US Dollar Seesaws After Federal Court Blocks Trump’s Tariffs

Source: Bloomberg

Source: CNN

A federal judge said on Wednesday that she would issue an order that would continue to block the Trump administration from immediately revoking Harvard University's ability to enroll international students.

U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston announced her intention to issue a broad preliminary injunction shortly after the administration revealed it plans to pursue a new, lengthier administrative process to block the students' enrollment.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security changed course ahead of a hearing before Burroughs over whether to extend a temporary order blocking President Donald Trump's administration from revoking the Ivy League school's right to host international students.

The department in a notice, opens new tab sent to Harvard near midnight on Wednesday said it would give the school 30 days to contest its plans to revoke its certification under a federal program allowing it to enroll non-U.S. students.

The Justice Department filed a copy of the notice in court two hours before Thursday's hearing. Harvard's lawyers and the judge said at the hearing that they were still processing it and assessing its impact on the school's lawsuit.

When Burroughs asked if the notice acknowledged that procedural steps were not taken, Justice Department attorney Tiberius Davis replied that this wasn't necessarily the case. Instead, he said, the notice recognized that adopting the procedures Harvard advocated for would be better and simpler.

Davis said the notice made Harvard's arguments at this time moot. However, Burroughs, an appointee of Democratic former President Barack Obama, expressed skepticism about that, saying "Aren’t we still going to end up back here at the same place?"

Ian Gershengorn, a lawyer for Harvard, told Burroughs that an injunction protecting Harvard during the administrative process was necessary, saying the school was worried about the administration's efforts to retaliate against it.

"The First Amendment harms we are suffering are real and continuing," he said.

Burroughs said a preliminary injunction was needed to stop any immediate changes and protect international students arriving to attend Harvard.

The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university says DHS's action is part of an "unprecedented and retaliatory attack on academic freedom at Harvard," which is pursuing a separate lawsuit challenging the administration's decision to terminate nearly $3 billion in federal research funding.

Harvard argues the Trump administration is retaliating against it for refusing to accede to its demands to control the school's governance, curriculum and the ideology of its faculty and students.

Harvard filed the lawsuit a day after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on May 22 announced she was revoking its certification with the Student and Exchange Visitor Program.

Harvard said the decision was "devastating" for the school and its student body. The university, the nation's oldest and wealthiest, enrolled nearly 6,800 international students in its current school year, about 27% of its total enrollment.

Map shows the country of citizenship of international students enrolled by Harvard University in fall 2024

Harvard had argued that the revocation not only violated its free speech and due process rights under the U.S. Constitution but also failed to comply with DHS regulations. The regulations require it to receive 30 days to challenge the agency's allegations and an opportunity to pursue an administrative appeal.

In announcing the initial decision to revoke Harvard's certification, Noem, without providing evidence, accused the university of "fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party."

In a letter that day, she accused the school of refusing to comply with wide-ranging requests for information on its student visa holders, including about any activity they engaged in that was illegal or violent or that would subject them to discipline.

The department's move would prevent Harvard from enrolling new international students and require existing ones to transfer to other schools or lose their legal status. Trump on Wednesday said that Harvard should have a 15% cap on the number of non-U.S. students it admits.

Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Additional reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Lisa Shumaker

Source: Reuters

Bitcoin: Total whale holdings and monthly change (%). Source: CryptoQuant

Number of coins held and number of wallets 100-1K BTC addresses. Source: Santiment

US-based spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) continue to see massive capital inflows, with data from SoSoValue showing these investment products have recorded inflows for 10 consecutive days, totaling $4.2 billion.

Spot Bitcoin ETF flows data. Source: SoSoValue

Social media circles have sustained positive sentiment around Bitcoin and crypto assets. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index, a barometer of investor sentiment, stands at a notable score of 74, hinting at prevailing “greed” in the market.

Crypto Fear & Greed Index. Source: Alternative.me

The IO is currently at $78.4 billion, reflecting a $27.6 billion or a 54% increase over the last 50 days alone, suggesting a buildup of leverage ​​often accompanying bullish environments.

