Strong U.S. Data Anchors Dollar Despite Policy Risks and Global Headwinds

Bond Market Eyes Fiscal Turbulence and Foreign Reaction

Stocks Caught Between Trade Hopes and Political Uncertainty

Yen Vulnerability Intensifies as Risk Sentiment Wavers

Trade Talks and Policy Continuity in the Spotlight

Source: Bloomberg

What Exactly is the Clarity Act? Unpacking the Core of US Crypto Law

According to reports, including one from Unfolded on Telegram, the Clarity Act is designed to bring much-needed structure to the burgeoning crypto market. But what does that truly mean? While the specifics of the bill’s final text will define its full impact, its core objective is to provide a clear framework for digital assets, defining their legal status and establishing guidelines for market participants. This could involve:

The absence of clear US crypto law has long been a point of contention, leading to legal battles, compliance headaches, and a chilling effect on innovation. This act, therefore, represents a significant legislative attempt to address these long-standing issues.

Why is Crypto Market Regulation So Important Right Now?

The call for robust crypto market regulation has grown louder with the increasing mainstream adoption of digital assets. While the decentralized nature of crypto is a core tenet, it also presents unique challenges for oversight. Here’s why regulation is becoming indispensable:

How Will the Clarity Act Shape Digital Asset Legislation?

The Clarity Act is not an isolated event; it’s part of a larger, evolving narrative around digital asset legislation in the U.S. For years, various bills and proposals have been put forth, often with differing approaches to classifying and regulating cryptocurrencies. This act could serve as a foundational piece, influencing future legislative efforts and potentially harmonizing the fragmented regulatory landscape.

Historically, the debate has often centered on whether digital assets fall under the purview of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as securities or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as commodities. The Clarity Act aims to provide a more definitive answer, which could reduce regulatory arbitrage and provide clarity for projects seeking to launch or operate in the U.S. This clarity is crucial for innovators, as it allows them to design their projects with a clear understanding of the legal requirements from the outset.

Furthermore, this legislation could set a precedent for how other countries approach crypto regulation, potentially influencing global standards and fostering greater interoperability in the international digital asset ecosystem.

What Does This Mean for the Future of Cryptocurrency Policy in the US?

The passing of the Clarity Act by the House is a significant milestone, but it’s just one step in the complex legislative process. For it to become law, it must also pass the Senate and be signed by the President. This journey can be fraught with challenges, including potential amendments, differing opinions in the Senate, and the possibility of a presidential veto.

However, the House’s action sends a strong signal regarding the direction of cryptocurrency policy in the U.S. It indicates a growing recognition among lawmakers of the need to move beyond enforcement actions and towards a comprehensive regulatory framework. This proactive approach, if successful, could:

Actionable Insights: Navigating the New Regulatory Landscape

For individuals and entities involved in the crypto space, the passing of the Clarity Act by the House necessitates attention and preparation. While the final law is yet to be enacted, understanding its potential implications is key:

The landscape is shifting, and adaptability will be key. This is an opportune time to engage with industry associations and policy discussions to ensure your voice is heard as these crucial regulations take shape.

Conclusion: A New Chapter for the Crypto Market

The U.S. House’s passage of the Clarity Act marks a significant turning point for the crypto market. It signifies a decisive move towards bringing order and predictability to an industry that has long operated in the shadows of regulatory ambiguity. While the journey to becoming law is still ahead, this legislation underscores a growing governmental recognition of digital assets’ importance and the urgent need for a clear, comprehensive cryptocurrency policy.

This act has the potential to unlock new levels of institutional investment, enhance investor protection, and solidify the U.S.’s position as a leader in financial innovation. The future of crypto in the U.S. is poised for a new chapter, one that promises greater clarity, stability, and growth. Staying informed and adaptable will be crucial as this landmark legislation continues its path through the halls of power.

Source: CryptoSlate

San Francisco Federal Reserve President Mary Daly reiterated on Thursday it is "reasonable" to expect two interest rate cuts before the end of this year, particularly with the impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs looking more muted than originally expected.

Inflation is still above the U.S. central bank's 2% target and there's still "some work to do" to bring it down, Daly said at the Rocky Mountain Economic Summit in Victor, Idaho. But the Fed also doesn't want to keep rates restrictive for too long because that would unnecessarily hurt the labor market, she said.

"I don't think we need to slow precipitously to produce the last mile on inflation," Daly said. "I wouldn't want to see more weakness in the labor market ... I really wouldn't want to see that, which is why you can't wait forever" on cutting rates.

