• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Trending
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
BID
ASK
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6857.13
6857.13
6857.13
6865.94
6827.13
+7.41
+ 0.11%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
47850.93
47850.93
47850.93
48049.72
47692.96
-31.96
-0.07%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23505.13
23505.13
23505.13
23528.53
23372.33
+51.04
+ 0.22%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
98.830
98.910
98.830
98.980
98.810
-0.150
-0.15%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.16593
1.16600
1.16593
1.16613
1.16408
+0.00148
+ 0.13%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.33506
1.33513
1.33506
1.33519
1.33165
+0.00235
+ 0.18%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4225.88
4226.29
4225.88
4229.22
4194.54
+18.71
+ 0.44%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
59.302
59.339
59.302
59.469
59.187
-0.081
-0.14%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

Ukmto Says A Vessel Reports Sighting Small Craft At A Range Of 1-2 Cables And They Are Under Fire

Share

Ukmto Says It Received Reports Of An Incident 15 Nm West Of Yemen

Share

Dollar/Yen Falls To 154.46, Lowest Since November 17

Share

Citigroup Sets 2026 STOXX 600 Target At 640 On Fiscal Tailwinds

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief Malhotra On Rupee: Fluctuations Can Happen, Effort Is To Reduce Undue Volatility

Share

Reserve Bank Of India Chief Malhotra On Rupee: Allow Markets To Determine Levels On Currency

Share

Sri Lanka's CSE All Share Index Down 1.2%

Share

Iw Institute: German Economy Faces Tepid Growth In 2026 Due To Global Trade Slowdown

Share

Stats Office - Seychelles November Inflation At 0.02% Year-On-Year

Share

[Market Update] Spot Silver Prices Rose 2.00% Intraday, Currently Trading At $58.27 Per Ounce

Share

S.Africa's Gross Reserves At $72.068 Billion At End November - Central Bank

Share

[Market Update] Spot Silver Broke Through $58/ounce, Up 1.56% On The Day

Share

Dollar/Yen Down 0.33% To 154.61

Share

Kremlin Says No Plans For Putin-Trump Call For Now

Share

Kremlin Says Moscow Is Waiting For USA Reaction After Putin-Witkoff Meeting

Share

Cctv - China, France: Say Both Sides Support All Efforts For A Ceasefire, Restore Peace According To Intl Law

Share

[Chinese Ambassador To The US Xie Feng Hopes Chinese And American Business Communities Will Focus On Three Lists] On December 4, Chinese Ambassador To The US Xie Feng Delivered A Speech At The China-US Economic And Trade Cooperation Forum Jointly Hosted By The China Council For The Promotion Of International Trade And The Meridian International Center. Xie Feng Said That In November 2026, China Will Host The APEC Leaders' Informal Meeting For The Third Time In Shenzhen, Guangdong Province. In December 2026, The United States Will Also Host The G20 Meeting. Regarding How Chinese And American Business Communities Can Seize These Opportunities, He Suggested Focusing On Three Lists: First, Continue To Expand The Dialogue List; Second, Continuously Lengthen The Cooperation List; And Third, Constantly Reduce The Problem List

Share

India's Nifty Financial Services Index Extends Gains, Last Up 0.75%

Share

Eni : Jp Morgan Cuts To Underweight From Overweight

Share

Cctv - China, France: Signed Protocol On Sanitary, Phytosanitary Requirements For Export Of French Alfalfa Grass

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
Turkey Trade Balance

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany Construction PMI (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone IHS Markit Construction PMI (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Italy IHS Markit Construction PMI (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Markit/CIPS Construction PMI (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

France 10-Year OAT Auction Avg. Yield

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Retail Sales MoM (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Retail Sales YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Brazil GDP YoY (Q3)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Challenger Job Cuts (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Challenger Job Cuts MoM (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Challenger Job Cuts YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Initial Jobless Claims 4-Week Avg. (SA)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Initial Jobless Claims (SA)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Continued Jobless Claims (SA)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Ivey PMI (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Ivey PMI (Not SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders Revised MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (SA) (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Excl. Transport) (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Weekly Natural Gas Stocks Change

