• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Trending
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
BID
ASK
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6857.13
6857.13
6857.13
6865.94
6827.13
+7.41
+ 0.11%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
47850.93
47850.93
47850.93
48049.72
47692.96
-31.96
-0.07%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23505.13
23505.13
23505.13
23528.53
23372.33
+51.04
+ 0.22%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
98.870
98.950
98.870
98.980
98.870
-0.110
-0.11%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.16556
1.16563
1.16556
1.16561
1.16408
+0.00111
+ 0.10%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.33407
1.33414
1.33407
1.33413
1.33165
+0.00136
+ 0.10%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4219.76
4220.19
4219.76
4221.12
4194.54
+12.59
+ 0.30%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
59.277
59.314
59.277
59.469
59.187
-0.106
-0.18%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

Cctv - China, France: Signed Protocol On Sanitary, Phytosanitary Requirements For Export Of French Alfalfa Grass

Share

India's NIFTY IT Index Last Up 1.3%

Share

India's Nifty 50 Index Rises 0.35%

Share

Israel Sets 2026 Defence Budget At $34 Billion

Share

Russia Says Azov Sea's Port Of Temryuk Damaged In Ukrainian Attack

Share

Israel's Defense Budget For 2026 Will Be 112 Billion Israeli Shekels - Defense Minister Office

Share

One India Rate Panel Member Ram Singh Was Of View That Stance Should Be Changed To 'Accommodative' From 'Neutral' - Monetary Policy Committee Statement

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief: Will Continue To Meet Productive Needs Of Economy In Proactive Manner

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief: System Level Financial Parameters Of Nbfcs Sound

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief: Dollar Rupee Swap To Be For 3 Years, To Be Conducted This Month

Share

India's Nifty Realty Index Extend Gains, Last Up 1.4%

Share

India's Nifty Psu Bank Index Rises 1%

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief: Commited To Providing Sufficient Durable Liquidity

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief: Transmission Has Been Broad Based Across Sectors, Satisfactory

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief: As Of Nov 28, India's Forex Reserves Stood At $686 Billion

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief: Healthy Services Exports With Strong Remittances To Keep Cad Modest In This Year

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief: CPI Inflation Seen At 0.6% In Q3 Fy26

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief: Fy26 CPI Inflation Seen At 2% Versus 2.6% Previously

Share

India's Nifty Realty Index Up 1% After Reserve Bank Of India's Rate Cut

Share

India's Nifty Psu Bank Index Turns Positive, Up 0.43% After Reserve Bank Of India's Rate Cut

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
Turkey Trade Balance

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany Construction PMI (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone IHS Markit Construction PMI (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Italy IHS Markit Construction PMI (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Markit/CIPS Construction PMI (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

France 10-Year OAT Auction Avg. Yield

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Retail Sales MoM (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Retail Sales YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Brazil GDP YoY (Q3)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Challenger Job Cuts (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Challenger Job Cuts MoM (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Challenger Job Cuts YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Initial Jobless Claims 4-Week Avg. (SA)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Initial Jobless Claims (SA)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Continued Jobless Claims (SA)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Ivey PMI (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Ivey PMI (Not SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders Revised MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (SA) (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Excl. Transport) (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Weekly Natural Gas Stocks Change

A:--

F: --

P: --

Saudi Arabia Crude Oil Production

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Treasuries Held by Foreign Central Banks

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Foreign Exchange Reserves (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Repo Rate

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Benchmark Interest Rate

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Reverse Repo Rate

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Cash Reserve Ratio

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Leading Indicators Prelim (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Halifax House Price Index YoY (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Halifax House Price Index MoM (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

France Current Account (Not SA) (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

France Trade Balance (SA) (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

France Industrial Output MoM (SA) (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Italy Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Employment YoY (SA) (Q3)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Final YoY (Q3)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Final QoQ (Q3)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Employment Final QoQ (SA) (Q3)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Employment Final (SA) (Q3)

--

F: --

P: --
Brazil PPI MoM (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Mexico Consumer Confidence Index (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Unemployment Rate (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Labor Force Participation Rate (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Employment (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Part-Time Employment (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Full-time Employment (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PCE Price Index YoY (SA) (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Personal Outlays MoM (SA) (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Core PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. UMich 5-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Prelim YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Core PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. 5-10 Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. UMich Consumer Expectations Index Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    Connecting
    .
    .
    .
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          US Envoy Heads To Russia As Putin Claims Key Ukrainian City Fell

          Daniel Carter

          Political

          Russia-Ukraine Conflict

          Summary:

          US envoy Steve Witkoff is traveling to Moscow to meet with President Vladimir Putin.

