Mixed Economic System: Characteristics, Benefits, and Challenges

Economic

Summary:

Explore the mixed economic system, where capitalism and socialism blend to create a balanced approach to economic decision-making. Learn about its characteristics, benefits, and potential challenges.

A mixed economic system combines elements of both capitalism and socialism, creating a balance that aims to benefit from the strengths of both systems while minimizing their weaknesses. In this type of economic structure, private enterprises and government intervention coexist, with the aim of achieving economic stability, growth, and social welfare. The mixed economy is one of the most common systems in the modern world, and many countries around the globe, including the United States, Canada, and most European nations, operate under such a system.

In this article, we’ll dive deep into the mixed economic system, exploring its characteristics, benefits, challenges, and how it differs from purely capitalist and socialist models.

What is a Mixed Economic System?

A mixed economy blends the best aspects of both market economies (capitalism) and planned economies (socialism). Under this system, the government typically oversees or regulates sectors that are considered crucial for public welfare, such as healthcare, education, and national defense, while private businesses and individuals control most other industries. This structure allows for the free market’s efficiency in producing goods and services, while also ensuring that the government can step in to address social needs and correct market failures.

In practical terms, this means that, while private businesses compete in various industries, the government imposes regulations to ensure fairness, environmental protection, and public welfare. Public goods and services are funded by taxes, and certain industries, such as transportation and energy, may be owned or regulated by the government.

Key Characteristics of a Mixed Economic System

Private and Public Ownership

In a mixed economy, some industries and resources are privately owned, while others are controlled by the government. For example, a private company might produce consumer goods, while the government controls the military or infrastructure.

Government Regulation

The government plays a vital role in regulating the economy, ensuring market stability, consumer protection, and economic fairness. This can involve regulating prices, enforcing labor laws, ensuring environmental protections, and preventing monopolies.

Market Mechanism

A mixed economy still relies heavily on the market mechanism to allocate resources and determine prices. Supply and demand are the primary forces at play in most sectors, with prices fluctuating based on these forces. The government, however, can step in to regulate prices in cases of market failure.

Welfare Programs

Welfare programs such as unemployment benefits, public healthcare, and social security are typically part of a mixed economy. The government ensures that vulnerable populations are supported, which may not be adequately provided for in a purely capitalist system.

Socially Oriented Economic Goals

A mixed economic system often aims for equity, striving to reduce economic inequality. The government may redistribute wealth through progressive taxation and social services, aiming to ensure a more equitable distribution of resources.

Benefits of a Mixed Economic System

Balanced Growth

The combination of private entrepreneurship and public intervention often leads to more stable and sustainable economic growth. Private businesses foster innovation and efficiency, while government regulation ensures that these activities are in the public’s best interest.

Economic Stability

The government’s role in overseeing certain industries helps prevent the kind of extreme booms and busts that are sometimes seen in purely capitalist economies. By regulating key sectors and implementing counter-cyclical policies, the government can soften the impacts of economic downturns.

Social Welfare

A major advantage of the mixed economic system is the provision of social safety nets. Government involvement in healthcare, education, and social security programs ensures that basic needs are met for all citizens, reducing poverty and inequality.

Encourages Innovation with Social Responsibility

Private businesses in a mixed economy are incentivized to innovate and compete, driving economic growth. At the same time, the government can ensure that businesses do not harm society or the environment, encouraging sustainable business practices and ethical behavior.

Flexibility

A mixed economy is highly adaptable. Governments can adjust their level of intervention depending on the economic situation, which helps manage challenges such as inflation, unemployment, and market crashes.

Challenges of a Mixed Economic System

Government Overreach

One of the main criticisms of mixed economies is the potential for excessive government intervention. In some cases, governments may become too involved in the market, stifling innovation or leading to inefficiencies. Heavy regulation can sometimes slow down business growth or increase operating costs.

Inefficiency in Public Sectors

Government-run enterprises may not operate as efficiently as private ones, particularly in industries that don’t face competition. Public services, such as healthcare and education, can sometimes suffer from bureaucratic inefficiencies or a lack of incentives to improve.

