Market Analysis: GBP/USD Edges Higher As EUR/GBP Loses Ground

FXOpen

Economic

Forex

Technical Analysis

Summary:

GBP/USD is attempting a fresh increase above the 1.3270 resistance. EUR/GBP declined steadily below the 0.8460 and 0.8440 support levels.Important Takeaways for GBP/USD and EUR/GBP Analysis Today...

GBP/USD is attempting a fresh increase above the 1.3270 resistance. EUR/GBP declined steadily below the 0.8460 and 0.8440 support levels.

Important Takeaways for GBP/USD and EUR/GBP Analysis Today

●The British Pound is attempting a fresh increase above 1.3250.

●There was a break above a key bearish trend line with resistance at 1.3270 on the hourly chart of GBP/USD at FXOpen.

●EUR/GBP is trading in a bearish zone below the 0.8460 pivot level.

●There was a break above a connecting bearish trend line with resistance near 0.8410 on the hourly chart at FXOpen.

GBP/USD Technical Analysis

On the hourly chart of GBP/USD at FXOpen, the pair declined after it failed to clear the 1.3440 resistance. As mentioned in the previous analysis, the British Pound traded below the 1.3200 support against the US Dollar.

Finally, the pair tested the 1.3140 zone and is currently attempting a fresh increase. The bulls were able to push the pair above the 50-hour simple moving average and 1.3215.

There was a break above a key bearish trend line with resistance at 1.3270. The pair surpassed the 50% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the 1.3402 swing high to the 1.3139 low. It is now showing positive signs above 1.3300.

On the upside, the GBP/USD chart indicates that the pair is facing resistance near 1.3340 and the 76.4% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the 1.3402 swing high to the 1.3139 low.

The next major resistance is near 1.3400. A close above the 1.3400 resistance zone could open the doors for a move toward 1.3440. Any more gains might send GBP/USD toward 1.3500.

On the downside, immediate support is near 1.3270. If there is a downside break below 1.3270, the pair could accelerate lower. The first major support is near the 1.3215 level and the 50-hour simple moving average.

The next key support is seen near 1.3140, below which the pair could test 1.3080. Any more losses could lead the pair toward the 1.3000 support.

EUR/GBP Technical Analysis

On the hourly chart of EUR/GBP at FXOpen, the pair started a fresh decline from well above 0.8500. The Euro traded below the 0.8430 level and tested 0.8400. It is now consolidating losses and trading below the 50-hour simple moving average. However, there was a break above a connecting bearish trend line with resistance near 0.8410.

The pair is now facing resistance near the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the 0.8522 swing high to the 0.8399 low at 0.8430.

The next major resistance could be 0.8460. It coincides with the 50% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the 0.8522 swing high to the 0.8399 low. The main resistance is near the 0.8495 zone. A close above the 0.8495 level might accelerate gains. In the stated case, the bulls may perhaps aim for a test of 0.8520. Any more gains might send the pair toward the 0.8550 level.

Immediate support sits near 0.8400. The next major support is near 0.8365. A downside break below the 0.8365 support might call for more downsides. In the stated case, the pair could drop toward the 0.8300 support level.

Source: FXOpen

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Japan Emerges as a Financial Safe Haven Amid Global Volatility

April 2025 witnessed an unprecedented influx of foreign capital into Japan, as international investors turned to the country’s financial markets in response to mounting uncertainty in the United States. According to data from Japan’s Ministry of Finance, foreign investors purchased a net 8.2 trillion yen (approximately $57 billion) in Japanese securities—marking the highest monthly figure since recordkeeping began in 2005 and over three times the 20-year April average.

This surge included $25.5 billion in equities—also the most since April 2023—and $31.5 billion in long-term government bonds, the highest since July 2022. Market analysts report that a significant portion of this bond buying came from global central banks seeking to diversify their foreign reserves, accelerating what many see as a steady "de-dollarization" trend.

Flight from the U.S. Dollar Accelerates

Yujiro Goto, head of FX strategy at Nomura, noted that April’s bond purchases far exceeded seasonal trends and were particularly notable for coinciding with a parallel boom in stock investments. This dual movement suggests that international investors are not simply reallocating funds—they are executing a strategic retreat from U.S. assets.

