Trump Says US To Hit India With 25% Tariff Starting August 1

Economic

Summary:

U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday imposed a 25% tariff on goods imported from India starting August 1, as well as an unspecified penalty for buying Russian arms and oil - moves that could strain relations with the world's most populous democracy.

The U.S. decision singles out India more severely than other major trading partners, and threatens to unravel months of talks between the two countries, undermining a key strategic partner of Washington’s and a counterbalance to China.

"While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

"They have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia’s largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD!"

In response, the Indian government said in a statement that it was studying the implications of Trump's announcements and remained dedicated to securing a fair trade deal with the U.S.

"India and the U.S. have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective," it said.

The White House had previously warned India about its high average applied tariffs - nearly 39% on agricultural products - with rates climbing to 45% on vegetable oils and around 50% on apples and corn.

Russia continued to be the top oil supplier to India during the first six months of 2025, making up 35% of overall supplies.

The United States, the world's largest economy, currently has a $45.7 billion trade deficit with India, the fifth largest.

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said Trump has been frustrated with the progress of trade talks with India and believed the 25% tariff announcement would help the situation. Hassett said more information on the additional penalty would be made "shortly."

The new U.S. tax on imports from India would be higher than many other countries that struck a deal with the Trump administration recently. Vietnam's tariff is set at 20% and Indonesia's at 19%, while the levy for Japan and the European Union is 15%.

"This is a major setback for Indian exporters, especially in sectors like textiles, footwear and furniture, as the 25% tariff will render them uncompetitive against rivals from Vietnam and China," said S.C. Ralhan, president of the Federation of Indian Export Organisation.

The chart shows India's monthly imports and export to U.S.

The news pushed the Indian rupee down 0.4% to around 87.80 against the U.S. dollar in the non-deliverable forwards market, from its close at 87.42 during market hours. Gift Nifty futures were trading at 24,692 points, down 0.6%.

The chart shows the share of top five countries for India exports with U.S. accounting for nearly 25% in past few months

CONTENTIOUS ISSUES

U.S. and Indian negotiators have held multiple rounds of discussions to resolve contentious issues, particularly over market access into India for U.S. agricultural and dairy products.

In its latest statement, India said it attached the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of its farmers, entrepreneurs and small businesses.

"The government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements," it said.

The setback comes despite earlier commitments by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump to conclude the first phase of a trade deal by autumn 2025 and expand bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030, from $191 billion in 2024.

Graphic: Graphic showing India’s top item of imports from United States

Graphic: Graphic showing India’s top item of exports to United States

Since India's short but deadly conflict with arch South Asian rival Pakistan, New Delhi has been unhappy about Trump's closeness with Islamabad and has protested, which cast a shadow over trade talks.

"Politically the relationship is in its toughest spot since the mid-1990s," said Ashok Malik, partner at advisory firm The Asia Group. "Trust has diminished. President Trump's messaging has damaged many years of careful, bipartisan nurturing of the U.S.-India partnership in both capitals."

Besides farm products access, the U.S. had flagged concerns over India's increasingly burdensome import-quality requirements, among its many non-tariff barriers to foreign trade, in a report released in March.

The new tariffs will impact Indian goods exports to the U.S., estimated at around $87 billion in 2024, including labour-intensive products such as garments, pharmaceuticals, gems and jewelry, and petrochemicals.

Reporting by Susan Heavey, Katharine Jackson in Washington, Manoj Kumar and Aftab Ahmed in New Delhi; editing by Doina Chiacu, Bernadette Baum and Mark Heinrich

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Blue River

Economic

Forex

Technical Analysis

The GBPUSD is extending to a new low today, as bearish pressure intensifies technically. This move is significant because the pair is now trading below its 100-day moving average, currently at 1.33339. That level had acted as a temporary floor yesterday, with buyers stepping in to defend it. However, today's price action shows a shift in sentiment, with sellers gaining more control and pushing the pair lower.

The break below the 100-day moving average tilts the technical outlook more negatively. As long as price stays below that key moving average, bearish bias remains in play. The next major downside focus is the 38.2% retracement of the 2025 move up—from the low to the high—which comes in at 1.31403.

That retracement level is further supported by a key swing area between 1.3145 and 1.3202, making it an important target and potential support zone. If sellers can drive through that region, the downside momentum could accelerate. For now, the battle lines are drawn between the 100-day MA above and a wide target of 1.3140–1.3200 below.

