• Trade
  • Markets
  • Copy
  • Contests
  • News
  • 24/7
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • Chats
Screeners
SYMBOL
LAST
ASK
BID
HIGH
LOW
NET CHG.
%CHG.
SPREAD
SPX
S&P 500 Index
6939.02
6939.02
6939.02
6964.08
6893.47
-29.99
-0.43%
--
DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
48892.46
48892.46
48892.46
49047.68
48459.88
-179.09
-0.36%
--
IXIC
NASDAQ Composite Index
23461.81
23461.81
23461.81
23662.25
23351.55
-223.30
-0.94%
--
USDX
US Dollar Index
96.990
97.070
96.990
96.990
96.150
+1.020
+ 1.06%
--
EURUSD
Euro / US Dollar
1.18491
1.18514
1.18491
1.19743
1.18491
-0.01211
-1.01%
--
GBPUSD
Pound Sterling / US Dollar
1.36835
1.36880
1.36835
1.38142
1.36788
-0.01258
-0.91%
--
XAUUSD
Gold / US Dollar
4894.49
4894.49
4894.49
5450.83
4682.14
-481.82
-8.96%
--
WTI
Light Sweet Crude Oil
65.427
65.456
65.427
65.832
63.409
+0.175
+ 0.27%
--

Community Accounts

Signal Accounts
--
Profit Accounts
--
Loss Accounts
--
View More

Become a signal provider

Sell trading signals to earn additional income

View More

Guide to Copy Trading

Get started with ease and confidence

View More

Signal Accounts for Members

All Signal Accounts

Best Return
  • Best Return
  • Best P/L
  • Best MDD
Past 1W
  • Past 1W
  • Past 1M
  • Past 1Y

All Contests

  • All
  • Trump Updates
  • Recommend
  • Stocks
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Central Banks
  • Featured News
Top News Only
Share

U.S. House Speaker Boris Johnson: Trump May “readjust” His Immigration Policy

Share

[Speaker Of The U.S. House Of Representatives: Confident Of Sufficient Votes To End Partial Government Shutdown By Tuesday] February 1st, According To Nbc News, U.S. House Speaker Johnson Said He Is Confident That There Will Be Enough Votes By At Least Tuesday To End The Partial Government Shutdown

Share

Iranian Official Tells Reuters: Media Reports Of Plans For Revolutionary Guards To Hold Military Exercise In Strait Of Hormuz Are Wrong

Share

Ukraine's Defence Minister Says Kyiv And Spacex Working On System To Ensure Only Authorized Starlink Terminals Work In Ukraine

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Europe Has Failed To Defeat Russia In Ukraine

Share

Nigerian Army Says It Killed A Boko Haram Commander And 10 Fighters

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: We Never Found The Two Nuclear Submarines Trump Spoke Of Deploying Closer To Russia

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Victory Will Come 'Soon' In Ukraine But Equally Important To Think Of How To Prevent New Conflicts

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Trump Is An Effective Leader Who Seeks Peace

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Behind The So Called 'Chaos' Of Trump, He Is An Effective And Original USA Leader

Share

Russian Security Committee's Vice Chairman Medvedev: Victory Will Come Soon In Ukraine War

Share

Ukraine President Zelenskiy: Next Round Of Trilateral Talks Set For Feb 4-5 In Abu Dhabi

Share

Russian Defence Ministry: Russia Gains Control Over Two Villages In Ukraine's Kharkiv And Donetsk Regions

Share

Trump Says India Will Buy Oil From Venezuela

Share

Istanbul Jan Consumer Price Index 4.56% Month-On-Month - Chamber Of Commerce

Share

Moody's: Interest Payments To Revenue Ratio Set To Worsen Next Year

Share

Moody's: Federal Government Fiscal Deficit Still Wider Than What It Was Prior To Covid

Share

Saudi Arabia's Stock Index Down 2.1% - Lseg

Share

Pakistan Balochistan Chief Minister Says 145 Militants Killed After Attacks Over 40 Hours

Share

Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei: If Americans Start A War This Time, It Will Be A Regional Conflict

TIME
ACT
FCST
PREV
U.K. M4 Money Supply (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Italy Unemployment Rate (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Unemployment Rate (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Prelim QoQ (SA) (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone GDP Prelim YoY (SA) (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Italy PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Mexico GDP Prelim YoY (Q4)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Brazil Unemployment Rate (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Africa Trade Balance (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

