Canada Lowers Tariffs On Chinese EVs, Bringing Global Price Competition Closer Than Ever

Economic

Summary:

Canada’s decision to sharply reduce tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles signals a meaningful shift in global trade dynamics, narrowing barriers to entry for low-cost Chinese EVs while reshaping the balance between agricultural gains and industrial concerns...

A Sharp Policy Reversal In North American Trade

Canada and China have announced a major recalibration of their trade relationship following high-level talks in Beijing, a move that carries significant implications for global electric vehicle markets. At the center of the agreement is Canada’s decision to reduce tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles from 100% to approximately 6.1%, while maintaining import quotas. This represents a dramatic departure from the protectionist stance adopted at the end of 2024, when Ottawa mirrored US policy by effectively closing its market to Chinese EVs.

The earlier tariff regime had rendered Chinese electric vehicles commercially unviable in Canada, a policy aimed at shielding domestic manufacturers. China’s response was swift and severe, imposing an 84% tariff on Canadian canola, a move that disrupted a multi-billion-dollar export sector. The new agreement reverses much of that escalation and resets bilateral trade conditions.

Import Quotas And Market Scale

Under the revised framework, Canada will allow up to 49,000 Chinese electric vehicles to enter its market each year at the reduced tariff rate. By the fifth year of the agreement, this quota will rise to 70,000 vehicles. Prime Minister Mark Carney noted that this volume is broadly equivalent to China’s EV export levels to Canada in 2023, the final year before tariffs were imposed.

Despite the scale of the tariff cut, the absolute market impact remains constrained by quotas. Canadian consumers purchased nearly 1.9 million vehicles last year, meaning Chinese EVs will continue to account for only a small fraction of total sales. The arrangement therefore reflects a controlled reopening rather than full market liberalization, linking access to regulatory limits rather than unfettered competition.

Agricultural Relief And Diplomatic Reset

In exchange, China will lower tariffs on Canadian canola to around 15% from March 1, significantly improving market access for Canadian farmers. This adjustment eases pressure on an export industry that had been effectively blocked following China’s retaliatory measures. The timing and scope of the tariff reduction align with broader efforts to repair strained relations, marking the first visit by a Canadian prime minister to Beijing in nearly a decade.

The connection between agricultural relief and automotive concessions is transactional in structure. Improved access for Canadian farm products coincides with eased entry for Chinese industrial exports, illustrating how sector-specific trade barriers are being rebalanced rather than removed outright.

Industrial Concerns And Domestic Opposition

Not all stakeholders have welcomed the agreement. Canadian auto workers and industry observers have expressed concern that an influx of competitively priced Chinese EVs could intensify pressure in an already challenging market. Ontario Premier Doug Ford publicly opposed lifting the tariffs ahead of the final negotiations, underscoring domestic political resistance tied to employment and industrial policy.

These concerns reflect an association between increased foreign competition and perceived risks to domestic manufacturing, even as overall import volumes remain capped. The debate highlights tensions between consumer affordability, industrial protection, and long-term competitiveness.

Investment Expectations And Climate Strategy

Prime Minister Carney has argued that the agreement could encourage significant Chinese investment in Canada’s automotive sector, potentially generating jobs while supporting national climate objectives. He emphasized that building a competitive domestic EV industry requires learning from innovative partners, accessing established supply chains, and expanding domestic demand.

This perspective frames tariff reduction as a strategic lever rather than a concession, linking foreign participation with technology transfer and market development. Whether such investment materializes will depend on regulatory conditions and corporate strategy rather than tariff levels alone.

Implications For The United States And Global Markets

The agreement is likely to disappoint the administration of US President Donald Trump, given Washington’s continued hardline stance on Chinese EV imports. At the same time, US soybean farmers affected by retaliatory tariffs may view Canada’s approach as a potential template for easing trade tensions through sectoral compromise.

More broadly, Canada’s decision brings the prospect of widespread availability of low-cost Chinese electric vehicles closer to reality. While quotas limit immediate impact, the symbolic shift signals that barriers surrounding Chinese EV exports are becoming more permeable. As similar adjustments emerge beyond Europe and into North America, the global EV market appears to be moving toward a phase where price competition from Chinese manufacturers is no longer a distant possibility but an increasingly tangible presence.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Diverging Risk Perceptions Between The US And The Rest Of The World

Entering 2026, business leaders around the world share a heightened sense of caution, yet their priorities differ markedly by region. According to the latest survey released by The Conference Board, which gathered responses from more than 1,700 CEOs across North America, Europe, and Asia, executives in the United States and their global peers are interpreting economic risks through different lenses.

