Chart Art: GBP/CAD Nears Key Long-Term Trend Support

Forex

Technical Analysis

Summary:

GBP/CAD just threw down a big red candlestick after tagging new 2025 highs! Is this just a breather or the start of a longer-term downswing?

GBP/CAD just threw down a big red candlestick after tagging new 2025 highs!

Is this just a breather or the start of a longer-term downswing?

We’re eyeing a major support zone that could decide whether the bulls step back in or call it a day.

GBP/CAD: Daily

GBP/CAD Daily Forex Chart

Sterling slipped across the board after traders started doubting whether Chancellor Reeves still had solid backing from the government, especially after it watered down benefit cuts she had championed to balance the budget.

At the same time, the Canadian dollar drew strength from rising oil prices, growing hopes for Fed rate cuts, and fresh optimism over U.S. trade deals.

Was this the start of a longer-term slide for GBP/CAD, or just a temporary stumble before the bulls regroup?

Remember that directional biases and volatility conditions in market price are typically driven by fundamentals. If you haven’t yet done your homework on the British pound and the Canadian dollar, then it’s time to check out the economic calendar and stay updated on daily fundamental news!

GBP/CAD is closing in on the 1.8400 to 1.8500 zone, a key support area that lines up with the S1 Pivot Point at 1.8377, the 100 SMA, and a trend line that has kept sellers in check since January.

If buyers show up with hesitation wicks and green candlesticks, we could see a bounce from this trend line area and a possible move back toward 1.8800 or even fresh 2025 highs.

But if the bears break through with strong red candles and hold below the trend line, the pair could slide toward the S2 Pivot at 1.8079 or the 1.8000 psychological level. That kind of move might flip the longer-term uptrend on its head!

Whichever bias you end up trading, don’t forget to practice proper risk management and stay aware of top-tier catalysts that could influence overall market sentiment.

Source: BabyPips

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Bond

Tokyo’s Strategic Bond Move: Japan Eases Market Fears With Strong 30-Year Sale

Japan’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) pulled off a smoother-than-expected auction of 30-year government bonds on Thursday, calming market anxiety over potential turbulence in long-term debt markets. With a bid-to-cover ratio of 3.58—the highest since February—investor appetite for Japanese sovereign debt remained robust, despite recent global volatility in long-maturity bonds.

The auction’s tail (the difference between the average and lowest accepted price) came in at 0.31, down from 0.49 in June, reinforcing market confidence in the issuance process. The result came on the heels of last month’s MOF announcement to cut the issuance of long-dated bonds—a decision aimed at reducing upward pressure on yields amid rising concerns about fiscal sustainability.

Market Strategy: Advance Signaling Works

Analysts had anticipated stable demand given how well the auction was telegraphed. Westpac’s Martin Whetton called the result “not stellar, but good enough,” indicating that the positive outcome was largely baked into investor expectations. In effect, the auction served as a “buy-the-rumor, sell-the-fact” event, with Japanese bond futures holding losses and yields nudging slightly higher post-auction—30-year yields rose 2 basis points to 2.901%.

The result reflects a careful balancing act by Japanese authorities, who have managed to calm short-term volatility even as they face intense structural pressures from a globally synchronized rise in yields, especially in the U.S. and U.K.

Policy Context: Lower Supply, Softer BoJ Exit

The MOF’s decision to reduce long-term debt issuance by ¥3.2 trillion ($22 billion) through March 2026 has helped temper bond market fears. Meanwhile, the Bank of Japan has committed to slowing its bond purchase taper, a clear signal to avoid any abrupt tightening in domestic financial conditions.

Earlier this week, Japan also enjoyed relatively strong demand in its 10-year bond auction, setting the stage for Thursday’s success and boosting confidence in the market's ability to absorb debt issuance even as local institutional buyers—such as life insurers—pull back from long-dated maturities.

Political and Structural Risks Remain

Despite the positive auction outcome, underlying structural risks linger. The upcoming upper house election is introducing new fiscal uncertainties, with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba campaigning on ambitious economic promises, including a ¥1 quadrillion economy and wage hikes.