Conflict Between Market and Government Interests

In a mixed economy, there can be conflicts between the goals of private businesses and the regulations imposed by the government. For example, private companies may seek to maximize profits, which can conflict with government regulations aimed at protecting the environment or consumers.

Tax Burden

Financing social programs and public services requires significant government spending, which often comes from taxes. In a mixed economy, high taxes on individuals and businesses are common to fund these services. While taxes are necessary, they can be a burden for businesses and individuals, reducing disposable income and economic growth.

Examples of Mixed Economic Systems

Many countries today operate under a mixed economic system, though the balance between market forces and government intervention varies.

United States: While largely capitalist, the U.S. government plays a regulatory role in areas like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Programs such as Social Security and Medicare provide social welfare.

Sweden: Known for its welfare state, Sweden combines a thriving market economy with extensive government-provided services like healthcare, education, and pensions, aiming to provide economic security to all citizens.

China: China is an example of a country where the government has a significant role in the economy, controlling sectors like energy, transportation, and heavy industries, while also encouraging private enterprise in areas like technology and consumer goods.

Conclusion

The mixed economic system offers a middle ground between the extremes of capitalism and socialism, combining the efficiency of free markets with the equity and welfare goals of government intervention. While it presents a balance of benefits, such as economic stability, social welfare, and innovation, it also faces challenges like government overreach and inefficiency in public sectors. Despite its flaws, the mixed economic system remains one of the most prevalent and adaptive economic models worldwide, providing a framework for addressing both economic growth and social responsibility.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Glendon

Economic

Gas prices are a powerful force in the global economy, influencing everything from consumer behavior to international trade. While many of us are aware of the direct impact of fluctuating gas prices on our daily commutes, the broader economic effects are far-reaching and can shape the financial landscape in profound ways. Whether prices rise or fall, the cost of gasoline has implications for consumer spending, business operations, inflation, trade balances, and even economic growth.

In this article, we’ll explore how gas prices affect the economy, breaking down their impact on various sectors and how these fluctuations ripple through both local and global markets.

The Role of Gas Prices in the Economy

Gasoline is a critical input for transportation and production, so changes in gas prices are felt across a wide range of economic activities. From filling up at the pump to the costs of shipping goods across the world, gas prices are central to the functioning of modern economies. A rise or fall in gas prices can alter consumer behavior, shift spending patterns, and influence the cost structures of businesses in virtually every industry.

Impact of Gas Prices on Consumers

1. Consumer Spending and Disposable Income

One of the most direct effects of rising gas prices is the reduction in disposable income. As consumers pay more at the pump, they have less money to spend on other goods and services. For households that rely on personal vehicles for transportation, an increase in gas prices can take up a significant portion of the budget, leading to decreased spending in other areas.

Higher fuel prices often result in reduced demand for non-essential goods, as consumers prioritize basic expenses like transportation and heating. Conversely, when gas prices fall, consumers are left with more disposable income, which can stimulate spending in other sectors, boosting demand for goods and services.

2. Inflationary Pressure

Gas prices are a major component of inflationary pressure. When fuel prices rise, the cost of transporting goods and services also increases, leading to higher overall prices for products. This effect, known as cost-push inflation, can cause the price of everything from groceries to electronics to increase, putting further strain on household budgets.

In contrast, falling gas prices can ease inflationary pressure by lowering transportation costs, allowing businesses to reduce prices or maintain margins. This, in turn, helps to stabilize consumer prices and reduce the overall cost of living.

Gas Prices and Business Operations

1. Operating Costs and Profit Margins

For many businesses, especially those in transportation, logistics, and manufacturing, gas prices are a significant part of their operating costs. Companies that rely on vehicles for delivery or fleet services, such as trucking companies, logistics firms, and public transportation, are directly impacted by fluctuations in gas prices. A rise in fuel prices can lead to higher operating expenses, forcing businesses to either absorb the costs or pass them on to consumers in the form of higher prices.

