• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Trending
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
BID
ASK
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6870.39
6870.39
6870.39
6895.79
6858.28
+13.27
+ 0.19%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
47954.98
47954.98
47954.98
48133.54
47871.51
+104.05
+ 0.22%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23578.12
23578.12
23578.12
23680.03
23506.00
+72.99
+ 0.31%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
98.880
98.960
98.880
98.960
98.730
-0.070
-0.07%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.16521
1.16528
1.16521
1.16717
1.16341
+0.00095
+ 0.08%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.33260
1.33268
1.33260
1.33462
1.33136
-0.00052
-0.04%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4205.77
4206.18
4205.77
4218.85
4190.61
+7.86
+ 0.19%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
59.278
59.308
59.278
60.084
59.273
-0.531
-0.89%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

Ivory Coast 2025/26 Cocoa Arrivals Reached 803000 T By December 7 Versus 820000 T A Year Ago - Exporters' Estimate

Share

EU To Delay Proposals For Automotive Sector, Including Co2 Emissions, To Dec 16, Draft EU Commission Document Shows

Share

Kremlin: India Buys Energy Where It Is Profitable To And As Far As We Understand They Will Continue To Do That

Share

Turkey's Main Banking Index Up 2.5%

Share

Turkey's Main BIST-100 Index Up 1.9%

Share

Hungary's Preliminary November Budget Balance Huf -403 Billion

Share

Indian Rupee Down 0.1% At 90.07 Per USA Dollar As Of 3:30 P.M. Ist, Previous Close 89.98

Share

India's Nifty 50 Index Provisionally Ends 0.96% Lower

Share

[JPMorgan: US Stock Rally May Stagnate Following Fed Rate Cut] JPMorgan Strategists Say The Recent Rally In US Stocks May Stall As Investors Take Profits Following The Anticipated Fed Rate Cut. The Market Currently Predicts A 92% Probability Of The Fed Lowering Borrowing Costs On Wednesday. Expectations Of A Rate Cut Have Continued To Rise, Fueled By Positive Signals From Policymakers In Recent Weeks. "Investors May Be More Inclined To Lock In Gains At The End Of The Year Rather Than Increase Directional Exposure," Mislav Matejka's Team Wrote In A Report

Share

Russian Defence Ministry: Russian Forces Take Control Of Novodanylivka In Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia Region

Share

Russian Defence Ministry: Russian Forces Take Control Of Chervone In Ukraine's Donetsk Region

Share

French Finance Ministry: Government Started Process To Block Temporarily Shein Platform

Share

Finance Minister: Indonesia To Impose Coal Export Tax Of Up To 5% Next Year

Share

[Trump Considering Fired Homeland Security Secretary Noem? White House Denies] According To Reports From US Media Outlets Such As The Daily Beast And The UK's Independent, The White House Has Denied Reports That US President Trump Is Considering Firing Homeland Security Secretary Noem. White House Spokesperson Abigail Jackson Posted On Social Media On The 7th Local Time, Calling The Claims "fake News" And Stating That "Secretary Noem Has Done An Excellent Job Implementing The President's Agenda And 'making America Safe Again'."

Share

HKEX: Standard Chartered Bought Back 571604 Total Shares On Other Exchanges For Gbp9.5 Million On Dec 5

Share

Morgan Stanley Reiterates Bullish Outlook On US Stocks Due To Fed Rate Cut Expectations. Morgan Stanley Strategists Believe That The US Stock Market Faces A "bullish Outlook" Given Improved Earnings Expectations And Anticipated Fed Rate Cuts. They Expect Strong Corporate Earnings By 2026, And Anticipate The Fed Will Cut Rates Based On Lagging Or Mildly Weak Labor Markets. They Expect The US Consumer Discretionary Sector And Small-cap Stocks To Continue To Outperform

Share

China's National Development And Reform Commission Announced That Starting From 24:00 On December 8, The Retail Price Limit For Gasoline And Diesel In China Will Be Reduced By 55 Yuan Per Ton, Which Translates To A Reduction Of 0.04 Yuan Per Liter For 92-octane Gasoline, 0.05 Yuan Per Liter For 95-octane Gasoline, And 0.05 Yuan Per Liter For 0# Diesel

Share

Tkms CEO: US Security Strategy Highlights Need For Europe To Take Care Of Its Own Defences

Share

USA S&P 500 E-Mini Futures Up 0.1%, NASDAQ 100 Futures Up 0.18%, Dow Futures Down 0.02%

Share

London Metal Exchange (LME): Copper Inventories Increased By 2,000 Tons, Aluminum Inventories Decreased By 2,500 Tons, Nickel Inventories Increased By 228 Tons, Zinc Inventories Increased By 2,375 Tons, Lead Inventories Decreased By 3,725 Tons, And Tin Inventories Decreased By 10 Tons

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
France Industrial Output MoM (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --
France Trade Balance (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Euro Zone Employment YoY (SA) (Q3)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Canada Part-Time Employment (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Unemployment Rate (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Full-time Employment (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Labor Force Participation Rate (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada Employment (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Personal Income MoM (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Core PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PCE Price Index YoY (SA) (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Core PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Personal Outlays MoM (SA) (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. 5-10 Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Real Personal Consumption Expenditures MoM (Sept)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Consumer Credit (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --
China, Mainland Foreign Exchange Reserves (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Trade Balance (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Japan Nominal GDP Revised QoQ (Q3)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Imports YoY (CNH) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Exports (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Imports (CNH) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Trade Balance (CNH) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Exports YoY (USD) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Imports YoY (USD) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany Industrial Output MoM (SA) (Oct)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Euro Zone Sentix Investor Confidence Index (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada National Economic Confidence Index

