Trump Pressures Fed Chair Powell Over $2.5 Billion Renovation in Possible Path to Dismissal

Economic

Summary:

President Trump is escalating efforts to remove Fed Chair Jerome Powell by accusing him of mismanaging a $2.5 billion renovation of the central bank’s headquarters potentially framing it as grounds for dismissal under the guise of financial misconduct.

Trump Targets Powell Through Fed Renovation Dispute Amid Ongoing Rate Tensions

President Donald Trump’s renewed effort to remove Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has taken an unexpected turn focusing not on interest rates, but on the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed’s historic headquarters. Trump, long frustrated by Powell’s reluctance to lower interest rates, is now framing the extensive renovation project as wasteful and mismanaged, possibly laying the groundwork to dismiss the central bank chief for cause. Though such a move would be legally questionable, it reflects a deeper battle over the Fed’s independence at a politically charged moment.

At the heart of the dispute is the Marriner S. Eccles building and its adjacent facility in Washington, D.C., both of which are undergoing major upgrades to replace aging infrastructure and eliminate hazardous materials like asbestos. The project’s costs have ballooned by $600 million beyond its original estimate due to rising labor and material prices, construction constraints, and expanded environmental remediation. Despite these justifications, Trump has labeled the project “disgraceful” and described Powell’s oversight as indulgent, citing alleged features such as VIP dining rooms and rooftop gardens claims Powell has publicly denied.

Undermining central bank credibility through administrative scrutiny

White House officials, including Budget Director Russ Vought, have accused the Fed of misrepresenting the project’s scope and violating the terms of its initial 2021 planning approval by altering renovation plans without formal resubmission. James Blair, Trump’s deputy chief of staff and a member of the National Capital Planning Commission, has suggested that Powell’s testimony to Congress may have downplayed these changes. This introduces a secondary line of criticism: that the Fed’s decision to cut project costs by scaling back aesthetic elements was itself a violation of approved plans turning a cost-saving measure into a potential ethical liability.

While Trump cannot legally fire Powell over policy disagreements, he could attempt to do so “for cause,” such as misconduct or dereliction of duty. However, using the renovation as justification would set a dangerous precedent. The Supreme Court has signaled limits to presidential authority in removing central bank officials, reinforcing the importance of the Fed’s independence from political pressures. If Trump proceeds, it could spark investor uncertainty, weaken the dollar, and lead to higher borrowing costs as markets reprice U.S. political and institutional risk.

Fed defends integrity, requests independent review

Powell and the Fed have rejected the administration’s accusations. In testimony before the Senate Banking Committee, Powell categorically denied the existence of the lavish features criticized by the White House and emphasized that the project followed Congressional oversight, not executive direction. The Fed has also invited the independent inspector general to review the project’s expenses and governance, signaling transparency and a desire to maintain institutional credibility.

This political maneuvering risks damaging more than Powell’s reputation. If the administration succeeds in redefining internal facility management as a means of dismissal, it may erode the institutional foundations that insulate monetary policy from short-term political influence. The potential dismissal could trigger market turmoil, erode investor trust in the central bank’s objectivity, and compromise the Fed’s ability to act decisively during economic turbulence. Moreover, it introduces a causal link between administrative disputes and broader monetary uncertainty, as investors weigh not only inflation and interest rates, but also executive encroachment.

Trump’s attempt to leverage the Fed’s building renovation as a tool to remove Jerome Powell reveals a deeper conflict between political authority and institutional independence. While the legal basis for dismissal remains tenuous, the political optics and economic implications are substantial. Should this strategy advance, it could shake market confidence and set a precedent where central bankers are held hostage to executive grievances undermining the very foundations of independent monetary governance that have underpinned U.S. economic stability for decades.

Source: AP

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Forex

Foreign Currency Hoarding in China Reaches Record Levels Amid Yuan Weakness

China’s foreign currency deposits surged to $1.02 trillion in June 2025, reaching the highest level since March 2022, as both households and non-financial firms raced to secure dollar holdings. The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) reported that foreign exchange deposits increased by a record $165.5 billion in the first half of 2025 marking the largest net increase since the central bank began releasing this data in 2005. This phenomenon illustrates a growing lack of confidence in the Chinese yuan and broader economic prospects.