A:--

F: --

P: --

Saudi Arabia Crude Oil Production

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Treasuries Held by Foreign Central Banks

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Foreign Exchange Reserves (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Repo Rate

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Benchmark Interest Rate

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Reverse Repo Rate

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Cash Reserve Ratio

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Leading Indicators Prelim (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Halifax House Price Index YoY (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Halifax House Price Index MoM (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

France Current Account (Not SA) (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

France Trade Balance (SA) (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

France Industrial Output MoM (SA) (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Italy Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Employment YoY (SA) (Q3)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Final YoY (Q3)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Final QoQ (Q3)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Employment Final QoQ (SA) (Q3)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Employment Final (SA) (Q3)

--

F: --

P: --
Brazil PPI MoM (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Mexico Consumer Confidence Index (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Unemployment Rate (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Labor Force Participation Rate (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Employment (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Part-Time Employment (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Full-time Employment (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PCE Price Index YoY (SA) (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Personal Outlays MoM (SA) (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Core PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. UMich 5-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Prelim YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Core PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. 5-10 Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. UMich Consumer Expectations Index Prelim (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    Connecting
    .
    .
    .
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          Bitcoin Price Rebounds To $91,000 Amid Institutional Buying

          Olivia Brooks

          Cryptocurrency

          Summary:

          What to know Bitcoin surges to $91,000 due to institutional interest. Driven by Fed rate cut expectations. Investor confidence grows despite previous decline.

          ●Bitcoin surges to $91,000 due to institutional interest.
          ●Driven by Fed rate cut expectations.
          ●Investor confidence grows despite previous decline.

          Bitcoin's price has surged back to $91,000 as of late November 2025, buoyed by institutional investor activity and favorable macroeconomic signals, notably due to potential Federal Reserve rate cuts.

          This resurgence highlights market sensitivity to economic policy shifts, influencing both Bitcoin's valuation and wider cryptocurrency sentiment, with Ethereum also seeing gains above $3,000.

          Bitcoin's price reached $91,000 in late November 2025, marking a strong recovery from previous lows near $80,000.

          This rebound matters as it signals renewed institutional interest and aligns with expectations for a potential Federal Reserve rate cut.

          Institutional Demand Boosts Bitcoin to $91,000

          Bitcoin has experienced a notable recovery attributed to macroeconomic optimism and institutional investor movements. Wall Street's growing interest in digital assets has driven increased trading volumes. Experts highlight support levels as crucial for ongoing price rallies.

          The rebound follows an approximately 20% decline over the past month, impacted by market fluctuations and selling pressure from US-based investors. Analysts like Daan Crypto Trades emphasize the importance of the $89,000-$91,000 range.

          Market Sees Surge as Fed Rate Cut Anticipated

          The immediate effect on the cryptocurrency market has been significant, with a surge in trading volumes and increased buying pressure. Institutional trading volumes hitting $78 billion indicate significant inflows pushing the price above $91,000. Institutional investors leading the charge reflect heightened confidence.

          Economically, expectations of a Federal Reserve rate cut have bolstered risk asset sentiment, further influencing Bitcoin's price trajectory. Ethereum similarly reacted, surpassing the $3,000 mark.

          History of Bitcoin Rallies Following Monetary Easing

          Similar rebounds have been observed during periods of anticipated monetary easing. Historical trends show support levels around $89,000-$91,000 often foreshadowing further rallies.

          Experts speculate on potential outcomes, citing past rallies where sustained price levels led to significant gains. Michael Feroli, Economist at J.P. Morgan, noted,

          "While the next FOMC meeting remains a close call, we now believe the latest round of Fedspeak tilts the odds toward the Committee deciding to cut rates in two weeks from today,"

          linking to increased BTC bullish sentiment.

          Continued institutional interest and macroeconomic factors remain pivotal for future price stability.

