• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Trending
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
BID
ASK
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6827.42
6827.42
6827.42
6899.86
6801.80
-73.58
-1.07%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
48458.04
48458.04
48458.04
48886.86
48334.10
-245.98
-0.51%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23195.16
23195.16
23195.16
23554.89
23094.51
-398.69
-1.69%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
98.000
98.080
98.000
98.070
97.920
+0.050
+ 0.05%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.17286
1.17294
1.17286
1.17447
1.17276
-0.00108
-0.09%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.33640
1.33649
1.33640
1.33740
1.33546
-0.00067
-0.05%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4339.18
4339.59
4339.18
4347.21
4294.68
+39.79
+ 0.93%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
57.468
57.498
57.468
57.601
57.194
+0.235
+ 0.41%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

Swiss Government Sees 2026 CPI At +0.2% (Previous Forecast Was +0.5%)

Share

Reuters Calculation - India's Nov Services Trade Surplus At $17.9 Billion

Share

India Trade Secretary: Reduction In Imports In November Due To Fall In Gold, Oil And Coal Shipments

Share

India Trade Secretary: Gold Imports Have Declined In Nov By About 60%

Share

India Trade Secretary: Exports In Sectors Such Engineering, Electronics , Gems And Jewellery Aided November Figures

Share

India's Nov Merchandise Trade Deficit At $24.53 Billion - Reuters Calculation (Poll $32 Billion)

Share

India's Nov Merchandise Imports At $62.66 Billion

Share

India's Nov Merchandise Exports At $38.13 Billion

Share

Stats Office - Swiss November Producer/Import Prices -1.6% Year-On-Year (Versus-1.7% In Prior Month)

Share

Stats Office - Swiss November Producer/Import Prices -0.5% Month-On-Month (Versus-0.3% In Prior Month)

Share

Thailand To Hold Elections On Feb 8 - Multiple Local Media Reports

Share

Taiwan Dollar Falls 0.6% To 31.384 Per USA Dollar, Lowest Since December 3

Share

Stats Office - Botswana November Consumer Inflation At 0.0% Month-On-Month

Share

Stats Office - Botswana November Consumer Inflation At 3.8% Year-On-Year

Share

Statistics Bureau - Kazakhstan's Jan-Nov Industrial Output +7.4% Year-On-Year

Share

Fca: Sets Out Plans To Help Build Mortgage Market Of Future

Share

Eurostoxx 50 Futures Up 0.38%, DAX Futures Up 0.43%, FTSE Futures Up 0.37%

Share

[Delivery Of New US Presidential Aircraft Delayed Again] According To The Latest Timeline Released By The US Air Force, The Delivery Of The First Of The Two Newly Commissioned Air Force One Presidential Aircraft Will Not Be Earlier Than 2028. This Means That The Delivery Of The New Air Force One Has Been Delayed Once Again

Share

German Nov Wholesale Prices +0.3% Month-On-Month

Share

Norway's Nov Trade Balance Nok 41.3 Billion - Statistics Norway

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
France HICP Final MoM (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Outstanding Loans Growth YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland M2 Money Supply YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland M0 Money Supply YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland M1 Money Supply YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India CPI YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Deposit Gowth YoY

A:--

F: --

P: --

Brazil Services Growth YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Mexico Industrial Output YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Russia Trade Balance (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Philadelphia Fed President Henry Paulson delivers a speech
Canada Building Permits MoM (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Wholesale Sales YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Wholesale Inventory MoM (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Wholesale Inventory YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Wholesale Sales MoM (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany Current Account (Not SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Small Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Large Non-Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Large Non-Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Large Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Small Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Large Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Large-Enterprise Capital Expenditure YoY (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Rightmove House Price Index YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Industrial Output YoY (YTD) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Urban Area Unemployment Rate (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Saudi Arabia CPI YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Industrial Output YoY (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Industrial Output MoM (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Existing Home Sales MoM (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Total Reserve Assets (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Inflation Rate Expectations

