IMF’s Gopinath Issues Stark Warning on Soaring Global Debt and Fragile Bond Markets

Economic

Summary:

In her final remarks as IMF Deputy Managing Director, Gita Gopinath cautioned that surging global public debt and mounting bond market fragility present serious risks even for advanced economies amid rising yields...

Global Debt Risks No Longer Abstract, IMF Warns

In a pivotal interview with Bloomberg on August 28, IMF Deputy Managing Director Gita Gopinath warned that global public debt has reached dangerously high levels, posing systemic risks across both advanced and emerging markets. Her remarks signaled a shift from traditional assumptions that markets can "absorb" sovereign debt without destabilizing effects. Today, Gopinath stressed, that assumption no longer holds even for developed economies like the U.S., U.K., and France.

This causal concern arises from the tightening global financial environment, characterized by persistently high interest rates, post-pandemic fiscal expansion, and mounting geopolitical fragmentation. While no major financial crisis has erupted yet, Gopinath cautioned that “absence of crisis does not imply absence of risk.”

Bond Market Fragility: A Structural Warning Sign

Bond markets long considered a barometer of macro-financial health are beginning to crack under the pressure of fiscal imbalances and investor anxiety. In France, 30-year bond yields surged to a 14-year high on fears that the government may fail to meet its deficit-reduction pledges. Similarly, U.K. 30-year gilt yields are hovering near their highest point since 1998, intensifying fiscal stress for the administration of Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

The U.S. is no exception. Its 30-year Treasury yields have climbed well above their multi-year average, directly increasing the cost of government borrowing and raising the long-term fiscal burden. These developments underscore Gopinath’s warning that global bond markets are in an "increasingly fragile" state, made more precarious by inflated equity valuations and policy uncertainty.

Political Interference Threatens Fed’s Operational Independence

Gopinath also addressed a politically sensitive issue: the independence of the U.S. Federal Reserve. Her comments followed recent moves by President Donald Trump to dismiss Fed Governor Lisa Cook a move many view as an effort to influence interest rate policy ahead of the 2026 election cycle.

Though markets remained relatively calm, Gopinath interpreted this not as a sign of stability but as a potential underpricing of political risk. While the Fed’s “operational independence” in setting interest rates remains intact for now, she cautioned against complacency. The specter of executive interference could erode investor trust and amplify volatility if political moves are seen as compromising central bank credibility.

Timing of the Warning Highlights Broader Systemic Concerns

Gopinath’s statements come at a critical moment: global economic growth is decelerating, borrowing costs are rising, and political pressures both domestic and international are intensifying. Her warnings cut across technical analysis and emphasize a broader, systemic vulnerability: that the interconnected debt and bond market architecture is under strain from both fiscal mismanagement and weakening institutional autonomy.

Her final remarks as IMF’s No. 2 official carry additional weight, as she prepares to return to academia at Harvard. During her tenure, Gopinath has been a leading voice on global financial governance, pandemic recovery, and macroeconomic coordination and her departure coincides with a turning point in the post-COVID monetary policy era.

Gita Gopinath’s exit from the IMF leaves behind a sobering set of warnings. The confluence of historic public debt levels, fragile sovereign bond markets, and rising political intervention in monetary institutions presents a potentially volatile mix. While current market behavior appears orderly, the foundations are under stress. With global financial stability increasingly reliant on trust in independent institutions and responsible fiscal policy, any misstep could shift the system from fragile equilibrium to crisis. Investors and policymakers alike should take heed the risk landscape is darker than it appears on the surface.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Tokyo Summit Marks Deepening of Japan–India Strategic Cooperation

During a high-profile summit in Tokyo, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled a 10-year roadmap aimed at significantly expanding economic and technological ties between their two nations. The centerpiece of the announcement was Japan’s commitment to invest 10 trillion yen approximately $68 billion into India’s key sectors through private capital by 2035.