The driving forces behind this trend are closely tied to the persistent interest rate differential between China and the U.S. While the U.S. Federal Reserve has held rates elevated, Chinese rates remain low, discouraging the conversion of dollar deposits back into yuan. Becky Liu, Head of China Macro Strategy at Standard Chartered, noted that the wide interest rate gap is a central factor behind the low conversion rate. The incentive to hold dollars instead of yuan becomes stronger when the return on Chinese assets is comparatively weaker.

Corporate hesitation amid fragile growth outlook

Businesses are also pulling back from fixed asset investment, a key indicator of economic momentum, with figures from the first half of the year falling short of forecasts. This suggests a strategic shift toward capital preservation over expansion. According to Liu, firms are increasingly considering diversification abroad due to softening domestic demand and ongoing doubts about the yuan’s ability to recover even in the face of a declining U.S. dollar.

June’s trade surplus came in at $114.8 billion, the highest in five months, ensuring a steady inflow of foreign currency. Exporters have been a major source of this supply, converting overseas earnings into domestic deposits. Yet instead of strengthening confidence in the yuan, these flows have been parked in dollar deposits, indicating a preference for liquidity and safety over local reinvestment.

Yuan’s limited recovery underscores structural fragility

Despite gaining marginally in 2025 thanks in part to an 8% drop in the U.S. dollar the yuan has underperformed relative to other Asian currencies. Its appreciation has been constrained by persistent deflationary pressures, weakening consumer sentiment, and expectations of further rate cuts to stimulate growth. These macroeconomic conditions suggest that the recent stabilization in the yuan may be more temporary than structural.

Recent swap market data indicates that demand for U.S. dollars may be softening, as reflected in declining swap points. However, analysts caution that this cooling is likely to be gradual rather than decisive. With U.S. rates still materially higher and market expectations for a September Fed rate cut diminishing, the fundamental appeal of holding foreign currency remains strong. Liu warns that the yuan is more likely to depreciate than appreciate in the second half of 2025, driven by sluggish growth, potential capital outflows in equities, and falling exports.

China’s unprecedented surge in foreign currency deposits is a strong indicator of internal economic fragility and weakening confidence in the yuan’s near-term stability. While some technical signals suggest a modest slowdown in dollar demand, the broader structural trend fueled by interest rate disparities, soft domestic activity, and cautious corporate behavior points to continued accumulation of foreign exchange assets. Unless Beijing can meaningfully revive growth and restore investor confidence, foreign currency hoarding is likely to remain a defining feature of China’s financial landscape through the remainder of 2025.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Stocks

Asian Markets Weaken as Tariff-Led Inflation Reshapes Fed Expectations

The release of June’s U.S. inflation report showing a 0.3% rise in consumer prices reverberated across global financial markets. Though the increase was anticipated, it marked the largest monthly gain since January, reinforcing concerns that rising import tariffs are beginning to lift core consumer costs. Economists linked the price uptick in everyday goods such as coffee and furnishings directly to Trump’s aggressive trade policy, a connection that is influencing monetary policy expectations and weighing on investor confidence in Asia.

In response to the inflation data, U.S. Treasury yields surged to their highest levels in over a month, with the 10-year yield peaking at 4.495%. The increase in yields is consistent with the market’s reassessment of the Federal Reserve’s next steps. Traders now price in only 43 basis points of rate cuts by year-end, down from prior expectations. This upward movement in yields propelled the dollar higher, particularly against the yen, which touched 149.04 the weakest level for the Japanese currency since April 3. The dollar index held firm near 98.55, reflecting broad strength across major peers.

Asian equities react to Fed repricing

Equity benchmarks across Asia struggled under the weight of monetary tightening fears. Australia’s ASX and South Korea’s KOSPI both declined by 0.6%, while mainland Chinese blue chips dipped 0.1%. The Nikkei was flat, buoyed slightly by the weak yen and continued strength in tech names like Nvidia, which had rallied 4% overnight. Taiwan’s benchmark added 0.5%, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng jumped 0.8%, continuing a tech-driven rebound.

Despite the broader macro pressures, some pockets of strength remained in tech-focused markets. Nvidia’s performance helped lift sentiment in sectors tied to artificial intelligence, partially offsetting losses in interest-rate sensitive equities. However, this support was not enough to reverse the regional risk-off tone, as most investors focused on the implications of U.S. inflation for global interest rate dynamics.