--

F: --

P: --

Canada National Economic Confidence Index

--

F: --

P: --

Canada New Housing Starts (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Employment Index (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Index (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Core CPI YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing Unfilled Orders MoM (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Prices Received Index (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing New Orders Index (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing New Orders MoM (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Core CPI MoM (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Trimmed CPI YoY (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing Inventory MoM (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI MoM (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI YoY (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Core CPI MoM (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI MoM (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Federal Reserve Board Governor Milan delivered a speech
U.S. NAHB Housing Market Index (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Composite PMI Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Services PMI Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Manufacturing PMI Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Manufacturing PMI Prelim (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Unemployment Claimant Count (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Unemployment Rate (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. 3-Month ILO Unemployment Rate (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    Connecting
    .
    .
    .
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          U.K. Economy Unexpectedly Contracted in October; GDP Dropped 0.1%

          Glendon

          Forex

          Economic

          Summary:

          The U.K. economy unexpectedly remained in contraction in October, with uncertainty ahead of the Autumn budget by Chancellor Rachel Reeves likely curtailing growth.

          The U.K. economy unexpectedly remained in contraction in October, with uncertainty ahead of the Autumn budget by Chancellor Rachel Reeves likely curtailing growth.

          Data released earlier Friday by the Office for National Statistics showed that U.K. gross domestic product fell by 0.1% on a monthly basis in October, matching the drop seen during the prior month and below the 0.1% growth expected.

          On an annual basis, the U.K. economy expanded by 1.1% in October, matching the growth seen the previous month and below the 1.4% growth expected

          The manufacturing sector reported growth of 0.5% in October, rebounding from the hefty 1.7% drop the previous month, boosted by the restart of operations at Jaguar Land Rover's factories early in the month, after a cyber attack.

          For more discussion surrounding economic data releases from top Wall Street analysts, subscribe to InvestingPro - get 55% off today

          The uncertainty surrounding the Autumn budget, delivered by U.K. finance minister Rachel Reeves in November, likely deterred businesses and consumers alike from making investment decisions.

          In the end, Reeves did raise taxes to give her greater room to meet her deficit-reduction targets as well as fund higher welfare spending, but not by as much as had been feared.

          As a result, the Confederation of British Industry earlier Friday lifted up its economic growth forecast for next year, citing a temporary boost to government spending following the budget.

          The business association predicted the U.K. economy will grow 1.3% next year, up from its previous forecast of 1.0% in June, and also lifted its forecast for this year to 1.4% from 1.2%, reflecting upward revisions to recent official data.

          "While it's welcome to see our growth forecast upgraded for next year, the mood music reads more 'cautious optimism' than 'cause for celebration'," CBI chief economist Louise Hellem said.

          The Bank of England holds its final policy-setting meeting of the year next week, and is widely expected to cut interest rates by a quarter point to 3.75% as recent data has shown inflation drifting lower.

          British inflation fell in October for the first time since May, to 3.6% from 3.8%, in line with the central bank's expectations, and November data due next week could show a further drift downwards.

          The BOE held interest rates unchanged at 4.0% in November, but this was a close call with four out of the nine policymakers voting for a rate reduction.

          Source: Investing

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump's ‘Gold Card’ Fast-Track Visa Sparks Legal and Economic Concerns

          Gerik

          Economic

          A High-Priced Path to Citizenship for the Global Elite

          President Donald Trump has launched the “Trump Gold Card,” a controversial new immigration initiative offering wealthy individuals and corporations expedited U.S. permanent residency and eventually citizenship through large, nonrefundable contributions. For individuals, a $1 million donation and a $15,000 processing fee grant access to EB-1 or EB-2 visa tracks. Corporations may sponsor employees for $2 million under the “Corporate Gold Card,” with additional fees and optional transfer rights.
          Applications for both programs opened December 10, following a September executive order. Trump claims the program will raise “billions” for the U.S. Treasury, helping fund government initiatives and strengthening the economy. The Trump administration has framed the move as a way to “bring in the best,” emphasizing elite talent and global capital over broader immigration access.

