High Frequency Firms See India Profits Surge Despite Regulatory Curbs

Forex

Stocks

Summary:

High-frequency trading firms have posted strong profit growth in India despite regulatory curbs, showcasing their agility in tapping opportunities across the country's $5.4 trillion equity market.

Hudson River Trading LLC led the charge with a 156% surge in profit for the fiscal year that ended on March 31, according to filings. Optiver Holding BV and homegrown firms AlphaGrep Securities Pvt and Graviton Research Capital LLP also reported robust growth for the year.

The performance highlights India's growing appeal for market makers even as the Securities and Exchange Board of India tightens rules to temper retail speculation in derivatives. At the same time, regulators have taken steps to strengthen cash markets, expand ETFs, and deepen commodity derivatives.

The fiscal year for these firms ended about five months after SEBI started imposing curbs on derivatives trading by limiting the number of weekly contracts to one index per exchange, charging upfront for options premiums, and increasing the contract size. The regulator also imposed a temporary ban on Jane Street Group in July, accusing it of manipulative transactions involving options and shares — allegations that the firm has denied.

Jane Street and Citadel Securities LLC have yet to report their figures.

Even with the curbs, futures and options trading "has been the largest segment for HFT firms given the large volumes," said Sanchit Suneja, chief strategy officer at India's Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd. He added that algorithmic trading accounts for more than 50% of the total trading volume in the equity derivatives segment by value on the National Stock Exchange.

Hudson River reported a profit of about 22 billion rupees ($246 million), while its revenue from operations jumped 155% to 31.4 billion rupees, according to a filing to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

Graviton, a significant player in cash equities, reported a 17% rise in profit to nearly 12 billion rupees. AlphaGrep saw its profit jump 77% to 4.74 billion rupees. Dutch firm Optiver reported a $44 million profit in its first full year in India, reversing losses in the first six months. The figures may not solely reflect income generated within India for the firms.

Algorithmic traders are also profiting from market making on exchange traded funds, and cash-to-futures arbitrage, Suneja said. Proprietary traders accounted for about 50% of the options turnover in the latest fiscal year, about 30% of cash equity trading and roughly 35% of futures, he said.

Meanwhile, HFT firms are also adapting and looking into multi-frequency strategies. Companies are also diversifying into other segments, while smaller retail investors are moving away from derivatives.

"There is a churn in users," Ishan Bansal, the chief financial officer of digital broker Groww, said on an earnings call on Friday.

The firm said a 10% to 20% growth in average order value per user in the derivatives segment over the last few quarters, Bansal added. That's because smaller participants are moving away from the futures and options segment, he said.

Source: Bloomberg Europe

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Strategic Capital Rotation Toward China’s AI Ecosystem

As global enthusiasm for artificial intelligence continues to reshape equity markets, fund managers are becoming more selective in their exposure. One of Asia’s top-performing fund managers, Kelly Chung of Value Partners, has begun rotating out of South Korean and Taiwanese equities into Chinese AI stocks, particularly hyperscalers listed in Hong Kong. This strategic pivot is based on a comparative advantage in valuations and the long-term growth potential of China’s underdeveloped AI infrastructure investment.

Chung oversees the Value Partners Asian Income Fund and the Asian Innovation Opportunities Fund, which jointly manage $490 million and have each outperformed 98% of peers over the past year. She emphasizes that while Chinese firms currently lag behind U.S. counterparts in AI capital expenditure, their investment trajectory still has substantial room for growth. As China increases AI infrastructure spending, related stocks are likely to appreciate in value, especially since their current market prices remain relatively subdued.

Contrasting Market Movements and Valuation Metrics

The divergence in market momentum across Asia has become stark. South Korea’s Kospi index, driven heavily by technology firms like SK Hynix (a major Nvidia supplier), has surged 21% in three months, with SK Hynix shares more than doubling. Taiwan’s benchmark has risen 9.2% during the same period. However, the Hang Seng Tech Index home to China’s top AI and cloud companies has declined 4.8%, signaling a potential valuation disconnect that Chung’s funds aim to exploit.

Valuation multiples underline this relative underpricing. The Hang Seng Tech Index trades at approximately 18 times forward earnings, significantly below the Nasdaq-100’s 21 times. According to Goldman Sachs, Chinese cloud providers are projected to increase investments by 20% next year a bullish signal yet this still represents only about 10% of the investment scale of U.S. peers, underscoring the gap in growth stage rather than saturation.

