• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Trending
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
BID
ASK
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6827.42
6827.42
6827.42
6899.86
6801.80
-73.58
-1.07%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
48458.04
48458.04
48458.04
48886.86
48334.10
-245.98
-0.51%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23195.16
23195.16
23195.16
23554.89
23094.51
-398.69
-1.69%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
97.950
98.030
97.950
98.500
97.950
-0.370
-0.38%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.17394
1.17409
1.17394
1.17496
1.17192
+0.00011
+ 0.01%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.33707
1.33732
1.33707
1.33997
1.33419
-0.00148
-0.11%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4299.39
4299.39
4299.39
4353.41
4257.10
+20.10
+ 0.47%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
57.233
57.485
57.233
58.011
56.969
-0.408
-0.71%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

USA Embassy In Lithuania: Maria Kalesnikava Is Not Going To Vilnius

Share

USA Embassy In Lithuania: Other Prisoners Are Being Sent From Belarus To Ukraine

Share

Ukraine President Zelenskiy: Five Ukrainians Released By Belarus In US-Brokered Deal

Share

USA Vilnius Embassy: USA Stands Ready For "Additional Engagement With Belarus That Advances USA Interests"

Share

USA Vilnius Embassy: Belarus, USA, Other Citizens Among The Prisoners Released Into Lithuania

Share

USA Vilnius Embassy: USA Will Continue Diplomatic Efforts To Free The Remaining Political Prisoners In Belarus

Share

USA Vilnius Embassy: Belarus Releases 123 Prisoners Following Meeting Of President Trump's Envoy Coale And Belarus President Lukashenko

Share

USA Vilnius Embassy: Masatoshi Nakanishi, Aliaksandr Syrytsa Are Among The Prisoners Released By Belarus

Share

USA Vilnius Embassy: Maria Kalesnikava And Viktor Babaryka Are Among The Prisoners Released By Belarus

Share

USA Vilnius Embassy: Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Ales Bialiatski Is Among The Prisoners Released By Belarus

Share

Belarusian Presidential Administration Telegram Channel: Lukashenko Has Pardoned 123 Prisoners As Part Of Deal With US

Share

Two Local Syrian Officials: Joint US-Syrian Military Patrol In Central Syria Came Under Fire From Unknown Assailants

Share

Israeli Military Says It Targeted 'Key Hamas Terrorist' In Gaza City

Share

Rwanda's Actions In Eastern Drc Are A Clear Violation Of Washington Accords Signed By President Trump - Secretary Of State Rubio

Share

Israeli Military Issues Evacuation Warning In Southern Lebanon Village Ahead Of Strike - Spokesperson On X

Share

Belarusian State Media Cites US Envoy Coale As Saying He Discussed Ukraine And Venezuela With Lukashenko

Share

Belarusian State Media Cites US Envoy Coale As Saying That US Removes Sanctions On Belarusian Potassium

Share

Thai Prime Minister: No Ceasefire Agreement With Cambodia

Share

US, Ukraine To Discuss Ceasefire In Berlin Ahead Of European Summit

Share

Incoming Czech Prime Minister Babis: Czech Republic Will Not Take On Guarantees For Ukraine Financing, European Commission Must Find Alternatives

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
U.K. Trade Balance Non-EU (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Trade Balance (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Services Index MoM

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Construction Output MoM (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Industrial Output YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Trade Balance (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Trade Balance EU (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Manufacturing Output YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. GDP MoM (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. GDP YoY (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Industrial Output MoM (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Construction Output YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

France HICP Final MoM (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Outstanding Loans Growth YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland M2 Money Supply YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland M0 Money Supply YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland M1 Money Supply YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India CPI YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Deposit Gowth YoY

A:--

F: --

P: --

Brazil Services Growth YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Mexico Industrial Output YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Russia Trade Balance (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Philadelphia Fed President Henry Paulson delivers a speech
Canada Building Permits MoM (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Wholesale Sales YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Wholesale Inventory MoM (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Wholesale Inventory YoY (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Wholesale Sales MoM (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany Current Account (Not SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Large Non-Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Small Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Large Non-Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Large Manufacturing Outlook Index (Q4)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Small Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Large Manufacturing Diffusion Index (Q4)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Tankan Large-Enterprise Capital Expenditure YoY (Q4)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Rightmove House Price Index YoY (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Industrial Output YoY (YTD) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Urban Area Unemployment Rate (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Saudi Arabia CPI YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Industrial Output YoY (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Industrial Output MoM (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Existing Home Sales MoM (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Total Reserve Assets (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Inflation Rate Expectations