          Legal Ambiguities Undermine Policy Certainty

          Despite its high-profile rollout, legal experts argue that the program’s foundation remains shaky. Unlike the EB-5 investor visa program, which is grounded in federal statute and requires job creation, the Gold Card relies entirely on an executive order without congressional approval. This raises key concerns about its legality and long-term enforceability.
          Immigration attorney Natalia Polukhtin notes that the program circumvents legislative processes by carving out space within existing visa categories EB-1A for individuals with “extraordinary ability” and EB-2-NIW for those who benefit the national interest without formally amending immigration law. The lack of statutory basis could expose the program to future legal challenges or rollback under a different administration.
          Additionally, unlike EB-5, which mandates targeted investments and job creation, the Gold Card requires no specific business placement or employment contribution. The $1 million “donation” is not a capital investment; rather, it is an unstructured payment to the federal government, raising further doubts about whether it aligns with established immigration frameworks.

          Dubious Economic Returns Raise Cost-Efficiency Questions

          Trump has promoted the Gold Card program as a tool to “build the greatest economy on earth,” but economists remain unconvinced that this visa model will deliver measurable benefits to the U.S. economy. While capital inflows may increase federal revenue, research suggests such schemes typically have only marginal effects especially in large economies like the United States.
          Nuri Katz, founder of Apex Capital Partners, points out that the EB-5 program already draws around 4,000 applications annually at a lower cost threshold of $800,000. Even if that number were to migrate to the Gold Card’s $1 million price tag, the Treasury’s gain would hover around $4 billion per year barely registering in the context of the federal budget or national debt.
          An IMF study on global citizenship-by-investment programs further suggests that while they may temporarily boost revenue in small countries, they are often associated with real estate price inflation and fail to generate long-term economic gains. In such countries, property markets inflated by investor inflows saw prices rise by up to 3% within a year raising concerns about speculative pressures on urban housing if the Gold Card were widely adopted.
          Moreover, the lack of any job creation or economic multiplier requirement limits the program’s capacity to generate productivity or industrial benefits. From an economic standpoint, the Trump Gold Card functions more like a fundraising tool than an investment visa.

          Corporate Gold Cards and Transferable Access Raise Ethical Flags

          The program’s corporate version adds another layer of complexity. For $2 million, a company can sponsor an employee’s permanent residency with the option to transfer the benefit to another employee for a 5% fee. This raises ethical concerns about the commodification of immigration status and the potential for large firms to use visas as strategic leverage within global talent markets.
          Additionally, the 1% annual maintenance fee for approved corporate cardholders introduces an ongoing cost that might be bearable for multinationals but could skew competition by pricing out smaller firms or startups. The ability to transfer immigration sponsorship for a fee, critics argue, turns visa access into a marketable asset rather than a merit-based selection.

          High-Profile Rollout, Unclear Impact

          The Trump Gold Card offers a flashy new avenue for elite immigration but faces serious scrutiny on legal, ethical, and economic grounds. The lack of congressional authorization, absence of job-creation obligations, and reliance on nonrefundable donations rather than investments all distinguish it from established immigration models like the EB-5.
          While the program may succeed in raising capital from a narrow group of global elites, its broader utility for the U.S. economy remains questionable. It risks undermining the coherence of immigration policy by privileging wealth without guaranteeing public benefit, potentially triggering legal resistance and further polarization of immigration reform debates.
          In short, the Trump Gold Card symbolizes a policy pivot toward transactional citizenship but without robust legal grounding or economic returns, its legacy may be more political than practical.

          Source: Reuters

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Cliff Notes: Price Pressures To Remain The Focus

          Westpac

          Political

          Central Bank

          Economic

          The RBA's decision to leave the cash rate unchanged came as no surprise to the market, but the focus was always going to be on the RBA's take on the recent dataflow.