          Source: CryptoSlate

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Shorting US Stocks Is Risky as Economic Strength and AI Momentum Fuel Bullish Pressure

          Gerik

          Economic

          Stocks

          AI Optimism and Economic Resilience Undermine Short Positions

          As 2025 draws to a close, 22V Research warns that betting against U.S. equities could prove costly. According to strategists led by Dennis Debusschere, robust consumer spending and continued capital expenditure on artificial intelligence projects are reinforcing market fundamentals. This combination could sustain corporate earnings and propel stocks higher, despite intermittent volatility and fears of overvaluation in the AI sector.
          Shorting equities, they argue, requires a high conviction that the economic backdrop will materially weaken or that AI investment will sharply reverse—two scenarios that currently lack strong evidence.

          Short Sellers Whipsawed by Market Reversals

          Recent market action illustrates how treacherous it has become for short sellers. U.S. equity short positions incurred $80 billion in mark-to-market losses in the final week of November alone, according to S3 Partners. These losses effectively erased the nearly $95 billion in gains accumulated earlier that month. The rapid reversal reflects a causal relationship between market momentum shifts and the forced unwinding of bearish bets.
          Hedge funds responded by covering index and ETF shorts at the fastest pace in five months, Goldman Sachs data shows. This reaction further contributed to market rallies, fueling a feedback loop where every market dip draws in buyers and punishes bearish positioning.

          Corporate Earnings and Consumer Spending Show Resilience

          Despite lingering concerns over inflation and a softening labor market, corporate fundamentals remain supportive of equity valuations. Strategas Asset Management forecasts 12.5% profit growth over the next year for U.S. companies. Meanwhile, consumer demand has held firm. Mastercard SpendingPulse data showed Black Friday sales rose 4.1% year-over-year, reflecting resilient consumption that continues to support earnings growth.
          These data points challenge the bearish narrative that elevated rates and slowing employment will drag on the economy. Instead, they reinforce the view that economic conditions remain broadly favorable, making bearish strategies riskier.

          Federal Reserve Rate Cut Expectations Add to Bullish Momentum

          Another critical factor supporting the market is the anticipated policy shift from the Federal Reserve. A rate cut is now expected at the upcoming December 9–10 meeting, a development that could stimulate further economic activity and ease financial conditions. This expectation has helped flip 22V’s proprietary quantitative model into what they call an “everything rally,” signaling broad-based bullish momentum across asset classes.
          December is historically one of the most favorable months for equities. The S&P 500 has posted an average gain of 1.4% during the month and finished higher 73% of the time, according to LPL Financial. The rally typically intensifies in the second half of the month, building around the 11th trading day. This seasonal pattern compounds the risk for short sellers who may be forced to cover in anticipation of or in response to accelerating gains.
          The experience of Beyond Meat, which soared 37% in a single day despite no fundamental news, exemplifies the risk of sharp short squeezes. From a low of $0.52 in mid-October, the stock surged nearly sevenfold before collapsing again. As Roundhill Investments CEO Dave Mazza notes, the cost of holding bearish positions is rising fast in an environment where sentiment can pivot overnight.

          Shorting in a Bullish Macro Environment Is Increasingly Hazardous

          While volatility and policy uncertainty remain, the underlying strength of the U.S. economy and ongoing enthusiasm for AI-driven innovation have made it difficult for bearish investors to maintain positions. Strong corporate earnings, healthy consumer spending, and favorable seasonal trends all contribute to an environment where dips are being consistently bought, forcing short sellers to unwind and driving markets higher.
          Unless clear signs of macroeconomic deterioration or a collapse in AI capital expenditure emerge, the structural forces currently favor bulls. For now, shorting U.S. equities remains a high-risk endeavor in a market environment driven by both fundamentals and momentum.

          Source: Bloomberg

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Could The Houthis Use Chemical Weapons?

          Winkelmann

          Political

          Economic

          While lacking the scientific infrastructure necessary for a full-blown chemical weapons program, the Houthis could still renew their threat to Red Sea shipping.

          Yemen's Iran-backed Houthis have dominated headlines since November 2023, when they launched a major offensive on international maritime traffic in the Red Sea and on Israeli territory. However, the group may be going through another alarming evolution.

