• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
ASK
BID
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6939.02
6939.02
6939.02
6964.08
6893.47
-29.99
-0.43%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
48892.46
48892.46
48892.46
49047.68
48459.88
-179.09
-0.36%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23461.81
23461.81
23461.81
23662.25
23351.55
-223.30
-0.94%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
96.990
97.070
96.990
96.990
96.150
+1.020
+ 1.06%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.18491
1.18514
1.18491
1.19743
1.18491
-0.01211
-1.01%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.36835
1.36880
1.36835
1.38142
1.36788
-0.01258
-0.91%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4894.49
4894.49
4894.49
5450.83
4682.14
-481.82
-8.96%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
65.427
65.456
65.427
65.832
63.409
+0.175
+ 0.27%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

U.S. House Speaker Boris Johnson: Trump May “readjust” His Immigration Policy

Share

[Speaker Of The U.S. House Of Representatives: Confident Of Sufficient Votes To End Partial Government Shutdown By Tuesday] February 1st, According To Nbc News, U.S. House Speaker Johnson Said He Is Confident That There Will Be Enough Votes By At Least Tuesday To End The Partial Government Shutdown

Share

Iranian Official Tells Reuters: Media Reports Of Plans For Revolutionary Guards To Hold Military Exercise In Strait Of Hormuz Are Wrong

Share

Ukraine's Defence Minister Says Kyiv And Spacex Working On System To Ensure Only Authorized Starlink Terminals Work In Ukraine

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Europe Has Failed To Defeat Russia In Ukraine

Share

Nigerian Army Says It Killed A Boko Haram Commander And 10 Fighters

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: We Never Found The Two Nuclear Submarines Trump Spoke Of Deploying Closer To Russia

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Victory Will Come 'Soon' In Ukraine But Equally Important To Think Of How To Prevent New Conflicts

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Trump Is An Effective Leader Who Seeks Peace

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Behind The So Called 'Chaos' Of Trump, He Is An Effective And Original USA Leader

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Victory Will Come Soon In Ukraine War

Share

Ukraine President Zelenskiy: Next Round Of Trilateral Talks Set For Feb 4-5 In Abu Dhabi

Share

Russian Defence Ministry: Russia Gains Control Over Two Villages In Ukraine's Kharkiv And Donetsk Regions

Share

Trump Says India Will Buy Oil From Venezuela

Share

Istanbul Jan Consumer Price Index 4.56% Month-On-Month - Chamber Of Commerce

Share

Moody's: Interest Payments To Revenue Ratio Set To Worsen Next Year

Share

Moody's: Federal Government Fiscal Deficit Still Wider Than What It Was Prior To Covid

Share

Saudi Arabia's Stock Index Down 2.1% - Lseg

Share

Pakistan Balochistan Chief Minister Says 145 Militants Killed After Attacks Over 40 Hours

Share

Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei: If Americans Start A War This Time, It Will Be A Regional Conflict

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
U.K. M4 Money Supply (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Italy Unemployment Rate (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Unemployment Rate (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Prelim QoQ (SA) (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Prelim YoY (SA) (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Italy PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Mexico GDP Prelim YoY (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Brazil Unemployment Rate (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Africa Trade Balance (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Deposit Gowth YoY

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany CPI Prelim YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany CPI Prelim MoM (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany HICP Prelim YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany HICP Prelim MoM (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Core PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Core PPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada GDP MoM (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada GDP YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI MoM Final (Excl. Food, Energy and Trade) (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI YoY (Excl. Food, Energy & Trade) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Chicago PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Canada Federal Government Budget Balance (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland NBS Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland NBS Non-manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Composite PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Korea Trade Balance Prelim (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Japan Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Caixin Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Trade Balance (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Inflation Rate YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Core Inflation YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

India HSBC Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Commodity Price YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Russia IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Turkey Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Nationwide House Price Index MoM (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Nationwide House Price Index YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Germany Actual Retail Sales MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --
Italy Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Africa Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Brazil IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada National Economic Confidence Index