--

F: --

P: --

Canada National Economic Confidence Index

--

F: --

P: --

Canada New Housing Starts (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Employment Index (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. NY Fed Manufacturing Index (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Core CPI YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing Unfilled Orders MoM (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing New Orders MoM (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Core CPI MoM (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing Inventory MoM (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI MoM (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada CPI YoY (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Core CPI MoM (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    Connecting
    .
    .
    .
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          ‘America First’ Showcases Trump’s Currency Confusion

          Winkelmann

          Economic

          Summary:

          Policy woes are made in the US, not abroad.

          US President Donald Trump has again demonstrated his confusion on currency issues with his ‘America first’ executive order on trade policy.
          Section 2a of the order shows this clearly: ‘The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the United States Trade Representative, shall investigate the causes of our country’s large and persistent annual trade deficits in goods, as well as the economic and national security implications and risks resulting from such deficits, and recommend appropriate measures, such as a global supplemental tariff or other policies, to remedy such deficits.’
          The US current account deficit is predominantly a macroeconomic phenomenon, reflecting the country’s savings and investment gap. America’s huge and unwise fiscal deficits, which Trump’s plans threaten to exacerbate, will add to that gap.
          The dollar is super strong. The US economy is stronger and the Federal Reserve’s interest rate cut path is far shallower than Europe’s, sucking in capital. Threatened tariffs are further pushing the dollar up, aggravating the current account deficit.
          Of course, given Europe’s weak growth and China’s massive headwinds, there clearly is a foreign dimension to the deficits. But first and foremost, American deficits are made in America. Foreigners can’t fix that.
          Trump assigns the investigation of persistent US deficits to the Commerce Department in consultation with the Treasury and US Trade Representative. But Commerce doesn’t have responsibility for macroeconomic policy. Nor does USTR. In contrast, the Secretary of the Treasury is the chief economic spokesperson for the administration. This order is therefore a slap in the face of the Treasury and Secretary Scott Bessent.

          Treasury and foreign exchange

          Section 2e of the order is more conventional, assigning responsibility solely to the Secretary of the Treasury: ‘The Secretary of the Treasury shall recommend appropriate measures to counter currency manipulation or misalignment that prevents effective balance of payments adjustments or that provides trading partners with an unfair competitive advantage in international trade, and shall identify any countries that he believes should be designated as currency manipulators.’

          But what should one watch out for?

          The standard currency playbook under Presidents Bill Clinton, George W Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden ran through the Treasury semi-annual foreign exchange report. Under a 2015-16 revision to the report’s authorisation, in assessing whether a country ‘manipulated’ its currency or pursued harmful currency practices, the Treasury was to analyse more quantitatively if the country: 1) was a major trading partner and had a large bilateral surplus with the US, 2) a material current account surplus and 3) was adding significantly to reserves in a sign it was artificially holding its currency down.
          Trump heavily focuses on the first point, though most economists largely dismiss the importance of bilateral balances. In 2019, Trump ordered the Treasury to designate China as a currency manipulator, even though China only ran afoul of one of the three criteria. Later it designated Vietnam and Switzerland for manipulation when they ran afoul of the three criteria.
          The designations in and of themselves were greeted by a yawn from markets and barely caused a ripple. Aside from China, which has only triggered the bilateral balance criterion in recent years, other countries running afoul of two criteria are placed on a monitoring list.

          What options are available to Treasury and the administration?