This initiative, as outlined by Prime Minister Ishiba, targets strategic industries such as high technology, digital transformation, and rare earth minerals. His remarks underscored the causal relationship between India’s market potential and Japan’s pursuit of sustainable regional growth amid a volatile global landscape.

A Milestone in Japan’s Confidence in India

Prime Minister Ishiba also revealed that Japan had already met its previous goal of investing 5 trillion yen between 2022 and 2026 two years ahead of schedule demonstrating growing confidence in India’s economic trajectory. This early completion is both symbolic and strategic, reflecting Tokyo’s deepening alignment with New Delhi as a counterweight to regional disruptions.

From India’s perspective, Modi emphasized that the partnership had entered a “new chapter,” anchored in pillars of investment, innovation, economic security, green technology, healthcare, and regional exchanges. The bilateral framework now includes eight key domains that extend beyond trade to institutional cooperation and people-to-people ties.

Workforce Mobility and Supply Chain Integration

One of the most notable aspects of the partnership is a large-scale workforce exchange plan. Over the next five years, the two countries will facilitate the movement of 500,000 individuals including 50,000 skilled Indian workers to contribute to Japan’s labor market and local communities. This exchange not only supports Japan’s demographic needs but also showcases a mutually reinforcing model of combining Japanese capital with Indian talent.

To facilitate investment, Prime Minister Modi pledged further administrative and regulatory reforms to help Japanese firms expand their supply chains in India. He also encouraged investors to leverage what he termed the "synergy of Japanese technology and Indian human capital" a narrative that reaffirms India’s pitch as a strategic manufacturing and innovation hub.

Japan–India Economic Security Initiative and Technological Frontiers

The summit also marked the official launch of the Japan–India Economic Security Initiative, aimed at enhancing supply chain resilience in critical sectors such as semiconductors, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, and emerging technologies. This is a causal response to growing geopolitical risks and reflects a shared goal of reducing dependency on external actors, particularly in sensitive industries.

Both leaders emphasized high-tech cooperation as a top priority. Collaborative projects are expected to focus on artificial intelligence (AI) and next-generation mobility systems including smart ports, advanced aviation, and maritime technologies. These areas align closely with both nations’ industrial policy agendas and long-term development strategies.

Space Collaboration: Chandrayaan-5 and Beyond

In the aerospace domain, ISRO (India) and JAXA (Japan) have agreed to collaborate on the upcoming Chandrayaan-5 lunar mission, with a specific aim of exploring the Moon’s South Pole. The mission, scheduled for 2027–2028, highlights the maturation of space diplomacy between the two nations and could pave the way for more ambitious joint missions in deep space exploration and satellite technologies.

The 2025 Tokyo summit between Japan and India marks a pivotal step in the evolution of a multi-dimensional strategic partnership. With a historic investment commitment, expanded industrial and technological cooperation, and an ambitious framework for workforce and space collaboration, both nations are positioning themselves as co-architects of a new, resilient Indo-Pacific economic order. As global supply chains fragment and geopolitical alignments shift, this bilateral alignment stands out as a model of pragmatic and forward-looking cooperation.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

External Trade Pressures Reverse Canada’s Growth Momentum

Canada’s economy faced a pronounced deceleration in the second quarter of 2025, with fresh U.S. tariffs delivering a direct blow to its export sector. The impact of these protectionist measures has been particularly severe given Canada’s integration into the North American supply chain. While domestic demand provided some insulation against external shocks, the negative trade balance tipped overall growth into contraction territory.

Analysts attribute the downturn primarily to declining export performance. Canada’s tight linkage to U.S. and global value chains renders it especially sensitive to rising trade barriers. The causal relationship between U.S. tariffs and Canada’s export slump is clearly visible in the Q2 figures, revealing how global protectionism can override internal economic momentum.

