Thailand And Cambodia Agree to Ceasefire After Five Days of Fighting

Political

Summary:

Cambodia and Thailand agreed to an "immediate and unconditional ceasefire" from midnight (1700 GMT) on Monday, in a bid to halt their deadliest conflict in more than a decade after five days of fierce fighting that has displaced more than 300,000 people.

After days of efforts by Malaysia, chair of the ASEAN regional bloc, the United States and China to bring both sides to the table, the two countries' leaders agreed to end hostilities, resume direct communications and create a mechanism to implement the truce. At least 36 people have been killed in the fighting, mostly civilians.

Following more than two hours of talks at his official residence in Putrajaya, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, flanked by Thai and Cambodian leaders, said he was ready to deploy a team to observe and ensure implementation.

"This is a vital first step towards de-escalation and the restoration of peace and security," he told a press conference.

"All parties shared a commitment to peace."

BORDER DISPUTE HAS FESTERED FOR DECADES

The Southeast Asian neighbours have wrangled for decades over border territory and have been on a conflict footing since the killing of a Cambodian soldier in a skirmish late in May, which led to a troop buildup on both sides. A full-blown diplomatic crisis brought Thailand's fragile coalition government to the brink of collapse.

They accuse each other of starting the fighting last week, both quickly deploying heavy artillery at multiple points along their 800-km (500-mile) land border. Thailand flew air raids with an F-16 fighter jet.

U.S. President Donald Trump called both leaders at the weekend, warning he would not conclude trade deals with them unless they ended the fighting. Both sides are facing a steep import tariff of 36% on their goods in the U.S., their top export market.

Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet thanked his acting Thai counterpart Phumtham Wechayachai for what he said was a positive role and said he deeply appreciated Trump's "decisive mediation" and China's constructive participation.

"We agreed that the fighting will stop immediately," he said, expressing confidence that both sides could rebuild trust and confidence.

"The solutions proposed by Prime Minister Anwar will set the conditions for moving forward with bilateral discussions, returning to normalcy, and forming the foundation for future de-escalation."

Responding to the ceasefire, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Trump "made this happen".

"Give him the Nobel Peace Prize!" Leavitt posted on X.

Tensions boiled over last week after Thailand recalled its ambassador to Phnom Penh and expelled Cambodia's envoy, in response to a second Thai soldier losing a limb to a landmine that Bangkok alleged Cambodian troops had recently laid.

Cambodia has strongly denied the charge, as well as Thai accusations that it has fired at civilian targets including schools and hospitals.

Hun Manet last week accused Thailand of "unprovoked and premeditated military aggression".

Thailand And Cambodia Agree to Ceasefire After Five Days of Fighting_1

This map shows the locations where military clashes have occurred along the disputed border between Thailand and Cambodia.

IN GOOD FAITH

Thai leader Phumtham, who had expressed doubts about Cambodia's sincerity, said Bangkok had agreed to a ceasefire that would be "carried out successfully in good faith by both sides".

"Today's outcome reflects Thailand's desire for peaceful resolution by continuing to protect our sovereignty and the life of our people," he said, thanking Trump and Malaysia.

The fighting has scarred border communities on both sides.

In Thailand's Sisaket province, a house lay reduced to splintered wood and twisted beams after being struck by artillery fire from Cambodia. The roof had caved in, windows hung by the frame and power lines drooped over the structure.

Amid the din of occasional artillery fire, homes and shops remained shut and a four-lane road was deserted except for a few cars and military vehicles.

Dozens of displaced residents lined up quietly for their evening meal at an evacuation centre about 40 km away from the frontlines.

A few children played with dogs, others swept the dusty floor.

Fifty-four-year-old Nong Ngarmsri just wanted to go back to her village.

"I want to go to my children who stayed back," she said. "I want them to cease firing so that I can go home."

Source: Reuters

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Adam

Commodity

Copper rose along with equities after the European Union’s deal with the US averted a damaging rift between the two major economies, while traders watch for final details on imminent US tariffs on the industrial metal.