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Output Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Inventories Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing Employment Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing New Orders Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea CPI YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Monetary Base YoY (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Building Permits MoM (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    3487443 flag
    Today you but later you will
    3487443 flag
    3487443 flag
    The gold star rose slightly this week, then declined for an extended period.
    srinivas flag
    3487443
    Today you but later you will
    @Visitor3487443you do know that gold needs to be mined right?
    3487443 flag
    Did you know that from 1980 to 2000 there were many geopolitical crises, especially wars, even more frequent than now? Do you know about gold speculation and gold accumulation? The current sharp increase in gold prices is very similar to the period from 1978 to 1980. Gold hit its lowest point in 2015 and increased slightly each year until 2019, then surged before falling to 1600. By 2023, gold had increased sharply, and by 2026, it had far exceeded inflation. Gold is no longer a safe asset; it is currently a risky asset.
    3487443 flag
    The true value of gold ranges from $1600 to $2000.
    3487443 flag
    In 1979, gold was above $200 USD, then by June it had quadrupled in value in just a few months. From above $200 USD, gold surged to over $850 USD. At that time, its value was relatively high, especially considering inflation was over 13 percent. Just a few months later, gold plummeted back to above $300 USD.
    3505272 flag
    Has anyone updated the system? That's why your reasoning is correct.
    3505186 flag
    The app is lagging so badly, I can't watch anything.
    3505186 flag
    [100]It's me, Hieu@Chế độ khách3487443
    3507622 flag
    how to trade please guide me
    hong hong flag
    That USA showed a Roun right now
    hong hong flag
    United States they can show Iran right now
    3487443 flag
    3505186
    [100]It's me, Hieu@Chế độ khách3487443
    [100]It's me, kid@Chế độ khách3505186
    hsjskbdb flag
    Similarities: Both are driven by inflation concerns, geopolitical factors, and expectations of currency devaluation. However, they differ in that central banks are now making large-scale, continuous purchases (in China, India, Turkey, etc.), which is not purely speculative . ETFs and institutional allocations are more structural, and there is no extreme single speculative event like the Hunt brothers' manipulation in 1980. Therefore, the price movements are "very similar," but the support is more solid, and while bubble risks exist, they are not entirely the same. Regarding the current surge in gold prices and future prospects, you mentioned that "the increase will far exceed the inflation rate by 2026," which has already partially materialized in 2025-2026. Gold has risen from approximately $2000+ in 2023 to the current $5000+, far exceeding the cumulative CPI over the same period. Most institutions predict that gold will remain in the $5000-$6200 range in 2026 (UBS $6200 target, JPM $5055 average, etc.), with some optimists seeing a possible $7000+. Has gold already transformed from a "safe-haven asset" into a "risk asset"? This is a very sharp observation, and there is indeed disagreement in the market: The traditional view is that gold remains the ultimate safe haven, with low correlation to the stock market, and performs exceptionally well during periods of geopolitical risk, inflation, and a weak dollar. Multiple reports (JPM, VanEck, BIS, etc.) for 2025–2026 still emphasize its role as "insurance," hedging against currency devaluation and geopolitical risks. However, reality has changed: gold volatility has increased significantly in recent years (monthly gains sometimes exceeding 10% in 2025), and its correlation with certain risk assets (such as Bitcoin) has occasionally increased. In times of extreme liquidity tightening or a sharp rebound in risk appetite, gold may also experience short-term sell-offs (like in the early stages of interest rate hikes in 2022). Therefore, to some extent, gold has become partially "risk-averse"—it is no longer a zero-volatility capital-preserving tool, but rather a strategic asset with strong trends and cyclicality. Especially at high levels, speculative elements increase, and the risk of a correction is considerable. However, the mainstream consensus remains that gold still leans towards safety during systemic crises, rather than being a purely risky asset like stocks. Central bank buying and the global trend of de-dollarization have strengthened its "strategic reserve" status. Overall, your historical analogy is quite accurate; gold is indeed currently in a "frenzied + structural" phase similar to the late 1970s, but with more support from real demand. Short-term bullish sentiment remains strong, but whether a repeat of the 1980-1982-style major correction will occur after consolidation at high levels is one of the biggest uncertainties of 2026. What is your view on the probability of a correction? Or which specific driving factor are you more focused on?
    hsjskbdb flag
    Envious of Trump, who can freely control gold prices.
    hsjskbdb flag
    He even acted with Musk last time.
    3507933 flag
    hsjskbdb
    He even acted with Musk last time.
    @hsjskbdbin
    Joyce flag
    have any of you review the lumonel.com that I have been posting my earnings on here
    "ThatfxSniper📈" recalled a message
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          US House Cancels Vote On Crypto Bills Due To Procedural Issue