          In September, Yemeni minister of information Moammar Eryani accused the Houthis of manufacturing chemical weapons from components smuggled from Iran. He claimed that the rebels had "secret laboratories" where they were producing and testing toxic, chemical, and biological agents that they intended to mount on ballistic missiles and drones.

          The accusation followed reports from weeks earlier that Yemeni government forces had seized a 750-ton weapon shipment from Iran that included both chemical and conventional weapons camouflaged as generators, electrical transformers, air pumps, and hydraulic columns. At this time, the content of that seizure and the intended use of the chemical weapons have not been confirmed by international actors or unbiased sources.

          While the Houthis themselves have never before employed chemical weapons, their use in terror attacks has precedent, particularly in the Middle East. While much attention has been dedicated to the Syrian and Iraqi governments' use of chemical weapons, even non-state actor groups in the region have been able to develop and deploy this form of warfare in the past. Sunni jihadist groups, such as the Islamic State (ISIS), have a history of employing this type of weaponry. In 2015, the group made an evolutionary leap when they armed a projectile delivery system with chemical warfare agents.

          But what could a Houthi chemical weapon strategy look like?

          The group will need to build its chemical weapons program around two very important factors: technical expertise and availability of components. Given Yemen's porous borders, extensive smuggling networks, and Iran's demonstrated willingness to supply unconventional capabilities, the most likely path for the Houthis to find components would be to acquire bulk dual‑use chemical precursors (common industrial or agricultural chemicals that can also be repurposed to produce toxic agents) or ready-made toxic munitions from external suppliers.

          Then the group would likely adapt its existing technologies, like drones and missiles, to carry the toxic chemical components. While that would require overcoming significant technical, safety, and logistical hurdles, those barriers could be substantially lowered by external suppliers, technical assistance, and the group's existing delivery infrastructure.

          Executing a large-scale chemical weapon strategy, including one that could potentially continue to upend maritime traffic, will not be something the Houthis can accomplish overnight. Producing, stabilizing, and effectively dispersing toxic agents is technically demanding and risky for the user. Looking at past examples, it was not until ISIS established its territorial caliphate in 2014—giving it access to laboratory equipment, secure labs, and precursor chemicals—that it was able to develop chemical weapons capability.

          While the Houthis have an unchallenged territorial base that would allow them to establish these labs, the Yemeni government never had the industrial base or scientific infrastructure for the group to "piggyback" off of. However, Iran, which has a history of sending technical trainers to the Houthis, began developing a chemical weapons program decades ago during the Iran-Iraq war.

          Recognizing these challenges, it is likely that the Houthis' first foray into chemical warfare would be characterized by small-scale attacks that utilize crude delivery mechanisms such as canisters of chemicals or roadside, water-borne, or vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (IEDs). But these smaller-scale attacks can still have a huge impact. Even a limited release of toxic industrial chemicals or improvised agents—substances that are often legitimately traded for agriculture, manufacturing, or medical use—could cause panic and civilian casualties. Moreover, the group's willingness to strike commercial shipping and port infrastructure could add a dangerous dimension.

          Using even a crude chemical weapon on a merchant ship or port—which are crowded, difficult to secure, and often operate under commercial rules of engagement—could pose risks for the crew and dockworkers while also forcing prolonged closures, mass evacuations, and multilateral rescue and decontamination operations. All of these could lead to higher insurance costs, rerouted shipping lanes, disrupted aid flows, and temporary shutdowns of chokepoints, all causing lasting disruptions to global supply chains. Attribution at sea is also more difficult, making deterrence and rapid diplomatic response complicated.

          In response to the Houthis' rumored chemical weapons development, the international community needs to push the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) to investigate such allegations and use diplomatic pressure to push for increased accountability from the Houthis.

          Simultaneously, the United States and allied navies active in the region need to strengthen interdiction of suspected weapons shipments through coordinated maritime patrols and port inspections, expand intelligence sharing among states and commercial operators, and increase naval escorting and monitoring of vulnerable convoys. Moreover, they need to prioritize broadening medical readiness in Yemen and neighboring states, stockpile appropriate protective equipment and countermeasures, and train first responders and maritime crews in the management of chemical incidents.