The FOMC will meet later today with the Fed expected to leave rates unchanged. The question is will the Fed shift to a more dovish stance ahead of what will likely be a tick up in inflation due the tariff?

Source: ForexLive

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Thomas

Central Bank

It’s safe to expect that we aren’t going to get a rate cut, and it’s safe to expect that the president will be unhappy about that. Besides that, probably the only drama to watch for will be whether we get dissents from Waller and Bowman. If that happens it would be the first time since 1993 that two Fed governors voted against the chair.

Anyway, one reason we’re not going to get a rate cut today is that basically the economy seems to be doing fine, or at least a lot better than expected. This morning we got the first look at second quarter GDP, and it came in at 3.0% vs. expectations of just 2.6%. We also got the ADP employment report, which showed that private businesses added 104,000 jobs in July, which was higher than the 76,000 that economists had expected.

Now yeah, sure, ADP doesn’t have a great track record of anticipating the government’s Non-Farm Payrolls report (which comes out Friday) but it adds to the data showing labor market resilience. Initial Jobless Claims have been coming down for weeks. Yesterday we got the Dallas Fed’s Services Activity survey, which showed a broad rebound across several measures, including hiring, which turned positive.

It’s not that the economy is doing great, per se, but with measures of inflation still on the warm side, there’s no acute sign of labor market distress that warrant immediate attention.

The other thing about rate cuts is that, even if we were to get them soon, they won’t accomplish what Trump wants them to, which is to make it easier for people to buy or refi their homes.

Here’s what he posted on Truth Social today:

You can lower rates in the short-term all you want, but if the market perceives that higher rates will be needed in the future in order to maintain the 2% inflation target, then rates at the long end (which is what mortgages or refis are linked to) will remain near today’s elevated level that constrains housing activity (and it is constraining housing activity, so Trump’s concern here is understandable).

Earlier in this spring, there were clearer signs of economic deceleration, but concerns over tariff policy were making the Fed reluctant to react aggressively. Noe the picture is different. While tariff policy still seems to be changing by the day, the range of potential outcomes is narrowing as various deals get announced or signed. Meanwhile, the underlying data just isn’t looking as wobbly as it was, giving the Fed further scope to be patient.

Source: Bloomberg Europe

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Bond

Yesterday, we touched on the continued market bullishness, which seems unstoppable. However, one market area that has seen continued “bearishness” has been longer-duration bonds. Following the significant surge in 2024, bonds’ weakness has been the source for various media narratives of the “loss of US exceptionalism” and the “end of the debt bubble.”

Bond yields currently trade in alignment with economic growth and inflation. However, there is a concern that economic growth is slowing, which would lead to lower bond yields and higher prices. The price chart of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NASDAQ:TLT) may suggest the same.

However, from a trading perspective, bonds have been basing since January and have recently formed an inverse “head and shoulders” pattern. That consolidation pattern is a bullish setup for investors, and a break above 88 on the index will likely see significantly stronger bond prices emerge.

Long Duration Bonds Could Be Poised for a Bullish Rebound_1

Given that bonds are both a “risk-off” asset and a store for reserve currencies, we also see support for bond prices building in the US Dollar, which is also forming a base. If the dollar strengthens, this should lead to inflows into US bonds, helping support higher bond prices.

Long Duration Bonds Could Be Poised for a Bullish Rebound_2

With the building of exuberance in the stock market, a reversion in speculative assets could result in a rotation into currently undervalued assets. Given the long duration of time these assets have been under pressure, it is worth considering the potential for such a rotation. Historically, reversions to the mean tend to be significant moves, just like in the stock market. The Dollar Remains Dominant

The graph below, courtesy of GaveKal Research, is making the rounds on X. The point is that the dollar is gaining global market share versus the Euro. Such is also true of the dollar versus other currencies. For those in the imminent dollar demise camp, here are a few facts worth considering:

Per SWIFT, the dollar’s share of global payments is up to 48%, the highest in 13 years, as shown below. For those thinking the Chinese yuan could supplant the dollar, the yuan is roughly 3% of global payments.

Almost 60% of global FX reserves are in dollars. That is about 3x gold and the next largest FX reserve, the euro.

The US Dollar is also involved in nearly 90% of all foreign exchange transactions.

