimulate activity with lower interest rates.
A consequence of strong economic growth is that inflation is likely to remain elevated. According to the poll, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index—the Fed's preferred inflation gauge—is expected to stay above the 2% target for the rest of this year and through 2028.
Meanwhile, the labor market remains stable, with the unemployment rate projected to average 4.5% this year. With solid growth, a tight job market, and persistent inflation, the economic argument for holding interest rates steady appears compelling.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features

FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up