Trump Vows To Start 'economic War' If Russia-Ukraine Talks Fall Through

Summary:

Donald Trump, during a Tuesday cabinet meeting at the White House, warned that if Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskiy fail to meet and stop the war in Ukraine, he is ready to start what he called “an economic war.”

“It will not be a world war, but it’ll be an economic war, and an economic war is going to be bad. It’s going to be bad for Russia, and I don’t want that,” he said.

Trump had previously promised to end the war on his first day in office. But even after taking the reins again, his efforts have yet to produce a breakthrough.

Putin and Zelenskiy meeting still not scheduled after summit

Trump believed his meeting with Putin in Anchorage on August 15 would pave the way for talks between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders.

That meeting, the first direct exchange between the two since the war began over three years ago, led the White House to believe Putin had agreed to meet Zelenskiy. Officials even said planning had started. But more than a week later, no date had been confirmed.

The Kremlin never publicly accepted the terms, and no summit has been announced. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, speaking with NBC on Friday, said Putin was willing to meet Zelenskiy only when a proper agenda was finalized.

“This agenda is not ready at all,” Lavrov said, pushing back on the idea that talks were imminent. Trump responded to those comments directly during his Tuesday briefing, saying, “Everybody’s posturing,” and that both leaders were hesitating instead of moving forward.

On August 18, Trump held a follow-up call with Putin to propose a formal peace summit, shortly after he met at the White House with Zelenskiy and a group of European leaders. That earlier meeting focused on establishing long-term security guarantees aimed at stopping future Russian aggression.

Zelenskiy, for his part, stated publicly on August 23 that the guarantees were nearly finalized. “In the coming days,” he said, he expected to announce the full terms, with U.S. and European support.

Trump doubles tariffs as warning to nations buying Russian crude

Trump hasn’t limited his warnings to just Russia. He’s already moved forward with economic punishment by doubling tariffs to 50% on Indian imports, targeting India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.

He’s also put pressure on other countries still buying crude from Russia, saying they’re helping fund the war. So far, he hasn’t taken additional steps against China or others, but those warnings remain in place.

Despite keeping lines open with Moscow, Trump has grown frustrated that Russian attacks in Ukraine have resumed quickly after calls with Putin. “Zelenskiy’s not exactly innocent either,” he said during Tuesday’s meeting.

Trump reminded reporters that he had previously criticized the Ukrainian president for not showing enough appreciation for U.S. support. He once again described Zelenskiy as part of the problem, not just a victim of Russian aggression.

Source: CryptoSlate

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Daniel Carter

Political

U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff said on Tuesday President Donald Trump will chair a meeting on Gaza at the White House on Wednesday and added that Washington expected Israel's war in the Palestinian territory to be settled by the end of the year.

WHY IT'S IMPORTANT

Trump had promised a swift end to the war in Gaza during the 2024 U.S. election campaign and after taking office in January but almost seven months into his term, that stated goal remains elusive.

Trump's term began with a ceasefire which lasted two months and ended when Israeli strikes killed around 400 Palestinians on March 18. In recent weeks, images of starving Palestinians, including children, in Gaza have shocked the world and fueled criticism of Israel over the worsening conditions.

KEY QUOTES

When asked on Fox News' "Special Report with Bret Baier" show if there is a post-war plan for Gaza, Witkoff said: "Yes, we've got a large meeting in the White House tomorrow, chaired by the president, and it's a very comprehensive plan we're putting together on the next day."

When asked "should Israel be doing anything differently to end the war and get the hostages home," Witkoff said: "We think that we're going to settle this one way or another, certainly before the end of this year."

Witkoff said Israel was open to continuing discussions with Palestinian militant group Hamas. He also said Hamas had signaled they were open to a settlement.

CONTEXT

U.S. ally Israel's devastating assault on Gaza since October 2023 has killed over 62,000 Palestinians, Gaza health authorities say. It has also caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and prompted accusations of genocide and war crimes at international courts that Israel denies.

The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023 when Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, Israeli tallies show.

Source: Reuters

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Daniel Carter

Central Bank

Political

Lisa Cook, governor of the US Federal Reserve, and U.S. President Donald Trump.

Trump's decision not only put investors and economists on alert, but brought attention to the complicated innerworkings of the U.S. central bank. It also marks the latest escalation of Trump's monthslong pressure campaign against the Fed, historically politically independent, to lower interest rates.