In the United States, 43% of CEOs ranked economic uncertainty as the most serious threat for 2026, placing it ahead of recession concerns, which were cited by 35%. Globally, the pattern is reversed. Economic recession emerged as the primary concern for 36% of CEOs worldwide, while economic uncertainty followed at 29%. This contrast highlights how regional economic conditions and policy environments shape executive sentiment, rather than reflecting a uniform global outlook.

Pressure On Profitability And Business Model Transformation

Dana M. Peterson, Chief Economist at The Conference Board, noted that CEOs are facing a convergence of pressures that are weighing on profitability and growth expectations. At the same time, these pressures are closely linked with an acceleration in business model transformation. Rather than reacting defensively, many executives are using the current environment as a trigger to rethink how their organizations operate.

In the United States, 60% of CEOs identified changes to business models as their top priority for improving profitability. This emphasis suggests that margin pressure is not being viewed as a temporary fluctuation but as a structural challenge that requires strategic adjustment rather than short-term cost control alone.

Labor Market Tensions And Wage Expectations

Despite signs of cooling in the labor market, US workers continue to retain significant bargaining power over compensation. Around 27% of US CEOs cited rising wage expectations as a key recruitment challenge. This figure stands noticeably higher than in Asia, at 19%, and Europe, at 15%.

The persistence of wage pressure appears closely linked with tight labor conditions in specific sectors rather than overall employment levels. This relationship reflects an alignment between skill shortages and compensation expectations, rather than a generalized labor shortage across the economy.

Artificial Intelligence And The Question Of Returns

Artificial intelligence remains a central theme in executive decision-making, though enthusiasm is increasingly tempered by concerns over measurable outcomes. For 2026, the primary AI-related concern among CEOs is the ability to assess investment effectiveness. In the United States, 46% of CEOs emphasized the need to improve data quality and availability to better measure AI return on investment, compared with 33% globally.

Notably, US CEOs also expressed greater skepticism about AI’s near-term impact. About 38% believe AI will negatively affect their companies in the coming year, citing social, demographic, and technological disruptions. Among global CEOs, this figure stands at 30%. This outlook reflects an association between rapid AI deployment and organizational disruption, rather than a rejection of AI as a long-term growth driver.

Workforce Reductions And Structural Shifts Linked To AI

Concerns around AI are reinforced by findings from a separate study conducted by recruitment firm LHH, part of the Adecco Group. Surveying 2,000 senior managers across 13 countries, including the US, Canada, Japan, and major European economies, the study found that 46% of companies have already reduced headcount as AI adoption has advanced. A further 54% expect to require fewer employees over the next five years.

According to Michaël Chambon, Head of Career Transformation at LHH France, AI is reshaping labor market dynamics at a fundamental level. He also warned that many workers continue to underestimate the scale of change AI may bring to required skills and long-term career paths. The alignment between AI deployment and workforce restructuring reflects a direct organizational response to productivity shifts rather than short-term cyclical adjustments.

Corporate Bankruptcies And A Tough Operating Environment

The broader economic backdrop has added to executive anxiety, particularly in the United States. Corporate bankruptcies in 2025 reached their highest level since the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis. Data from S&P Global Market Intelligence show that at least 717 US companies filed for bankruptcy protection by the end of November 2025, representing a 14% increase year on year and the highest total since 2010.

High-profile bankruptcies have spanned multiple sectors, including pharmacy chain Rite Aid, genetic testing company 23andMe, casual dining brand Hooters, and low-cost carrier Spirit Airlines. The breadth of affected industries indicates that financial stress is widespread rather than concentrated, reflecting prolonged inflation, elevated interest rates, and a rigid tariff environment.

Cybersecurity And Geopolitical Risk Awareness

Cyberattacks were identified as the leading geopolitical risk, with 54% of US CEOs and 47% of global CEOs ranking them as a top concern. Other geopolitical risks, including political instability and armed conflict, followed closely.

Perceptions of conflict risk vary significantly by region. While conflict is not a primary concern for US CEOs, executives in Japan ranked Asia-Pacific conflict as their top geopolitical risk. In Europe, conflict on the continent was ranked third. These differences reflect regional exposure and strategic priorities rather than a shared global assessment of geopolitical threats.