The US economy accounts for about a quarter of the global economy. Additionally, throw in the fact that the US financial markets are the most liquid in the world, and it’s little wonder that there is no viable replacement for the dollar, despite the desires of some countries looking for one and some dollar bears calling for the immediate demise of the dollar.

Long Duration Bonds Could Be Poised for a Bullish Rebound_3

The graph below, from Michael Green, is the best way to show the logic that drives a Ponzi scheme in Bitcoin.

The Ponzi scheme graph illustrates that there is a robust correlation between changes in the amount of Bitcoin held in funds (ETFs) and the price change. Simply, as new capital is used to buy Bitcoin, the price goes up. Conversely, when they sell, the price goes down. The graph below allows us to quantify that change. Per his research:

Buying 50k in Bitcoin in a month raises the price of Bitcoin by about 18%.

MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR), as we previously wrote HERE, is a money-losing company. However, they (and others) have been issuing stock and using the proceeds to buy Bitcoin. The graph illustrates that as funds accumulate, the price of Bitcoin increases reliably.

Fund flows and prices of most other assets are not nearly as statistically correlated as the relationship shared below. However, what the graph doesn’t show is that as MicroStrategy and others add to their hoards, the profits on MicroStrategy’s existing Bitcoin holdings increase. For example, the company just issued $2.5 billion of preferred stock. That will allow MicroStrategy to buy approximately 21k Bitcoin. Based on the graph, that purchase should increase Bitcoin prices by over 7%. Here is the kicker: MicroStrategy already owns 607k Bitcoins. Thus, the $2.5 billion purchase is expected to result in a $5 billion gain on its existing holdings.

As long as funds and companies like MicroStrategy and others continue to accumulate in aggregate, and the statistical correlation holds, the Ponzi scheme will work. However, selling, or even the threat of selling, could be very problematic and would reverse the Ponzi scheme spectacularly. Like all Ponzi schemes, this one will not last forever. In the words of legendary investor John Bogle:

All Ponzi schemes ultimately fail because they depend on an ever-increasing flow of new money to sustain the illusion of profitability.

Long Duration Bonds Could Be Poised for a Bullish Rebound_4

Source: investing

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Samantha Luan

Economic

Forex

Forex Market Alert: Dollar’s Vulnerable Position Ahead of Crucial Fed Decision

As the world anticipates a pivotal Fed Decision Impact, the ripples are already being felt across currency markets, signaling potential implications for Bitcoin and altcoins. This article delves into the current state of the dollar and euro, examining the forces at play and what the upcoming central bank announcements might mean for global finance.

Understanding the Pivotal Fed Decision Impact

The Federal Reserve, often simply called ‘the Fed,’ stands as the central bank of the United States, wielding immense power over global financial markets. Its mandate includes fostering maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates. The decisions made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), particularly concerning the federal funds rate, resonate far beyond U.S. borders, directly influencing the US Dollar Strength and, by extension, the entire global economy.

So, why is this particular Fed decision so pivotal? In an environment grappling with persistent inflation and fluctuating economic growth, the Fed’s stance on monetary policy becomes a critical determinant of market direction. A hawkish stance (implying higher interest rates) typically strengthens the dollar as it makes dollar-denominated assets more attractive to foreign investors seeking higher returns. Conversely, a dovish pivot (suggesting lower rates or a pause in hikes) can weaken the dollar. The market’s anticipation of this decision, and any subtle shifts in the Fed’s language or ‘dot plot’ projections, can trigger significant currency movements even before the official announcement.

Historically, moments leading up to Fed decisions are characterized by heightened volatility. Traders and investors meticulously analyze every piece of economic data – from inflation figures like the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI) to employment reports suchances as Non-Farm Payrolls and GDP growth – trying to predict the Fed’s next move. A decision to pause rate hikes, or even hint at future cuts, could signal a shift in the Interest Rate Outlook, potentially easing financial conditions and impacting everything from bond yields to equity valuations and, crucially, currency valuations.

Deconstructing the US Dollar Strength Conundrum

The US Dollar Strength has been a defining feature of global finance for much of the past year, driven by aggressive interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve aimed at taming inflation. However, recent economic data and evolving market expectations have started to chip away at this dominance, causing the dollar to slip slightly against a basket of major currencies. What factors are contributing to this conundrum?