          The possibility that the Houthis are moving toward chemical capabilities—and the additional risk those capabilities pose to maritime commerce and coastal populations—is a red flag that deserves urgent and focused attention. The path from smuggled dual‑use components to effective chemical warfare will be difficult. Yet, even small-scale incidents could have devastating impacts on Yemen's vulnerable population, US regional allies, and international shipping.

          Source: The National Interest

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Overheating Financial Markets Reveal Data Center Capacity Strain

          Adam

          Economic

          The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) trading platforms were shut down for approximately 4 hours due to overheating after its cooling system at its Illinois data centre failed. The outage began around 10:00 p.m. ET on November 27, halting about 90% of global derivatives volume on the Globex platform across futures and options for equities, bonds, commodities, and currency markets.
          The incident stemmed from a chiller plant failure that knocked multiple cooling units offline, leading to data center overheating. While no major market chaos ensued due to thin post-holiday trading volumes, the lack of price discovery froze markets and frustrated traders worldwide.
          While this may appear to be a one-off technical problem, it should serve as a reminder of how vital data centers have become to the daily functioning of financial markets. With AI workloads growing by over 30% annually, the importance of data center cooling and the prevention of overheating is becoming increasingly critical.
          We may have gotten lucky with the timing of last week’s outage, but the next time we may not be so fortunate. Without the ability to trade derivatives and hedge price movements, sudden volatility due to another overheating incident could temporarily cripple the financial markets.
          High Beta And High Dividends
          There has been a strong negative correlation between the excess returns (vs. the S&P 500) of high-beta stocks and high-dividend stocks. During risk-on upward trends, high beta has been among the factors with the highest relative and absolute scores. Conversely, during these bullish episodes, the more conservative high dividend stocks have been among the bigger laggards.
          Today, after a decent rally over the past few days and market weakness over the three preceding weeks, we find that both high beta and high dividend stocks are among the most overbought on a relative basis, as we highlight below.
          However, the absolute analysis points to a key differentiator between the two. High dividend yield stocks are the most overbought on an absolute basis among all factors, while high beta is only slightly overbought. If the market can continue to rally, we suspect high-beta stocks will outperform high-dividend stocks. The second graphic shows the top ten stocks in the high beta ETF.
          Alternatively, if a subset of investors wants to chase the market more conservatively, high dividend stocks could keep up with high beta stocks if the market trends higher through December.
          Overheating Financial Markets Reveal Data Center Capacity Strain_1Overheating Financial Markets Reveal Data Center Capacity Strain_2

          Source: investing

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          A ‘seismic’ Nvidia shift, AI chip shortages and how it’s threatening to hike gadget prices