Companies are figuring out ways to avoid tariffs and are not passing on all of their increased costs to their customers, and despite a doubling of the effective average tariff rate under Trump the increased levies on imports are not so far spilling more broadly into overall inflation.

"We haven't seen any evidence that that's occurring," Daly said, though recent consumer price data does show the price of goods is rising. Offsetting that, however, is encouragingly lower inflation in non-housing-related services inflation, she said.

Asked if she would support reducing the current policy rate range of 4.25%-4.50% when the Fed meets in two weeks, Daly noted that she expects rate cuts to resume as inflation falls, with the policy rate at an ultimate settling point of 3% or somewhere higher than that level.

"Whether it happens in July or September or some other month is really not the most relevant piece," she said. More relevant, Daly added, is that rates will be reduced.

"We don't want to unnecessarily tighten the economy in a way that hurts the labor market or growth. So that's the direction of travel," she said.

Two of the Fed's 19 policymakers have said they believe a July rate cut could be appropriate; others have signaled they expect it to take longer to be able to judge the effect of the tariffs and other Trump policies on inflation and the labor market, and therefore to know if a rate cut would be appropriate.

Financial markets reflect very little expectation for a rate cut at the Fed's July 29-30 meeting, with bets focused on the September 16-17 meeting as a much more likely time for the policy easing to resume.

Source: Yahoo Finance

The U.S. Federal Reserve should not cut interest rates "for some time" as the impact of Trump administration tariffs begin passing through to consumer prices, with tight monetary policy needed to keep inflationary psychology in check, Federal Reserve governor Adriana Kugler said on Thursday.

With unemployment stable and low, and inflation pressures building, "I find it appropriate to hold our policy rate at the current level for some time," Kugler said in remarks prepared for delivery at a housing forum in Washington D.C. "This still-restrictive policy stance is important to keep longer-run inflation expectations anchored."

Ongoing hiring and a 4.1% unemployment rate show the job market "stable and close to full employment," Kugler said. "Inflation, meanwhile, remains above the FOMC’s 2% goal and is facing upward pressure from implemented tariffs."

That pressure was apparent in this week's Consumer Price Index report that showed large price increases across an array of heavily imported goods, and Kugler said she felt there were many reasons to think price pressures would continue to build -- including the fact that the administration still seems to intend to impose higher levies on major trading partners in coming weeks.

"I see upward pressure on inflation from trade policies, and I expect additional price increases later in the year," she said. She estimated that coming data will show the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, which the Fed uses to set its 2% inflation target, increased 2.5% in June, while the "core" measure outside of volatile food and energy items increased 2.8%, higher than in May.

"Both headline and core inflation have shown no progress in the last six months," Kugler said.

The Fed meets on July 29-30 and policymakers are expected to hold the benchmark interest rate steady in the current range of 4.25% to 4.5%. It will be the fifth consecutive meeting without a change since the Fed paused a series of rate cuts in December.

Since then, and to President Donald Trump's consternation, focus has turned to the impact Trump administration trade and other policies will have on inflation, jobs and economic growth. Fed policymakers say they are reluctant to resume rate reductions until they are more certain that tariffs will lead to only a one-time price adjustment, as administration officials contend, and not more persistent inflation.

Appointed to the Fed by former President Joe Biden, Kugler's term at the central bank ends in January, creating a vacancy that the Trump administration may use to appoint a replacement for Fed chair Jerome Powell when his term as Fed chief ends in May.

Source: Yahoo Finance

Source: TradingView

Source: TradingView

Source: TradingView

Source: Finlogix Economic Calander

来源：ACY

U.S. retail sales rebounded more than expected in June, suggesting a modest improvement in economic activity and giving the Federal Reserve cover to delay cutting interest rates while it gauges the inflation fallout from import tariffs.

That report was reinforced by data from the Labor Department on Thursday that showed first-time applications for unemployment benefits dropped to a three-month low last week, consistent with steady job growth in July. The U.S. central bank is under pressure from President Donald Trump to lower borrowing costs.

The Fed is, however, expected to keep its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range, where it has been since December, at its policy meeting later this month.

"Today's data is generally on the firmer side in terms of activity and jobs," said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING. "It supports the view that there is little pressing need for another interest rate cut from the Fed."

Retail sales increased 0.6% last month after an unrevised 0.9% drop in May, the Commerce Department's Census Bureau said.

