Bitcoin Likely to Extend Correction With Lower Support Levels in Focus

Cryptocurrency

Summary:

Bitcoin’s correction deepens after losing $100K and key Fib levels. Sellers dominate, with next supports at $93.6K and $85–86K. Trend stays bearish unless BTC reclaims $105–106K.

Bitcoin has slipped below the key level of 100,000 as selling pressure has increased over the past few days. It has also broken below the 0.50 Fibonacci correction level at 99,600, which traders have watched for months. This zone acted as an important balance area and a decision point for the uptrend that ran from April to October.

The drop toward 97,500 after the break shows that sellers still guide the market. Rising volume on the daily chart supports this view and signals that the move has a more institutional character rather than random selling.

Short-term moving averages show a clear downward setup. The 8-day EMA stays below the 21-day EMA, and both averages slope lower. BTC trades well under these two short-term averages and also under the 3-month EMA near the 110k area. This confirms a firm downward trend on the daily chart, and any bounce from here remains an intermediate move inside this broader decline.

For now, the first resistance in any rebound sits in the 99,500 to 100,000 band. Above that, the 105,000 to 106,000 band acts as the key threshold that aligns with the neckline. Until the price climbs back above both these zones, upward moves will mainly serve as selling opportunities from a technical perspective.

Market Structure Shows Where The Declines May Slow

The Shoulder Over Shoulder pattern on the daily chart now looks complete. The head of the pattern sits near the peak around 124,000, and the left and right shoulders formed in the 112,000 to 114,000 area. After the price moved below the 105,500 to 106,500 range, which acts as the neckline, BTC made several attempts to climb back into this zone. Each attempt met with fresh selling pressure and the price moved lower again.

This behaviour shows that the retest phase after the breakout has already played out and the downside risks remain in place from a technical point of view.

Bitcoin Likely to Extend Correction With Lower Support Levels in Focus_1

The first strong support on the way down sits in the 93,600 to 93,700 band. This is the Fib 0.618 retracement that we highlighted earlier. Once the price slipped below the 0.50 level, the chance of a move toward this zone grew in a clear way, especially with the rise in volume. This band needs close attention because it often acts as both Fibonacci support and an intermediate pause during sideways phases over the past few months. It may attract short-term buyers again.

If this area gives way, the next level on the radar is the 85,000 to 86,000 region. This aligns with the Fib 0.786 retracement and the theoretical target of the Shoulder Over Shoulder pattern. It forms a critical support cluster where the market may attempt to search for a deeper and more meaningful bottom, and where medium-term buyers may step in again.

The daily Stochastic RSI stays in the oversold zone and moves sideways. This behaviour is common during a downtrend. It signals pressure rather than an automatic pivot. A bottom-up turn in the Stochastic RSI along with the price holding firm near 93,600 could set the stage for a sharp short-term reaction rally. This signal has not appeared yet. Indicators point to continued weakness and the price action supports the same view.

Bitcoin’s Weekly Outlook

On the weekly chart, the wider bullish channel that Bitcoin has followed since early 2023 remains in place. Even so, the price has entered a sharper corrective phase after slipping below the middle band of this channel. The 1.618 Fibonacci extension level at 102060 has worked as support and as a pivot zone in recent weeks.

The current weekly candle sits under this level, which shows that the correction now carries weight on both the daily and weekly time frames.

Bitcoin Likely to Extend Correction With Lower Support Levels in Focus_2

On the moving averages front, the price has stayed under the 8 and 21 week EMAs for a month, and the averages have moved into a negative crossover. This shows that the trend has entered a slowdown phase. If the 88 to 90 thousand band also gives way, the decline can stretch toward the 85 to 86 thousand region, which aligns with both the OBO target and the channel structure.