● Cooling Inflation Signals: While inflation remains elevated, recent reports have shown signs of cooling, leading some market participants to believe that the Fed might be nearing the end of its tightening cycle. If inflation is indeed trending downwards, the urgency for further aggressive rate hikes diminishes, reducing the dollar’s appeal.

● Revised Rate Hike Expectations: Markets are constantly repricing the probability of future rate hikes. As economic indicators suggest a potential slowdown, or if other central banks become more hawkish, the relative advantage of holding dollars might lessen. Traders are now contemplating how many more hikes, if any, the Fed has left in its arsenal.

● Economic Data Performance: Mixed economic data from the U.S. has also played a role. While some sectors remain resilient, others show signs of softening, raising concerns about the potential for a recession. A weaker economic outlook can temper expectations for continued dollar strength, as it implies less robust investment opportunities.

● Yield Differentials: The attractiveness of a currency is heavily influenced by the interest rate it offers compared to others. As other major central banks, like the European Central Bank (ECB) or the Bank of England (BoE), continue to raise their rates, the yield differential that previously favored the dollar begins to narrow, reducing its relative appeal.

This dynamic creates a complex environment for traders. While the dollar retains its status as a safe-haven asset during times of global uncertainty, its recent ‘slip’ suggests that the market is beginning to price in a more nuanced Interest Rate Outlook, potentially signaling a less aggressive Fed going forward. This shift is keenly watched by investors across all asset classes, including those in the volatile cryptocurrency market, as a weaker dollar can sometimes correlate with stronger commodity prices and, occasionally, a boost for risk assets like Bitcoin.

Analyzing Euro Performance: Navigating a Labyrinth of Challenges

While the dollar has experienced a slight softening, the Euro Performance has been under considerably more pressure, setting it up for a potential monthly loss against the dollar and other major currencies. The Eurozone, a diverse economic bloc, faces a unique set of challenges that continue to weigh on its currency. What are these obstacles, and how do they impact the Euro’s trajectory?

● Persistent Energy Crisis: Despite efforts to diversify, Europe remains significantly impacted by energy price volatility, particularly concerning natural gas. High energy costs feed into inflation and dampen industrial output, creating a drag on economic growth and undermining investor confidence in the Eurozone’s stability.

● Geopolitical Tensions: The ongoing conflict in Ukraine continues to cast a long shadow over European economies. The proximity of the conflict creates uncertainty, impacts trade routes, and necessitates significant spending on defense and aid, diverting resources from other areas of economic development.

● ECB’s Cautious Stance: While the European Central Bank (ECB) has been raising interest rates, its pace and rhetoric have often been perceived as more cautious compared to the Fed’s aggressive tightening. This divergence in the Interest Rate Outlook between the two major central banks means that the yield offered by Euro-denominated assets might still be less attractive than those in the U.S., leading to capital outflows from the Eurozone.

● Inflation Differentials: Although inflation is a global phenomenon, the specific drivers and persistence of inflation vary. In the Eurozone, inflation is often driven by supply-side shocks, which are harder for monetary policy to address effectively. This can lead to a situation where real interest rates (nominal rates minus inflation) remain negative, further eroding the Euro’s purchasing power.

The combination of these factors creates a complex economic environment for the Eurozone, making the Euro Performance a barometer of the region’s resilience. The challenges are multifaceted, ranging from structural energy dependencies to the ongoing geopolitical landscape, all of which necessitate careful navigation by the ECB and member states. For investors, understanding these dynamics is crucial for assessing the Euro’s future potential and its role within broader Global Forex Trends.

Navigating Global Forex Trends and Their Ripple Effects

The movements of the US Dollar and Euro are not isolated events; they are integral components of broader Global Forex Trends that send ripple effects across the entire financial ecosystem. The interconnectedness of currencies means that a significant shift in one pair can trigger adjustments in others, influencing everything from trade balances to commodity prices and even the highly volatile cryptocurrency markets.

When the US Dollar Strength wanes, for example, it can make dollar-denominated commodities like oil and gold cheaper for holders of other currencies, potentially boosting their demand and price. This dynamic is crucial for commodity-exporting nations and can impact global inflation. Conversely, a stronger dollar makes imports more expensive for the U.S., potentially dampening inflation but also impacting corporate earnings for multinational companies.

