XRP Price Prediction For This Week (May 6 To May 12, 2025)

Cryptocurrency

Summary:

XRP has seen some ups and downs recently, but analysts believe it may be getting ready for a bigger move soon.

XRP has seen some ups and downs recently, but analysts believe it may be getting ready for a bigger move soon. This week, XRP dropped slightly by about 0.3%. While some cryptocurrencies saw a bit of selling, this small dip in XRP isn’t a big concern for most investors. The price is still holding above key support levels.

There’s still uncertainty about whether XRP has started its next big move up. On smaller timeframes, no clear breakout has formed yet, though the price is making higher highs and higher lows — a positive sign.

Price Correction Could Be Ending

Crypto analyst Dark Defender said that XRP recently faced resistance at $2.22 and $2.36, with the price pulling back to $2.13. He believes this pullback was expected and that the market is preparing for the next move up, as long as XRP holds above the $2.00 level.

Dark Defender also shared his long-term outlook. He said XRP is in the final phase of a fifth wave structure and expects this to lead to higher prices. He predicts the first move toward $3, followed by further gains with targets of $4.40 and $6.30 if the pattern continues. The key support to watch in the short term is $1.88.

However, some analysts warn that short-term trends are still unclear. The recent price movement has been choppy, and there is no strong sign of an upward impulse yet. A confirmed move above $2.25 would help signal that a new rally is underway.

Source: CryptoSlate

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Adam

Economic

Earnings have been strong. Not everyone’s happy about it.

Nearly three-quarters of S&P 500 companies had turned in first-quarter results through Friday, according to FactSet, which in a note last week said that earnings for the index as a whole are on track—based on a “blended” number that reflects numbers already reported and Wall Street’s expectations for those that remain—to rise nearly 13% year-over-year.1

Still, some investors are wary. Investors have so far bid up shares of companies that have reported guidance better than the Street expected, according to Bank of America research, but companies have been rewarded less than is typical for stronger-than-expected results, and misses have been more harshly punished than in recent years.2

The percentage of companies beating earnings estimates, meanwhile, is higher than the historical average, but that of sales beats is lower, Bank of America said.

Many companies are withdrawing forecasts entirely. One of the latest examples came today: engine maker Cummins (CMI), which cited uncertainty about the direction of Trump administration trade policy. (Other companies have taken another tack, offering up outlooks that take into account a range of economic scenarios.)

“Companies are getting nervous about the future—so much so that they’re pulling earnings forecasts in droves,” wrote Callie Cox, chief market strategist at Ritholtz Wealth Management, in a Monday email.

Even those that aren’t withdrawing forecasts are being cautious, Goldman Sachs analysts wrote last week, while observing that an above-average share of companies that have offered full-year guidance have kept previously issued numbers in place.3

“We view this dynamic partly as a reflection of [companies’] hesitancy to shift guidance due to uncertainty around tariff policy,” they wrote. “For example, some companies noted in their earnings calls that their most recent guidance does not incorporate the impact of tariffs.”

That could spell trouble in the months ahead, especially if companies are spending now to get ahead of the effects of tariffs later.

“In our reading, a combination of pre-buying and inventory rundowns should give companies a buffer of about 1 to 2 months before the tariff impacts start to bite,” Deutsche Bank analysts wrote last week.4 "If sustained, we see the potential impact of the announced tariffs as large and likely to fall disproportionately on US companies.”

Source: investopedia

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Owen Li

Economic

Bessent, in prepared remarks to the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles, delivered a full-throated defense of Trump's tariffs but emphasized the Republican tax bill working its way through Congress, saying it would make many parts of the president's first-term tax cuts permanent, including a deduction for small businesses.

"The primary components of the Trump economic agenda - trade, tax cuts, and deregulation - are not standalone policies. They are interlocking parts of an engine designed to drive long-term investment in the American economy," Bessent said.

Bessent said that Trump's tariff blitz since taking office for a second time on January 20 was engineered to encourage companies like those attending the conference to invest in the U.S., build factories and make products in the U.S.