Rethinking AI Exposure: Risk Management and Profit-Taking

The broader market concern revolves around the sustainability of AI-driven rallies. The initial euphoria has inflated valuations for several top players, and with earnings not yet catching up in some cases, investor sentiment is shifting toward defensive positioning. Chung's decision to rotate toward lower-valuation names in China reflects a desire to position for the next wave of AI expansion while insulating the portfolio from potential corrections in overheated markets.

She notes that earnings upgrades in Korea and Taiwan have indeed occurred, but the recent rallies in these regions appear primarily valuation-driven rather than earnings-led. This distinction implies that the recent upward momentum may not be sustainable, increasing the risk of profit-taking as markets digest the gains from 2025's AI bull run.

Outlook and Implications

The shift by funds like Value Partners suggests that investors are becoming more valuation-conscious and regionally diversified in their AI bets. China's AI ecosystem though lagging in absolute investment volume presents a compelling asymmetric opportunity, where upside potential may outweigh short-term risks due to favorable entry points and long-term policy support.

The move also indicates a subtle sentiment shift within Asian capital markets: investors are beginning to question the durability of tech rallies in Korea and Taiwan, especially if growth moderation sets in. Meanwhile, China’s lower base of AI infrastructure and continued support from domestic cloud service giants could offer both resilience and upside in the next investment cycle.

As the AI boom matures, fund managers like Kelly Chung are refining their exposure strategies to emphasize value and future scalability. China’s underappreciated AI stocks now present a promising frontier, especially compared to pricier markets like Korea and Taiwan. This pivot not only highlights a nuanced response to market valuations but also illustrates how long-term AI narratives continue to shape capital flows across Asia.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Political

Legislative Shift Spurs Renewed Legal Efforts

The U.S. Department of Justice has reignited its campaign to release sealed grand jury materials from the high-profile criminal cases involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. This latest initiative follows the passage of a new bipartisan law mandating broader transparency regarding Epstein-related documents. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi submitted formal requests to federal judges in New York and Florida, reversing the administration’s earlier posture that resisted disclosure.

President Donald Trump, after months of resistance, signed the legislation earlier this month. The law requires the DOJ to release a sweeping set of Epstein-related documents, including grand jury transcripts, flight logs, immunity agreements, travel data, and internal communications, as well as all materials connected to Epstein’s death in custody. The move marks a significant departure from the administration’s summer stance, which saw criticism over its perceived retreat from public transparency.

Legal Barriers and Judicial Skepticism

Despite the new law, the path to releasing grand jury materials remains fraught with legal complexity. Grand jury proceedings are protected by longstanding confidentiality rules intended to preserve the integrity of investigations and the privacy of individuals. Judges previously denied similar DOJ requests in August, suggesting that the focus on sealed grand jury evidence could distract from the far larger cache of non-sealed documents already in DOJ control.

U.S. District Judge Richard Berman, who presided over the Epstein case in Manhattan, emphasized that the Justice Department itself holds the majority of actionable information and should focus on that instead. Likewise, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer, ruling on Maxwell’s case, dismissed the notion that the sealed grand jury material contained previously unreleased bombshells, noting bluntly, “There is no ‘there’ there.”

This reinforces a causal clarification that unsealing the grand jury evidence may not yield meaningful new insights, while distracting from the DOJ’s obligation to release existing non-sealed files.

Victim Notification Requirements Add New Layer

In a late development on Monday, Judge Engelmayer ordered the government to notify victims about its renewed motion to unseal grand jury materials in Maxwell’s case. Victims have until December 3 to submit their views, while Maxwell and the government must file their positions by December 10. This requirement underscores the legal procedural obligations embedded in transparency efforts and raises the potential for pushback from those directly affected by the materials’ release.

This judicial move also suggests a cause-and-effect dynamic wherein bypassing victim consultation could delay or derail the DOJ’s request, highlighting the importance of procedural legitimacy in controversial disclosures.

Political Undertones and Public Trust

While the legal maneuvering continues, political motivations remain under scrutiny. The timing of Trump’s legislative reversal just months after attempting to block such disclosures has prompted speculation that the unsealing effort may serve a broader political narrative. Previous judicial commentary implied that the focus on sealed records might be aimed at managing public perception rather than releasing meaningful evidence.

This tension between policy-driven transparency and political theatrics is further complicated by public pressure, the legacy of Epstein’s abuse network, and a justice system often criticized for shielding powerful individuals.