Bitcoin futures aggregate open interest, USD. Source: CoinGlass

Bitcoin options OI across all exchanges. Source: Glassnode

Liquidation data shows a thick cluster of orders between the $111,000 and $115,000 levels. These positions often act like a magnet, pulling the price toward them as market makers hunt for liquidity.

BTC/USDT six-month liquidation heatmap. Source: CoinGlass

Bitcoin: MVRV extreme deviation pricing bands. Source: Glassnode

Source: Cointelegraph

Source: Theguardian

Senior Trump administration officials on Thursday downplayed the impact of a U.S. trade court ruling that blocked the most sweeping of President Donald Trump's tariffs, expressing confidence it would be overturned on appeal and insisting there are other legal avenues to employ in the interim.

Financial markets, which have whipsawed wildly in response to every twist and turn in Trump's chaotic trade war, reacted with cautious optimism on Thursday, a day after the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that Trump overstepped his authority in imposing punitive tariffs on virtually every country in the world.

The Trump administration immediately asked an appeals court to stay the ruling and allow the tariff regime to remain in place. Trump has put tariffs at the center of his effort to extract concessions from U.S. trading partners, including traditional allies such as the European Union.

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett expressed confidence that the ruling would ultimately be reversed in an interview with Fox Business on Thursday. He also said it would not get in the way of signing new trade deals.

"If there are little hiccups here or there because of decisions that activist judges make, then it shouldn't just concern you at all, and it's certainly not going to affect the negotiations," Hassett said.

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, a staunch proponent of higher tariffs, told Bloomberg TV that the Trump administration could rely on other laws to implement import taxes if the court's decision remains in place.

Trump had invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a law intended to address threats during national emergencies, to impose tariffs on almost every U.S. trading partner, raising fears of a global recession. The president temporarily suspended many of the tariffs until early July after markets swooned in response.

The court found that the emergency powers law does not grant Trump the unilateral power to order such sweeping tariffs. Some sector-specific tariffs, such as those Trump has imposed on steel, aluminum and automobiles, were imposed under separate authorities on national security grounds and were unaffected by the ruling.

Canadian Prime Minister Jay Carney welcomed the decision, saying it was "consistent with Canada's longstanding position" that Trump's tariffs were unlawful.

Other U.S. trading partners offered careful responses. The British government said the ruling was a domestic matter for the U.S. administration and noted it was "only the first stage of legal proceedings."

Both Germany and the European Commission said they could not comment on the decision.

MODEST MARKET GAINS

Several analysts said it was preliminary to conclude this closes the door entirely on Trump's sweeping tariffs, with legal paths other than IEEPA likely at his disposal.

"We suspect the administration will lean on other legal authorities to maintain tariff levels around current levels," Bernard Yaros, lead U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, wrote in a note to clients on Thursday.

After prompting an initial surge in stocks in Asia, the ruling stimulated more muted reactions in Europe, where indexes were largely flat, and in the U.S., where gains were modest. The S&P 500 was up about 0.5%, having given back about half of its initial rise at the opening bell.

An early rally in the dollar also fizzled and the greenback was about 0.4% lower against a basket of major trading partner currencies. Bond yields also slipped.

Following a market revolt after his major tariff announcement on April 2, Trump paused most import duties for 90 days and said he would hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners.

But apart from a pact with Britain this month, agreements remain elusive, and the court's suspension of the tariffs may dissuade countries like Japan from rushing into deals, analysts said.

"Assuming that an appeal does not succeed in the next few days, the main win is time to prepare, and also a cap on the breadth of tariffs – which can't exceed 15% for the time being," George Lagarias, chief economist at Forvis Mazars international advisers, said.

Trump's trade war has shaken makers of everything from luxury handbags and sneakers to household appliances and cars as the price of raw materials has risen, supply chains have been disrupted and company strategies redrafted.

Source: Reuters