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. BRC Like-For-Like Retail Sales YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. BRC Overall Retail Sales YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Overnight (Borrowing) Key Rate

--

F: --

P: --

RBA Rate Statement
RBA Press Conference
Germany Exports MoM (SA) (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. NFIB Small Business Optimism Index (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Mexico 12-Month Inflation (CPI) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Mexico Core CPI YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Mexico PPI YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Redbook Index YoY

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. JOLTS Job Openings (SA) (Oct)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland M1 Money Supply YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland M0 Money Supply YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland M2 Money Supply YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Short-Term Crude Production Forecast For The Year (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Natural Gas Production Forecast For The Next Year (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. EIA Short-Term Crude Production Forecast For The Next Year (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

EIA Monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook
U.S. API Weekly Gasoline Stocks

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. API Weekly Cushing Crude Oil Stocks

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. API Weekly Crude Oil Stocks

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. API Weekly Refined Oil Stocks

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea Unemployment Rate (SA) (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Reuters Tankan Non-Manufacturers Index (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Reuters Tankan Manufacturers Index (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Domestic Enterprise Commodity Price Index MoM (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Domestic Enterprise Commodity Price Index YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland PPI YoY (Nov)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    Connecting
    .
    .
    .
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          Benefits and Risks of Using AI in Trading

          Glendon

          Economic

          Summary:

          Explore the transformative impact of AI in trading. Learn about its benefits, including speed and precision, alongside the risks like over-reliance and algorithmic biases.

          Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized industries worldwide, and trading is no exception. From executing trades in milliseconds to analyzing vast datasets, AI has become an indispensable tool for modern traders. However, with its advantages come significant risks. This article delves into the benefits and risks of using AI in trading, helping you understand its potential and pitfalls.

          The Benefits of Using AI in Trading

          1. Speed and Efficiency

          AI algorithms can execute trades within milliseconds, seizing opportunities that humans would likely miss. This speed is particularly beneficial in high-frequency trading (HFT), where even microsecond delays can impact profitability.

          2. Data Analysis and Pattern Recognition

          AI excels at analyzing massive datasets in real-time, identifying patterns and trends that may not be apparent to human traders. This capability allows for more informed decision-making and accurate predictions.

          3. Automation of Trading Strategies

          AI enables traders to automate their strategies through machine learning models. Once programmed, these algorithms can function independently, executing trades based on predefined parameters.

          4. Reduced Emotional Bias

          Human traders are often influenced by emotions like fear and greed, which can lead to poor decisions. AI, being emotionless, operates purely based on data and logic, reducing the impact of psychological factors.

          5. Accessibility to Retail Traders

          What was once the domain of large financial institutions is now accessible to retail traders. AI-powered tools and platforms provide everyday traders with advanced analytics, leveling the playing field.

          The Risks of Using AI in Trading

          1. Over-Reliance on Algorithms

          Relying solely on AI can be risky. Algorithms are only as good as the data they are trained on and the scenarios they are programmed to handle. Unexpected market events can lead to significant losses.

          2. Algorithmic Bias

          AI systems can inherit biases present in the data they are trained on. This can lead to skewed analyses or decisions, especially if the data is incomplete or unrepresentative of market dynamics.

          3. Lack of Transparency

          Many AI models operate as "black boxes," meaning their decision-making processes are not easily interpretable. Traders may find it challenging to understand why an algorithm made a particular trade, leading to potential mistrust or misuse.

          4. Market Volatility

          AI-driven trading can contribute to market volatility. Algorithms acting on similar triggers may execute massive trades simultaneously, leading to sudden market shifts.

          5. Security and Ethical Concerns

          AI systems are susceptible to hacking and manipulation. Additionally, ethical concerns arise when AI is used to exploit market inefficiencies at the expense of retail traders.

          Real-World Applications of AI in Trading

          High-Frequency Trading (HFT): AI is widely used in HFT to execute large numbers of orders within fractions of a second.
          Portfolio Management: Robo-advisors use AI to create and manage investment portfolios tailored to individual goals.
          Risk Management: AI assesses market risks and provides alerts or adjustments to trading strategies.
          Sentiment Analysis: AI analyzes news, social media, and other sources to gauge market sentiment and predict trends.

          Striking a Balance: How to Mitigate Risks

          Understand the Algorithms: Traders should have a clear understanding of the AI models they use and their limitations.
          Diversify Strategies: Relying solely on AI can be risky; combining it with traditional analysis adds robustness.
          Regular Monitoring: Continuously evaluate the performance of AI systems and make necessary adjustments.
          Stay Updated: Keep up with advancements in AI and trading to ensure your tools remain effective.
          Collaborate with Experts: Work with data scientists and AI specialists to ensure your systems are optimized.

          Conclusion

          AI in trading offers remarkable benefits, including speed, efficiency, and advanced analytics. However, these advantages come with risks such as over-reliance, algorithmic biases, and ethical concerns. To leverage AI effectively, traders must understand its capabilities and limitations, blending it with traditional trading strategies for a balanced approach.
          As AI continues to evolve, its role in trading will undoubtedly expand. By staying informed and cautious, traders can harness the power of AI while minimizing potential pitfalls, paving the way for smarter and more efficient trading.
          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          What is the Best Chart for Finance

          Glendon

          Economic

          The financial world is all about interpreting and presenting complex data in a meaningful way. Choosing the right chart is critical to conveying insights effectively, whether you’re analyzing stock prices, comparing revenues, or forecasting economic trends. But with so many chart types available, how do you determine the best one for your specific financial needs?
          This article explores the most commonly used financial charts, their advantages, and the ideal scenarios for each.

