No New Foreign Drones To Be Allowed In US Under FCC Rules

Community members bring flowers to a growing makeshift memorial outside the Barus & Holley building following a shooting at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, U.S. December 17, 2025. REUTERS/Taylor Coester

The U.S. Department of Education on Monday said it was reviewing safety at Brown University in response to a mass shooting on the campus earlier this month.

Federal officials will scrutinize Brown's emergency notification and campus surveillance systems, the department said in a statement. Almost a week after the shooting, the suspect - who also was accused of killing an MIT professor in the Boston area - was found dead.

Brown's president, Christina Paxson, has said her institution is "deeply committed" to campus safety and security. She has said one of her university's two emergency notification systems sent text messages and emails to 20,000 individuals after the shooting. She has also said that a second siren system was not set off for fear it would prompt people to rush for safety into the building where the shooting occurred.

Paxson also said last week the campus has 1,200 security cameras. Officials said the attack occurred in an older part of a facility that had few or no cameras.

President Donald Trump had previously criticized the university in a Truth Social post for having "so few Security Cameras."

The suspect, identified as Claudio Neves Valente, 48, entered a building used for Brown's engineering and physics programs on December 13 and fired at least 44 rounds from his 9 mm pistol, killing two students and wounding nine, according to police in Providence, Rhode Island.

He was found dead in a storage rental facility in Salem, New Hampshire, after a five-day manhunt.

The Education Department has ordered Brown to submit extensive records by January 30, including crime logs, annual security reports and internal protocols relating to emergency notifications and active shooter response.

The review will look at whether the school violated a law that requires universities to meet certain campus safety and security requirements as a condition of receiving federal student aid.

Source: Reuters

Members participating

Michele Bullock (Governor and Chair), Andrew Hauser (Deputy Governor and Deputy Chair),Marnie Baker AM, Renée Fry-McKibbin, Ian Harper AO, Carolyn Hewson AO,Iain Ross AO, Alison Watkins AM, Jenny Wilkinson PSM

Others participating

Sarah Hunter (Assistant Governor, Economic), Christopher Kent (Assistant Governor, FinancialMarkets)

Anthony Dickman (Secretary), David Norman (Deputy Secretary)

Meredith Beechey Osterholm (Head, Monetary Policy Strategy), Sally Cray (ChiefCommunications Officer), David Jacobs (Head, Domestic Markets Department), Michael Plumb (Head,Economic Analysis Department), Penelope Smith (Head, International Department)

Financial conditions

Members commenced their discussion of financial conditions by reviewing developments in advanced economyequity markets. Market sentiment had deteriorated briefly amid concerns about elevated valuations,especially for global technology companies. Equity prices had fallen for a period but there had been asubsequent rebound in many countries. In the United States, this partly reflected expectations ofadditional monetary policy easing. However, the decline in Australian equity prices had been morepersistent than in other markets, reflecting a shift higher in the expected path for the cash rate and areappraisal of valuations in some market segments. Corporate bond yields had increased in some countries,but spreads to government bond yields remained low across the world. Members observed that investors inequity and corporate bond markets continued to price in a benign global economic and financial outlookand appeared willing to accept low levels of compensation for the risk of weaker outcomes.

Members noted that financial market participants expected the US Federal Reserve to cut its policy rate atits 10 December meeting, and to continue easing policy in 2026 as the immediate impacts of highertariffs and prior fiscal stimulus waned. By contrast, the European Central Bank was not expected to cutrates further and the next move in policy rates in Canada, New Zealand, Sweden and Australia was expectedto be up. The Bank of Japan was expected to continue gradually raising its policy rate amid persistentinflationary pressures.

Members discussed the rise in market-implied expectations for the policy rate in Australia in more detail.They noted that expectations had moved significantly higher in prior months, but the pick-up had beenrelatively smooth and progressive as a sequence of data releases showed the domestic outlook hadstrengthened and risks to the global economy had receded. That trend had continued since the previousmeeting, as markets moved from pricing in a further 25 basis point cut in the cash rate by the endof 2026 to pricing in a 25 basis point increase. Members noted that this latest shift was inresponse to both communication by the RBA and the release of data on inflation, the labour market andGDP. These data had been interpreted by markets as suggesting that capacity constraints and inflationarypressures were building.

