Yen Weakens as Markets Brace for Fed Cut and BOJ Tightening Uncertainty

Forex

Economic

Summary:

The Japanese yen slipped further against major currencies ahead of a key Fed meeting, with wide interest rate differentials and uncertain Bank of Japan policy guidance weighing on the currency...

Yen Slides Amid Diverging Global Rate Paths

The Japanese yen continued to weaken on Wednesday, reflecting persistent pressure from global yield disparities. Despite growing expectations that the Bank of Japan (BOJ) will raise interest rates at its upcoming policy meeting, the yen lost 0.6% overnight, hovering near 156.82 against the U.S. dollar. It also fell to record lows against the euro and remained weak against the Australian dollar, which gained 0.8% in the prior session.

Analysts attribute the yen’s vulnerability to a confluence of forces. Long-term U.S. yields have edged higher in recent sessions, while Japan’s fiscal expansion and tepid growth outlook have eroded investor confidence in the yen’s ability to strengthen in the short term. As Alex Hill of Electus Financial noted, the yen is currently acting as “the whipping boy” of currency markets, with risk appetite favoring Antipodean crosses like Aussie/yen and Kiwi/yen heading into 2026.

BOJ Expected to Hike, but Future Path Is Murky

The BOJ is anticipated to raise rates in December, marking a historic shift away from its ultra-loose monetary stance. However, uncertainty looms over the central bank's forward guidance. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the difficult task of managing market expectations amid ongoing fiscal stimulus and mixed economic signals. While some investors are positioned for further tightening, others remain cautious due to the BOJ’s traditionally conservative policy evolution.

At the same time, fiscal expansion measures including those aimed at bolstering household spending and industrial output are complicating the inflation outlook. These factors introduce ambiguity into the causal link between policy normalization and yen appreciation, making it difficult for traders to commit to a long yen position.

Markets Hold Steady Ahead of Fed Decision

In broader currency markets, the U.S. dollar was steady ahead of the Federal Reserve’s highly anticipated policy announcement. A 25-basis-point rate cut is almost fully priced in by markets, but attention is now turning to the tone of Chair Jerome Powell’s press conference and the updated “dot plot,” which outlines the projected rate path through 2026.

The dollar index held firm at 99.23, while the euro traded at $1.1625 and sterling at $1.3301. Investors are particularly sensitive to the risk of a “hawkish cut,” in which the Fed lowers rates but signals a pause or slower pace of easing going forward. As BNY’s John Velis pointed out, Powell’s press conferences have sometimes diverged in tone from official statements, creating volatility.

Rate Cut Expectations Recalibrated as Economy Holds Up

Recent data showing steady U.S. job openings and moderate inflation have led investors to dial back expectations for aggressive Fed easing in 2026. Despite the Fed's dovish bias this year, lingering inflation concerns and a resilient labor market have prompted some policymakers to strike a more cautious tone.

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett, considered a frontrunner for the Fed chair role in 2026, commented this week that there is “plenty of room” to cut rates further but only if inflation remains in check. His remarks reinforce the conditional nature of future rate moves, hinging on whether inflation stays near current levels or accelerates.

Currency markets are entering a critical juncture as the Fed prepares to cut rates and the BOJ inches toward policy normalization. The yen’s current weakness highlights the market’s skepticism about Japan’s ability to tighten meaningfully, especially amid global yield disparities and domestic uncertainties. Meanwhile, the dollar remains resilient, buoyed by cautious optimism about U.S. economic strength. Traders will be watching the Fed’s messaging closely not just the rate cut, but the signal it sends for 2026 as the final tone of the year’s global monetary policy is set.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Political

A New Line of Attack as Trump Targets the Federal Reserve

President Donald Trump introduced a new controversy into U.S. monetary politics on Tuesday, asserting that all four of President Joe Biden’s Federal Reserve appointments were signed by an autopen rather than by Biden himself. The claim was presented without evidence, echoing Trump’s ongoing narrative that autopen-authorized documents from his predecessor are invalid. The allegations emerged as Trump spoke in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, during a campaign-style speech focused on the economy and inflation pressures.

Trump implied that the Fed Chair himself Jerome Powell could be among those whose appointment documents were signed mechanically. Although Powell was originally appointed by Trump, he was reappointed by Biden in 2021, a point Trump used rhetorically to widen the scope of his accusation. His comments revive his long-standing criticism of Powell’s leadership, particularly on interest rate decisions, which Trump has repeatedly argued were implemented too slowly.

