Battered dollar a boon for U.S. multinational companies

Forex

Summary:

The U.S. dollar’s sharp decline is set to boost multinational earnings by improving foreign profit conversion and export competitiveness. While helpful, broader trade and geopolitical risks may limit market impact.

Large U.S. multinationals should soon start showing the positive effects of the dollar's tumble in recent months, reversing the situation in the past few years when the greenback's strength hurt companies with significant foreign revenue.

The Dollar Index, which measures the buck's strength against six major currencies, is down about 10% for the year, due to rapidly changing U.S. trade policy and worries about U.S. growth and government debt.

About half of that drop happened since April 2, when U.S. President Donald Trump announced outsized import tariffs against trading partners that started a panic about investing in U.S. assets.

For the April-June period, the index, which is heavily weighted toward the euro, averaged 99.74, down 6.5% from the first quarter average, the largest such decline over consecutive quarters in more than 30 years. The effects of the dollar's slide are expected to start showing up in second-quarter earnings season just getting underway.

While that dollar's fall reflects investor worries about the U.S. economy's strength, it can help some companies. A weaker U.S. currency makes it cheaper for multinational companies to convert foreign profits into dollars, while also boosting the competitiveness of exporters' products.

"It's an absolutely huge move," Greg Boutle, head of U.S. equity & derivative strategy at BNP Paribas, said. "It is going to flatter earnings a little bit this quarter and also feed its way to guidance."

The dollar's impact on overall earnings is usually small, but can grow more meaningful when the currency experiences a large swing.

Every 10% drop in the dollar translates into a profit surprise of about 2%, at the S&P 500 level, according to estimates from research and strategy firm Macro Hive.

That would be welcomed by investors increasingly worried about the earnings impact of evolving trade and tariff policies. The second-quarter profit reporting season started this week.

"Whatever the beat, miss or forward guidance was going to be without the FX effect will obviously be a little bit better with it," Boutle said.

The dollar's weakness this year, after a 7% rise in 2024, which hurt corporate results last year, took many market watchers by surprise.

"Certainly a lot of companies came into the year assuming a headwind .... That's flipped. That's a positive for earnings," Patrick Kaser, portfolio manager at Brandywine Global, said.

While earnings growth is expected to decelerate from the first quarter, the weaker dollar could help to offset possible tariff effects.

Analysts are forecasting second-quarter earnings growth of 5.8% year-over-year compared with 13.7% in the first quarter, LSEG data show.

Even in the first quarter, the dollar was a drag on year-over-year S&P 500 earnings growth of about 1%, but now could lift earnings growth by about 0.5% in the second quarter, according to David Lefkowitz, head of U.S. equities at UBS Global Wealth Management.

"If the dollar stays at these levels, the boost on a year-over-year basis will get progressively larger," Lefkowitz said, estimating the dollar could generate a lift to year-over-year S&P 500 earnings growth by about 1% and 1.5% for the third and fourth quarter respectively.

FOREIGN EXPOSURE

S&P 500 companies generate about 41% of their revenue from outside the United States, according to FactSet.

Companies with major exposure to the Asia-Pacific region are particularly in focus with the euro having appreciated 12% against the buck while the yen is up about 6%.

However, not all index constituents are equally affected by the dollar's swings.

The information technology sector tops the list with the most international revenue exposure, at about 55%, followed by the materials and communication services sectors, at 52% and 49%, respectively, according to FactSet.

For instance, on Tuesday, BMO Capital Markets analyst Brian Pitz lifted his second-quarter revenue growth estimate for Netflix to 17.2% from 16.4%, largely boosted by a weaker dollar. Netflix will report results on Thursday.

Investors are divided on the impact of a weaker dollar on stock prices. Some, like UBS's Lefkowitz, believe any benefits are already priced in by Wall Street and will not significantly move markets during earnings reports, but others still anticipate a positive boost.

"A lot of buy-side investors are obviously very acutely aware of this already, but nevertheless, we do think it's not in sell-side consensus numbers," BNP's Boutle said.

"So we just think it creates a mechanical tailwind for earnings."

Still, analysts cautioned against counting on a big lift to stock prices from earnings beats driven by the weaker dollar.

Many companies, including chipmakers, which stand to benefit from a weaker dollar, are also the ones most vulnerable to a hit from tariffs, Macro Hive research analyst Viresh Kanabar said.

Investors may also be preoccupied with the potential impacts companies could see from the recent passage of the sweeping tax-cut and spending bill.