          In the event, the Monetary Policy Board conceded that part of the recent lift in underlying inflation "may be persistent", but also that some was due to "temporary factors". On activity, "private demand has strengthened, driven by both consumption and investment", and, if it were to persist, would "likely add to capacity pressures". Though the "risks to inflation have tilted to the upside" in the RBA's view, they do not appear to be in any rush to pre-emptively react to these risks, noting that "it will take a little longer to assess the persistence of inflationary pressures."

          Underlying the RBA's assessment on the balance of risks is a somewhat more pessimistic view on supply capacity which, in the context of an economic upswing, begets a more hawkish tone around the inflation outlook. Our view on productivity, population and participation is more constructive, implying that the economy can handle a higher rate of growth without sparking excessive inflation. As temporary factors wash out, inflation should resume its trajectory toward the mid-point of the target range, providing scope to deliver two more rate cuts next year. If inflation dynamics take longer to normalise, the risk is that the cash rate could remain on hold for longer than our current base case.

          Developments around the labour market will also be key for policy hence. The data continues to speak to a gradual softening as jobs growth across broad industry segments normalises. The November update revealed a decline in employment (–21.3k) which was 'cushioned' by an unexpected fall in the participation rate, resulting in the unemployment rate holding steady at 4.3%. We expect a bit more slack to open up over the next year, putting a lid on any upside risks to inflation stemming from the labour market.

          Before moving offshore, a final note on business. The latest NAB business survey indicated that business conditions remained positive and generally steady around long-run average levels in November, notwithstanding a small decline. Business confidence was a little shakier in the month, but a more constructive picture around forward orders has allowed businesses to remain cautiously optimistic. As evidence of a sustained recovery continues to build, businesses will be able to expand capacity with a greater degree of confidence.

          In the US, the FOMC cut the fed funds rate by 25bps to 3.625% at their December meeting but maintained its projection of only one further cut in 2026 and another in 2027, reaching a broadly neutral rate of 3.125% by end-2027. This cautious approach reflects expectations of above-trend growth through 2028, supported by real income gains and AI-driven infrastructure investment, seeing the unemployment rate ease back to 4.2%.

          Inflation is only forecast to decline gradually from 3.0% in 2025 to 2.0% by 2028, implying moderately restrictive policy will achieve the dual mandate, eventually. We anticipate capacity constraints and persistent inflation risks will limit further easing by the FOMC to just one more cut, which is most likely to be seen in Q1 2026 before inflation proves more persistent than the Committee currently expects. The fed funds rate on hold at 3.375% with persistent inflation risks is likely to bias up long-term yields, particularly amid elevated fiscal uncertainty.

          The Bank of Canada subsequently kept rates steady at 2.25%, maintaining an accommodative stance to support the economy as it navigates excess capacity and trade uncertainty. The Governing Council remain confident inflation will remain at target with the inflation rate having held close to their target of 2.0% for over a year and excess capacity and softer wage growth likely to offset any upside risk to consumer prices from trade. The labour market has strengthened in recent months but still remains weak compared to where it was prior to the pandemic.

          In China meanwhile, consumer inflation accelerated to 0.7%yr in November as producer prices deflation became more even entrenched, with prices down 2.2%yr. The rise in consumer prices reflects increases in the cost of food and gold jewellery versus demand-led inflation which there is little-to-no evidence of. Further support centred on household consumption should broaden consumer inflation through 2026.

          Producer prices are unlikely to sustainably grow until capacity tightens, however. This could be a long way off. 'Anti-involution' policies champion profitability, but this does not preclude new more productive supply being invested in to replace old ineffective capacity or to meet demand for new goods and services. Price declines and profitability can therefore co-exist sustainably.