Mansoor Mohi-uddin, Chief Economist at the Bank of Singapore, believes the rush into Japanese assets reflects growing anxiety over U.S. policy unpredictability. Rising trade tensions, aggressive tariff policies, and public attacks by President Trump on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell have rattled global confidence.

“Japan is clearly benefiting from the broader de-dollarization sentiment,” said Mohi-uddin. “Central banks looking to diversify are drawn to markets with high liquidity and relative policy stability—and Japan fits that profile.”

Trump’s Tariff Pause Eases Pressure, But Outlook Remains Clouded

The situation stabilized somewhat in early May after President Trump agreed to a 90-day pause on additional tariffs targeting Chinese goods. This helped calm short-term volatility, but analysts remain uncertain whether the surge in Japanese asset purchases will persist.

According to Bank of America’s latest global fund manager survey released on May 9, most institutional investors now expect Trump’s economic policies to lead the U.S. toward a stagflation scenario—simultaneously rising inflation and slowing growth. The survey also found that shorting the U.S. dollar has become the most crowded trade among fund managers since Trump introduced retaliatory tariffs.

Yet Bank of America cautioned that despite growing criticism of U.S. economic leadership, the dollar’s dominance remains intact in absolute terms. Compared to alternatives like the euro or yen, the dollar still enjoys unmatched liquidity, global acceptance, and network effects.

Can Japan Maintain the Momentum?

The key question now is whether Japan’s role as a capital magnet is a temporary reaction or the beginning of a longer-term structural shift. If investor distrust in U.S. policy deepens—particularly with persistent Fed inaction on rates—Japan may continue to benefit from a reallocation of global capital.

With a large, liquid financial market and relatively stable monetary policy, Japan is uniquely positioned to serve as a safe alternative for global investors weary of geopolitical noise and monetary instability elsewhere.

April’s record-setting inflow into Japan may be the clearest sign yet that global investors are actively repositioning away from the U.S. in search of stability. Whether this marks a lasting transformation in the international financial order or a short-term hedge remains to be seen, but Japan has re-emerged as a focal point for global capital in uncertain times.

Source: FT

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Political

Trump Ends U.S. Sanctions on Syria Amid Middle East Diplomacy Tour

In a sweeping policy move, President Donald Trump declared the full removal of U.S. sanctions on Syria, marking the first such action in over a decade. Speaking at the Saudi Investment Forum in Riyadh, Trump framed the decision as a necessary step to "give Syria a chance to achieve greatness" following the collapse of the Assad regime in late 2024.

According to CNN, the announcement came after discussions with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan. The move also coincides with Trump’s broader Middle East trip, which has so far been heavily focused on investment, diplomacy, and regional stabilization.

A Shift After Years of Isolation

“This country has seen enough tragedy, war, and death,” Trump said, referring to Syria’s decade-long conflict. “It’s time for Syria to shine. Good luck, Syria—show us something remarkable.”

The president emphasized that while sanctions were once necessary to pressure the Assad regime, their continued application was no longer appropriate under Syria’s new interim leadership, led by President Ahmed al-Sharaa. Trump is scheduled to meet al-Sharaa on May 14 during his stay in Saudi Arabia.

The U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is also expected to hold talks with Syria’s Foreign Minister Asaad Al-Shaibani in Turkey later this week—marking the first direct diplomatic contact between Washington and Damascus since relations deteriorated under Bashar al-Assad’s rule.

Damascus Welcomes the Reversal

Foreign Minister Al-Shaibani welcomed the news, calling the sanctions removal “a fresh start on the path to national reconstruction.” He praised support from regional allies—particularly Saudi Arabia—as instrumental in securing the U.S. policy reversal. “We are now opening a new chapter that honors the history and dignity of the Syrian people,” he said.

This move by Washington follows partial sanction rollbacks earlier this year by the United Kingdom and the European Union, though neither has gone as far as a complete lifting.

Strategic Implications and Cautious Optimism

Trump’s announcement is not without controversy. Critics are likely to question whether the new Syrian leadership has met the necessary benchmarks for democratic transition or human rights guarantees. Still, the White House insists the change in U.S. policy is contingent on Syria’s successful path to internal stabilization and constructive international engagement.

While Trump’s rhetoric emphasized peace and economic revival, the geopolitical calculus is also evident. Syria’s reintegration into regional diplomacy—particularly with Gulf states taking the lead—may be part of a broader U.S. effort to reposition itself amid waning influence and shifting alliances in the Middle East.