          The threat of being designated a manipulator and being on the monitoring list can prod smaller countries to hold bilateral discussions with the Treasury and make accommodations. But the kinds of remedies proposed in the legislation for manipulators are not that impactful. Cutting off Export-Import Bank financing may not be meaningful to China, for example. International Monetary Fund exchange rate analytics may offer interesting insights but, when it comes to ruthless truth-telling, the IMF is a toothless tiger.
          There is no reason a Trump Treasury needs to stick with its ‘three strikes’ practice from the first term, plus the criteria can be fiddled. For example, the material current account surplus criterion was defined as 3% under the Obama administration, 2% under Trump 1.0 and 3% under Biden.
          China’s current account surplus – regardless of what the IMF tells us – is probably back up to 3% or higher and the bilateral balance criterion is met. Two out of three might do the trick for a Bessent Treasury under a newly aggressive Trump administration. According to the November 2024 Treasury FX Report, Vietnam, Canada and Mexico are poor candidates for designation.
          Of course, Trump may impose tariffs against many countries for whatever reason, currency-related or not.
          For countries posing currency issues, it is worth recalling that countervailing duties for currency undervaluation were put forward towards the end of Trump 1.0 and imposed on Vietnamese tire production. The clock ran out before they could be imposed on Chinese products. Currency undervaluation CVDs could offer a targeted vehicle for Trump 2.0 to address currency concerns.
          They are, however, fundamentally misguided. There is no scientific way to estimate equilibrium exchange rates or deviations from equilibrium. Deriving a bilateral equilibrium exchange rate from a multilateral one is highly problematic. Currencies are impacted by capital flows, swamping current account flows — the dollar is especially affected by capital account transactions. These considerations involve macroeconomic policy. If the dollar is now overvalued, it is more a ‘Made in the USA’ story and the flip side of that is other currencies being undervalued, through little fault of their own.

          What are the possible outs?

          Under the Trans-Pacific Partnership during the Obama administration, tackling currency manipulation was a principal negotiating objective set by Congress for approval of Trade Promotion (fast track) Authority. Finance ministers reached a joint declaration that was not part of TPP or part of its dispute resolution, setting up possible finance minister discussions on macroeconomic and financial developments in the TPP.
          The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement included a currency chapter. It required the countries to affirm their commitment to market exchange rates and adhere to IMF prohibitions against manipulation.
          In both cases, though, the US push to tie currency understandings to trade deals met resistance from others. The provisions agreed were weak and often just recognised existing practice.
          Transparency on currency policy understandings featured prominently in Trump 1.0. The China Phase One deal had a currency chapter, which committed the parties to do what they were already doing. The trade deal with Korea included a side agreement. Vietnam was pushed to give such information to the US. Chinese currency practices in particular are highly opaque and there is still room for far greater improvements on this front. The progress on transparency was welcome.
          Any Trump 2.0 push on currency policy is likely to stir up a hornet’s nest within the administration, let alone internationally. But it will not change the underlying US macroeconomic dynamics driving imbalances. Foreign countries have engaged in harmful currency practices, but today’s woes are mainly made in the US. The Treasury’s immediate tools for tackling harmful currency practices are weak. If Trump 2.0 is to deploy currency sticks, countermeasures in the trade realm are the likeliest tool of choice.
          Blaming the foreigners will create some ugly recriminations and big US trade deficits aren’t going away.

          Sources:OMFIF

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Bank of Japan Hikes Interest Rates by 25BP as Markets Focus on Timing of Next Hike

          ING

          Forex

          Economic

          As widely expected, the BoJ raised its target rate to 0.5% . The surprise came from its latest inflation outlook, which was revised sharply higher throughout 2026. If the spring wage negotiations bring another solid wage increase, we expect the BoJ to deliver a 25 hike in May.

          The BoJ upgraded its inflation outlook to above 2% throughout the forecast period

          The BoJ's rate hike itself was already fully priced into the market, so it came as no surprise. But the Bank's latest quarterly outlook report sent a clearer message that further rate hikes would come sooner than the market had expected. The BoJ expects inflation to remain above 2% until FY2026. Governor Kazuo Ueda's communication at the press conference was rather ambiguous about the timing of the next rate hike and the terminal rate, but this was somewhat expected. Governor Ueda reiterated that the real interest rate remains negative, and monetary conditions therefore remain accommodative. Thus the market appears to be more closely following the projection of the sustainable inflation outlook.

