US Crude Oil Inventories Surge, Surpassing Forecasts And Previous Levels

Economic

Commodity

Summary:

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) released its weekly report on Crude Oil Inventories, a key indicator of the number of barrels of commercial crude oil held by US firms. The report showed a significant increase in crude oil inventories, defying expectations and surpassing previous levels.

The actual number of barrels reported by the EIA reached 7.070 million, a figure that exceeded both the forecasted and previous numbers. The forecast had predicted a decrease of 1.700 million barrels, making the actual figure a substantial deviation from expectations.

This upswing in crude oil inventories also represents a significant contrast to the previous data. The prior week’s report showed 3.845 million barrels, meaning the current figure nearly doubled the amount of crude oil held by US firms.

The level of inventories plays a crucial role in influencing the price of petroleum products, which in turn can have an impact on inflation. This unexpected increase in crude inventories implies weaker demand, which is bearish for crude prices.

A higher than expected increase in inventories can be interpreted as a sign of weaker demand, which could lead to a fall in crude prices. On the other hand, if the increase in crude is less than expected, it implies greater demand and is bullish for crude prices.

The EIA’s Crude Oil Inventories report is one of the most closely watched indicators by investors and analysts in the energy market, due to its potential to influence not only energy prices but also broader financial markets and the economy.

This unexpected surge in US crude oil inventories will be a key factor for investors and analysts to monitor in the coming weeks, as it could potentially signal shifts in the energy market and broader economic trends.

Source: Investing

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Warren Takunda

Economic

China–U.S. Trade War

US President Donald Trump has ramped up threats to impose punishing tariffs on more than a dozen nations unless they can broker a deal before 1 August, marking the latest phase in his trade war.

The tax duties stem from Trump’s so-called “reciprocal” tariff package that was first announced in April, but then delayed for 90 days to allow for negotiations. That deadline, initially scheduled to end this week, has now been pushed back to August.

The shifting timeline of the most significant US tariff increases in nearly a century has roiled global markets and caused widespread confusion, with the US administration far off from sealing the “90 deals in 90 days” it had initially promised.

If you are perplexed by Trump’s tariffs here is the latest.

What has changed with Trump’s tariff rollout?

Trump informed powerhouse suppliers Japan, South Korea and 12 other nations at the start of this week that they will face tariffs of at least 25% starting from August unless they can quickly negotiate deals.

He also threatened to increase them if any countries retaliate, or tried to circumvent tariffs by sending goods through other nations.

Trump has kept much of the world guessing on the outcome of months of talks with countries hoping to avoid the hefty tariff hikes he has threatened.

The rate for South Korea is the same as Trump initially announced, while the rate for Japan is one percentage point higher than that announced in April.

Which countries are affected?

Fourteen countries have been given notice this week of the looming tariffs increase, with more expected to follow in the coming days.

The steep tariff rates range from 25-40% with some of the harshest levies imposed on developing nations in southeast Asia, including 32% for Indonesia, 36% for Cambodia and Thailand and 40% on Laos, and Myanmar, a country riven by years of civil war.

Manufacturing hub Bangladesh faces 35%, while Tunisia, Malaysia, Kazakhstan, South Africa and Bosnia and Herzegovina have been slapped with a 30% tariff unless they can reach a deal.

How many deals have been made?

Trump granted a 90-day pause this April to allow for time to broker trade deals, but only two deals have been reached.

The first deal with the UK, signed on 8 May, includes a 10% of most UK goods, including cars, and zero tariffs for steel and aluminium. A second deal was reached with Vietnam last week that sets a 20% tariff for much of its exports, although the full details are unclear, with no text released.

Relations with China, after escalating into a major trade war, have reached a delicate truce.

US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said he expected several trade announcements in the next 48 hours, adding that his inbox was full of last-ditch offers from affected nations.

South Korea’s president convened an emergency meeting and its trade ministry said the country would use the extended deadline to negotiate “mutually beneficial results”. The EU reportedly aims to reach a trade deal by Wednesday.

Meanwhile other nations such as South Africa have hit back, with the country’s president Cyril Ramaphosa saying the 30% US tariff rate was unjustified given that 77% of US goods enter South Africa with zero tariffs.

How are markets and business reacting?

US stocks have fallen in response, the latest market turmoil as Trump’s trade moves have roiled financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to protect their economies.