Why do we follow the Federal Reserve?

The Federal Reserve manages monetary policy for the United States. Its dual mandate, set out in a 1977 act of Congress that amended the Federal Reserve Act, is to maximize full employment and ensure stable prices. Because the U.S. is home to the world's largest economy, the 111-year-old central bank also helps set the economic tone for all other developed as well as emerging markets. The Fed also supervises and regulates banks and their financial activities through a series of examinations, stress testing and corrective actions, and attempts to identify and mitigate systemic risks.

A 12-person group within the Fed called the Federal Open Market Committee, or FOMC, sets the key overnight borrowing rate, currently set at 4.25% to 4.50%. The fed funds rate is the target interest rate that banks charge each other for overnight loans to meet their reserve requirements, and helps set the cost of home mortgages, car loans and credit card debt. The FOMC holds regularly scheduled meetings at least eight times a year.

Who is Lisa Cook?

Cook, the first African-American woman to sit on the Fed, has served as governor since 2022, according to her bank biography. Reappointed the following year, her 15-year term is due to expire in 2038.

Before joining the Fed, Cook was a professor of economics and international relations at Michigan State University. A holder of a PhD in economics from the University of California, Berkeley, Cook was previously director of the American Economic Association Summer Training Program, a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research, on the faculty of Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government and a national fellow at Stanford University.

From 2011 to 2012, Dr. Cook served as senior economist on the Council of Economic Advisers under President Barack Obama.

What is a Fed governor?

The Fed's Board of Governors consists of seven members who are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The governors are considered the core of the institution and are permanent members of the closely-watched FOMC. The other five voting members of the FOMC consist of the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, a permanent member, and a rotating cast of four Reserve Bank presidents.

Why is Trump firing her? Has she responded?

In a social media post, Trump cited allegations that Cook made false statements on mortgage applications. Cook responded by saying he did not have the authority to fire her and that she would sue.

The Fed said in an official statement on Tuesday afternoon that it would abide by any court decision governing the legality of Cook's firing. Although the president can fire a Fed governor "for cause," the law doesn't exactly define what that means. The case is expected to wind up before the Supreme Court.

Is there a secondary motive?

While Trump cited the mortgage issue, the move to fire Cook also comes amid his push for the Fed its key borrowing rate. Earlier this summer, Trump floated the idea of firing Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who he has repeatedly blamed for keeping rates unchanged since late last year.

Trump may get his wish: Fed funds futures are pricing in a more than 89% likelihood that the central bank cuts rates at its next policy gathering in September, according to the CME FedWatch tool. That market assessment, however, is based more on a weak July labor report and downward revisions to job growth in May and June, rather than political pressure from the White House.

What has the market reaction been?

Following a trend in place since Trump resumed office in January, investors largely shook off any immediate concern that politics would intrude on monetary policy. Stocks rose on Tuesday.

But signs of concern showed up in other areas. An index tracking the U.S. dollar against a basket of foreign currencies slid on Tuesday as investors looked to international alternatives. Gold — traditionally regarded as a safe store of value in times of rising inflation — rose in reaction to the White House move.

What's the dispute mean for Main Street?

Everyday Americans won't feel immediate impacts from Trump's decision on Cook. But it could have longer-term ramifications for economic policy.

If Trump is able to remove Cook, it would create an opening to appoint an FOMC governor likely to vote in favor of lower interest rates.

Source: CNBC

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Manuel

Cryptocurrency

Political

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced the Department of Commerce will begin issuing GDP and other economic statistics on blockchain during a White House cabinet meeting on Aug. 26.

Positioning the technology as a government-wide data distribution tool, Lutnick told President Donald Trump:

“The Department of Commerce is going to start issuing its statistics on the blockchain, cause you [Trump] are the crypto president, and we are going to put the GDP on the blockchain so people can use the blockchain for data distribution.”

Lutnick said the Commerce Department plans to make blockchain-based statistics “available for the entire government” while working through implementation details.

The announcement represents the most prominent federal blockchain deployment under the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly policies.

Existing federal programs

The Commerce initiative builds on existing blockchain pilots across federal agencies.

Treasury tested a grant distribution system using blockchain to track drawdowns with automatic reconciliation and audit trails, though it never launched publicly.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission operates a pilot program evaluating tokenized collateral and stablecoin-based financial transactions in regulated markets.