In industries like airlines, where fuel represents a major portion of operating costs, higher gas prices can lead to increased ticket prices and potentially reduced demand for air travel. On the other hand, when gas prices fall, businesses see relief in their cost structures, potentially leading to lower prices for goods and services, and an overall increase in profitability.

2. Consumer Demand for Goods and Services

As mentioned earlier, rising gas prices can reduce consumer spending, which in turn affects the demand for certain goods and services. For businesses in industries sensitive to consumer purchasing patterns, such as retail or restaurants, higher gas prices may cause a slowdown in demand. Consumers might cut back on discretionary spending or shift toward cheaper alternatives, affecting sales and profitability.

Conversely, falling gas prices can have the opposite effect, stimulating demand for goods and services and potentially leading to higher sales and revenue for businesses that rely on discretionary consumer spending.

The Impact of Gas Prices on Inflation and the Broader Economy

1. Monetary Policy and Interest Rates

Central banks, such as the Federal Reserve in the U.S., closely monitor gas prices as part of their broader economic strategy. Rising fuel costs can push inflation higher, prompting central banks to raise interest rates in an attempt to control inflation. Higher interest rates can slow down economic growth by making borrowing more expensive for businesses and consumers.

Conversely, if gas prices fall and inflation pressures ease, central banks may feel more comfortable keeping interest rates lower, which can stimulate borrowing and spending, fueling economic growth. Therefore, gas prices are a critical factor in shaping monetary policy and influencing the broader economic environment.

2. Global Trade and Supply Chains

The global nature of the oil market means that fluctuations in gas prices can also impact international trade. As gas prices rise, the cost of shipping goods across borders increases, which can lead to higher prices for imported products. For countries that are net importers of oil, higher gas prices can worsen trade imbalances by increasing the cost of imports.

In countries that are major oil producers, however, rising gas prices can be a boon, improving their trade balance and stimulating economic growth. On the other hand, falling gas prices can benefit importing countries by reducing transportation costs and improving the overall efficiency of global supply chains.

Gas Prices, Employment, and Economic Growth

Gas prices can also have indirect effects on employment and broader economic growth. High gas prices can slow down economic growth by reducing consumer spending and business investment. When businesses face higher costs due to rising fuel prices, they may delay hiring, postpone expansion, or cut back on production, all of which can lead to job losses and slower economic growth.

In contrast, falling gas prices can act as a stimulus for economic activity. With more disposable income in their pockets, consumers may increase spending, and businesses may invest more in expansion or hiring. The overall effect is a potential boost in employment and economic activity, helping to counterbalance periods of slow growth.

Conclusion: The Ripple Effect of Gas Prices

Gas prices are much more than just a cost at the pump. They are a key economic indicator with broad implications for consumer behavior, business operations, inflation, trade, and even monetary policy. Whether they rise or fall, fluctuations in gas prices create a ripple effect throughout the economy, influencing spending patterns, pricing decisions, and even economic growth.

In a world increasingly dependent on transportation and energy, understanding how gas prices affect the economy is crucial for both businesses and consumers alike. By recognizing the far-reaching impact of fuel price changes, individuals and policymakers can make more informed decisions about managing resources, adjusting spending habits, and navigating periods of economic uncertainty.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Warren Takunda

Central Bank

Economic

Markets are pricing in more by way of interest rate cuts at the Bank of England following news UK inflation fell to 2.5% in December from 2.6% while undershooting the consensus estimate for a 2.7% increase.

Bolstering expectations for rate cuts was the fall in services inflation - an all-important measure that the Bank watches - from 5.0% to 4.4%.

"The Bank will especially welcome the fall in services inflation," says Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs. "With monetary growth subdued, economic activity stalling, and the labour market weakening sharply, the Bank should cut rates again in February and keep cutting throughout the year."