Trends in long-term sovereign bond yields had broadly mirrored shifts in policy rate expectations inAustralia and abroad. Sovereign bond yields had declined in the United States in prior months but hadincreased in Japan, Germany, Canada and Australia. In Japan, the increase in bond yields was inanticipation of both fiscal stimulus and further monetary policy tightening by the Bank of Japan. Membersnoted that the rise in short-term bond yields in Australia was consistent with market participantsexpecting both a tighter outlook for monetary policy and higher inflation in the near term. However,market measures of long-term inflation expectations had remained anchored and consistent with theinflation target, implying that investors expected the Board would respond as needed to the evolvinginflation outlook.

In China, total social financing had continued to rise faster than nominal GDP. This was driven largely bygovernment borrowing, including because of efforts to shift debt from local government financing vehiclesto local governments. Household demand for credit remained very weak, reflecting ongoing concerns aboutthe property market.

Members turned to considering the extent to which current Australian financial conditions wererestrictive. Taken together, the incoming data had reduced their confidence in their earlier assessmentthat monetary policy was still a little restrictive.

Members considered model-based estimates of the neutral cash rate, which reflect data on inflation, thelabour market and bond yields. These implied that the cash rate was now around the average of the centralestimate of its neutral level from the full suite of models maintained by RBA staff. Members acknowledgedthat model estimates of the neutral cash rate were subject to considerable estimation error and providedno direct guide to monetary policy.

Members therefore assessed the implications for financial conditions from a range of other indicators. Thepicture remained somewhat mixed but was consistent with a further easing in conditions over the precedingmonth. Extra mortgage payments were still at a high level and the aggregate household savings ratio washigher than its pre-pandemic average, both of which were consistent with monetary policy being a littletight. However, demand for credit had picked up significantly and household credit was now growing inline with disposable incomes, following a period in which households had deleveraged. This was mostnotable for housing credit to investors, which tends to be more responsive to interest rate cuts thanhousing credit to owner-occupiers. Growth in business debt had also remained strong and business debtrelative to GDP had risen to be around pre-pandemic levels.

Members noted that the Australian dollar had appreciated only a little since the November meeting, despitethe significant rise in the average interest rate differential between Australia and major advancedeconomies. Members observed that the limited response of the exchange rate to interest rate differentialswas potentially contributing to easier financial conditions than otherwise. However, the real exchangerate had appreciated over preceding years, implying a decline in international competitiveness.

Economic conditions

Members began their discussion of economic conditions by considering trends in inflation. They noted thata range of data received since the November meeting pointed to the possibility that inflationarypressures could be a little more persistent than had been previously assessed.

Members welcomed the inaugural release of the complete monthly CPI. The new data showed that headlineinflation over the year to October had increased to 3.8 per cent. Some of that increasereflected the cessation of government electricity rebates for some households; members noted that allfederal and state government electricity rebates would cease by early 2026. Inflation for items such asnew dwelling costs and market services had remained elevated, as expected by the staff at the time of theNovember projections. However, inflation of durable goods prices had exceeded expectations and inflationof domestic travel prices, which can be volatile, was elevated. Overall, the data suggested some upsiderisk to the outlook for underlying inflation in the near term, and it was likely that headline inflationwould exceed the November forecasts in the near term.

Members noted that it would take time to understand the properties of the new monthly CPI data.Furthermore, as the November Statement had set out, monthly data are inherently morevolatile than quarterly data, and the difficulty of seasonally adjusting some components at a monthlyfrequency (owing to their short history) would make the trimmed mean and other measures of the underlyingmonthly inflation rate less reliable for a period. As a result, the staff would continue to relyprimarily on the quarterly CPI – which has a much longer history and well-understood properties– for a while to assess the underlying momentum in inflation. Members noted that inflation data forthe December quarter would be available prior to the February meeting.

Members discussed a range of other data that were also signalling higher inflationary pressures. Thesedata included various price measures from the recently released national accounts. Growth in averageearnings and unit labour costs had risen in the September quarter and were stronger than had beenexpected. Model-based estimates of capacity pressures in the economy had been revised higher, and the NABbusiness survey measures of capacity utilisation had also increased since the middle of the year.

By contrast, the Wage Price Index (WPI) measure of wages growth had been broadly steady in recent quarters(after adjusting for administered wage decisions). Higher public sector wages growth had been offsettingan easing in private sector wages growth in the WPI, which had declined to its lowest rate since 2021.

Members considered what a broader range of indicators implied about balance in the labour market. Theincrease in the unemployment rate recorded in September had been unwound in October. Other measures oflabour underutilisation also remained at low levels. Information from business surveys and liaisoncontinued to suggest that a significant share of firms were experiencing difficulty sourcing labour.Members were presented with some refinements to how labour market indicators were being incorporated intothe staff's assessment of conditions relative to full employment. These refinements included:reviewing which labour market indicators provided the best information to assess full employment;improving the way in which cyclical movements are identified; and strengthening the methodology foraggregating this information to inform an assessment of the extent of labour market tightness. Membersnoted that the results from this new analysis provided additional support for the staff's existingassessment that labour market conditions remained a little tight, rather than changing it significantly.The framework will be outlined in the February 2026 Statement.