The DOJ’s renewed push to unseal grand jury documents in the Epstein-Maxwell cases reflects both a shift in legislative momentum and an ongoing legal tug-of-war over transparency, privacy, and institutional credibility. Whether these materials will offer new revelations or simply fulfill a symbolic function remains uncertain. But as court deadlines approach and victims’ voices are formally invited into the process, the battle over Epstein’s secrets is far from over and public demand for accountability remains as potent as ever.

Source: Bloomberg

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

US-China Truce Overshadowed by Taiwan Tensions

Following a trade truce in October, President Trump and President Xi Jinping held their first official phone call, with discussions touching on bilateral trade, Taiwan, and an upcoming visit to Beijing. While Trump portrayed the call as constructive, Chinese state readouts prioritized sovereignty over Taiwan and warned against Japanese military rhetoric. Beijing’s reaction included suspending imports and cultural exchanges with Japan. This development risks derailing the fragile trade détente, revealing that the truce may only be temporary if geopolitical tensions continue escalating.

This reflects a potential causal relationship between geopolitical instability and trade uncertainty. The growing tension over Taiwan, particularly amid US-Japan cooperation, could directly reignite tariff disputes and disrupt the truce’s implementation.

Legal Jeopardy for Tariffs as SCOTUS Prepares Ruling

Back home, Trump’s tariffs are legally vulnerable. The Supreme Court is reviewing whether the president exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Anticipating a loss, the White House has quietly prepared contingency plans using other legal frameworks like Sections 301 and 122 of the Trade Act. However, these alternatives are less powerful and face their own legal risks. The administration's preparation reveals a causal expectation that the court’s decision could undermine the current tariff regime and force a swift strategic pivot.

Trump continues to insist that revenue from tariffs will “skyrocket,” but the Congressional Budget Office has revised its estimates, lowering the projected deficit reduction from $4 trillion to $3 trillion. The reduction stems from both recent tariff rollbacks and diminished actual collection, signaling that economic assumptions did not match real-world behavior, a correlation that undermines Trump’s fiscal justifications.

EU Rejects US Demands Amid Trade Stalemate

Tensions with the European Union remain unresolved. Despite earlier frameworks signed in July, the EU has resisted US demands to weaken its digital regulations in exchange for tariff relief on steel and aluminum. The bloc insists its digital policies are non-negotiable and meant to protect consumers rather than target American firms. This refusal signals a cause-effect disconnection: the US is trying to tie unrelated trade and regulatory issues, while the EU views them as separate domains.

While both sides initially agreed to reduce tariffs (including a 15% levy on many goods and mutual removal of some agricultural barriers), implementation has stalled. US officials claim Europe is slow to act, while the EU criticizes Washington for expanding the 50% steel tariff to over 400 EU products. This mutual blame suggests reciprocal causality where distrust and partial compliance from both parties are reinforcing the deadlock.

Brazil Scores Victory, Food Prices Ease

In a rare reversal, Trump rescinded the 40% tariff on Brazilian food products ranging from beef to coffee following domestic backlash over soaring food prices. This decision comes as inflation remains a key voter concern, especially after Democrats gained ground in recent elections. The tariff cut led to a significant drop in global coffee prices (arabica futures fell 4.6%, robusta down 5%), showing a direct causal link between tariff decisions and commodity markets.

Brazilian President Lula da Silva celebrated the exemption as a strategic win, having maintained pressure without concessions. This episode illustrates how persistent diplomatic resistance, combined with economic pressure from US consumers, can force policy shifts even under a protectionist administration.

India, Russia, and Global Realignments

Following intensified US sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil, Indian refiners are being offered steep discounts on Russian Urals crude up to $7 below Brent though most are wary of new shipments. Concurrently, Reliance Industries has stopped processing Russian oil at one major refinery to comply with sanctions. These developments expose a causal sequence where sanctions disrupt traditional energy flows, prompting market realignments and strategic repositioning by key players like India.

At the G20 summit, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney publicly declared that the world economy can progress without US participation, a clear rebuke of Trump’s trade agenda. By pursuing stronger ties with China, India, and South Africa, Canada is signaling a strategic decoupling, a correlational shift in geopolitical alignments accelerated by American unilateralism.

The Tariff Dividend and Its Political Mirage

Trump has floated the idea of distributing $2,000 "tariff dividend" checks to American households, but experts argue the math doesn’t add up. Economists point out that the revenue collected is insufficient and that the policy might add more to the deficit than it reduces. This proposal is more political than fiscal, aiming to soothe voter frustrations, but it risks deepening economic distortion highlighting a mismatch between fiscal projection and political promise.

