Seoul Scrambles as US Tariff Threat Tests Alliance

Isaac Bennett

Economic

Daily News

Forex

Political

Remarks of Officials

Summary:

US-South Korea trade talks hit an impasse over tariff threats tied to Seoul's investment pledges, amid broader tensions.

High-level trade talks between the United States and South Korea have hit an impasse, failing to resolve a brewing dispute sparked by President Donald Trump's threat to impose new tariffs. An initial meeting in Washington between South Korean Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan and US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick ended without a breakthrough, though discussions are set to resume Friday.

At the center of the conflict is a warning from President Trump that he could reinstate tariffs of up to 25% on key South Korean imports, including automobiles, timber, and pharmaceuticals.

The Core Dispute: Unfulfilled Investment Pledges

The White House is citing delays in Seoul's implementation of investment commitments linked to last year's trade agreement as the primary reason for the tariff threat. US officials have pointed specifically to the stalled passage of a "Special Law on Strategic Investment with the US," which was intended to formalize Korea's pledges.

In response, South Korean officials have sought to reassure Washington. Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan reiterated his government's commitment to following through on the agreed-upon investments, including the necessary legislation. Officials in Seoul frame the US threat not as a reaction to a broken deal, but as a tactic to pressure them to accelerate implementation.

Parallel Tensions Complicate Talks

The trade friction is unfolding alongside other sensitive issues testing the relationship between the two allies.

The Coupang Investigation

South Korea is currently conducting a wide-ranging investigation into a data breach at Coupang Inc., a major e-commerce company headquartered and listed in the US. The probe has drawn criticism from some of the company's shareholders.

On Friday, Harold Rogers, Coupang's interim head of Korea operations, is scheduled to appear before police for questioning for the first time regarding the data breach. However, South Korean officials are adamant that the two issues are separate. Foreign Minister Cho Hyun stated on Thursday that the tariff dispute is unrelated to the Coupang case.

Economic and Military Oversight

Adding to the complex backdrop, Washington has released a new defense strategy that signals a potential reduction in American military support for deterring North Korea.

Simultaneously, the US Treasury Department confirmed that South Korea remains on its monitoring list for currency practices and macroeconomic policies. The Korean government stated it will maintain close communication with the Treasury to ensure mutual understanding on foreign exchange markets and promote currency stability.

A Diplomatic Push to Avert a Crisis

South Korea has dispatched senior ministers to Washington in an urgent effort to defuse the dispute. Following the initial talks, Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo is also scheduled to meet with his American counterpart, Jamieson Greer, to continue the diplomatic push and reaffirm Seoul's commitment to the trade deal.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Context and Why This Upgrade Matters

This upgrade is essentially a political signal with practical spillovers: it formalizes that Vietnam–EU cooperation is no longer mainly trade-led, but is now framed as a broad strategic relationship spanning economics, security, technology, climate, and multilateral coordination. The text repeatedly ties the partnership to a rules-based international order grounded in international law, which matters because it positions the relationship as values-and-rules aligned while still being pragmatic and interest-based. It also builds continuity rather than “reinventing” the relationship, explicitly referencing the existing backbone of agreements and dialogue mechanisms, meaning implementation can start from an established institutional base rather than from scratch.

The statement treats economic, trade, and investment cooperation as the “core foundation” for inclusive and sustainable growth, with EVFTA as the central instrument. The tone is important: it emphasizes handling difficulties through open and constructive dialogue, which is a diplomatic way of saying both sides expect friction points, but want them resolved institutionally rather than politically. The explicit call to promote ratification and effective implementation of EVIPA is also a strong investment signal, because investment protection architecture tends to matter most when companies are deciding on long-horizon, capital-heavy projects.

Where the New Agenda Expands: Critical Materials, Supply Chains, Digital, and High-Value Investment

A notable expansion is the list of priority sectors, which reads like a modern strategic-economic toolkit: critical raw materials, low-carbon energy and technology, circular economy, logistics and transport, secure communications infrastructure, semiconductors, AI, digital transformation and cybersecurity, and supply-chain resilience and diversification, alongside sustainable agriculture, forestry, and fisheries. The logic is straightforward: these are the areas where the EU’s strategic autonomy agenda and Vietnam’s industrial upgrading ambitions can meet. The statement also frames the goal as attracting EU investment into high-tech and high value-added projects linked to technology transfer, human capital development, and participation in global production and supply chains, which is a “quality FDI” positioning rather than purely volume-seeking investment.