Similarly, the struggles in Euro Performance can have widespread implications. A weaker Euro makes Eurozone exports more competitive but makes imports more expensive, contributing to domestic inflation. It can also impact cross-border investments and the profitability of companies operating within the Eurozone, affecting their global standing.

The concept of ‘carry trade’ is also a significant element in Global Forex Trends. This involves borrowing in a low-interest-rate currency and investing in a high-interest-rate currency. Divergent Interest Rate Outlooks between central banks can fuel or unwind these trades, leading to substantial capital flows and currency volatility. For instance, if the Fed maintains a higher rate than the ECB, it encourages capital to flow into dollar-denominated assets, bolstering the dollar and potentially pressuring the Euro.

Furthermore, currency volatility often spills over into other asset classes. In times of extreme uncertainty, the dollar traditionally acts as a ‘safe-haven’ currency, attracting capital from riskier assets. However, if the dollar itself is showing signs of vulnerability, investors might seek alternative safe havens, or conversely, be more inclined to take on risk in other markets, including the nascent but growing cryptocurrency space. The interplay between traditional forex markets and digital assets is becoming increasingly apparent, as macro-economic shifts can dictate the broader risk appetite that influences Bitcoin and altcoin prices.

The Crucial Interest Rate Outlook: Divergent Paths and Future Implications

The divergence in the Interest Rate Outlook between major central banks is arguably the most significant driver of current Global Forex Trends. While central banks worldwide have been engaged in a synchronized fight against inflation, their individual economic circumstances and policy mandates are leading them down increasingly divergent paths. This divergence has profound implications for currency valuations and the broader financial landscape.

The Federal Reserve, having embarked on an aggressive rate-hiking cycle, is now grappling with the question of whether its tightening has gone far enough to bring inflation under control without tipping the economy into a severe recession. The market is keenly watching for signals of a ‘pause’ or even future ‘cuts’ from the Fed, which would significantly alter the US Dollar Strength trajectory. A pivot towards easing would likely weaken the dollar as its yield advantage diminishes.

In contrast, the European Central Bank (ECB) has been more cautious, starting its rate hikes later and often at a slower pace than the Fed. The ECB faces a complex balancing act: fighting inflation while navigating the unique challenges of the Eurozone, including varied economic performance among member states and the ongoing energy crisis. The market’s perception of the ECB’s commitment to tightening relative to the Fed directly impacts the Euro Performance. If the ECB is perceived as lagging behind, the Euro is likely to remain under pressure.

Here’s a simplified comparison of their potential paths:

Central Bank	Current Stance	Key Challenge	Potential Future Path	Currency Impact
Federal Reserve (Fed)	Aggressive tightening, now assessing impact.	Balancing inflation control vs. recession risk.	Potential pause or slower hikes; market eyeing cuts.	Dollar potentially weakens if cuts priced in.
European Central Bank (ECB)	Raising rates, but more cautiously.	Energy crisis, geopolitical risks, diverse Eurozone economies.	Continued hikes, but pace uncertain; ‘data-dependent.’	Euro faces headwinds if perceived as lagging Fed.

The implications of these divergent paths are far-reaching. They influence capital flows, as investors seek higher returns in currencies with more attractive interest rates. They affect corporate profitability, as businesses navigate varying borrowing costs and currency exchange rates. And for individual consumers, they impact everything from mortgage rates to the cost of imported goods. Understanding this intricate dance of central bank policies and their resulting Interest Rate Outlook is fundamental to comprehending the current state and future direction of global finance.

Challenges and Opportunities in a Volatile Forex Landscape

The current volatility in the forex market, driven by shifts in US Dollar Strength and Euro Performance amidst a changing Interest Rate Outlook, presents both significant challenges and unique opportunities for businesses, investors, and even individuals.

Challenges:

● Increased Uncertainty for Businesses: Companies engaged in international trade face greater currency risk. Fluctuating exchange rates can erode profit margins for exporters and increase costs for importers, making financial planning more complex.

● Inflationary Pressures: A weakening domestic currency makes imports more expensive, contributing to inflation. This can squeeze household budgets and put pressure on central banks to continue tightening, even if economic growth is slowing.

● Investment Risk: For investors with international portfolios, currency movements can significantly impact returns. A strong dollar can diminish the value of overseas investments when converted back to dollars, and vice-versa.