With Israel launching airstrikes near the Syrian presidential compound earlier this week and ongoing tensions involving Iranian proxies, the situation remains fragile. Whether this diplomatic thaw leads to a sustainable peace or triggers new regional friction remains to be seen.

Nonetheless, for the first time in over ten years, the door to normalized U.S.-Syria relations is no longer closed.

Source: The Economic Times

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

China–U.S. Trade War

Economic

Rising U.S.-EU Trade Tensions Amid a Warming U.S.-China Thaw

Just hours after announcing a significant tariff de-escalation deal with China, President Donald Trump launched a sharp rebuke of the European Union. Speaking from the White House on May 12, Trump accused the EU of treating the United States "worse than China" in matters of trade, citing unfair practices and repeated lawsuits against American tech giants like Apple, Google, and Meta.

The timing of the remarks was notable. Following the temporary 90-day tariff reduction agreement between Washington and Beijing—cutting U.S. duties on Chinese goods from 145% to 30% and China's duties on U.S. goods from 125% to 10%—markets had begun stabilizing. Yet, instead of reinforcing transatlantic ties, Trump pivoted to attacking Brussels over longstanding trade grievances, particularly in autos, agriculture, and digital services.

Trump’s Strategy: Pressure Before Concession

Trump’s rhetoric echoed a familiar pattern: apply maximum pressure before securing concessions. He claimed that the U.S. holds all the leverage in talks and suggested that the EU must open its markets wider to American exports, especially cars and farm goods. EU officials, however, warned that if talks collapse, retaliatory tariffs could affect as much as €95 billion in U.S. goods.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made clear she would only meet Trump if substantive trade proposals are on the table. While Brussels has offered limited concessions, including joint efforts to curb industrial overcapacity from China, it remains wary of Trump's protectionist posture.

Economic Risks on Both Sides of the Atlantic

Despite their disagreements, the U.S. and EU maintain one of the largest bilateral economic relationships in the world—valued at nearly $1 trillion annually. Their mutual interests span advanced manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, finance, and clean tech. Yet, these sectors are increasingly strained by competing subsidies, divergent regulations, and disputes over digital taxation.

According to Bruegel, a leading European think tank, a full-scale trade war could reduce U.S. GDP by 0.7% and EU GDP by 0.3% in 2025. This potential cost would come on top of existing inflationary pressures and supply chain vulnerabilities that have already strained businesses on both continents.

U.S. industries like automotive and semiconductor manufacturing are deeply integrated with European suppliers. Tariff escalations could disrupt production flows and raise costs—especially damaging as the U.S. seeks to decouple from China in critical industries.

Strategic Fallout: Risking Unity Against China

At a time when both the U.S. and EU are attempting to reduce their economic reliance on China, Trump’s aggressive stance risks undermining allied coordination. The two powers have jointly imposed export controls on AI, semiconductors, and telecommunications hardware aimed at limiting China’s access to strategic technologies.

However, if Trump continues to antagonize the EU, Brussels may shift toward a more autonomous economic strategy, potentially strengthening its commercial ties with Beijing. This would complicate Washington’s goal of isolating China within the global tech and trade order.

Moreover, retaliatory EU tariffs or restrictions on key exports—such as rare earths or battery materials—could deepen U.S. supply chain risks. A breakdown in trust could also make it harder to align on sanctions, cybersecurity cooperation, or defense of the multilateral rules-based trading system.

Trump’s Political Calculus vs. Global Stability

Trump’s push for trade concessions may appeal to segments of the American electorate concerned about manufacturing decline and foreign competition. However, the collateral damage of antagonizing close allies could outweigh any short-term domestic political gains. His “America First” doctrine remains popular with his base but continues to unsettle global partners and fuel perceptions of U.S. unreliability.

Trump’s approach hinges on brinkmanship—creating the threat of escalation to extract deals. But with Europe, such tactics could backfire, triggering a protectionist spiral at a time when both sides need to present a united front against China’s expanding economic influence.

Whether the U.S. and EU can overcome their current trade tensions will depend on upcoming negotiations. Both sides remain fundamentally aligned on key strategic goals, but diverging methods and Trump’s combative posture risk driving a wedge in the relationship. If not managed carefully, this rift could hinder collective efforts to shape the global economic future amid the growing challenge from Beijing.