The weekly Stochastic RSI has slipped deeper into oversold territory. When this indicator finishes its move at the bottom and turns upward, it often signals the early stages of a new medium-term bullish wave. At this point, though, both the daily and weekly charts show that the price is still drifting toward lower support, which means the bottom formation has not formed. For now, the weekly indicator mainly shows that the correction phase continues.

Bitcoin’s Future Outlook

The short-term direction for Bitcoin sits below the 99,500 to 100,000 band. As long as the price stays under this zone, the chart signals a move toward the Fib 0.618 support near 93,600. The area can trigger short-lived reactions, yet the broader bearish setup stays in place unless the price delivers firm daily or weekly closes above the neckline at 105,000 to 106,000.

The market still moves under the weight of the OBO pattern and remains in a sharp intermediate correction inside the wider bullish cycle. Bitcoin will need higher lows and a clear reversal structure on both the daily and weekly charts before the market can breathe again.

Source: investing

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Adam

Commodity

Silver has embarked on a wild rollercoaster ride, with the market seeing renewed selling pressure after hitting critical resistance above $54 an ounce overnight.

In the last seven sessions, silver managed to recover all of its losses from last month’s sharp selloff, which saw prices drop 16% in two weeks.

Overnight, spot silver rallied to $54.39 an ounce; however, the market has been unable to hold its gains and was hit with a wave of selling at the start of the North American trading session. Spot silver last traded at $52.75 an ounce, down nearly 1% on the day.

Although silver’s price action has formed a critical double top, sentiment in the marketplace remains relatively bullish. Jim Wyckoff, Senior Market Analyst at Kitco.com, said he sees the selloff as routine profit-taking.

Fawad Razaqzada, Market Analyst at FOREX.com, said he expects silver to be bought on dips.

“This could be a false signal, so we should be careful in drawing any conclusions from it yet. A double top without a break of the neckline is not of itself a significantly bearish sign, but a warning for the late buyers, nonetheless. As a minimum, silver will need to break and close below $50 for me to turn decisively bearish,” he said.

Nick Cawley, Market Analyst for Solomon Global, said that he also does not see a lot of technical chart damage in silver’s selling pressure.

“While a double top can be a negative chart pattern, I don't see any negative on the daily silver chart. A confirmation of a double top would need to see the neckline around $47 broken and the recent swing low around $45.50. The daily chart is currently showing a series of seven higher lows and higher highs while the MACD indicator has turned higher,” he said.

According to analysts, the entire precious metals sector has been benefiting from growing expectations that the slowing economy will force the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates next month and through 2026.

“Investors are increasingly seeking tangible assets supported by tight supply amid concerns over economic worries — particularly in the US, where the fiscal debt focus will resurface as the government reopens,” said Ole Hansen, Head of Commodity Strategy at Saxo Bank.

Silver’s recent recovery has significantly outperformed gold, with the gold/silver ratio falling to a five-week low of 79.59. Some analysts note that, along with bullish fundamentals as a monetary metal, silver is also benefiting as an industrial metal after it was designated a critical metal in the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) 2025 List.

In a recent interview with Kitco News, Matthew Piggott, Director of Gold and Silver at Metals Focus, said that even if the global economy slows, industrial consumption should continue to provide solid support for silver.

Growing industrial demand has created significant supply deficits in the silver market for the last five years, and that is unlikely to change anytime soon. Piggott said he suspects the world economy would have to see a substantial slowdown to reduce industrial demand enough to balance the market.

David Morrison, Senior Market Analyst at Trade Nation, said that while silver still has plenty of potential, investors should be mindful of its volatility.

“Its daily MACD has turned up sharply, suggesting that there’s strong upside momentum. But given the size and speed of this latest rally, there must be concerns that another pullback may be on its way. However one looks at it, silver is living up to its reputation as gold’s unruly sibling,” he said.

Commodity analysts at TD Securities said they don’t expect silver to have enough momentum to hit all-time highs. They described the current resurgence as short-term technical buying.