Tariffs are also stifling sectors like tech and wine. Nvidia’s sales to China underperformed due to tightened export controls and geopolitical tension, reducing China’s share of its quarterly revenue to 5% from a previous 13%. Meanwhile, US wine importers report rising prices and shrinking selection due to tariffs and regulatory burdens, contributing to a 13% drop in wine sales year-on-year.

Trump’s tariff strategy, once touted as a cornerstone of his economic nationalism, is now caught in a crossfire of legal scrutiny, international backlash, and domestic price pressure. While short-term concessions like tariff relief for Brazil offer temporary reprieve, the broader trajectory suggests growing resistance abroad and mounting costs at home. The global trade landscape is shifting, and the US risks being left behind unless it recalibrates its approach to balance strategic interests with economic pragmatism.

Source: Yahoo Finance

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

MarketPulse by OANDA Group

Cryptocurrency

Forex

The relentless crypto bloodbath appears to have finally stalled, and signs suggest the market may have already posted a definitive bottom.

Bearish acceleration had driven prices to stark troughs, with Bitcoin grazing the $80,000 level and altcoins suffering even steeper declines. XRP plunged below $2.00, Ethereum tested levels near $2,800, and Solana dropped to trade near $125.

However, as key technical areas and Fibonacci retracements triggered interest from both opportunistic investors and algorithms, dip-buying has brought the Crypto Market higher to start the week. Bitcoin is now testing the $88,000 level, while Ethereum is climbing back towards the $3,000 psychological level.

Crypto Bloodbath Stalls: Is A Bottom In?_1

ETF Inflows and Outflows in 2025 – Source: Coinglass

Crucially, institutional flows are signaling a shift. Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs are seeing their first renewed inflows after a painful 6-week streak of net outflows that reflected general deleveraging across digital assets.

The Total Market Cap, which posted lows around $2.74T just last Friday, is also staging a recovery.

Buoyed by a broadly more positive mood in markets—fueled by a dovish repricing for the Fed's December meeting, strong beats on Nvidia earnings, and potential trade reopening talks with China—the total valuation is once again breaking back above the pivotal $3T mark.

This level will be extremely important to hold as it equates to the 2021 Bull Market peak.

Screenshot 2025-11-24 at 2.28.05 PM

Crypto Bloodbath Stalls: Is A Bottom In?_2

Crypto Total Market Cap – Bouncing at the lows of its Channel. November 24, 2025 – Source: TradingView

The Picture is Green after many Red days

Crypto Bloodbath Stalls: Is A Bottom In?_3

Daily overview of the Crypto Market (14:30 ET), November 24, 2025 – Source: Finviz

Bitcoin and Ethereum 2-timeframe Analysis

Bitcoin Weekly Chart

Crypto Bloodbath Stalls: Is A Bottom In?_4

Bitcoin (BTC) Weekly Chart, November 24, 2025 – Source: TradingView

A ruthless 37% descent for the pioneer Crypto has taken a break as multiple confluences of Technical Supports are coming through.

The 61.8% retracement of the entire move from the 2023 ($15,500!) lows has brought some interest, as this Fibonacci level tends to generate traction among Traders and Investors.

This also comes at an imperfect touch of the 2023 trendline, which presents one of the most important technical support on the long-run.

Breaking this line will let the $75,000 Liberation Day as an emergency lifeline but after that, there isn't much before the $60,000 Monthly Support.

Bitcoin Intraday (8H) Chart and Technical Levels

Crypto Bloodbath Stalls: Is A Bottom In?_5

Bitcoin (BTC) 8H Chart, November 24, 2025 – Source: TradingView

A Bullish divergence on the 8H Timeframe also helped the shorter-timeframe buyers to step in quite aggressively.

A precedingly downside-broken Bear Channel pointed to extreme fear which wasn't followed by momentum accumulation, which tends to create Bullish divergences on the RSI.

These are strong setups for mean-reversion, however not much says for how long things will rebound.

Therefore, keep an eye on the Channel lows for Short-term support (if it breaks, more bearish).On the other hand, holding the Channel after a fakeout could lead to a $102,000 higher bound test.