Autopen Claims and Their Political Resonance

Trump’s suggestion that Biden’s appointees “are not authorized to be there” highlights a political strategy built on undermining the legitimacy of institutions that shape economic policy. The lack of evidence underscores that the claim functions less as a legal argument and more as a political provocation aimed at reshaping public perception of the Fed’s independence. The causal relationship here is political rather than administrative: by portraying the appointments as potentially illegitimate, Trump seeks to reinforce the narrative that the central bank has operated improperly under his predecessor’s influence.

This is particularly significant given the timing. The Federal Open Market Committee is expected to announce its third consecutive rate cut on Wednesday. Trump has long pressured the Fed to lower borrowing costs, and the appointment controversy adds another layer of pressure on Powell’s leadership as markets brace for the decision.

Fed Governance Under Scrutiny

The individuals potentially implicated by Trump’s remarks include Vice Chair Philip Jefferson, Governor Michael Barr, and Governor Lisa Cook all Biden appointees. These members have participated fully in interest rate deliberations, and the assertion that they may not be legitimately seated could cast a political shadow over upcoming monetary policy decisions.

Trump questioned his aides publicly during the speech, asking them to verify whether the autopen had been used, and specifically called on Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to investigate. His public questioning in real time emphasizes the performative nature of the accusation. It serves to inject uncertainty into the institutional stability of the Fed while reinforcing Trump’s campaign messaging surrounding administrative competence and economic stewardship.

A Collision of Politics and Monetary Policy

This episode arrives at a moment when the Fed is facing an internally divided committee, elevated inflation expectations, and the challenge of signaling future policy without reliable economic data after a lengthy government shutdown. Before the latest controversy, the Fed was already expected to deliver a cautious rate cut, potentially accompanied by hawkish guidance. Trump’s remarks add a political dimension that may heighten scrutiny of the central bank’s independence at a critical juncture.

The correlation between Trump’s political strategy and the timing of his accusations is clear: raising questions about the legitimacy of the Fed's leadership may shape public expectations and influence narratives around economic conditions as the U.S. heads into an election cycle. However, any direct causal impact on monetary policy remains unlikely, as the Fed operates under institutional norms that shield decision-making from political claims.

Trump’s autopen accusation introduces a new layer of uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve at a pivotal economic moment. While there is no evidence to support the claim, the political implications are significant: the remarks signal renewed efforts to question the legitimacy of Biden-era governance, exert pressure on Jerome Powell, and reshape the political context surrounding interest rate policy. As the Fed prepares to announce its next move, these comments underscore the increasingly intertwined nature of monetary policy and political rhetoric in the United States.

Source: CNBC

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Consumer Inflation Picks Up, but Producer Deflation Persists

China’s economic outlook presents a conflicting narrative as consumer inflation climbed to 0.7% in November the highest since February 2024 while producer prices continued their slide, declining 2.2% year-on-year. This divergence reflects the uneven effects of Beijing’s policy tools: targeted consumption support has had localized success, but industrial pricing power remains weak amid sluggish domestic demand and global trade frictions.

The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) attributed the CPI rise mainly to a rebound in food prices, particularly after October’s 2.9% decline. Notably, home appliance and clothing prices rose 4.9% and 2% respectively, likely due to state-backed consumption incentives. However, headline CPI still contracted 0.1% month-on-month, falling short of expectations, which indicates fading post-holiday momentum.

Core Inflation Signals Stability, Not Strength

Core inflation, excluding food and energy, held steady at 1.2% for the second month in a row. This consistency suggests that underlying domestic demand is stabilizing but not accelerating. This is consistent with a correlation not necessarily a causation between targeted fiscal stimulus and modest price firming in sectors like retail and durable goods.

The data paints a picture of partial success: while prices in some consumer sectors are responding to policy stimulus, the broader disinflationary trend remains intact. The continued softness in monthly CPI and the limited breadth of price increases indicate that China’s recovery remains fragile and narrowly based.

Factory-Gate Prices Show Deepening Deflation

More troubling for policymakers is the persistence of factory-gate deflation. Producer prices have now been in negative territory for four straight years, with November’s 2.2% fall deeper than expected. Coal mining and oil/gas extraction prices plunged 11.8% and 10.3%, respectively, pointing to excess industrial capacity, weak energy demand, and falling global commodity benchmarks.

This deepening deflation in upstream sectors reveals a causal relationship between weak construction/housing demand and the industrial sector’s pricing weakness. Despite the resilience of export volumes bolstered by pivoting away from U.S. markets internal imbalances continue to weigh on the supply chain.