“The call spread was rolled over in the last session, reducing market pressures in the immediate term. Still, while these flows were technical in nature, they have lifted prices back towards ATHs — could this price action now reignite the speculative fervor in precious metals?” the analysts said. “There are very few historical precedents to lean on, but in no instance has this set-up subsequently led to large-scale buying activity over the following month.”

Source: kitco

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Olivia Brooks

Economic

Treasuries stalled as traders awaited a raft of delayed economic data with the potential to revive expectations for Federal Reserve interest-rate cuts.

Yields were broadly flat across most maturities mid-morning in New York Friday after falling toward their lowest levels of the week earlier in the session. The five-year rate reached 3.65%, the lowest level since Oct. 29, when the Fed cut rates for the second straight time.

Since then, expectations for a third rate cut in December have faded, with derivatives this week pricing in less than 50% chance of a move.

However bond traders are anticipating that the resumption of US government economic data, suspended during the six-week US government shutdown, may support a December cut, even as several Fed officials this week have said they're opposed to one.

"The market has priced in a weaker labor market story — not terrible but weak," said Ed Al-Hussainy, a portfolio manager at Columbia Threadneedle Investments. "Unless inflation runs away, it's difficult to take out the easing expectations."

The outlook for US economic data that weren't published during the shutdown from Oct. 1 to Nov. 12 remains unclear. Release dates haven't been announced yet, and there's been conflicting guidance on whether some reports will be missed. For example, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett Nov. 13 said the October jobs report will be released without the unemployment rate, a day after the White House said the jobs report and consumer price index for October were unlikely to be released.

Hassett also said about 60,000 job losses were possible because of the shutdown. The Fed cut interest rates in September and October in response to signs of weakness in US employment, even as inflation continues to exceed its target.

Accordingly, traders are anticipating that worsening labor-market conditions can win over the several Fed officials who've said cutting rates again in December would be a mistake. Most recently, Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid Friday said additional interest-rate cuts could do more to ingrain higher inflation than shore up the labor market.

In the Treasury options market, where wagers on the 10-year note's yield falling below 4% in coming weeks have piled up. The 10-year last traded below 4% on Oct. 29, before Fed Chair Jerome Powell said a December rate cut was far from certain.

Bond traders also are mindful of the potential for a pause in Fed rate cuts to hurt demand for risky assets and stoke demand for safer Treasuries, which might otherwise suffer from a Fed pause. The outlook for lower rates has helped lift US equity benchmarks to record highs in the past month, and stretched valuations for several giant technology companies have drawn warnings from investors and Wall Street CEOs.

"If you tell the markets that there will be no cuts, risk markets will unwind. So it's tough to trade from the short side," Al-Hussainy said.

Treasury yields reached their highest levels of the day before US markets opened, when the UK government bond market was rocked by reports that the government will drop a proposed income tax increase. Long-dated UK yields climbed as much as 14 basis points and remained near session highs.

Source: Bloomberg Europe

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Stocks

There’s a fine line between a bubble and a market simply tripping over its own shoelaces when too many risk events collide at once. Right now, global equities feel less like 1999 mania and more like a high-speed convoy hitting a patch of converging hazards — AI funding math coming due, data-center capex that refuses to stay in its lane, geopolitics flaring, and bond markets twitching under the weight of the Fed’s hawkish recalibration. In this kind of traffic, even normal corrections look like smoke on the horizon.

But let’s start with the so-called AI bubble — the narrative du jour that refuses to die. You can practically hear the old-school market sages muttering that you only recognize a bubble in the rear-view mirror. And yet, the chatter today isn’t coming from the usual cranks; it’s bubbling up because expectations have sprinted well ahead of reality.

That alone doesn’t make this a ticking time bomb. It makes it what the early innings of every transformative tech cycle look like: investors pricing futures that haven’t been built yet.