          The BoJ upgraded its inflation outlook quite sharply

          Bank of Japan Hikes Interest Rates by 25BP as Markets Focus on Timing of Next Hike_1 Source: CEIC


          Solid wage growth underpins broad-based inflation gains

          The December inflation results are mostly in line with market consensus. Inflation jumped to 3.6% year-on-year in December (vs 2.9% in November, market consensus 3.4%) mainly due to a pick up in utilities (11.4%) and fresh food prices (17.3%). Higher utilities are mainly due to the end of the government subsidy programme. Rice prices continued to rise sharply which will lead to service prices (eating out) rising with a time lag, thus the BoJ should be watching the price trend carefully.

          Core inflation excluding fresh food also rose to 3.0% (vs 2.7% in November, 3.0% market consensus) while core-core inflation excluding fresh food and energy stayed at 2.4% (vs 2.4% in November, market consensus). In the monthly comparison, inflation growth accelerated to 0.6% month-on-month seasonally-adjusted (vs 0.4% in November) with goods and services up by 1.1% and 0.1% each. Apart from the end of energy subsidies and rising fresh food prices, service prices are rising steadily, which in our view is more important than the rise in headline inflation.

          Service prices rose steadily

          Bank of Japan Hikes Interest Rates by 25BP as Markets Focus on Timing of Next Hike_2 Source: CEIC

          BoJ watch

          Governor Ueda's comments made clear that the Bank is not in a hurry to raise rates again. But we noted that his optimistic view on the outlook for spring wage negotiations is a signal that a May hike option is on the table. For the May hike to materialise, Shunto's results would need to be as strong as last year's, which is our base case scenario.

          We expect inflation to cool down from January as the government renews its energy subsidy programme, but rising rice prices are likely to have a second-round effect in pushing up broader services prices.

          If another solid wage negotiation and steady rise in service prices are confirmed, we expect another 25bp hike in May.

          One of the major risk factors is President Trump's trade policy. So far Trump's trade policy has been mostly in line with market consensus and there has been no particular negative news for Japan. But, this may change in the future, and the BoJ's rate hike may be delayed.

          JPY: Positive news, but US yields remain the key driver

          As markets perceived the upward revision in inflation forecasts as a hawkish signal, there seems to be a bit more tailwind for the yen. Remember USD/JPY still has room to unwind extensive long positioning and the dollar has continued to lose momentum since Trump’s inauguration as the threat of imminent tariffs is decreasing.

          Two-year JPY swap rates have risen by only 3bp to 0.74% after the BoJ announcement, which signals there is more room for a hawkish repricing in the curve in the coming months if we are correct with our expectations for two more hikes in 2025. That bodes well for the yen, which however remains heavily dependent on the impact of Trump policies on US Treasury yields.

          Our rates team retains a bearish call UST which makes us reluctant to switch to a downward-sloping profile for USD/JPY just yet. That said, should upside room for US yields end up proving limited, the case for USD/JPY to move to the 155-150 range this year becomes quite compelling given the relatively hawkish BoJ and still significant medium-term overvaluation of the pair.

          Source: ING

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Global Companies Rush to Ship Goods to the U.S. Ahead of Looming Tariff Hikes

          Adam

          Economic

          Exporters Accelerate Shipments Amid Growing Trade Uncertainty

          International exporters are scrambling to move their goods into the U.S. in anticipation of potential tariff hikes under the new administration. With former President Donald Trump reaffirming his intent to impose sweeping tariffs on all imported goods, businesses across industries are taking preemptive action to mitigate the risks of rising trade barriers.
          Instead of adopting a wait-and-see approach, many multinational companies have expedited shipments to the U.S., ensuring they can secure current tariff rates before any new policies take effect. Key players in the automotive, food, and beverage industries—including General Motors, Mercedes, French cognac producers, Italian parmesan cheese manufacturers, and sparkling wine exporters—have all intensified their export activities. Additionally, U.S. importers have been stockpiling essential commodities such as steel, aluminum, and soybeans in response to potential supply disruptions.

          Strategic Stockpiling as Businesses Brace for Higher Costs

          Supply chain consultants note that companies are increasing inventory levels to shield themselves from future tariff shocks. According to Patrick Lepperhoff, CEO of supply chain consultancy firm Inverto, businesses have been aggressively stockpiling goods in the U.S. to maintain stable operations should higher tariffs disrupt trade. This strategy reflects concerns that a stricter trade policy could upend global supply chains and push companies to shift production into the U.S. rather than continuing to rely on international manufacturing hubs.
          A recent survey by Reuters found that corporate executives are acutely aware of the volatility in trade policy and its impact on business operations. The uncertainty surrounding future tariff measures has fueled fears that a prolonged trade war could severely alter global commerce, forcing companies to reconsider long-term sourcing and investment strategies.