India Deposit Gowth YoY

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany CPI Prelim YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany CPI Prelim MoM (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany HICP Prelim YoY (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Germany HICP Prelim MoM (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Core PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --
U.S. Core PPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI YoY (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI MoM (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada GDP MoM (SA) (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

Canada GDP YoY (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI MoM Final (Excl. Food, Energy and Trade) (SA) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. PPI YoY (Excl. Food, Energy & Trade) (Dec)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Chicago PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Canada Federal Government Budget Balance (Nov)

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Oil Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

U.S. Weekly Total Rig Count

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland NBS Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland NBS Non-manufacturing PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Composite PMI (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --

South Korea Trade Balance Prelim (Jan)

A:--

F: --

P: --
Japan Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

China, Mainland Caixin Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Trade Balance (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Inflation Rate YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Indonesia Core Inflation YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

India HSBC Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Commodity Price YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Russia IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Turkey Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Nationwide House Price Index MoM (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Nationwide House Price Index YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Germany Actual Retail Sales MoM (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --
Italy Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Africa Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Euro Zone Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.K. Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Brazil IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Canada National Economic Confidence Index

--

F: --

P: --

Canada Manufacturing PMI (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. IHS Markit Manufacturing PMI Final (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Output Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Inventories Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing Employment Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing New Orders Index (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

U.S. ISM Manufacturing PMI (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

South Korea CPI YoY (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Japan Monetary Base YoY (SA) (Jan)

--

F: --

P: --

Australia Building Permits MoM (SA) (Dec)

--

F: --

P: --

Q&A with Experts
    • All
    • Chatrooms
    • Groups
    • Friends
    3487443 flag
    Today you but later you will
    3487443 flag
    3487443 flag
    The gold star rose slightly this week, then declined for an extended period.
    srinivas flag
    3487443
    Today you but later you will
    @Visitor3487443you do know that gold needs to be mined right?
    3487443 flag
    Did you know that from 1980 to 2000 there were many geopolitical crises, especially wars, even more frequent than now? Do you know about gold speculation and gold accumulation? The current sharp increase in gold prices is very similar to the period from 1978 to 1980. Gold hit its lowest point in 2015 and increased slightly each year until 2019, then surged before falling to 1600. By 2023, gold had increased sharply, and by 2026, it had far exceeded inflation. Gold is no longer a safe asset; it is currently a risky asset.
    3487443 flag
    The true value of gold ranges from $1600 to $2000.
    3487443 flag
    In 1979, gold was above $200 USD, then by June it had quadrupled in value in just a few months. From above $200 USD, gold surged to over $850 USD. At that time, its value was relatively high, especially considering inflation was over 13 percent. Just a few months later, gold plummeted back to above $300 USD.
    3505272 flag
    Has anyone updated the system? That's why your reasoning is correct.
    3505186 flag
    The app is lagging so badly, I can't watch anything.
    3505186 flag
    [100]It's me, Hieu@Chế độ khách3487443
    3507622 flag
    how to trade please guide me
    hong hong flag
    That USA showed a Roun right now
    hong hong flag
    United States they can show Iran right now
    3487443 flag
    3505186
    [100]It's me, Hieu@Chế độ khách3487443
    [100]It's me, kid@Chế độ khách3505186
    hsjskbdb flag
    Similarities: Both are driven by inflation concerns, geopolitical factors, and expectations of currency devaluation. However, they differ in that central banks are now making large-scale, continuous purchases (in China, India, Turkey, etc.), which is not purely speculative . ETFs and institutional allocations are more structural, and there is no extreme single speculative event like the Hunt brothers' manipulation in 1980. Therefore, the price movements are "very similar," but the support is more solid, and while bubble risks exist, they are not entirely the same. Regarding the current surge in gold prices and future prospects, you mentioned that "the increase will far exceed the inflation rate by 2026," which has already partially materialized in 2025-2026. Gold has risen from approximately $2000+ in 2023 to the current $5000+, far exceeding the cumulative CPI over the same period. Most institutions predict that gold will remain in the $5000-$6200 range in 2026 (UBS $6200 target, JPM $5055 average, etc.), with some optimists seeing a possible $7000+. Has gold already transformed from a "safe-haven asset" into a "risk asset"? This is a very sharp observation, and there is indeed disagreement in the market: The traditional view is that gold remains the ultimate safe haven, with low correlation to the stock market, and performs exceptionally well during periods of geopolitical risk, inflation, and a weak dollar. Multiple reports (JPM, VanEck, BIS, etc.) for 2025–2026 still emphasize its role as "insurance," hedging against currency devaluation and geopolitical risks. However, reality has changed: gold volatility has increased significantly in recent years (monthly gains sometimes exceeding 10% in 2025), and its correlation with certain risk assets (such as Bitcoin) has occasionally increased. In times of extreme liquidity tightening or a sharp rebound in risk appetite, gold may also experience short-term sell-offs (like in the early stages of interest rate hikes in 2022). Therefore, to some extent, gold has become partially "risk-averse"—it is no longer a zero-volatility capital-preserving tool, but rather a strategic asset with strong trends and cyclicality. Especially at high levels, speculative elements increase, and the risk of a correction is considerable. However, the mainstream consensus remains that gold still leans towards safety during systemic crises, rather than being a purely risky asset like stocks. Central bank buying and the global trend of de-dollarization have strengthened its "strategic reserve" status. Overall, your historical analogy is quite accurate; gold is indeed currently in a "frenzied + structural" phase similar to the late 1970s, but with more support from real demand. Short-term bullish sentiment remains strong, but whether a repeat of the 1980-1982-style major correction will occur after consolidation at high levels is one of the biggest uncertainties of 2026. What is your view on the probability of a correction? Or which specific driving factor are you more focused on?
    hsjskbdb flag
    Envious of Trump, who can freely control gold prices.
    hsjskbdb flag
    He even acted with Musk last time.
    3507933 flag
    hsjskbdb
    He even acted with Musk last time.
    @hsjskbdbin
    Joyce flag
    have any of you review the lumonel.com that I have been posting my earnings on here
    "ThatfxSniper📈" recalled a message
    Type here...
    Add Symbol or Code