          1. Line Charts: For Tracking Trends Over Time

          Best for:
          Stock price trendsRevenue growthInterest rate changes
          Why it works: Line charts are simple yet powerful. They connect data points with a continuous line, making it easy to spot trends over time. For instance, tracking the stock price of Apple over a year can be clearly visualized with a line chart.
          Example:A line chart showing Tesla's quarterly revenue growth from 2020 to 2024.
          Key Tip: Use line charts for datasets with clear, continuous progression over time.

          2. Candlestick Charts: For Stock Market Analysis

          Best for:
          Analyzing daily stock price movementsIdentifying market trends and reversals
          Why it works:Candlestick charts provide detailed insights into stock trading, including the opening, closing, high, and low prices. Their color-coded format makes it easy to spot bullish or bearish patterns.
          Example:A candlestick chart highlighting Microsoft’s stock performance during a volatile market period.
          Key Tip: Combine with technical indicators like moving averages for more comprehensive analysis.

          3. Bar Charts: For Comparisons

          Best for:
          Comparing quarterly earnings across companiesHighlighting expenses vs. revenue
          Why it works: Bar charts are ideal for making comparisons between categories. For example, comparing the quarterly net income of five top companies in the tech sector becomes intuitive with this chart.
          Example:A bar chart comparing Amazon, Google, and Meta’s advertising revenues in 2023.
          Key Tip: Ensure proper scaling and avoid overcrowding to maintain clarity.

          4. Pie Charts: For Proportions

          Best for:
          Breaking down a budgetVisualizing market share distribution
          Why it works: Pie charts excel at showing proportions in a dataset. For example, a company’s revenue sources (products, services, subscriptions) can be easily illustrated.
          Example: A pie chart showing the market share of smartphone brands in 2024.
          Key Tip: Limit categories to 5-7 slices to avoid a cluttered appearance.

          5. Scatter Plots: For Correlations

          Best for:
          Examining relationships between variables (e.g., revenue vs. marketing spend)Identifying outliers
          Why it works:Scatter plots reveal patterns and correlations, such as the relationship between advertising budget and sales revenue.
          Example:A scatter plot showing the correlation between GDP growth and stock market performance in emerging economies.
          Key Tip: Use trend lines to highlight the nature of the correlation (positive, negative, or none).

          6. Heat Maps: For Large Datasets

          Best for:
          Analyzing sector performance in stock marketsIdentifying geographical revenue trends
          Why it works: Heat maps use color intensity to represent values, making them ideal for summarizing large datasets.
          Example: A heat map showing sector-wise stock performance on the S&P 500 during a trading day.
          Key Tip: Use a clear color gradient to differentiate data ranges effectively.

          7. Area Charts: For Cumulative Trends

          Best for:
          Showing cumulative growth over time
          Visualizing multiple datasets
          Why it works: Area charts add a layer of emphasis by filling the space below the line, making cumulative trends more apparent.
          Example: An area chart illustrating the total market cap of cryptocurrencies over the last five years.
          Key Tip: Avoid using more than three layers to maintain readability.

          Data-Driven Insights: Which Chart Is the Best?

          The best chart for finance depends on your data and the story you want to tell. Here’s a quick guide:
          For trends over time: Line or area charts.
          For market analysis: Candlestick charts.
          For comparisons: Bar charts.
          For proportions: Pie charts.
          For correlations: Scatter plots.
          For large datasets: Heat maps.

          Conclusion

          Choosing the right financial chart is both an art and a science. By understanding your dataset and audience, you can create visuals that effectively communicate insights and drive decision-making. Experiment with different chart types to discover what resonates best with your data.
          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Week Ahead – RBNZ to Slash Rates Ahead of US and Eurozone Inflation Data

          XM

          Central Bank

          Economic

          RBNZ set for third rate cut

          The Reserve Bank of New Zealand will kick-start the end of year policy meetings of the major central banks when it announces its decision on Wednesday. Having stood out as being ultra-hawkish during the global tightening cycle, the RBNZ performed a major policy reversal over the summer by embarking on a loosening campaign even before the Fed had started its own.
          With the annual rate of CPI falling within its 1-3% target band, inflation expectations settling around 2.0% and GDP growth remaining sluggish, policymakers have little reason to be cautious and a back-to-back 50-basis point cut is fully priced in. There is even speculation that the RBNZ might opt for a triple reduction of 75 basis points, which can be justified by the fact that, after November, policymakers won’t meet again until February.
          Week Ahead – RBNZ to Slash Rates Ahead of US and Eurozone Inflation Data_1
          Should the RBNZ surprise with a hefty cut, it will be difficult for the New Zealand dollar to regain its footing against the US dollar, and it could tumble to fresh 2024 lows.

          Storm of US data before Thanksgiving break

          The US economic agenda will get back into full gear next week as a flurry of releases are on the way before traders abandon their desks for the Thanksgiving holiday. Politics briefly eclipsed monetary policy after Donald Trump’s shock election win. But the focus is primarily back on the Fed now amid growing doubts about how many times the US central bank will be able to cut rates even before the incoming administration’s inflationary policies have seen the light of day.
          Expectations of a 25-bps reduction in December currently stand at between 60% and 55% as Fed officials have turned more hawkish after a string of upbeat indicators on the economy, but more importantly, after the decline in underlying inflation stalled again.
          Fed Char Powell has joined the FOMC’s hawkish camp, flagging the possibility of a pause. Hence, the likelihood of a cut will depend on how strong or weak the next inflation and jobs reports are before the December meeting.
          The PCE inflation report, out on Wednesday, is up first on the schedule. Powell recently said he sees core PCE edging up from 2.7% to 2.8% in October, which would mark a setback for the Fed. The projection for headline PCE is a pickup from 2.1% to 2.3%.
          Week Ahead – RBNZ to Slash Rates Ahead of US and Eurozone Inflation Data_2
          Both the headline measures of PCE and CPI inflation have maintained a clearer downward path than the core readings, and if the incoming numbers do not throw this trend into question, the Fed might still have some manoeuvrability to trim rates in December.