          Diana Wallace
          Summary:

          The cancellation of the House vote holds significance for the cryptocurrency sector, creating an impact seen in price volatility and market uncertainty.

          Key Points:

          ● Main event, leadership changes, market impact, financial shifts, or expert insights.
          ● Votes on digital assets canceled, delaying regulatory clarity.
          ● Procedural issues stall progress on crypto regulations.

          Canceled Vote on Cryptocurrency Bills

          The cancellation of the House vote holds significance for the cryptocurrency sector, creating an impact seen in price volatility and market uncertainty.

          Canceled Legislative Vote

          The planned vote on major crypto legislation was scrapped after a procedural failure. This decision obstructs the progress of the GENIUS Act and Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, initially poised to set the first major US regulatory framework for crypto markets.

          Key political figures led to this decision, emphasizing concerns over central bank digital currencies. The potential integration of the three bills into a single vote caused dissent, necessitating a Senate revisit and stalling legislation's momentum.

          "The abrupt cancellation of votes has created immediate waves of uncertainty in the crypto market, typically resulting in increased volatility."

          Market Impact

          Immediate market responses highlight uncertainty and a spike in market reaction, with volatility and shifts in digital asset prices as traders react to legislative ambiguities. Further implications for financial markets and regulatory landscapes remain under scrutiny.

          Historical Context

          This procedural standstill mirrors prior legislative hindrances affecting digital currencies. Historical instances show temporary asset price downturns and regulatory delays often accompany such events, fostering frustration within the crypto community.

          Continued delays in passing necessary regulations prolong market instability. Analysts predict further volatility in crypto markets until progress resumes. Regulatory outcomes seem stalled until new legislative efforts emerge, leaving financial strategies and market actions in limbo.

          "We must carefully evaluate the implications of any crypto legislation, especially concerning CBDCs and the potential loss of privacy for our constituents."

          Source: CryptoSlate

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Mexico-US Trade Agreement Faces Growing Uncertainties Amid Trump's Tariff Threats

          Grace Montgomery

          China–U.S. Trade War

          Claudia Sheinbaum, the President of Mexico, cautioned that the country intends to take strong action against the US if Trump’s new tariff on Mexican imports is not suspended.

          She emphasized that a suitable trade agreement must be reached by the August 1 deadline. The announcement came after it pledged to impose a 30% tariff threat on the country’s imports to the US, that is, if it failed to succeed in its mission to put an end to drug cartels.

          In a statement, Sheinbaum clarified their motive, stating that they only need a fair agreement with the US. According to her, if it fails to provide one by August 1, they will be forced to take steps that they will inform them about.

          Mexico-US trade agreement faces growing uncertainties amid Trump’s tariff threats

          Washington had earlier announced plans to impose a 17% duty on fresh tomatoes imported to the US from Mexico. This did not please Mexico’s president. Respondingly, Sheinbaum hoped to make known the measures the country would take, including for tomato farmers, to counter the tariff threat.

          Sheibaum stated that they believed they could reach an agreement with the US. However, based on her argument, it was essential to have a backup plan since they needed to get ready for all possibilities.

          Notably, Mexico is pivotal in importing fresh tomatoes to the US. According to data from sources, the country imports approximately two-thirds of the fresh tomatoes consumed in the US.