Domestic Economy Remains Resilient, but Vulnerabilities Grow

Despite the headline contraction, domestic components of GDP showed unexpected strength. According to Derek Holt of Scotiabank, final domestic demand which includes household consumption, business investment, and public sector spending grew by 3.4% quarter-over-quarter. This figure reflects a partial decoupling between domestic and external dynamics, underscoring the short-term resilience of Canada’s internal economy.

However, economists like Jimmy Jean from Desjardins warn that this resilience may mask underlying fragilities. While not yet in a recession, Canada’s exposure to global trade tensions especially from its largest trading partner could trigger deeper declines if external demand continues to weaken. Jean emphasized that the export sector has become a clear structural weak point in Canada’s post-pandemic recovery trajectory.

Monetary Policy Outlook Hinges on Dual Pressures

This economic backdrop presents a complex challenge for the Bank of Canada (BoC). Although strong domestic activity might argue for policy patience, the drag from trade and weakening external demand could tilt the central bank toward a rate cut as early as September. The BoC’s decision will likely rest on upcoming labor market and inflation data. If domestic stability falters or inflation re-accelerates, policymakers may feel compelled to intervene more decisively.

The interplay between export vulnerability and monetary flexibility suggests a bifurcated policy path ahead. A rate cut would aim to stabilize investment and consumer confidence, while a hold might be warranted if internal momentum proves sustainable. The choice will hinge on whether internal strength can continue compensating for external fragility.

Broader Implications for Trade-Dependent Economies

Canada’s experience is not isolated. Economies heavily reliant on U.S. trade including the European Union and Mexico have also reported export slowdowns under the weight of Washington’s widening tariff regime. However, Canada’s deep structural integration with U.S. supply chains particularly in the automotive, energy, and agricultural sectors makes it uniquely susceptible to fluctuations in cross-border trade policy.

As the Trump administration escalates its tariff strategy across multiple regions and product categories, Canada’s economic outlook may become increasingly conditioned by geopolitical trade dynamics rather than domestic fundamentals alone.a

Canada’s second-quarter economic contraction illustrates how quickly external shocks in this case, punitive U.S. tariffs can undermine a stable domestic backdrop. While internal consumption and investment remain supportive, the erosion of export strength threatens broader macroeconomic balance. The Bank of Canada now faces a policy crossroads: either move to shield the economy with a rate cut or gamble on continued domestic momentum to absorb the shock. The decision, and its timing, will be closely watched not just in Ottawa, but across a global economy grappling with renewed trade fragmentation.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

PCE Inflation Accelerates, Testing Fed's 2% Target

According to the latest report from the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation metric showed a 2.9% increase in core prices in July 2024 compared to the same month last year. This marks a 0.1 percentage point rise from June and is the strongest annual gain in five months. On a monthly basis, core PCE rose 0.3%, perfectly in line with market expectations.

Headline PCE, which includes food and energy, climbed 2.6% year-over-year and 0.2% month-over-month. These results match Dow Jones forecasts and signal that while inflation is cooling from 2022 highs, it remains above the Fed’s 2% target, prompting debate over the timing and magnitude of future rate cuts.

Services Drive Price Gains, Tariff Effects Remain Contained

The July inflation uptick is largely attributed to a strong rise in services costs, which increased 3.6% annually and 0.3% monthly. In contrast, goods prices rose a modest 0.5% year-over-year and actually declined 0.1% on the month, suggesting only a weak correlation between goods inflation and recent tariff policy.

Energy prices fell 2.7% compared to a year ago, helping to offset headline inflation, while food prices rose 1.9%. On a monthly basis, energy and food prices decreased by 1.1% and 0.1%, respectively. According to Capital Economics' Harry Chambers, these data points imply that Trump-era tariffs have had limited causal impact on goods inflation, which remains subdued despite new import duties.

