Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



U.K. Trade Balance Non-EU (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Services Index MoMA:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Construction Output MoM (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Industrial Output YoY (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Trade Balance EU (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Manufacturing Output YoY (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. GDP MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. GDP YoY (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Industrial Output MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Construction Output YoY (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
France HICP Final MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Outstanding Loans Growth YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland M2 Money Supply YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland M0 Money Supply YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland M1 Money Supply YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
India CPI YoY (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
India Deposit Gowth YoYA:--
F: --
P: --
Brazil Services Growth YoY (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Industrial Output YoY (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Russia Trade Balance (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Philadelphia Fed President Henry Paulson delivers a speech
Canada Building Permits MoM (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Wholesale Sales YoY (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Wholesale Inventory MoM (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Wholesale Inventory YoY (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Wholesale Sales MoM (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Germany Current Account (Not SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig CountA:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Large Non-Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Small Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Large Non-Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Large Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Small Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Large Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
Japan Tankan Large-Enterprise Capital Expenditure YoY (Q4)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Rightmove House Price Index YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Industrial Output YoY (YTD) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Urban Area Unemployment Rate (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Saudi Arabia CPI YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Industrial Output YoY (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Industrial Output MoM (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Existing Home Sales MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Total Reserve Assets (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Inflation Rate Expectations--
F: --
P: --
Canada National Economic Confidence Index--
F: --
P: --
Canada New Housing Starts (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Employment Index (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Index (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core CPI YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Manufacturing Unfilled Orders MoM (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Manufacturing New Orders MoM (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core CPI MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Manufacturing Inventory MoM (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Canada CPI YoY (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada CPI MoM (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada CPI YoY (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Core CPI MoM (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --


No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
"The Trump administration's actions will begin to reverse..."
The Trump administration announced plans on Thursday to impose new port fees on Chinese commercial vessels—part of a broader effort to revive America's dwindling shipbuilding industry, which officials now view as a national security risk amid the urgent need to bolster hemispheric defense across the Americas in an increasingly fractured, bipolar world.
"Ships and shipping are vital to American economic security and the free flow of commerce," U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer wrote in a statement, adding, "The Trump administration's actions will begin to reverse Chinese dominance, address threats to the U.S. supply chain, and send a demand signal for U.S.-built ships."

The Federal Register notice titled "Notice of Action and Proposed Action in Section 301 Investigation of China's Targeting the Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance, Request for Comments," published Thursday by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), states that new fees will be imposed on all Chinese-built and Chinese-owned ships docking at ports across America. These fees will be based on net tonnage or the volume of goods carried per voyage and will only be charged once per voyage and not per port arrival.

"The fee will be set at $0 for the first 180 days, will then be set at $50/NT, and will increase incrementally over the next three years," the USTR notice read.
Effective as of April 17, 2025, a fee in the amount of $0 per net ton for the arriving vessel.
Effective as of October 14, 2025, a fee in the amount of $50 per net ton for the arriving vessel.
Effective as of April 17, 2026, a fee in the amount of $80 per net ton for the arriving vessel.
Effective as of April 17, 2027, a fee in the amount of $110 per net ton for the arriving vessel.
Effective as of April 17, 2028, a fee in the amount of $140 per net ton for the arriving vessel.
The USTR notice explained that "any such fee would be charged per rotation or string of U.S. port calls, and no more than five times a year on an individual vessel."

Service fees for vessel operators of Chinese-built vessels are lower.
Effective as of April 17, 2025, a fee in the amount of $0 for each container discharged.
Effective as of October 14, 2025, a fee in the amount of $18 per net ton ($120 per container)
Effective as of April 17, 2026, a fee in the amount of $23 per net ton ($153 per container)
Effective as of April 17, 2027, a fee in the amount of $28 per net ton ($195 per container)
Effective as of April 17, 2028, a fee in the amount of $33 per net ton ($250 per container).
The second phase will begin in three years and target Chinese LNG vessels. USTR explained the purpose of this action:
"To incentivize U.S.-built liquified natural gas (LNG) vessels, limited restrictions on transporting LNG via foreign vessels. These restrictions will increase incrementally over 22 years."
New taxes on Chinese commercial ships add to the complexity of a broadening trade war between the two economic superpowers. Trump recently slapped all Chinese goods entering the U.S. with a 145% effective tariff rate, while Beijing has slapped all U.S. goods entering China with a 125% levy.