          U.S. Trade Deficit Hits Record High Amid Import Surge

          The rush to import goods into the U.S. has contributed to a sharp increase in the country's trade deficit. In December 2024, the U.S. recorded a historic trade gap of $122 billion, driven by a 4% surge in imports and a 4.5% decline in exports. This imbalance highlights how businesses are frontloading shipments to bypass potential tariff hikes, leading to a short-term spike in inbound trade volumes.
          Retailers such as PacSun have taken proactive steps to navigate this volatile landscape. Brieane Olson, CEO of PacSun, revealed that the company has reallocated part of its projected Q1 2025 sales to emergency inventory reserves. Additionally, PacSun has established a "tariff task force" that meets twice a week to coordinate with suppliers and develop contingency plans.

          U.S. Prepares for Sweeping Tariff Increases on Key Trade Partners

          The Biden administration has reaffirmed its commitment to implementing tariffs of up to 25% on imports from Mexico and Canada, set to take effect on February 1. Trump has also signaled that additional tariff increases on Chinese goods are under consideration, with potential hikes being rolled out concurrently.
          Even more concerning for the automotive sector, Trump has threatened to impose tariffs ranging from 100% to 200% on vehicles imported from Mexico. Such a move could severely disrupt global automakers with manufacturing operations in Mexico, forcing them to reassess their supply chain strategies and potentially relocate production to the U.S.

          Implications for Global Trade and Supply Chain Resilience

          The escalating trade tensions underscore the fragility of international commerce and the far-reaching consequences of protectionist policies. In 2024, the U.S. imported approximately $844 billion worth of goods from Canada and Mexico, accounting for nearly 28% of total imports. A significant portion of this trade now faces the risk of higher duties, which could lead to increased consumer prices, supply chain disruptions, and shifting investment patterns.
          As global businesses brace for a new era of trade policy uncertainty, companies must navigate an increasingly complex landscape by diversifying sourcing strategies, securing alternative supply chains, and reevaluating long-term investment plans. While stockpiling may offer short-term relief, the broader implications of these policy shifts will likely shape global trade patterns for years to come.

          Source: Manufacturing Today

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Korean Economy Logs Weaker-Than-Expected Growth in 2024; Q4 Growth Misses Forecast

          Glendon

          Economic

          Forex

          The Korean economy posted weaker-than-expected growth last year amid slowing export growth, sagging domestic demand and a political crisis.

          The economic expansion in the fourth quarter also came far below the earlier forecast by the Bank of Korea (BOK) as political turmoil sparked by President Yoon Suk Yeol's shocking martial law declaration dented private spending and investment, according to the central bank.

          The country's real gross domestic product — a key measure of economic growth — increased 2 percent in 2024, according to preliminary data from the BOK.

          The 2024 figure was lower than the central bank's forecast of a 2.2 percent expansion, though the growth accelerated from a 1.4 percent advance in 2023.

          Last year's growth was led by exports, which surged 6.9 percent from a year earlier, compared with a 3.5 percent on-year increase in 2023.

          Private spending rose 1.1 percent in 2024, slower than a 1.8 percent growth the previous year.

          Facility investment gained 1.8 percent, while construction investment fell 2.7 percent.

          In the fourth quarter alone, Asia's fourth-largest economy advanced 0.1 percent on-quarter, far lower than the BOK's forecast of a 0.4 percent growth.

          On a yearly basis, the economy grew 1.2 percent in the fourth quarter, slowing from the previous quarter's 1.5 percent gain.

          Exports inched up 0.3 percent from three months earlier in the fourth quarter, while imports shed 0.1 percent.

          Private consumption added 0.2 percent on-quarter, and government spending rose 0.5 percent. Facility investment also climbed 1.6 percent.

          But construction investment dropped 3.2 percent, the data showed.