The statement places trade and sustainable development commitments in EVFTA at the center, including labor cooperation and references to ILO standards. Practically, this suggests the EU is keeping sustainability conditionality and compliance expectations visible. At the same time, the EU explicitly offers technical support to help Vietnam adapt to new EU policies and regulations on green and sustainable trade. That combination is important: it signals higher standards are part of the trade relationship, but there is also capacity-building support to reduce compliance shocks for Vietnamese exporters and policymakers.

Security and Defense Cooperation: From Dialogue to Capability Building

On peace, defense, and security, the statement elevates cooperation through the annual Defense–Security Dialogue and broadens it into training and operational domains, including peacekeeping, search and rescue, disaster response, fire prevention, and specialized simulation training. It also mentions cooperation around non-sensitive technology transfer and technical know-how in defense and security-related fields, framed carefully to remain consistent with each side’s laws and sensitivities. There is also a strong emphasis on tackling transnational crime, including money laundering, smuggling, trade fraud, origin fraud, cybercrime, and environmental crime, which links security cooperation directly to trade integrity and economic governance.

The statement reiterates familiar but strategically meaningful language: peace and stability in the South China Sea, disputes resolved peacefully, non-use of force, and freedom of navigation and overflight, with UNCLOS 1982 explicitly affirmed as the legal framework for maritime activities. It also welcomes progress toward an effective and substantive COC consistent with international law including UNCLOS. This section matters less for novelty and more for alignment: it positions Vietnam–EU coordination within a broader rules-based maritime order narrative and strengthens Vietnam’s multilateral diplomatic support base.

Climate, Energy Transition, and Carbon Markets: JETP, Net Zero, and Regional Connectivity

The climate and energy section is unusually dense, pointing to net zero by 2050 for both sides, alignment with Paris Agreement objectives and global assessment pathways, and the importance of decarbonizing power systems and transitioning away from fossil fuels in an orderly and equitable manner. It references JETP and Power Development Plan VIII adjustments as opportunity anchors, suggesting the EU is framing Vietnam’s energy transition as a bankable, structured pathway rather than a vague ambition. The mention of ASEAN Power Grid development also signals that the partnership sees Vietnam not only as a national market, but as part of a regional energy connectivity story. Carbon pricing and ETS-type mechanisms are also highlighted as cooperation areas, implying the EU is open to technical and institutional exchanges on carbon market design and implementation.

Digital cooperation is framed through a security lens: safe digital technology, secure and resilient digital connectivity, trusted digital services, and supply-chain security, including potential cooperation on 5G, satellite connectivity, semiconductors, AI, data governance, and cybersecurity. Transport cooperation focuses on sustainable connectivity, ports and shipping routes, aviation links under the ASEAN–EU comprehensive aviation framework, and decarbonization including sustainable aviation fuels. The subtext is that economic integration is increasingly treated as infrastructure-plus-standards, not just tariffs.

People-to-People and Skills: Education, Erasmus+, Research, and Mobility Facilitation

The statement commits to expanding education and training cooperation, including Erasmus+, student and faculty exchanges, and vocational skills initiatives related to green transition, digital transition, and smart manufacturing. It also points to research collaboration and engagement with Horizon Europe. Importantly, it flags interest in making travel and mobility easier for citizens on both sides, which can have real second-order impacts on business formation, investment scouting, academic collaboration, and tourism.

The practical meaning of this upgrade will depend on how quickly the new partnership converts into scheduled deliverables: formation and activation of the Vietnam–EU working group referenced under EVFTA implementation, concrete project pipelines under Global Gateway and JETP-linked financing, progress on EVIPA ratification, and measurable movement on “yellow card” IUU issues. The more these translate into timelines, funding envelopes, and sector-specific MOUs, the more the partnership becomes a lived economic reality rather than a diplomatic label.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Isaac Bennett

Energy

Middle East Situation

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Economic

Latest news on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Daily News

Political

Remarks of Officials

Russian President Vladimir Putin met with UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan in Moscow on Thursday, expressing gratitude for the Emirates' significant role in mediating the conflict in Ukraine.