Bank earnings offer mixed signals

Corporate earnings remained in focus, particularly among major U.S. financial institutions. JPMorgan Chase and Citibank both reported second-quarter results that exceeded expectations. However, Wells Fargo revised down its 2025 net interest income guidance despite beating on profit, highlighting ongoing margin pressures. More clarity is expected from upcoming earnings releases from Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America.

In commodities, oil prices stabilized after falling more than $1 in the previous session. Brent crude hovered around $69.16 per barrel, while WTI traded at $66.89. Gold saw a modest rebound to $3,332, and Bitcoin climbed 1% to $117,696 after retreating earlier in the week from its record high above $123,000. These price movements suggest investors are cautiously rebalancing exposure amid macroeconomic headwinds.

The combination of tariff-induced inflation, tightening U.S. monetary policy expectations, and mixed corporate earnings has created a challenging backdrop for Asian markets. While the inflation data did not surprise, its implications have triggered a repricing of risk across asset classes. The dollar’s strength and rising bond yields reflect a growing consensus that the Federal Reserve may delay rate cuts, reinforcing the view that Trump’s trade policies are not only reshaping inflation dynamics but also dictating the near-term direction of global capital flows.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Inflation Data Hits Target, But Economic Mood Remains Uneasy

The June Consumer Price Index (CPI) report released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics aligned with forecasts, but investors remained cautious as both headline and core inflation ticked higher. Headline CPI rose 0.3% on the month, bringing the annual inflation rate to 2.7%, the highest since February. Though core inflation, which excludes food and energy, came in slightly below expectations at 0.2%, the broader trend reinforced concerns that inflationary pressures remain persistent.

Analysts and market strategists increasingly attribute the recent inflation uptick to trade policy shifts. Matthew Ryan, head of market strategy at Ebury, emphasized that Trump’s tariffs had “practically confirmed” their role in lifting prices across a range of consumer goods. This indicates a causal relationship: as tariffs increase the cost of imported products, domestic consumer prices respond accordingly. Goods like coffee, home furnishings, and audio equipment largely reliant on global supply chains have seen measurable price hikes.

Markets react to predictable yet troubling signals

While the data met expectations and avoided unpleasant surprises typically a stabilizing factor for markets investor sentiment was nonetheless negative. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped by 0.98%, and the S&P 500 fell 0.40%. The Nasdaq Composite defied the trend, buoyed by a 4% surge in Nvidia’s stock, which helped the tech-heavy index close at a record high. However, this divergence reflects sector-specific momentum rather than broader confidence in the macroeconomic outlook.

The inflation report complicates the Federal Reserve's policy trajectory. Though not considered alarming in isolation, the persistent elevation above the 2% target could pressure the Fed to maintain higher interest rates for longer. As a result, expectations for monetary easing have diminished. The consistency of rising prices, particularly from imported goods, creates a policy dilemma: should the Fed respond to tariff-induced inflation, or wait for more definitive signs of demand-side overheating?

Corporate earnings and regional optimism

Offsetting macroeconomic gloom was upbeat corporate news. JPMorgan Chase and Citibank both exceeded second-quarter earnings expectations, signaling ongoing strength in financial performance. CEO Jamie Dimon’s statement that JPMorgan is exploring stablecoins also hints at continued financial innovation amid regulatory uncertainty. Meanwhile, a Bank of America survey revealed that 81% of European fund managers remain bullish on the continent’s equities, reinforcing global investment optimism despite U.S. inflation anxieties.

In parallel with economic developments, a suite of cryptocurrency regulation bills backed by Trump failed to advance in the House of Representatives, marking a political setback for his policy agenda. The failure during what was dubbed “Crypto Week” reflected rare dissent within Republican ranks, signaling resistance to centralized influence even on technology-forward issues. Though unrelated to inflation directly, the vote underscores a broader environment of political unpredictability.

June’s inflation figures may have avoided shocks, but they still deliver an uncomfortable message: Trump’s trade policies are beginning to feed into core price levels, tightening the Federal Reserve’s policy space and weighing on investor sentiment. While headline data matched forecasts, the underlying causes especially tariff-related cost pressures suggest that inflation could remain elevated even in a slowing global economy. In this context, meeting expectations no longer equates to reassurance; instead, it reinforces the persistence of structural challenges now shaping market behavior.