The real fracture zone isn’t mystical; it’s steel, concrete, transformers, and debt. The data-center buildout remains the beating heart of the AI capex surge, and the industry is laying track faster than the revenue trains can realistically run on it. The OpenAI–Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) $100bn blueprint is a perfect example — only a tenth of that is actually committed, the other nine-tenths is vapor until demand proves itself and someone coughs up the financing.

For now, capacity is tight, not excessive. But plotted forward on any reasonable trajectory, supply catches up long before the monetization curve does.

Sam Altman practically admitted as much by pinning future revenue on products that don’t exist yet — enterprise expansions, cloud forays, robotics detours. That isn’t delusion; it’s the classic “we’ll grow into it” mantra that every capex-heavy revolution chants. But it also underscores the gulf between the cost of the buildout and the revenues needed to justify it. That’s the gap critics keep poking at — and they aren’t wrong to keep poking.

Still, handicapping growth is very different from claiming the technology will never pay its way. The deeper bubble risk lies not in the cranes and fiber lines but in the LLMs themselves: hallucinations, latency, and cost-to-run economics that, if left unresolved, could render wide swathes of AI chronically uneconomic. If that turns structural, then the capex overhang becomes a millstone. We just don’t know yet.

What we do know is that markets don’t wait patiently for clarity. If investors get spooked first — if the funding wheels wobble, if the AI debt machine hesitates — the selloff becomes its own self-fulfilling prophecy. That’s where the real correction risk lives: not in an implosion, but in a capital-rationing reset that forces weaker players to tap out.

OpenAI, Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR), the single-product darlings with extreme multiples? They’d feel the blade first. Google (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), sitting on Fort Knox balance sheets and distribution dominance, would simply absorb the oxygen that others can’t afford.

And that’s the nuance missing from the “AI bubble” hot takes. Yes, some names are hanging on P/E ratios that assume everything breaks right. Palantir at 250x is expecting a hero’s journey with no bad chapters. Some will require years — maybe a decade — to grow into those skins. But the megacaps? Their multiples aren’t even nosebleed by the standards of this decade. If anything, the concentration risk has masked how un-bubbly the broader tech complex actually looks.

Meanwhile, the picks-and-shovels trade — the chips — is still running flat-out. AMD (NASDAQ:AMD) flagging a $1tn annual AI silicon market by 2030, with Nvidia set to reprise its earnings blowtorch next week. Yes, chip stocks are brutally cyclical, and yes, a data-center slowdown would bite hard. But no one sees that slowdown in the windshield right now.

So are we living through bubble trouble, or just a garden-variety correction amplified by too many risk wires crossing at once? The truth sits somewhere in the middle. Parts of the AI complex are priced for perfection. Parts are priced as industrials-in-disguise. And parts — the data-center landlords, the chip vendors, the hyperscaler balance-sheet giants — are behaving nothing like a speculative bubble.

Call it what it is: a crowded runway with far too many planes trying to take off at once. The turbulence isn’t proof of a crash. It’s the predictable shake when the air currents of rate risk, capex math, valuation gravity, and AI ambition finally converge in the same pocket of sky.

Source: investing

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Economic

As Japanese authorities once again battle a slide in the yen, their efforts this time are struggling for traction, undermined by new prime minister Sanae Takaichi's promotion of advocates of big fiscal and monetary stimulus to key posts.

While Tokyo officials this week warned against sharp downward moves in the currency, maintaining the jawboning of previous administrations, their voices are increasingly competing with calls by new policy advisers preaching the benefits of a weak yen.

A proponent of expansionary fiscal and monetary policy, Takaichi filled seats in key government panels with advocates of big spending backed by low interest rates - policies that work to depreciate the yen's value.

For one, Takuji Aida, an economist who joined a panel on the government's growth strategy, stressed the benefits of a weak yen such as easing the blow to manufacturers from U.S. tariffs.

The reflationists' sanguine view on the weak yen contrasts with the concerns of previous administrations, who primarily focused on cost of living pressures caused by the currency's impact on imported inflation.