The S&P 500 closed down about 0.8%, its biggest drop in three weeks. US-listed shares of Japanese automotive companies fell, with Toyota Motor closing down 4% and Honda Motor off by 3.9%.

The US dollar has had its worst first half-year in more than 50 years.

“Tariff talk has sucked the wind out of the sails of the market,” Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth Management, told Reuters.

Why have Asian countries been hit so hard?

Countries in Asia have been hit with some of the most punitive tariffs due to what Trump claims is their unfair trade deficits – meaning they export more to the US than they import.

However, analysts have questions the merit of using these calculations and also suggested that Trump may instead be trying to punish China, by targeting countries that receive substantial investment from the world’s second-largest economy.

Several nations in Southeast Asia, a region that accounted for 7.2% of global GDP in 2024, are also major manufacturing hubs for goods such as textiles and footwear, meaning they will be severely affected by tariffs, while conversely prices for such goods will also rise in the US.

What happens next?

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told a press briefing this week that more countries would be informed of looming tariffs this week.

Trump was “close” on other deals, she added, but “wants to ensure these are the best deals possible”.

However, the minimal progress on deals to date highlights what trade experts say is the reality of trade agreements – that they are time-consuming and complicated.

Source: Theguardian

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Economic

U.S. companies are getting ready to open their books on the second quarter, with investors looking for signs of an impact from President Donald Trump's trade war launched on April 2.

While earnings growth is expected to decelerate from the first three months of the year, a sharp decline in the dollar could help to offset possible tariff effects.

Analysts are forecasting second-quarter growth of 5.8% year-over-year compared with 13.7% in the first quarter, LSEG data show. JPMorgan Chase and other big banks are due to report results on July 15, unofficially kicking off the reporting period.

The S&P 500 index has returned to all-time highs, raising questions again on whether profit growth will be enough to support stocks at higher prices.

The index is trading at a multiple of about 22 times forward earnings, compared with a 10-year average price-to-earnings ratio of roughly 18, based on LSEG data.

Trump broadened his global trade war on Tuesday, announcing plans to impose a 50% tariff on imported copper, and said long-threatened levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals were coming soon.

On Monday, Trump told 14 nations including Japan and South Korea that they now face sharply higher tariffs from a new deadline of August 1.

Countries have been under pressure to conclude deals with the U.S. since Trump unleashed the trade war, causing a sharp selloff in stocks. Only two deals have been struck so far, with Britain and Vietnam. In June, Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework covering tariff rates.

With the first-quarter earnings season, "it was kind of like, we really don't know what to expect. There were a lot less companies pulling guidance than anticipated, and it showed companies were still relatively resilient," said Keith Lerner, chief market strategist at Truist Advisory Services in Atlanta.

"The question was, maybe they're resilient because we haven't really seen the impact."

Tariffs are expected to increase prices and slow down growth, though uncertainty over the ultimate policies has also been a drag since it leads businesses to postpone decisions.

While trade negotiations are still under way, tariffs will likely again be a topic on many company conference calls, said Peter Tuz, president of Chase Investment Counsel in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Higher tariffs have yet to weigh on sales forecasts or corporate spending plans at the aggregate index level, David Kostin, Goldman Sachs' chief U.S. equity strategist and his team wrote.

However, they cited risks to some corporate margins, if companies are forced to absorb tariff costs. Goldman Sachs economists expect consumers to absorb 70% of the direct cost.

Second-quarter earnings growth forecasts have stabilized in recent weeks after falling sharply in early April.

The initial negative earnings revisions followed Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcements in April, while expectations for tariff-exposed sectors such as autos, transportation and consumer durables remain steeply below April levels, Sean Simonds and other equity strategists at UBS wrote in a note.

Over the last three months, the estimated second-quarter earnings growth rate declined 4.4 percentage points, compared with the prior three-year average drop of 3.5 points, according to Tajinder Dhillon, senior research analyst at LSEG Data & Analytics.

Strategists say that is not necessarily a negative, since most S&P 500 companies typically beat analysts' earnings estimates and lower expectations can mean a lower bar to beat.

"Expectations are sufficiently low for many S&P 500 companies to show much better-than-expected Q2 earnings growth," Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek wrote in a recent note.

That the S&P 500 has recently hit a record high "says that the market sees things the same way," he wrote.

He and others see a possible benefit to earnings from the U.S. dollar's weakness, which makes U.S. goods less expensive overseas.

