Markets
News
Analysis
User
24/7
Economic Calendar
Education
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev












Signal Accounts for Members
All Signal Accounts
All Contests



U.S. Challenger Job Cuts MoM (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Initial Jobless Claims 4-Week Avg. (SA)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Initial Jobless Claims (SA)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Continued Jobless Claims (SA)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Ivey PMI (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
Canada Ivey PMI (Not SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Non-Defense Capital Durable Goods Orders Revised MoM (Excl. Aircraft) (SA) (Sept)A:--
F: --
U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Excl. Transport) (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Factory Orders MoM (Excl. Defense) (Sept)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. EIA Weekly Natural Gas Stocks ChangeA:--
F: --
P: --
Saudi Arabia Crude Oil ProductionA:--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Treasuries Held by Foreign Central BanksA:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Foreign Exchange Reserves (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
India Repo RateA:--
F: --
P: --
India Benchmark Interest RateA:--
F: --
P: --
India Reverse Repo RateA:--
F: --
P: --
India Cash Reserve RatioA:--
F: --
P: --
Japan Leading Indicators Prelim (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Halifax House Price Index YoY (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
U.K. Halifax House Price Index MoM (SA) (Nov)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Current Account (Not SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Trade Balance (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
France Industrial Output MoM (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Italy Retail Sales MoM (SA) (Oct)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Employment YoY (SA) (Q3)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone GDP Final YoY (Q3)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone GDP Final QoQ (Q3)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Employment Final QoQ (SA) (Q3)A:--
F: --
P: --
Euro Zone Employment Final (SA) (Q3)A:--
F: --
Brazil PPI MoM (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
Mexico Consumer Confidence Index (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Unemployment Rate (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Labor Force Participation Rate (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Employment (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Part-Time Employment (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
Canada Full-time Employment (SA) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Income MoM (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Dallas Fed PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index YoY (SA) (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Personal Outlays MoM (SA) (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index MoM (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 5-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Prelim YoY (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Core PCE Price Index YoY (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Real Personal Consumption Expenditures MoM (Sept)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. 5-10 Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Current Economic Conditions Index Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Sentiment Index Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich 1-Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. UMich Consumer Expectations Index Prelim (Dec)--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Rig Count--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig Count--
F: --
P: --
U.S. Consumer Credit (SA) (Oct)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Foreign Exchange Reserves (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Exports YoY (USD) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Imports YoY (CNH) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Imports YoY (USD) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Trade Balance (CNH) (Nov)--
F: --
P: --
China, Mainland Exports (Nov)--
F: --
P: --


No matching data
Latest Views
Latest Views
Trending Topics
Top Columnists
Latest Update
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Affiliate Program
View All