The high-level meeting at the Kremlin took place as negotiators prepare for a new round of peace talks.

UAE's Central Role in Negotiations

The discussions underscored the UAE's growing diplomatic influence. Putin specifically thanked his counterpart for the UAE's efforts in hosting trilateral talks involving Russia, Ukraine, and the United States. A new round of these negotiations is scheduled to take place in Abu Dhabi this Sunday.

Sheikh Mohammed affirmed the UAE's readiness to "assist all constructive efforts" on key humanitarian issues. He also highlighted his pride in the country's successful mediation of prisoner exchanges between Russia and Ukraine.

Expanding the Agenda: Mideast and Economic Ties

Beyond the Ukraine war, the two leaders addressed pressing developments in the Middle East. On the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, they agreed on the "urgent need to intensify efforts" toward a just and comprehensive peace founded on a two-state solution.

The meeting also covered strengthening bilateral cooperation between Russia and the UAE. Key areas of focus included:

• Trade and investment

• Technology and space exploration

• Energy partnerships

This dialogue builds on a clear trend of deepening ties. Last summer, Russia and the UAE formalized their growing economic relationship by signing two major trade and partnership agreements.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Frederick Miles

Daily News

Political

Economic

Remarks of Officials

U.S. lawmakers forged a last-minute agreement Thursday evening on a spending package designed to prevent an imminent government shutdown. However, with critical negotiations over funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) unresolved, the risk of a disruption to federal operations remains.

What the New Spending Deal Covers

The bipartisan agreement bundles six spending bills to fund the majority of federal agencies. According to reports, the deal effectively separates the less contentious parts of the budget from the main point of conflict: the DHS.

To allow for further negotiation, funding for the Department of Homeland Security will be maintained at its current levels for an additional two weeks. This temporary measure pushes the most difficult part of the debate down the road while keeping most of the government open.

A Weekend Shutdown Remains Possible

Congress is now in a race against the clock. Lawmakers must approve the new funding before the midnight deadline on Friday to officially avert what would be the second government shutdown since October.

While the Senate is currently working through the legislative process, the exact timing of a final vote is still unclear.

A key logistical hurdle is that the House of Representatives is not scheduled to return to Washington until Monday. This scheduling gap creates a scenario where a brief lapse in government funding could occur over the weekend, even if the bills ultimately pass.

President Donald Trump has endorsed a bipartisan deal to stave off a shutdown, though he told reporters on Thursday that a shutdown could still happen.

Immigration Policy at the Heart of DHS Stalemate

The primary obstacle to a full funding agreement is the heated debate over the Trump administration's aggressive immigration enforcement policies.

Tensions escalated this month after immigration agents shot at least two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. The incident has intensified calls from Senate Democrats and some Republicans for President Trump to rein in the DHS's operational oversight. This political standoff in Washington is set against a backdrop of ongoing protests against the administration's immigration policies in major U.S. cities.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Commodity

Middle East Tensions Anchor Oil Near Recent Highs

Oil prices remained elevated on Friday, consolidating close to levels last seen in mid-2025, as investors weighed the growing risk of a U.S. strike on Iran. Brent crude futures slipped slightly to around $70.50 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate eased to roughly $65.03, after both benchmarks surged more than 3% in the previous session. Despite the marginal decline, oil remains firmly supported by geopolitical concerns, with traders reluctant to unwind long positions ahead of potential escalation.

The broader picture remains bullish on a monthly basis. Brent is up more than 16% in January, marking its biggest monthly gain since January 2022, while WTI has climbed over 14%, its strongest monthly advance since July 2023. This reflects a clear causal link between heightened geopolitical risk and energy prices, as fears of supply disruption tend to be rapidly priced into oil markets.

Trump’s Iran Stance Fuels Risk Premium

Tensions intensified after U.S. President Donald Trump warned Iran to return to negotiations over its nuclear program or face possible military action. Tehran responded with threats of retaliation, reinforcing concerns that any conflict could disrupt exports from Iran, one of the largest producers in OPEC.

According to market analysts, this rhetoric has injected a substantial risk premium into crude prices. The concern is less about immediate production losses and more about the vulnerability of critical shipping routes, particularly the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant share of global oil supply flows. Even a limited disruption could have outsized effects on prices, given the tightness already present in some segments of the market.