"The Takaichi administration hasn't escalated its warning, which suggests it is tolerating a weak yen," said Masafumi Yamamoto, chief currency strategist at Mizuho Securities.

"Given the administration doesn't seem to prioritise combatting a weak yen, it would take a slide below 155 per dollar for it to escalate verbal warnings and a fall below 160 to contemplate direct intervention in the market," he said.

To be sure, Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama warned on Wednesday that authorities were vigilant to "one-sided, sharp moves" in the exchange-rate market, adding the negative aspects of a weak yen have become more pronounced than the positives.

But the remarks failed to prop up the yen as they were short of more direct threats of currency intervention, such as that authorities were ready to take "decisive action."

Underscoring a lack of consensus within the administration, economic revitalisation minister, Minoru Kiuchi, said last month the weak yen had benefits to growth. On Tuesday, he said the boost to import costs from a weak yen was fading.

Such views have also helped fuel market expectations the Bank of Japan will be forced to go slow in raising interest rates, pushing the yen to a record low against the euro and a nine-month trough versus the U.S. dollar.

The dollar has risen about 5% against the yen since Takaichi won the ruling party's leadership race on October 4. It stood around 154.50 yen on Friday, after breaking a key milestone of 155 earlier this week.

INTERVENTION HURDLE HIGH

Japan last intervened in the currency market in July 2024 when the yen fell to a 38-year low of around 161.96 to the dollar. The BOJ also raised interest rates to 0.25% that month, causing the yen to strengthen to around 150 per dollar.

Such concerted action highlighted the concern then-premier Fumio Kishida had about a weak yen.

By contrast, Takaichi and her reflationist aides are fans of "Abenomics," a mix of big spending and bold monetary easing deployed in 2013. The policies helped reverse sharp yen rises blamed for prolonging deflation and economic stagnation.

Now, a weak yen has become a pain point for an economy that relies heavily on fuel and food imports. Yen declines have kept inflation above the BOJ's 2% target for well over three years, causing grumblings from households hit by rising living costs.

Mindful of broadening inflationary pressures, BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda signaled the chance of a hike as soon as next month.

But Takaichi and her finance minister both made clear their displeasure over a near-term rate hike, saying Japan has yet to see inflation durably achieve the BOJ's target.

Almost a year since its last rate hike in January, investors have taken comfort in selling yen on prospects the BOJ is unlikely to hike steadily at a set pace.

"There's a higher chance than initially thought that Takaichi's administration would favour reflationary policies," said Ryutaro Kono, chief Japan economist at BNP Paribas.

"Given the administration's policy stance as suggested by the recent personnel appointments, it's hard to project the BOJ accelerating its pace of rate hikes," said Kono, who now expects the bank to hike twice next year instead of three times.

If BOJ rate hikes were put on hold, the only remaining tool to counter yen falls would be currency intervention.

But getting consent from Washington may be tough as U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has repeatedly signaled that rate hikes are the best way to prop up the yen.

Former BOJ official Toru Sasaki expects Japan to hold off intervening unless the yen falls below 165 to the dollar.

"Conducting yen-buying intervention at a time Japan's real interest rates remain deeply negative would be wasting foreign reserves."

Source: reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Devin

Economic

The United States will slash its tariffs on goods from Switzerland to 15% from a crippling 39% under a new framework trade agreement, the Swiss government said on Friday.

The announcement followed U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer saying a deal between the two countries had been reached, adding that details would be announced later on Friday.

Richemont Chair Johann Rupert, who met President Donald Trump in the White House last week as part of a delegation of Swiss business executives, earlier had said he thought the punitive tariffs imposed by Washington were the result of a "misunderstanding" that would be cleared up quickly.

"The Swiss and the Americans are very much the same -- independent, don't like big government etc. etc., so I think this misunderstanding will be cleared up this week," Rupert told reporters after Richemont reported its latest results.