No data
The Federal Reserve is no longer speaking with one voice, breaking the hearts of economic nerds everywhere. The minutes from the June 17–18 meeting show real cracks opening up inside the room, with policymakers clashing over how soon, and how deep, interest rate cuts should go.
The Federal Reserve is no longer speaking with one voice, breaking the hearts of economic nerds everywhere. The minutes from the June 17–18 meeting show real cracks opening up inside the room, with policymakers clashing over how soon, and how deep, interest rate cuts should go.
Everyone agreed to hold rates steady at 4.25% to 4.5%, but what came next showed that consensus is slipping fast. According to the Federal Reserve minutes released Wednesday, officials disagreed over whether the next step should be aggressive rate cuts to fight slowing growth or a cautious hold due to inflation risks from Trump’s tariffs.
The majority backed at least one cut later this year, calling the inflation from tariffs “temporary and modest.” But a smaller group thought inflation was still too high to risk easing, especially with the economy showing strength in some areas.
A “couple” of Fed members said they were ready to cut rates as early as this month. Others argued there should be no cuts at all in 2025. The minutes didn’t attach names to these views, but Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller have already gone public. Both said they’d support a cut at the next Fed meeting on July 29–30, if inflation doesn’t spike again.
Meanwhile, “several” officials warned the current rate might already be close to a neutral level. That means there might only be room for a few small cuts. They pointed to inflation still sitting above the 2% goal and said the economy is still showing signs of resilience.
The Fed’s internal projections expect two cuts this year, with three more across the next two years. But the dot plot, which shows individual policymakers’ views, is all over the place. Some want deeper cuts. Others think the Fed should stay on hold.
Trump isn’t waiting quietly on the sidelines. The President has been hitting Powell hard, both in speeches and online. He has insulted and berated him several times.
Powell, for his part, repeated his usual position. He claims the Fed will not respond to political pressure. He said the bank would stay cautious, as inflation remains uncertain and the economy still shows strength. That was backed up in the minutes:
“Participants agreed that although uncertainty about inflation and the economic outlook had decreased, it remained appropriate to take a careful approach in adjusting monetary policy.”
Trump’s new wave of tariffs is only adding to the chaos. He announced the first round on April 2, then followed up with 21 letters to world leaders, warning of new levies unless trade deals are reached. These sudden changes are making it harder for the Fed to see the full picture.
Despite the threats, inflation has stayed low so far. The Consumer Price Index rose just 0.1% in May. While inflation measures are still sitting slightly above the Fed’s 2% goal, the public isn’t panicking.
Meanwhile, Peter Navarro, Trump’s economic adviser, in an op-ed published on The Hill accused Powell of committing his “third major policy blunder in six years” by not lowering rates now. “If he continues this tight-money path through the July 29 Fed meeting,” Peter wrote, “Too Late Powell will go down as the worst Fed chair in history.”
Peter compared Powell to Arthur Burns, Nixon’s Fed chair in the 1970s, who kept rates too low to help Nixon’s re-election and caused long-term inflation and stagnation. Peter said Powell has no economics degree, a rarity for someone leading the world’s largest central bank, and lumped him in with G. William Miller, whose failed tenure ended in under two years.
He then laid out Powell’s earlier missteps. First, raising rates four times in 2018 despite low inflation and a booming Trump economy. That move cut GDP growth in half. Then, in 2021, Powell kept rates near zero even as inflation soared past 5%. He waited until March 2022 to finally act, leading to one of the most intense hiking cycles in Fed history: 11 rate hikes in 12 months.
Peter also accused Powell of staying silent while Democrats passed more than $2 trillion in spending bills, saying Powell failed to warn them it would drive up inflation. Now, Peter argues, Powell is on the verge of another mistake by refusing to acknowledge that Trump’s policies — tax cuts, tariffs, deregulation — are delivering strong growth without overheating the economy.
The European Central Bank doesn’t need to continue easing policy as borrowing costs may already be providing stimulus to the economy, according to Governing Council member Robert Holzmann.
“There is no reason at the moment why a further cut should take place — definitely not at the next meeting, and also for the rest of the year,” the Austrian central-bank chief was cited as saying in an interview with Market News. He added that under his assessment, the current level of borrowing costs “puts us at least at neutral, but quite likely in expansionary territory.”
After eight cuts since June 2024, the ECB is widely expected to keep rates on hold when officials meet this month. That’ll be the last meeting for Holzmann, whose term ends in August.
Key Takeaways:
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) discussed potential monetary policy changes in its June 17–18 meeting, highlighting economic risks and inflation concerns.
Rate adjustments could influence global markets, especially cryptocurrency assets, increasing investor activity.
The FOMC meeting, led by Chair Jerome Powell and other officials, analyzed prevailing economic risks, emphasizing the potential need for a reduction in the target range. Economic uncertainties and inflation pressures were central to discussions, underscoring policy complexity.
Participants considered the possibility of economic activity weakening and assessed inflation pressures as possibly temporary. With current rates held steady since December 2024, the committee remains vigilant amid mixed signals. As Jerome Powell stated, "Most participants assessed that some reduction in the target range for the federal funds rate this year would likely be appropriate, noting that upward pressure on inflation from tariffs may be temporary or modest, that medium- and longer-term inflation expectations had remained well anchored, or that some weakening of economic activity and labor market conditions could occur."
The European Central Bank must keep all its options open, given elevated economic uncertainty, and should neither promise nor exclude another cut in interest rates, according to Governing Council member Joachim Nagel.
“It seems fair to say we are in a good position to respond to further developments,” the Bundesbank president said Wednesday in Tuebingen, Germany. “Yet it would be unwise to commit to a certain interest-rate path, to envisage a further step or indeed, to rule it out.”
Nagel, one of the Governing Council’s more hawkish members, said “heightened uncertainty will not quickly disappear.” Therefore, the ECB “would be well advised to act prudently and to make data-dependent decisions on a meeting-by-meeting basis.”
With inflation at the 2% target and the economy so far resilient to headwinds ranging from trade to wars, officials have signaled that the rate-cutting campaign — amounting so far to eight quarter-point reductions in a year — is nearing an end. But at least some are still open to more easing, with markets expecting at least one more move this year.