Washington Diplomacy Signals Caution, Not Escalation

Senior defense and intelligence officials from Israel and Saudi Arabia are reportedly visiting Washington this week to discuss Iran, underscoring the seriousness of the situation. U.S. officials have indicated that Trump is reviewing options but has not yet made a final decision on military action.

Major banks remain cautious about assuming a worst-case scenario. Analysts at JPMorgan said they do not expect prolonged oil supply disruptions, citing elevated inflation concerns and the political sensitivity of high energy prices ahead of U.S. midterm elections. They argue that even if military action were to occur, it would likely be targeted and designed to avoid Iran’s oil production and export infrastructure. Citi echoed this view, assigning a 70% probability to restrained actions such as limited strikes or tanker seizures rather than a broad conflict.

This suggests that the current price strength is driven more by expectations and precautionary positioning than by confirmed supply losses, highlighting a correlation between geopolitical headlines and oil prices rather than a realized disruption.

Supply Side Factors Add To Market Tightness

Beyond geopolitics, several supply-side issues have tightened the market in January. Disruptions in Kazakhstan, Russia, and Venezuela have collectively affected about 1.5 million barrels per day of supply. In Kazakhstan, the massive Tengiz oilfield is being restarted in stages after electrical fires earlier this month temporarily hit output, with authorities aiming for full production within a week.

Weather-related disruptions have also weighed on Russian exports, while Venezuela’s production was curtailed earlier this month following political upheaval. That situation may now be turning, however, as Venezuela’s interim government approved sweeping reforms to its main oil law, and the Trump administration moved to broadly ease U.S. sanctions on the country’s oil industry. These steps could eventually support higher Venezuelan output and attract new investment, partially offsetting other supply risks over time.

Outlook Balances Risk And Restraint

Oil’s ability to hold near multi-month highs reflects a market caught between two forces. On one side, geopolitical risk and recent supply disruptions are pushing prices higher and sustaining a strong monthly performance. On the other, expectations of restrained military action and the potential for increased output from countries like Venezuela are limiting upside momentum.

For now, traders appear content to maintain a risk premium rather than aggressively chase prices higher. The result is a market hovering near recent peaks, sensitive to headlines and vulnerable to sharp moves should diplomatic signals shift decisively in either direction.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Geopolitical Risk Reignites Market Volatility

Volatility swept through global markets on Thursday as investors reacted to escalating geopolitical and political risks. Concerns over a potential U.S. strike on Iran pushed energy markets sharply higher, while the renewed threat of a U.S. government shutdown unsettled risk sentiment more broadly. These factors combined to amplify price swings across asset classes, reversing the relative calm that had characterized markets earlier in January.

Oil prices were at the center of this turbulence. Brent crude surged above $70 a barrel for the first time since July, while WTI crude reached its highest level since September. This move reflects a clear causal relationship between heightened geopolitical risk and oil prices, as supply disruption fears tend to translate directly into higher energy prices. The rebound in oil has important macro implications, as year-on-year energy price changes had been strongly disinflationary since 2024, running at around minus 25% at the start of this year. That figure has now narrowed to roughly minus 5%, raising concerns that energy may soon shift from a drag on inflation to a source of renewed pressure.

Commodity Frenzy Shows Signs of Strain

Extreme volatility was especially visible in commodity markets. Gold, silver, and copper all surged to new highs during the session before reversing sharply and closing lower. Copper briefly touched a fresh record high, while precious metals suffered what traders described as a flash-style correction.

This pattern suggests a correlation between elevated speculative positioning and abrupt price reversals rather than a sudden collapse in underlying demand. Recent gains in metals have been fueled by a weaker dollar, geopolitical stress, and investor demand for real assets, but the speed and scale of the rally left markets vulnerable to liquidation once momentum stalled. Volatility itself became a destabilizing force, spilling over into foreign exchange markets and reinforcing broader risk aversion.

Tech Stocks Hit by AI Return Anxiety

Equity markets were hit hardest in the technology sector, where fears of an overstretched AI investment cycle resurfaced. The Nasdaq fell 0.7% and the S&P 500 closed marginally lower, while the Dow managed a modest gain. Shares of Microsoft plunged 10%, and SAP dropped 15%, as investors questioned whether massive spending on artificial intelligence would deliver sufficient returns.