Benchmark prices edged higher on the London Metal Exchange, following a tariff agreement that will see the EU face 15% levies on most exports. The deal comes ahead of a US-China meeting in Stockholm that’s expected to extend a trade truce for 90 more days.

But for copper, the most anticipated development will be the launch of a touted 50% tariff on the metal, with details still unclear ahead of their planned start date on Friday.

President Donald Trump’s administration hasn’t so far confirmed important aspects of the duties, including which products will be covered, whether supplies from all nations will be hit equally, or how metal already on its way to US shores will be treated.

Global traders have shipped massive amounts of copper to America to get ahead of tariffs, and Trump’s announcement of an Aug. 1 deadline earlier this month triggered a last-minute scramble. Prices in the US are now much higher than those on the LME, but they don’t fully reflect a 50% universal tariff rate on all exchange-traded copper. The premium now stands at about 30%.

Further important developments lie ahead this week. The Federal Reserve is expect to keep rates unchanged at the conclusion of its policy meeting on Wednesday, but its commentary will be scrutinized for clues on what comes next. There’s also a deluge of US data, from the latest on economic growth to jobs.

Copper rose 0.6% to $9,824.50 a ton on the LME as of 11:51 a.m. in London. Aluminum was steady while zinc and nickel both edged 0.6% lower. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rose 0.4%.

Source: Bloomberg

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Warren Takunda

Economic

China–U.S. Trade War

President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump’s threat of a 30% rate if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1.

The tariffs, or import taxes, paid when Americans buy European products could raise prices for U.S. consumers and dent profits for European companies and their partners who bring goods into the country.

Here are some things to know about the trade deal between the United States and the European Union:

Many details remain to be decided

Trump and von der Leyen’s announcement, made during Trump’s visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many details to be filled in.

The headline figure is a 15% tariff rate on “the vast majority” of European goods brought into the U.S., including cars, computer chips and pharmaceuticals. It’s lower than the 20% Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50% and then 30%.

Von der Leyen said the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of “strategic” goods: Aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking.

She said the two sides “would keep working” to add more products to the list.

Additionally, the EU side would purchase what Trump said was $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel to replace Russian energy supplies, and Europeans would invest an additional $600 billion (511 billion euros) in the U.S.

50% U.S. tariff on steel stays and others might, too

Trump said the 50% U.S. tariff on imported steel would remain; von der Leyen said the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs and establish import quotas — that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate.

Trump said pharmaceuticals were not included in the deal. Von der Leyen said the pharmaceuticals issue was “on a separate sheet of paper” from Sunday’s deal.

Where the $600 billion for additional investment would come from was not specified. And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that “there were tariffs that could not be lowered,” without specifying which products.

The 15% rate is higher than in the past

The 15% rate removes Trump’s threat of a 30% tariff. It’s still much higher than the average tariff before Trump came into office of around 1%, and higher than Trump’s minimum 10% baseline tariff.

Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the U.S. would have to either increase prices for consumers — risking loss of market share — or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy.

The 10% baseline applied while the deal was negotiated was already sufficiently high to make the European Union’s executive commission cut its growth forecast for this year from 1.3% to 0.9%.

Von der Leyen said the 15% rate was “the best we could do” and credited the deal with maintaining access to the U.S. market and providing “stability and predictability for companies on both sides.”

The reaction is tentative

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal which avoided “an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations” and said that “we were able to preserve our core interests,” while adding that “I would have very much wished for further relief in transatlantic trade.”

The Federation of German Industries was blunter. “Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry,” said Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the federation’s leadership.

While the rate is lower than threatened, “the big caveat to today’s deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet,” said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank.

“With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, today’s agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy,” Brzeski said.

“This risk seems to have been avoided.”

Car companies expect higher prices

Asked if European carmakers could still sell cars at 15%, von der Leyen said the rate was much lower than the current 27.5%. That has been the rate under Trump’s 25% tariff on cars from all countries, plus the preexisting U.S. car tariff of 2.5%.

The impact is likely to be substantial on some companies, given that automaker Volkswagen said it suffered a 1.3 billion euro ($1.5 billion) hit to profit in the first half of the year from the higher tariffs.