Levels of interest for BTC trading:

Support Levels:

· $90,000 to 93,000 major support turned Pivot

· Current Weekly Lows $89,340

· $85,000 mid-term Support (+/- $1,500)

· $75,000 Key long-term support

Resistance Levels:

· $90,000 to 93,000 major support turned Pivot

· $98,000 to $100,000 Main Support, now Pivot (MA 50 at $100,000)

· $102,000 Bear Channel Highs

· Resistance at previous ATH $106,000 to $108,000

· Current ATH Resistance $124,000 to $126,000

Ethereum (ETH) Weekly Chart

Crypto Bloodbath Stalls: Is A Bottom In?_6

Ethereum (ETH) Weekly Chart, November 24, 2025 – Source: TradingView

The $2,700 Level mentioned in our very recent ETH analysis was used as a trampoline for Buyers.

The next test will be to break and hold above $3,000, which also corresponds with the mid-lane of the Channel. Above this, breakout odds greatly increase.

Ethereum Intraday (8H) Chart and Technical Levels

Crypto Bloodbath Stalls: Is A Bottom In?_7

Ethereum (ETH) 8H Chart, November 24, 2025 – Source: TradingView

Levels of interest for ETH trading:

Support Levels:

· $2,500 to $2,700 June Key Support (recent rebound)

· $2,620 Session and weekly Lows

· $2,100 June War support

· $1,385 to $1,750 2025 Support

· 2025 Lows $1,384

Resistance Levels:

· $3,000 to $3,200 Major momentum Pivot (Test of the $3,000)

· $3,500 (+/- $50) Resistance and Descending Channel highs

· $3,800 September lows

· $4,000 to Dec 2024 top Higher timeframe Resistance zone

· $4,950 Current new All-time highs

Source: MarketPulse by OANDA Group

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Winkelmann

Stocks

Economic

Venezuela is tapping Chevron Corp. for supplies of a key feedstock after a US warship blocked the path of a Russian vessel near the country's coast, threatening to roil deliveries of the much-needed material.

The oil major can only load crude oil after it delivers a cargo of diluent naphtha — used to help oil flow in pipelines — to Venezuela, according to a person with knowledge of the situation.

The Chevron-booked ship Nave Neutrino, which was scheduled to load a parcel of crude oil at the Venezuelan government-controlled terminal of Jose, left the coast empty after two days, said two people, asking not to be named because the information is private. The vessel instead sailed to the US Virgin Islands, where it is loading naphtha for Venezuela. After discharging at Jose, it will be able to load crude, one of the people said.

Chevron, which regularly buys naphtha for its projects in Venezuela, didn't immediately return a message seeking comment. The Houston-based company has said in the past that its operations in the Latin American country comply with US laws and regulations.

The last-minute change came after the Russian vessel Seahorse, on its way to back to Venezuela from Cuba, hit the brakes when the US destroyer USS Stockdale crossed its path. The Seahorse made its way to the Venezuelan coast after the warship moved away, according to ship movements tracked by Bloomberg.

The rerouting of the Nave Neutrino underscores the challenges Venezuela has faced since the US beefed up its military presence in the region as part of a campaign to force leader Nicolas Maduro from office. Oil production, already severely constrained, now faces a new setback as dark-fleet ships reconsider approaching Venezuela's ports.

Supplies of naphtha are tight in Venezuela after an explosion at a oil facility that helps separate the material, according to a person with knowledge of the situation. The oil ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Source: Bloomberg Europe

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

ING

Commodity

Forex

Energy – Oil rises amid risk-on move, but peace talks are crucial

The oil market received a boost from a broader risk-on move, with equities rallying and the market pricing in a higher probability of the US Federal Reserve cutting interest rates on 10 December. As a result, ICE Brent settled almost 1.3% higher on the day. However, the market continues to pay close attention to how peace talks to end the war in Ukraine develop. Reports suggest that there have been significant changes to the proposed peace plan, with the US and Ukraine essentially drafting a new one. The more contentious points, such as those related to territory, will need to be ironed out by President Trump and President Zelensky. Obviously, Russia must agree on any deal. For oil markets, a deal could remove significant supply risk, leaving participants to focus on bearish supply fundamentals through 2026.

European gas prices came under further pressure yesterday, with the Title Transfer Facility (TTF) trading below EUR30/MWh to its lowest level since May 2024. Ukrainian peace talks weighed on prices somewhat, while weather forecasts for December suggest milder-than-usual temperatures after a recent cold spell. The colder weather in recent days has led to gas storage in the EU falling more rapidly. It's now 79% full, down from a 5-year average of 89%. The large investment fund gross short in the market still leaves plenty of positioning risk, particularly as we move deeper into winter. For now, funds seem to believe that the supply outlook is comfortable, with growing LNG supply.