Rising expectations for rate cuts have prompted a fall in UK bond yields, with the ten-year benchmark sliding from 4.90% on Tuesday to 4.809 in midweek trade, a move that has helped the Pound stabilise following a torrif few days.

Bank of England Tipped to Get Away With Four More Cuts_1

Above: UK ten-year bond yields (top panel) have fallen, leading to a rise in the pound.

George Buckley, an economist at Nomura, says service sector prices look to have lost momentum recently "and at current rates can be viewed as being compatible with meeting the 2% inflation target on an ongoing basis."

The Bank faces a slowing economy and rising unemployment, which can be partly mitigated by the support lower interest rates provide.

If the Bank is confident inflation will fall to target in the coming months it will continue to lower rates in order to help the economy.

UK money markets were positioned for approximately two interest rate cuts in 2025 amidst signs of persistent inflationary pressures, which would deny the Bank the ability to cut too fast.

Most economists have pencilled in four cuts for the year, judging the Bank will want to maintain a quarterly pace of cuts. These data push the probabilities towards this outcome.

Inflation to Hit 3% Before 2%

However, the Bank of England will struggle to deliver more than four cuts as it will be challenged by a potential rise in inflation in early 2025.

Importantly, December's data collection anomaly flatters the underlying picture. Robert Wood, Chief U.K. Economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, says December's inflation undershoot is "a temporary reprieve", and the reason the data undershot was because of an early ONS price collection date on December 10 which avoided some price increases later in then month.

Bank of England Tipped to Get Away With Four More Cuts_2

Above: The disinflation process in the UK has stalled well above the Bank of England's 2.0% target, limiting the scope for interest rate cuts to about 100 basis points.

The new government's budget will also have a significant impact going forward.

"Inflation to rise to around 3%, helped by budget decisions," says Nomura's Buckley, citing the following factors:

Unfavourable base effects

Rising energy prices

Increased bus fares from January)

VAT on school fees from January

Rise in alcohol duty from February

Higher water charges from Aprilrising vehicle excise duty from April

Higher national insurance contributions from April

A large rise in the national living wage, also due in April)

A rise in university tuition fees from October

The British Retail Consortium has released a survey today showing two-thirds of chief financial officers will pass on costs from the increase to employer national insurance contributions and other budget related costs.

More than half said they would reduce staff hours, including overtime, while 46% said they would reduce store headcount.

The Bank of England has warned it is still not sure how the tax increases will impact inflation, pondering whether firms will absorb the costs by accepting tighter margins or pass them on to customers, which would raise inflation.

The incoming survey suggest the latter, which will have implications for interest rates.

Research from the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) shows UK firms are having to make "difficult decisions" to manage the upcoming rises in national insurance contributions and the minimum wage.

Its latest survey shows most firms expect to raise their prices in the next three months, while business confidence has dipped to 2022 levels. Labour cost pressures have grown significantly and are particularly acute in the hospitality sector.

Source: Poundsterlinglive

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Glendon

Economic

Imagine living in a state where your paycheck isn't taxed at the state level. For many, the idea of avoiding state income tax sounds like a dream come true, offering more money in their pockets each month. While there are several states in the U.S. that do not impose a state income tax, the implications of living in such states go beyond the immediate financial benefits.

In this article, we’ll explore the states that do not have an income tax, examine the pros and cons of living in these states, and consider how they manage to fund their budgets without relying on income taxes.

States Without Income Tax: An Overview

As of 2025, nine states in the U.S. do not impose a state income tax on their residents:

Alaska

Florida

Nevada

South Dakota

Texas

Washington

Wyoming

Tennessee

(Note: Tennessee no longer taxes earned income but does tax dividends and interest income through the Hall Income Tax, which is set to be fully phased out by 2022)

New Hampshire

(Note: New Hampshire does not tax earned income but does tax interest and dividends)

These states rely on other forms of taxation and revenue generation to fund government programs and services. While the absence of a state income tax can offer substantial savings, the trade-off is that residents often face higher taxes in other areas, such as sales, property, and fuel taxes.