"In an environment where nothing else was going on, the move in the dollar would matter," Brandywine's Kaser said. "With all these other things going on, I don't think the currency effect is going to be as big as in an environment that maybe is quieter from a macroeconomic and geopolitical side of things."

Source: Reuters

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Thomas

Economic

Central Bank

Two-year U.S. Treasury yields tumbled in volatile trading on Wednesday but came off their lowest levels after President Donald Trump said he was not planning to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, refuting media reports that he planned to do so soon.

Two-year yields (US2YT=RR), which track interest rate expectations, fell to a roughly one-week low of 3.86% after CBS and Bloomberg reported that Trump had indicated to a group of House Republicans that he would fire Powell.

The yield was last 5.1 basis points lower at 3.906% (US2YT=RR).

The reports pushed rate cut bets starting in September to 66%, from 54% just before. After Trump said the reports were not true, that probability stood at 60%.

"I don't rule out anything, but I think it's highly unlikely unless (Powell) has to leave for fraud," Trump said, a reference to recent White House and Republican lawmaker criticism of cost overruns in the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's historic headquarters in Washington.

Investors sold off the long end of the Treasury curve, pushing 30-year yields to an eight-week high of 5.08%, before they eased back to 5.041% (US30YT=RR).

The benchmark 10-year yieldalso rose but was last down 1.2 bps on the day at 4.477%.

The yield curve steepened to its most since April, with the spread between two- and 10-year yields widening to as much as 61.8 bps. That reflects the sell-off at the long end amid fiscal worries and concerns about inflation going out of control if the Fed under a new chair cuts rates aggressively.

"This story keeps churning so understandably markets are nervous that it could happen sooner rather than later re Trump firing Powell," said Kenneth Broux, head of corporate research and rates, at Societe Generale in London.

"Bond and FX markets do not like the uncertainty. We've had stronger U.S. CPI goods ex-autos just yesterday, so to think that lower rates are the way forward as tariffs seep through consumer prices is not going to reassure."

Source: TradingView

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Economic

President Donald Trump's renewed calls for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's resignation have prompted investors to protect portfolios against the risk of higher inflation, as a central bank more willing to lower interest rates could fuel price rises and make lenders demand higher compensation to hold bonds.

While a Fed chief more friendly to cutting rates could be mixed for equities in the short term, it would translate into a weaker U.S. dollar, increased volatility in the Treasuries market and higher longer-term rates, meaning more expensive borrowing costs for mortgages and corporate bonds.

Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has repeatedly railed against the Powell-led Fed for not cutting interest rates, feeding concerns that Trump aims to put the Fed under his thumb.

Even JPMorgan (JPM.N) CEO Jamie Dimon on Tuesday warned of the unintended consequences of that, saying central bank independence was sacrosanct.

If market participants perceive that Fed independence is eroding, moves in financial assets could be wild, some analysts say. One of the top risks is that investors will sell Treasury bonds, lifting interest rates on longer-term maturities in the U.S. debt market relative to short-term securities.

"If markets believe that a politically-captured Fed will lower rates to stimulate growth regardless of economic consequences, long-term inflation expectations will rise, causing the curve to steepen," said Guy LeBas, chief fixed income strategist at asset manager Janney Capital Management.

"It's impossible to be confident in the magnitude of the move, but my guess is it'll be large - possibly measured in percent increases in 30-year Treasury yields, not basis points."

The minutes from the Fed's June 17-18 meeting, which were released last week, showed little support for a cut at the central bank's July 29-30 meeting, as most policymakers remain concerned about the inflationary risks that Trump's import tariffs could pose.

Even so, Trump has said Powell's resignation "would be a great thing." The president, who cannot fire the Fed chief over a monetary policy dispute, and his administration have publicly called for Powell's exit or for rates to be cut on multiple occasions this month.

"While short-dated yields could fall in this scenario based on a faster pace of Fed rate cuts moving forward, longer-dated yields would likely recalibrate higher for stickier inflation and rising term premia based on the erosion of institutional trust," said Chip Hughey, managing director of fixed income at Truist Advisory Services.

Bond investors are pricing in increased price pressures in the inflation market over the next few years. Breakeven inflation as indicated in the U.S. five-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities hit 2.476% late on Monday, a three-month high.

In a recent escalation of criticism of Powell, the White House is probing cost overruns in the renovation of the Fed's historic headquarters in Washington.

The questioning has intensified concerns among market participants over risks that the Trump administration will try to fire Powell for cause, perhaps the only legal path for it to do so. U.S. Treasury 30-year yields on Tuesday topped 5% for the first time since late May, as investors fretted about the country's huge fiscal deficit and assessed the risk of Powell's exit from the central bank.