          Fed minutes also in the spotlight

          Should the PCE price indices fail to shed any light on the Fed’s next move, investors will look to the minutes of the Fed’s November policy meeting due the same day for fresh policy insight. There will also be plenty of other data to sift through on Wednesday. Personal income and consumption will be quite important, followed by durable goods orders for October and the second estimate of Q3 GDP growth.
          A day earlier, new home sales and the Conference Board’s consumer confidence gauge are likely to attract some attention too. US markets will be shut on Thursday for Thanksgiving Day and the stock market will close early on Friday, which means there will only be light trading. Nevertheless, those choosing not to make a weekend of it will have the Chicago PMI to keep them entertained.
          The US dollar has been extending its post-election rally over the past week. But its gains are now looking overstretched. Any disappointing data therefore risks triggering a sharp correction.

          Eurozone CPI eyed for ECB clues

          Despite rising pessimism about the European growth outlook, ECB policymakers have been pushing back on investor expectations of a 50-bps rate cut in December. The recent jump in negotiated wages – a key metric for the ECB – and services inflation continuing to hover around 4% underline policymakers’ concerns about cutting too fast.
          Markets have assigned about a 25% probability for a 50-bps move in December, which may be overstating the true odds if the latest ECB rhetoric is to be believed. This implies there’s quite a mountain to climb to push the chances for a 50-bps cut substantially higher.
          Nevertheless, Friday’s flash CPI figures will be watched closely. In October, headline CPI accelerated from 1.7% to 2.0%. A further increase to 2.4% is forecast for November, which could dash hopes for a larger cut even more, potentially helping the euro to stop the recent bleeding against the greenback.
          Week Ahead – RBNZ to Slash Rates Ahead of US and Eurozone Inflation Data_3
          Ahead of the CPI numbers, Monday’s Ifo business survey out of Germany will be on investors’ radar amid worries about how the political uncertainty in the country is affecting business confidence.

          Will CPI data worsen the aussie’s pain?

          In Australia, the latest CPI stats will also be doing the rounds. The monthly readings for October are due on Wednesday, while on Thursday, Q3 capital expenditure data will be monitored. Annual inflation fell to 2.1% in September, which is at the lower end of the RBA’s 2-3% target band. Yet, the RBA is not ready to start taking its foot off the brake, and investors don’t foresee a rate cut before May 2025 at the earliest.
          If CPI edges up to 2.3% in October as expected, there might be some support for the Australian dollar versus its stronger US counterpart.
          Week Ahead – RBNZ to Slash Rates Ahead of US and Eurozone Inflation Data_4

          Loonie turns attention to Canadian GDP

          Another currency struggling to keep its head above water is the Canadian dollar. The Bank of Canada has been more aggressive than other central banks in slashing rates, and this explains why the loonie is the third worst performing major currency this year.
          A fifth consecutive rate cut is likely in December but bets for a second 50-bps cut faded after the recent hotter-than-expected CPI report. Friday’s Q3 GDP print will probably not be a game changer for the BoC, but there could still be a sizeable reaction in the loonie from any big surprises.

          Tokyo inflation on tap

          Adding to Friday’s data barrage are the Tokyo CPI figures for November. Inflation in Tokyo fell below the Bank of Japan’s 2.0% target in October, but this hasn’t dissuaded policymakers from wanting to raise interest rates further. The question now is more about the timing. With investors split 50-50 about the possibility of a rate increase in December, stronger-than-forecast numbers could bolster bets for a year-end hike, lifting the yen.
          Week Ahead – RBNZ to Slash Rates Ahead of US and Eurozone Inflation Data_5

          Source:XM

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          ESG Unpacked: Regulatory Frameworks Shaping Sustainable Investing

          JanusHenderson

          Economic

          What is driving ESG regulation?

          The spotlight on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors has never been brighter, yet the path to fully integrating these considerations into investment strategies is fraught with challenges, highlighting not only the demand for such data but also the glaring gaps in its availability. At the heart of the issue lies different regional interpretations surrounding ESG terminology, which has left investors clamouring for reliable data on financially material ESG factors that can influence cash flows, cost of capital, repayment, and ultimately, valuation. The increasing focus on weaving financially material ESG considerations into the fabric of investment processes.
          The scarcity of reported data, coupled with fragmented and ever evolving methodologies for disclosing data and metrics, exacerbates the complexity of this endeavour. This challenge is further magnified by the vast range of ESG factors and the varying degrees of their materiality across different sectors. Companies, striving to manage risk, echo this demand for clarity and uniformity in ESG data, particularly within their supply chains. Similarly, asset owners are keen to understand how their portfolios align with their ESG objectives, seeking transparency and accountability in how these goals are achieved.
          In response, governments, regulators, non-regulatory working groups and standard setters are stepping forward to bridge the gap, crafting policy, frameworks and regulations designed to ensure that investors gain access to the company and portfolio data they require. This evolving regulatory landscape signifies a pivotal shift towards more informed and sustainable investment practices, promising to reshape how investors navigate the complexities of ESG integration.
          This article aims to unpack the alphabet soup of financial ESG regulation, with a focus on how key and often overlapping global rules intersect to enhance corporate accountability for sustainability disclosure, reporting and due diligence to better inform investors’ decisions.