Source: Politico

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Business and Politics Intertwined in Trump's Middle East Strategy

President Donald Trump's current diplomatic tour of the Middle East—featuring stops in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar—comes amid a wave of new business deals secured by his family across the region. The timing, optics, and financial stakes of this overlap have reignited a debate about the integrity of U.S. foreign policy under Trump’s leadership.

While Trump publicly frames the visit as a mission to secure investment for the American economy, his sons Eric and Donald Jr. have recently traveled the same region on behalf of The Trump Organization, pursuing major developments including an 80-story Trump Tower in Dubai and new luxury real estate projects in Saudi Arabia and Oman. At the same time, the family’s cryptocurrency venture, World Liberty Financial, gained traction when its stablecoin was selected to back a $2 billion investment in Binance by a state-backed Abu Dhabi fund.

From Luxury Towers to Crypto Finance: A Growing Web of Interests

Eric Trump’s announcement of Trump Tower Dubai and participation in a high-profile cryptocurrency conference—alongside family-linked crypto entrepreneur Zach Witkoff—illustrates how deeply embedded the Trump brand has become in Gulf business networks. The family is partnering with Qatari Diar on a golf resort in Doha and with Saudi firm Dar Global on multiple developments in Riyadh and Jeddah.

A particularly controversial development is the adoption of the Trumps' stablecoin, USD, by a UAE investment company for large-scale crypto dealings—raising questions about whether family-affiliated ventures could profit directly from foreign financial movements.

These activities accompany existing ties with Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), most notably through the LIV Golf tour, which has hosted events at Trump resorts and maintains close financial ties to the president’s orbit.

Ethical Lines and Policy Risk

Critics argue that Trump’s dual role as president and patriarch of a business empire invites potential conflicts of interest. Jon Hoffman of the Cato Institute described the situation as a “glaring” conflict, especially with PIF's increasing influence in U.S. sports and tech sectors. Trump’s announced acceptance of a $400 million Boeing 747 jet from Qatar—presented as a "gesture"—further complicates perceptions of influence and reciprocity.

Timothy Carney of the American Enterprise Institute noted that even without daily involvement in the family business, Trump’s personal wealth is directly tied to its success. The concern, he emphasized, is that policy choices may be implicitly shaped by how other nations treat his family’s commercial interests.

White House Defends Trump’s Conduct

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed concerns about conflicts of interest as “ridiculous,” asserting that Trump complies with all relevant ethics laws. The Trump Organization's current ethics agreement allows deals with foreign private firms but bars direct agreements with foreign governments—a shift from the stricter ethics pact of his first term.

Still, the distinction has done little to quiet criticism. Observers point out that many of the Middle East deals—particularly in Saudi Arabia and the UAE—involve companies closely linked to state leadership or sovereign funds, muddying the line between private and political actors.

Quid Pro Quo Investment Diplomacy

Trump has openly framed the itinerary of his foreign travel around investment promises. His decision to visit Saudi Arabia first, as in his initial term, was reportedly linked to the kingdom’s pledge to invest up to $1 trillion in U.S. businesses—later clarified to $600 billion by the White House. The UAE has announced a $1.4 trillion U.S. investment pledge over the next decade, while Qatar's royal family is offering Trump a private aircraft.

While the administration describes these developments as economic diplomacy, the coordination with family business activity suggests a broader strategy of blending personal branding with presidential influence.

A Longstanding Relationship with Gulf Wealth

Trump’s commercial ties to the Middle East stretch back to 2005, with mixed success. His flagship project, Trump Tower Dubai, was shelved. However, his collaboration with DAMAC Properties has been fruitful, including the 2017 opening of Trump International Golf Club Dubai. Notably, Emirati billionaire Hussain Sajwani, a longtime partner, announced a $20 billion U.S. data center investment alongside Trump in January—while standing beside him at Mar-a-Lago.

Sajwani himself summed up the relationship by saying, “It’s been amazing news for me and my family when he was elected,” underscoring the mutual gains between Gulf investors and the Trump empire.

Trump’s Middle East visit underscores the complex entanglement of statecraft and personal enterprise. With his children advancing real estate and digital currency ventures across the Gulf and key deals tied to sovereign-linked firms, the appearance of blurred boundaries is difficult to ignore.