          Source: Westpac Banking Corporation

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump-Modi Dialogue Rekindles Hope for US-India Trade Breakthrough Amid Geopolitical Tensions

          Gerik

          Economic

          Leaders Reconnect as Trade Negotiations Regain Momentum

          President Trump and Prime Minister Modi’s call this week was described as “warm and engaging,” reflecting renewed diplomatic synergy at a time when both nations are striving to reset trade relations. Modi emphasized the positive tone and reaffirmed joint commitments to regional peace and global prosperity. Trump’s ambassador to India, Sergio Gor, characterized the exchange as a conversation between “two friends,” underscoring a sense of political chemistry amid strategic calculations.
          However, beneath the cordial surface lies a complex agenda. The U.S. and India are navigating months of stalled trade negotiations, largely due to Trump’s imposition of 50% punitive tariffs on Indian imports particularly those linked to retaliatory measures against India’s continued purchase of Russian oil during the Ukraine conflict. These tariffs have placed acute pressure on Indian industries and emerged as the central obstacle to securing a broader trade accord.

          Diplomatic Activity Intensifies Ahead of Deal Deadline

          In an effort to break the deadlock, two high-profile American delegations traveled to New Delhi this week. State Department official Allison Hooker met with Indian foreign ministry leaders including Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, while Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Rick Switzer held discussions with Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal and senior Indian trade officials. These meetings, although confidential, were reportedly productive, and both sides expressed willingness to continue working toward a mutual understanding.
          An Indian official familiar with the talks noted that a phased agreement particularly focusing on reducing import tariffs could materialize before the end of the financial year in March 2026. India’s Chief Economic Adviser, V. Anantha Nageswaran, also voiced optimism in a Bloomberg Television interview, stating he would be “surprised” if the deal remained unsigned by March. He acknowledged previous delays but highlighted that most issues had been ironed out and only timing remained uncertain.

          Strategic Interests and External Pressures Complicate Progress

          The conversation between Trump and Modi took place shortly after Modi welcomed Russian President Vladimir Putin to India, signaling New Delhi’s intention to maintain strategic autonomy despite Washington’s pressure. The timing of this visit just before the U.S. delegations arrived suggests India is leveraging its geopolitical balance to extract more favorable terms from both superpowers.
          While India aims to preserve its growing trade relationship with the U.S., including cooperation on critical technologies and defense, it remains unwilling to compromise on energy security, particularly in relation to Russian oil imports. This strategic posture complicates Trump’s approach, as he attempts to balance national security concerns with domestic economic goals.
          The foreign ownership of Indian exports especially rice has also emerged as a flashpoint. Trump recently hinted at additional tariffs on Indian rice imports, citing alleged dumping practices. India, as the world’s top rice exporter and second-largest supplier to the U.S., swiftly rebutted the claim, with the Indian Rice Exporters Federation asserting that exports to the U.S. are demand-driven and do not compete with American basmati rice production. This tension reflects not only trade imbalance concerns but also deeper apprehensions about agricultural competition and market sovereignty.

          Trade Accord Within Reach, But Fragility Persists

          The renewed diplomatic exchange between Trump and Modi injects cautious optimism into the prolonged trade standoff between the U.S. and India. The engagement of senior officials and alignment on broader security and technology objectives provide a supportive backdrop. However, multiple factors ranging from strategic oil partnerships to sensitive tariff disputes remain unresolved.
          The causal relationship between Trump’s tariff regime and India’s slow response to trade normalization is evident. While both sides are motivated to finalize a deal, especially before the March 2026 fiscal deadline, political considerations, domestic pressures, and the broader geopolitical context could still derail the fragile progress.
          Should an agreement be reached, it would symbolize a significant shift in U.S.-India economic ties and reinforce their joint strategic trajectory. But as with previous rounds of negotiation, the absence of a clear enforcement roadmap and Trump’s fluctuating rhetoric mean the path forward remains volatile.