          Bridging the gap: How regulatory efforts are unifying ESG standards

          The European Green Deal represents a holistic approach by the European Union (EU) to address climate change and promote sustainability while ensuring economic growth. The Deal is supported by a robust Sustainable Finance Framework including: the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) – underpinned by the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, and the EU Taxonomy.
          These regulations, although designed to function in concert, exhibit some divergence in focus and application that have implications for companies and investors looking to navigate the evolving landscape of ESG-related reporting vital to mitigating investment risks, while capitalising on new opportunities.
          CSRD aims to expand sustainability reporting, requiring companies to disclose their impact on climate, plus policy on human rights and governance, where material. A key component of the regulation is Companies will need to provide detailed auditable reporting on Sustainability Matters considered material to that assessment.
          SFDR focuses on preventing greenwashing by mandating disclosures about how financial products consider sustainability risks and their impacts on ESG factors. It applies to financial institutions and includes both organisation-level and product-level reporting requirements.
          CSDDD emphasises corporate responsibility in mitigating adverse environmental and human rights impacts. It mandates thorough due diligence processes across a company’s operations and value chain, setting a more explicit framework for ethical corporate conduct.
          EU Taxonomy is a classification system that helps companies and investors identify “environmentally sustainable” economic activities to make sustainable investment decisions.

          ESG regulations: harmony and divergence

          While these regulations share the goal of enhancing corporate accountability for their ecological and social impacts, they diverge in their applicability thresholds and specific requirements, leading to potential market confusion. However, their combined effect is to provide a more comprehensive framework for ESG reporting.
          The CSRD and CSDDD overlap significantly, particularly in their emphasis on detailed planning to mitigate adverse impacts. However, the CSDDD goes further by mandating active management of these impacts and introducing stakeholder enforcement mechanisms through the courts.
          Meanwhile, SFDR complements these by addressing the financial sector’s role, setting standards for how sustainability risks are integrated into investment decisions and disclosed to investors, with the aim to reduce greenwashing.
          These regulations collectively bridge significant gaps in ESG-related reporting, offering clearer guidance for investors and companies. Despite some divergence in their specific mandates, together they form a coherent framework that enhances transparency, accountability, and responsible investment, guiding investors and companies towards more sustainable practices (Figure 1).
          ESG Unpacked: Regulatory Frameworks Shaping Sustainable Investing_1
          In a significant move aimed at enhancing transparency around the environmental impact of companies, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted new rules on 6 March 2024, mandating climate-related disclosures in public companies’ annual reports and registration statements. This initiative, however, has not been without controversy, facing numerous legal challenges that have led to a temporary stay on its implementation. Despite these hurdles, the move underscores a global shift towards greater corporate accountability in environmental sustainability, aligning with similar initiatives in California and the EU’s CSRD.
          The SEC rule aims to provide investors with detailed information on how climate-related risks and sustainability factors affect public companies. Key disclosure requirements include material climate-related risks, strategies, targets, governance, and the financial impacts of severe weather events and natural conditions. For larger firms, (indirect) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disclosures are mandated, subject to third-party validation. These requirements, scaled back from the original proposal, are based on the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the global GHG Protocol, yet the SEC created its own standards rather than adopting an existing framework outright.

          Climate disclosure: California turns up the heat

          In 2023, California passed Senate Bills 253 and 261, which were recently combined to form the Senate Bill 219, Greenhouse Gases: Climate Corporate Accountability: Climate-Related Financial Risk (SB-219) alongside the Assembly Bill 1305, introducing its own climate disclosure mandates. While there is overlap with the SEC rule in areas such as GHG emissions reporting including Scope 1 and 2 emissions (beginning in 2026), the California laws uniquely require disclosure regardless of financial materiality and also include (beginning in 2027).
          The state laws and the SEC rule diverge significantly in their approach to materiality and the breadth of required disclosures, with California’s legislation taking a more expansive stance on what . California’s climate disclosure rules apply to public and private businesses operating in the state with more than US$1 billion in revenue.

          Materiality matters

          The CSRD represents the EU’s ambitious effort to integrate sustainability reporting within the corporate disclosure regime. It introduces the concept of ‘double materiality’.
          This approach is broader than the SEC’s focus on materiality from an investor’s perspective (’financial materiality’), and other regulators globally, requiring companies in scope of CSRD to disclose a wider range of information.
          The CSRD also mandates reporting on sustainability impacts, risks, and opportunities across a company’s value chain, covering a broader array of sustainability topics beyond climate, such as water use, biodiversity, and circular economy practices.

          Cross-border complexities

          Companies operating across jurisdictions face the challenge of navigating these varied and sometimes conflicting disclosure requirements.
          The SEC’s focus on materiality from an investor’s perspective, California’s more expansive disclosure mandates, and the EU’s comprehensive approach under the CSRD illustrate the complexities of the current regulatory landscape.
          Whilst regulators are considering some adjustments to reduce complexity and facilitate a partial interoperability, such as the integration of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) frameworks by various jurisdictions, organisations must develop cross-regulatory reporting strategies that address these regional differences.

          Clarity, consistency, and comparability

          The evolution of ESG disclosure regulations reflects a growing recognition of the critical importance of environmental sustainability in corporate governance. As companies grapple with these new requirements, the need for clarity, consistency, and comparability in disclosures becomes increasingly apparent.
          The SEC’s initiative, despite its current legal uncertainties, along with California’s laws and the EU’s CSRD, signal a significant shift towards a more sustainable and transparent corporate world.
          The path forward requires careful navigation of an increasingly diverse and evolving regulatory landscape. Further, the reporting landscape is likely to become increasingly complex, given that numerous jurisdictions, including Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and the UK, are planning to integrate the climate-related disclosure framework developed by the ISSB – International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) S16 and IFRS S27 – into their corporate reporting regimes.
          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          RBNZ Preview: Will Orr's 'Shock and Awe' Return as Key Rates Decision Looms?