Turning to momentum in the economy, members noted that year-ended GDP growth had picked up in theSeptember quarter to around the staff's estimate of potential growth, as had been expected inNovember. The composition of growth had also continued to shift from public to private demand. Membersnoted that the 1.2 per cent increase in private demand had been much stronger than theexpectation of 0.5 per cent at the time of the November Statement, but the impactof this on overall GDP growth had been somewhat offset by a large and unexpected drawdown of mininginventories, and increased imports. Much of the unexpected strength in private demand was driven byinvestment in components that can be volatile from quarter to quarter and which are largely imported.However, members noted that investment in data centres (one component of the strength in the quarter) waslikely to continue in the coming years and observed that, in turn, this could stimulate additionalinfrastructure investment. Momentum in dwelling investment also appeared to be rising and members notedthat data revisions meant household incomes now appeared higher than previously recorded. Membersobserved that, while the easing in monetary policy since the beginning of the year had certainly begun tosupport conditions in the private sector, the bulk of the effect on activity was expected to be seen in2026, helping to offset the decline in other drivers of growth. Business surveys also supported theexpectation that the recovery in private demand would be sustained. Members noted that this, in turn,would support labour demand.

In the global economy, members noted that production and trade had been relatively resilient overpreceding months and were again a little stronger than expected. The likelihood of a significanttariff-related slowdown in global growth had continued to recede, partly reflecting fiscal and monetarypolicy support in some economies and a significant realignment of trade flows. Very strong investment inthe United States associated with artificial intelligence and new technologies more broadly had also beenan important contributor to global economic activity. By contrast, fixed asset investment in China hadbeen very weak. While the staff's central forecast remained that Chinese authorities would providethe necessary stimulus to meet their GDP growth target, concerns persisted around excess capacity in somesectors of the Chinese economy and how that would be resolved.

Considerations for monetary policy

Turning to considerations for the monetary policy decision, members highlighted three judgements that werecentral to their decision at this meeting: first, the extent to which aggregate demand exceeds potentialsupply, and the implications of this for the persistence of the recent pick-up in inflation; second, theoutlook for growth in labour demand and economic activity; and, third, whether financial conditions werestill restrictive. Given the inherent uncertainty around each of these, members considered both theircentral outlook and whether their distribution of risks around the outlook had shifted.

Regarding inflation, members noted that the September quarter CPI release had been well above the forecastpublished in the August Statement. Moreover, the detail within the October monthly CPI datapointed to the possibility that inflation in the December quarter could also be higher than had beenexpected in the November forecast. Members noted that a range of other data from the national accountswere suggesting the possibility of a more broad-based pick-up in cost and price inflation: averageearnings growth had been strong; unit labour costs had continued to grow quite quickly; and output priceinflation was above its historical average.

At the same time, members noted several reasons to be cautious about how much signal to draw from thesedata. There was uncertainty around the extent to which the recent pick-up in the CPI inflation dataacross several components would be sustained. Members also noted that both average earnings and unitlabour costs are typically quite volatile and had been influenced by some one-off factors in theSeptember quarter. These considerations all suggested that it was prudent to be cautious beforeextrapolating recent strength in inflation too far into the future.

Turning to the outlook for the labour market, members noted that the rise in the unemployment ratereported at the November meeting had since unwound. They agreed that this had reduced the risk of amaterial easing in labour market conditions. Future labour demand was expected to be supported to someextent by the recovery in private economic activity. Members pointed to the various signs that suggestedthe lift in private demand would be sustained, including upward revisions to firms' capitalexpenditure expectations. Members discussed the continued presence of downside risks emanating from theworld economy and global asset valuations, but noted that global growth and trade had proven materiallystronger than had been expected. Moreover, the risks to the outlook no longer appeared as pronounced asearlier in the year.

Regarding the extent of excess demand, members judged that the recent data and analysis by the staffsupported greater confidence in their judgement that the labour market was still a little tight and theoutput gap still positive. Indeed, there was some risk that capacity constraints in the labour marketcould prove tighter than expected, especially if the recovery in activity strengthened further. Inrelation to the output gap, members observed that recent data on inflation and output growth had resultedin a rise in model-based estimates of excess demand. Members highlighted the independent signal from theNAB survey's indicator of capacity utilisation, which also suggested that capacity constraints hadincreased further above historical averages. Members noted that the forecasts from the NovemberStatement had been consistent with the output gap being broadly stable over the coming twoyears, so these developments posed some upside risk to that outlook. They acknowledged, however, thatsome other economic forecasters were more optimistic about the potential growth rate of the economy.