Consumer Spending and Income Support Inflation Resilience

Consumer spending in July rose 0.5% month-over-month, aligned with forecasts, and personal incomes increased 0.4%, further reinforcing strong household demand despite elevated prices. This indicates a causal support mechanism for inflation persistence: with consumers still spending, price pressures particularly in services remain sticky.

Although inflation has yet to return to target, Fed officials remain open to rate cuts. Governor Christopher Waller reiterated his support for a potential cut in September, citing the need to respond flexibly to evolving labor market conditions. He hinted at the possibility of a “stronger move” if employment weakens materially in the coming weeks.

According to Morgan Stanley’s Ellen Zentner, the Fed appears “ready” to reduce interest rates but is awaiting confirmation on which risk inflation or labor deterioration poses the greater threat. With July’s inflation data meeting but not exceeding expectations, all attention now turns to the August jobs report, due in early September. This will likely serve as the decisive factor in the Fed’s policy choice.

While core inflation remains elevated, the July PCE report does not on its own rule out a rate cut at the Fed’s September meeting. With tariffs contributing little to inflationary pressure and consumer demand remaining firm, the balance of risks may now shift toward supporting growth. The Fed’s decision will likely rest on the strength or fragility of the upcoming labor market report, making early September a pivotal moment for global monetary policy watchers.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Manuel

Economic

China–U.S. Trade War

A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that most of President Trump's global tariffs were illegal. The ruling explains the president exceeded his authority in using emergency powers to impose them.

The judges allowed the tariffs to stay in place as the case continues to be adjudicated in a lower court. Friday's decision from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reaffirms an earlier ruling by the Court of International Trade.

Trump responded to the decision on Truth Social, saying "ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT!" He also called the court "Highly Partisan" and said "with the help of the United States Supreme Court, we will use [tariffs] to benefit our nation."

The case is expected to eventually make it to the US Supreme Court, but Friday's decision to send it back to a lower court could delay that outcome, Bloomberg reports.

Meanwhile, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has authorized plans to retaliate against the 50% US tariffs imposed by President Trump, though the Brazilian leader emphasized he is looking to negotiate with the US administration.

"This is a somewhat lengthy process, and I'm in no hurry to do anything about reciprocity against the US," Lula said.

Separately, the $800 duty-free loophole ends Friday, with small imported packages to the US facing tariffs of 10% to 50%, depending on their origin.

The European Commission proposed on Thursday to withdraw all tariffs on imported US industrial goods in a bid to speed up the removal of US duties on European cars.

The proposal is the first step in enacting the framework agreement between Trump and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, which was established last month. Trump requested the removal of tariffs before the US lowers its duties on the bloc's auto exports.

Meanwhile, Mexico is set to join the US with tariffs and will raise duties on Chinese goods under its 2026 budget plan, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday. The proposal, due next month, targets cars, textiles, and plastics to shield local industries from cheap imports.

US pressure on Mexico stems from Trump's claim that cheap Chinese goods slip into Mexico before heading north.

Meanwhile, Trump's 50% tariffs on India have now kicked in, a move that experts say could upend a decades-long push by Washington to forge closer ties with New Delhi. Trump added an extra 25% tariff on Indian imports because of the country's purchase of Russian oil.

The unfolding situations with both India and Mexico are the latest examples of how Trump's tariffs are pushing countries to choose sides between the US and China.

Earlier in August, Trump unveiled "reciprocal" tariffs on dozens of US trade partners (which you can see in the graphic below). US Appeals Court Rules Wide Swath of Trump's Tariffs Illegal_1

US Appeals Court Rules Wide Swath of Trump's Tariffs Illegal_1

Those tariffs face legal limbo in an appeals court case that could be decided within days.

Justice Department lawyers and lawyers for a group of small business importers who are challenging the tariffs imposed under this authority argued their positions before the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. If the court rules against the government, it's likely Trump would appeal to the Supreme Court.

Source: Yahoo Finance

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Manuel

Central Bank

Political

Morgan Stanley asked the Federal Reserve to reduce its capital requirements, the regulator said as it announced upcoming capital requirements for most Wall Street banks that are in line with lenders’ expectations.