The Benefits of Living in States with No Income Tax

1. More Take-Home Pay

The most immediate and obvious benefit of living in a state with no income tax is the increase in take-home pay. Without state income tax deductions from your paycheck, you get to keep more of your earnings, which can have a significant impact on your overall financial situation. For example, in a state like California, where the state income tax rate can exceed 13%, living in a state without income tax could result in thousands of dollars more in your pocket every year.

2. Attractive to High-Income Earners

States without income tax are particularly attractive to high-income earners, entrepreneurs, and business owners. These individuals can benefit from the absence of income tax on large salaries, investments, and business profits, making these states an appealing destination for those looking to maximize their wealth.

3. Lower Cost of Living (In Some Cases)

In some instances, living in a no-income-tax state can also translate to a lower overall cost of living. While not universal, certain no-income-tax states, such as Texas and Wyoming, tend to have lower housing costs and utility prices compared to states with high income taxes like New York or California. Additionally, the overall tax burden in these states can be more predictable and easier to manage.

4. Potential for Business Growth and Investment

The absence of state income taxes can be beneficial for business owners. Without the pressure of income taxation, entrepreneurs have more capital available to reinvest in their businesses, which can lead to growth and expansion. This also makes states like Florida, Texas, and Nevada attractive to new businesses, especially in industries like technology, finance, and real estate.

The Drawbacks of Living in States with No Income Tax

1. Higher Sales and Property Taxes

While residents of states with no income tax enjoy a break in terms of direct taxation, these states often make up for the lost revenue through higher sales taxes and property taxes. For instance, in states like Washington and Texas, sales tax rates can be significantly higher than in states with income taxes. This means you may end up paying more on everyday purchases, from groceries to entertainment.

Additionally, property taxes can be steeper in no-income-tax states. For homeowners, this can result in higher annual property tax bills, especially in states with high property values like Texas and Florida.

2. Limited Social Services and Public Spending

States that rely on sales and property taxes to fund their budgets may have less to spend on public services, which can impact education, healthcare, and infrastructure. Without income taxes, these states may need to find alternative funding sources or cut costs, potentially leading to fewer public benefits or a lower quality of service. In some no-income-tax states, the trade-off may be a more limited social safety net.

For example, while Texas offers lower taxes, it also ranks poorly in terms of spending on public education, which can be a concern for families with school-age children.

3. Less State Revenue in Times of Economic Downturn

The reliance on sales and property taxes in no-income-tax states can be problematic during economic downturns. When people are spending less or property values decline, these revenue sources can take a significant hit, leading to budget shortfalls. This may result in budget cuts, a lack of public investment, or higher local taxes in certain regions to make up for the deficit.

4. Potential for Higher Local Taxes or Fees

To compensate for the lack of state income taxes, some no-income-tax states may rely more heavily on local taxes or fees. In cities or counties within these states, you might find higher local taxes on utilities, services, and even vehicle registrations. Residents may also face higher fees for certain government services, such as licensing and permits, which can offset the savings they would otherwise enjoy from no state income tax.

How Do States Without Income Tax Fund Their Budgets?

The absence of a state income tax does not mean that these states are without revenue. Here are some of the key ways they fund their budgets:

Sales Taxes: States without income tax often rely heavily on sales taxes. For example, Tennessee and Washington have some of the highest sales tax rates in the country.

Property Taxes: Many no-income-tax states rely on property taxes to fund local governments and services. States like Texas and Florida have relatively high property tax rates to make up for the lack of income tax.

Tourism and Natural Resources: States like Alaska and Nevada leverage tourism and natural resources as key revenue sources. Alaska, for example, benefits from its oil and gas industry, while Nevada thrives on tourism and gaming taxes.

Corporate Taxes and Fees: Some states without income tax, like Texas, use corporate taxes and business fees to generate additional revenue. Texas also benefits from its position as a business hub, drawing in companies that contribute to the tax base.

Conclusion: Is Living in a No-Income-Tax State Worth It?