          "Heightened political uncertainties affected consumer sentiment and private spending. The situation of the construction industry was worse than expected," BOK official Shin Seung-cheol told a press briefing.

          Yoon declared a shocking martial law on Dec. 3, and the National Assembly voted to impeach him.

          Yoon was arrested earlier this month and has come under investigation on charges of leading an insurrection and committing abuse of power.

          Korea had been on an economic recovery track at the beginning of 2024, but momentum has weakened as the growth of exports has slowed and domestic demand remained in the doldrums.

          The economy expanded 1.3 percent from three months earlier in the first quarter but contracted 0.2 percent in the second quarter before barely growing 0.1 percent in the third quarter.

          The BOK earlier presented a 1.9 percent growth outlook for the Korean economy in 2025, which is widely expected to be lowered further.

          "Weak domestic demand and the construction industry slump are expected to continue through the first quarter of this year," Shin said, citing a potential extra budget and policy changes under the new Donald Trump administration as major factors that will affect the economy down the road. (Yonhap)

          Source: Koreatimes

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Hawkish Hold From The Fed To Test Trump’s Patience

          ING

          Central Bank

          Economic

          Fed holds rates steady at 4.25-4.5%

          No surprises from the Federal Reserve at today’s FOMC meeting with a unanimous decision to leave the Fed funds target range at 4.25-4.5%. After 100bp of cuts through the final four months of 2024 the Fed had already signalled a desire to take time to evaluate the impact of their actions and to also gain greater clarity on how President Trump’s policy thrust may impact the economy.

          That said, within the accompanying statement there is a hawkish shift in language that suggests we need to see an unambiguous softening in the data for them to deliver further interest rate cuts. It repeats that economic expansion remains “solid”, but they have removed the comment that inflation has “made progress” towards the 2% target, saying merely that “inflation remains somewhat elevated” – although in the press conference Chair Powell downplayed the significance of this. They also state that unemployment has “stabilised” with labour market conditions “solid”. In December they said that labour market conditions had “generally eased”.

          Fed funds target rate and market expectations

          Source: Macrobond, Bloomberg, ING

          President Trump wants lower interest rates

          The Fed will no doubt be braced for criticism from President Trump who told last week’s Davos World Economic Forum that “with oil prices going down, I'll demand that interest rates drop immediately, and likewise they should be dropping all over the world”. The Fed under Jay Powell, whose term expires next year, will only acquiesce if to do so would be consistent with their mandate. Their December forecasts do indicate an inclination to cut interest rates – they are projecting two cuts this year – but their concern is likely to be that Donald Trump’s policy thrust of tax cuts and less regulation should be growth supportive while tariffs and immigration controls are likely to be somewhat inflationary. With tomorrow’s GDP data expected to show the economy grew 2.8% last year and with unemployment a little above 4% and core inflation lingering around 3% the Fed are likely to pause here for a number of months. This was confirmed by Chair Powell in the press conference when he said "we do not need to be in a hurry to adjust out policy stance".

          Slower and more gradual moves from the Fed

          Our forecast had been three Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2025 – March, June and September – but this was heavily dependent on President Trump’s enacted policies as well as the evolution of data. We remain optimistic on a further moderation in annual inflation rates in the months ahead, helped by slowing housing cost increases. We also anticipate that next month’s payrolls benchmark revisions will indicate a much weaker job creation path than initially reported. However, with Donald Trump threatening 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada and 10% on China from this weekend the narrative could rapidly change – indeed Powell admits "we don't know what will happen with tariffs, with immigration, with fiscal policy, with regulatory policy". But in an environment of renewed Fed wariness we are leaning in the direction of a slower rate cutting path of two 25bp rate cuts in the second half of 2025 with a further 25bp cut in early 2026 while acknowledging that the range of possible outcomes is, if anything, widening.

          Treasuries eye issues with rate cut ambition, while QT end not made an issue just yet

          It’s clear that inflation is still an issue at the Fed. Not as severe as it was, but let’s say, not a fully resolved issue. Treasuries have had the same view over recent months. This is a 3% inflation economy, and therein lies the genesis of the funds rate not getting back down to neutral (3%) and the 10yr Treasury yield remaining above 4.5%. The impulse reaction for Treasuries is negative due to this. We’re not fully convinced this is the beginning of resumed bear market just yet, as we have the PCE inflation report this week. The worry will be that the Fed has seen it, and maybe is not thrilled by it. If so, that’s not great for Treasuries.