Preferred Markets For Expansion Despite Uncertainty

Despite widespread concern, executives continue to identify opportunities for growth. The United States and Canada remain the most favored regions for market expansion, with 53% of survey respondents selecting them as priority destinations. This preference suggests that, even amid uncertainty and risk, North America is still viewed as offering relative stability, scale, and long-term growth potential.

Overall, the survey reveals a complex executive mindset heading into 2026. CEOs are balancing heightened economic and technological risks with a strong push toward strategic reinvention, underscoring a shift from short-term caution to longer-term structural adaptation.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Commodity

Economic

Azerbaijan’s Gas Deliveries Enter A New Phase

Azerbaijan has officially begun supplying natural gas to Germany and Austria, marking a significant expansion in its presence within the European energy market. This development represents a further step in Europe’s broader effort to diversify energy sources following the Ukraine conflict and the resulting disruption to traditional supply routes.

According to an announcement on January 16, the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic, Socar, is transporting gas via the Trans Adriatic Pipeline. This route runs from the Turkey Greece border through Greece and Albania, crosses the Adriatic Sea to Italy, and then continues northward into Central Europe. The use of this corridor underscores the strategic importance of Southern European transit infrastructure in reshaping Europe’s gas flows.

Socar stated that deliveries routed through Italy to Germany and Austria have expanded Azerbaijan’s gas export footprint in Europe, raising the total number of European importing countries to 16. This expansion reflects a clear linkage between Europe’s diversification policy and Azerbaijan’s ambition to position itself as a long-term supplier rather than a marginal alternative.

Long-Term Contracts And Supply Volumes

The latest shipments follow a ten-year gas supply agreement signed in June 2025 between Socar and Germany’s energy company Sefe. Under the contract, Azerbaijan is set to deliver 1.5 billion cubic meters of gas per year to Germany. Austria is expected to receive up to approximately one billion cubic meters annually.

In 2025, Azerbaijan exported a total of 12.8 billion cubic meters of natural gas to Europe. While this figure highlights steady growth, analysts note that further increases will depend on the expansion of pipeline capacity and additional investment in upstream and midstream energy projects. The relationship between export growth and infrastructure development is therefore conditional, as physical transport limits constrain supply regardless of contractual demand.

Kazakhstan’s Rising Role In Europe’s Oil Supply

Alongside Azerbaijan’s gas expansion, Kazakhstan is strengthening its position as an alternative oil supplier to Europe, particularly Germany. On January 16, Kazakhstan’s state-owned oil and gas company KazMunayGas announced plans to increase crude oil exports to Germany to around 2.5 million tonnes in 2026, up from 2.146 million tonnes in the previous year.

Data from pipeline operator KazTransOil show that approximately 2.146 million tonnes of Kazakh oil were delivered to Germany via the Druzhba pipeline in 2025, representing a 44% increase compared with the year before. This growth is closely associated with Germany’s strategic decision to replace Russian oil supplies rather than with short-term market fluctuations.

Strategic Importance For Germany’s Energy Security

Kazakhstan’s role has become particularly significant for Germany’s Schwedt refinery in Brandenburg, which relies heavily on stable crude oil imports. Since Russia launched its military operation in Ukraine, Germany has accelerated efforts to diversify oil imports, with Kazakhstan emerging as a key partner in ensuring supply continuity.

This shift illustrates a structural reorientation of Germany’s energy strategy, where long-term supply security has taken precedence over historical trade patterns. The growing involvement of both Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan reflects a broader realignment of Europe’s energy architecture, shaped by geopolitical considerations and reinforced through infrastructure and long-term contracts.

Overall, the expanding energy ties with Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan highlight Europe’s ongoing transition toward a more diversified and resilient energy supply system, one that increasingly integrates producers from the Caspian region into its long-term planning.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

King Ten

Remarks of Officials

Economic

Political

France is calling on the European Union to deploy a powerful trade defense tool after U.S. President Donald Trump announced new tariffs tied to his demand for the purchase of Greenland.

President Emmanuel Macron intends to ask the EU to activate its anti-coercion instrument in response to Trump's plan for a 10% tariff on goods from eight European countries, including France, effective February 1. Sources close to the French president confirmed the request, adding that Macron has been discussing the matter with other European leaders after calling the tariff threat "unacceptable."

Trump Links New Tariffs to Greenland Purchase

The escalating trade dispute hinges on an unusual condition. In a social media post, Trump stated the tariff rate would increase to 25% in June unless an agreement is reached for the "Complete and Total purchase of Greenland."