          US envoy Steve Witkoff is traveling to Moscow to meet with President Vladimir Putin, who claimed a key Ukrainian city had fallen to Russia on the eve of the talks about a potential peace plan to end his war.
          Putin said Russian troops had taken the city of Pokrovsk in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region in a video announcement posted late Monday by the Kremlin. Ukraine hasn't commented so far on the claim, which would represent Russia's most significant battlefield advance in nearly two years.
          Witkoff is due to hold talks with Putin on Tuesday on the latest proposals for ending Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine following negotiations between US and Ukrainian officials in Florida. Amid fears in Europe that the plan risks rewarding Russian aggression by forcing Kyiv into a deal, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said the latest version "looks better" during a visit to Paris on Monday to meet with French counterpart Emmanuel Macron.
          Putin has signaled an openness to talks, saying last week that Trump's proposals for ending the war could be "the basis for future agreements," while adding that no final version exists yet. Still, he's given no sign that he's ready to roll back Russian demands.
          Witkoff, who'll meet Putin in Russia for the sixth time this year, promoted the original 28-point plan that emerged last month and was drawn up together with Kremlin envoy Kirill Dmitriev. Those proposals horrified officials in Ukraine and Europe by outlining Kremlin demands for concessions that Kyiv has repeatedly rejected.
          An Oct. 14 phone call between Witkoff and Putin's foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov showed that the US envoy suggested they work together on a plan to end the war in Ukraine modeled on Trump's Gaza peace deal, according to a recording of the conversation reviewed and transcribed by Bloomberg. Ushakov and Dmitriev also discussed the plans in an Oct. 29 phone call.
          The seizure of Pokrovsk, a defensive hub that's been the focus of intense fighting for more than a year, would potentially open up the path for Russia to threaten the larger cities of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk. It would offer Moscow a symbolic victory as Putin continues to insist that Ukraine must surrender the entire Donetsk region under a deal to end the war.
          Ukraine previously acknowledged that Russian troops had entered Pokrovsk though it rejected Moscow's claims that Kyiv's forces in the city had been encircled.
          US President Donald Trump has urged Russia and Ukraine to halt fighting along existing battle lines as part of the peace initiative. After meeting with Putin in Alaska in August, Trump abandoned plans in October for a second summit with the Russian leader in Budapest when the US concluded that Moscow wasn't ready for substantive changes to its maximalist demands for ending the war.
          Zelenskiy, who began a visit to Ireland on Tuesday, has repeatedly said he'll agree to a ceasefire.
          Russia first attempted to occupy Pokrovsk, a former mining hub that's now almost totally destroyed, in July 2024. A surprise Ukrainian counteroffensive into Russia's Kursk region the following month helped relieve the pressure as Moscow diverted forces to confront the incursion.
          After Russia drove Ukrainian troops out of Kursk, with help from North Korean soldiers sent by Kim Jong Un to support Putin, Moscow renewed strikes on Pokrovsk during the summer.

          Source: Bloomberg Europe

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          US Dollar Is Lost In Translation – Dollar Index (DXY) Outlook

          MarketPulse by OANDA Group

          Forex

          Economic

          Catalysts for movements in the US Dollar have been confusing all types of Market Participants.

          Reaching new cycle highs during the longest ever US Government shutdown (43 days), the Greenback consequently fell as the government reopened, driven by dovish hopes for the December 10 FOMC meeting.

          Current yo-yos in the dollar are leaving traders in question.

          All of this comes after a massive downtrend throughout the first half of the year due to tariffs and unpredictable policies from Donald Trump, requiring dollar-diversification from many economic and political parties around the world.