At the same time, the Small Business Administration has evaluated blockchain for monitoring fraud and performance metrics in loan programs, according to Government Accountability Office reports.

The Department of Defense and Homeland Security are exploring the use of blockchain for parts tracking, supply chain authentication, and digital documentation.

The Navy and the Defense Logistics Agency collaborate with SIMBA Chain to track high-value parts through blockchain ledgers, thereby reducing manual data entry in defense supply chains.

Customs and Border Protection previously ran blockchain trials to verify intellectual property data on imports and spot counterfeit goods.

Congressional support

The blockchain push aligns with pending congressional legislation. The “Deploying American Blockchains Act of 2025,” sponsored by Rep. Kat Cammack and passed by the House on June 23, moved to the Senate on June 24.

The bill directs the Secretary of Commerce to promote US competitiveness in blockchain deployment and applications.

The legislation would establish a Commerce Department Blockchain Deployment Program and create advisory committees that include federal agencies, private sector representatives, and blockchain infrastructure operators.

The program would examine how federal agencies can benefit from distributed ledger technology while addressing concerns related to cybersecurity and regulatory compliance.

The Commerce Department’s GDP blockchain initiative represents the latest federal commitment to distributed ledger technology for core government functions.

Source: Cryptoslate

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Manuel

Central Bank

Bond

President Donald Trump’s unprecedented and escalating attack on the Federal Reserve runs the risk of backfiring by hitting financial markets and the economy with higher long-term borrowing costs.

For weeks, he has lambasted Chair Jerome Powell for not slashing interest rates deeply to stimulate the economy and — as Trump sees it — lower the government’s debt bills.

He’s already nominated the head of his Council of Economic Advisers to the central bank’s board and is now seeking to oust Governor Lisa Cook, setting the stage for a legal battle over the institution’s political autonomy.

Yet for all the Fed’s power over short-term interest rates, it’s the 10-year Treasury yield — set in real-time by traders around the world — that largely determines what Americans pay for trillions of dollars of mortgages, business loans and other debts.

And even as Powell signals he’s ready to start easing monetary policy as soon as next month, those rates have been stubbornly high for other reasons: Tariffs are threatening to worsen still-elevated inflation; the budget deficit is poised to keep flooding the market with new Treasuries; and Trump’s tax cuts may even deliver a jolt of stimulus next year.

Throw in fears that a Fed loyal to the president could cut rates too far, too fast — jeopardize the central bank’s inflation-fighting credibility in the process — and long-term rates could wind up even higher than they are now, squeezing the economy and potentially roiling other markets.

“The combination of weaker US payroll growth and the White House baiting of the Fed, both institutional and personal, is starting to create real issues for investors in US Treasuries,” said David Roberts, head of fixed income at Nedgroup Investments, who expects long-term rates to rise even if short-term ones fall. “Inflation is running way above the Fed’s target. Much cheaper money now would likely stoke a boom, a weaker US dollar, and materially higher inflation.” Trump’s Fed Gamble Risks Pushing Key Bond Rates Even Higher_1

Trump’s Fed Gamble Risks Pushing Key Bond Rates Even Higher_1

The pressure on long-term interest rates isn’t unique to the US. They’ve been propped up in the UK, France and other countries by investors’ worries about the same combination of high government debt loads and increasingly unpredictable politics.

But the crosscurrents of Trump’s return to the White House have posed their own challenges.

During last year’s presidential campaign, when investors started betting on his victory, 10-year Treasury yields rose sharply even as the Fed started pulling its benchmark overnight rate back from a more than two decade high. That’s because investors were anticipating that the Republican’s tax-cut and deregulation agenda would add fuel to what was, at the time, a surprisingly resilient economy.

Since Trump has taken office, though, the Fed has been on hold as his unpredictable trade war upends the economic outlook, spooks foreign investors and threatens to push up consumer prices. When Trump’s April tariff rollout unleashed one of the worst bond selloffs in recent decades, sending yields surging, Trump paused them, saying the markets were “getting a little bit yippy, a little bit afraid.”

He has since reimposed the import levies and his trade policy has continued to remain in flux. At the same time, his tax-cut bill is set to add more than $3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, which will add to the stockpile of debt unless his tariffs are kept in place by future presidents and wind up providing enough revenue to offset the cost.