      No matching data

      All
      Trump Updates
      Recommend
      Stocks
      Cryptocurrencies
      Central Banks
      Featured News
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      • All
      • Russia-Ukraine Conflict
      • Middle East Flashpoint
      Search
      Products

      Charts Free Forever

      Chats Q&A with Experts
      Screeners Economic Calendar Data Tools
      Membership Features
      Data Warehouse Market Trends Institutional Data Policy Rates Macro

      Market Trends

      Market Sentiment Order Book Forex Correlations

      Top Indicators

      Charts Free Forever
      Markets

      News

      News Analysis 24/7 Columns Education
      From Institutions From Analysts
      Topics Columnists

      Latest Views

      Latest Views

      Trending Topics

      Top Columnists

      Latest Update

      Signals

      Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
      Contests
      Brokers

      Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
      Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
      Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
      More

      Business
      Events
      Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

      White Label

      Data API

      Web Plug-ins

      Affiliate Program

      Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
      Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
      Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
      FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo
      Recent Searches
        Top Searches
          Markets
          News
          Analysis
          User
          24/7
          Economic Calendar
          Education
          Data
          • Names
          • Latest
          • Prev

          View All

          No data

          Scan to Download

          Faster Charts, Chat Faster!

          Download App
          English
          • English
          • Español
          • العربية
          • Bahasa Indonesia
          • Bahasa Melayu
          • Tiếng Việt
          • ภาษาไทย
          • Français
          • Italiano
          • Türkçe
          • Русский язык
          • 简中
          • 繁中
          Open Account
          Search
          Products
          Charts Free Forever
          Markets
          News
          Signals

          Copy Rankings Latest Signals Become a signal provider AI Rating
          Contests
          Brokers

          Overview Brokers Assessment Rankings Regulators News Claims
          Broker listing Forex Brokers Comparison Tool Live Spread Comparison Scam
          Q&A Complaint Scam Alert Videos Tips to Detect Scam
          More

          Business
          Events
          Careers About Us Advertising Help Center

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Affiliate Program

          Awards Institution Evaluation IB Seminar Salon Event Exhibition
          Vietnam Thailand Singapore Dubai
          Fans Party Investment Sharing Session
          FastBull Summit BrokersView Expo

          Price Rebound Deviates from Inflation Target, September Rate Cut Expectations Face Real-World Challenges

          Diana Wallace
          Summary:

          The day after the Federal Reserve's non-unanimous decision to stand pat on interest rates, a cavalcade of economic indicators appears to suggest not moving was the right move.