A Fed spokesperson pointed to Powell's previous statements. The Fed chief, who was appointed by Trump during the president's first term in the White House, has repeatedly said he has no plans to leave his post as head of the U.S. central bank before his term expires on May 15, 2026. Powell's seat on the Fed's Board of Governors extends to January 31, 2028.

The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

"I still see the risks as fairly minimal, but higher than they were a week or two ago," said Matt Orton, head of market strategy at Raymond James Investment Management. Orton still favors a diversification away from Treasuries and into gold, as well as both high-quality value and growth equities. "The risk-reward for me in Treasuries right now just isn't there."

ON THE HUNT

While the odds of Powell being ousted or resigning are viewed as low, analysts see some chance that Trump could nominate someone for the job early to influence monetary policy through a "shadow" Fed chief.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier this month the Trump administration is focusing now on finding a replacement for Powell this fall.

Morgan Stanley said in a note that the risk of a shadow Fed chief is a less relevant question at this point.

"Until Powell's term is up, though, the bigger risk to our Fed forecast is our economic forecast ... where we remain quite humble," Seth Carpenter, Morgan Stanley's chief global economist, wrote.

Although market participants see the risk of weakening the central bank's independence as low, many investors are increasingly incorporating this prospect into their portfolios.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon pointed to those risks in an earnings call on Tuesday, saying: "The independence of the Fed is absolutely critical, and not just for the current Fed chairman, who I respect, Jay Powell, but for the next Fed chairman."

"Playing around with the Fed can often have adverse consequences, absolutely opposite of what you might be hoping for," Dimon added.

George Bory, chief investment strategist for fixed income at Allspring, said the asset manager has been positioning for steeper yield curves, in line with an environment of future rate cuts and growing budget deficits.

"That strategy of positioning for a steeper yield curve over the coming months and quarters seems to make a lot of sense. It's justified economically, the technicals support it, and then the political landscape also," he said.

If stocks could get a boost from lower rates initially, the pressure from higher long-term rates would cast a shadow over them, investors say.

Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Cresset Capital, said U.S. equities would "probably be OK, but I think that it would likely continue to accelerate the trend of global investors moving capital away from the U.S."

"Once investors question the independence of the Fed, it just becomes a less stable monetary environment," Ablin said.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Stocks

Tech Weakness Pulls Nasdaq and S&P 500 Lower While Dow Gains on Bank Strength

U.S. markets traded mixed in the first hour of Wednesday’s session as tech sector losses, led by ASML, weighed on the Nasdaq and S&P 500. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose about 0.3%, supported by bank earnings, while the Nasdaq slipped 0.1%. The S&P 500 held near flat, reflecting pressure from semiconductor names.

How Is ASML’s Outlook Hitting the Chip Sector?

Daily ASML Holding N.V.

ASML shares fell more than 6.5% after the company narrowed its 2025 revenue forecast and said it couldn’t confirm growth in 2026. That overshadowed a second-quarter beat on both top and bottom lines. The Dutch chip-equipment maker reported €7.7 billion in sales and €2.29 billion in profit, surpassing analyst estimates. However, its Q3 guidance of €7.4–€7.9 billion came in below the €8.3 billion consensus.

ASML attributed its caution to macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty, particularly the impact of tariffs. The reaction was swift: Marvell, Applied Materials, Lam Research, and Micron dropped between 3% and 5%, dragging down the broader tech space. The S&P tech sector dipped 0.2% early, capping broader market gains.

Can Strong Bank Earnings Keep the Dow Afloat?

Daily Goldman Sachs Group, Inc

Financials provided a cushion. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley beat earnings estimates, though the latter traded lower following its results. Bank of America also topped expectations but slipped slightly as net interest income missed forecasts.

The financial sector gained around 0.2%, bolstered by continued strength from JPMorgan, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo earlier this week.

These results help offset weakness elsewhere, with investors rewarding consistent revenue and capital return over top-line surprises alone.

Does the Latest Inflation Data Support a Rate Cut Narrative?

The June Producer Price Index came in flat month-over-month, undercutting expectations of a 0.2% rise. That followed softer-than-expected consumer inflation data earlier this week and reinforced market hopes for Federal Reserve easing later this year. Still, with inflation above target and labor markets tight, analysts remain divided on timing and size of any rate moves.

Volatility on Deck as Technical Signals Flash Red?