This selloff reflects a reassessment of valuation rather than a definitive end to the AI growth story. Historically, periods of transformative technological change have often been accompanied by speculative excess, followed by corrections that reprice expectations. Analysts note that such pullbacks are a structural feature of innovation cycles, suggesting that volatility is a symptom of maturation rather than outright failure.

Powell’s Silence Adds Another Layer of Uncertainty

Attention also turned to the Federal Reserve, particularly what Chair Jerome Powell did not say during his press conference on Wednesday. While Powell highlighted improvements in the U.S. economy, his limited commentary on the Fed’s institutional independence stood out amid growing political scrutiny.

This absence was notable given the broader backdrop of political pressure and speculation about future Fed leadership. Markets appear increasingly sensitive to signals, explicit or implicit, about the central bank’s autonomy. The resulting uncertainty contributes to volatility through expectations rather than direct policy action, illustrating how communication gaps can have real market consequences.

Cross-Asset Repricing Reflects Fragile Sentiment

Beyond equities and commodities, the ripple effects of Thursday’s volatility were visible across asset classes. Treasury yields dipped by 2 to 3 basis points as investors sought relative safety, producing a bull steepening of the yield curve. The U.S. dollar came under renewed pressure, while bitcoin fell around 6%, underscoring how risk-off moves extended into digital assets.

Indonesia’s equity market illustrated how fragile sentiment can magnify local stress. The benchmark index plunged as much as 10% at one point before paring losses, highlighting how global volatility can exacerbate existing domestic concerns.

Volatility as a Structural Feature, Not an Anomaly

Thursday’s market action suggests that volatility is reasserting itself as a defining feature of the current environment. Geopolitical shocks, political uncertainty, and valuation concerns are interacting rather than acting in isolation, creating feedback loops that amplify price movements. While none of these factors alone guarantee a sustained downturn, their convergence has increased the probability of further sharp swings.

As markets look ahead to key macro data releases and major corporate earnings, including energy and financial firms, investors are likely to remain cautious. The lesson from this session is not that the rally is over, but that the path forward is unlikely to be smooth, with volatility once again a central driver of short-term market behavior.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Stocks

Asian Stocks Falter After Strong Monthly Run

Asian stock markets traded unevenly on Friday, reflecting heightened global uncertainty even as the region remains on track for its strongest monthly performance in over three years. MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan slipped around 0.2% in early trading, swinging between gains and losses as investors digested political signals from the United States and renewed concerns over technology sector valuations.

The pullback follows a powerful January rally driven by easing financial conditions, resilient U.S. growth expectations and strong inflows into risk assets. While near-term momentum has softened, the broader monthly performance highlights how Asia has benefited from global capital rotation despite persistent volatility.

US Policy Signals Drive Global Market Jitters

Market nerves were amplified after U.S. President Donald Trump endorsed a bipartisan deal to avoid a government shutdown and said he had decided on his nominee to lead the Federal Reserve. Trump indicated he would announce his pick on Friday, reigniting speculation over the future direction of U.S. monetary policy.

The U.S. dollar index rose 0.3% to 96.441 following Trump’s remarks, reflecting expectations that a clearer fiscal outlook and leadership transition at the Fed could support the currency. On prediction market Polymarket, the implied probability that former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh would be nominated surged to 88%, underscoring how closely markets are tracking potential shifts at the central bank once Jerome Powell’s tenure ends.

U.S. Treasury yields moved higher alongside the dollar, with the 10-year yield rising nearly four basis points to 4.263%. Futures markets continued to price a high probability that the Fed will keep rates unchanged at its March meeting, suggesting policy continuity in the short term despite political uncertainty.

Wall Street Tech Selloff Spills Into Asia

Asian sentiment was also pressured by a turbulent Wall Street session overnight. The S&P 500 closed down 0.1%, while the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.7%, dragged lower by renewed concerns over the sustainability of tech valuations.

Shares of Microsoft plunged 10%, wiping out more than $350 billion in market capitalization after its cloud growth failed to impress investors, raising doubts about the near-term payoff of its heavy AI investments. In contrast, Meta Platforms surged 10% as its AI-driven improvements in ad targeting supported a stronger-than-expected revenue outlook.