          In the meantime, the US Commerce Department announced a cancellation of a 2019 trade agreement with Mexico that ended an investigation on Mexico’s countervailing duty. This amounted to a valuation of $3 billion of Mexican exports to the US annually.

          Mexico’s tomato export agreement was first made in 1996, whereby the two governments vowed to control it and resolve US allegations against Mexico concerning “unfair trade” practices. The agreement was updated six years ago to stop an investigation into dumping and settle tariff issues.

          On the other hand, Trump is still focused on striking as many trade deals as possible, and he pledges to impose his threatening tariffs on nearly all of his trading partners.

          Mexico vows that no other country can substitute Mexican tomatoes in the US market

          Following the US’s assertion to withdraw from the tomato agreement with Mexico, Mexico demonstrated strong confidence in renewing the agreement.

          The economy and agriculture ministries considered the 17.09% duty on Mexican tomatoes imported to the United States unfairly “underpriced.” Based on their argument, it did not favour Mexican producers and the US industry’s interests.

          To curb this, the Mexican government intends to support its tomato farmers and expand its market overseas as it negotiates a deal to strip out the tomato duty.

          A coalition of five Mexican agriculture associations, including representatives from Baja California and Sinaloa states, said they would work with the Mexican government to develop more solutions to the problem.

          They acknowledged that no other country can substitute Mexican tomatoes in the market, which they have developed through hard work and creativity over the last 120 years.

          US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick shared his view on the topic of discussion. According to Lutnick, unfair trade practices have hurt their farmers by lowering the prices of their crops, such as tomatoes.

          KEY Difference Wire helps crypto brands break through and dominate headlines fast

          Source: CryptoSlate

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Fed's Logan Says Her Base Case Calls For Holding Rates Steady A While Longer

          Daniel Carter

          Central Bank

          Economic

          The U.S. central bank will probably need to leave interest rates where they are for a while longer to ensure inflation stays low in the face of upward pressure from the Trump administration's tariffs, Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Lorie Logan said on Tuesday.
          "My base case is that we'll need to keep interest rates modestly restrictive for some time to complete the work of returning inflation sustainably to the 2% target," Logan said in remarks prepared for delivery to the World Affairs Council of San Antonio.
          "It's also possible that some combination of softer inflation and a weakening labor market will call for lower rates fairly soon," she said, noting that tariffs may not push up inflation as much or as persistently as expected, and that slight signs of cooling in recent labor market data along with pessimism among businesses and households could portend a worsening outlook for economic activity.
          The Fed has kept its policy rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range since last December. Most policymakers have signaled they want to wait at least a couple more months before resuming rate cuts because they are worried that higher prices from tariffs could undo what has been several months of relatively benign inflation data.
          The rise in consumer prices in June suggests that inflation by the Fed's targeted measure -- the 12-month increase in the price index for personal consumption expenditures, which in May was 2.3% -- will "probably move up a bit," Logan said.
          "I'd like to see low inflation continue longer to be convinced," she said.
          At the same time, the labor market is solid, the stock market is at near all-time highs, and fiscal policy appears set to be a "tailwind" for growth, she said. Earlier this month Congress passed President Donald Trump's domestic policy bill that makes his 2017 tax cuts permanent, among other measures.
          "All this adds up, for me, to a base case in which monetary policy needs to hold tight for a while longer to bring inflation sustainably back to target — and in this base case, we can sustain maximum employment even with modestly restrictive policy," Logan said.
          Cutting rates too soon, she said, would risk deeper economic scars and a longer road to price stability. Cutting rates too late risks allowing the labor market to weaken more, though the Fed would "have the option of cutting rates further to get employment back on track," Logan said.
          For now, Logan said, monetary policy is "well positioned," a phrase that Fed Chair Jerome Powell has repeatedly used to describe the Fed's readiness to act when the data signal it is time.