“The US has to issue a tremendous amount of debt in order to fund its deficit,” said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Investment Management.

He said that overhang is adding to concerns about growth and inflation. “As a result, I would expect that long rates will remain higher and more volatile than the market expects.”

While Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said the administration’s cost-cutting and pro-growth policies would eventually pull down the 10-year yield — which he has held up as a key benchmark of success — that hasn’t happened yet. While shorter-term yields have dropped on anticipation of another round of Fed cuts, the 10-year’s rose as high as 4.31% Tuesday before settling around 4.26%, roughly where it was at the time of Trump’s election in November. The 30-year yield edged up to 4.92%.

That marked a relatively muted response to Trump’s announcement that he was firing Cook from the Fed over unproven allegations of mortgage fraud, a move that Cook has vowed to fight in court. The Fed said it will abide by the outcome of the case.

What Bloomberg Strategists say...

“The attempted removal of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook dominated traders’ thinking Tuesday. Higher term premium at the long end of the curve has been the biggest fallout so far. However, if efforts to gain political control of the the Fed gain more traction, we should expect a larger reaction both in premiums and inflation expectations.” —Edward Harrison, Macro Strategist, Markets Live

Some of the market’s response reflects expectations that the courts will protect the Fed’s independence. Priya Misra, a portfolio manager at JPMorgan Investment Management, pointed to the “institutional safeguards that protect and jealously guard” the Fed from political pressure. Even Cook’s replacement, she said, would unlikely alter the Fed’s near-term trajectory.

Moreover, with job growth slowing and Powell now telegraphing that another round of rate cuts may start as soon as next month, traders are already pricing in five quarter-point reductions through the end of next year. Powell, a Trump appointee whose term as chair ends in May, has also said he wouldn’t step down from his role and has sought to insulate the central bank from politics.

Yet, a mounting effort by Trump to reshape the Fed would almost certainly keep bond markets on edge — and long-term debt yields elevated.

Markets have grown accustomed to the Fed’s autonomy, with recent presidents going out of their way not to be seen as influencing the central bank’s policy.

Its insulation from electoral politics hasn’t been an issue for investors since the early 1970s, when the Nixon administration sought to keep rates low by pressuring then Fed Chair Arthur Burns. That has served as a cautionary tale ever since, given the subsequent surge of inflation that many blamed on the central bank for caving to the president.

“The unspoken Fed mandate is don’t be Arthur Burns,” said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. “You don’t bow to political pressure.”

Source: Bloomberg

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Manuel

Cryptocurrency

Standard Chartered said Ethereum (ETH) and the companies holding it in their treasuries remain undervalued, even as the second-largest crypto surged to a record $4,955 on Aug. 25.

Geoffrey Kendrick, the bank’s head of crypto research, said treasury firms and exchange-traded funds have absorbed nearly 5% of all Ethereum in circulation since June. Treasury companies bought 2.6%, while ETFs added 2.3%.

Combined, that 4.9% stake represents one of the fastest accumulation streaks in crypto history, surpassing the speed at which Bitcoin (BTC) treasuries and ETFs acquired 2% of supply in late 2024.

Building toward 10%

Kendrick said the recent buying spree marks the early phase of a broader accumulation cycle. In a July note, he projected that treasury firms could eventually control 10% of all ether outstanding.

Kendrick argued that with companies such as BitMINE publicly targeting 5% ownership, the goal appears attainable. He noted that this would leave another 7.4% of supply still in play, creating strong tailwinds for Ethereum’s price.

The sharp pace of accumulation emphasizes the growing role of institutional structures in crypto markets. Kendrick said the alignment of ETF flows with treasury purchases highlights a feedback loop that could tighten supply further and support higher prices.

Kendrick revised the lender’s previous forecasts and said Ethereum could climb to $7,500 by year-end. He also called the latest pullback a “great entry point” for investors positioning ahead of further inflows.

Valuation gaps

While buying pressure has lifted prices, valuations of ether-holding firms have moved in the opposite direction.

Net asset value (NAV) multiples for SharpLink and BitMINE, the two most established ETH treasury companies, have dropped below those of Strategy, the largest Bitcoin treasury firm.

Kendrick said the discount is unjustified given that ETH treasuries can capture a 3% staking return, while Strategy generates no such income on its Bitcoin stash.

He also pointed to SBET’s recent plan to repurchase shares if its NAV multiple falls below 1.0, saying that creates a hard floor for valuations.