          Key points:

          ● S&P 500, Nasdaq advance, but off highs; Dow ~flat
          ● Comm Svcs lead S&P sector gainers; Healthcare weakest group
          ● Euro STOXX 600 index off ~0.7%
          ● Dollar, gold rise; bitcoin up ~1%; crude declines >1.5%
          ● US 10-Year Treasury yield falls to ~4.34%

          The day after the Federal Reserve's non-unanimous decision to stand pat on interest rates, a cavalcade of economic indicators appears to suggest not moving was the right move.

          The PCE price index, Powell & Co's pet inflation yardstick, showed inflation gathering some heat.

          Headline and core (ex. food and energy) prices both rose by 0.3% last month, hitting the consensus nail on the head. Both marked a slight acceleration from May's 0.2% increases.

          But prices rose 2.6% year-over-year, and the core figure posted an annual gain of 2.8%. Both were 10 basis points hotter than expected.

          But stripping away volatile food and energy prices, core PCE rose on monthly and annual bases by 0.2% and 2.7%, respectively. Both numbers were 0.1 percentage points hotter than expected.

          Taken together, they appear to justify the Fed's holding pattern as prices, increasingly waylaid by tariffs, struggle to bridge that troublesome last mile to the Fed's average 2% inflation target.

          "The Fed is unlikely to welcome the inflation dynamics currently taking hold," writes Olu Sonola, head of economic research at Fitch Ratings. "Rather than converging toward target, inflation is now clearly diverging from it."

          "This trajectory is likely to complicate current expectations for a rate cut in September or October," Sonola adds.

          Elsewhere in the report, personal income rose by 0.3%, stronger than the 0.2% analysts expected and marking a partial bounce-back from May's 0.4% decrease.

          Consumer spending, the tent pole of the U.S. economy, increased by 0.3%, weaker than the 0.4% gain economists predicted. And even then, the increase reflects price increases, particularly with respect to gasoline.

          "Consumer spending rose decently in June, but that mostly just kept spending in line with price increases," says Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica Bank. "After a larger decline in May, consumer spending in June was below April’s level."

          Drilling down, consumers continued to rein in their expenditures on durable goods, which dipped 0.5%, while spending on non-durables and services increased by 0.4% and 0.1%, respectively.

          Disposable income was unchanged, which helped hold the saving rate - or the unspent portion of disposable income - at 4.5%.

          The saving rate is often viewed as a barometer of consumer anxiety.

          Last week, 218,000 U.S. workers joined the queue outside the unemployment office USJOB=ECI, or 1,000 more than the previous week and 2.7% shy of consensus.

          The underlying trend, as expressed by the four-week moving average of initial claims, now has a slight downward bias, suggesting that layoffs are on the wane.

          But don't tell that to Challenger, Gray & Christmas (CGC). The executive outplacement firm's planned layoffs report USCHAL=ECI showed that in July, corporate America announced it would lay off 62,075 workers, or a 29.3% increase from June and 140% more than a year ago.

          From January through July, 806,383 job cuts have been announced. That's 75% more than the 460,530 announced in the first five months of last year.

          So far this year, the government - largely as a result of billionaire Elon Musk's DOGE efforts - has cut 292,294 jobs. That's 36.2% of total year-to-date layoffs.

          "We are seeing the Federal budget cuts implemented by DOGE impact non-profits and healthcare in addition to the government," says Andrew Challenger, labor expert at CGC. "AI was cited for over 10,000 cuts last month, and tariff concerns have impacted nearly 6,000 jobs this year."

          Ongoing jobless claims USJOBN=ECI, reported on a one-week lag, essentially held firm at 1.946 million, or 9,000 fewer than analysts expected. The number remains elevated and supports recent consumer survey data suggesting laid off workers are finding it increasingly difficult to find a replacement gig.

          "Continued claims are still elevated, signaling unemployed workers are finding it difficult to find new jobs, but are showing signs of leveling off," says Nancy Vanden Houten, lead economist at Oxford Economics.

          Separately, the Labor Department released its employment cost index USEMPC=ECI, which rose by 0.9% in the second quarter on a quarterly annualized basis, hotter than the 0.8% analysts anticipated and a repeat of the Q1 growth rate.

          All of which is prologue to the Labor Department's July employment report due on Friday, which is expected to show the U.S. economy added 110,000 jobs this month, with the unemployment rate creeping up to 4.2% from 4.1%.

          Finally, Midwest factory activity has continued to contract in July, but at a shallower-than-expected pace.