This effort would be rewarded with tax and deregulation benefits, Bessent said. Trump's tax legislation would provide tax credits and deductions for research and innovation into high-tech operations, restore 100% expensing for equipment while expanding this benefit to new factory construction to accelerate investment, he added.

"The result of the president's economic plan will be more. More jobs, more homes, more growth, more factories, more critical manufacturing plants, more semiconductors, more energy, more opportunity, more defense, more economic security, more innovation," Bessent said.

In a subsequent interview with CNBC television, Bessent said that he believed these policies could push U.S. growth close to 3% by this time next year, which would help to bring down U.S. budget deficits to their long-term average share of economic output.

The U.S. economy contracted for the first time in three years in the first quarter amid a flood of imports to beat Trump's tariffs, and the International Monetary Fund has forecast that U.S. GDP will grow only 1.8% in 2025.

GRADUALLY SHRINKING DEFICITS

He said the "smart way" to cut deficits was to reduce them by about $300 billion per year, noting that is equivalent to about 1 percentage point of the nearly $30 trillion U.S. economy.

"We're talking about bringing the deficit down by about 100 basis points every year for four years, (to) get us back to the long-term average of 3.5%," he said, referring to percentages of GDP. "And then a big cure for the deficit is upward growth shock."

He told the Milken conference that if deficit reduction can remove credit risk from U.S. Treasury debt, then interest rates "will naturally come down."

The Treasury chief said U.S. financial markets were well equipped to weather any short-term turbulence, citing their rebound from challenges over the past century, including the Great Depression, two World Wars, the September 11, 2001, attacks, the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent surge in inflation.

"Each time the American economy gets knocked down, it gets back up again. And it gets back up even stronger than it was before," Bessent said. "U.S. markets are anti-fragile. Indeed, the entirety of our economic history can be distilled in just five words: 'Up and to the right.'"

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Manuel

Bond

Forex

Bond investors have taken a neutral stance in the run-up to the Federal Reserve's two-day monetary policy meeting this week, reflecting continued caution over U.S. trade policy that threatens to plunge the world's largest economy into recession.

Fixed-income investors said they are either staying neutral relative to their benchmarks, reducing their long-duration exposure, or preferring to remain on the shorter end of the yield curve.

"We are sort of in this uneasy equilibrium between growing economic concerns as we see soft data sour a bit, but also the potential for policy shocks that could impact inflation outlooks and the deficit," said Chip Hughey, managing director of fixed income at Truist Advisory Services in Richmond, Virginia.

To be neutral means sticking to a portfolio's duration benchmark. For instance, if the benchmark duration is five years, a neutral position would suggest staying in fixed-income assets with five-year maturities or around that vicinity.

Duration, which is expressed in number of years, provides an indication on how far the bond's value will fall or rise when interest rates move. In general, when rates fall, higher-duration bonds experience a greater increase in value compared to those with lower duration.

Investors extended duration for most of 2024, believing at the time that the Fed would embark on a deep rate-cutting cycle. Long-duration bets typically involve buying longer-dated assets on expectations of a decline in yields.

On Wednesday, the U.S. central bank's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee is widely anticipated to keep its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range. Stronger-than-expected U.S. nonfarm payrolls data for April last Friday also gave the Fed some leeway to keep rates unchanged.

Since the Fed's last meeting in March, President Donald Trump's administration has introduced a massive trade shock that saw effective tariff rates surge, particularly on Chinese goods.

That fueled a U.S. Treasuries sell-off that, at one point, pushed benchmark 10-year yields more than 70 basis points (bps) higher to nearly 4.6% over the April 3-11 period. The U.S. 10-year yield is currently at 4.357%.

In his post-meeting press conference on Wednesday, Fed Chair Jerome Powell is likely to indicate that Trump's tariff shock could lead to higher inflation and an increase in unemployment, with recession not a far-fetched scenario.

NO PRE-EMPTIVE MOVE

"The Fed is unlikely to act pre-emptively given its expectation that inflation will be firming and the size of the tariff shock could produce persistent inflation effects," Morgan Stanley analysts led by chief U.S. economist Michael Gapen wrote in a research note.

Trump has walked back some of the U.S. tariffs since his self-declared "Liberation Day" on April 2, partly stabilizing bond and stock markets. But overall market anxiety over what will happen next has not dissipated, investors said.