Mercedes-Benz dealers in the U.S. have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices “until further notice.” The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo “significant increases” in coming years.

Trump had cited the trade gap with Europe

Before Trump returned to office, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with some 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in annual trade. Together the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. The U.S. rate averaged 1.47% for European goods, while the EU’s averaged 1.35% for American products, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels.

Trump has complained about the EU’s 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said the European market is not open enough for U.S.-made cars.

However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. And some 30% of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank.

Source: AP

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Glendon

Commodity

Oil rose after President Donald Trump said he would reduce the deadline for Russia to agree to a truce in Ukraine, compounding earlier gains from a US-European Union trade deal.

Brent was near $70 a barrel after closing 1.1% lower on Friday. Trump said the EU had agreed to buy $750 billion in American energy products, although he and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen appeared to differ on some key details of the agreement.

Later on Monday, Trump also said he would reduce a 50-day deadline he gave to Vladimir Putin to achieve a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. He said he was disappointed the Russian president hadn’t already agreed to a truce. Trump previously threatened Moscow with 100% “secondary tariffs” unless the conflict halts within 50 days.

Trump’s trade policies and threats of retaliation from targeted countries for months have raised concerns about the outlook for energy demand should global economic growth slow, while a decision by OPEC+ to rapidly increase output has put the market on track for oversupply later this year.

An OPEC+ committee will convene later on Monday to assess the oil market ahead of a meeting on Sunday to decide on production policy for September. Traders and analysts expect the group to hike its quota again.

US and Chinese officials are scheduled to meet on Monday for trade talks, and the South China Morning Post reported that the two countries are expected to extend their tariff truce, according to people it didn’t identify.

Source: Yahoo Finance

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Forex

Market Overview

The U.S. dollar began the week on solid ground, extending its recovery and holding firm above 97.40 on the Dollar Index (DXY). The greenback drew support from upbeat macro data, easing recession concerns, and renewed optimism around global trade negotiations.

Economic Resilience Supports Greenback

Recent U.S. data helped stabilize sentiment. Initial Jobless Claims and PMI readings surprised to the upside, easing fears of economic slowdown.

While headline Durable Goods Orders declined 9.3% in June, mainly due to a drop in aircraft orders, core figures pointed to steady manufacturing activity.

The 10-year Treasury yield hovered near 4.39%, signaling that investors expect stable growth while awaiting clearer guidance from the Federal Reserve.

Fed Policy in Focus Amid Political Pressure

Speculation surrounding the Fed’s next move intensified following President Trump’s unusual visit to the central bank, where he reiterated calls for rate cuts. Despite this pressure, Chair Jerome Powell has remained cautious.

According to a Reuters poll, most analysts expect rates to stay at 4.25%–4.50% during this week’s meeting, with a potential cut delayed until September.

Global Trade Progress and Diplomacy Boost Outlook

The dollar also benefited from U.S. trade progress with Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the U.K., which helped ease global risk sentiment.

Investors are closely watching U.S.-EU negotiations and Monday’s plan, key events that could shape the international trade landscape and further influence dollar dynamics.

US Dollar Index (DXY) – Technical Analysis

The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) is trading near 97.67, holding just above short-term support at 97.52 after recovering from its recent low. Price has climbed back toward the 50-EMA (97.63) and is currently testing resistance near the 100-EMA (97.75).

A sustained move above these levels would put 98.18 and 98.52 back in focus. However, momentum is mixed as price hesitates near both moving averages. On the downside, if 97.52 breaks, the trendline support near 97.13 becomes the next key level to monitor.

The short-term outlook remains uncertain, with bulls needing a clean break above 97.90 to regain control.

GBP/USD Technical Analysis

GBP/USD is trading near 1.3436 after rejecting both the 50-EMA (1.3493) and ascending trendline support, signaling a short-term breakdown. The recent drop came after a failed attempt to break above 1.3517, with sellers regaining momentum.

Price is now consolidating just below key resistance at 1.3462, while support rests near 1.3376. A bounce above 1.3462 could reintroduce bullish momentum, but the structure favors bears as long as the pair trades below the converging EMAs.