Structural Weaknesses Drag on Growth Outlook

China’s broader economic challenges particularly the property downturn and weak employment growth remain central risks to inflation stabilization. Economists argue that these structural drags are likely to maintain downward pressure on both consumer sentiment and industrial profitability, raising the likelihood of sustained deflation risks in 2026 unless addressed through deeper reforms or broader fiscal support.

While China is still on track to meet its “around 5%” GDP target for 2025, primarily due to strong trade performance and manufacturing shipments to non-U.S. markets, the domestic demand side remains structurally subdued. With the Politburo identifying demand expansion and supply rebalancing as 2026 priorities, there is acknowledgment of the need to restore household confidence and economic balance.

Policy Outlook: Limited Tools, Greater Expectations

Although Beijing maintains a bias toward easing, there is increasing evidence that policymakers are reluctant to implement large-scale, broad-based stimulus. Goldman Sachs economist Lisheng Wang noted that authorities may need to reinforce their pro-growth messaging and possibly scale up interventions, particularly if the property sector’s drag deepens.

Markets are now focused on the upcoming Central Economic Work Conference, expected to clarify fiscal and monetary policy direction for 2026. While official targets will not be released until March, this meeting is seen as crucial for signaling how aggressively Beijing is willing to counteract internal deflationary forces and meet its growth ambitions.

China’s November inflation data underscores the complex balancing act facing policymakers. Rising consumer prices hint at the limited success of targeted stimulus, while deeper producer deflation signals unresolved structural weakness. The coexistence of headline inflation and industrial deflation creates a contradictory environment that complicates policy design for 2026. As domestic demand recovery remains uneven, policymakers must navigate carefully between maintaining credibility, stimulating consumption, and preventing industrial stagnation all while managing geopolitical tensions and global economic headwinds.

Source: CNBC

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Markets Prepare for a Dovish Move with a Hawkish Message

As the U.S. Federal Reserve concludes its final policy meeting of 2025, the markets are nearly unanimous in pricing in a 25-basis-point rate cut to a new target range of 3.5% to 3.75%. However, the optimism may be short-lived. Despite the expected easing, analysts and traders are increasingly discussing the likelihood of a “hawkish cut” a reduction in interest rates that is accompanied by cautious forward guidance or signals of a potential pause in 2026.

This scenario, if realized, could challenge bullish sentiment by suggesting that the path of monetary easing may not be as aggressive or prolonged as previously expected. The CME FedWatch tool shows an 88.6% probability of a cut, indicating the move is already priced into equities. Any shift toward policy restraint could therefore trigger disappointment rather than relief.

The Dot Plot and Powell’s Language Hold the Key

Much of the market reaction will hinge on the Fed’s updated “dot plot” its projection of future interest rate moves as well as Jerome Powell’s tone during the press conference. If the plot shows a flat or higher expected rate path for 2026, and if Powell emphasizes inflation vigilance or data dependency, traders could interpret the move as a signal that the Fed is nearing the end of its cutting cycle.

This dynamic reveals a causal relationship between forward guidance and asset repricing: rate cuts alone may no longer move markets unless paired with clear dovish momentum. In fact, restraint in the Fed’s outlook or signs of internal division among policymakers may be enough to halt the recent equity rally.

Equities Mixed Ahead of the Decision, While Risk Markets Surge

Ahead of the announcement, U.S. equity indexes reflected caution. The S&P 500 ended mostly flat, the Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 0.38%, and the Nasdaq eked out a modest gain of 0.13%. Interestingly, the Russell 2000 small-cap index hit an intraday high, suggesting speculative appetite remains active even as uncertainty builds.

In global markets, Vietnam’s stock market continues to attract attention. The VanEck Vietnam ETF (VNM) is up approximately 62% year-to-date, driven by domestic reforms and trade tailwinds. Analysts suggest the rally may persist into 2026, with the country positioning itself as a beneficiary of supply chain diversification trends.

Geopolitics and Trade Data Add to Crosscurrents

Beyond monetary policy, geopolitical and trade-related developments continue to influence market expectations. The U.S. has adjusted its timeline for Chinese soybean purchases, following slower-than-expected progress. Meanwhile, optimism is building around Nvidia’s potential to sell more advanced AI chips to China. Though the market reaction has been subdued, analysts suggest this could meaningfully improve the company’s revenue outlook in 2026, depending on Beijing’s willingness to buy the newer H200 chip.