Source: CNBC

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

US-Vietnam Trade Pact Approaches Finalization Amid Rising Regional Trade Tensions

President Donald Trump announced that a trade agreement with Vietnam is nearly finalized, though he has not disclosed precise details. Speaking to reporters at Joint Base Andrews, he confirmed that the deal is “pretty well set,” but downplayed the importance of releasing its full content. Despite the president’s confidence, no comprehensive documentation has been made public, and key elements of the deal remain ambiguous.

Earlier this month, Trump revealed the framework of a proposed agreement that would reduce U.S. tariffs on Vietnamese imports to 20%, a sharp decrease from the 46% previously threatened in April. However, he also introduced a 40% tariff on goods determined to be illegally transshipped through Vietnam. This dual structure implies a conditional tariff regime: products genuinely produced in Vietnam may receive favorable treatment, while those seen as part of evasive trade practices could face severe penalties.

Economic implications tied to origin rules

A central unresolved issue is the criteria for determining illegal transshipment and the threshold of value-added transformation required for a product to qualify as Vietnamese. These distinctions are crucial, as Vietnam’s manufacturing model often involves substantial input from China. Without clear guidelines, both Vietnamese exporters and U.S. importers face uncertainty. If enforcement is inconsistent, the intended effect of deterring trade rerouting may falter. On the other hand, overly strict definitions could penalize legitimate production and hurt Vietnam’s export competitiveness.

While the U.S. government has presented the agreement as a breakthrough, Vietnamese officials have offered a more measured interpretation. The government has acknowledged a joint statement on a trade framework but has not confirmed the specific tariff rates or enforcement mechanisms mentioned by Trump. This discrepancy underscores the tentative nature of the deal and suggests that negotiations are ongoing behind the scenes.

Vietnam’s shifting trade dynamics with China and the US

Vietnam’s economic positioning has evolved rapidly since the U.S.-China trade war began in 2018. Exports to the U.S. nearly tripled, reflecting a manufacturing shift from China to Vietnam as companies sought to avoid U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods. Simultaneously, Vietnam’s imports from China surged, mirroring its export growth to the U.S., with both flows reaching approximately $140 billion in 2024. This symmetry indicates a strong interdependence and raises suspicions that some Chinese-origin goods are being rerouted through Vietnam a concern Trump’s policy aims to address.

There appears to be a causal link between the U.S.-China trade war and Vietnam’s export boom, as companies relocated production or restructured supply chains to mitigate tariff impacts. Trump’s current approach seeks to reverse potential circumvention of trade rules by tightening scrutiny on transshipment. However, the delayed publication of the deal’s specifics limits stakeholders’ ability to assess the policy’s enforceability or economic consequences. Moreover, the potential introduction of subjective or opaque enforcement criteria could create trade friction or disincentivize foreign investment.

While the U.S.-Vietnam trade deal may offer a framework for continued bilateral cooperation and reduced tariff exposure, its lack of detail raises practical concerns. The outcome will largely depend on how transshipment rules are defined and enforced, and whether the final agreement can balance protectionist goals with the need for predictable and transparent trade regulations. Until then, both exporters and policymakers remain in a holding pattern, awaiting clarity that will determine the future shape of U.S.-Vietnam trade relations.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Forex

Stronger Dollar Reflects Tariff-Driven Inflation and Hawkish Shift in Market Outlook

The U.S. dollar appreciated on Wednesday, buoyed by a climb in Treasury yields following the release of inflation data that hinted at emerging price pressures from the Trump administration’s new wave of tariffs. As core goods such as coffee, audio equipment, and home furnishings saw noticeable price increases, investors began re-evaluating the likelihood of Federal Reserve rate cuts in 2025.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield hit a one-month high at 4.4950%, while the 2-year yield held steady at 3.9503% after a 6-basis-point surge in the prior session. These movements reflect a shift in sentiment, as traders now price in only 43 basis points of rate cuts by December, compared to over 50 basis points earlier in the week. The moderation in rate-cut expectations stems from mounting concerns that tariffs are beginning to exert upward pressure on core goods inflation.

Currency market reactions reflect policy divergence

The dollar’s strength was most pronounced against the Japanese yen, which weakened to 149.03 overnight its lowest level in four months before settling at 148.90. The euro and British pound also remained under pressure, trading near three-week lows at $1.1608 and $1.3394, respectively. Meanwhile, commodity-linked currencies such as the Australian and New Zealand dollars saw only modest gains, suggesting that the global monetary policy outlook remains a secondary driver amid U.S.-centric inflation fears.