          Adam

          Economic

          The cost of your smartphone might rise, analysts are warning, as the AI boom clogs up supply chains and a recent change by Nvidia to its products could make it worse.
          AI data centers, on which tech giants globally are spending hundreds of billions of dollars, require chips from suppliers, like Nvidia, which relies on many different components and companies to create its coveted graphics processing units.
          But other companies like AMD , the hyperscalers like Google and Microsoft , and other component suppliers all rely on this supply chain.
          Many parts of the supply chain can’t keep up with demand, and it’s slowing down components that are critical for some of the world’s most popular consumer electronics. Those components are seeing huge spikes in prices, threatening price rises for the end product and could even lead to shortages of some devices.
          “We see the rapid increase in demand for AI in data centers driving bottlenecks in many areas,” Peter Hanbury, partner in the technology practice at Bain & Company, told CNBC.
          Where is the supply chain clogged?
          One of the starkest assessments came from Alibaba CEO Eddie Wu, CEO of Chinese tech giant Alibaba.
          Wu, whose company is building its own AI infrastructure and designs its own chips, said last week that there are shortages across semiconductor manufacturers, memory chips and storage devices like hard drives.
          “There is a situation of undersupply,” Wu said, adding that the “supply side is going to be a relatively large bottleneck.” He added this could last two to three years.
          Bain and Co.’s Hanbury said there are shortages of hard disk drives, or HDDs, which store data. HDDs are used in the data center. These are preferred by hyperscalers,: big companies like Microsoft and Google. But, with HDDs at capacity, these firms have shifted to using solid-state drives, or SSDs, another type of storage device.
          However, these SSDs are key components for consumer electronics.
          The other big focus is on a type of chip under the umbrella of memory called dynamic random-access memory or DRAM. Nvidia’s chips use high-bandwidth memory which is a type of chip that stacks multiple DRAM semiconductors.
          Memory prices have surged as a result of the huge demand and lack of supply. Counterpoint Research said it expects memory prices to rise 30% in the fourth quarter of this year and another 20% in early 2026. Even small imbalances in supply and demand can have major knock on effects on memory pricing. And because of the demand for HBM and GPUs, chipmakers are prioritizing these over other types of semiconductors.
          “DRAM is certainly a bottleneck as AI investments continue to feed the imbalance between demand and supply with HBM for AI being prioritized by chipmakers,” MS Hwang, research director at Counterpoint Research, told CNBC.
          “Imbalances of 1-2% can trigger sharp price increases and we’re seeing that figure hitting 3% levels at the moment – this is very significant.”
          Why are there issues?
          Building up capacity in various areas of the semiconductor supply chain can be capital-intensive. And it’s an industry that’s known to be risk-averse and did not add the capacity necessary to meet the projections provided by key industry players, Bain & Co.’s Hanbur said.
          “The direct cause of the shortage is the rapid increase in demand for data center chips,” Hanbury said.
          “Basically, the suppliers worried the market was too optimistic and they did not want to overbuild very expensive capacity so they did not build to the estimates provided by their customers. Now, the suppliers need to add capacity quickly but as we know, it takes 2-3 years to add semiconductor manufacturing fabs.”
          Nvidia at the center
          A lot of attention is on Nvidia given it dominates when it comes to the chips that are being put into AI data centers.
          It is a huge customer of high bandwidth memory, for example. And its products are manufactured by TSMC which also has other major customers like Apple.
          But analysts are focused on a change Nvidia has made to its products that has the potential to add major pressure to consumer electronics supply chains. The U.S. giant is increasingly shifting toward using a type of memory in its products called Low-Power Double Data Rate (LPDDR). This is seen as more power efficient than the previous Double Data Rate, or DDR memory.
          The problem is, Nvidia is increasingly using the latest generation of LPDDR memory, which is also used by high-end consumer electronics makers such as Samsung and Apple
          .
          Typically, the industry would just be dealing with demand for this product from a handful of big electronics players. But now Nvidia, which has huge scale, is entering the mix.
          “We also see a bigger risk on the horizon is with advanced memory as Nvidia’s recent pivot to LPDDR means they’re a customer on the scale of a major smartphone maker — a seismic shift for the supply chain which can’t easily absorb this scale of demand,” Hwang from Counterpoint Research said.
          How AI boom is impacting consumer electronics
          Here’s the link between all of this.
          From chip manufacturers like TSMC, Intel and Samsung, there is only so much capacity. If there is huge demand for certain types of chips, then these companies will prioritize those, especially from their larger customers. That can lead to shortages of other types of semiconductors elsewhere.
          Memory chips, in particular DRAM which has seen prices shoot up, is of particular concern because it’s used in so many devices from smartphones to laptops. And this could lead to price rises in the world’s favorite electronics.
          DRAM and storage represent around 10% to 25% of the bill of materials for a typical PC or smartphone, according to Hanbury of Bain & Co. A price increase of 20% to 30% in these components would increase the total bill of materials costs by 5% to 10%.
          “In terms of timing, the impact will likely start shortly as component costs are already increasing and likely accelerate into next year,” Hanbury said.
          On top of this, there is now demand from players involved in AI data centers like Nvidia, for components that would have typically been used for consumer devices such as LPDDR which adds more demand to a supply constrained market.
          If electronics firms can’t get their hands on the components needed for their devices because they’re in short supply or going toward AI data centers, then there could be shortages of the world’s most popular gadgets.
          “Beyond the rise in cost there’s a second issue and that’s the inability to secure enough components, which constrains the production of electronic devices,” Counterpoint Research’s Hwang said.
          What are tech firms saying?
          A number of electronics companies have warned about the impact they are seeing from all of this.
          Xiaomi , the third-biggest smartphone vendor globally, said it expects that consumers will see “a sizeable rise in product retail prices,” according to a Reuters reported this month.
          Jeff Clark, chief operating officer at Dell , this month said the price rises of components is “unprecedented.”
          “We have not seen costs move at the rate that we’ve seen,” Clark said on an earnings call, adding that the pressure is seen across various types of memory chips and storage hard drives.
          The unintended consequences The AI infrastructure players are using similar chips to those being used in consumer electronics. These are often some of the more advanced semiconductors on the market.
          But there are legacy chips which are manufactured by the same companies that the AI market is relying on. As these manufacturers shift attention to serving their AI customers, there could be unintended consequences for other industries.
          “For example, many other markets depend on the same underlying semiconductor manufacturing capabilities as the data center market” including automobiles, industrials and aerospace and defense, which “will likely see some impact from these price increases as well,” Hanbury said.