          Dollar funding is also not at its best levels, with Reverse Repo (RRP) facilities (Bank Reserves at the Fed) at the lowest levels in years, a liquidity drain that is provoking significantly more volatile movements in the USD.

          The pricing for the FOMC meeting, the last one of the year occurring in 10 days, peaked Friday very close to 90% and has now backed down to 85% amidst a lack of fresh data to influence pricing. Friday's Core PCE report may affect the entire pricing.

          Rate Cut Pricing for the December 10 FOMC Meeting, December 1, 2025 – Source: CMEGroup

          At its session lows, the Dollar Index was down almost 1.50% from its past week highs but has been subject to a V-shape rebound today.

          The latest story? The White House could be preparing for a defeat regarding tariffs—potentially linked to recent court challenges blocking IEEPA-based levies—bringing natural mean-reversion flows to the dollar after quite a brutal weekly open.

          Let's dive into Dollar Index charts as the USD makes its way back to being the second best performer of the FX session to start December.

          Dollar Index (DXY) Multi-timeframe Outlook

          Daily Chart

          Dollar Index (DXY) Daily Chart, December 1 2025 – Source: TradingView

          The US Dollar has seen some violent up and down swings in November after a flawless ascent.

          After forming a bottom at the September FOMC (highlighted in a preceding USD analysis), the Greenback gained back a lot of traction and peaked at 100.376 on November 20.

          Having double topped at this point but also double bottomed after today's rebound, confusing reversals point towards a large trading range between 99.00 and 100.00.

          Some banks are expressing concerns regarding the low levels of Reserves and with the confusion regarding the future path of Fed Cuts, a much lower correction is being prevented.

          Individual currencies are also subject to their own dynamics like the Yen (JPY) retaking some ground after BoJ Governor Ueda's comments, in between much else.

          To spot how sharp the reversals are, let's take a closer look to intraday timeframes.

          4H Chart and Technical Levels

          Dollar Index (DXY) 4H Chart, December 1 2025 – Source: TradingView

          You can spot further details on the V-shaped action in the US Dollar today which also corresponded to a test of oversold RSI levels.

          The more rangebound a price action will be, the more it will respond to extreme conditions in RSI or other momentum indicators.

          The recent low rebound points to immediate USD strength but it will face some hurdles which we will see on the 1H timeframe.

          Levels to place on your DXY charts:

          Resistance Levels

          · 100.00 to 100.50 Main resistance zone
          · 100.376 November highs
          · 99.80 mini-resistance
          · 99.40 to 99.50 Key Pivot (Immediate Test)

          Support Levels

          · Higher timeframe Pivot 98.80 to 99.00 (Daily Rebound and range lows)
          · Past week lows and double bottom 99.03
          · Mini-support 98.50 and 200-Day MA
          · Main support 98.00

          1H Chart

          Dollar Index (DXY) 1H Chart, December 1 2025 – Source: TradingView

          The Dollar Index is forming an hourly descending Channel which served as support for the Daily rebound.

          Now testing the Key Pivot (99.40 to 99.50), it will be interesting to see if the reversal higher extends to confirm the Range – Keep an eye on the 50-Hour MA (at 99.47)

          For this, dollar bulls will also have to break out of the hourly channel.

          If they do, the range is confirmed. Rejecting the highs of the channel would on the other hand maintain the downward momentum.

          It will be interesting to keep an eye on changes to the pricing for the FOMC meeting.

          Source: MarketPulse by OANDA Group

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Taiwan Urges Calm as China-Japan Tensions Risk Year-Long Standoff

          Gerik

          Political

          Taiwan’s Diplomatic Warning Over Prolonged China-Japan Tensions

          In a recent interview with Bloomberg News, Taiwanese Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung signaled that the dispute between China and Japan, ignited by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments on Taiwan, could potentially last for another year. This projection reflects a cautious but realistic assessment of the geopolitical friction in East Asia, where rhetoric over Taiwan’s status continues to draw sharp reactions from Beijing.
          The current diplomatic tension began when Prime Minister Takaichi suggested that Japanese troops could become involved if China were to invade Taiwan. This remark, which Beijing interpreted as crossing a diplomatic “red line,” led to economic and political reprisals. These included a strong rebuke from Chinese authorities and retaliatory measures aimed at Japanese economic interests, although specific sanctions were not detailed. Takaichi refused to retract her statement, further intensifying the standoff.