Several policymakers including France’s Francois Villeroy de Galhau are concerned about a more permanent undershooting of the ECB’s 2% inflation goal — particularly if the euro strengthens further. Vice President Luis de Guindos told Bloomberg TV last week that any appreciation beyond $1.20 would make things “much more complicated.”
The latest ECB projections already anticipate 18 months of consumer-price growth below 2%, before inflation is seen returning to target in 2027. Nagel stressed that it’s base effects that will push consumer-price growth “a bit lower” in 2026.
“Currently, we are at about 2% inflation — and what is even more encouraging: our experts expect inflation to broadly remain at this sweet spot over the medium term,” he said.
Services inflation, which continues to be elevated, “still warrants caution,” Nagel said, though he stressed that a recent retreat is encouraging.
Turning to the ECB’s monetary-policy strategy assessment, Nagel said he “appreciates” the clarification that officials will also react with the same determination when inflation is significantly above 2% and not only when it’s below that level.
While confirming the symmetric 2% inflation goal, the exercise stressed the ECB will use an “appropriately forceful or persistent policy response” to counter large and lasting deviations in either direction — while the 2021 review focused on too-low inflation.
Nagel also repeated calls that “large-scale asset purchases should remain the absolute exception,” also because of its risks for central banks’ balance sheets.
Policymakers kept all instruments — including quantitative easing — as part of the ECB’s toolbox, without saying in which circumstances they should be used. Comments in the review, however, and by some officials suggest QE could be used more sparingly in the future because of knock-on effects including central-bank losses and asset bubbles.
U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a 50% tariff on copper imports, claiming that the measure was aimed at boosting the domestic copper industry.
Trump announced the tariff in a social media post, making good on his threat from earlier in the week. He also criticized his predecessor Joe Biden in the post, claiming that the Biden administration had compromised the U.S. copper industry.
“Copper is the second most used material by the Department of Defense… This 50% TARIFF will reverse the Biden Administration’s thoughtless behavior, and stupidity. America will, once again, build a DOMINANT Copper Industry,” Trump said.
The president had repeatedly threatened to tariff the red metal and boost domestic production. The U.S. domestically produces just over half the refined copper it consumes annually, with the remainder being imported.
Chile, Canada, and Peru are the biggest copper exporters to the U.S., and have all called for the Trump administration to exempt them from the planned tariffs.
China is the world’s largest copper refiner, but is also the largest consumer of the red metal.
Freeport shares rallied, while U.S. copper futures soared to record highs earlier this week after Trump’s tariff threat.
Federal Reserve officials diverged at their June meeting about how aggressively they would be willing to cut interest rates, split between concerns over tariff-fueled inflation and signs of labor market weakness and economic strength.
Minutes from the June 17-18 meeting released Wednesday showed that policymakers largely held to a wait-and-see position on future rate moves. The meeting ended with Federal Open Market Committee members voting unanimously to hold the central bank's key borrowing rate in a range between 4.25%-4.5%, where it has been since December 2024.
However, the summary also showed a growing divide over how policy should proceed from here.
"Most participants assessed that some reduction in the target range for the federal funds rate this year would likely be appropriate," the minutes stated, as officials saw tariff-induced inflation pressures as potentially "temporary and modest" while economic growth and hiring could weaken.
How far the cuts could go, though, was a matter of debate.
Opinions ranged from a "couple" officials who said the next cut could come as soon as this month to "some" who thought no cuts this year would be appropriate. Though the minutes do not mention names, Fed governors Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller have gone on record saying they could see their way to cutting rates as soon as the July 29-30 Fed meeting if inflation stays under control.
At the same time, "several" officials said they thought the current overnight funds rate "may not be far" from a neutral level, meaning only a few cuts may be ahead. Those officials cited inflation still above the 2% goal amid a "resilient" economy.
In Fed parlance, some is more than several.
Officials at the meeting updated their projections for rate cuts, expecting two this year followed by three more over the next couple years.
The release comes with President Donald Trump ramping up pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell and his cohorts to cut aggressively. In public statements and on his Truth Social site, Trump has lambasted Powell, going as far to call for his resignation.
Powell has said repeatedly that he won't bow to political pressure when it comes to setting monetary policy. For the most part, he has joined the cautious approach, insisting that with a strong economy and uncertainty over inflation, the Fed is in a good position to stay on hold until it has more information.
The minutes largely reflect that position that policy is currently well-positioned to respond to changes in the data.
"Participants agreed that although uncertainty about inflation and the economic outlook had decreased, it remained appropriate to take a careful approach in adjusting monetary policy," the document stated.
Officials also noted that they "might face difficult tradeoffs if elevated inflation proved to be more persistent while the outlook for employment weakened." In that case, they said they would weigh which side was further from its goal in formulating policy.
Since the meeting, Trump has continued negotiations with key U.S. trading partners, with the tariff ground shifting on a near-daily basis. Trump initially announced tariffs on April 2, and then has altered deadlines for agreements, most recently ticking off a series of letters to foreign leaders notifying them of looming levies should they not act.
Recent data indicate that Trump's tariffs have not Fed into prices, at least on a large scale.
The consumer price index showed an increase of just 0.1% in May. While inflation gauges are still mostly above the Fed's 2% target, recent sentiment surveys show the public is growing less fearful of inflation further down the road.
"Many participants noted that the eventual effect of tariffs on inflation could be more limited if trade deals are reached soon, if firms are able to quickly adjust their supply chains, or if firms can use other margins of adjustment to reduce their exposure to the effects of tariffs," the minutes stated.
At the same time, job gains have slowed considerably, though the rate of nonfarm payrolls growth has consistent surprised economists. June showed an increase of 147,000, against the consensus forecast for 110,000, while the unemployment rate unexpectedly fell to 4.1%.
Consumer spending has slowed considerably. Personal expenditures declined 0.1% in May, while retail sales tumbled 0.9%.
White Label
Data API
Web Plug-ins
Poster Maker
Affiliate Program
The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.
No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.
Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.
Not Logged In
Log in to access more features

FastBull Membership
Not yet
Purchase
Log In
Sign Up