"We're telling investors to continue to be cautious and de- risk," said Gregory Peters, co-chief investment officer at PGIM Fixed Income, which has assets under management of $837 billion.

"The way I see the tail is that there's only one side of the distribution: I don't see the upside tail. I think there's more of a centering around, from a yield-curve perspective, on the front end because at least that's driven by Fed policy," he said referring to his expectation that the economy will struggle with the Trump administration's tariff policy.

He added that the back end, specifically 30-year bonds, are "driven by factors that are well beyond my control and understanding."

The market, however, does not expect the Fed to leave rates unchanged much longer. The benchmark federal funds futures market has priced in a nearly 80% chance that the U.S. central bank will resume its rate cuts at its July 29-30 policy meeting, according to LSEG calculations.

All told, the market expects about 77 basis points of easing this year.

J.P. Morgan's latest Treasury client survey showed that 64% of the U.S. bank's clients are neutral, and 24% are net long overall. That net long position on Treasuries was down from a peak of 32% in the week of April 7, according to Jay Barry, head of global rates strategy at J.P. Morgan.

"We're currently neutral, leaning more on the front end of the curve where we have a little bit of comfort that it will be anchored toward Fed cuts going forward," said Anders Persson, chief investment officer and head of global fixed income at Nuveen in Charlotte, North Carolina.

"That's recognizing that given all the policy uncertainty, the backdrop of not a whole lot of clarity, that we're not all that comfortable making big bets."

Source: Reuter

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Stocks

Netflix (NFLX), Warner Bros. (WBD), and other media stocks fell Monday following President Trump's call for a 100% tariff on all foreign-produced films.

Stocks recouped steeper losses by mid-morning, although Netflix continued to lead the declines, down about 2%. Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global (PARA) slipped around 1% after also recovering from earlier session lows. Disney (DIS) traded flat.

The companies did not immediately respond to Yahoo Finance's request for comment.

The market reaction comes after Trump directed his administration late Sunday to impose "a 100% tariff on any and all movies coming into our country that are produced in foreign lands," sending shockwaves through an industry still reeling from the pandemic shutdown and the recent writers' and actors' strikes.

"The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death," Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. "Other Countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States. Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated. This is a concerted effort by other Nations and, therefore, a National Security threat."

Earlier this year, Trump appointed a trio of actors — Jon Voight, Sylvester Stallone, and Mel Gibson — as his "special ambassadors" to Hollywood. He introduced the initiative in January, describing Hollywood as “a great but very troubled place.”

Netflix, Warner Bros. stocks slide as Trump threatens 100% tariff on foreign-made films_1

'Insane and devastating'

Trump's announcement follows China's move to "moderately reduce" imports of Hollywood movies in retaliation for escalating US tariffs on Chinese goods.

The proposed tariffs could affect several blockbusters filmed abroad, including Disney's "Avengers: Doomsday" and "Spider-Man: Brand New Day" (London), 20th Century's "Avatar: Fire and Ash" (New Zealand), Paramount's "Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning" (global locations), Lionsgate's Ballerina (Czech Republic), and Lucasfilm's "Star Wars: Starfighter" (UK).

"Until there is more clarity, this new development — which should’ve been predicted by all Hollywood C-suites — will likely slow down the business, or, in a worst case, shut it down in exactly the same way that the strikes affected Hollywood," Chris Fenton, longtime Hollywood executive, told Yahoo Finance.

Veteran film producer Kathryn Arnold called the proposed tariffs "insane and devastating," warning they could wipe out lower to mid-budget films by driving up costs and disrupting a globally interconnected system.

"If films are forced to be made here, the pricing of labor and goods and services is higher. Budgets will go up," she said, noting US tax incentives aren’t nearly enough to offset domestic production costs.

The ripple effects, she added, would hit everyone from crew to catering.

International markets are vital for major releases, often contributing up to 70% of box office revenue. Prior to the pandemic, China alone accounted for up to 40%, though US studios typically only see about 25% of those grosses due to strict local revenue-sharing rules.