          Source: Yahoo Finance

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump Says Bessent Isn't Leading Fed Candidate, But 'Very Good’

          Daniel Carter

          Political

          “He's an option and he's very good,” Trump told reporters on Tuesday when asked directly about Bessent being a potential successor.
          Asked by a reporter whether Bessent was the top option, Trump responded, “Well, he's not, because I like the job he's doing.”
          Trump also again lambasted Powell over renovations at the central bank that the president and his allies have seized on, arguing that the work has been plagued by cost overruns. Trump suggested that the renovation costs were “pretty disgraceful” and could be a fireable offense, but stopped short of saying he planned to push out the Fed chief over the flap.
          “I think he's a total stiff, but the one thing I didn't see him as is the guy that needed a palace to live in,” Trump said.
          Powell has called media reports about the renovations inaccurate but earlier this week made a formal request for the bank's inspector general to review the renovation.
          The president has kept up pressure on Powell to lower interest rates, which the central bank has held steady this year.
          Trump's comments came hours after Bessent in an interview on Bloomberg Television suggested that Powell should step down from the bank's board when his term as chair ends in May 2026, saying that markets would react poorly to the idea of a shadow Fed chief.
          “There's been a lot of talk of a shadow Fed chair causing confusion in advance of his or her nomination. And I can tell you, I think it'd be very confusing for the market for a former Fed chair to stay on also,” Bessent said.
          Powell's term as a Fed governor doesn't end until January 2028, leaving it possible for him to remain at the central bank — and to participate in monetary policymaking — even after his tenure as the chair comes up next May.
          Bessent also said that a “formal process” to find a successor to Powell had started.
          Asked whether Trump has asked Bessent himself to serve as Fed chair, the Treasury chief noted that he was “part of the decision-making process” and said it was “President Trump's decision, and it will move at his speed.”

          Source: Bloomberg Europe

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Beneath China's Resilient Economy, aLlife of Pay Cuts and Side Hustles

          Manuel

          Economic

          China–U.S. Trade War

          Chinese state firm employee Zhang Jinming makes up for a 24% cut to his salary by delivering food for three hours every night after work and on weekends - and hopes he can avoid awkward encounters with colleagues.
          "Being a part-time delivery person while working for a state-owned enterprise isn't exactly considered respectable," said Zhang, whose real estate firm pays him 4,200 yuan ($585) per month, down from 5,500 yuan.
          While China has supported economic growth by keeping its ports and factories humming, the lack of real demand has hit profits, in turn squeezing workers like Zhang through wage cuts and forcing them to moonlight.
          "There's just no other way," added the 30-year-old, who rides his scooter until 11.30 pm, making 60-70 yuan per evening. "The pay cut has put me under huge pressure. Many colleagues have resigned and I took over their workload."
          China's economy posted robust 5.2% growth in the second quarter, showing its export-heavy model has so far withstood U.S. tariffs. But beneath the headline resilience, cracks are widening.
          Contract and bill payment delays are rising, including among export champions like the autos and electronics industries and at utilities, whose owners, indebted local governments, have to run a tight shop while shoring up tariff-hit factories.
          Ferocious competition for a slice of external demand, hit by global trade tensions, is crimping industrial profits, fuelling factory-gate deflation even as export volumes climb. Workers bear the brunt of companies cutting costs.
          Falling profits and wages shrank tax revenues, pressuring state employers like Zhang's to cut costs as well. In pockets of the financial system, non-performing loans are surging as authorities push banks to lend more.
          For the most part, the lopsided nature of growth in the world's second-largest economy is a product of policies that favour exporters over consumers.
          Economists have long urged Beijing to redirect support to domestically focused sectors, such as education and healthcare, or boost household consumption - for instance, by bolstering welfare - or risk a slowdown in the second half of the year.
          Max Zenglein, Asia-Pacific senior economist at the Conference Board of Asia, describes China as a "dual-speed economy" with strong industry and weak consumption, noting the two are related.
          "Some of the economic challenges including low profitability and deflationary pressure are largely driven by continued capacity expansion in the manufacturing and technology sectors," said Zenglein.
          "What's unfolding now" in the trade war with the U.S. is "coming back home as a domestic issue."