"I think we will hear more, from what I've gathered, we'll hear something today," Rupert said.

Swiss Economy Minister Guy Parmelin returned home on Friday after talks with Greer in Washington, saying: "We clarified virtually everything."

Parmelin declined to provide details of the discussions but said there would be further communication when everything is "finally clear."

The government gave no new details on Friday.

A Swiss source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said after the Thursday meeting that a deal had effectively been reached.

A senior U.S. official said the meeting was "very positive."

Richemont's Rupert met Trump last week to discuss the impact of tariffs, along with executives from MSC, Rolex, Partners Group, Mercuria, and MKS.

The meeting helped thaw relations with Washington, Swiss media reported, and Trump said earlier this week he was working on a deal to lower the tariffs on goods from Switzerland.

Rupert said it could be months before a deal is signed.

"It's dependent on President Trump, who's a very busy man. Our situation in Switzerland is one of the things he has to deal with," he said.

Swiss industry on Friday reported a 14% fall in exports to the U.S. during the three months to the end of September, technology industry association Swissmem said, while machine tool makers saw shipments slump 43%.

A potential reduction in tariffs to 15% would stabilise the Swiss economy, Rupert said, and prevent job losses caused by the higher duty.

"It's not only us," he added. "It's potentially devastating for the whole of Switzerland."

Source: Asia_Nikkei

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Winkelmann

Stocks

Economic

Key points:

· Case involves fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019 that killed 346 people

· Boeing had agreed to plead guilty during Biden administration

· Judge said he had no authority to reject deal struck under Trump administration

Families of some victims of two Boeing737 MAX plane crashes that killed 346 people asked a U.S. appeals court on Thursday to reverse a judge's decision to approve the Justice Department's request to dismiss a criminal case against the planemaker.

Judge Reed O'Connor, of U.S. District Court in Fort Worth, Texas, last week approved the request by the Trump administration's Justice Department, but harshly criticized the government's decision.

He said he did not agree that dismissing the case, which had been pursued under the Biden administration and initially resulted in an admission of guilt, was in the public interest.

The families asked the 5th Circuit Court to reverse his decision. They said the Justice Department violated their rights as crime victims when it negotiated a deferred prosecution deal with Boeing over a fraud charge stemming from false representations the planemaker made to the Federal Aviation Administration.

"We believe that the courts don't have to stand silently by while an injustice is perpetrated," said Paul Cassell, a lawyer for some of the families. "The charges against Boeing cannot simply be dropped."

Boeing did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. The Justice Department last week rejected the judge's criticism and said it believed the deal was "the most just outcome."

O'Connor said in 2023 that "Boeing's crime may properly be considered the deadliest corporate crime in U.S. history."

He said he had no authority to reject the government's decision to make a deal with Boeing, even though it "fails to secure the necessary accountability to ensure the safety of the flying public."

Boeing last year had agreed to plead guilty to a criminal fraud conspiracy charge after the fatal 737 MAX crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia in 2018 and 2019.

After U.S. PresidentDonald Trumptook office, the Justice Department reversed course in May and dropped the demand for a guilty plea.

Under the deal, Boeing agreed to pay an additional $444.5 million into a crash victims' fund to be divided evenly per victim of the two fatal 737 MAX crashes, on top of a new $243.6 million fine and more than $455 million to strengthen the company's compliance, safety, and quality programs.

In September, the FAA proposed fining Boeing $3.1 million for a series of safety violations, including actions tied to a January 2024 Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9 mid-air emergency, and for interfering with safety officials' independence.

Separately, a jury in Chicago on Wednesday ordered Boeing to pay more than $28 million to the family of Shikha Garg, a United Nations environmental worker who was killed in the crash in Ethiopia. Under a deal between the parties, the family will receive $35.85 million - the full verdict amount plus 26% interest - and Boeing will not appeal.