          Taipei's Role and Soft Diplomacy

          Minister Lin emphasized that Taiwan does not benefit from heightened tensions and expressed hope that the situation would stabilize over time. He noted that it is not in China’s interest to escalate the conflict either, implying a causal relationship between diplomatic restraint and long-term regional benefit. Rather than fueling division, Taiwan’s strategy appears to be focused on calming tensions through symbolic gestures. Lin encouraged Taiwanese citizens to continue traveling to Japan and purchasing Japanese products, contrasting with mass cancellations from Chinese tourists a response driven by nationalist backlash.
          This approach highlights Taiwan’s application of “soft diplomacy,” aiming to support Japan without provoking further hostility from China. Lin described this as a “soft approach” to maintaining solidarity while promoting de-escalation.

          Call for Responsible Regional Behavior

          President Lai Ching-te also weighed in, calling on Beijing to behave like a responsible global power. This appeal reflects Taiwan’s consistent diplomatic narrative that stresses international norms and peaceful dialogue, especially when regional tensions threaten broader security dynamics.
          While the immediate trigger for this geopolitical clash was rooted in rhetoric, the consequences have spilled into diplomatic and economic domains, demonstrating a correlation between inflammatory political statements and tangible international fallout. Taiwan’s leadership continues to walk a strategic tightrope, supporting democratic allies while avoiding steps that could further destabilize the region. As the region braces for what could be a protracted period of tension, Taiwan’s measured stance underscores the value of calibrated diplomacy in a complex and high-stakes environment.

          Source: Reuters

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          China, Japan In Fresh Incident Around Disputed Islands

          Samantha Luan

          Political

          Economic

          Japanese and Chinese vessels engaged in a fresh standoff around disputed islands on Tuesday, the two countries' coast guards said.

          Relations have been strained since Japan's new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi suggested last month that her country could intervene militarily in any Chinese attack on Taiwan.

          Japan's coast guard said two Chinese coast guard patrol ships entered Japan's territorial waters around the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea in the early hours of Tuesday, and left a few hours later.

          The Japanese-administered Senkaku Islands, known as the Diaoyu in China, have been a regular flashpoint between the two nations over the decades.

          After the patrol ships sailed toward a Japanese fishing boat, a Japanese coast guard vessel issued a demand that they leave the waters, the Japanese coast guard statement said.

          "The activities of Chinese coast guard vessels navigating within Japan's territorial waters around the Senkaku Islands while asserting their own claims fundamentally violate international law," it said.

          The statement added that the two Chinese vessels, and others, were still in the area.

          China Coast Guard spokesman Liu Dejun said that a Japanese fishing vessel "illegally entered China's territorial waters."

          "China Coast Guard vessels took necessary control measures and made warnings to drive it away," Liu said on the China Coast Guard's official WeChat account.

          "The China Coast Guard will continue to conduct rights protection and law enforcement activities in the waters around the Diaoyu Islands, resolutely safeguarding national territorial sovereignty and maritime rights," he added.

          It followed a similar incident around the islands on November 16, around a week after Takaichi's comments, Kyodo News reported.

          China claims self-ruled Taiwan as part of its territory and has not ruled out using force to take the democratic island.

          Beijing has urged its citizens to avoid travel to Japan and a number of cultural events have been hit — including the halt of a performance by a Japanese singer in Shanghai on Friday.

          Aside from reportedly renewing a ban on Japanese seafood imports, China has however so far stopped short of imposing more serious economic measures such as curbing exports of rare earth metals.

          Source: Koreatimes

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          US Firms Are Snapping Up The Rare Earths Europe Needs To Rearm

          Justin

          Commodity

          Stocks

          As Europe embarks on a historic rearming effort, its defense companies are scrambling for a vital component in high-tech weapons: rare earth minerals, which more nimble US rivals are scooping up.