Living in a state with no income tax can offer significant financial benefits, especially for high-income earners, entrepreneurs, and families who are able to take advantage of the tax savings. The ability to keep more of your paycheck is certainly attractive, but the higher sales, property, and local taxes, as well as potentially fewer public services, are important considerations.

Ultimately, whether living in a no-income-tax state is worth it depends on your personal financial situation, lifestyle preferences, and willingness to accept trade-offs in terms of public services and local taxes. As with any major decision, it’s important to weigh the pros and cons before making a move.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Warren Takunda

Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin could reach nearly $250,000 in 2025 as half a trillion dollars of new capital flows in.

In its latest weekly report on Jan. 14, onchain analytics platform CryptoQuant braced for the next Bitcoin price macro top.

BTC price should hit at least $145,000 — Research

Bitcoin is primed to hit at least $145,000 this year as the new US presidential administration sparks a mass capital influx, CryptoQuant said.

Discussing where BTC/USD may be headed, the firm flagged favorable US political and economic trends as the basis for a solid bull thesis.

“About $520 billion of fresh capital could flow into Bitcoin in 2025,” researchers calculated.

“In the context of favorable regulatory, monetary and cyclical conditions, it’s reasonable to expect capital to continue flowing into Bitcoin in 2025.” Bitcoin Inflows Under Trump Spark New $249K BTC Price Target for 2025_1

Bitcoin Inflows Under Trump Spark New $249K BTC Price Target for 2025_1

Bitcoin realized cap data (screenshot). Source: CryptoQuant

An accompanying chart shows Bitcoin’s realized market cap — the combined value of the supply as it moves onchain — since 2015. If the market follows historical patterns, CryptoQuant said, the $520 billion tally becomes attainable.

“Bitcoin could rise to $145k-$249k in 2025, given the expected capital inflows,” it continues.

“The expansion in the total capital invested in Bitcoin (realized capitalization) has a more-than-proportional effect on Bitcoin’s market value and price.” Bitcoin Inflows Under Trump Spark New $249K BTC Price Target for 2025_2

Bitcoin Inflows Under Trump Spark New $249K BTC Price Target for 2025_2

Bitcoin realized cap composition (screenshot). Source: CryptoQuant

CryptoQuant joins various bullish BTC price predictions for the coming year, some of which include a giant leap to the $1 million mark.

That came courtesy of Samson Mow, CEO of Bitcoin adoption firm JAN3, who in an interview with Cointelegraph late last year predicted the appearance of “omega” BTC price candles.

“You’ll start to go up by 10,000 a day or drop by 10,000 a day. And this is the God candle. After that, we’ll start to see Omega candles, which are 100,000 increments daily,” he said about future BTC/USD moves. Bitcoin Inflows Under Trump Spark New $249K BTC Price Target for 2025_3

Bitcoin Inflows Under Trump Spark New $249K BTC Price Target for 2025_3

Source: Samson Mow

Mow continues to tout the $1 million target for 2025 on social media.

Analyst compares Bitcoin to “beach ball” in January

Despite tagging two-month lows this week, Bitcoin is also fielding optimistic targets in the short term.

Ahead of US President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20, rumors are swirling over first-day announcements, which could set the tone for the rest of the crypto bull market.

“Standard stuff.... my feeling is that BTC is currently a bit of a beach ball under water with the legacy markets sitting on it for now,” Filbfilb, co-founder of trading suite DecenTrader, told Telegram channel subscribers about the latest BTC price action.

Filbfilb said that overly bearish sentiment across risk-assets, thanks to concerns over Fed policy, may be weighing on crypto market performance. Bitcoin Inflows Under Trump Spark New $249K BTC Price Target for 2025_4

Bitcoin Inflows Under Trump Spark New $249K BTC Price Target for 2025_4

BTC/USD 1-month chart. Source: Rekt Capital/X

“A case can still be made for a Monthly Bull Flag,” trader and analyst Rekt Capital added.