Though the overall inflation report was not alarming in magnitude, the specific rise in core imported goods suggests a potential causal relationship between new tariff measures and upward pricing trends. Nathaniel Casey from Evelyn Partners notes that while it is premature to make definitive conclusions, early signs indicate that tariffs may already be contributing to inflationary momentum. This introduces additional uncertainty for the Federal Reserve, which may now hesitate to proceed with rate cuts despite prior dovish expectations.

Market unease also stems from political tension surrounding the Federal Reserve. President Trump has openly criticized Fed Chair Jerome Powell and suggested that recent cost overruns on a $2.5 billion Fed building renovation could be grounds for dismissal. Strategists like Molly Schwartz at Rabobank suggest that the political pressure could accelerate Powell’s departure and pave the way for a more dovish successor, further complicating the market’s interpretation of long-term policy direction.

Global trade outlook weighs on sentiment

Trump’s tariff agenda continues to ripple through markets. Following the 19% tariff agreement with Indonesia, the president announced that more countries would soon receive similar notifications, with rates expected to average just over 10%. The policy stance signals a broader protectionist trend, which could trigger further trade-related inflation and suppress global growth, especially among smaller export-reliant economies.

The recent uptick in U.S. inflation, partly attributed to tariffs, is reshaping expectations around Federal Reserve policy. As bond yields climb and the dollar strengthens, markets are responding not only to immediate economic data but also to rising geopolitical tension and uncertainty over future monetary leadership. The interaction between policy-induced inflation and central bank hesitation illustrates a developing causal feedback loop, suggesting that Trump’s trade measures could influence both economic fundamentals and the strategic direction of U.S. monetary policy in the months ahead.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Commodity

Crude Oil Finds Support from Travel Boom and Economic Resilience

Oil markets registered a modest but steady gain in early Wednesday trading, reversing two consecutive sessions of decline. Brent crude rose by 29 cents to reach $69 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate advanced by 40 cents to $66.92. This recovery reflects shifting sentiment as market participants weighed conflicting pressures, including geopolitical risk and seasonal consumption trends.

The primary upward force stems from seasonal patterns, particularly summer travel across the Northern Hemisphere. According to LSEG analysts, peak travel and heightened industrial activity are offering essential momentum. The Fourth of July holiday in the U.S. witnessed a surge in gasoline usage, signaling solid consumer demand and partially offsetting bearish influences such as rising crude inventories and tariff-related uncertainties.

Geopolitical risk downplayed

Earlier in the week, President Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on Russian oil purchases introduced concerns about potential supply disruptions. However, markets soon dismissed this risk as speculative, helping prices stabilize within a narrow trading range. The absence of immediate action and broader focus on demand recovery tempered fears of supply shocks.

Despite slowing GDP growth in China’s second quarter, the decline was milder than anticipated, partly due to accelerated activity ahead of expected U.S. tariffs. Crude throughput data further reinforced this resilience: China’s June refinery output rose 8.5% year-on-year, the highest since September 2023. The increase signals strong domestic fuel demand and reflects improved profitability at state-owned refineries. This trend contributes to sustained import volumes and strengthens the global consumption outlook.

OPEC outlook adds macroeconomic support

Adding to the optimism, OPEC's latest monthly report projects stronger global economic performance in the latter half of 2025. The organization cited better-than-expected activity in emerging markets like India, China, and Brazil, while also noting ongoing recovery in the U.S. and European Union. This macroeconomic narrative suggests a firm base for energy demand to grow, even as short-term risks persist.

The rise in oil prices can be primarily attributed to stronger demand patterns rather than constrained supply. The observed correlation between travel surges and gasoline usage indicates a causal relationship in consumption behavior, particularly in the U.S. Similarly, China’s refinery activity, driven by economic frontloading and profit recovery, underscores a cause-and-effect pattern between macroeconomic planning and energy throughput. On the other hand, Trump’s tariff threats illustrate a correlation with market volatility, though without concrete action, the link remains speculative rather than causal.

Crude oil markets remain delicately balanced, caught between constructive economic signals and the backdrop of geopolitical uncertainty. The recent rebound reflects confidence in consumer-driven demand and consistent industrial output from key economies. While global trade tensions continue to introduce volatility, strong summer consumption and a favorable macroeconomic trajectory appear sufficient to sustain modest gains in oil prices through the coming months.