          Source: cnbc

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          OBR Complained to Treasury Before Budget About Leaks Spreading ‘Misconceptions’

          Warren Takunda

          Economic

          The Office for Budget Responsibility complained to senior Treasury officials in the run-up to the budget about a flurry of leaks that it said spread “misconceptions” about its forecasts, it has emerged.
          Prof David Miles of the OBR’s budget responsibility committee told MPs on the Treasury select committee on Tuesday that the watchdog had raised the issue of leaks with the department before the chancellor’s statement last week.
          “I think it was clear that there was lots of information appearing in the press which perhaps wouldn’t normally be out there and that this wasn’t from our point of view particularly helpful,” he said. He added: “We made it clear that they were not helpful and that we weren’t in a position of course to put them right.”
          Miles was appearing before the committee after the OBR chair, Richard Hughes, resigned on Monday, taking responsibility for the inadvertent release of its budget documents about an hour before Rachel Reeves stood up to announce her tax and spending plans.
          Hughes’s departure also followed the publication on Friday of a letter that took what he called the “unusual step” of spelling out the evolution of the OBR’s forecasts over time, prompting a furious row about Reeves’s account of the backdrop to her budget decisions.
          Miles said the letter was published because the watchdog felt the public had received a false impression, which was “damaging to the OBR and to the process”.
          However, he denied that, as opposition politicians have claimed, the OBR’s letter showed Reeves was misleading in her 4 November pre-budget speech, in which she underlined the perilous state of the public finances.
          He said the OBR’s forecasts “didn’t suggest that the fiscal outlook was problem free” and described the margin for error, or headroom, on the chancellor’s fiscal rules, which was £4.2bn in the 31 October forecast, as a “sliver”, and “wafer thin”.
          “I don’t think it was misleading for the chancellor to say that the fiscal position was very challenging,” he said.
          But Miles did highlight two “misconceptions” – the idea that the OBR had shifted the time period over which it assesses the yields on government bonds, perhaps under pressure from government; or that its forecasts had swung dramatically at the last minute, affecting Labour’s decision-making.
          Miles told MPs there was “a view that the OBR’s forecasts were wildly fluctuating in the process both leading up to the pre-measures forecast, and perhaps after it as well, and that that had made the budget process more chaotic than it otherwise would have been”.
          His evidence also flatly contradicted a government briefing on 14 November, as markets reacted to news that Reeves had dropped plans to raise income tax, which suggested that decision resulted from improved forecasts.
          “There seemed to be a misconception that there seemed to have been some good news, and I’m not sure where that came from: it didn’t exist,” he told the committee.
          “What had happened is that the forecast for headroom had gradually improved a little bit in the run-up to 31 October” (when the final ‘pre-measures’ forecast was sent to Reeves).
          Questioned by the Conservative former Treasury minister John Glen, Miles said the watchdog wanted to make clear that it was not “either the patsy that was doing what the government wanted, or that through its own fickle behaviour changing from one day to the next, depending on whether it was sunny or cloudy, that that was making it virtually impossible for the government”.
          As OBR officials were being questioned by MPs, the Bank of England governor, Andrew Bailey, was defending the institution against attacks.
          Speaking at a Bank press conference to launch its financial stability report, Bailey said: “The reason the OBR was created was to ensure there was a source of independent forecasting and an independent assessment of fiscal policy.”
          He added: “So attacks on the OBR in terms of the principle, I would say ‘no, can we please remember why it was done and the principles underlying it’.”
          Miles added that the slew of leaks may have hit economic growth by exaggerating consumer and business uncertainty, which “may well have been exacerbated by leaks which some days seemed to be suggesting one thing and the next day something different”. He added: “I don’t think that can have helped.”
          He defended the OBR’s decision to reassess its forecasts for the economy’s underlying productivity outlook this summer. Reeves and Keir Starmer have expressed frustration that this rethink, which led to a downgrade in growth forecasts, had not taken place earlier.
          Miles said it had been important to wait until the impact of the big economic shocks of Covid and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had faded, and it would have been “trigger-happy” to move earlier.