          Source: Bloomberg

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Economists Agree With ECB’s Schnabel That Next Move Will Be Hike

          Justin

          Political

          Economic

          Central Bank

          Economists predict the next shift in European Central Bank interest rates will be up, aligning with the views of investors and influential Executive Board member Isabel Schnabel as inflation settles around 2%.

          More than 60% of respondents in a Bloomberg survey say officials are more likely to raise borrowing costs than lower them — a meaningful change from October, when only a third shared that outlook.

          It's not something they expect to happen anytime soon, however: The deposit rate is seen remaining at 2% on Dec. 18 and throughout the next two years.

          Analysts are revising their forecasts after inflation stabilized and the euro zone's economy weathered global trade stress and geopolitical upheaval surprisingly well.

          In an interview, Schnabel cited such resilience — and rosier prospects, helped by a glut of government spending — among reasons why she's "rather comfortable" with wagers for rates to rise next. One gauge points to a first increase in the latter half of 2027.

          Most Governing Council members say simply that rates are in a "good place" for the time being. For President Christine Lagarde, the task will be to reflect their confidence that dangers to the economy are waning without encouraging the idea that hikes are getting close, according to Jan von Gerich, chief strategist at Nordea. That's an opinion shared by others.

          "The biggest challenge is one of communication, particularly against a backdrop of rapidly-evolving market expectations," said Paul Hollingsworth, chief European economist at BNP Paribas.

          Hollingsworth and von Gerich both forecast quarter-point hikes in September and December 2027. Were traders to bet on more rapid action, tighter financing conditions would pose a headwind for the economy — just as it's expected to pick up.

          Indeed, survey respondents reckon next week's new quarterly projections from the ECB will paint a brighter picture for growth — something Lagarde herself has also suggested.

          On inflation, concerns linger about 2027, when a holdup in the European Union's new carbon-pricing system could weigh. Most economists, though, expect a September forecast for prices to rise 1.9% that year to be maintained.

          Eyes will then shift to 2028 — the first time it will feature in the outlook. The poll indicates a figure just above the ECB's 2% goal, leaving almost two-thirds of analysts more worried about an overshoot of the medium-term target than an undershoot.

          Even those who think price pressures will be materially weaker in three years don't consider them soft enough alone to trigger another decrease in borrowing costs.

          "The ECB should feel rates are properly set at present as inflation risks are comparatively balanced," Scope economist Dennis Shen said. "We don't expect any rate reductions in 2026, but the ECB will keep its options open."

          One reason to remain flexible, according to Shen, is the potential for more US cuts next year. The Federal Reserve eased for a third straight meeting this week and may lower once more in 2026. Kevin Hassett, the frontrunner to replace Chair Jerome Powell, sees "plenty of room" for more substantial moves, however.

          US policy — monetary as well as trade — is still deemed the most acute threat to the euro area, with the war in Ukraine remaining a big concern.

          Against that backdrop, Swedbank's Chief Economist Nerijus Maciulis foresees one more cut by the ECB in March, arguing that bullishness on the region's growth prospects "rests on flimsy foundations."

          "Unless we are talking about hiking down the well-trodden scenic Alpine paths, Governing Council members are unlikely to hike any time soon," he said.

          About 45% of respondents, though, say economic growth is predominantly restrained by structural forces beyond the ECB's control. These include sluggish manufacturing amid stiffer competition from China, costly energy and excessive bureaucracy.

          Nearly half say those hurdles are just as strong as cyclical drags, illustrating why policymakers are expected to show patience before considering more rate cuts — even if growth and inflation disappoint.

          "Monetary policy can't solve structural growth problems," said ING's Carsten Brzeski, who sees officials standing pat at least through 2027. "A 25 basis-point rate cut by the ECB won't make the German automotive industry more competitive vis-a-vis China."