According to the Motion Picture Association, the US film and TV business is a net export business and is running a trade surplus, based on data collected through 2023.

Hollywood tariff unknowns

Despite the initial stock declines, many unknowns remain about how such a tariff rollout would be structured and what the implementation might look like. Some key questions include whether the tariffs would apply to all forms of distribution, including streaming platforms, or just theatrical releases.

It's also unclear how existing international co-productions would be treated. Industry insiders warn the policy could create logistical and legal complications for studios with global production pipelines.

"With only a single social media post to go on, [it's] virtually impossible to size the impact to the industry or specific companies today," Morgan Stanley analyst Ben Swinburne wrote in reaction to the news on Monday.

He warned 100% tariffs could result in fewer, more expensive films and lower industry earnings, particularly for Netflix, which produces more films than any other studio and derives up to 30% of its viewership from film content.

Swinburne also flagged potential retaliatory moves from foreign governments, which could target US streaming platforms or restrict film releases abroad.

Source: finance.yahoo

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Forex

President Trump’s tariff policy has distorted key US economic data and market trends. Tariff-driven activity inflated GDP and spending figures in early 2025, masking underlying weakness. Businesses and consumers rushed to purchase before new tariffs, creating artificial short-term growth. However, slowing labor indicators, rising inflation expectations, and fragile financial markets suggest deeper structural problems. This article examines how Trump’s tariffs disrupted economic stability, pressured the US dollar, and fueled a strong rally in EUR/USD.

How Trump’s Tariffs Distort US Economic Data and Mask Real Growth

President Trump’s tariff policy has disrupted the US economy. Because of temporary factors, the US GDP numbers do not accurately reflect the true health or direction of the economy. Businesses and consumers rushed to import goods before tariffs took effect in April, which inflated GDP, investment, and spending numbers.

Companies accelerated inventory accumulation to avoid anticipated price increases from tariffs. Additionally, consumers brought forward purchases, particularly in the automotive sector. These front-loaded activities temporarily boosted GDP but are expected to weigh on future growth.

Meanwhile, a decline in aggregate weekly hours worked during Q1 provides a more accurate signal of a slowing economy. The chart below shows that the US GDP contracted in Q1 2025, raising concerns about a potential recession.

The Trump Trade: Tariffs Distort US Growth and Fuel EUR/USD Rally_1

On the other hand, inflation trends also reflect tariff-driven shocks. Core PCE rose sharply by 0.5% in February, then dropped to just 0.03% in March, as shown in the chart below. Despite this decline, the Fed will unlikely proceed with further rate cuts.

The Trump Trade: Tariffs Distort US Growth and Fuel EUR/USD Rally_2

Meanwhile, consumers expect prices to rise further amid uncertainty in the financial system. The University of Michigan’s April survey indicates that Trump’s tariff plans fuel inflation fears. Inflation expectations for April 2025 have climbed above 6%, as shown in the chart below.

The Trump Trade: Tariffs Distort US Growth and Fuel EUR/USD Rally_3

Market Volatility Rises as Tariff Uncertainty Weighs on Investor Sentiment

Financial markets remain fragile under the weight of tariff uncertainty. The S&P 500 edged higher but lacked strong momentum. Investors stay cautious as tariff negotiations continue to stall. The chart below shows that the financial liquidity eased slightly to -0.45% on April 18, but long-term trends indicate tightening conditions ahead.

The Trump Trade: Tariffs Distort US Growth and Fuel EUR/USD Rally_4

The chart below shows that Moody’s Baa bond spreads peaked at 2.02% and remain elevated.

The Trump Trade: Tariffs Distort US Growth and Fuel EUR/USD Rally_5

Trump’s Tariffs Undermine US Dollar Strength and Confidence

Trump’s tariffs have weakened the US dollar. Rising inflation and fiscal deficits are damaging investor confidence. Tariffs are pushing up prices while growth slows, creating a stagflation-like environment that is making the dollar less attractive to global investors.

US Dollar Faces Technical Breakdown and Bearish Outlook

The monthly chart of the US Dollar Index shows that it has been trading within an ascending channel since 2009. Consolidation within this channel has stabilized over time. However, the index has repeatedly failed to break above the key resistance level at 115, keeping the door open for a potential decline.