          MNI Indicators' Chicago purchasing managers' index (PMI) USCPMI=ECI delivered a reading of 47.1, a 6.7-point improvement over June and not quite as gloomy as the 42.0 analysts anticipated.

          Still, a PMI reading south of 50 indicates monthly contraction.

          Market participants will get a clearer picture of the state of U.S. manufacturing on Friday, when the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) releases its nationwide PMI.

          Analysts see that report improving to a barely-contractive but much healthier 49.5.

          Source: Reuters

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Japan's Factory Activity Slips Back Into Decline In July, PMI Shows

          Henry Thompson

          Japan's manufacturing activity shrank in July after briefly stabilising in the previous month as weak demand pulled production back into contraction, a private sector survey showed on Friday.

          The S&P Global Japan manufacturing purchasing managers' index (PMI) fell to 48.9 in July from 50.1 in June, dropping below the 50.0 threshold that separates growth from contraction. The PMI was little changed from the flash reading of 48.8.

          Most of the survey data was collected before the announcement of a Japan-U.S. trade agreement last week, which lowers tariffs imposed on Japan to 15% from a previously threatened 25%.

          As the trade deal with Washington kicks in, "it will be important to see if this will translate into greater client confidence and improved sales in the months ahead," said Annabel Fiddes, economics associate director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, which compiles the survey.

          The key sub-index of output fell back into contraction and at the sharpest pace since March. Companies widely reported reducing production due to lower volumes of new business, according to the survey.

          New orders shrank again in July, though at a slightly slower pace than in June.

          Despite falling production and orders, manufacturers continued to increase staffing in July, though the pace of job creation slowed to a three-month low.

          On the price front, input cost inflation eased to its lowest in four-and-a-half years, while output prices rose at the fastest rate in a year as firms passed on higher costs to customers.

          Business confidence improved to a six-month high in July, with firms expecting improved demand conditions and reduced trade-related uncertainty to support growth over the next year.

          Source: Yahoo Finance

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          South Korea Factory Activity Shrinks For 6th Month On Tariff Concerns, PMI Shows

          Nathaniel Wright

          South Korea's factory activity contracted for the sixth straight month in July, as uncertainty over U.S. tariffs weighed on output and orders, a business survey showed on Friday.

          The Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) for manufacturers in Asia's fourth-largest economy, released by S&P Global, fell to 48.0 in July, from 48.7 in June.

          The index has stayed below the 50-mark, which separates expansion from contraction, since February.

          "July PMI data signalled that the South Korean manufacturing sector experienced a stronger deterioration in operating conditions," said Usamah Bhatti, economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence.

          "Both production volumes and new orders fell at a steeper rate than that in June, with anecdotal evidence indicating that weakness in the domestic economy was compounded by the impacts of U.S. tariff policy."

          The survey was conducted from July 10 to July 23, before South Korea reached on Wednesday a trade deal with the U.S. lowering tariffs to 15% from a threatened 25%.

          In July, output and new orders fell at steeper rates than the month before, although the decline in new export orders contracted at the mildest rate in four months, sub-indexes showed.

          Anecdotal evidence pointed to declining export order volumes in the U.S. and Japan in particular, according to the survey.

          South Korean manufacturers turned pessimistic about the outlook for the year ahead for the first time in three months, citing concerns over the timing of a domestic economic recovery and ongoing uncertainty surrounding U.S. tariff policy.

          Source: Yahoo Finance

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump Will Impose 39% Tariff Rate On Imports From Switzerland

          James Whitman

          Economic

          President Donald Trump will impose a 39% levy on imports from Switzerland, according to an executive order he signed Thursday night.

          Switzerland was among the countries that have not yet finalized trade frameworks with the US before the Aug. 1 deadline for so-called reciprocal tariff rates to take effect.

          The outcome is higher than the 31% tariff rate Trump initially threatened to levy in April when he unveiled duties on dozens of trading partners, only to hold off to allow time for negotiations. That negotiating period was set to end earlier in July and was extended again to August as Trump only secured a handful of agreements.

          The rate on Swiss exports to the US is markedly higher than other trading partners who were able to negotiate frameworks with the US, such as the European Union, Japan and South Korea receiving 15% levies.

          Trump in his second term has carried out a sweeping tariff agenda aimed at pressuring countries and industries to reshore manufacturing in the US and to reduce global trade imbalances. The US had a $38 billion trade deficit with Switzerland last year, just outside a ranking of top 10 trading shortfalls.