          FOREX.com

          Economic

          Central Bank

          RBNZ November preview

          New Zealand's economic activity shows little sign of recovery despite significantly lower interest rates, with many sentiment surveys still languishing in recessionary territory. For the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ), this underscores the urgent need for much less restrictive monetary policy.
          With inflation expectations anchored around the midpoint of its 1–3% target range and with projections for another 175 basis points of rate cuts this cycle, the board may be tempted to cut by more than 50 basis points with an 84-day gap between its November and February meetings. A truly jumbo cut next Wednesday could be the path of least regret to stimulate the economy over summer.

          Go big before summer break?

          The risk of a 75-basis-point cut looks underpriced ahead of next week’s RBNZ meeting, particularly given the bank's history of surprising markets under Governor Adrian "shock and" Orr.
          Heading into next week’s rate decision, a follow up 50-point move is favoured. Swaps markets put the probability at a little over 80%, with an even larger 75 the rank outsider at less than 20%. Economists are also backing a 50, with 27 of 30 surveyed by Reuters expecting a reduction to 4.25%.
          RBNZ Preview: Will Orr's 'Shock and Awe' Return as Key Rates Decision Looms?_1

          Path of least regret

          Caution around larger cuts is understandable, especially after the RBNZ moved from 25 to 50-basis-point reductions in September. It could amplify economic concerns further. However, the risk of hesitation when policy is clearly too restrictive outweighs concerns over market perceptions. Based on its own forecasts, the RBNZ sees the neutral cash rate – where its neither restrictive nor stimulatory for the inflation outlook – at 3%, which it expects to reach by late next year or early 2026.
          RBNZ Preview: Will Orr's 'Shock and Awe' Return as Key Rates Decision Looms?_2
          With the current rate 175 basis points above neutral, why not front-load cuts to speed up the transition? Even a 75-basis-point cut next week would leave policy a full percentage point above the estimated neutral rate, maintaining a degree of restraint and mitigating the risk of inflation reigniting.
          And let’s be honest, New Zealand activity data suggests the threat of demand-driven inflation is close to non-existent.

          Assessing inflation reacceleration threat

          Citi's Economic Surprise Index remains negative, showing data consistently underperforming expectations nearly three months into the easing cycle. While monetary policy operates with lags, the persistence of dire soft sentiment indicators is troubling.
          RBNZ Preview: Will Orr's 'Shock and Awe' Return as Key Rates Decision Looms?_3
          The BNZ Performance of Services Index (PSI) released this week hit 46.0 in October, indicating contracting activity. It’s a level comparable to the depths of the Global Financial Crisis and has shown minimal improvement since the RBNZ began cutting rates. Leading indicators like sales and new orders remain far below historical averages. Where does the inflation threat come from given that outlook? Not the domestic economy the RBNZ can influence.
          RBNZ Preview: Will Orr's 'Shock and Awe' Return as Key Rates Decision Looms?_4
          It makes the case for a bold move compelling, especially given the long gap between decisions. A 75-point cut looks mispriced at less than 20% probability, in my view, with risk-reward dynamics favouring positioning for such an outcome.

          Domestic rates outlook not driving NZD/USD

          Before we look at the technical picture for NZD/USD, it’s worthwhile addressing a concern often heard whenever big policy moves are being contemplated: that lower rates will lead to investors fleeing the Kiwi.
          The analysis below disputes that, at least based on what’s been happening recently. While there’s little doubt a 75-point move would likely lead to kneejerk shunt lower for NZD/USD, beyond the short-term, it’s the US bond curve you should be interested in.
          RBNZ Preview: Will Orr's 'Shock and Awe' Return as Key Rates Decision Looms?_5
          Over the past month, NZD/USD has had the strongest relationship with US bond yields between five and 10-years. The Kiwi has often moved in the opposite direction to US yields over this period. The inverse relationship has also been strong with US two-year yields, albeit marginally weaker.
          Tellingly, the correlation with New Zealand two-year yields is moderately negative, suggesting the Kiwi has tended to push higher when domestic rates have fallen. Tell me again that lower rates will lead to a Kiwi massacre?
          Just to reinforce the point, the relationship between US and New Zealand two-year yield spreads has essentially been zero in November. It’s US rates driving the bird.

          NZD/USD technical pictureRBNZ Preview: Will Orr's 'Shock and Awe' Return as Key Rates Decision Looms?_6

          NZD/USD looks heavy on the charts, hitting fresh 2024 lows earlier in today’s session. With the price in a downtrend, mirroring momentum indicators such as RSI (14) and MACD, it’s an obvious sell-on-rallies play. Symbolically, the 50-day moving average has crossed its 200-day equivalent from above, delivering what’s known as a “death cross”. I don’t tend to put much weight on such occurrences, but it’s probably appropriate.
          Near-term, buying has been evident below .5840, making that the first downside level of note. Beyond, .5774 and .5600 should be on the radar, coinciding with market bottoms of prior years. If the Kiwi were to break the downtrend its trading in, which appears unlikely near-term, .5912 and .6053 are levels of potential resistance.
          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          The Fundamental Picture Is Looking Up For EM Sovereigns

          ING

          Economic

          Bond

          EM fundamental heatmap

          *Azerbaijan IIP is estimate of sovereign net foreign assets (FX reserves and SOFAZ assets, net of government external debt).