Policy chief Itsunori Onodera has already warned that Japan’s fiscal stance is under a “yellow alert,” suggesting that spending pressures could resurface regardless of recent market stability. This leaves the government with a narrow path: managing funding costs in the face of demographic pressures, rising interest rate norms globally, and a political environment prone to populist spending.

A Tactical Win in a Strategic Battle

Japan’s successful 30-year bond auction is a tactical victory in a broader fiscal challenge. While the Ministry of Finance and Bank of Japan have temporarily reassured investors with reduced supply and policy clarity, the structural task of maintaining long-term fiscal health in a low-growth, aging economy remains daunting.

As elections loom and the global rate environment remains uncertain, Tokyo’s ability to navigate the long end of its bond curve without triggering yield spikes or investor flight will continue to be tested.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

U.S. Reverses Chip Design Software Curbs in Key Shift on China Tech Policy

In a notable policy reversal, the Trump administration has removed export license requirements for U.S. companies selling chip design software to China. The move is part of a broader trade agreement finalized last week between Washington and Beijing that seeks to de-escalate tensions in the high-tech sector and restore critical supply chains.

The decision affects the world’s three leading providers of electronic design automation (EDA) tools—Synopsys Inc., Cadence Design Systems Inc., and Germany’s Siemens AG—all of whom had been subject to licensing restrictions imposed in May. Those curbs had disrupted commercial activities by requiring companies to seek prior U.S. government approval to sell to Chinese clients.

According to company statements, Siemens has already restored full access to its software for Chinese customers. Synopsys and Cadence are in the process of resuming services, signaling an immediate operational impact. The U.S. Commerce Department has not issued public comments on the change.

Part of a Broader Trade Deal Linking Tech and Resources

The easing of EDA software restrictions forms a key pillar of the new trade accord. In exchange, China has pledged to expedite export approvals for rare earth minerals, a vital input for electronics and defense industries. The agreement also includes U.S. permission for shipments of ethane and jet engines to China—two sectors previously facing increasing regulatory scrutiny.

This marks a strategic trade-off: the U.S. regains access to critical mineral flows and commercial stability for major tech firms, while China regains access to essential design tools for its semiconductor ambitions.

Reversing a Short-Lived But Symbolic Escalation

The May restrictions on EDA tool sales were part of a broader campaign by the Trump administration to curb China’s progress in advanced computing and artificial intelligence. They followed years of export controls on high-end chips and semiconductor manufacturing equipment. While short-lived, the EDA restrictions signaled a willingness to broaden the tech blockade to upstream, software-based chokepoints in the chip design process.

EDA tools are vital for the creation of everything from Nvidia’s most advanced GPUs to more basic analog components. Their importance lies in the fact that without access to tools from Synopsys, Cadence, and Siemens, China’s domestic chip industry would be severely hampered—even with physical manufacturing capacity.

Strategic Implications: Tech Detente or Tactical Pause?

The removal of these curbs is a significant gesture but may reflect a tactical pause more than a lasting detente. While the move benefits U.S. firms with significant exposure to China, such as Synopsys and Cadence, it also opens a narrow window for China’s semiconductor ecosystem to regain access to essential design software.

It remains unclear how long this policy stance will last, especially with political pressure mounting around national security and tech dominance. The balance of trade-offs—minerals for software—indicates that both sides are trying to stabilize a strategically fragile supply chain landscape without compromising on core security red lines.

A Reset in Tech Trade, Not a Repeal of Rivalry

The U.S. lifting of chip design software restrictions is a calculated concession in a broader trade agreement aimed at restoring a degree of cooperation in tech and critical resources. While the move brings temporary relief to both U.S. suppliers and Chinese buyers, the broader rivalry in semiconductors, AI, and digital sovereignty remains intact.

With the Biden-Trump policy continuum still evolving and technology remaining central to global economic power, this rollback signals more of a realignment than a retreat. The real test will be whether mutual access is preserved or re-constrained as broader geopolitical dynamics shift.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Commodity

Oil Pulls Back as Trade Momentum Meets Supply Uncertainty

Oil prices declined on Thursday following their biggest single-day gain in nearly two weeks. Brent crude hovered near $69 per barrel, and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) remained above $67, as market sentiment shifted from geopolitical risk to ongoing trade developments and the upcoming OPEC+ meeting.