The dollar index , which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies, fell about 7% in the second quarter. It is down about 10% year to date and had the biggest drop over the first six months of any year since 1973.

"A lot of the big Fortune 500 companies do half their business overseas, so it might be a source of positive surprises for some companies, and maybe enough to offset what they might say about the tariffs going forward," Tuz said.

Technology shares rebounded sharply in the second quarter, rising 23.5% after falling in the first quarter. Communication services also rebounded in the second quarter.

The two sectors are expected to have had the biggest earnings growth from a year ago in the second quarter, with technology earnings seen up 17.7% from a year ago and communication services up 31.8%, based on LSEG data.

Optimism about artificial intelligence remains high. Last week, the market value of Nvidia, the leading designer of high-end AI chips, neared $4 trillion, briefly putting it on track to become the most valuable company in history.

"You need the big names, the megacaps to not disappoint in a big way," said Robert Pavlik, senior portfolio manager at Dakota Wealth in Fairfield, Connecticut.

source : reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Michelle

Economic

Forex

President Donald Trump signaled he would send more letters Wednesday dictating new U.S. tariff rates on a slew of countries' imports, leaning into his aggressive approach to resetting America's global trade relationships.

The Trump administration "will be releasing a minimum of 7 Countries having to do with trade, tomorrow morning," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Tuesday evening.

An "additional number of Countries" will be "released" Wednesday afternoon, he wrote.

While the wording of Trump's post was unclear, he appeared to be suggesting that he will repeat his actions from Monday, when he shared screenshots of letters telling 14 countries' leaders that their exports to the U.S. would face steep new tariffs starting Aug. 1.

The nearly identical two-page letters signed by Trump were sent to Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Laos, Myanmar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Tunisia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Serbia, Cambodia and Thailand.

The rates for each country range from 25% to 40%. The letters note that the U.S. will "perhaps" consider adjusting the new tariff levels, "depending on our relationship with your Country."

Many of those rates are close to what Trump had imposed as part of his "liberation day" tariff rollout on April 2, which set a 10% baseline levy for nearly all countries on earth and slapped much higher duties on dozens of individual nations.

That announcement sparked a week of turmoil in global trading markets, which only ended when Trump abruptly said he would pause those higher rates for 90 days.

That reprieve was set to expire Wednesday. But on Monday, Trump signed an executive order delaying the tariff deadline until Aug. 1.

In another post earlier Tuesday, Trump asserted that "there will be no change" to the August start date.

"No extensions will be granted," he said.

Source: CNBC

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Economic

As President Donald Trump’s tariffs against more than a dozen countries spark fresh concerns about looming country-specific trade measures, often overlooked are the levies on specific products and commodities that are already in place or could soon be coming.

These so-called “Section 232” tariffs — already announced on cars, steel and aluminum, and floated for copper and other items — further constrain businesses and U.S. trading partners trying to navigate a constantly evolving trade environment.

Trump said Tuesday that he would impose 50% tariffs on copper imports, double what he had previously floated for the valuable commodity. He also said he would soon announce tariffs “at a very high rate” on pharmaceuticals.

Trump’s announcement sent copper prices soaring, and the metal posted its highest single-day gain since 1989. The copper futures contract for September closed Tuesday up 13%, at $5.6855 per pound.

The threats were the latest sign of the president’s willingness to use sector-specific tariffs to gain leverage over trading partners and try to reshape the U.S. economy.

The announcement came a day after Trump rolled out stiff tariff rates on imports from 14 countries, all effective Aug. 1: Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Laos, Myanmar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Tunisia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Serbia, Cambodia and Thailand.

The letters are intended to ratchet up the pressure on U.S. trade partners to come to the table before the Aug. 1 deadline.

But as countries’ negotiations are still in limbo — and some nations are still pushing for carve-outs, with varying degrees of receptiveness from the White House — sector-specific tariff rates are already squeezing trading partners and U.S. consumers.

South Africa and Kazakhstan, two countries that Trump hit with tariff rates on Monday, are both major producers of aluminum, while Japan and South Korea, also on the list, are both major steel producers.

“Reciprocal tariffs are making headlines, but the product-specific tariffs will still have a significant impact on the domestic market,” Mike Lowell, a partner at law firm ReedSmith, told CNBC.

High rates and no delays

Last month, Trump announced that he was doubling tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50% for most countries, effective the following day.