Nasdaq and S&P500: Tech Stocks Slide on ASML Warning, Dow Gains on Bank Strength_3

Daily Volatility S&P 500 Index

BTIG flagged a cautionary signal: the S&P 500’s streak of closes above its 20-day moving average often precedes sharp volatility spikes. With earnings season heating up and geopolitical headlines in focus, traders should expect wider price swings.

Market Outlook: Cautious Optimism With High Alert

Early action shows sector divergence—strength in banks, weakness in chips. With inflation cooling and Fed policy uncertain, traders should stay nimble.

Upcoming earnings from major tech names and more inflation data could drive decisive moves.

Volatility strategies and earnings-driven setups may offer the most attractive risk-reward in the current tape.

source :fxempire

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Devin

Economic

Central Bank

The dollar briefly tumbled on Wednesday and Treasury bond yields popped higher on reports citing an unidentified White House official that U.S. President Donald Trump is likely to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell soon, before Trump said he is not planning to do so.

Stocks also pared the mild losses that came off the original report from Bloomberg.

Sign up

Investors had been on edge for weeks about the prospect of Powell being removed from his job before his term ends next May, as Trump has repeatedly criticised him for not cutting U.S. rates quickly enough.

COMMENTS:

JAMIE COX, MANAGING PARTNER, HARRIS FINANCIAL GROUP, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA:

“The President would be making a mistake to fire Chair Powell. Federal Reserve independence is critical to money policy effectiveness, and the last thing the country needs is monetary policy by Presidential fiat. If the President messes with the Chairman, the Congress might use it as an excuse to step in to make changes to the Federal Reserve Act--none of these would be good for monetary policy integrity.”

CHRISTOPHER HODGE, CHIEF ECONOMIST FOR US, NATIXIS, NEW YORK:

“Much of Fed governance and process is informal, relying on norms and traditions, rather than statute. These norms have been developed over decades and have helped cement the Fed as a credible, trusted, and non-partisan institution that helps to smooth expectations volatility, rather than add to it.

"Maintaining the current traditions is the best route, but even if an alternative path is taken, there are likely sufficient guardrails to prevent a sustained and significant erosion of Fed credibility. If the new Chair is not viewed as credible and nonpartisan, there risks a serious split on FOMC decisions. In this light, selecting Waller as the replacement makes the most sense,”

KENNETH BROUX, HEAD OF CORPORATE RESEARCH FX AND RATES, SOCIETE GENERALE, LONDON:

"This story keeps churning so understandably markets are nervous that it could happen sooner rather than later re Trump firing Powell. Bond and FX markets do not like the uncertainty. We've had stronger U.S. CPI goods ex-autos just yesterday so to think that lower rates are the way forward as tariffs seep through consumer prices is not going to reassure. Hence long end USTs (US Treasuries)selling off versus the front end and the dollar is down."

JUAN PEREZ, SENIOR DIRECTOR OF TRADING, MONEX USA, WASHINGTON:

“Ultimately, what drives the U.S. dollar up in value against its peers, against everything is the idea that we have a financial system that's very centered around the U.S. dollar, and it is also a safe-haven asset.”

“What can kill the value of the U.S. dollar, what can absolutely destroy faith in the U.S. dollar, is attacking in any way, shape, or form the independence and authority of the Federal Reserve. Ultimately, when it comes to respecting and adhering to this concept of the U.S. dollar as a safe-haven asset in the midst of turbulence, that turbulence cannot affect or inflict pain when it comes to the greatest financial authority in the form of the Fed.

"But if politics, or if the White House, or if anybody can interfere with that, or wants to actively do so, that is absolutely a very, very negative thing for how the U.S. dollar is viewed, how the U.S. dollar is traded, and how people look at the dollar for the future.”

“In times of physical disturbance to the world, of geopolitical conflict, it makes sense to hold on to the U.S. dollar, but you're not going to hold on to the U.S. dollar if the one thing that makes it so solid, the Fed, is under attack. It really comes down to that.”

PAUL NOLTE, SENIOR WEALTH ADVISOR & MARKET STRATEGIST, MURPHY & SYLVEST, ELMHURST, ILLINOIS:

“(Trump’s) going to have to go through litigation in order to do it. He's just not going to be able to pink slip it like he did with different departments, the Department of Education or USAID or anything like that. So there is a process and to my knowledge, it has never happened before. So I'm not sure that it's going to be effective, other than to roil the market.”