          Despite a one-year rare earths trade war truce between the US and China, Beijing maintains tight controls on supplies and prohibits sales to companies that produce weapons.

          That has made stockpiles already outside China even more precious — European rare earths supplies may begin running dry in months by some estimates — and incentivized defense companies to be quick and ruthless in securing them.

          So far, US companies have been much better at navigating that landscape than their European counterparts.

          "If we look at how long it takes us on average to sell, say, a ton of terbium to a European partner, we're talking about three to four weeks; with the Americans it's more like three to four days," said Tim Borgschulte, chief financial officer at Berlin-based critical raw materials trader Noble Elements.

          Rare earths are necessary for defense components such as advanced sensors and precision motors, used in everything from frigates to fighter jets to military drones. Component makers are already feeling the squeeze.

          Dwindling stockpiles in Europe may leave just months before production is affected, according to a person familiar with the matter at a European defense company.

          Jan Giese, senior manager for rare earth elements at Frankfurt-based metals trading company Tradium GmbH, said US defense companies are using their heft and financial firepower to secure supplies and funnel them as far upstream as they can to component suppliers.

          This can mean less scrutiny of the transaction and obscures a portion of the supply chain — a hedge against harsher restrictions from China. It also ensures component suppliers have what they need.

          By contrast, European defense companies are trying to buy rare earths directly, without coordinating with suppliers, and with little government support. Borgschulte said his defense customers often don't know the quantity and quality of rare earths they need and when they need them, creating last-second purchases that fall short of requirements.

          US companies are more creative with how they use supply chain knowledge, Giese said.

          "The Americans have a sense of urgency, a financial might and people with both mandates and expertise making decisions, all of which are things that Europe is sorely lacking," he said.

          A person familiar with the matter at a German defense company said their US counterparts were much more aggressive in the European market. The Americans' speed at tracking down and buying rare earths has left the company with just small amounts available at high prices, the person said.

          Chinese rare earths sold before April 2025, when defense export restrictions went into force, are snapped up quickly. It is difficult to quantify the amount of rare earth elements in circulation because of high turnover rates.

          There are no EU restrictions on where rare earths in Europe can be sold or shipped, opening the door to outflow to other continents.

          The US has prioritized becoming more independent from Chinese supplies and taken a government stake in MP Materials Corp., which operates the only US rare earths mine, in California. The US Department of Defense will pay guaranteed minimum prices for MP Materials' supplies for a decade, protecting the company from sudden market swings.

          For its part, the EU adopted the Critical Raw Materials Act in 2024 and this week is set to anniunce the details of its new RESourceEU initiative. Both are meant to decrease resource dependence on China by developing domestic supply chains and critical minerals partnerships with other countries outside the bloc. German development bank KfW set up a €1 billion raw materials fund a year ago.

          Armin Papperger, chief executive officer of Germany's biggest arms maker, Rheinmetall AG, said on an earnings call in early November that the company was conducting weekly raw material stress tests. He noted that its automotive business faced greater difficulties than its larger defense branch because it needed more rare earths.

          "We have billions in our stock at the moment," Papperger said on the call in reference to critical materials and components.

          Smaller companies can't often afford such measures, and rare earths stockpiling creates the risk of getting stuck with costly excess.

          Hans Christoph Atzpodien, chairman of the Federation of German Security and Defence Industries, disputed that European companies were unprepared for China's rare earths restrictions. He noted that processing — not mining the minerals themselves — was the main hurdle for creating domestic supplies.

          "Rare earths are also found in Europe and even in Germany. However, in the past, we have been happy to outsource processing to China, which is no longer feasible," Atzpodien said in a statement from the association.

          Rare earths processing produces hazardous byproducts, which makes it difficult to get regulatory approval, and many European countries lack refining technology. In France, Borgschulte said, some rare earths companies have lured workers out of retirement so they can rebuild institutional knowledge.

          Germany is negotiating a potential submarine deal with Canada that could include Berlin's investing in mining and processing there. Canada has some of the world's largest rare earth reserves, estimated by the government at over 15.2 million tonnes.