As the Fed prepares to cut rates again, the real market driver may not be the rate move itself but the messaging that accompanies it. A hawkish cut one that signals caution or a long pause could dull year-end celebrations, especially if economic projections show a more restrained path for 2026. The equity rally, while still alive, faces a credibility test as central banks signal their next moves with more nuance than force. Investors should remain alert not only to what the Fed does, but what it says and what it signals next.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Winkelmann

Forex

Economic

Apartment buildings in Seoul, Dec. 7 / Yonhap

Household loans extended by Korean banks grew at a slower pace in November amid tightened lending regulations aimed at cooling the overheated property market in the capital region, central bank data showed Wednesday.

Banks' outstanding household loans stood at 1,175.6 trillion won ($799.62 billion) as of end-November, up 1.9 trillion won from a month earlier, according to the Bank of Korea (BOK).

The growth slowed from the 3.5 trillion-won increase tallied in the previous month.

Home-backed loans rose 700 billion won on-month to 935.5 trillion won, decelerating from a 2 trillion-won gain in October. Unsecured and other types of household loans climbed 1.2 trillion won to 239.2 trillion won in November, following a 1.4 trillion won gain a month earlier.

"Mortgage loans grew at a slower clip despite the increase in housing transactions prior to the Oct. 15 measures, as banks continued to tighten household lending and demand for jeonse loans declined," a BOK official said.

Under the tightened rules announced in mid-October, the government designated 21 more districts in Seoul as speculative zones, placing all 25 districts in the capital under stricter regulations. It also toughened lending limits, capping mortgage loans at as little as 200 million won.

Jeonse is a unique housing rental system in Korea in which tenants make a large lump-sum deposit that is fully returned at the end of the lease.

"Other household loans continued to increase markedly amid an expansion in both domestic and overseas stock investments," the official added.

The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) has surged nearly 70 percent so far this year, driven by the semiconductor market upcycle, optimism over the artificial intelligence (AI) boom and government-led market reform measures.

The data also showed that corporate loans increased 6.2 trillion won on-month in November, up from a 5.9 trillion-won rise the previous month.

Outstanding corporate loans stood at 1,372.2 trillion won at the end of November, the BOK said.

Source: Koreatimes

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Political

Border Conflict Resurfaces Despite Previous Peace Agreement

Violent clashes have resumed between Thailand and Cambodia, reigniting long-standing tensions along their shared 800-kilometer border. Over the weekend, artillery exchanges escalated, with Thailand deploying F-16 fighter jets after accusing Cambodia of rocket attacks on civilian areas. This latest outbreak of hostilities marks a resurgence in one of Southeast Asia’s most persistent flashpoints, despite the recent diplomatic progress marked by the signing of the Kuala Lumpur Accords in October.

The renewed fighting undermines earlier hopes of stabilization following trade-linked peace efforts orchestrated by the Trump administration. The volatility reflects a recurring pattern in Thai-Cambodian relations, often exacerbated by shifting domestic political agendas and nationalist sentiment on both sides.

Trump’s Response: Diplomacy Coupled With Trade Threats

Speaking at an event in Pennsylvania on Tuesday night, President Trump pledged to personally intervene by calling both nations' leaders, repeating his claim of having resolved multiple global conflicts through direct pressure and tariff threats. “We’re making peace through strength,” he said, positioning himself once again as a dealmaker capable of halting conflict through economic leverage.

Earlier in July, Trump had threatened trade penalties against both nations amid border violence that resulted in dozens of deaths. This was followed by the Kuala Lumpur Accords, signed in late October, which outlined a roadmap for de-escalation and economic cooperation. Trump’s use of trade tools as geopolitical levers illustrates a causal strategy leveraging economic incentives and threats to secure political stability though its sustainability remains in question given the current relapse.

Washington's Official Response and International Pressure

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a firm statement urging an “immediate cessation of hostilities” and reiterating the need to adhere to the de-escalatory steps defined in the October agreement. The call emphasized the protection of civilians and a return to diplomatic channels, highlighting Washington’s concern about the risk of regional destabilization.

This aligns with a broader shift in U.S. foreign policy toward conditional engagement: offering trade benefits in exchange for peace while threatening isolation or tariffs in response to aggression. However, the recurring nature of the Thailand-Cambodia conflict raises doubts about whether such short-term transactional diplomacy can ensure long-term regional stability.