          Source: Bloomberg Europe

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump Escalates Scrutiny on Proxy Advisers Amid Political and Regulatory Tensions

          Gerik

          Economic

          Heightened Oversight of Proxy Advisory Industry

          On December 11, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order targeting the U.S. proxy advisory industry, specifically directing the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Department of Labor, and Department of Justice to investigate whether two dominant firms Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis violated existing regulations or antitrust laws. The focus is on how these firms have allegedly prioritized environmental and social issues that critics argue are driven by political motivations.
          The executive order reflects a broader conservative agenda to rein in the perceived power of these firms, which advise institutional investors such as pension funds and asset managers on how to vote in corporate elections. Trump’s directive does not merely suggest tighter oversight; it also opens the door for the formulation of new regulations that could reshape the way proxy voting advice is delivered in the U.S. market.

          A Political Campaign Against ESG Influence

          The action builds on a series of prior efforts by Republican lawmakers and business leaders, including figures such as JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon and Elon Musk, who claim these firms exert excessive influence over corporate decision-making processes particularly with respect to board nominations, executive pay, and ESG disclosures.
          Trump’s framing of ISS and Glass Lewis as instruments of “radical politically motivated agendas” reflects mounting pushback against ESG investing, particularly proposals urging firms to disclose carbon emissions, diversity metrics, or implement sustainability targets. By highlighting the firms’ foreign ownership ISS is largely owned by Germany's Deutsche Boerse, while Glass Lewis is backed by Canadian private equity Trump is appealing to nationalist economic sentiment, further amplifying criticism.

          Institutional Resistance and Legal Complications

          While conservative attacks on proxy advisers have intensified, attempts to curtail their role have faced legal and institutional resistance. Federal courts have already blocked previous efforts to enforce restrictions. In August, a Texas law that aimed to prevent ISS and Glass Lewis from advising on diversity and environmental matters was struck down by a federal judge. Similarly, in July, a U.S. federal appeals court upheld a ruling protecting ISS from regulations that would have forced it to publicly disclose its recommendations a requirement that could have undermined its commercial model.
          In response to the executive order, ISS reiterated its status as an SEC-registered investment adviser and emphasized its commitment to acting ethically and independently in its clients’ best interests. Glass Lewis declined to comment immediately.
          Despite recent legal victories, state-level probes are gaining traction. Florida's Attorney General has launched a lawsuit alleging consumer protection and antitrust violations, while Texas is conducting a parallel investigation. Trump’s executive order directs the FTC chairman and Attorney General Pam Bondi to assess whether these state-level investigations indicate broader federal violations, signaling that further litigation and regulatory action may follow.

          Strategic Shifts Within Proxy Firms

          In response to the changing political climate and mounting pressure, both ISS and Glass Lewis have begun dialing back their engagement with ESG proposals. ISS announced it would no longer factor boardroom diversity into its director recommendations, while Glass Lewis stated it may pursue SEC registration as an investment adviser a possible step to comply with evolving regulatory expectations.
          These actions suggest that while the firms maintain their central role in helping shareholders navigate complex corporate votes, they are also strategically repositioning themselves to minimize exposure to political and legal risks. Whether these moves will be enough to satisfy critics remains uncertain, particularly given the current administration’s intensified scrutiny.

          A Turning Point for Proxy Governance in the U.S.

          President Trump’s executive order marks a significant escalation in the politicization of corporate governance in the U.S. While framed as an effort to protect shareholders and reduce foreign influence, the action aligns with a broader campaign against ESG-driven financial practices. Although ISS and Glass Lewis have withstood legal and institutional challenges so far, the latest directive signals continued confrontation.
          The causal relationship between the firms’ ESG stances and the regulatory pushback is clear: as these advisory companies amplified support for environmental and social proposals, they invited not just market scrutiny but political retaliation. Whether the outcome will be tighter regulation or merely prolonged litigation depends on the interplay between federal agencies, courts, and future administrations. What remains certain is that the role of proxy advisers in U.S. financial markets will remain a focal point of regulatory and ideological battles well into 2026.