Economists polled by Reuters had forecast retail sales, which are mostly goods and are not adjusted for inflation, would gain 0.1%. Sales advanced 3.9% on a year-over-year basis.

Part of the nearly broad rise in retail sales last month was likely due to tariff-driven price increases rather than volumes.

Inflation data this week showed solid increases in June in the cost of tariff-sensitive goods like household furnishings and supplies, appliances, sporting goods and toys. Some economists said worries of even higher prices had lifted sales last month.

Still, the retail sales rebound after two straight monthly declines was welcome. Sales had decreased as the boost from households rushing to buy motor vehicles to avoid higher prices from import duties waned.

Auto dealerships led the rise in sales, with receipts increasing 1.2% after decreasing 3.8% in May. Car manufacturers, however, reported a decline in unit sales in June, indicating the rise in receipts was due to higher prices.

Building material garden equipment store sales increased 0.9% last month, as did receipts at clothing retailers. Online retail sales climbed 0.4%, while those at sporting goods, hobby, musical instrument and book stores rose 0.2%.

Sales at food services and drinking places, the only services component in the report, increased 0.6%. Economists view dining out as a key indicator of household finances.

But receipts at electronics and appliance stores dipped 0.1%, as did those at furniture outlets, suggesting tariff-related price rises were suppressing demand.

Stocks on Wall Street were trading higher. The dollar gained versus a basket of currencies. U.S. Treasury yields were mixed.

Retail sales and retail stocks

INFLATION ERODES GAINS

Retail sales excluding automobiles, gasoline, building materials and food services increased 0.5% last month after a downwardly revised 0.2% in May. These so-called core retail sales, which correspond most closely with the consumer spending component of gross domestic product, were previously reported to have increased 0.4% in May.

Toys and figurines are displayed at a Five Below store in Queens, New York City, U.S., July 15, 2025. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

But higher prices in June implied that inflation-adjusted core retail sales rose marginally last month. Together with the downward revision to the May data, it suggests consumer spending increased moderately in the second quarter after nearly stalling in the first quarter.

Economists' consumer spending growth estimates converged below a 1.5% annualized rate in the second quarter. Services, which account for a larger share of consumer spending, have been lackluster as households scaled back on travel.

The Atlanta Fed is forecasting GDP rebounded at a 2.4% annualized rate in the second quarter after contracting at a 0.5% pace in the January-March period. Most of the anticipated pick-up in GDP will come from an ebb in imports.

"Although June's numbers likely exaggerate the underlying pace of spending, households appear to be on firmer footing than we had thought," said Jonathan Millar, senior U.S. economist at Barclays.

Consumer spending is being supported by a stable labor market. A separate report from the Labor Department showed initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 7,000 to a seasonally adjusted 221,000 for the week ended July 12, the lowest level since April.

Economists had forecast 235,000 claims for the latest week.

Motor vehicle assembly plant closures due to maintenance, annual retooling for new models and other reasons likely accounted for some of the drop in claims. Auto manufacturers typically idle assembly lines in summer, though the timing often varies, which could throw off the model that the government uses to strip out seasonal fluctuations from the data.

Nonetheless, layoffs remain historically low. The claims data covered the period during which the government surveyed employers for the nonfarm payrolls component of the employment report for July. Claims fell between the June and July survey periods. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 147,000 jobs in June.

"The series continues to signal steady labor market growth," said Abiel Reinhart, an economist at J.P. Morgan. "Claims remain within the typical range observed over the last couple years."

Risks are, however, rising for both the labor market and consumer spending. Trade policy uncertainty has left companies hesitant to increase hiring, causing many laid-off workers to experience long bouts of unemployment. The number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, increased 2,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.956 million during the week ending July 5, the claims report showed.

Jobless claims

Wage growth has also slowed. While the stock market has rebounded, house prices have declined in many regions, a reduction in household wealth that could hinder spending.

Higher prices from tariffs could also undercut consumption.

There are few signs of exporters absorbing tariffs. A separate report from the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics showed import prices rose 0.1% in June.

But there were strong increases in the prices of imports from China, Japan and the European Union. Prices for imports from Canada and Mexico dipped 0.1%.

"If foreign exporters were absorbing the cost of tariffs, import prices would be declining in proportion to the rise in the tariff rate," said Sarah House, a senior economist at Wells Fargo. "The recent rise in import prices points to foreign suppliers generally resisting price cuts."

A column chart titled "Monthly change in US Import Price Index" that tracks the metric over the past year.

Source: Reuters