On daily timeframes, Rekt Capital described BTC/USD as going “from threatening a downside deviation To strongly rebounding and developing a new Higher Low.”

“Lots can change within 24 hours for Bitcoin,” he concluded.

Source: Cointelegraph

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Warren Takunda

Economic

Global markets treaded water on Wednesday ahead of U.S. consumer price data that could potentially shift the monetary policy outlook there, while investors waited to see if earnings of big banks would match sky-high expectations.

U.S. equity futures were mostly flat in Asia. Pan-European STOXX 50 futures edged up 0.1% and UK FTSE futures were 0.2% higher ahead of the British consumer inflation report, which could trigger another bout of selling in gilts.

In Asia, MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan eased 0.2%, while Japan's Nikkei swung between losses and gains and was last off 0.3%.

The big movers were the Japanese yen and yields. The dollar fell 0.4% to 157.3 yen as markets now see a 70% chance that the Bank of Japan will raise interest rates in January after its Governor Kazuo Ueda said policymakers would discuss such an option next week.

Ten-year Japanese government bond yields hit 1.255%, the highest since 2011.

For markets, much is riding on the U.S. CPI data due later on Wednesday. Forecasts are centred on a small 0.2% rise in the core measure, with risks skewed to the upside. A strong reading of 0.3% or more could see the relentless selling in global stocks and bonds resume.

"This CPI print is a pivot data point. A dovish print likely reignites the rally which is likely to get a boost from a strong earnings period," said analysts at JPMorgan in a note to clients.

"A hawkish print could see the 10Y yield make a run at 5%, increasing volatility across all asset classes, and continuing to pressure equities."

Overnight, U.S. producer price data for December was surprisingly tame, with the core measure flat in the month. That restrained the U.S. dollar and pulled short-term Treasury yields off their highs. The S&P 500 closed 0.1% higher.

Still, futures continued to price in just 29 basis points of easing from the Federal Reserve this year, with the first cut not fully priced in until September. While 10-year Treasury yields initially fell on the PPI data, they bounced back and ended the day just a tick lower than the high of 4.809%.

In Asia, the benchmark U.S. yield was off 1 bp at 4.778% on Wednesday.

Investors are also gearing up for U.S. fourth-quarter 2024 earnings, with results from some of the biggest U.S. banks - including Citi and JPMorgan - due on Wednesday. Lenders were expected to report stronger earnings, fueled by robust dealmaking and trading.

In Europe, the spotlight is again on the UK after concerns about its fiscal outlook pummelled government bonds to 16-year lows. The local CPI report is due on Wednesday and is expected to show headline inflation remained steady at 2.6% last month.

The pound slipped 0.1% to $1.2198, just a touch above a one-year low of $1.2099.

In commodities markets, oil prices were higher after ending Tuesday more than 1% lower.

U.S. crude rose 0.5% to $77.92 a barrel and Brent was 0.4% higher at $80.21.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Warren Takunda

Economic

UK Inflation unexpectedly fell in December, a move that is likely fuel pressure on the Bank of England to cut interest rates again next month.

Inflation, as measured by the consumer prices index, was 2.5% in the year to December, the Office for National Statistics said on Wednesday, largely as a result of easing price pressures in the services sector, which accounts for around 80% of the British economy.

That was down from 2.6% the previous month. Economists had expected no change in the annual rate.

Although inflation has fallen, it remains above the Bank of England's target of 2%.

If the Bank of England decides to cut its main interest rate from 4.75%, it could well ease the pressure in British government bond markets, which have been volatile in recent weeks.

The rise in the interest rate investors are charging the British government to borrow money over 10 years hit a 16-year high in recent days, piling pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves to cut spending or raise taxes in order to allay concerns.

Inflation is down from levels seen a couple of years ago. That comes after central banks raised borrowing costs after their near zero levels following the 2008 banking crisis and covering the corona virus pandemic period. Prices during the latter period started to shoot up, first as a result of supply chain issues and then because of Russia's invasion of Ukraine which led to energy prices soaring.