          Source: Reuters

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Theresa May Plays Down Reform UK Threat To Tories As ‘Noise’

          Winkelmann

          Political

          Economic

          Former Prime Minister Theresa May suggested the threat to her Conservative Party posed by the poll-leading Reform UK is over-egged, saying that while Nigel Farage's outfit "makes a lot of noise," plenty can change before the next election.

          Speaking on Bloomberg's Leaders with Francine Lacqua show, May pointed to Reform only having five of the 650 Members of Parliament, and said the party's economic policies are "all over the place."

          "The only poll that ever counts is the general election," said May, who served as prime minister from 2016 to 2019. "It's all very well doing well in opinion polls this far out from a general election, but when it comes to it, people want to ask who should be in government? Critical to that will be the economy."

          May's remarks will be seen as a call for the Conservatives to avoid the pull of Reform's populism and instead stake out the center ground of UK politics at a time when Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer is tacking to the left with higher taxes and public spending.

          "They are forgetting some of the fundamentals of growth," May said in the wider interview, pointing to the current government's move last year to hike payroll taxes for employers. "I think they don't understand business."

          The Tories may take May's views on electoral strategy with a pinch of salt, given her decision to call a snap election in 2017 backfired spectacularly. She had hoped to increase her slim majority to strengthen her hand as she negotiated a Brexit deal, but ended up losing her Parliamentary advantage altogether and being forced to rely on the support of Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionist Party in order to govern.

          Still, the former premier — who's now a member of the House of Lords — said "there's always a role for a center, center-right party" such as the Conservatives, and gave words of encouragement for the current Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch, who after a rocky start delivered a well-received speech at the party's annual conference in October.

          "She's doing well in what is the most difficult job in politics," May said, referring to the role of leader of the opposition.

          Asked about the Tory prime ministers that followed her, May appeared to take a swipe at her immediate successor, Boris Johnson, and the premier who replaced him, Liz Truss. Johnson was eventually forced out of his office by his own party following the Partygate scandal involving lockdown-breaking gatherings during the pandemic, while Truss lasted just 7 weeks in power after the financial markets rejected her disastrous so-called mini-budget.

          "Unfortunately as a Conservative Party we seem to have lost our value of integrity and our economic competence," May said.

          May's own premiership was defined by her struggle to find a path to Brexit which pleased the Eurosceptic and remain elements of her party. She said that her biggest regret was not getting a deal passed — before reflecting that the need to devote time to other foreign affairs issues may have hampered her efforts.

          "You do have to spend quite a bit of time on foreign policy" as prime minister, May said. "It perhaps doesn't leave as much time for being with your colleagues in Parliament," she said, adding that "I wonder whether if I'd been able to spend more time with them, we would've had a different result."

          While she didn't mention Starmer, those words could be applied to the current premier, who's been dubbed "Never Here Keir" by British media for the amount of time he spends abroad, having racked up dozens of overseas visits since coming to power in July 2024.

          Starmer on Wednesday batted away implicit criticism of his travels from a Tory lawmaker as a "load of nonsense," pointing out that his engagement with foreign leaders had yielded progress on trade with the US, India and EU and was necessary at a "critical stage" of talks to end the conflict in Ukraine.

          May said that ultimately, the issue that's likely to determine the next general election, due in mid-2029, is the economy. Reform has led the national polls since April, with Labour and the Tories — the two parties that have dominated British politics for a century — around 10 points adrift and struggling to close the gap.

          May said she worries that in this increasingly "polarized world" politicians are losing the ability to compromise which she sees as central to government. She attributed the rise of populist parties such as Farage's in part to social media, which she said made politicians "feel they've got to be talking about what they're doing the whole time, putting it out there."

          "The trouble with that is it means it focuses it much more on them rather than on what the overall good is, what they're trying to achieve," she said. "In government, you don't just deliver by snapping your fingers."

          Source: Bloomberg Europe

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2025 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          FastBull Membership

          Not yet

          Purchase

          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com