Source: AP

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Public Sector Drives Wage Growth Uptick in Early 2025

Australia's wage growth modestly accelerated in the March quarter, according to data released Wednesday by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. National wages rose 0.9% quarter-on-quarter—slightly above consensus forecasts of 0.8%—largely due to one-off wage increases in government-supported sectors such as aged care and childcare.

Annual wage growth ticked up to 3.4% from 3.2% in Q4 2024, with public sector pay rebounding sharply to 3.6% after a temporary dip in the previous quarter. In contrast, private sector wage growth remained flat at 3.3%, well below its 2024 peak of 4.2%, indicating that overall wage momentum remains uneven and policy-driven.

Private Sector Remains Subdued Despite Tight Labour Market

Despite continued strength in employment, wage gains in market-driven sectors remain weak. Industries such as retail, hospitality, and telecommunications posted only marginal increases—just 0.1% in the quarter—suggesting that structural wage pressures are limited and not yet aligned with broader labour market tightness.

Sean Langcake of Oxford Economics Australia noted that Q1’s wage strength was largely temporary and policy-induced, not the result of sustained economic demand. “The labour market is tight, but wage growth is relatively well-contained,” he observed, reinforcing expectations for a near-term rate cut by the Reserve Bank of Australia.

RBA Poised to Cut Rates Amid Inflation Relief

With inflation moderating and wage growth appearing manageable, markets remain confident the RBA will deliver a 25-basis-point rate cut at its May 20 policy meeting, bringing the cash rate down to 3.85%. Headline consumer price inflation held steady at 2.4% in Q1, while core inflation, measured by the trimmed mean, slowed to 2.9%—returning to the central bank’s target range of 2–3% for the first time since late 2021.

This inflation development gives the RBA greater flexibility. However, the bank remains cautious, particularly over concerns that other broader measures of labour costs may be heating up in the face of persistently weak productivity—a combination that could reverse inflation gains if left unchecked.

Jobs Data to Confirm Labour Market Resilience

All eyes now turn to April employment figures due Thursday, which are expected to show a net increase of 20,000 jobs, keeping the unemployment rate steady at 4.1%. Should this materialize, it would confirm ongoing strength in job creation, even as wage growth slows—offering the RBA a clearer path to ease monetary policy without risking overheating.

Australia’s Q1 wage data presents a mixed picture: temporary wage boosts in the public sector contrast with soft private-sector growth. With inflation easing and labour conditions stable, the RBA is widely expected to lower interest rates in May.

Still, the central bank will closely monitor wage dynamics and productivity trends in the months ahead, especially as the effects of U.S. trade policy and global economic volatility ripple through the domestic economy. For now, however, the data supports a cautious but proactive monetary policy pivot.

Source: Reuters

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

FastBull Featured

Daily News

[Quick Facts]

1. Germany's economy to continue declining under impact of U.S. tariff.

2. U.S. and Ukraine sign supplementary documents for Minerals Agreement.

3. U.S. oil industry struggles.

4. Villeroy: ECB may cut rates again by summer.

5. U.S. Bipartisan Policy Center delays debt ceiling "X-Date" projection to August–October.

6. China adjusts tariff measures on U.S. imports to implement key consensus from high-level trade talks.

[News Details]

Germany's economy to continue declining under impact of U.S. tariff

A latest report released on May 13th by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) states that the German economy remains in recession, with economic output projected to decline by 0.2% this year. This follows contractions in both 2023 and 2024. The report highlights that Germany is severely affected by U.S. tariff policies and global uncertainties, with consumers remaining cautious about major purchases.

U.S. and Ukraine sign supplementary documents for Minerals Agreement

Ukraine and the U.S. have signed supplementary implementation documents to a long-anticipated minerals agreement, a critical demand by U.S. President Trump to sustain military aid to Ukraine. This step finalizes a major profit-sharing deal aimed at securing U.S. investment opportunities in Ukraine. Ukraine's Ministry of Economy announced in Kyiv on Tuesday that two documents outlining the operational mechanisms of a jointly established investment fund were signed. The fund, part of a previously approved mineral resources agreement by Ukraine's parliament, will be financed through tax shares from new mining licenses and other payments, while the U.S. may contribute via financial investments or military assistance.