Turning to their judgement about the stance of monetary policy, members agreed that there were conflictingsignals about whether financial conditions were still restrictive or not, and it was not possible to beconfident in any assessment. Some members judged that, on balance, financial conditions were perhaps nolonger restrictive. These members placed a reasonable weight on signs that banks were competingaggressively to lend, risk premia in capital markets were low and the response in the housing market topolicy easing earlier in the year had been quite marked. Other members assessed that, on balance,financial conditions were a little restrictive. These members placed more emphasis on the fact that theunemployment rate had drifted up over 2025. Members acknowledged that the full impact of the easing inmonetary policy through 2025 was yet to be seen. However, government bond yields had risen materially inprior months and it would be important to evaluate the impact of those changes in the February 2026forecasts.

Members expressed their concerns about the recent trend in inflation, the risk it could be more persistentthan currently assessed and the potential for that persistence, if it crystallised, to contribute to anenvironment in which price increases are more readily accepted and households' purchasing powercomes under further pressure. They noted that the November forecast already projected underlyinginflation to remain above the midpoint of the target range until 2027, albeit on the assumption that thecash rate followed the November market path, which envisaged further easing in monetary policy. Membersnoted that the economy appeared to be operating with a degree of excess demand and it was not clearwhether financial conditions were sufficiently restrictive to bring aggregate demand and supply back tobalance. Members discussed the circumstances in which, should these trends persist, an increase in thecash rate might need to be considered at some point in the coming year.

However, members judged that it was too early to determine whether inflation would be more persistent thanthey had assumed in November, given the uncertainties about the reliability of the signal from the newdata series at present. If financial conditions were still slightly restrictive, and evidence emergedthat a material part of the apparent renewed pick-up in inflationary pressures reflected volatile ortemporary factors, then holding the cash rate at its current level for some time may be sufficient tokeep the economy close to balance. It was also important to evaluate the impact of the recent materialrise in market rates at both shorter and longer term maturities. Overall, therefore, while recent datasuggested the risks to inflation had tilted to the upside, members felt it would take a little longer toassess the persistence of inflationary pressures. As a result, they agreed it was appropriate to leavethe cash rate target unchanged at this meeting and assess at future meetings how their judgements aboutthe key considerations had evolved.

In finalising its statement, the Board agreed to continue to be attentive to the data and the evolvingassessment of the outlook when making its decisions. The Board will remain focused on its mandate todeliver price stability and full employment and will do what it considers necessary to achieve thatoutcome.

The decision

The Board decided unanimously to leave the cash rate target unchanged at 3.60 per cent.

More on the December 2025 monetary policy decision...

Monetary Policy Board Statement

At its meeting today, the Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 3.60 per cent.

Media Conference

Governor Michele Bullock addresses the media after the monetary policy decision.

Source: RBA

Oil held a four-day gain as the US continued its blockade of shipments of crude from Venezuela.

West Texas Intermediate traded near $58 a barrel, after gaining about 5% in the past four sessions, while Brent closed near $62. President Donald Trump said the US will keep the oil from seized ships linked to Venezuela.

The US has taken control of two oil tankers and is still in pursuit of a third, as Trump intensifies pressure on Nicolás Maduro's government. Still, more than a dozen tankers have loaded oil off Venezuela's coast since the US administration ramped up efforts to curb Caracas' crude revenue.

The geopolitical tensions, including the threat of US land strikes against drug operations in Latin America, have helped lift oil. Nevertheless, prices have fallen almost 20% this year — on track for the biggest annual drop since 2020 — as increasing supply outpaces demand growth, leading to a glut.

Source: Bloomberg Europe

A judge ruled that President Donald Trump's administration must arrange for the return of a group of alleged Venezuelan gang members deported to a prison in El Salvador.

US District Judge James Boasberg ruled that about 137 men sent in March to the notorious CECOT prison deserve to return to the US to contest in court how they were designated for removal without due process under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. Boasberg said the government must "facilitate" their return and submit a plan within two weeks.

Boasberg declared Monday that the men "should not have been removed in the manner that they were, with virtually no notice and no opportunity to contest the bases of their removal, in clear contravention of their due-process rights." Even though the men were later sent to Venezuela, he said, the court continued to have jurisdiction over them.