Opportunities:

● Strategic Hedging: Businesses can implement hedging strategies (e.g., using forward contracts or options) to lock in exchange rates and mitigate currency risk, providing greater predictability in their international transactions.

● Diversification for Investors: Periods of currency volatility highlight the importance of a diversified investment portfolio. Holding assets denominated in different currencies can help cushion against adverse movements in a single currency. For crypto investors, understanding these macro shifts can inform decisions on stablecoin holdings or timing of entries/exits into riskier digital assets.

● Arbitrage Opportunities: For sophisticated traders, significant currency fluctuations can create arbitrage opportunities, albeit with inherent risks and requiring rapid execution.

Navigating these Global Forex Trends requires vigilance and a deep understanding of the underlying economic forces. It’s not just about predicting the next Fed move, but also about appreciating the broader macroeconomic narrative and its potential ripple effects across all markets.

Actionable Insights for Investors and Traders

In a landscape defined by a volatile Forex Market Alert and shifting central bank policies, how can investors and traders best position themselves? Here are some actionable insights:

1.Monitor Central Bank Communications Closely: Pay close attention to statements from the Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, and other major central banks. Beyond just interest rate announcements, the accompanying press conferences and minutes often contain subtle clues about future policy direction and the evolving Interest Rate Outlook.

2.Stay Updated on Key Economic Indicators: Data releases such as inflation rates (CPI, PPI), employment figures (Non-Farm Payrolls, unemployment rate), GDP growth, and consumer confidence surveys provide critical insights into the health of economies and can influence central bank decisions.

3.Understand Inter-Market Correlations: Recognize that currency movements don’t happen in isolation. A weaker US Dollar Strength or struggling Euro Performance can impact commodity prices, bond yields, equity markets, and even cryptocurrency valuations. Develop a holistic view of the financial ecosystem.

4.Consider Diversification: Don’t put all your eggs in one basket. Diversifying across different asset classes (equities, bonds, commodities, real estate, and digital assets) and geographical regions can help mitigate risks associated with currency fluctuations and specific regional economic downturns.

5.Manage Risk Prudently: Given the heightened volatility, employing robust risk management strategies is paramount. This includes setting stop-loss orders, managing position sizes, and avoiding over-leveraging, especially in highly sensitive markets like forex and crypto.

6.Educate Yourself Continuously: The global financial landscape is constantly evolving. Continuously learning about macroeconomics, geopolitical events, and technological advancements (like those in the crypto space) will empower you to make more informed decisions.

Conclusion: The Unfolding Narrative of Global Currencies

The slight slip of the US Dollar and the sustained monthly loss for the Euro ahead of the crucial Fed decision underscore a period of significant transition and uncertainty in the global financial markets. The interplay between the Fed Decision Impact, the evolving narrative around US Dollar Strength, and the ongoing challenges affecting Euro Performance is creating a complex tapestry of Global Forex Trends. Underlying all these movements is the critical Interest Rate Outlook, as central banks worldwide navigate the delicate balance between taming inflation and avoiding economic downturns.

For investors, traders, and even the general public, understanding these dynamics is no longer a niche interest but a necessity. The ripples from currency markets can affect everything from the cost of goods to the value of investment portfolios, including digital assets. As central banks continue to adapt their policies in response to evolving economic data, the volatility in forex markets is likely to persist. Staying informed, exercising prudence, and adopting a holistic view of global finance will be key to navigating this unfolding narrative successfully.

Source: CryptoSlate

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Commodity

WTI crude stalls below $69.89 resistance after June breakdown

Daily Light Crude Oil Futures

Light crude oil futures retreated on Wednesday, pulling back after failing to clear key resistance at $69.89—the 50% retracement of the June selloff from $77.09 to $62.69. This level has now capped gains for two consecutive sessions and serves as a critical trigger for directional momentum. A sustained move above $69.89 could open the door for a test of the June high at $77.09, while a pullback to $65.38 would still be technically bullish.

At 09:47 GMT, Light Crude Oil futures are trading $68.87, down $0.34 or -0.49%.

The market remains above the long-term pivot at $65.38, supported further by the 200-day moving average at $63.99 and the 50-day at $62.10. The crossover of the 200-day above the 50-day signals a bullish bias in the broader trend. Price action continues to consolidate within this structure, awaiting a breakout catalyst.