If downside pressure persists, further losses toward 1.3331 and 1.3286 may unfold. A clear break above the descending resistance line is needed to shift the bias.

EUR/USD Technical Forecast

EUR/USD is trading around 1.1740, holding within an upward channel that has guided price since mid-July. The pair recently bounced off dynamic support near the 50-EMA (1.1728) and 100-EMA (1.1708), suggesting buyers are defending the short-term trend.

However, momentum remains neutral as price consolidates below the 1.1788 resistance zone. A close above that level could confirm bullish continuation toward the 1.1823–1.1861 region. On the downside, key support levels lie at 1.1720 and 1.1704.

Source: fxempire

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Winkelmann

Cryptocurrency

Economic

What is the South Korea Stablecoin Bill All About?

At its core, the upcoming South Korea stablecoin bill, spearheaded by DPK lawmaker Ahn Do-geol, aims to establish a clear regulatory pathway for stablecoins pegged to the Korean Won. Unlike previous, broader digital asset proposals, Ahn’s bill is specifically designed to address the unique characteristics and challenges of value-stable digital assets. It’s a targeted approach, focusing on:

● Issuance: Defining who can issue Korean Won-pegged stablecoins and under what conditions. This will likely involve strict requirements for reserves and auditing to ensure the stablecoin maintains its peg.

● Circulation: Regulating how these stablecoins are traded, transferred, and used within the South Korean economy. This could cover aspects like anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) compliance.

● Oversight: Establishing a framework for government bodies to monitor and supervise stablecoin operations, ensuring compliance and market integrity.

While DPK lawmaker Min Byeong-dug introduced a broader basic digital asset act last month that touched upon stablecoins, Ahn’s proposal, set for July 28, is poised to be the first dedicated and comprehensive piece of legislation. Furthermore, there’s anticipation that Kim Eun-hye of the opposition People Power Party (PPP) will also introduce a similar bill, highlighting a bipartisan recognition of the urgent need for stablecoin regulation.

Why is This South Korea Stablecoin Bill a Game Changer?

The introduction of a dedicated South Korea stablecoin bill is more than just another piece of legislation; it’s a transformative step for several reasons:

1. Enhancing Consumer Protection: The primary driver behind this regulation is likely the protection of investors and users. By mandating transparent reserves and robust oversight, the bill aims to prevent scenarios akin to the Terra-Luna collapse, where a lack of regulation led to significant financial losses. This will foster greater trust in stablecoins and the broader digital asset ecosystem.

2. Fostering Financial Stability: Stablecoins, by their nature, aim to bridge the gap between volatile cryptocurrencies and traditional fiat currencies. Unregulated stablecoins, however, can pose systemic risks if their reserves are not properly managed. This bill seeks to integrate stablecoins safely into the financial system, mitigating potential risks to national financial stability.

3. Promoting Innovation with Clarity: While regulation might sometimes be perceived as a hindrance, a clear regulatory framework can actually spur innovation. By providing legal certainty, businesses and developers will have a clearer understanding of the rules, encouraging them to build new services and applications utilizing Korean Won-pegged stablecoins without fear of sudden regulatory shifts.

4. Boosting Global Competitiveness: As nations worldwide grapple with crypto regulation, South Korea’s proactive stance with a dedicated South Korea stablecoin bill positions it as a leader in responsible digital asset adoption. This could attract foreign investment and foster a vibrant domestic blockchain industry, enhancing the country’s competitiveness in the global digital economy.

Who Are the Key Players Behind the South Korea Stablecoin Bill?

The legislative landscape for digital assets in South Korea is dynamic, with several key figures championing different approaches:

● Ahn Do-geol (DPK): The primary sponsor of the upcoming comprehensive South Korea stablecoin bill. As a member of the National Assembly’s Strategy and Finance Committee, his proposal is expected to be detailed and impactful, focusing specifically on Won-pegged stablecoins. His focus on issuance, circulation, and oversight suggests a thorough understanding of the stablecoin mechanism.

● Min Byeong-dug (DPK): Introduced a broader basic digital asset act last month. While his bill included references to stablecoins, it was more general in scope, aiming to lay foundational rules for the entire digital asset market. Ahn’s bill can be seen as a more specialized follow-up to this broader framework.