Source: Cryptoslate

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Manuel

Central Bank

Political

Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook will file a lawsuit to prevent President Donald Trump from firing her, a lawyer for the embattled central bank official said on Tuesday, kicking off what could be a protracted legal fight over the White House's effort to shape U.S. monetary policy.

"His attempt to fire her, based solely on a referral letter, lacks any factual or legal basis. We will be filing a lawsuit challenging this illegal action," Cook's lawyer, prominent Washington attorney Abbe Lowell, said in a statement.

The statement was issued a day after Trump said he would fire Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's governing body, for alleged "deceitful and potential criminal conduct" related to mortgages she took out in 2021.

"We need people that are 100% above board and it doesn't seem like she was," Trump told reporters at a meeting. He said he had several "good people" in mind to replace Cook but would abide by any court decision that left her in her job.

Trump's showdown with the nominally independent central bank follows other largely successful efforts to bring other elements of the U.S. government under his direct control. Since returning to office in January, the president has overseen the departure of hundreds of thousands of civil servants, dismantled several agencies and withheld billions of dollars of spending authorized by Congress.

Trump pressured the Fed to lower interest rates during his first term in the White House and he has escalated that campaign in recent months. The president has demanded that rates be cut by several percentage points and threatened to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell, although he recently backed away from that saber-rattling.

Cook's departure would allow Trump to pick a majority of the Fed's seven-member board, including two incumbents and the pending nomination of White House economist Stephen Miran.

The Fed said in a statement that Cook and other board members serve 14-year tenures and cannot be removed easily from office in order to ensure that monetary policy decisions are based on economic data and "the long-term interests of the American people."

The attempt to influence U.S. monetary policy has knocked confidence in the dollar and U.S. sovereign debt and sparked fears of global financial turmoil. But market reaction to Trump's latest Fed gambit was tame on Tuesday.

Wall Street's main equities indexes were largely flat on the day, while the dollar dropped. Yields on 2-year, 5-year and 10-year Treasury notes fell, reflecting higher expectations of a near-term rate cut, and rose on longer-dated bonds, in a sign the Fed's inflation-fighting credentials might weaken.

Trump said in a letter to Cook on Monday that he had "sufficient cause" to fire her because she had described separate properties in Michigan and Georgia as primary residences on mortgage applications before she joined the Fed in 2022.

In recent months Trump has fired several Black women who held senior government positions, including the head of the Library of Congress and the chair of the National Labor Relations Board.

The Trump administration has also targeted other political opponents with similar accusations of mortgage fraud, including New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Black woman who secured a half-billion-dollar civil fraud judgment against Trump last year. A New York appeals court threw out the penalty last week, while preserving the case.

MORTGAGE QUESTIONS

William Pulte, a Trump appointee who is director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, first raised questions about Cook's mortgages last week and referred the matter to U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi for investigation. Bondi has yet to say whether the Justice Department will take action.

Trump accused Cook on Monday of having "deceitful and criminal conduct in a financial matter" and said he did not have confidence in her "integrity."

Cook took out the two mortgages in question when she was an academic. Loans for primary residences can carry lower rates than mortgages on investment properties, which are considered riskier by banks. Cook listed three mortgages, including two personal residences, on a 2024 financial disclosure form.

She is due to serve on the Fed board through 2038, but the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 allows removal of a sitting governor "for cause."

Until now, that power has not been tested by U.S. presidents, who largely have taken a hands-off approach to Fed matters as a way to ensure confidence in U.S. monetary policy.

Peter Conti-Brown, a scholar of the Fed's history at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, noted that the mortgage transactions preceded her appointment to the Fed and were in the public record when she was vetted and confirmed by the Senate.

"The idea that you can then reach back, turn the clock backward and say, you know, 'All these things that have happened before now constitute fireable offenses from your official position' is to me incongruous with the entire concept of 'for cause' removal," Conti-Brown said.

It is unclear how the matter might play out ahead of the Fed's next policy meeting on September 16-17.

Academic research has consistently found that policymakers who are allowed to manage inflation independent of political meddling generally achieve better outcomes, a principle that may now be tested at the world's most influential central bank.

"The Fed as an institution escaped harm in the first Trump administration, and will not be so fortunate this time around," said Tim Duy, chief U.S. economist at SGH Macro Advisors.