Ongoing pressure on Russian crude flows raises geopolitical risk premium

Traders are closely tracking U.S. President Donald Trump’s tightened ultimatum on Russia, demanding progress toward ending the war in Ukraine within 10 to 12 days. The administration is threatening 100% secondary tariffs on countries continuing to trade Russian oil, a move aimed squarely at China and India—Moscow’s largest customers.

Analysts at JP Morgan expect India to comply with U.S. demands, potentially displacing 2.3 million bpd of Russian barrels. China, on the other hand, is unlikely to bend, raising the risk of tariff escalation. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned that China could face significant duties if it maintains its Russian crude intake.

PVM’s John Evans noted that any resulting gap in global supply would take time to fill, even if Saudi Arabia and OPEC step in. This lag adds further support to near-term prices. Vanda Insights estimates a $4–$5 per barrel risk premium is already baked in.

Mexican exports drop sharply as Pemex prioritizes domestic refining

Adding to supply-side pressure, Mexico’s Pemex slashed exports by 39% year-over-year in June, down to 458,103 bpd—the lowest monthly volume since records began in 1990. The drop aligns with Mexico’s ongoing push for energy “sovereignty,” prioritizing domestic refining. Output remains constrained at 1.6 million bpd, well below the company’s stated goal of 1.8 million.

Pemex also reduced refined product imports by 38% last month as its new Olmeca refinery absorbed more feedstock. While the company aims to boost production via private partnerships, execution remains limited.

Oil prices forecast: Bullish bias holds above $65.38 support

Crude remains technically constructive while holding above $65.38 and both major moving averages. Resistance at $69.89 has proven sticky, but a breakout above it could fuel an upside run toward $77.09.

With geopolitical risks intact, supply constraints building, and inventory draws anticipated, the market maintains a cautiously bullish tone.

Source: fxempire

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Economic

The dispatch

Ian Holloway, one of the most eccentric managers in British football, is famous for his idioms and sayings.

One of his most celebrated came when, in May 2004, his Queens Park Rangers team had secured promotion to England’s second tier: “They say every dog has his day — and today is Woof Day. Today I just want to bark.”

Lately, the FTSE-100 , long a dog among equity indices, has been enjoying its very own Woof Day. Britain’s premier stock index is up 11% so far this year and has this month achieved a couple of notable benchmarks.

The index, launched on Jan. 3, 1984, with a value of 1,000, hit the 9,000 milestone for the first time on July 15 and followed that up on Thursday last week by hitting the latest in a string of all-time closing highs of 9,138.37.

It has taken just two years to go from 8,000 to 9,000 compared with the seven painstaking years it took to rise from 7,000 to 8,000.

The Footsie’s year-to-date performance is one of the best in global stock markets. It has outperformed other well-known benchmarks such as the S&P 500, the Nikkei 225 and the CAC-40, with the DAX-40 in Germany one of the few peers to have eclipsed it. This outperformance of the S&P 500, should it be sustained, is pretty rare.

The Footsie has only outdone the U.S. benchmark twice over the course of a year — in 2016 and 2022 — since the eruption of the global financial crisis 18 years ago. That reflects not only the dynamism and growth potential of the S&P’s constituents, chiefly the tech sector, but also the Footsie’s over-weighting in what are perceived by many investors as stodgier, defensive sectors, such as financials and consumer staples, and highly cyclical sectors such as energy and mining.

Accordingly, even after the recent performance, it is still sitting on a price/earnings multiple only just above its long-term average of 15 whereas the S&P — which, we should not forget, also hit a record last week — still trades on a multiple of almost 30.

Those ratings reflect the very different factors that have driven returns. While capital appreciation has driven just over two-thirds of the S&P’s total return over the years, roughly half of the Footsie’s total return has come from dividends.

The attachment of U.K. investors to dividends, something regularly disparaged as ‘coupon clipping’ down the years, is pronounced.

The Footsie’s solid showing last week was for similar reasons to the rallies elsewhere: relief at the U.S. achieving a deal with Japan over tariffs and optimism that something similar can be achieved with the European Union, although the latter has proved disappointing, at least so far as European equity markets have been concerned.

But there have been other, broader factors also at play during 2025.

The Footsie’s heavy gearing toward defensive stocks has played well this year as investors seek a shelter from Trump-induced volatility. There is also a lot of anecdotal evidence that it has benefited from some investors taking their money outside the U.S. — something that was particularly evident in the first four months of the year and summed up in the expression, which first appeared in the Wall Street Journal on May 19, the ‘ABUSA (Anywhere But USA) trade’.