The Trump Trade: Tariffs Distort US Growth and Fuel EUR/USD Rally_6

The peaks near 115 and 110, highlighted by red circles, mark the points where each downward leg began. The index has also broken a triangle pattern within the ascending channel and is now moving toward the 96–97 area. A decisive break below this level could trigger a sharp decline toward the 90 zone. The index must recover above 110 to resume the long-term upward trend.

EUR/USD Breakout Gains Momentum as Dollar Retreats

The weakness in the US dollar benefits the euro. EUR/USD has room to rise as traders move away from dollar-denominated assets. The monthly chart for EUR/USD shows a breakout from the falling wedge pattern, with the April 2025 close above $1.12. This breakout opens the door for a potential move toward the $1.22 area. Moreover, the RSI has moved above the midpoint, strengthening the bullish trend. The decline in the US dollar has triggered this strong rally in EUR/USD.

The Trump Trade: Tariffs Distort US Growth and Fuel EUR/USD Rally_7

The daily chart for EUR/USD shows a strong reversal from the $1.02 area, driven by the formation of a cup pattern. The breakout above $1.05 confirmed this pattern and opened the door for a strong rally in EUR/USD. The crossover of the 50-day SMA above the 200-day SMA further highlights the positive trend. Investors and traders may consider buying on pullbacks, targeting a move toward the $1.22 area.

The Trump Trade: Tariffs Distort US Growth and Fuel EUR/USD Rally_8

Source: fxempire

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Damon

Economic

The biggest question facing the Federal Reserve as it gathers again this week is how to grapple with a tariff-related "tug-of-war" between sticky inflation and a slowing economy — as well as a president who wants looser monetary policy.

How that dilemma gets resolved could mean two very different courses for interest rates in the coming months.

President Trump has made his views known in recent weeks: He wants rates lowered ahead of any slowing of the economy possibly triggered by his trade policies.

And he is not happy with the caution of Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who has said the central bank will "wait for greater clarity" while weighing both sides of its mandate for stable prices and full employment.

There is a "strong likelihood," Powell said last month, that the economy will be moving away from both of the Fed's goals for the "balance of the year, or at least not making much progress."

New reports on the economy, jobs, and inflation released last week reinforced the Fed's conundrum as it looks for patterns in the data.

A GDP report showed the US economy contracted for the first time in three years to begin 2025 due largely to a rush by importers to beat the start of President Trump's tariffs.

But an April jobs report released Friday also showed the labor market remained resilient even in the weeks after Trump's "Liberation Day" announcements shook markets.

An inflation gauge favored by the Fed showed that price growth slowed in March to an annualized 2.6%, but it was still a hotter-than-expected 3.5% for the quarter. And both marks are above the Fed's target of 2%.

Some economists expect inflation to kick higher and the economy to fall further in the months ahead.

The 'tug-of-war'

The challenge for the Fed, Wilmington Trust bond portfolio manager Wilmer Stith said, is that it has to ferret out "the tug-of-war between how much inflation is over the 2% target versus a deteriorating job market."

Luke Tilley, chief economist for Wilmington Trust, isn't expecting much change in the Fed's stance at this week's meeting. He does expect Powell to reiterate the tension between lower growth and higher inflation.

"They will hold where they are at this meeting, citing all of the uncertainty and that, if you look through the GDP data that still looks pretty strong and domestic demand was strong," he said.

Tilley said underlying demand was actually inflated during the first quarter by businesses stocking up on inventory ahead of the president's tariffs.

He expects the economy to slip into a mild, short recession in the second quarter, which he expects will lead the Fed to cut rates.

"I expect that by the end of the year they will be cutting rates and more so than they think right now — and more so that they'd ever be willing to say right now," Tilley said.

Tilley sees a rate cut at every meeting for the rest of the year starting in June, amounting to 125 basis points of reductions by year-end.

But he doesn't think the Fed will cut until there is an actual drop in economic growth.

That could lead to even more tension with the occupant of the White House. Trump in recent weeks has repeatedly made clear that he wants the Fed to cut rates and has accused it and Powell of being late.