“The firm requested reconsideration to reduce this requirement,” the Federal Reserve said in a statement Friday. “The board is reviewing the request to reduce the firm’s stress capital buffer requirement,” and plans to make and publish a decision by Sept. 30.

The central bank’s announcement formally wraps up its annual stress-tests exercise, a multistep process that assesses how the nation’s largest lenders are likely to perform under hypothetical economic conditions. It concludes with an updated total Common Equity Tier 1 capital-ratio requirement for each firm, which will take effect Oct 1.

“Morgan Stanley remains actively engaged with the Federal Reserve to reach a final SCB requirement” before Oct. 1, the New York-based bank said in a statement.

The Fed didn’t specify the reduction that Morgan Stanley was requesting. The company said last month that, based on its stress-test result, it expected its CET1 requirement to drop to 12.6% from the current 13.5%.

A total of 22 banks, including Morgan Stanley, underwent and comfortably passed this year’s Fed stress test that determined they would be able to withstand more than $550 billion in losses. Friday’s capital requirements tied to that test is made up of several components, including a minimum CET1 capital-ratio requirement of 4.5% — the same for each company — and the stress capital buffer requirement. The biggest lenders, or so-called global systemically important banks, are also subject to a capital surcharge.

The Fed’s announcement comes as the industry awaits the outcome of the Fed’s planned changes to its stress-test process. In April, the agency unveiled a proposal to average results over two years when setting capital requirements. Michelle Bowman, the Fed’s vice chair for supervision, has said that potential changes would help the agency address the “excessive volatility in the stress-test results and corresponding capital requirements.”

“The individual capital requirements announced today represent a period of transition,” Bowman said in the statement, adding that finalizing the April plan would be an important next step to reducing year-over-year volatility in bank capital requirements.

The Fed also unveiled plans to decrease what’s called the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio, which requires banks to hold a certain amount of capital relative to their assets. The regulator also will move to propose a fresh risk-based capital plan that Wall Street has advocated for.

Source: Bloomberg

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Manuel

Commodity

Political

Oil notched its first monthly loss since April, with trading dominated by concerns about a looming glut and geopolitical issues, including US-led efforts to end the war in Ukraine.

West Texas Intermediate for October delivery slid 0.9% to settle near $64 a barrel, with the US benchmark down 7.6% this month. Brent closed above $68. Oil has lost ground in August on worries that global supplies will run ahead of demand in the coming quarters, boosting stockpiles.

The commodity’s slump deepened on Friday after US consumer sentiment declined to a three-month low, reflecting concerns that tariffs will hurt the economy. Oil Slides to Monthly Loss as Traders Weigh Glut, Geopolitics_1

Oil Slides to Monthly Loss as Traders Weigh Glut, Geopolitics_1

nvestors are also focused on Ukraine and potential shifts in crude flows from Russia. US President Donald Trump was “not happy” about Moscow’s recent strikes on Ukraine, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said. Washington has imposed a 50% levy on most Indian imports to punish the South Asian nation for buying Russian crude.

Moscow unleashed a wave of drone and missile strikes on Kyiv earlier this week, in defiance of US calls for an end to the fighting, killing 18 people, Ukrainian authorities said.

A meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and Russia’s Vladimir Putin was unlikely, according to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Trump has threatened “very big consequences” if Moscow doesn’t come to the negotiating table.

Oil is down 11% this year on concerns that Trump’s trade war will hurt energy consumption at the same time that OPEC+ is working to restore idled capacity.

“More OPEC+ oil is coming to the market amid worries over US economic growth, which keeps the market well-supplied,” said Jens Naervig Pedersen, a strategist at Danske Bank AS.

Trading volumes on Friday were muted ahead of the Labor Day holiday weekend in the US, contributing to exaggerated price swings.