● Kim Eun-hye (PPP): A member of the opposition People Power Party, Kim Eun-hye is also anticipated to propose a similar bill this week. The potential for bipartisan consensus on stablecoin regulation underscores the perceived urgency and importance of the issue across the political spectrum in South Korea. This collaboration could lead to more robust and widely accepted legislation.

The interplay between these lawmakers and their respective proposals highlights a concerted effort within South Korea’s political arena to address the burgeoning digital asset market with careful consideration.

What Challenges and Opportunities Does the South Korea Stablecoin Bill Present?

Every significant regulatory move comes with its own set of challenges and opportunities. The proposed South Korea stablecoin bill is no exception:

Challenges:

● Balancing Innovation and Regulation: A key challenge will be striking the right balance. Overly stringent regulations could stifle innovation and push crypto activities underground or offshore. The bill needs to be robust enough to protect, but flexible enough to allow growth.

● Defining “Stable”: The concept of stability in the digital asset world can be complex. The bill will need clear definitions for what constitutes a “stable” asset and how its peg is maintained and verified.

● Enforcement and Resources: Implementing and enforcing new regulations will require significant resources and expertise from regulatory bodies. Ensuring they have the tools and knowledge to oversee a rapidly evolving sector is crucial.

● Cross-Border Implications: Stablecoins operate globally. The bill will need to consider how it interacts with international regulations and how to prevent regulatory arbitrage.

Opportunities:

● Increased Institutional Adoption: Regulatory clarity often paves the way for greater institutional participation. Banks, financial institutions, and large corporations may be more willing to engage with stablecoins once a clear legal framework is in place.

● New Business Models: The bill could enable new business models built on regulated stablecoins, such as streamlined international remittances, enhanced payment systems, and innovative financial products.

● Investor Confidence: A regulated environment will undoubtedly boost investor confidence, attracting more retail and institutional capital into the South Korean digital asset market.

● Global Leadership: By setting a precedent for comprehensive stablecoin regulation, South Korea could become a model for other nations looking to integrate digital assets responsibly.

How Does the South Korea Stablecoin Bill Compare Globally?

South Korea’s move is part of a broader global trend towards stablecoin regulation. Here’s how it stacks up against other major jurisdictions:

Jurisdiction	Regulatory Approach to Stablecoins	Key Highlights
South Korea	Targeted, comprehensive bill for Won-pegged stablecoins.	Focus on issuance, circulation, and oversight. Aim to protect consumers and foster financial stability.
United States	Fragmented, ongoing discussions.	Various proposals (e.g., Lummis-Gillibrand bill, Treasury reports). SEC and CFTC vie for oversight. Emphasis on reserve requirements and systemic risk.
European Union	MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulation.	Comprehensive framework covering all crypto assets, including stablecoins. Strict rules for e-money tokens (EMT) and asset-referenced tokens (ART), focusing on reserves, governance, and consumer protection.
United Kingdom	Integrating stablecoins into existing financial regulations.	Consultations to bring stablecoins under the Electronic Money Regulations and Payment Systems Regulations. Focus on systemic stablecoins.

While different jurisdictions have varying speeds and approaches, the common thread is a recognition of stablecoins’ potential and the necessity for robust regulation to manage associated risks. South Korea’s specific focus on Won-pegged stablecoins highlights a national interest in controlling the digital representation of its own currency.

What’s Next for the South Korea Stablecoin Bill?

The journey for the South Korea stablecoin bill is just beginning. Once proposed, it will undergo a rigorous legislative process, including committee reviews, public hearings, and votes in the National Assembly. This process allows for amendments and ensures that various stakeholders’ perspectives are considered.

For individuals and businesses involved in the South Korean crypto space, staying informed will be paramount. Monitoring the legislative developments, understanding the implications of the proposed regulations, and preparing for compliance will be crucial. This bill has the potential to reshape how stablecoins are perceived and utilized in one of Asia’s most technologically advanced nations.