President Donald Trump’s announcement of a new trade agreement with Vietnam—following similar deals with the UK and China—helped fuel Wednesday’s 3% oil price surge. The agreements come ahead of the July 9 deadline to finalize trade terms, easing investor fears of widespread tariff escalations that could dampen global energy demand.

However, analysts suggest the trade-driven rally may be short-lived as attention now pivots to OPEC+ negotiations, where the cartel is expected to raise production quotas in August.

OPEC+ Decision Looms Large Over Price Direction

Market participants are exercising caution ahead of Sunday’s OPEC+ meeting. The alliance, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, is widely expected to approve a substantial increase in output, responding to seasonal demand strength and recent supply constraints.

ING’s Head of Commodities Strategy, Warren Patterson, noted that while trade optimism gave oil prices a temporary lift, "the sustainability of this move will likely be short-lived" due to the market’s reluctance to build positions ahead of the U.S. holiday weekend and the OPEC+ decision.

Any aggressive supply expansion could offset recent gains driven by Middle East tensions and U.S. trade progress, making the weekend’s outcome a key inflection point for market direction into mid-July.

U.S. Inventory Trends Signal Mixed Fundamentals

On the supply side, the latest data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration revealed that nationwide crude inventories rose by 3.8 million barrels last week—marking the first increase since May. However, stockpiles at Cushing, Oklahoma—the primary U.S. oil hub—fell for the fourth consecutive week and are now at their lowest seasonal level since 2014.

This divergence highlights a complex demand picture. While national builds suggest some softening, regional draws and ongoing heat waves across the U.S. are propping up short-term consumption. The current driving season, coupled with elevated air conditioning usage, has lent support to gasoline and fuel demand.

Market Structure Reflects Lingering Tightness

Despite Thursday’s price decline, forward curves continue to signal underlying tightness. Brent’s prompt spread—the price gap between the nearest two contracts—rose to $1.21 per barrel in backwardation, up from $0.69 a month ago. Although this remains below the levels seen during last month’s Israel-Iran conflict, the structure still suggests strong prompt demand relative to future deliveries.

Backwardation in oil markets typically reflects supply constraints or heightened immediate demand, indicating that while macroeconomic risks linger, physical market dynamics remain firm.

Oil’s recent price action reflects the market’s balancing act between easing trade tensions and looming supply increases. While new U.S. trade deals have helped stabilize demand expectations, the potential for OPEC+ to flood the market with more barrels poses a fresh challenge for bulls.

With the U.S. holiday limiting trading volumes and OPEC+ poised to announce new production targets, investors are treading carefully. The outcome of the weekend’s meeting will likely define the direction of crude markets into the second half of July, as traders weigh geopolitical developments against the fundamentals of supply and demand.

Source: Bloomberg

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Stocks

Asian Markets Cautiously Advance Amid Critical U.S. Economic Developments

Asian equities moved modestly higher on Thursday as investors turned their attention to two key U.S. events: the June payrolls report and the congressional vote on President Donald Trump’s sweeping tax and spending bill. These developments are expected to shape near-term expectations for Federal Reserve policy and broader market sentiment.

The MSCI Asia-Pacific index (excluding Japan) edged up 0.2%, nearing a four-year high, while Japan’s Nikkei remained flat. In China, blue-chip stocks added 0.2%, but Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index slipped 0.6% following weaker-than-expected growth in China’s services sector, which expanded at its slowest pace in nine months.

Wall Street Rallies on Vietnam Trade Deal, Eyes India Next

U.S. equity markets closed at record highs after Trump announced a trade agreement with Vietnam, which includes a 20% tariff on exports to the U.S. The move was interpreted as part of a broader push to finalize trade pacts with key Asian economies, with India reportedly next in line.

This momentum lifted hopes that trade clarity might buffer recent global volatility. S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures were little changed in Asia, signaling that investors are in wait-and-see mode ahead of the critical U.S. labor data.

