France's Factory Output Slips, But Is a Rebound Coming?

The S&P 500 is navigating a complex landscape. The economic impact of President Trump's tariffs, combined with high stock market valuations and the uncertainty of midterm elections, could trigger a significant decline or even a crash in 2026. For investors, understanding these interconnected risks is crucial.

President Trump's trade policies, including tariffs, are a central factor in the economic outlook for 2026.

Trump's Tariffs: Economic Claims vs. Reality

In a January editorial for The Wall Street Journal, President Trump argued that his administration's tariffs have fueled "extraordinarily high economic growth." He also claimed that foreign exporters are footing the bill. However, a closer look at the data suggests a different narrative.

Deconstructing 2025 GDP Growth

The assertion of tariff-driven growth doesn't align with economic figures. Here’s a breakdown of the first nine months of 2025:

• Underwhelming Performance: Real GDP grew by 2.51%. This rate is actually below the 10-year average (2.75%), the 30-year average (2.58%), and the 50-year average (2.84%).

• The AI Factor: According to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, spending on artificial intelligence (AI) contributed 0.97 percentage points to GDP growth during this period. Without the boost from AI, the economy would have expanded by just 1.54%. Goldman Sachs noted that without AI, "U.S. GDP would have almost flatlined."

Who Really Pays for the Tariffs?

President Trump’s editorial also stated that foreign producers are absorbing "at least 80% of tariff costs," citing a Harvard Business School study. This appears to be a misinterpretation of the research.

The study he referenced explicitly concludes, "Our results suggest that U.S. consumers paid up to 43 percent of the tariff burden, with the rest absorbed by U.S. firms." The report does not suggest that foreign exporters paid a substantial portion of the tariffs.

The takeaway is clear: contrary to claims, GDP growth in 2025 was subpar and heavily propped up by AI investment, not tariffs.

Historical Headwinds for the Stock Market

Beyond the tariff debate, two historical patterns are signaling caution for the S&P 500 in 2026: elevated valuations and the midterm election cycle.

A Market Priced for Perfection

The S&P 500 currently trades at 22.2 times forward earnings, according to FactSet Research. This is a very expensive valuation from a historical perspective. In the last 40 years, the index has only sustained a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio above 22 during two periods: the dot-com bubble and the COVID-19 pandemic. Both were followed by bear markets.

This high valuation is particularly risky because the forward P/E metric already incorporates Wall Street's optimistic expectations for accelerated earnings in 2026. If companies fail to meet these high forecasts as tariffs weigh on the economy, stocks could fall sharply.

Midterm Election Year Jitters

History shows that midterm election years often bring market volatility. The S&P 500 has experienced a median intra-year drawdown of 19% in these years. This pattern suggests there is a 50/50 chance the index could see a similar decline in 2026.

This volatility stems from the uncertainty that midterm elections create. The party in power typically loses seats in Congress, leaving investors to speculate about future fiscal, trade, and regulatory policies.

The Bottom Line for Investors

The stock market faces a convergence of headwinds in 2026. The combination of high valuations, the economic drag from tariffs, and the historical uncertainty of a midterm election year raises the probability of a bear market or even a crash.

However, there is a silver lining for long-term investors. Every past market drawdown has ultimately proven to be a buying opportunity, and there is no reason to believe this time will be different.

An Inflation Hawk With A Pragmatic Voting Record

Crisis-Era Warnings And Inflation Expectations

Lessons From The 1970s And The Dual Mandate

A More Dovish Tone In Recent Years

Toward A More Rules-Based Federal Reserve

Independence Under Political Pressure

Source: Yahoo Finance

India's Trade Minister Piyush Goyal confirmed that a formal trade agreement with the United States is expected to be signed in March, a move that will see New Delhi reduce its tariffs on American goods.

Goyal laid out the first official timeline for the deal, which President Donald Trump first announced on Monday. A joint statement is expected within four to five days, which will trigger Washington to slash duties on Indian exports from 50% to 18%.

The agreement hinges on India halting its purchases of Russian oil and lowering existing trade barriers in exchange for more favorable tariff treatment from the U.S.

India's $500 Billion US Import Plan

A core component of the deal is a commitment from India to import at least $500 billion worth of American goods over the next five years. The purchases will focus on high-value sectors, including energy, aircraft, and computer chips.

Goyal specified that orders from planemaker Boeing alone could amount to between $70 billion and $80 billion. He added that the total value of these aircraft deals would likely "cross $100 billion" when factoring in the cost of engines.

Investors are bracing for Japan's election, but analysts suggest a surprising outcome: a landslide victory for the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) could be the best news for the country's turbulent bond and currency markets.

The vote has put markets on edge after fiscal worries recently triggered a sharp selloff in both the yen and Japanese government bonds (JGBs). This instability in Japan quickly spread, pushing up borrowing costs from the United States to Germany and reminding global markets of the high debt levels across major economies.