          Source: National Sources, IMF, World Bank, Brookings, Bruegel, Macrobond, ING; IMF WEO data for 2024 used for Economy & Fiscal variables, External Balance Sheet data is latest available.

          EM sovereigns are more resilient to external shocks

          Much of the discussion following Donald Trump’s US presidential victory has focused on the potential for higher US rates and a stronger US dollar, amid lower global trade volumes, which is likely to produce a tough environment for EMFX. However, despite the external headwinds and global macro uncertainty, the fundamental picture for many EM sovereigns has shifted more positive, with reforms being successfully implemented and balance sheets strengthened despite the significant twin shocks of Covid and the war in Ukraine in recent years. This should help to keep EM sovereign credit markets well supported, despite relatively expensive valuations in terms of tight credit spreads.

          This trend has started to be reflected by improvements in sovereign credit ratings, with the trend of net downgrades seen from 2020 to 2022 shifting to net upgrades, first in 2023 and looking even more positive this year. This is true for all three largest rating agencies – Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, where upgrades outnumber downgrades for EM sovereigns this year. Significant upgrades have included Turkey (multiple times), Qatar, Egypt, Ivory Coast, Brazil, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Serbia, Croatia, Montenegro, Albania, Pakistan, and Mongolia.

          Annual EM sovereign rating changes – Fitch

          Source: Fitch, ING

          When looking ahead, an even more encouraging signal is the shift in the balance of outlooks to positive (more positive than negative rating outlooks), highlighting the potential for further upgrades over the next 12 months. By this measure, both Fitch and S&P’s rating outlook balances are hovering near their most positive level for the past decade, with a negative skew seen for much of this historical period.

          EM sovereign rating outlook balance – Fitch

          Source: Fitch, ING

          Rising stars in focus for investors

          Of particular interest for investors is likely to be the transition from High Yield (HY) to Investment Grade (IG) ratings as a potential technical trigger for strong performance, with potential ‘rising star’ candidates within the EM universe including the BB+ rated Azerbaijan, Oman, Serbia, and Morocco. This dynamic of narrowing the gap in fundamentals between the BB-tier of EM sovereigns and the BBB-tier (where ratings momentum is broadly heading the opposite way, in a more negative direction) is starting to play out in the market, with a compression in the spread differential between the two tiers. Indeed, on a country level, some of these upgrade candidates (Oman, Serbia in particular) are already trading at tighter spread levels than higher rated peers, with market-implied ratings nearer BBB, although we expect a further short-term bounce if the composite rating (average of three major agencies) eventually reaches IG.

          EM USD sovereign spreads by rating (bp)

          Source: ICE, Refinitiv, ING

          Other big stories for investors have been the multi-notch shift for Turkey from B- to BB- given the return to orthodox monetary policy (although we expect the upwards momentum in ratings may take a pause for now), and the first signs of a reversal in South Africa’s long-term down trend, with a positive outlook now at S&P. Among higher-risk frontier names, Egypt and Nigeria also look to have recovered from the brink, with multiple positive outlooks and ratings almost entirely lifted out of the CCC bucket and back towards B- or B. In the IG space eurozone members/hopefuls such as Croatia and Bulgaria have seen upgrades and positive outlooks, along with some improvements in the GCC for Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Overall, it is clear that EM governments are being rewarded for decisive reform efforts, while negative shifts have largely come from political pressures, such as in Kenya, Georgia, and Panama (although not limited to EM countries, as seen with France in the developed world).

          Debt levels rising but lower external vulnerabilities

          An important area of fundamental improvement in the EM world is reduced vulnerability to external shocks. In aggregate, EM current account deficits have reduced, with the median EM deficit near its narrowest in the past decade, meaning generally lower external financing needs across the world. By region, the large surpluses for oil exporters in the Middle East have moderated over the past year but are still in a strong position compared to much of the past decade, while EM Europe has seen a recovery from the energy and terms of trade shock of 2022. At the same time, most economies have been steadily accumulating FX reserves, monetary policy has generally been orthodox and conservative, and more governments have been gradually adopting more flexible exchange rates. Lower foreign holdings of local currency debt represent another area of reduced external vulnerability.

          EM median current account by region (% of GDP)

          Source: National sources, Macrobond, ING

          It’s not all good news for EM sovereigns however, as fiscal accounts are still showing some signs of strain. Fiscal balances have deteriorated relative to the pre-Covid era, and government debt ratios are elevated, even more so when compared to a decade ago. Debt levels in Developed Markets are still higher, but that differential has narrowed and looks set to narrow further. For EM Europe, government spending is likely to remain high on military expenditure and the green energy transition, while in the Middle East most are focused on shifting their economies away from hydrocarbon dependence.

          EM gross government debt by region – IMF WEO (% of GDP)

          Source: IMF WEO Oct 2024, Macrobond, ING

          Overall, the key question is how fiscal deficits are likely to be funded across EM economies. Countries with deep capital markets can be content with local currency funding, although a return of foreign investors to local currency EM debt markets would be helpful here. In EM Europe, many countries have returned as significant international bond issuers since Covid, in contrast to the previous decade of net negative supply, although can also count on financing support from the EU. For frontier and higher-beta names, bilateral and multilateral official funding sources should remain an important safety net, with IMF programmes often the catalyst for a wider range of official financing, as seen this year with the likes of Egypt and Pakistan, although domestic political considerations can often clash with the reform conditionality that comes with such support.