This declaration has cast a shadow over existing trade relations between Washington and Brussels. According to a source familiar with Macron's thinking, linking tariffs to the Greenland issue calls into question a major trade agreement finalized between the EU and the U.S. last year.

US-EU Trade Deal on the Brink of Collapse

The transatlantic trade agreement, which has been partially implemented, now faces an uncertain future as it still requires parliamentary approval. Following Trump's announcement, that approval seems highly unlikely.

Manfred Weber, leader of the European People's Party—the largest political group in the European Parliament—stated on Saturday that ratifying the EU-US trade deal is no longer feasible.

EU ambassadors from member states are set to meet on Sunday to formulate the bloc's official response.

European Leaders Rally for a Unified Response

Across Europe, leaders are mobilizing to develop a coordinated strategy. Germany's SPD parliamentary group, part of Chancellor Friedrich Merz's governing coalition, has called on the European Commission to devise "concrete countermeasures" against the United States. While the German government is reportedly weighing all its options, it has not yet decided on a specific course of action.

Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo warned that the EU "has the means to respond," though he hopes to avoid an escalation. Speaking to YLE radio, Orpo revealed he has requested an emergency European Council meeting to ensure European nations, alongside Denmark, present a united front.

What is the EU's Anti-Coercion Instrument?

The anti-coercion instrument is a powerful but so far unused tool in the EU's trade arsenal. It was designed to deter and counteract coercive economic measures by other countries attempting to influence EU policy.

If activated, the EU could impose a range of countermeasures, including:

• Introducing new tariffs or taxes on specific companies.

• Imposing restrictions on investment within the EU.

• Blocking businesses from bidding on public contracts.

• Limiting access to certain sectors of the EU market.

This is not the first time its use has been considered. Macron previously explored activating the tool during prolonged negotiations over other planned U.S. tariffs but ultimately decided against it.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

King Ten

Latest news on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Middle East Situation

Political

The Trump administration is reportedly asking nations to contribute at least $1 billion to secure a permanent seat on a proposed "Board of Peace" for the Gaza Strip, according to a report from Bloomberg.

US allies and regional partners have been briefed on the plan, which is part of a broader diplomatic push to shape Gaza's future following the conflict between Israel and Hamas. The primary goal of the hefty financial requirement is to ensure participating countries have a substantial stake in stabilizing the territory and funding its long-term redevelopment.

The proposed Board of Peace aims to oversee the reconstruction of Gaza, which has seen extensive devastation from the conflict.

Funding, Control, and International Concerns

Washington's position is that spreading the financial burden is essential to prevent American taxpayers from covering the majority of reconstruction costs. This argument comes after years of the U.S. providing billions in weaponry and aid to Israel, which contributed to the destruction in Palestinian areas.

A significant issue for potential partners has emerged from the initial proposal. According to officials familiar with the discussions, the draft suggests that President Trump would personally control the funds. This detail is considered a non-starter for most countries that might otherwise consider joining the board.

Membership Rules and Board Charter

The Times of Israel, which obtained a copy of the board's draft charter, outlined the specific terms for membership:

• Standard Term: Member states serve a term of no more than three years, which can be renewed by the Chairman (Trump).

• Permanent Seat: The three-year term limit does not apply to member states that contribute over $1 billion in cash within the first year.

This structure effectively creates a pay-to-play system for a permanent role in overseeing Gaza's future.

Who's on the Board? A Roster of Key Figures

The White House has announced the "founding executive board" members, a group that blends political influence with financial expertise. The board, chaired by Trump, will oversee a Palestinian technocratic body called the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG), led by former Palestinian Authority official Ali Abdel Hamid Shaath.

The board's founding members include:

• Marco Rubio, US Secretary of State

• Steve Witkoff, Presidential Special Envoy

• Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law

• Tony Blair, former British Prime Minister

• Marc Rowan, Private Equity Executive

• Ajay Banga, World Bank President

• Robert Gabriel, US National Security Adviser

Figure 1: The appointment of former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair (left, with Donald Trump) to the Gaza board has drawn public criticism.

Lingering Doubts Over Governance and Trust

An anonymous official told Bloomberg that nearly every dollar raised would be used "to execute its mandate" of rebuilding and stabilizing Gaza.