Metals - Indonesian nickel plant cuts output

A majority Chinese-owned Indonesian nickel plant, QMB New Energy Materials, is cutting back production for at least two weeks because its tailings site is nearly full, according to Bloomberg. Indonesia accounts for around 60% of global nickel production. Its rapid expansion, driven by Chinese investment, is drawing increased local scrutiny. Much of this scrutiny comes from Indonesia's expanding High-Pressure Acid Leaching (HPAL) segment. The combination of intensive acid use, high waste volumes and complex tailings storage raised environmental concerns. This could influence future project approvals and add uncertainty to Indonesia's supply trajectory. Indonesia's nickel strategy relies heavily on the HPAL method, which converts vast reserves of low-grade laterite ore into battery-grade nickel—a critical material for the electric vehicle supply chain.

Nickel is the worst-performing metal on the LME this year. Prices are down more than 4% year-to-date, and the global market is heading for another year of surplus in 2026. However, supply risks do exist, as Indonesia moves to tighten control over its mining sector.

Agriculture– Cocoa prices edge lower

London cocoa came under further pressure yesterday, with the front-month contract falling below GBP3,700/t at one stage, and trading to its lowest level since January 2024. The weather in West Africa has been largely supportive for the crop recently. Meanwhile, robust cocoa arrivals at ports in the Ivory Coast signalled an improving supply outlook. Recent official numbers suggest that Ivorian bean arrivals at ports have topped 100,000 tons for three straight weeks. They are now near last year's pace after a slow start to the season that began in October.

According to the Brazilian Coffee Exporters Council (Cecafé), Brazilian coffee exporters might take at least six months to make up for the volumes they were unable to ship to the US amid steep tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. There are suggestions that Brazil has withheld about 1m bags from the US market since a 40% surcharge took effect in August. Between August and October, exports to the US dropped 51.5% to 983.97k bags. Last Friday, the White House announced it would lift the 40% tariff on Brazilian coffee.

Source: ING

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

High Frequency Firms See India Profits Surge Despite Regulatory Curbs

Source: Bloomberg Europe

China’s AI Upside Repositions Asia Fund Amid Valuation Concerns in Korea and Taiwan

Strategic Capital Rotation Toward China’s AI Ecosystem

Contrasting Market Movements and Valuation Metrics

Rethinking AI Exposure: Risk Management and Profit-Taking

Outlook and Implications

Source: Bloomberg

Justice Department Revives Push To Unseal Epstein-Maxwell Grand Jury Files Amid New Legal Mandate

Legislative Shift Spurs Renewed Legal Efforts

Legal Barriers and Judicial Skepticism

Victim Notification Requirements Add New Layer

Political Undertones and Public Trust

Source: Bloomberg

Trade Under Pressure: Trump’s Tariff Gambit Faces Global Pushback

US-China Truce Overshadowed by Taiwan Tensions

Legal Jeopardy for Tariffs as SCOTUS Prepares Ruling

EU Rejects US Demands Amid Trade Stalemate

Brazil Scores Victory, Food Prices Ease

India, Russia, and Global Realignments

The Tariff Dividend and Its Political Mirage

Source: Yahoo Finance

Crypto Bloodbath Stalls: Is A Bottom In?

ETF Inflows and Outflows in 2025 – Source: Coinglass

Screenshot 2025-11-24 at 2.28.05 PM

Crypto Total Market Cap – Bouncing at the lows of its Channel. November 24, 2025 – Source: TradingView

The Picture is Green after many Red days

Daily overview of the Crypto Market (14:30 ET), November 24, 2025 – Source: Finviz

Bitcoin and Ethereum 2-timeframe Analysis

Bitcoin (BTC) Weekly Chart, November 24, 2025 – Source: TradingView

Bitcoin Intraday (8H) Chart and Technical Levels

Bitcoin (BTC) 8H Chart, November 24, 2025 – Source: TradingView

Ethereum (ETH) Weekly Chart

Ethereum (ETH) Weekly Chart, November 24, 2025 – Source: TradingView

Ethereum Intraday (8H) Chart and Technical Levels

Ethereum (ETH) 8H Chart, November 24, 2025 – Source: TradingView

Source: MarketPulse by OANDA Group

Venezuela Taps Chevron For Feedstock After US Warship Scare

Source: Bloomberg Europe

Risk-on Trade Pushes Oil Higher

Energy – Oil rises amid risk-on move, but peace talks are crucial

Metals - Indonesian nickel plant cuts output

Agriculture– Cocoa prices edge lower

Source: ING

Risk Disclosure