Oil Heads For Third Monthly Decline As Strong Dollar, Ample Supply Weigh

The much-awaited meeting between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday concluded with significant decisions on trade, soybeans, and resources.The two leaders met at the sidelines of the APEC summit in Busan, South Korea. The first in-person meeting between the two since Trump's second term began in January, for about an hour and 40 minutes.

Reduced Fentanyl Tariffs, Soybean And Rare Earth Deal

Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One about the reduction in fentanyl tariffs from 20% to 10%. The reduced fentanyl tariffs will take effect immediately, lowering the levy on Chinese exports to 47% from 57%. Trump still called the subject of fentanyl very "complex" and expressed confidence that Xi would "work hard" to stop the related deaths.

In exchange, Beijing has pledged to step up measures against fentanyl trafficking and restart imports of "tremendous amounts" of U.S. soybeans and other agricultural goods, as per Trump. He also appreciated China's gesture to resume "large quantities" of soybean imports.The President also said that the U.S. and China have reached an agreement on rare earths and critical minerals. Rare earth issue "has been settled," Trump stated, adding that the agreement will be renegotiated annually.

Nvidia Talks Does Not Include Blackwell

Trump said he had discussed the sale of Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) chips to China with President Xi, adding that it was now up to Beijing to continue talks with the company. "That's really between you and Nvidia," Trump is said to have told the Chinese president.However, he clarified that the discussion did not cover the sale of Nvidia's latest Blackwell chips to China.

Trade Deal 'Pretty Soon'

When asked about signing the trade deal with China, Trump replied, "pretty soon." He added, "We have not too many major stumbling blocks."Trump also announced plans to visit China in April, adding that Xi is expected to make a return visit to the U.S., though no specific dates were provided. Overall, he called the meeting "amazing" and rated it a "12 out of 10," emphasizing the positive outcomes and agreements reached.

Geopolitical Issues Discussed

Trump also noted that Taiwan was not part of the talks, but the topic of Ukraine was discussed extensively. He emphasized that the U.S. is willing to work with China toward resolving the conflict.

Xi Willing To Work With Trump

Xi said China's growth aligns with Trump's vision to "Make America Great Again," emphasizing that "China and the U.S. should be partners and friends," as reported by China Daily.He added that both nations are "fully able to help each other succeed and prosper together" and expressed readiness to work with Trump to "build a solid foundation for China-U.S. relations and create a sound atmosphere for the development of both countries."

Source: Yahoo Finance

Tucked into President Donald Trump's trade deals formalizing higher tariffs on goods from Asia this week are provisions for a global economic frontier the US wants to stay free of protectionism: digital commerce.In deals with Malaysia and Cambodia, and a more preliminary agreement with Thailand, the White House received assurances none will impose digital services taxes or discriminate against American providers of e-commerce, social media, streaming, cloud storage or other types of online services. Those activities count as digital trade when the transactions cross national borders.

While Trump wields tariffs to rebalance US deficits in merchandise trade, his push for a global internet free of import duties and other surcharges is aimed at ensuring the world's largest economy remains the leading net exporter of e-services. That stands in contrast with the prior administration under Joe Biden, which was more sympathetic to European officials' concerns about unfettered access to markets for US tech giants including Alphabet Inc.'s Google, Meta Platforms Inc. and Amazon.com Inc."The Trump administration believes that our deficit in trade in goods has been unfairly imposed, but that our surplus in trade in services has been fairly earned" and wants to "maintain our services surplus, while reducing our goods deficit," said Anupam Chander, a professor of law and technology at Georgetown Law in Washington. "I could understand why other countries would feel that this is itself unfair."

Last year, global exports of digitally delivered services increased to more than $4.77 trillion, a nearly 10% jump from 2023 and more than double the growth in total goods and services trade, according to World Trade Organization and United Nations figures. It's the fastest-growing segment of global goods and services trade that reached about $33 trillion last year.

Supercharging digital trade is artificial intelligence, raising questions for officials concerned about national security, data sovereignty, intellectual property abuse and consumer privacy protections as online services flow unchecked across borders.For some nations, it means a loss of government revenue as items formerly shipped as goods – a book or a movie, for example – are now sent digitally and out of reach of traditional customs duties.As Trump tries to rewire the global trading system, digital commerce has become another battleground for geopolitical fragmentation where Washington and Beijing are jockeying for influence across Africa, Latin America and South Asia.