          Source: Theguardian

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Dollar Recovers Ground Vs Yen; Euro Steadies After Inflation Data

          Blue River

          Forex

          Economic

          The dollar regained ground against the yen, recovering from Monday's selloff, even as expectations for a December rate hike by the Bank of Japan lingered, while the euro edged up after data on Tuesday showed euro zone inflation was slightly hotter-than-expected.

          The greenback rose 0.3% against the yen to 156.00, after hitting a two-week low on Monday, following a sale of 10-year Japanese government bonds which saw the strongest demand since September.

          "The auction result appears to have provided a measure of reassurance to the market," said Shoki Omori, chief desk strategist at Mizuho in Tokyo.

          Stocks, bonds, cryptocurrencies and the dollar all tumbled on Monday after Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda said that the central bank would consider the "pros and cons" of raising interest rates at its next policy meeting, sending Japanese two-year yields above 1% for the first time since 2008 and prompting a spillover into global bond markets.

          "We're basically back to where we started before Ueda's remarks yesterday, which is maybe a bit perplexing considering that swaps still price about an 80% chance of a Dec hike," said Michael Brown, senior research strategist at Pepperstone.

          "To me it speaks to everything still being very much USD-driven, with the pressure on the buck seen yesterday amid increasing expectations that (Kevin) Hassett will get the Fed Chair gig having given way to slightly more rational conditions today, as participants re-focus on what remains a solid U.S. growth outlook, even with a 25-basis-point Fed cut next week very much on the cards," he said.

          Data on Monday showed weaker-than-expected manufacturing data from the U.S., heaping pressure on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates this month.

          Fed funds futures are pricing an 87% probability of a 25-basis-point cut at the Fed's next meeting on December 10, compared with a 63% chance a month ago, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool.

          The euro was 0.1% higher at $1.16200 after data showed inflation in the 20 nations sharing the euro accelerated to 2.2% last month from 2.1% in October, a small rise that is unlikely to be too concerning for the European Central Bank.

          Inflation in the euro zone is practically at the ECB's 2% target, ECB policymaker Joachim Nagel said in an interview published on Tuesday.

          "This (inflation data) comes at a time where some had claimed we could yet see another cut from the ECB, although the likeliness is that their easing cycle is over," said Joshua Mahony, chief market analyst at Scope Markets.

          Sterling edged 0.1% lower to $1.3207 , having touched its highest level in a month on Monday.

          The Bank of England cut the amount of capital it estimates lenders need to hold in a bid to boost lending and stimulate the economy in the first reduction to bank capital requirements since the financial crisis.

          Leading cryptocurrency bitcoin rose 2% to $88,255, pulling away from the 10-day low touched in the previous session.

          Source: Kitco

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2025 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          FastBull Membership

          Not yet

          Purchase

          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com