Steel and aluminum are essential materials for durable goods like refrigerators and cars. But they are also the chief components of smaller items Americans use every day, like zippers and kitchenware.

The steel and aluminum tariffs are a continuation of Trump’s first-term trade agenda, when he implemented a 25% tariff on steel and 10% tariff on aluminum imports in 2018, causing near-immediate price spikes, Reuters reports.

But they are also different from his first term tariffs in important ways. Firstly, the rates are much higher — in some cases double their previous levels. Secondly, the tariff rates today are being layered on top of other customs duties.

“The use of section 232 together with other instruments is adding further complexity to the tariff landscape and elevates the importance of country negotiations to get exemption,” Iacob Koch-Weser, an associate director of global trade and investment at BCG wrote last month.

Trump has repeatedly cited Section 232 of the massive 1962 Trade Expansion Act to justify his sector-specific tariffs. That measure permits the president to unilaterally adjust tariff rates when America’s national security is under threat.

A different law, Section 301, is being used to impose tariffs on specific products from China. Some of these were imposed during Trump’s first term, and remained largely in place during the tenure of his successor, President Joe Biden.

Another sector that has been hit hard with specific tariffs is cars and auto parts. That 25% rate disproportionally impacts Japan and South Korea, two leading automotive exporters to the United States.

The White House is still considering whether to grant exemptions on the auto tariffs to some companies, partly in response to intense lobbying by industry groups, CNBC reported.

The White House in April did sign an executive order preventing the auto tariffs from being stacked with other levies, such as on aluminum and steel, bringing some relief to the auto industry.

But given that supply chains often have delayed reactions to tariffs, Trump’s levy on auto parts may not be fully felt for years.

Broad presidential authority

Experts have also noted that Trump’s legal authority to set and adjust tariffs is more firmly established when it comes to sector-specific imports than it is for his country-specific “reciprocal” rates.

“Section 232 tariffs are central to President Trump’s tariff strategy,” said Lowell, of ReedSmith.

“They aren’t the target of the pending litigation, and they’re more likely to survive a legal challenge and continue into the next presidential administration, which is what we saw with the aluminum and steel tariffs originally imposed under the first Trump administration,” he added.

To justify imposing country-by-country tariffs earlier this year, Trump invoked emergency powers that are currently being challenged in federal court. If the president loses that case, he may decide to fall back on sector tariffs as a different way of leveraging U.S. economic power.

Trump has also already floated the possibility of imposing additional sector-specific tariffs on agricultural products, iPhones, trucks and other items, though no action has been reported yet.

Trump had previously ordered the Commerce Department to institute a Section 232 national security investigation into both copper and lumber imports, with results due in November.

But his Tuesday comments suggest that the steep levies could be coming much sooner.

“Today, we’re doing copper,” Trump said of the commodity that makes up most of the electrical wiring in American homes.

Source : cnbc

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Glendon

Economic

Stocks

Wall Street's main indexes climbed higher on Wednesday, with Nvidia soaring to a $4 trillion valuation, while investors shrugged off President Donald Trump's latest tariff salvo.

Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab rose 2.2% to become the first company to ever hit $4 trillion in market value, solidifying its position as one of Wall Street's most-favored stocks to tap in the ongoing surge in demand for artificial intelligence technologies.

At 9:47 a.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI), opens new tab rose 286.20 points, or 0.65%, to 44,526.96, the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab gained 39.70 points, or 0.64%, to 6,265.22 and the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC), opens new tab gained 195.72 points, or 0.95%, to 20,614.19.

Seven of 11 S&P sectors clocked gains, with the technology index (.SPLRCT), opens new tab leading the pack with a 1.2% rise.

Trump ramped up his trade offensive on Tuesday, announcing a 50% tariff on copper and vowing to slap long-threatened levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.

This came just a day after he jolted 14 trading partners with a fresh wave of tariff warnings, and said that at least seven new notices would drop later in the day.

The market's reaction to the latest salvo was in contrast with Monday's selloff - triggered by the White House's new tariff threats against Japan and South Korea.

With tariff deadlines now pushed to August 1, investors are pinning their hopes on negotiations to avert a full-blown trade war.

"The tariff issue continues to be this sort of seesaw and because of that back-and-forth, it obviously has given investors a bit of a calm," said Philip Blancato, chief market strategist at Osaic Wealth.