And there have been important boosts for individual sectors, most notably defense, following commitments from a number of Western governments to raise defense spending.

Rolls-Royce, the aircraft engine manufacturer which also has a substantial defense business, has seen its shares rise by 75% so far this year. BAE Systems , the U.K.’s biggest defense contractor, is up 59% since the beginning of the year. The pair are now respectively the sixth and 11th biggest companies in the index.

Specific elements on the day the Footsie hit its most recent record last week included strong earnings updates from a host of constituents, most notably Reckitt, the household products group; Howden Joinery, the kitchen and joinery supplier and Lloyds Banking Group.

Even BT, a serial disappointment, rose sharply after quarterly results proved no worse than expected. That day also saw a decline in the pound — a factor that often benefits the index because Footsie constituents derive four-fifths of their earnings overseas, mainly in U.S. dollars and euros.

This was a point not greatly appreciated by some investors until the U.K. voted to leave the EU on June 23, 2016, and the pound fell by 10% against the greenback in a matter of hours.

Initially, the Footsie fell sharply, in line with other U.K. assets. However, as realization dawned that a weaker pound translates into higher earnings from overseas revenues, the index rallied and, a week later, it was some 2.6% higher than it had been before the referendum.

And this, in turn, leads to probably the most significant fact lost on many ordinary British investors. The Footsie is commonly perceived to be a barometer of U.K. economic — and, certainly, corporate — health.

Globalization

The truth is that it is not in the slightest bit reflective of the U.K. economy. Yes, there are some companies — BT and Lloyds being good examples — that derive the majority of their earnings in the U.K.

However, the Footsie is also packed with companies that do little or no business in the U.K., such as Antofagasta, a Chilean copper miner; Fresnillo, a Mexican silver miner; Mondi, a global leader in paper and packaging with 100 production sites around the world but none in Britain; and Ashtead Group, a plant and tool hire company that derives more than 90% of its earnings from the U.S., where it trades under the name Sunbelt Rentals — the name it will take when it moves its primary stock listing early in 2026.

Even a number of businesses traditionally seen as quintessentially British to the extent that they have (or have had) the word in their company moniker, such as BP, BAE Systems and British American Tobacco, derive the majority of their earnings outside the U.K.

Of the 20 biggest companies in the Footsie, only Lloyds Banking Group and NatWest Group, another lender, make the majority of their earnings in the U.K.

It did not always used to be this way.

At its launch, 41 years ago, the Footsie was full of companies that made the majority, if not all, of their sales and profits in the U.K., including a clutch of domestically oriented brewing, pub and hotel operators in Scottish & Newcastle, Bass, Whitbread, Grand Metropolitan and Allied Lyons; two flat pack furniture and joinery companies in Magnet & Southerns and MFI; and a whole host of then U.K.-focused retailers, including Burton Group, House of Fraser, Sears (no relation to the U.S. retailer of the same name), British Home Stores, Marks & Spencer and Great Universal Stores.

With globalization yet to take off — this was, of course, before the fall of the Berlin Wall — even those financial services companies in the Footsie were largely domestically focused, including the insurers Commercial Union and General Accident (now both part of Aviva Group), Prudential and Sun Life and lenders such as Royal Bank of Scotland, Midland Bank (now part of HSBC) and Barclays, which was yet to embark on its push into the wholesale and investment banking activities with which it is most closely associated these days.

At its birth, the Footsie contained only a handful of companies that could be regarded as genuinely international in scope, including a couple which dated back to the old British Empire: Consolidated Gold Fields, founded in South Africa in 1887 by the imperialist Cecil Rhodes and Harrisons & Crosfield, now the specialty chemicals company Elementis but then best known for owning Malaysian rubber plantations.

Then came globalization and, with it down the years, a string of IPOs of foreign companies, particularly from South Africa, wishing to tap into London’s more liquid capital markets.

In being so internationally focused, the Footsie is no different from the DAX-40, whose members derive around four-fifths of their earnings from outside Germany or the CAC-40, whose constituents make around three-quarters of their earnings from outside France.

But it certainly should not be taken as a barometer of corporate Britain’s health — however good it makes some of us feel on days when it hits new highs.