          European allies should work together on making rare earth supply chains less reliant on China, said Thorsten Benner, co-founder and director of the Global Public Policy Institute in Berlin.

          "It has to be: 'Whatever it takes' — just like in the Euro crisis," he said.

          Source: Bloomberg Europe

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          China's Yuan Slips From 14-month Peak As PBOC Signals Caution Over Currency Rally

          Winkelmann

          Forex

          China's yuan slipped on Tuesday, retreating from a 14-month peak against the dollar hit in the previous session, as the central bank again used its official guidance rate to signal caution over a recent spike in the Chinese currency.

          Market participants closely watch the People's Bank of China's (PBOC) daily midpointfixing for any subtle signals about the official stance on the foreign exchange market.

          The central bank has been generally setting the midpoint firmer than market expectations since last November. However, the official fix came in weaker than market projections for the fourth straight session on Tuesday, the longest such streak since last September, a move traders interpreted as an effort to slow the pace of yuan rises.

          Prior to market opening, the PBOC set the midpoint rateat 7.0794 per dollar, its weakest since November 26, and 48 pips weaker than a Reuters estimateof 7.0746. The spot yuan is allowed to trade a maximum of 2% either side of the fixed midpoint each day.

          "It appears aimed at arresting the recent rapid declines in the dollar/yuan pair," said a trader at a foreign bank.

          The onshore yuantraded at 7.0745 per dollar as of 0412 GMT, down from a 14-month high of 7.0650 hit a day earlier. Its offshore counterpartstood at 7.0709.

          Apart from the broad dollar weakness, recent strength in the yuan also comes as companies have higher seasonal demand for yuan towards the year-end, when many exporters settle their foreign exchange receipts for various administrative requirements and for their employees.

          "Exports have shown overall strength this year ... leading to a concentrated demand for foreign exchange settlement among enterprises," analysts at GF Securities said in a note.

          "Some companies might have anticipated potential dollar volatility if the Federal Reserve lowers rates in December. Consequently, they are inclined to settle foreign exchange promptly during the current favorable period to lock in their income in yuan."

          The yuan has gained about 3.2% versus the dollar year-to-date and looked set for the biggest annual rise since 2020.

          Rapid one-way moves on either side of the currency are never ideal for policymakers as they could trigger a herd effect and lead to a market stampede, currency traders said.

          Guan Tao, global chief economist at BOC International and a former senior official with the country's foreign exchange regulator, also warned "against betting on one-sided FX market movements."

          Source: TradingView

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Hong Kong To Set Up Inquiry Into Deadly Fire

          Samantha Luan

          Political

          Economic

          Flowers are seen next to the buildings of the Wang Fuk Court housing complex after the deadly fire in Tai Po, Hong Kong, China, Dec. 2. Reuters-Yonhap

          Hong Kong will set up an independent commission of inquiry headed by a judge to determine the cause of a deadly apartment block fire that shocked the city and make recommendations to prevent a similar tragedy from happening again, its leader said Tuesday.

          John Lee, the chief executive of the Chinese region, pledged to overcome vested interests and pursue accountability for a fire that killed at least 151 people.

          "We must uncover the truth, ensure that justice is served, let the deceased rest in peace and provide comfort to the living," he told the media at a 30-minute weekly appearance completely dominated by last week's blaze.

          The fire started in scaffolding that had been set up around the Wang Fuk Court complex for maintenance work and spread to seven of the eight towers. They were home to more than 4,600 people and many have been left homeless .

          The initial investigation has focused on why the fire expanded so rapidly, overwhelming firefighting efforts.

          Authorities have cited both high winds and substandard materials used for the maintenance work — both highly flammable foam panels that had been used to block the windows and the green netting — which is required to be flame-retardant — hung around the scaffolding.

          Lee said that those responsible had mixed substandard netting with qualified netting "so as to cheat the inspection."

          Police and the city's anti-corruption authorities have already detained 14 people, including the directors and an engineering consultant of a construction company. Thirteen of them have been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter.

          Source: Koreatimes

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2025 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          FastBull Membership

          Not yet

          Purchase

          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com