The USTR notice continued, "A few comments agreed with the proposals, noting that the proposed fees would address trade imbalances, enhance national security, support investment in the American maritime industrial base, and promote higher environmental and labor standards. One commenter suggested that the proposed fees be captured in a U.S. shipbuilding and mariner compensation trust fund to be expended each year for reviving the U.S. merchant marine."
Time to make America's shipbuilding industry Great Again.
The White House has revealed that President Donald Trump is exploring whether he has the authority to fire Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. This news has sparked widespread debate about the independence of the Federal Reserve and the potential political interference in U.S. monetary policy.
The Federal Reserve, often simply called “the Fed,” is designed to be independent from political pressure, allowing it to make economic decisions without influence from the White House or Congress. However, Trump has been openly critical of Powell in the past, especially when interest rate hikes conflicted with his administration’s economic goals.
Jerome Powell was appointed to a four-year term as Fed Chair in 2018 and, under current law, cannot be removed without cause. The Federal Reserve Act does not clearly outline what constitutes “cause,” and no sitting Fed Chair has ever been fired by a president.
Legal scholars are divided on whether Trump has the legal authority to remove Powell. Some argue that because Powell is also a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, he can only be removed “for cause,” which would require clear evidence of misconduct or failure to fulfill duties. Others suggest that the President might attempt to demote Powell from the chairmanship without removing him entirely from the board, a move that would still be controversial.
If Trump attempts to fire or demote Powell, it could severely shake investor confidence and challenge the global perception of U.S. financial independence. Markets tend to react strongly to signs of political interference in monetary policy, and such a move could increase volatility in the stock and bond markets.
Furthermore, it could set a dangerous precedent for future administrations, allowing presidents to pressure central bank leaders into making politically favorable decisions rather than sound economic ones.
For now, Powell remains in his position, but the situation is being closely monitored by financial markets, legal experts, and political analysts alike.
Speaking to reporters, White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Trump was studying whether firing Powell was an option.
According to media reports citing sources, US President Trump has been privately discussing the possibility of replacing Federal Reserve Chairman Powell for months, but he has not yet made a final decision on this.
Powell, 72, is a Republican who was nominated by Trump as Fed chairman during his first term. Powell won the trust of the previous US President Biden and was able to get a second term as Fed chairman in 2022. His term will end in May next year.
As early as Trump's first term as US President (2017-2021), he and Powell disagreed. Trump repeatedly asked Powell to cut interest rates, while the latter insisted on maintaining the independence of the Federal Reserve.
After Trump started his second term, the conflict between him and Powell has intensified. While launching radical trade policies, Trump continued to pressure Powell to cut interest rates, but Powell remained unmoved.
People familiar with the matter revealed that in several meetings at his private estate in Florida, Mar-a-Lago, Trump and former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Walsh discussed the possibility of firing Powell before the end of his term and may consider Walsh to take over as Fed chairman.
Walsh is understood to have dissuaded Trump from firing Powell, arguing that he should be allowed to complete his term and that the Fed's independence should not be interfered with. The conversation with Walsh continued into February of this year, and other advisers to Trump even discussed firing Powell with him in early March.
As early as 2017, Trump considered Walsh as the chairman of the Federal Reserve before choosing Powell, who officially took office the following year.
In a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on Thursday, Trump said he believed he had the power to fire Powell.
"If I wanted him out, he'd be out in a heartbeat, believe me," Trump said.
He added that he was unhappy with Powell and accused him of playing politics on interest rates.
If Trump does try to fire Powell, the matter would almost certainly be appealed to the Supreme Court, a move that would not only put pressure on Powell's successor but could also roil markets as they worry about the precedent of a Fed chair being removed over policy differences.
Trump's advisers are divided over whether to take action, and it is unclear whether Trump will actually do so.
Inside the White House, Treasury Secretary Jeff Bessant has long opposed the idea of replacing Powell, arguing that the move is extremely risky and offers little benefit. He said this week that the Fed's independence in monetary policy is a "treasure that can never be destroyed" in the United States.
Some advisers, however, have advocated for a more direct challenge to Powell, arguing that the Fed and its backers in Washington and on Wall Street have overly glorified the institution’s independence, an independence that has no constitutional backing and is not conducive to economic development.
There is no legal precedent as to whether the president has the power to fire the Fed chairman before the end of his term.
Trump has previously admitted that the law is not clear on this. He said in October 2023: "I wanted to fire him (Powell) at the time (referring to the first term), but the question is whether you really have the power to do so."
Powell made it clear six years ago that if his position was challenged, he would fight through legal means, and his recent public statements show that this position has not changed.
The top Fed officials had prepared for this: once Powell's position as chairman of the Federal Reserve is challenged, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the independent body responsible for setting interest rates at the Fed, will immediately hold a meeting to re-elect Powell as chairman of the committee.
WASHINGTON (April 18): US President Donald Trump and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni each expressed confidence on Thursday that the US and Europe will be able to negotiate a trade deal before his 90-day pause on some tariffs ends.
The 27-nation European Union (EU) faces 25% import tariffs on steel, aluminium and cars, and broader tariffs on almost all other goods under Trump's policy to hit countries he says impose high barriers to US imports.