Conclusion: A New Horizon for Digital Assets

The impending proposal of South Korea’s first comprehensive South Korea stablecoin bill marks a significant milestone in the global journey towards responsible digital asset integration. By focusing on the issuance, circulation, and oversight of Korean Won-pegged stablecoins, lawmakers aim to establish a framework that protects consumers, enhances financial stability, and fosters innovation within a clear regulatory environment. This pioneering legislative effort positions South Korea as a key player in shaping the future of digital finance, offering a beacon of clarity in an often-unpredictable market. As the world watches, South Korea’s commitment to thoughtful regulation could very well set a new standard for how nations embrace the transformative potential of stablecoins.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What exactly is a stablecoin?

A stablecoin is a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a stable value, usually pegged to a fiat currency like the US Dollar or Korean Won, or to a commodity like gold. This stability is typically achieved by holding an equivalent amount of reserves in traditional assets.

Q2: Why is South Korea focusing on regulating stablecoins now?

South Korea is focusing on stablecoin regulation to enhance consumer protection, prevent financial instability, and provide legal clarity for businesses. Recent events in the crypto market have highlighted the risks associated with unregulated stablecoins, prompting a proactive legislative response.

Q3: How does Ahn Do-geol’s stablecoin bill differ from Min Byeong-dug’s broader digital asset act?

Min Byeong-dug’s act is a more general framework for all digital assets, including some references to stablecoins. Ahn Do-geol’s bill, however, is specifically and comprehensively dedicated to the issuance, circulation, and oversight of Korean Won-pegged stablecoins, making it the first of its kind in South Korea.

Q4: How will this South Korea stablecoin bill impact cryptocurrency users and businesses in South Korea?

For users, the bill is expected to increase trust and safety when dealing with Won-pegged stablecoins due to enhanced consumer protection and transparent reserve requirements. For businesses, it will provide regulatory clarity, potentially leading to increased institutional adoption and the development of new, compliant stablecoin-based services.

Q5: Will this bill affect global stablecoin projects like USDT or USDC in South Korea?

While Ahn Do-geol’s bill primarily focuses on Korean Won-pegged stablecoins, it sets a precedent for how South Korea views and regulates stable assets. It may influence future regulations concerning foreign-pegged stablecoins or prompt their issuers to seek local compliance to operate within South Korea.

Source: CryptoSlate

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Michelle

Cryptocurrency

Ethereum (ETH) has been trading at a significant price point, with the digital asset now nearing a key resistance level of $4000. This mark has drawn attention due to its potential to shape the next movement in the market.

According to Crypto Patel, Ethereum's recent price rally has sparked optimism among investors, especially those who purchased the asset when its value was below $1500. As ETH continues its upward trajectory, traders are focused on the $4000 level, which has been acting as a multi-month resistance.

Ethereum breakout | Source: X

Ethereum breaks through this level, and there are expectations that it could head towards its previous all-time high (ATH) of $6000 or more. A sustained breakout above this resistance could signal continued strength in the asset's price. If rejected at this level, some experts anticipate a decline, potentially pulling ETH back below the $3500-$3200 range.

Resistance and Support Dynamics

Crypto analyst ZAYK Charts notes that if Ethereum manages to break above $4,000, it could open the door for a potential surge toward the $6,000 mark, a significant increase from its current price.

A successful breakout could indicate continued strength and set the stage for further price growth in the coming months. However, it could also establish the $4000 level as a new support zone, further reinforcing the bullish sentiment surrounding Ethereum.

Ethereum Bullish | Source: X

Both short-term traders and long-term investors closely watch this price action. Many are considering the potential for Ethereum to move higher if the resistance at $4000 is cleared.

Ethereum’s Trading Volume and Market Sentiment

At the time of writing, ETH is priced at approximately $3,890, reflecting a 3.10% increase in the last 24 hours. Ethereum remains active in terms of trading volume, with over $34 billion in transactions reported within the past 24 hours.

Despite this significant trading activity, market observers remain cautious as Ethereum faces its next critical decision point. Should the asset manage to surpass this level, a strong bullish trend may continue.

Conversely, a rejection could lead to a consolidation phase or a downward adjustment in price. Traders are advised to monitor this crucial level closely.