Historical Context and the Challenge of Lasting Peace

Tensions between Thailand and Cambodia have historically flared over border demarcation, cultural heritage sites, and nationalist politics. These outbreaks are often less about territorial disputes per se and more about domestic political posturing. The conflict’s cyclical nature suggests a correlation rather than causation between external peace initiatives and temporary ceasefires. Without structural solutions or multilateral enforcement mechanisms, the peace agreements risk becoming symbolic rather than transformative.

The resurgence of conflict between Thailand and Cambodia just weeks after signing peace accords challenges the effectiveness of Trump’s trade-linked diplomacy model. While his pledge to intervene directly underscores a bold and personalized approach to foreign policy, it also reflects the fragility of peace when built on economic coercion rather than institutional reconciliation. As tensions mount, the international community will watch closely to see whether Washington’s influence can again deliver a ceasefire and whether it will hold this time.

Source: Bloomberg

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Shifting Tides for Yield Seekers as Fed Easing Continues

The era of effortless income through safe assets is nearing its end. For over a year, income investors enjoyed unusually high short-term yields as U.S. Treasuries hovered above 5%, offering an appealing refuge without the need to take on significant risk. But that window is rapidly closing. With the Federal Reserve expected to deliver its third consecutive interest rate cut this week, yields are falling back toward historical norms. The implications for pensions, insurers, and other institutional investors managing long-term liabilities are significant: the days of sitting safely on cash and collecting meaningful returns are numbered.

There is a clear causal relationship between the Fed’s rate cuts and the diminishing attractiveness of low-risk fixed-income assets. The easing cycle, launched in response to slowing inflation and decelerating growth, is suppressing short-term yields. At the same time, the AI-driven equity rally and resilient U.S. economy have led to a broad compression of returns across asset classes, exacerbating the dilemma for income-focused portfolios. Dividend yields on global equities remain near two-decade lows, and investment-grade credit spreads offer little compensation for risk, particularly if the economic outlook deteriorates.

Long-Term Allocators Pivoting Toward Risk and Illiquidity

As safe yields decline, institutional portfolios are being pushed toward longer-duration, higher-risk, or less-liquid exposures. BlackRock reports increasing interest in high-yield debt, emerging-market bonds, AAA-rated collateralized loan obligations, and structured securitizations. Private credit, in particular, has re-emerged as a favored destination. Despite concerns over deal quality and market saturation, the relative yield advantage of private loans over public bonds is once again drawing attention. JPMorgan and Vantage Point Asset Management both note a revival in appetite for private credit strategies, with selective allocations supporting new income-focused vehicles.

Capital is also flowing into specialized, non-traditional yield instruments. Catastrophe bonds and insurance-linked securities are attracting institutional demand, with their uncorrelated payouts offering rare-event risk premiums. Funds like the Victory Pioneer CAT Bond Fund have grown substantially since their inception, reflecting investors' growing need to diversify away from public credit and equity markets.

The global equity landscape is offering little relief. Soaring valuations especially in technology stocks have reduced dividend yields across the MSCI All Country World Index. At the same time, more firms are prioritizing share buybacks over dividend payouts, limiting the reliability of equities as a source of steady income. According to Vanguard, this structural shift is intensifying the challenge of building income-generating portfolios without assuming elevated market volatility.

Yield Curve Dynamics Add Complexity to Portfolio Construction

While short-term rates are directly responsive to Fed actions, longer-dated Treasury yields are being shaped by broader macroeconomic forces, including inflation expectations, growth prospects, and fiscal dynamics. Even as the Fed trims its policy rate, 10- and 30-year bond yields have climbed in recent weeks, highlighting a disconnect between monetary policy and market sentiment. This introduces timing risk into duration-based strategies and complicates income optimization for fixed-income managers.

In a few regions, yield opportunities remain. Sticky inflation in Australia and increased government borrowing in the UK have pushed local rates higher, creating selective openings for yield seekers. However, these are exceptions rather than the norm. Across most developed markets, the tightening income environment is a shared reality, leaving few easy options for conservative allocators.

The combination of falling Treasury yields, compressed credit spreads, and low equity dividends marks the onset of what may be called the "Great Income Squeeze." For income investors, the era of earning high returns from low-risk assets is drawing to a close. The causal force behind this shift is unmistakable: the Federal Reserve’s easing cycle is lowering the floor for safe yields. In response, portfolios are being reshaped toward riskier, longer-dated, or less-liquid assets with a growing reliance on private and alternative markets. As the incentive to stretch across the risk curve grows stronger, the balance between yield and safety is becoming more difficult to strike.