China's DeepSeek Is Beating Out OpenAI and Google in Africa

The new US provisions for Malaysia, Cambodia and Thailand stand out because they call for long-term acceptance of an agreement forged at the WTO calling on all countries to refrain from putting tariffs on digital services.All three Southeast Asian economies agreed to support a permanent extension of the WTO accord known as the "moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions."Aside from that initiative and another aimed at protecting fisheries, Washington has abandoned the WTO – the referee of the rules-based trading system for the past 30 years - in favor of Trump's unilateral approach with so-called reciprocal tariffs.

The WTO moratorium has been extended by consensus every two years since 1998, most recently in 2024 when it only was approved in a last-minute deal held up by objections from India. It comes up for renewal again heading into the Geneva-based organization's ministerial meeting in March 2026 in Cameroon."The commitments in the US deals to facilitate the free flow of data are absolutely welcome – especially when set against the trend for localization requirements that we've seen in recent years," said Andrew Wilson, deputy secretary-general for policy at the International Chamber of Commerce. "While country-by-country progress is valuable, the ultimate goal should be to anchor these norms in a new international deal."

Malaysia's accord with Trump included the additional concession that it will refrain from "requiring US social media platforms and cloud service providers to pay into Malaysia's domestic fund."

AI Data Center Boom Threatens Trump's Manufacturing Revival

The latest digital pacts by the US – plus a preliminary one with Vietnam that contains a vague pledge to finalize digital services commitments — follow a framework the US announced in July with Indonesia, whose customs agency had preemptively added a line for digital services in its harmonized tariff schedule, or HTS.That deal specified that "Indonesia has committed to eliminate existing HTS tariff lines on 'intangible products' and suspend related requirements on import declarations," according to the White House document.

Under Trump, the US push for a permanent extension will have to address concerns from Brazil and India, both of which have faced some of the steepest US tariffs. In the past, both have wanted to preserve the option of raising revenue from foreign tech companies and protecting domestic e-commerce companies. Keeping the moratorium renewable also gave them leverage in other areas of trade."That extension looked very shaky after the last ministerial conference," said Simon Evenett, a professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD Business School in St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Still, he said, while the US uses its leverage to push for a permanent extension of the moratorium, "it's too soon to say this represents broad-based WTO re-engagement — more likely, it's selective engagement on a topic critical to US big tech."Digital services provisions are part of most modern trade agreements, though the US and European Union have different views on the need for openness.Officials in Brussels want safeguards against anti-competitive behavior and stricter data privacy protections — oversight that US officials consider over-regulation. Some European countries have annoyed Washington by imposing taxes on digital services, viewing such moves as domestic fiscal policy that's outside the scope of trade talks. French lawmakers earlier this week voted to double a tax on large technology companies, risking a backlash from Trump.

The US-EU trade framework dated Aug. 21 noted both sides "commit to address unjustified digital trade barriers" and will together pursue a permanent WTO's e-commerce moratorium.Martina Ferracane, an associate professor of international digital trade at Teesside University in the UK, said another temporary extension is likelier than a permanent one because the US administration has "weakened its credibility" to lead a global consensus on the issue.She cited Trump's pledge to put 100% tariffs on films made outside the US as an example of a "threat of non-compliance" with the international ban on tariffs on digital commerce.

Source: Bloomberg Europe

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell surprised many market-watchers on Wednesday when he declared that another interest rate cut in December was not a slam dunk. Perhaps even more surprising was his apparent suggestion that if boosting the labor market is the goal, rate cuts might not be that useful.In the press conference after the central bank lowered its fed funds policy target range by 25 basis points, Powell cited several reasons why a similar move in December is "far from" a done deal. These included "strongly different" views among rate-setters, limited data visibility due to the government shutdown, above-target inflation, and doubts about how quickly the labor market is slowing. He also noted that policy may be close to neutral after 150 basis points of easing.

But perhaps the most telling reason was the most simple: cutting rates won't work. At least, doing so won't address the current problem, which is supporting the softening labor market.

Alluding to this, Powell admitted that the job market is weakening primarily because of shrinking labor supply rather than cooling demand for workers.But lower borrowing costs are designed to boost demand for workers. If the job market's problems are "mostly" a function of labor supply, as Powell said, then cutting interest rates is akin to pushing on a string."So the question then is what does our tool do, which supports demand? Some people argue that this is supply, and we really can't affect it much with our tools. But others argue, as I do, that ... we should use our tools to support the labor market when we see this happening," Powell told reporters.