However, with Palestinian representation largely confined to the committee being overseen by the international board, many Gazans are expected to remain deeply skeptical of the US-controlled initiative. The structure raises immediate questions about local autonomy and whether the board will truly serve the interests of the people it is meant to help.

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Kevin Morgan

Remarks of Officials

Economic

Central Bank

Political

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett’s potential candidacy for Federal Reserve Chair is now in doubt after President Donald Trump publicly indicated he prefers to keep Hassett in his current role.

The President's reluctance complicates the search for a successor to current Fed Chair Jerome Powell. During a recent White House event, Trump directly told Hassett, "I actually want to keep you where you are, if you want to know the truth."

Speaking on Fox News, Hassett confirmed the ongoing discussion. "From the beginning, he and I have talked about whether it's better for me to be here in the West Wing or over at the Fed," he said. "I don't think he's made a final call on that."

The Shifting Field of Fed Candidates

Hassett was once considered a frontrunner for the top job at the central bank. The race is now widely seen as a four-person contest, with the other key contenders being Fed Governor Christopher Waller, former governor Kevin Warsh, and BlackRock Inc. executive Rick Rieder.

According to people familiar with the matter, Rieder's candidacy has recently gained significant momentum. Some believe he may face an easier path to confirmation in the Senate, a crucial factor in the current political climate.

Political Headwinds and a Fed Investigation

The nomination process is unfolding under a cloud of controversy. A criminal probe targeting the Federal Reserve and Jerome Powell over the remodeling of the central bank's headquarters has sparked political backlash.

Powell has accused the Justice Department of initiating the investigation to pressure the Fed into cutting interest rates. The fallout has reached Congress, with influential lawmakers like Senate Banking Committee member Thom Tillis warning that any nominee from President Trump will be subjected to intense scrutiny.

Hassett Defers to the President

In his Sunday interview, Hassett acknowledged the situation and deferred to the President's judgment. "There are a lot of great candidates, and it could well be that the president's right to make the decision that this is the best place for me right now," he stated, referring to his post at the White House.

Hassett added that he was "humbled and gratified" by Trump's comments, describing the president as "such a good guy."

The search for the next Fed Chair is being led by Bessent, who Trump has confirmed has removed himself from consideration for the role. Jerome Powell's term as head of the central bank is set to end on May 15.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Inflation Trends And The 2025 Slowdown

Russia entered 2026 following a notable moderation in inflation over the previous year. According to data from the Federal State Statistics Service Rosstat, headline inflation for 2025 stood at 5.59%, a substantial decline from 9.52% in 2024, 7.42% in 2023, and 11.94% in 2022. This outcome came in below earlier official projections, indicating that price pressures eased more quickly than policymakers had anticipated.

Both major forecasting institutions adjusted their expectations during 2025. In October, the Central Bank of Russia projected inflation in the range of 6.5% to 7%, while the Ministry of Economic Development estimated 6.8% in its September forecast. The final outcome suggests that monetary tightening and weaker domestic demand were closely associated with slower price growth across much of the year.

Early 2026 Signals A Rebound In Price Growth

Despite the improvement recorded in 2025, inflationary pressure resurfaced at the start of 2026. Between January 1 and January 12, consumer prices rose by 0.62%. For the full month of January, the increase is estimated at 1.23%, which corresponds to an annualized pace of approximately 6.26%.

A key factor influencing this early-year acceleration is the increase in the value-added tax, which rose from 20% to 22% effective January 1, 2026. The timing and magnitude of the price increases suggest a strong linkage between administrative tax adjustments and short-term inflation dynamics, rather than a purely demand-driven surge.

Monetary Policy Shift And Inflation Targets

On December 19, the Central Bank of Russia reduced its key policy rate by 50 basis points to 16%, marking a shift away from an extended period of tight monetary policy. The rate cut reflects confidence that inflation can be steered back toward target levels without maintaining maximum restraint.

Looking ahead, the central bank projects inflation in 2026 to remain within a 4% to 5% range. The Ministry of Economic Development is slightly more optimistic, forecasting inflation at 4% based on its September outlook. These projections imply that policymakers view the early-2026 price spike as manageable within the existing policy framework rather than as a signal of sustained overheating.

Food Prices And Persistent Cost Pressures

Food prices continued to play a significant role in shaping inflation patterns. In December 2025, food prices rose by 0.43%, bringing the total increase for the year to 5.24%, compared with 11.05% in 2024. This deceleration aligns with broader inflation trends, although price levels remain elevated for many households.