Trump said he was 100% certain of an eventual trade deal with Europe, the most confidence he has expressed on those negotiations since rattling world markets with his tariff announcements.
"Of course there will be a trade deal, very much. They want to make one very much. And we are going to make a trade deal. I fully expect it. And it will be a fair deal," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office after talks with Meloni, a close ally.
Meloni, positioning herself as an intermediary between the US and Europe, was equally confident.
She noted, however, that she could not lock in a deal for the full EU but said frank discussions could help resolve trade disputes that have strained US-European ties.
"I am sure we can make a deal, and I am here to help with that," she said.
Trump has offered to make trade deals with as many nations as possible to limit the impact of the tariffs. Asked about what countries were on his priority list, he said, “Everybody is on my priority list.” He also said he expected to make a trade deal with China.
While Trump is cool to many European leaders, he and Meloni, a 48-year-old conservative, have bonded. She was the only EU leader invited to Trump's inauguration in January, and he praised her leadership during their visit on Thursday.
"Our relationship is great," Trump said.
After a lunch meeting, Trump and Meloni sat side by side in the Oval Office and fielded questions during a lengthy session.
They both talked up their tough stances against diversity and inclusion policies, as well as migration. Meloni, who will host Vice President JD Vance in Rome on Friday, said Trump had accepted her invitation to visit Italy in the near future.
Trump enjoyed Meloni's long answer in Italian to a question that he declared "that was so beautiful" and insisted on hearing the translation.
Trump's move to pause most global tariffs for 90 days last week eased some pressure on Meloni's visit.
She is walking a tightrope between her ideological affinity with the president and her ties with European allies, who have criticized Trump's tariff hikes and his decision to exclude the EU from talks with Russia to end the war in Ukraine.
Meloni is facing pressure at home to protect Italy's export-driven economy, which last year ran a €40 billion (US$45.4 billion or RM200.77 billion) trade surplus with the US.
But she must also be seen as defending the interests of the whole 27-nation EU bloc.
Meloni told reporters she expected Italy would announce at the next Nato meeting in June that her country would be able to reach the alliance requirement that each member nation spend 2% of gross domestic product on defence spending.
Highly indebted Italy's projected defence budget for 2024 was 1.49% of gross domestic product, Nato figures showed, below the military alliance's current 2% target that Trump wants raised to 5%.
(April 18): US President Donald Trump said the US and Ukraine would sign a deal on critical minerals next Thursday, in a step expected to keep Kyiv in good favour, as the White House seeks to broker a quick ceasefire deal with Russia.
“We have a minerals deal which I guess is going to be signed on Thursday,” Trump said while meeting with Italian Prime Minster Giorgia Meloni in the Oval Office. “And I assume they are going to live up to the deal.”
The announcement puts the agreement — which fell through after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy clashed with Trump and Vice President JD Vance in the Oval Office — back on track, and suggests both sides have agreed to the contours of the accord governing postwar plans to exploit the country’s mineral deposits and rebuild its infrastructure.
The agreement comes as Trump has vacillated between blaming Moscow and Kyiv for failing to end the war that began with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Trump has demanded a joint US-Ukraine development deal as compensation for the weapons and other aid the US provided under his predecessor, Joe Biden.
Earlier this months Ukraine and US have conducted technical discussions on the deal and agreed to sign transitional memorandum of intent, fixing the positive steps, made by the parties. The document was signed online late on Thursday, clearing the way “for an Economic Partnership Agreement and the establishment of the Investment Fund for the Reconstruction of Ukraine”, Ukraine’s Vice Prime-Minister Yulia Svyrydenko said in a post on X.
“This document is the result of the professional work of the negotiating teams, which recently completed another round of technical discussions in Washington,” Svyrydenko added.
The partnership accord would grant the US first claim on profits transferred into a special reconstruction investment fund that would be controlled by Washington. In negotiations, Kyiv has pressed for better terms and refused to recognise the past US assistance as debt.
Following a round of negotiations in Washington, the Trump administration reduced its estimate for the assistance the US provided to Kyiv since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion from US$300 billion (RM1.32 trillion) to about US$100 billion, according to people familiar with the matter. This bring it closer to Ukraine’s own estimate of more than US$90 billion.
Trump backtracked from recent comments in which he said Zelenskiy was to blame for the war in Ukraine — while still lobbing criticism at the Ukrainian leader.
“I don’t hold Zelenskiy responsible but I’m not exactly thrilled with the fact that war started,” Trump said. He added that he was not happy with Zelenskiy because of the bloody toll of the war.
“I wouldn’t say he’s done the greatest job,” he said. “I am not a fan.”
Still, Trump said, his attention was on getting Russian leader Vladimir Putin to agree to end the fighting.
“I’m trying to get him to stop, because as you know, Russia’s a lot bigger,” Trump said.
AUDUSD is trading near its yearly high at 0.6408, continuing a strong uptrend. Further gains are likely. Full analysis for 18 April 2025 below.
AUDUSD has gained steadily over the past two weeks, nearing the yearly high of 0.6408. The rally is supported by broad US dollar weakness and the strong performance of gold — a key Australian export.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell recently reiterated that the Fed will not rush to cut interest rates until there is greater clarity on the US economic outlook.
At the same time, the introduction of new tariffs by President Donald Trump’s administration has added pressure on the dollar. According to Powell, these measures may intensify inflationary risks while weighing on US economic growth — both factors favouring commodity-linked currencies like the Aussie.
AUDUSD is advancing within a clear bullish trend and is currently trading just below 0.6400. The Alligator indicator confirms the strength of the upward impulse.
In the short term, if buyers maintain momentum, a breakout above the yearly high at 0.6408 is possible. Should sellers regain control, a pullback toward the 0.6330–0.6300 support zone may follow.