U.S. Jobs Data: A Key Test for Fed Policy Expectations

The U.S. nonfarm payrolls report, due later today, is the central risk event. Economists forecast a gain of 110,000 jobs for June and an increase in the unemployment rate to 4.3%. However, a surprise contraction in private sector payrolls earlier this week has raised fears of a more pronounced labor market slowdown.

According to IG analyst Tony Sycamore, if the jobless rate spikes to 4.4%—its highest since October 2021—it could significantly increase the likelihood of a July rate cut, with probabilities climbing toward 70%. Current market pricing implies only a 25% chance of a July cut.

The Federal Reserve has not lowered interest rates in 2025 despite pressure from President Trump, who continues to demand aggressive easing. On Wednesday, he reiterated his call for Fed Chair Jerome Powell to resign and repeated his view that rates should be slashed to 1%, down from the current 4.25%–4.50% target.

Bond Yields and the Dollar Reflect Policy Tensions

U.S. Treasury yields fell slightly ahead of the data. The 10-year yield dipped 2 basis points to 4.265%, while the 2-year yield dropped to 3.77%. These modest declines reflect market hesitancy, as a weaker-than-expected jobs print could trigger a sharper repricing in rate expectations.

The U.S. dollar remains under pressure amid mounting political criticism of the Fed’s independence. The Bloomberg Dollar Index has slipped to its lowest level in over three years. The euro inched up 0.1% to $1.1807, nearing a four-year high, while the British pound also gained 0.1% after heavy losses the previous day.

UK markets remain volatile after the government’s reversal on welfare reforms sparked concerns about fiscal stability. Gilt yields spiked nearly 23 basis points at one point—the sharpest jump since October 2022.

Oil, Gold Ease After Volatile Moves

Oil prices retreated slightly after surging 3% overnight on geopolitical tensions. U.S. crude fell 0.4% to $67.20 per barrel, while Brent dipped to $68.84. The overnight spike was triggered by Iran’s decision to halt cooperation with the U.N. nuclear agency, adding a layer of supply risk to energy markets.

Gold slipped 0.4% to $3,342 an ounce, following recent gains driven by fiscal and inflation uncertainties.

Thursday’s trading session encapsulates a moment of global market tension. The combination of a potentially soft U.S. labor report and a controversial tax bill could redefine monetary policy expectations and shape asset flows. While equities are holding up on hopes for policy stimulus and international trade progress, downside risks persist if data disappoints or fiscal dynamics further unsettle bond markets.

Investors are navigating a narrow path, balancing short-term optimism with the structural concerns of inflation, central bank credibility, and rising public debt. The U.S. payrolls report could be the catalyst that tips sentiment one way or the other.

Souce: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

AustralianSuper Strengthens Private Equity Push With New Partnerships

AustralianSuper, the country’s largest pension fund managing over A$365 billion (US$240 billion), is intensifying its commitment to private equity. The fund is on track to onboard four new private equity managers by the end of 2025, according to Mark Delaney, the fund’s Chief Investment Officer. This strategic pivot is part of a broader push to increase exposure to unlisted assets amid subdued capital raising activity and persistent market volatility.

Delaney emphasized that these new partnerships are with managers the AustralianSuper team has worked with previously and who have consistently delivered returns through conventional private equity strategies. While specific names were not disclosed, the selection appears grounded in trust, familiarity, and proven track records—factors critical in private market investing.

New York Expansion Supports Global Private Equity Strategy

AustralianSuper’s growing presence in the U.S., particularly through its New York office, has been pivotal in facilitating access to high-quality private equity relationships. The office now has around 60 staff, several of whom are focused on strengthening partnerships with private market firms. Delaney confirmed that his recent visits to New York included direct meetings with prospective private equity managers.

The timing of these deals is strategic. Delaney noted that capital raising in the private equity space is currently low—a condition that historically produces strong returns for investors who commit during these quieter periods. This view aligns with the fund’s philosophy of investing counter-cyclically, capitalizing on opportunities when market enthusiasm is tempered.