Why a Decisive Victory Could Calm Nerves

Paradoxically, an overwhelming LDP victory may ultimately benefit bonds and the yen. Analysts believe a strong mandate would free Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi from needing to negotiate with opposition parties, many of whom are demanding even deeper tax cuts and more aggressive government spending.

A comfortable majority would also give her more flexibility to respond to market pressure and adjust policies to prevent further yen weakness or a spike in borrowing costs—a pattern she has demonstrated in the past.

According to a recent poll, the LDP and its coalition partner Ishin could secure as many as 300 seats in the 465-seat lower house.

"I don't know if it's going to be a landslide, but certainly Takaichi finds herself in an advantageous situation," said Shoki Omori, chief Japan desk strategist at Mizuho Securities. "That's why she doesn't necessarily need to worry about further ramping up spending... Initially, I think the LDP and Takaichi were a little bit desperate, so to speak."

Takaichi's Policies and Market Turmoil

Since Takaichi—a fiscal dove and follower of former premier Shinzo Abe's "Abenomics"—won the LDP leadership in October, markets have been volatile. JGB yields have soared to all-time highs as bond prices have fallen.

Figure 1: Japanese Government Bond (JGB) yields rose sharply across all maturities under Prime Minister Takaichi, with the January 20 highs (red line) significantly above October 20 levels (blue line), reflecting growing fiscal concerns.

Meanwhile, the yen has fallen to a near 18-month low against the dollar. This has prompted Japanese policymakers to repeatedly threaten market intervention to defend the currency.

Voter Concerns and International Scrutiny

The rising cost of living is a central issue in this election, and voters have increasingly blamed the persistent weakness of the yen for driving up the price of imports. At the same time, rising bond yields translate into higher mortgage rates and increased borrowing costs for businesses, with any debt market rout risking a spillover into Japanese stocks.

The turmoil has also drawn international attention. The United States has criticized the volatility in Japanese markets for its spillover effects and has urged Tokyo to restore stability—a task that could be easier with a large parliamentary majority.

"Although the administration may initially aim to strengthen its proactive fiscal expansion, pressure from the markets and the U.S. administration would compel it to exercise restraint," wrote Barclays analysts led by Shinichiro Kadota. "The reduced need for cooperation with the opposition would also support this shift."

Takaichi has shown a willingness to bend to market pressure. Earlier this week, she walked back campaign comments perceived as favoring a weak yen. In November, she was forced to clarify her fiscal stance after a 21.3 trillion yen ($135.72 billion) stimulus package rattled the bond market.

How Fiscal Pledges Roiled the Bond Market

The so-called super-long bonds have been especially sensitive to any hint of loosened fiscal discipline in Japan, which is already the most indebted nation in the developed world.

On January 20, yields on 30-year bonds surged to a record 3.88% after Takaichi called the election and pledged a two-year suspension of the food tax. She did not specify how she would cover the estimated 10 trillion yen revenue shortfall, spooking investors.

Figure 2: The 30-year JGB yield surged to an all-time peak near 3.9% in late January after a snap election was called, highlighting the market's extreme sensitivity to fiscal policy announcements.

While that selloff could resume, Takaichi's fiscal proposals are starting to look conservative compared to those from the opposition.

A Look at the Opposition's Spending Plans

An analysis of campaign pledges reveals why a strong LDP mandate might lead to more fiscal restraint:

• Takaichi's LDP: Pledged to suspend the 8% food tax for two years.

• Centrist Reform Alliance: Wants to abolish the food tax entirely.

• Democratic Party for the People: Proposes slashing all value-added taxes to 5%.

This context suggests that if Takaichi secures a large majority, she may have the political cover to avoid implementing her most costly promises.

"What the LDP has promised is to 'work on' a reduction of the consumption tax on foods," noted Norihiro Yamaguchi, senior Japan economist at Oxford Economics, implying it is not a firm commitment. "If there is no longer a need to accommodate the opposition's demands, the necessity for doing so naturally diminishes."

Saudi Arabia has opened its stock market to all foreign investors, a landmark move under its Vision 2030 plan to liberalize the economy and reduce its dependence on oil revenue.

Previously, direct access to the Saudi Exchange, or Tadawul, was restricted to qualified institutional investors selected by authorities. As of February 1, that has changed. Smaller institutions, funds, family offices, and individual investors are now permitted to participate directly, without needing to use swap arrangements or exchange-traded funds.

The market has responded positively. The Tadawul All-Share Index has climbed approximately 10% since the Capital Market Authority (CMA) announced the reform on January 6, reversing a downtrend from the previous ten weeks. Mohanad Yakout, a senior market analyst at Scope Markets, noted that the jump shows investors view the policy as a "meaningful catalyst for revising up the market's valuation."

Vision 2030: The Strategy Behind the Market Opening

The Tadawul is the largest and most liquid stock market in the Middle East, with a capitalization of 8.8 trillion Saudi riyals ($2.35 trillion) at the end of 2025. Foreign stock ownership had already increased by 92 billion riyals to 590 billion riyals in the first three quarters of 2025.

Several benchmark index companies already have significant foreign investment.