          Among stronger BB names, we expect further ratings upgrades are likely for Serbia, Oman and Azerbaijan, with the latter offering the most potential for spread tightening in the event of upgrade to IG. In the IG tier, Bulgaria would likely see upgrades in the event of eventual eurozone accession, although the timing remains unclear, while Saudi Arabia could also see further gains if oil prices remain elevated and production normalises. For lower rated credits we are sceptical of multiple upgrades for South Africa, although investor sentiment may well move to price in this potential, while Turkey should see a pause in momentum at BB-. The likes of Egypt and Pakistan will also likely see further progress amid strong external support. In contrast, Panama is teetering on the edge of a full downgrade to HY, while some pressures could re-emerge on Romania next year if fiscal consolidation expectations are not met, with market pricing already pointing towards this potential. In the HY space, Senegal is at risk of further downgrades, while Kenya looks most vulnerable among lower rated B-/CCC credits.

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Which Companies are Opposed to the SEC’s New Climate Change Disclosure Law?

          Brookings Institution

          Economic

          The United States ranks second after China in global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, accounting for 13.5% of the worldwide total, according to the World Resources Institute. During his first term, President Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Agreement, a decision that President Biden reversed upon taking office. With the reelection of President Trump, there is a strong possibility he will once again withdraw the country from the Paris Agreement, potentially hindering global efforts to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.
          Corporate leaders have started to come to terms with the need to take climate action seriously, although support for such policies is far from universal. About half of the largest U.S. companies have made net zero emissions pledges, and more than 90% of S&P 500 companies now publish ESG reports. Yet, research has revealed the limitations of self-regulation. Extensive evidence shows that companies exploit the voluntary nature of climate disclosures to further their competitive interests through selective and biased disclosure—a practice commonly known as “greenwashing.
          To mitigate greenwashing and improve market transparency, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently introduced a groundbreaking climate disclosure law. “The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors,” which was adopted in March 2024 after a two-year delay, was intended to expand the scope of greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting among publicly traded companies in the U.S. The law could compel corporations to take climate-related risk seriously and integrate it with their governance and operational strategies. The use of mandatory standards could also reduce the problem of selective reporting and greenwashing, significantly improving the comparability and reliability of climate-related ESG data.
          The importance of this regulation cannot be overstated: U.S. companies, including those in the energy and manufacturing sectors, are among the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. It is estimated that 80% of global GHG emissions were produced by just 57 companies, many of which are based in or operate extensively within the United States.
          The SEC’s regulation thus represents a landmark rulemaking effort that can help curb emissions in line with the ambitions of the Paris Agreement. However, the new law has faced significant criticism. The New York Times described the final rules as “far weaker than originally proposed,” and a former SEC acting chairman questioned whether the law could effectively deter corporate greenwashing. The SEC apparently diluted key provisions in the original proposal to preempt political and legal risks. Nevertheless, the agency was forced to temporarily halt the implementation of its final rules, pending judicial review, in the face of mounting legal challenges from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other actors.
          This is not the first time corporations have opposed climate policies. Industry associations, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute, have long funneled substantial resources into lobbying efforts aimed at stalling climate change legislation. Many major corporations, particularly those in highly emitting industries, actively participate in political campaigns to limit regulatory oversight. These actions have played a major role in thwarting legislative efforts to reduce carbon emissions despite numerous attempts to introduce bills in the U.S. Congress.
          In a newly published study, we analyzed company comments submitted to the SEC on its draft climate-related disclosure law to understand which companies were more opposed to climate change regulation. We generated a quantitative metric of corporate opposition toward the proposed law by conducting sentiment analysis using OpenAI’s GPT-3 Text Embeddings model. We then conducted exploratory statistical analysis to identify company attributes associated with opposition to climate change regulation. Our analysis is based on a sample of 146 major companies, including some of the largest ones.
          Surprisingly, the average company in our sample showed statistically significant, if mild, support for the SEC’s new law. This may reflect the fact that many large companies actively engage in public policy advocacy and adopt environmentally friendly business practices.
          Nonetheless, many companies that submitted letters to the SEC expressed strong opposition to the proposed law. Not surprisingly, energy firms exhibited the highest level of opposition, followed by manufacturing and service firms, reflecting their differing levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies with higher direct GHG emissions, whether in total or per dollar of revenue, were significantly more opposed to the regulation.
          Companies with strong stock market performance in recent years were less opposed to the law, suggesting that financially well-performing companies are, in principle, supportive of climate policy. Moreover, companies with liberal-leaning boards, based on the political campaign contributions of their directors, were less likely to oppose the SEC’s new law.
          Further, we found that companies with more transparent practices—in terms of non-financial disclosures—were less opposed to the regulation. Companies that have adopted the OECD Guidelines for responsible business conduct, and those with sustainability committees on their boards were also significantly less opposed to the law. This suggests that well-governed companies tend to have a more favorable stance toward regulatory oversight, likely because they face a lower marginal cost in transitioning to mandatory disclosure regimes.
          Overall, our results indicate that corporations face mixed incentives that simultaneously increase the appeal and risk of climate-related disclosures. For example, larger and financially sound companies adopt a supportive stance toward the regulation of climate-related disclosures, likely in response to rising public expectations. However, these same companies also face increasing GHG emissions, which heightens the risk of disclosure. This explains why, in the absence of regulatory oversight, corporate efforts to demonstrate sustainability could result in greenwashing, as these efforts are often not supported by significant investments needed to reduce environmental impact. In this context, the SEC’s new climate change disclosure law is a welcome development that could greatly enhance corporate transparency and accountability on sustainability issues. The new regulation is facing legal challenges and, under President Trump, will be at significant risk of being repealed.
          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2025 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          FastBull Membership

          Not yet

          Purchase

          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com