As a result, the US must "undo the effects of their unlawful removal by facilitating a meaningful opportunity to contest their designation" as alien enemies under a law previously used only in wartime, and the validity of Trump's proclamation invoking that statute, Boasberg ruled.

Boasberg has clashed repeatedly with Trump's administration since he unsuccessfully ordered the return of planes carrying suspected gang members to the prison on March 15. The planes proceeded anyway, and the US Supreme Court upheld his ruling that the detainees should have had notice and a chance to make their case to a judge before they were deported.

The judge has also investigated whether Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and others were in contempt of court for the Venezuelan deportations. But the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit temporarily halted hearings he had scheduled to start Dec. 15 after the US argued he has no constitutional authority to proceed and compel testimony from current and former government attorneys. The panel said it's still reviewing the case.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Source: Bloomberg Europe

South Korea's National Security Adviser Wi Sung-lac affirmed good ties with senior Japanese cabinet members during discussions held in Tokyo, ahead of a visit by President Lee Jae Myung to Japan expected early next year.

Wi spoke with Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara and Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi in two separate meetings on Monday. Wi confirmed with both Kihara and Motegi the importance of a forward-looking and stable development of ties between Seoul and Tokyo, and agreed that the governments will continue to work together closely, according to statements from Japan's Foreign Ministry.

Motegi also said that Japan and South Korea are important neighbors and should work together on various international issues as partners, and pointed to the increasing importance of cooperation not only between Japan and South Korea, but also trilaterally with the US as the security environment becomes increasingly tense, according to the statement.

Local media have reported that preparations are underway for Lee to visit Japan in mid-January to meet with Japan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi. Some reports have said the meeting may take place in Takaichi's native prefecture of Nara, in western Japan.

A meeting between the leaders in January would happen as relations between Tokyo and Seoul remain stable after a warming of ties in 2023, when the two governments agreed to put their differences, including various wartime compensation issues, behind them to cultivate a forward-looking relationship.

Japan and South Korea have a long history of tension dating back to Japan's annexation of South Korea, which ended in 1945 with Japan's surrender in World War Two. Lingering disputes over wartime issues have flared at times, overshadowing cooperation between the two nations.

The meeting would happen as a dispute between the region's two biggest economies, Japan and China, shows no signs of abating after Takaichi's comments on a possible Taiwan contingency incurred the wrath of Beijing.

Source: Bloomberg Europe

JPMorgan Chase & Co. has reclaimed its top spot in India's equity offerings for the first time in five years, seizing the lead from Kotak Mahindra Capital Co. in one of the world's busiest fundraising markets.

The Wall Street bank's market share has nearly doubled from a year ago to more than 11%, after it was credited with 537 billion rupees ($6 billion) in equity offerings in 2025, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. It climbed up four spots after advising on stake sale in some of the largest block trades this year, including stake sale in telecom firm Bharti Airtel Ltd. and IndiGo operator InterGlobe Aviation Ltd.

"We invested well in advance rather than waiting for the market to expand," said Abhinav Bharti, head of equity capital markets at JPMorgan India. The bank has beefed up the size of its investment banking team to the biggest among global players in the nation, with a record boom in deals likely extending into coming years, he said.

The return of a foreign bank as the top arranger comes as the pipeline of offerings expands, with companies raising nearly $55 billion this year from listings, share placements and block trades. Domestic banks still dominate first-time equity sales, which have hit record levels on strong inflows from local mutual funds and retail investors, while global banks are being favored for bulk trades typically placed with foreign institutional investors.

Citigroup Inc. is the second-biggest arranger of deals in India in 2025 with a 9.6% market share, while Kotak slipped to the third spot after leading the charts for three straight years. The shift signals global banks' ability to leverage their international network, balance-sheet capacity and cross-border execution.

While Kotak's deal value was lower than JPMorgan, it arranged a higher number of offerings than any other bank during the year, including Tata Capital Ltd.'s $1.7 billion IPO and Hexaware Technologies Ltd.'s billion-dollar share sale, underscoring the dominance of domestic players in primary issuances.

"If you remove block deals, we are much much ahead of our competitor," said V Jayasankar, managing director at Kotak. The bank is focused on large-cap IPOs of over 50 billion rupees and has a significant share in the mid-cap space, he said.

Among other banks, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and HSBC Holdings Plc also climbed up the rankings as they stepped up their India presence to capture the rising deal flow. Jefferies Group and Morgan Stanley slipped in the league table.

Source: Bloomberg Europe