"Markets will react if they see an impact of tariffs in second-quarter earnings next week. But if earnings continue to improve, that just gives them an even longer wait for the tariff negotiations to get finalized," said Ross Bramwell, investment strategist at Homrich Berg.

Meanwhile, after last week's record closes for the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq - buoyed by a surprisingly robust jobs report -investors are turning their attention to Thursday's initial jobless claims for the next pulse check on the labor market.

Traders will also parse through the minutes from the Federal Reserve's June meeting, due at 2:00 p.m. ET, for any hints about when policymakers might resume easing rates.

While a July rate reduction is almost fully ruled out, the odds of a September cut stand at about 66%, according to CME Group's FedWatch tool.

Trump's erratic tariff actions have sparked concerns about global growth and inflation, while also complicating the work of the Fed, which has adopted a wait-and-see approach on monetary policy.

Among stocks, AES Corp (AES.N), opens new tab rose 14.3% after Bloomberg reported that the power provider was exploring options, including a sale.

Health insurer UnitedHealth Group (UNH.N), opens new tab slipped 2% after the Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Department of Justice was investigating how the company deployed doctors and nurses to gather diagnoses that increased its Medicare payments.

Shares of U.S. advertising firms Interpublic (IPG.N), opens new tab and Omnicom (OMC.N), opens new tab fell over 1.5% each, after peer WPP (WPP.L), opens new tab slashed its annual profit guidance.

Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by a 2.34-to-1 ratio on the NYSE. There were 70 new highs and 12 new lows on the NYSE and by a 2.23-to-1 ratio on the Nasdaq.

The S&P 500 posted 10 new 52-week highs and three new lows while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 31 new highs and 21 new lows.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Adam

Economic

This time it's real, probably.

The reciprocal tariff deadline that was originally set for April and then pushed to July is now delayed until August. But the latest deferral is the final one, the president said, leaving the door open for a few more weeks of negotiations laced with a sense of finality.

The first and most obvious takeaway from this week's bout of tariff extensions and threatening letters is that Wall Street appears to be giving Trump the benefit of the doubt, banking on the possibility of deals with India and the European Union.

Stocks were little changed on Tuesday, halting the losses of the prior session, but tepid enough not to push forward. What a contrast from the shock of early April, when traders were caught by surprise by the size and scope of the reciprocal tariff announcements.

Just a few months ago, the market failed to price in the president's campaign trail promises. This time around, uncertainty is still in the air, but it's far more measured. And so is the market response.

The second big takeaway to note is that the new Aug. 1 deadline, paired with the letters to 14 nations, offers both another reprieve and more aggression. There's something for everyone here.

Administration officials committed to ushering in a new trade regime have given themselves a little more time to show results while at the same time, the flurry of letters to two dozen US trading partners has amped up the stakes.

On the flip side, investors buying into the "TACO" trade, the idea that "Trump always chickens out," have been emboldened by the latest delay, believing that the president will eventually dial back his trade threats. We are, after all, back to surfing record highs in part for that very reason.

But whether you believe the administration is sticking to the spirit of its plan or implicitly conceding to the difficulties of transforming global trade, the new deadline will bring its own knock-on effects.

That's because, as any business trying to plan would say, a delay is a double-edged sword.

That no new tariffs will be slapped on trading partners, at least for a little while, surely comes as a relief to exporters from countries like Malaysia, South Africa, and Indonesia. But as so many analysts and executives have warned over the past several months, the uncertainty surrounding US trade policy is its own kind of financial hindrance. Similar to the prior extension, the August postponement doesn't resolve that uncertainty but merely prolongs it. At least, one might say, it's not another 90-day pause.

That has ramifications for businesses as well as central bank policymakers. Fed Chair Jerome Powell and his colleagues are weighing mixed economic signals — from a downward revision to first quarter GDP growth to a slight uptick in PCE inflation and continuing jobless claims reaching their highest level since 2021.

For the Fed, at least, a delay dovetails nicely with its reiterated wait-and-see approach, balancing lukewarm economic readings alongside the need to assess the true impacts of tariffs that have yet to be implemented. But for everyone else, it may mean further reluctance to change interest rate policy until the deals firm up.

The economy hasn't buckled despite new levies. But the full suite of tariffs hasn't landed yet. Pushing out the tariffs also means another delay in fully understanding them.