          The country had been a priority in international negotiations and had hoped to be among the first to clinch a deal.

          The impact of additional tariffs Trump has threatened on the pharmaceutical industry remain uncertain. The Swiss economy rests on large contributions from industry giants Novartis AG and Roche Holding AG.

          Trump’s tariff rate comes despite months of high-stakes diplomacy intended to complete an agreement, negotiations that forced Bern to balance its commitment to global openness against the protection of domestic agriculture. The industry represents less than 1% of the economy but commands out-sized political influence, and farmers’ lobbyists had threatened to fight any settlement affecting Swiss high-tariff barriers in the area.

          Trump’s April 2 tariff announcement had put Switzerland’s exporters in a double bind as it also caused a sharp Swiss franc appreciation. That prompted the Swiss National Bank to cut interest rates to zero after it had previously signaled it was done with easing.

          President and Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter expressed careful optimism at the end of June that the nation would be able to secure a deal, saying American officials had accepted that Switzerland doesn’t manipulate its currency. During Trump’s first term, the Treasury Department had put the country on a list of jurisdictions it accused of doing so.

          Source: Bloomberg

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Saylor’s New $4.2 Billion Bitcoin Plan Aims to Reassure Skeptics

          Manuel

          Cryptocurrency

          Stocks

          Michael Saylor isn’t backing down. The Strategy co-founder is preparing to sell $4.2 billion more in preferred stock to fuel his latest Bitcoin bet — while throwing a lifeline to investors worried he’s diluting them into oblivion.
          The plan, unveiled with second-quarter earnings on Thursday, is Saylor’s latest answer to the big question hanging over his stock: how long can he keep using a lofty premium to fund ever-larger Bitcoin buys?
          To reassure shareholders, Strategy pledged it won’t issue new common shares at less than 2.5 times its net asset value, except to cover debt interest or preferred dividends. At the same time, Saylor will keep tapping the market “opportunistically” when the premium is high, turning equity sales into fresh Bitcoin buys.
          The move does two things at once: it locks in a floor aimed at reassuring any skeptical shareholders and arms the company with a larger war chest to keep buying Bitcoin. It’s a double play that pits Saylor directly against hedge fund managers like Jim Chanos, who have been betting the company’s premium will collapse.
          “That would put common shareholders who are concerned about potential dilution at ease,” said Brian Dobson, managing director for Disruptive Technology Equity Research at the brokerage firm Clear Street. “The market is reacting positively to Strategy’s equity products. The demand is there as evidenced by their substantial capital raises.”
          It’s the latest in a string of financial maneuvers that have transformed a once-obscure software firm into a leveraged Bitcoin proxy.
          The dual move showcases Saylor’s mastery of capital markets during these bullish digital-asset times: using a self-imposed floor to placate critics, while simultaneously arming the company with fresh ammunition to keep buying Bitcoin.
          The company - which is known formally as MicroStrategy Inc. — has already raised more than $10 billion this year through stock and structured offerings, feeding a balance sheet now holding $74 billion in Bitcoin. Its stock has surged 3,300% since Saylor’s first crypto purchase, outpacing Bitcoin itself and forcing hedge funds into a high-stakes battle over whether his premium-fueled strategy can last.
          Since Strategy’s first Bitcoin purchase in 2020, Saylor has sold equity, issued various types of debt and layered stacks of preferred shares on top. In the process, he has encouraged a fleet of imitators and spurred a new industry of public companies following a so-called treasury strategy dedicated to buying and holding cryptocurrencies.

          Good Times

          Since Strategy trades so far above the value of its Bitcoin, the company can sell stock at rich levels, buy more Bitcoin, and in turn reinforce that premium. It’s a reflexive loop that critics warn would snap if sentiment shifts. For now, Saylor’s ability to turn equity markets into a Bitcoin funding engine has made his firm both a proxy for the cryptocurrency and a pressure point for critics betting the spread will collapse.
          The company reiterated that it registered an unrealized gain of about $14 billion in the second quarter. After factoring in deferred taxes, the Bitcoin treasury company had net income of $10 billion, or $32.60 a share, the firm said in a statement. The eye-catching benefit, first disclosed at the start of the month, was due to a rebound in Bitcoin’s price and a recent accounting change.
          Demand for offerings can fluctuate depending on Bitcoin prices. The firm had to sweeten one of its earlier preferred stock offerings this year with a steep discount to win over price‑sensitive buyers.
          Just last week the company launched a new kind of preferred stock, dubbed Stretch, that was upsized from $500 million to more than $2 billion. It was yet another move that showed how deftly Saylor can turn financial engineering into crypto firepower. For now at least.
          “Strategy’s upsize is a huge reflection on the market demand for its Stretch Preferred Stock offering,” said Tyler Evans, co-founder and chief investment officer of UTXO Management. “They have had similar upsizes from previous preferred stock offerings, but this one is an eye-popping number.”