• Al-Babtain Power & Telecom: 33.8% foreign-held

• Edarat Group: 24.6% foreign-held

• Etihad Etisalat: 23.74% foreign-held

While the 49% cap on foreign ownership in any single listed company remains in place, Yakout believes this liberalization intensifies "competition for regional financial primacy with the Emirati markets that have historically benefited from more permissive foreign ownership regimes."

This market opening is part of a broader national transformation. Over the past decade, Saudi Arabia has worked to soften its image by easing regulations, opening cinemas, and introducing tourist visas. It has also successfully bid for major global events like the FIFA World Cup 2034 and World Expo 2030. In January, a new law was implemented allowing non-Muslim foreigners to own property.

The push for economic diversification comes as the government faces pressure from lower oil prices. It more than doubled its 2025 budget deficit forecast to 5.3% of GDP and expects a deficit of 165 billion riyals, or 3.3% of GDP, for this year. This fiscal pressure is widely seen as a key driver for economic reforms.

Investing in Saudi Arabia: Weighing the Risks

Despite the opportunities, analysts caution that investing in the Saudi market carries significant risks, primarily because many of its largest companies are closely tied to the state.

Popular listings with Asian investors—including Saudi Aramco, Saudi Basic Industries, Al Rajhi Bank, and ACWA Power—offer growth at a reasonable price. However, these companies operate in strategic sectors like energy, chemicals, banking, and utilities, which are subject to intense government control.

Figure 1: State-owned giants like oil producer Saudi Aramco, which went public in 2019, are cornerstones of the Tadawul exchange but also pose unique risks for investors due to significant government influence.

"Competition is limited, government involvement is high, and decision-making reflects longer-term strategic priorities rather than short-term shareholder returns," said Alice Gower, a partner at Azure Strategy.

Other risks cited by analysts include the economy's heavy reliance on oil prices and a perceived lack of robust shareholder protections.

The Case for Investing: Scale, Liquidity, and Stability

While risks exist, the sheer scale and liquidity of the Saudi market help mitigate them, particularly for long-term investors. In contrast, Dubai's stock market may offer higher potential returns but also comes with greater cyclical risk tied to real estate, retail flows, and shifting investor sentiment. This leads investors to adopt a more tactical approach in Dubai.

Saudi Arabia also offers a stable investment environment in other ways.

• No Formal Capital Controls: Foreign investors can generally repatriate capital and profits without restriction.

• Currency Stability: The Saudi riyal is pegged to the U.S. dollar, anchoring the exchange rate.

• Free Currency Conversion: Investors can convert currency freely.

These factors boost investor confidence. However, Pratibha Thaker, editorial director at the Economist Intelligence Unit, pointed out that "indirect constraints remain in the form of foreign ownership limits, sectoral restrictions and administrative frictions, which can still shape investment decisions and limit control-seeking strategies."

What's Next for the Saudi Market?

With the Vision 2030 agenda in full swing, some experts expect further liberalization. The most significant potential change on the horizon involves the foreign ownership cap.

"The biggest needle mover will be any changes to foreign ownership caps, which is considered a possible move later this year," said Gower. Such a reform could unlock another wave of foreign capital and further integrate the Tadawul into the global financial system.

China's foreign ministry has expressed regret over the expiration of the New START treaty, the landmark nuclear arms agreement between the United States and Russia. Beijing is now urging Washington to resume strategic dialogue with Moscow to maintain global stability.

The treaty, which for over half a century placed limits on the strategic nuclear arsenals of both nations, officially lapsed on Wednesday. In response, Russia stated it remains open to security discussions but will counter any emerging threats.

Beijing Voices Concern Over Global Nuclear Order

Foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian articulated China's position, describing the treaty's expiration as a regrettable development with serious implications.

"China regrets the expiration of the New START Treaty, as the treaty is of great significance to maintaining global strategic stability," Lin stated. He noted widespread international concern that the treaty's end could negatively impact the global nuclear arms control framework.

Following Russia's proposal to continue observing the treaty's core limitations, China has called on the United States to engage constructively.

"China calls on the United States to respond positively, handle the treaty's follow-up arrangements responsibly, and resume strategic stability dialogue with Russia as soon as possible," Lin added, emphasizing that this reflects the expectations of the international community.

China's Stance on Its Own Nuclear Arsenal

The foreign ministry also took the opportunity to reiterate China's established nuclear policy. Lin emphasized that China adheres strictly to a self-defense strategy and maintains its nuclear forces at the minimum level required for national security.

"China has consistently adhered to a self-defense nuclear strategy, abided by the policy of no first use of nuclear weapons and has made unconditional commitments not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states or nuclear-weapon-free zones," he explained.

Lin also addressed China's role in future arms control negotiations, stating that its arsenal is not comparable in size to those of Washington and Moscow. Citing this disparity, he confirmed that China will not participate in their bilateral disarmament talks at this stage.

Meanwhile, the White House indicated this week that President Donald Trump would determine the future of U.S. nuclear arms control policy and would "clarify on his own timeline."