          On the likely end to QT by mid year (our view), the short FOMC statement chose not to mention it. Maybe not big for them now. But they certainly must have talked about it. The issue here is excess liquidity (which we define as bank reserves plus reverse repo balances). It is likely to hit levels that the Fed would prefer not to go below from the middle of 2025 onwards, partly depending on how the debt ceiling saga evolves. The key number here is US$3tn for bank reserves, representing about 10% of GDP. We are currently at US$3.3tn. However, with QT running at US$60bn per month, ongoing QT would bring reserves down in net terms. The Fed will want to end QT before things get overly tight.

          But clearly the Fed did not want to make a big deal on the end of QT, as it will end. Rather the "no change" outcome is smothered by inflation stubbornness, although in the end smoothed over by another ever-calm Chair Powell performance.

          Dollar gets a brief lift

          A mildly hawkish FOMC statement has seen the dollar take its cue from the USD rates market and edge a little higher. This in no way compares to December’s big shift in Fed communication and projections which helped propel the DXY dollar index to a high of 110 in early January. And in fact, those modest dollar gains have proved fleeting today.

          Instead, the FX market will probably take a little more interest in Friday’s release of the December core PCE inflation release and a lot more interest in whether the weekend sees the Trump administration follow-through on threats to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China.

          In particular, in its Monetary Policy Report released today, the Bank of Canada has tried to model the impact of a 25% US tariff on all Canadian goods and retaliatory Canadian tariffs by the same amount. The conclusion is that Canadian growth would be 2.5% below baseline forecasts in Year 1, while the inflationary impact would see CPI being a full 1% above baseline forecasts by Year 3.

          Importantly, a separate research article in that publication estimates that of the 7% rise in USD/CAD since October, 6% of that rise has been driven by a risk premium. In other words, and we agree, the threat of tariffs has been a major driver of FX rates and that will probably be the case as FX markets await trade developments this weekend. And if not this weekend, uncertainty around findings of a major US trade review in April looks likely to keep the dollar bid over coming months.

          In short, tariffs and not rate differentials are the major FX driver now. But a slightly hawkish Fed can only help a market currently positioned overweight the dollar.

          Source: ING

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Kremlin Rejects BRICS Currency Plans Amid U.S. Trade Threats

          Adam

          Economic

          Political

          Russia Dismisses Speculation on BRICS Creating a Unified Currency

          On January 31, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov firmly stated that BRICS has no plans to introduce a common currency, countering recent speculation and political rhetoric. Peskov clarified that the bloc, which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, has been primarily focused on strengthening joint investment platforms rather than launching a new monetary unit. This assertion came after renewed pressure from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who warned of severe economic consequences if BRICS were to move forward with an alternative to the U.S. dollar.
          Peskov emphasized that discussions within BRICS have not revolved around replacing the dollar but rather about fostering economic cooperation through investment mechanisms. He also suggested that U.S. officials should ensure Trump receives accurate information about BRICS' actual agenda, implying that misconceptions about the bloc’s financial strategy have fueled unnecessary tensions.

          Trump Threatens 100% Tariffs in Response to De-Dollarization Fears

          Just a day before the Kremlin’s response, Trump issued a strong warning to BRICS nations, cautioning against any attempt to undermine the dominance of the U.S. dollar. In a post on Truth Social, Trump reiterated his stance that any country involved in launching a new BRICS currency or supporting an alternative reserve currency would face immediate trade penalties. Specifically, he vowed to impose a 100% tariff on imports from BRICS members, echoing similar warnings he had made in the weeks following his victory in the November 2024 presidential election.
          Trump's statement reflects growing concern within the U.S. over global de-dollarization efforts. In recent years, several BRICS nations have explored ways to settle trade in local currencies, reducing reliance on the dollar in international transactions. However, Peskov's remarks suggest that while BRICS has been working on strengthening economic ties, it has not committed to the drastic step of establishing a unified currency.