Hopes for an interest rate drop

Commenting on the figures, Capital Economics' deputy chief UK economist Ruth Gregory said: "While a lot of the surprisingly large fall in services inflation from 5.0% in November to 4.4% in December (CE forecast 4.8%, BoE 4.7%) was due to a very sharp fall in airfares, underlying price pressures still appear a bit more favourable than we had thought.

"Our forecast is that CPI inflation will rebound in January, perhaps to almost 3.0% and that inflation will be a bit higher than most expect in the first half of this year. But we expect it to drop below the 2% target next year as the persistence of inflation fades further.

"Overall, next Tuesday’s release of the wage growth figures for November will shed more light, but for now, we remain content with our forecast that the Bank will cut rates from 4.75% to 4.50% in February."

Kyle Chapman, FX Markets Analyst at Ballinger Group said: "Policymakers will welcome the big unexpected drop in services inflation, and it underlines my view that the market is underestimating the pace of the BOE's cutting path this year. Hotels were the largest downward contributor, however, and this has been a particularly volatile component."

Source: Euronews

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

Mixed Economic System: Characteristics, Benefits, and Challenges

What is a Mixed Economic System?

Key Characteristics of a Mixed Economic System

Private and Public Ownership

Government Regulation

Market Mechanism

Welfare Programs

Socially Oriented Economic Goals

Benefits of a Mixed Economic System

Balanced Growth

Economic Stability

Social Welfare

Encourages Innovation with Social Responsibility

Flexibility

Challenges of a Mixed Economic System

Government Overreach

Inefficiency in Public Sectors

Conflict Between Market and Government Interests

Tax Burden

Examples of Mixed Economic Systems

Conclusion

How Rising and Falling Gas Prices Impact Our Economy

The Role of Gas Prices in the Economy

Impact of Gas Prices on Consumers

1. Consumer Spending and Disposable Income

2. Inflationary Pressure

Gas Prices and Business Operations

1. Operating Costs and Profit Margins

2. Consumer Demand for Goods and Services

The Impact of Gas Prices on Inflation and the Broader Economy

1. Monetary Policy and Interest Rates

2. Global Trade and Supply Chains

Gas Prices, Employment, and Economic Growth

Conclusion: The Ripple Effect of Gas Prices

Bank of England Tipped to Get Away With Four More Cuts

Above: UK ten-year bond yields (top panel) have fallen, leading to a rise in the pound.

Inflation to Hit 3% Before 2%

Above: The disinflation process in the UK has stalled well above the Bank of England's 2.0% target, limiting the scope for interest rate cuts to about 100 basis points.

Source: Poundsterlinglive

Living in States With No Income Tax: Is It Really Worth the Savings

States Without Income Tax: An Overview

The Benefits of Living in States with No Income Tax

1. More Take-Home Pay

2. Attractive to High-Income Earners

3. Lower Cost of Living (In Some Cases)

4. Potential for Business Growth and Investment

The Drawbacks of Living in States with No Income Tax

1. Higher Sales and Property Taxes

2. Limited Social Services and Public Spending

3. Less State Revenue in Times of Economic Downturn

4. Potential for Higher Local Taxes or Fees

How Do States Without Income Tax Fund Their Budgets?

Conclusion: Is Living in a No-Income-Tax State Worth It?

Bitcoin Inflows Under Trump Spark New $249K BTC Price Target for 2025

BTC price should hit at least $145,000 — Research

Bitcoin realized cap data (screenshot). Source: CryptoQuant

Bitcoin realized cap composition (screenshot). Source: CryptoQuant

Source: Samson Mow

Analyst compares Bitcoin to “beach ball” in January

BTC/USD 1-month chart. Source: Rekt Capital/X

Source: Cointelegraph

Traders Mark Time Ahead of US CPI, Bank Earnings

Source: Reuters

UK Inflation in Surprise Dip in December, Raising Hopes Over Bond Market Fears

Hopes for an interest rate drop

Risk Disclosure