AUDUSD remains firmly in an uptrend, supported by USD weakness and strong commodity prices. A near-term test of the 0.6408 yearly high is likely. Today’s forecast for 18 April 2025 points to a possible breakout, while key support lies in the 0.6300–0.6330 range.
China is widely expected to leave its benchmark lending rates unchanged at the monthly fixing on Monday, a Reuters survey showed, but markets are wagering on more stimulus being rolled out soon in the face of an escalating Sino-U.S. trade war.
Policymakers have to walk a tight rope as the yuan has come under pressure after U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff onslaught, while shrinking interest margins at lenders has continued to limit the scope for monetary easing.
The loan prime rate (LPR), normally charged to banks' best clients, is calculated each month after 20 designated commercial banks submit proposed rates to the People's Bank of China (PBOC).
In a Reuters survey of 31 market watchers conducted this week, 27, or 87% of all respondents expected both the one-year and five-year LPRs to remain steady, while the remaining four participants projected a reduction of 10 to 15 basis points to the five-year rate.
Most new and outstanding loans in China are based on the one-year LPR, while the five-year rate influences the pricing of mortgages.
China last cut its policy rate in September and benchmark LPRs in October.
"I don't think there will be a LPR cut (this month)," said a trader at a wealth management firm.
"They will need to lower the deposit rates first."
A reduction to the banks' deposit rates could alleviate net interest margin pressure at lenders and allow them to lower lending rates.
China's gross domestic product (GDP) grew 5.4% in the first quarter, beating expectations, but markets fear a sharp downturn in the year ahead as U.S. tariff policies pose the biggest risk to the Asian powerhouse in decades.
Indeed, export data was yet to capture the impact from higher tariffs as many factories front-loaded their orders to beat the duties, analysts said.
Trump has raised tariffs on Chinese goods to a massive 145%, prompting Beijing to retaliate with higher 125% duties on U.S. goods in a tit-for-tat trade war that has roiled investors.
Market participants still expect some monetary easing measures in coming months to support the broad economy and cushion the impact of U.S. tariffs.
Any moves to boost stimulus, however, will require policymakers consider the impact on the yuan, which is down 0.4% against the dollar since Trump's April 2 announcement of global tariffs.
"To bolster domestic financial and property markets while promoting yuan internationalization, Beijing most likely won't allow a sharp yuan depreciation against the dollar," said Ting Lu, chief China economist at Nomura.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features

FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up