Apple offered a rare bright spot, forecasting revenue growth of up to 16% for the March quarter, driven by resilient iPhone demand and a rebound in China. Despite Apple’s optimism, the mixed earnings picture reinforced a more selective approach among investors toward large-cap technology stocks.

Japan Data Eases Pressure on the BOJ

In Japan, the Nikkei 225 was broadly flat after data showed Tokyo’s core consumer prices rose 2.0% year on year in January. The reading marked a slowdown from the previous month but remained aligned with the Bank of Japan’s inflation target, easing immediate pressure on the central bank to accelerate policy tightening.

The data reinforced expectations that the BOJ will continue to normalize policy gradually, a stance that has so far failed to provide sustained support for the yen but has helped anchor domestic equity sentiment.

Commodities And Crypto Remain Volatile

Precious metals struggled to stabilize after a sharp flash crash earlier in the week. Gold fell 0.7% to around $5,358 an ounce, while silver slipped 0.2% to $115.89. Analysts noted that the pullback reflects position unwinding rather than a fundamental shift in demand, particularly after an extended rally driven by geopolitical risk and currency debasement fears.

Oil prices also edged lower, with WTI crude down 0.7% at $64.95 a barrel, as markets weighed geopolitical risks following Trump’s executive order targeting countries supplying oil to Cuba. Meanwhile, cryptocurrencies extended their decline, with bitcoin down 2.0% to about $82,685 and ether falling 1.7% to $2,768.

Best Month In Years, But Volatility Lingers

Despite the choppy finish, Asia’s equity markets remain on track for their best monthly performance since 2022, supported by improving global growth expectations and strong earnings resilience. The current volatility reflects correlation with U.S. political and monetary developments rather than a reversal of regional fundamentals.

As markets await clarity on Fed leadership and the durability of U.S. tech earnings, Asian investors appear cautious in the short term but not yet convinced that January’s rally has run its course.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

Seoul Scrambles as US Tariff Threat Tests Alliance

The Core Dispute: Unfulfilled Investment Pledges

Parallel Tensions Complicate Talks

A Diplomatic Push to Avert a Crisis

Vietnam and the EU Elevate Ties to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership

Context and Why This Upgrade Matters

Where the New Agenda Expands: Critical Materials, Supply Chains, Digital, and High-Value Investment

Security and Defense Cooperation: From Dialogue to Capability Building

Climate, Energy Transition, and Carbon Markets: JETP, Net Zero, and Regional Connectivity

People-to-People and Skills: Education, Erasmus+, Research, and Mobility Facilitation

Putin Praises UAE's Mediation in Ukraine Conflict

UAE's Central Role in Negotiations

Expanding the Agenda: Mideast and Economic Ties

US Shutdown Looms as Lawmakers Strike Partial Spending Deal

What the New Spending Deal Covers

A Weekend Shutdown Remains Possible

Immigration Policy at the Heart of DHS Stalemate

Oil Prices Hold Near Multi-Month Peaks as Geopolitical Risk Premium Builds

Middle East Tensions Anchor Oil Near Recent Highs

Trump’s Iran Stance Fuels Risk Premium

Washington Diplomacy Signals Caution, Not Escalation

Supply Side Factors Add To Market Tightness

Outlook Balances Risk And Restraint

Source: Reuters

Trading Day: Volatility Returns as Geopolitics and AI Fears Shake Global Markets

Geopolitical Risk Reignites Market Volatility

Commodity Frenzy Shows Signs of Strain

Tech Stocks Hit by AI Return Anxiety

Powell’s Silence Adds Another Layer of Uncertainty

Cross-Asset Repricing Reflects Fragile Sentiment

Volatility as a Structural Feature, Not an Anomaly

Source: Reuters

Asia Markets Swing on Fed Leadership Speculation, Still Poised for Strongest Monthly Gain Since 2022

Asian Stocks Falter After Strong Monthly Run

US Policy Signals Drive Global Market Jitters

Wall Street Tech Selloff Spills Into Asia

Japan Data Eases Pressure on the BOJ

Commodities And Crypto Remain Volatile

Best Month In Years, But Volatility Lingers

Source: Reuters

Risk Disclosure