          Source: Bloomberg

          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump Increases Tariff On Canada To 35%, White House Says

          James Whitman

          Economic

          U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday increasing tariffs on Canadian goods to 35% from 25%, the White House said.

          The new rates goes into effect on August 1.

          "In response to Canada's continued inaction and retaliation, President Trump has found it necessary to increase the tariff on Canada from 25% to 35% to effectively address the existing emergency," the White House said.

          Source: Yahoo Finance

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share

          Trump Says Canada Needs to Pay Up to Reach Truce on Trade

          Manuel

          China–U.S. Trade War

          Economic

          US President Donald Trump said Canada has to “pay a fair rate” in order to reach a trade agreement, as US talks with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney go down to the wire.
          “We haven’t spoken to Canada today,” the president said during an afternoon news conference at the White House. Referring to Carney, Trump said: “He’s called. And we’ll see.”
          Trump again criticized Carney’s announcement that Canada plans to recognize a Palestinian state, but told reporters it’s “not a deal-breaker” in the trade talks.
          The president has threatened to raise the import tax on Canadian goods to 35% by Friday, up from the current 25%, unless there’s a deal between the two nations.
          Trump spoke with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on Thursday morning and shortly afterward the president extended tariff rates on Mexico for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations. He had previously said he might raise them to 30% on Friday, up from 25%.
          However, there’s currently a tariff exemption in place for both Canada and Mexico on goods shipped under the rules of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the accord that Trump signed in his first term. That means the majority of imports from both countries are currently tariff-free — though steel, aluminum and some other products have duties on them.
          Asked what’s holding up a deal for Canada, Trump reiterated previous complaints about Canadian protectionism of its dairy industry and its history of low military spending.
          “They have to pay a fair rate, that’s all. It’s very simple,” Trump said.
          The US and Canada have a bilateral trade relationship worth more than $900 billion annually. The US imported $477 billion of goods and services from Canada last year and exported $441 billion, according to US Commerce Department data.
          Shortly before Trump’s news conference, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on television that he doesn’t see Trump “stepping off the gas” with Canada. Lutnick said that if Carney “starts turning on the charm, and if he takes down his retaliation,” Trump could “let it down a bit.”
          Carney, for his part, has said a number of times that he won’t agree to a deal that is bad for Canada.

          Source: Bloomberg

          To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar
          Risk Warnings and Disclaimers
          You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.
          Add to Favorites
          Share
          FastBull
          Copyright © 2026 FastBull Ltd

          728 RM B 7/F GEE LOK IND BLDG NO 34 HUNG TO RD KWUN TONG KLN HONG KONG

          TelegramInstagramTwitterfacebooklinkedin
          App Store Google Play Google Play
          Products
          Charts

          Chats

          Q&A with Experts
          Screeners
          Economic Calendar
          Data
          Tools
          Membership
          Features
          Function
          Markets
          Copy Trading
          Latest Signals
          Contests
          News
          Analysis
          24/7
          Columns
          Education
          Company
          Careers
          About Us
          Contact Us
          Advertising
          Help Center
          Feedback
          User Agreement
          Privacy Policy
          Personal Information Protection Statement
          Business

          White Label

          Data API

          Web Plug-ins

          Poster Maker

          Affiliate Program

          Risk Disclosure

          The risk of loss in trading financial instruments such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs and crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

          No decision to invest should be made without thoroughly conducting due diligence by yourself or consulting with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you since we don't know your financial conditions and investment needs. Our financial information might have latency or contain inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your trading and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital loss.

          Without getting permission from the website, you are not allowed to copy the website's graphics, texts, or trademarks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belong to its providers and exchange merchants.

          Not Logged In

          Log in to access more features

          Connect Broker
          Become a signal provider
          Help Center
          Customer Service
          Dark Mode
          Price Up/Down Colors

          Log In

          Sign Up

          Position
          Layout
          Fullscreen
          Default to Chart
          The chart page opens by default when you visit fastbull.com