          HIT TO INCOMES

          Frank Huang, a 28-year-old teacher in Chongzuo, a city of more than 2 million people near the Vietnam border, in the indebted Guangxi region, says his school has not paid him in two-to-three months, waiting for authorities to provide the funds.
          "I can only endure, I don't dare to quit," said Huang, who relies on parents when his 5,000 yuan paycheck doesn't arrive. "If I were married with a mortgage, car loan and child, the pressure would be unimaginable."
          Another teacher from Linquan, a rural county of 1.5 million in eastern China, said she is only receiving her basic 3,000 yuan monthly salary. The performance-based part of her pay, usually about 16%, "has been consistently delayed."
          "After I pay for gas, parking and property management fees, what's left isn't enough for groceries," said the teacher, who only gave her surname Yun for privacy reasons.
          "I feel like begging," added Yun. "If it weren't for my parents, I would starve."
          There is no data on payment delays in the government sector. But among industrial firms, arrears have grown quickly in sectors with a strong state presence, either through industrial policy or - like in utilities - through direct ownership.
          Arrears in the computer, communication and electronic equipment sector and in autos manufacturing - two priorities for China's economic planners - rose by 16.6% and 11.2%, respectively, in the year through May, faster than the 9% average across industries. Overdue payments were up 17.1% and 11.1% in the water and gas sectors.
          These figures suggest liquidity stress and are a side-effect of authorities prioritising output over demand, said Minxiong Liao, senior economist at GlobalData.TS Lombard APAC.
          "The result should be slower growth for these champion sectors," in the future, he said.

          SPENDING DEFERRED

          With incomes under pressure, Beijing is struggling to meet its pledge to lift household consumption and worries are growing that persistent deflation will further damage the economy as consumers defer spending.
          Huang Tingting quit her waitress job last month after business at her restaurant - and most shops nearby - plummeted in April, at the height of U.S.-China trade tensions. Responding to plunging revenues, the restaurant owner asked staff to take four unpaid leave days every month.
          "I still have to pay rent and live my life," said the 20-year-old from the eastern Jiangsu province, an export powerhouse that's outpacing national growth, explaining why she quit.
          In the past, though, she could find another restaurant job in a day or two. This time, she's been unemployed since June. One recruiter told her a job she applied for had more than 10 other candidates.
          "The job market this year is worse than last year," said Huang.

          Source: Reuters

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Cantor Fitzgerald SPAC Nears $4B Deal With Blockstream´s Adam Back to Amass 30,000 Bitcoin

          Manuel

          Cryptocurrency

          Stocks

          Cantor Fitzgerald’s blank‑cheque affiliate is in late‑stage talks to acquire more than $3 billion in Bitcoin (BTC) from Adam Back’s Blockstream Capital through a transaction that could exceed $4 billion, the Financial Times reported on July 15.
          Cantor Equity Partners 1, a special‑purpose acquisition company that raised $200 million in a January IPO, would issue new shares to Back in exchange for as much as 30,000 BTC. The amount represents approximately $3 billion at current prices.
          Furthermore, the firm intends to seek up to $800 million in additional outside capital for further Bitcoin purchases. Upon completion of the transaction, the vehicle will be renamed BSTR Holdings.

          Deal details

          If completed, the deal would mirror a $3.6 billion Bitcoin buying venture, Twenty One Capital, that Cantor Fitzgerald’s Brandon Lutnick set up with SoftBank and Tether in April.
          Combined, the two SPACs could accumulate nearly $10 billion in Bitcoin this year, positioning Cantor as one of the most active institutional buyers of the asset.
          Back is best known for inventing Hashcash and co-founding Blockstream in 2014. As part of the deal, Back will swap the contributed Bitcoin for equity in the public firm.
          Blockstream Capital’s stake would rise alongside any subsequent purchases the SPAC finances with newly raised capital. Brandon Lutnick was named chair of Cantor Fitzgerald in February after his father, Howard Lutnick, became US Commerce Secretary.
          Cantor’s move follows a playbook popularized by Strategy, whose Bitcoin treasury approach has prompted a wave of corporations and SPACs to raise equity or issue convertible bonds to buy BTC outright.