          Economic and Political Implications of the BRICS-U.S. Tensions

          The dispute over a potential BRICS currency is part of a broader geopolitical struggle concerning global financial influence. While BRICS countries have sought to reduce dependency on Western-controlled financial institutions, the absence of an official plan for a single currency indicates that economic diversification remains a long-term ambition rather than an immediate reality.
          Trump's aggressive response highlights Washington's sensitivity to any movement that could challenge the dollar's reserve currency status. His proposed tariff strategy underscores the potential economic ramifications for BRICS members if they proceed with de-dollarization efforts. Meanwhile, Russia’s insistence that BRICS is prioritizing investment platforms rather than currency reform signals an attempt to maintain stability in global economic relations while navigating increasing tensions with the U.S.
          The evolving dynamic between BRICS and the U.S. reflects deeper shifts in global economic power. Whether or not BRICS eventually takes steps toward a new monetary system, the political and financial stakes surrounding dollar alternatives remain high. The Kremlin’s dismissal of currency discussions may be an attempt to defuse immediate tensions, but the broader debate over global financial rebalancing is far from over.

          Source: The Economic Times

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Japanese Yen Poised for Best January Performance in Seven Years Amid BoJ Rate Hike Expectations

          Adam

          Forex

          Yen Strengthens on BoJ Policy Shift Signals

          The yen’s recent appreciation is closely tied to hawkish expectations surrounding the BoJ’s monetary policy. At the latest market close, the yen stood at 154.19 JPY/USD, marking a gradual strengthening trend.
          On January 30, BoJ Deputy Governor Ryozo Himino stated that the central bank would proceed with interest rate hikes if economic activity and inflation follow its projections. This statement reassured investors that Japan’s era of ultra-loose monetary policy is coming to an end, adding momentum to the yen’s rise.
          Inflation data released on January 31 further reinforced the tightening outlook, with Tokyo’s core inflation rising 2.5% year-over-year, the fastest pace in nearly a year. This solidifies market expectations that BoJ could implement another rate hike in 2025, further supporting the yen’s appreciation.
          According to Jane Foley, Senior FX Strategist at Rabobank, the USD/JPY exchange rate is projected to reach 145 JPY/USD by the end of the year, as the market grows more confident in the BoJ’s policy stance.

          Global Currency Market Reactions and USD Strength

          Outside Japan, currency markets remain volatile due to shifting monetary policies and trade concerns:
          The U.S. dollar index (DXY) inched up by 0.1% to 108.18, following slower but steady U.S. GDP growth in Q4 2024.
          The Federal Reserve (Fed) kept its benchmark interest rate at 4.25%-4.5% on January 29 and signaled no rate hikes at least until June 2025.
          The euro (EUR) fell to 1.0392 EUR/USD, marking a 0.9% weekly decline, after the European Central Bank (ECB) cut interest rates by 25 basis points and hinted at further easing in March.
          The British pound (GBP) dropped 0.7% this month, trading at 1.2423 GBP/USD, as traders anticipate a potential rate cut from the Bank of England (BoE) next week.

          North American Trade Tensions and Currency Pressure

          Meanwhile, Mexico’s peso (MXN) and Canada’s dollar (CAD) face downside risks ahead of U.S. tariff measures set to take effect on February 1. President Donald Trump has threatened a 25% tariff on imports from Mexico and Canada, fueling market uncertainty.
          The Mexican peso rebounded to 20.6849 MXN/USD after earlier losses but is still on track for its worst weekly performance since October 2024, with a 2% decline.The Canadian dollar remains under pressure, as concerns grow that U.S. trade policy could accelerate inflation and weaken Canada’s economic outlook.

          Yen Outlook Remains Strong as BoJ Stands Apart from Global Easing Trend

          The Japanese yen’s strong start to 2024 reflects rising market confidence in BoJ’s shift away from negative interest rates, contrasting with the Fed, ECB, and BoE, which are expected to either hold or cut rates in the coming months.
          With strong inflation data and firm policy signals from the BoJ, expectations for further yen appreciation remain intact. However, U.S. trade policy uncertainties and broader economic developments could still introduce volatility, making BoJ’s next policy moves crucial for determining the yen’s trajectory in 2025.

          Source: The Economic Times

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2025 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          FastBull Membership

          Not yet

          Purchase

          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com