“My understanding of the Federal Reserve and what can and can't be done – and this has been reviewed by others – is that this is not something he's going to be able to pull off and I'm not sure the Supreme Court is going to go along with it.”

“You’re now throwing up a lot of unknowns. Who's going to come in? What are they going to do? Will interest rates go down? Is that going to further inflation?”

“Powell has been steady. He's been consistent. Has he made mistakes? Yep. Everybody that's been in that position has. So I'm not sure that putting somebody new in there is going to fix all of those issues, but it does add an element of very much uncertainty to monetary policy.”

STEVE SOSNICK, CHIEF STRATEGIST, INTERACTIVE BROKERS, CONNECTICUT:

"Markets should be concerned about potential interference in the Fed's independence."

"Dollar plunging is what you'd expect. Short term rates getting hit going much lower is what you'd expect because whoever (Trump) put in would presumably be much more willing to cut rates.

"Stocks' reaction is a little muted because firstly traders remain loath to sell, they're just so programmed to try to buy dips that they're not eager to sell."

"Secondly because perhaps there are some traders who like the idea of lower rates more than more than the loss of independence."

RICK MECKLER, PARTNER, CHERRY LANE INVESTMENTS, A FAMILY INVESTMENT OFFICE, NEW VERNON, NEW JERSEY:

"It would be a big mistake on (Trump's) part if he is concerned about the markets and the dollar. An independent Fed gives balance between monetary and fiscal policy. I don't think that lowering rates here any small amount will really impact much about the economy. It might impact the debt interest payments but that's about it."

"One problem with this administration is they try and do an awful lot at the same time. And I don't know whether that's to try and get more things through rather than have a battle with Democrats over any one thing."

"But investors like orderly, carefully planned moves and this smacks of something that's just creating disorder and ramifications that I don't think the administration has completely thought out."

"It's a very unpredictable administration and that Trump in particular seems to take umbrage at the idea that he doesn't follow through on some of these things. So it wouldn't surprise me if they did (fire Powell). It wouldn't surprise me if they didn't. That's one of the problems in assessing investments under this administration is that there often is no clear path as to what's going to happen. And there's an awful lot of rhetoric that doesn't necessarily result in any specific action. So those are recipes for volatility but are not particularly good in terms of planning, either for corporate planning or for investment planning."

"It's very similar to the tariff situation. There's a lot of news that could be very meaningful, but no clear indication of whether it's going to come to fruition or not. So it just leaves a lot of investors confused, and many of them sitting on the sidelines trying to get a sense of where we're headed as a country financially."

MARCO VAILATI, HEAD OF RESEARCH AND INVESTMENTS, CASSA LOMBARDA, MILAN:

"It remains to be seen whether Trump will follow through on this threat. Such a move would almost certainly alarm the market, as it would call into question the Fed's independence from political authority. A less independent Fed, more beholden to this political leadership, would raise concerns — not so much about solvency, but about the very reliability of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency."

FRANCESCO PESOLE, FX STRATEGIST, ING, LONDON:

"If we get a headline today on Powell (removal), then we are looking at much more bigger sell-off in the dollar. Federal Reserve independence is the foundation the U.S.' status as the No.1 reserve currency."

"Given the implications of removing a Fed chair, the reaction is still relatively contained. Euro/dollar is at $1.17 and should be trading higher on this, because the implications are massive. Markets are still not fully pricing this all in. You would expect that if Powell is removed today, then the Fed cuts in September."

CHRIS BEAUCHAMP, CHIEF MARKET ANALYST, IG, LONDON:

"The news has put the dollar firmly on the back foot but has dragged stocks lower too. The Fed chairman’s departure would leave the independence of the central bank in question. It seems likely that his (Trump's) recent successes in passing his tax and spending bill, and the ceasefire in the Middle East, have emboldened the president to act."

"Now we will see if the bond market vigilantes will put the U.S. in their sights again. Such a dramatic move also suggests there is no backing down from tariffs this time around, especially with stocks at record highs."

LEE HARDMAN, SENIOR CURRENCY ANALYST, MUFG, LONDON:

"If that does happen (Trump fires Powell), it would be very damaging for investor confidence in the dollar, that’s why we’re starting to see the heavy selling, and it could extend further if he were to do so.

"It’s not clear-cut whether Trump has the power to fire Powell, so we would expect to see a legal challenge very quickly, but even if it were overruled, the hit to confidence would be long lasting, and it reinforces our bearish outlook on the dollar."

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Stocks

Large-cap tech stocks will likely soon be forced to meet the moment.