Shift From Listed to Unlisted Assets Amid Tech-Heavy Market Bias

AustralianSuper has faced challenges in its listed equities portfolio this year, largely due to the outsized performance of the so-called “Magnificent Seven” mega-cap tech stocks, which skewed global equity returns. The fund’s diversified investment approach, which does not overweight individual high-growth sectors, underperformed in this environment. However, Delaney remains confident in the long-term benefits of broad-based diversification.

In May, the fund signaled its intent to increase the private equity allocation of its balanced investment option from 5% to potentially 8%. This recalibration reflects both a tactical response to near-term equity market imbalances and a structural shift toward long-horizon, illiquid asset classes.

Tariff Volatility Doesn’t Derail Equity Exposure

Despite trade-related market turbulence triggered by President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs and continued global uncertainty, Delaney stated that AustralianSuper does not plan to reduce its equity exposure. While acknowledging that tariffs are expected to slow U.S. growth and compress corporate earnings, he noted that consensus forecasts stop short of predicting a recession.

“We don’t think it’s enough for us to go underweight stocks,” Delaney explained, suggesting that the current environment still supports a neutral-to-positive equity allocation over the long term.

Strategic Rebalancing to Navigate Market Complexity

AustralianSuper’s expanding focus on private equity marks a calculated pivot toward stability and long-term performance in a fragmented global market. With four new private equity manager deals in progress and a deepening footprint in the U.S., the fund is positioning itself to capitalize on low fundraising cycles and diversify away from the volatility of listed markets.

This move, set against a backdrop of trade tensions and sectoral concentration in public equities, reflects AustralianSuper’s evolving investment strategy—one that blends disciplined risk management with targeted asset class expansion to safeguard and grow member wealth over decades.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Grace Montgomery

Republicans in the House of Representatives on Wednesday struggled to pass President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill as a handful of hardliners withheld their support over concerns about its cost.

As lawmakers shuttled in and out of closed-door meetings, House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was trying to convince the holdouts to back Trump's signature bill, telling reporters, "We are planning on a vote today."

With a narrow 220-212 majority, Johnson can afford no more than three defections from his ranks, and sceptics from the party's right flank said they had more than enough votes to block the bill.

“He knows I am a ‘no’. He knows that I don't believe there are the votes to pass this rule the way it is,” Republican Representative Andy Harris of Maryland, leader of the hardline Freedom Caucus, told reporters.

Trump, who is pressing lawmakers to get him the bill to sign into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, met with some of the dissenters at the White House. But with the outcome uncertain, Republican leaders delayed a procedural vote for hours as they worked to shore up support.

The Senate passed the legislation, which nonpartisan analysts say will add US$3.4 trillion to the nation's US$36.2 trillion in debt over the next decade, by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday after intense debate on the bill's hefty price tag and US$900 million in cuts to the Medicaid healthcare programme for low-income Americans.

Representative Lisa McClain, who chairs the House Republican Conference, told Reuters she expected her colleagues to work through procedural votes and bring the bill to a vote before the full House on Wednesday night.

“I think we will put it on the floor tonight. It may be 10 or 11 o'clock," McClain said.

Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, saying that its tax breaks disproportionately benefit the wealthy while cutting services that lower- and middle-income Americans rely on. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that almost 12 million people could lose health insurance as a result of the bill.

"This bill is catastrophic. It is not policy, it is punishment," Democratic Representative Jim McGovern said in debate on the House floor.

Trump effect

Republicans in Congress have struggled to stay united in recent years, but they also have not defied Trump since he returned to the White House in January.

Representative Chip Roy of Texas was leading three holdouts who have raised concerns about increasing the deficit and high levels of spending.

Asked why he expects the bill to pass, Republican Representative Derrick Van Orden told reporters: “Because 77 million Americans voted for Donald Trump, not Chip Roy. That's why.”

Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, which would make it all but impossible to meet the July 4 deadline.

The legislation contains most of Trump's top domestic priorities, from tax cuts to immigration enforcement.

The bill would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, cut health and food safety net programmes, fund Trump's immigration crackdown, and zero out many green-energy incentives. It also includes a US$5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months or risk a devastating default.

The Medicaid cuts have also raised concerns among some Republicans, prompting the Senate to set aside more money for rural hospitals.