"It's a complicated situation."

Thomson ReutersUS payrolls breakeven estimates - Dallas Fed

Thomson ReutersNo jobs data

'K-SHAPED' ECONOMY

The current U.S. economic picture is indeed complicated.

Job growth has slowed in the U.S. over the past year, but this has been offset by a steep decline in the number of people looking for work. That's a result of the tighter immigration controls, increased deportations, and both young people and retirees leaving the labor force.In the last official monthly jobs report, which was for August, the unemployment rate climbed to a four-year high of 4.3%. But that's only one tenth of a percentage point up on the previous year, and is still ultra-low by historical standards.Powell also said there's no evidence of a worrisome deterioration in the broader labor market, though the recent announcement of some high-profile corporate layoffs may suggest otherwise.

At the same time, economic indicators such as business investment and retail sales still appear fairly healthy. Both are strongly linked to the booming stock market - big companies' rising share price and profits fund their capex, and the asset-owning top 10% continue to drive around half of all U.S. consumer spending.What we appear to see taking shape is a so-called 'K-shaped' economy: the rich are getting richer from the asset price boom, while the rest are struggling.This curious balance is new for the Fed and a tricky one to navigate, especially with the government shutdown reducing visibility even further.

Just as the Fed's blunt interest rate tool doesn't fix supply-side issues in the jobs market, it may not do much to support lower-income households and individuals either, even though ensuring a stronger labor market is the "best thing" the Fed can do for the American people.Cheaper money is also likely to benefit the richest cohorts by inflating asset prices even more, which may also push already lofty valuations to unsustainable levels.Six weeks is a long way off, but a third successive rate cut in December is suddenly in the balance. If the subtext of Powell's press conference is anything to go by, that may be for the best.

Source: TradingView

The Reserve Bank of Australia will keep its key interest rate unchanged at 3.60% on Tuesday as an inflation spike delays policy easing, according to economists in a Reuters poll who now expect the next and final rate cut in the cycle in 2026.Annual consumer price inflation jumped to 3.2% in the September quarter, above the top of the RBA's 2%–3% target band, driven by higher power and services costs.

The RBA's preferred core measure climbed 1.0% in the quarter, well above its forecast of near 0.6%. Governor Michele Bullock said on Monday even a 0.9% rise would be a "material miss" the board would need to weigh when deciding policy.The stronger-than-expected reading has effectively shut the door on any near-term rate cuts and cast doubt on how quickly the RBA can start easing. Markets have sharply scaled back expectations, now pricing in only one cut by mid-2026.All 34 economists surveyed October 29-30 - after the inflation data - expected the RBA to keep its official cash rate at 3.60% at the conclusion of its two-day meeting on November 4.

"The RBA was cutting because they could. They were normalizing policy because the inflation backdrop was giving them space to move rates away from more restrictive settings. The picture is now different," said Taylor Nugent, senior markets economist at NAB.Unemployment unexpectedly rose to a four-year high of 4.5% in September, but Nugent said inflation was more significant."Q3 inflation data is a pretty clear warning shot that maybe there is a bit more inflation pressure in the economy than they had earlier expected, and so we think they will be on hold for a while. Inflation is a much more important signal than the labour market in terms of the recent data flow."

Just over 90%, or 30 of 33 respondents who had forecasts beyond next week — including major local banks ANZ, CBA, NAB and Westpac — expect the RBA to keep rates unchanged in December.That marks a sharp shift from earlier this month, when three-quarters expected a cut by year-end and almost all predicted rates at 3.10% or lower by end-March 2026. Now, just under half see them falling to 3.35% or below by then.Median forecasts showed one more rate cut by end-June, taking the cash rate to 3.35%. However, economists were divided — 12 predicted rates at 3.35%, six saw them at 3.10%, while 10 expected no change from 3.60%.

Rates were expected to be 3.35% at end-2026.

However, some economists warned if the labour market weakens further the RBA may be forced to cut rates more than markets anticipate."If the labour market cools more aggressively than expected, then inflation really isn't going to be the problem you need to worry about — it's going to be preserving the gains in the labour market, which has also been a stated aim of the RBA," said Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG Australia.

"Yes, you can rule out a November rate cut, but it doesn't mean we've seen the end of the easing cycle."

Source: Investing

Source: Bloomberg Europe

Source: CryptoSlate