The do-or-die challenge for the tech bulls? A series of hot financial results and outlooks to match three months of hot stock price gains.

"I anticipate that the quality of earnings from these [large cap tech] companies will continue to be strong, but their ability to move their valuations to move higher and higher, completely unfettered, certainly is likely to be challenged here in the next couple of quarters," New York Life Investments chief markets strategist Lauren Goodwin said on Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid (watch above).

New York Life Investments has more than $800 billion in assets under management (AUM).

Goodwin cited cost challenges and trade uncertainty as risks to the sizzling tech trade headed into the second half of the year.

Unfettered tech valuations have been the modus operandi for the large-cap tech space of late.

High-profile tech names in Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL), Meta (META), Nvidia (NVDA), and Microsoft (MSFT) have advanced an average of 35% in the past three months, according to Yahoo Finance analysis. The top two performers are AI darlings Nvidia and Meta, which have logged respective gains of 52% and 41%.

The four giant tech stocks have an average forward price-to-earnings (PE) multiple of 30 times, well above the S&P 500's (^GSPC) 22 times. Meta, Nvidia, and Microsoft's forward PE multiples are above their three-year averages, while Alphabet's is slightly below.

Large-cap tech's strong rally extends beyond the household names in the "Magnificent Seven" complex.

For instance, Broadcom (AVGO) is up 57% in the past three months, pushing its valuation multiples to some of the highest levels in five years. The same situation extends to Uber (UBER) after a 25% stock price increase in the last three months.

Nowhere has the rush to drive up large-cap valuations been more evident than in Nvidia.

On Wednesday, the company's market cap stood at nearly $4.2 trillion amid enthusiasm about its AI chips flowing back into China soon.

"The AI Revolution is just hitting its next stage of growth," crowed tech analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush, epitomizing the enthusiasm in the space.

But others eyeing the tech trade are beginning to echo Goodwin's more measured tone when putting money to work at higher valuations.

"We note that the recent rally in large-cap tech and AI stocks has been fueled mainly by price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple expansion," Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, global head of Equities for UBS Financial Services, pointed out. "While we remain structurally bullish on AI, we would prefer to see further gains underpinned by upward earnings-per-share (EPS) revisions rather than valuation expansion alone."

She added, "Pockets of elevated valuations across leading AI companies, ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, and the upcoming second-quarter earnings season all point to the need for a balanced and selective approach. We recommend investors seek diversified exposure across semiconductors, software, and internet platforms, rather than concentrating risk in any single segment or individual stock."

Source : finance.yahoo

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Economic

Hours after President Donald Trump told a room full of Republican lawmakers that he will fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, he denied plans to do that.

“We’re not planning on doing it,” he said. “It’s highly unlikely.”

Trump on Tuesday met with Republican lawmakers and asked them if they thought he would fire Powell. After receiving support, the president said he would follow through, according to a senior White House official.

“The President asked lawmakers how they felt about firing the Fed Chair. They expressed approval for firing him. The President indicated he likely will soon,” said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly on the issue.

Separately, the New York Times reported that Trump has gone so far as to draft a letter for firing Powell and showed it to lawmakers during that meeting.

A Fed official declined comment to CNBC on the report about the Trump meeting Tuesday, which came after Republicans blocked a procedural vote on crypto legislation that the president favors.

Trump and other White House figures have launched a multi-pronged attack on Powell to push the central bank to lower its key borrowing rate. Most recently, they have blasted Powell over renovations to the Fed’s Washington headquarters, raising suspicion that Trump could try to remove the Fed leader for cause.

A recent Supreme Court decision indicated that the president does not have the authority to remove Fed officials at will.

In a CNBC interview Wednesday, Rep. French Hill, the chair of the House Financial Services Committee, repeated that “I don’t see” Trump firing Powell. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also told Bloomberg News on Tuesday that he didn’t expect Trump to move in that direction.

However, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican who on Tuesday joined with other party members in blocking the crypto initiative, said on social media site X that a move against Powell is forthcoming.

“Hearing Jerome Powell is getting fired! From a very serious source,” she said, later adding, “I’m 99% sure firing is imminent.”

In prior statements on the matter, Powell has said his firing is “not permitted under the law.” No president ever has attempted to so in the past, though others have criticized the central bank leader.

Trump nominated Powell for the chair in November 2018 to succeed Janet Yellen, who went on to become Treasury secretary under former President Joe Biden after holding the Fed position for four years. The Senate confirmed Powell the following February, but has been the subject of frequent criticism from Trump both during the president’s first term and the second.