          Timing and regulatory backdrop

          Negotiators aim to finalize terms as early as this week, placing the announcement in the midst of what Republican lawmakers have branded “Crypto Week,” during which the House is debating multiple digital asset bills.
          Cantor’s push also aligns with President Donald Trump’s deregulatory stance toward crypto markets, a shift that executives describe as conducive to large balance sheet allocations.
          The transaction would require shareholder approval and review by the Securities and Exchange Commission of updated disclosures detailing the Bitcoin contribution and capital raise.
          Should the SPAC complete its acquisition and subsequent fundraising, BSTR Holdings would emerge as one of the world’s largest listed holders of Bitcoin, trailing only Strategy and a handful of spot ETF trusts.

          Source: Cryptoslate

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          JPMorgan's Dimon Warns Against Playing Around With the Fed' as Powell Pressure Mounts

          Manuel

          Central Bank

          Political

          JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon said Tuesday that the independence of the Federal Reserve is "absolutely critical" for Jerome Powell and whoever succeeds him as chairman of the central bank.
          "Playing around with the Fed can often have adverse consequences," Dimon told reporters after JPMorgan reported its first quarter earnings, adding that it can produce "the absolute opposite of what may be hoping for."
          Wall Street is paying close attention to the drama unfolding in Washington, D.C., as President Trump and other White House officials intensify their pressure on Powell to lower interest rates and conduct a search for his replacement. Powell's term as chair ends in May.
          rump has hammered Powell for months over what Trump views as a refusal to ease monetary policy for political and personal reasons. At one point, he mused publicly about removing Powell, before assuring that he wouldn't do so.
          Trump's allies in recent weeks have also used another tactic to turn up the pressure on Powell: They have invoked a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's headquarters as a way to question the chair's management of the institution and whether he told Congress the truth about the project.
          Different administration officials are sending mixed messages about how far they may be willing to go with Powell.
          National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Sunday on ABC News's "This Week" that whether the president has the legal authority to fire Powell before his term is up next May "is being looked into" and that "certainly, if there's cause, he does."
          But Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg Tuesday that the president "said numerous times he's not going to fire Jay Powell" and compared Trump's public pressure to former college basketball coach Bobby Knight "working the refs."
          "President Trump seems to prefer the Bobby Knight school," he said.
          Bessent also said Tuesday that central bank independence is important and noted that "there's a formal process that's already starting" to find Powell's replacement. He also hopes Powell decides to leave the Fed board when his term as chair is up.
          "Traditionally, the Fed chair also steps down as a governor," Bessent said, "and there's been a lot of talk of a shadow Fed chair causing confusion in advance of his or her nomination, and I can tell you I think it would be very confusing for the market for a former Fed chair to stay on also."
          Bessent is considered among the possible successors to Powell, along with Hassett, former Fed governor Kevin Warsh, and Fed governor Christopher Waller.
          "There are a lot of great candidates, and we'll see how rapidly it progresses," Bessent said, without confirming if he was in fact under consideration. "It's President Trump's decision, and it will move at his speed."
          As far as who the next pick will be, Dimon said, "Let's just see who the president picks, and you'll be the judge of that when you see the choice ... But I would say it is important they be independent."
          Dimon went out of his way to note that the president has said he "is not going to remove Jay Powell."
          Another big bank executive, Wells Fargo (WFC) CFO Mike Santomassimo, was also asked Tuesday about the market risk of recent Fed pressure.
          He rebuffed concerns. "I think you haven't really seen that'd be a major factor at this point relative to what we're seeing from a risk perspective," Santomassimo told reporters.

          Source: Yahoo Finance

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2026 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Personal Information Protection Statement
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          Connect Broker
          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com