Within this category, fruit and vegetable prices increased by 1.56% in December and by 8.80% over the full year, down from a sharp 22.09% rise in 2024. Certain items recorded much stronger gains in 2025, including frozen fish, which rose by 16.98%, alcoholic beverages at 11.12%, and bread and bakery products, also up 11.12%. These increases indicate uneven price adjustment across food subcategories rather than a uniform slowdown.

Non-Food Goods And Diverging Price Movements

Prices for non-food goods rose by 0.34% in December 2025 and by 2.99% over the year, compared with a 6.12% increase in 2024. Fuel prices remained a notable source of upward pressure, with gasoline prices increasing by 10.78% in 2025. Pharmaceutical products rose by 9.88%, while tobacco products increased by 7.08%.

At the same time, several durable goods categories experienced price declines. Television and radio products fell by 8.53%, and household appliances declined by 4.96% over the year. This divergence reflects differing supply conditions and consumer demand patterns, with discretionary goods showing weaker pricing power.

Services Inflation And Core Price Dynamics

Service prices rose by an average of 0.15% in December and increased by 9.30% over the course of 2025, down from 11.52% in 2024. While the pace has eased, services inflation remains elevated relative to goods, highlighting ongoing cost pressures in labor-intensive sectors.

Core consumer price inflation, which excludes items affected by seasonal and administrative factors, reached 100.37% in December 2025 and 105.44% for the year as a whole, compared with 108.93% in 2024. The decline in core inflation suggests a broader moderation in underlying price momentum, even as headline figures fluctuate due to tax and policy changes.

Russia’s inflation profile entering 2026 presents a mixed picture. The sharp deceleration achieved in 2025 demonstrates the effectiveness of prolonged monetary tightening, yet early-2026 data reveal renewed price pressure linked to fiscal adjustments and sector-specific dynamics. Whether inflation stabilizes within the official 4% to 5% target range will depend on the interaction between tax policy, monetary easing, and household demand over the coming months.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

Canada Lowers Tariffs On Chinese EVs, Bringing Global Price Competition Closer Than Ever

A Sharp Policy Reversal In North American Trade

Import Quotas And Market Scale

Agricultural Relief And Diplomatic Reset

Industrial Concerns And Domestic Opposition

Investment Expectations And Climate Strategy

Implications For The United States And Global Markets

Global CEOs’ Top Strategic Concerns Heading Into 2026

Diverging Risk Perceptions Between The US And The Rest Of The World

Pressure On Profitability And Business Model Transformation

Labor Market Tensions And Wage Expectations

Artificial Intelligence And The Question Of Returns

Workforce Reductions And Structural Shifts Linked To AI

Corporate Bankruptcies And A Tough Operating Environment

Cybersecurity And Geopolitical Risk Awareness

Preferred Markets For Expansion Despite Uncertainty

Azerbaijan And Kazakhstan Expand Energy Supplies To Europe

Azerbaijan’s Gas Deliveries Enter A New Phase

Long-Term Contracts And Supply Volumes

Kazakhstan’s Rising Role In Europe’s Oil Supply

Strategic Importance For Germany’s Energy Security

France Pushes EU Trade Weapon Against US Greenland Tariffs

Trump Links New Tariffs to Greenland Purchase

US-EU Trade Deal on the Brink of Collapse

European Leaders Rally for a Unified Response

What is the EU's Anti-Coercion Instrument?

Trump Demands $1B Buy-In for Gaza 'Board of Peace' Seat

The proposed Board of Peace aims to oversee the reconstruction of Gaza, which has seen extensive devastation from the conflict.

Funding, Control, and International Concerns

Membership Rules and Board Charter

Who's on the Board? A Roster of Key Figures

Figure 1: The appointment of former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair (left, with Donald Trump) to the Gaza board has drawn public criticism.

Lingering Doubts Over Governance and Trust

Trump Hints Hassett to Stay, Shaking Up Fed Chair Race

The Shifting Field of Fed Candidates

Political Headwinds and a Fed Investigation

Hassett Defers to the President

Russia: Inflation Pressures Re-Emerge At The Start Of 2026

Inflation Trends And The 2025 Slowdown

Early 2026 Signals A Rebound In Price Growth

Monetary Policy Shift And Inflation Targets

Food Prices And Persistent Cost Pressures

Non-Food Goods And Diverging Price Movements

Services Inflation And Core Price Dynamics

Risk Disclosure