U.S. oil industry struggles

The U.S. oil sector, battered by the dual blow of government tariffs and plummeting oil prices, is facing severe challenges, particularly for smaller producers. Reports indicate that indiscriminate U.S. tariffs have harmed domestic oil companies, which rely heavily on equipment imported from South Korea, Brazil, and Mexico. Industry consultancy data predicts a 40% year-on-year surge in steel pipe prices by Q4 2025. Kirk Edwards, former president of the Permian Basin Petroleum Association, criticized the industry's role as a "scapegoat" in U.S. tariff policies. Smaller independent producers, unlike giants like ExxonMobil and Chevron, are especially vulnerable, with recent weeks seeing $1.8 billion in spending cuts announced across the sector.

Villeroy: ECB may cut rates again by summer

ECB Governing Council member Villeroy stated that the central bank may lower borrowing costs again by summer, as trade tensions have not exacerbated inflation in the eurozone. In an interview with regional media EBRA on Tuesday, Villeroy remarked, "The Trump administration's protectionism will lead to a restart of inflation in the United States, but not in Europe, which will likely allow for another rate cut by the summer." The impact of Trump's tariffs on the eurozone's G20 economies will shape the ECB's rate path. Since June 2024, the ECB has cut rates seven times. While some officials support another move next month and remain open to further easing, others urge caution, citing potential inflation risks. The ECB's next monetary policy meetings are scheduled for June 6th and July 24th.

U.S. Bipartisan Policy Center delays debt ceiling "X-Date" projection to August–October

The U.S. Bipartisan Policy Center has revised its forecast for the federal government's debt ceiling deadline, now predicting that the so-called "X-date"—when the Treasury can no longer pay all bills—will fall between August and early October if Congress fails to suspend or raise the debt limit. The Washington-based think tank's previous estimate was two months earlier. The update reflects the Treasury's latest revenue and spending data. Shai Akabas, the center's vice president of economic policy, said there was a significant risk that tax season revenues could come in far below expectations, pushing the X-date as early as June during a briefing ahead of the release, hinting that the worst-case scenario did not materialize. The center noted that stronger-than-expected April tax revenues provided short-term support to the Treasury's cash balance, sharply reducing the threat of an X-date in June or July.

China adjusts tariff measures on U.S. imports to implement key consensus from high-level trade talks

The China-U.S. high-level meeting on economic and trade affairs was held in Geneva, Switzerland during, May 10th and 11th. On May 12th, the Joint Statement of the China-U.S. Economic and Trade Talks in Geneva was released, with both sides achieving positive consensus, including commitments to implement relevant measures by May 14th.

On May 12 (U.S. Eastern Time), the U.S. government issued an executive order to adjust its tariff measures on Chinese goods, effective from 00:01 a.m. ET on May 14th. In response and to implement the key consensus from the talks, China's Customs Tariff Commission announced adjustments to its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports. Effective from 12:01 p.m. Beijing time on May 14th, the additional tariff rate under Announcement No. 4 (2025) of the Customs Tariff Commission will be reduced from 34% to 10%, with a 24% portion suspended for 90 days. Additionally, the retaliatory measures outlined in Announcement No. 5 (2025) and Announcement No. 6 (2025) of the Customs Tariff Commission will be terminated.

The substantial mutual tariff reductions align with the expectations of producers and consumers in both nations, fostering stronger bilateral economic ties and benefiting the global economy. Chinese authorities also stated that other non-tariff countermeasures imposed after April 2nd in response to U.S. tariffs will be temporarily paused or revoked in the near future.

[Today's Focus]

UTC+8 15:05 Deputy Governor of the Bank of England Breeden speaks

UTC+8 17:15 Federal Reserve Governor Waller speaks

UTC+8 21:10 Federal Reserve Vice Chair Jefferson speaks

TBD OPEC releases Monthly Oil Market Report

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Recent Searches

Top Searches

Markets

News

Analysis

User

24/7

Economic Calendar

Education

Data

Market Analysis: GBP/USD Edges Higher As EUR/GBP Loses Ground

Important Takeaways for GBP/USD and EUR/GBP Analysis Today

GBP/USD Technical Analysis

EUR/GBP Technical Analysis

Source: FXOpen

Global Investors Dump U.S. Assets and Flock to Japan: What’s Driving the Shift?

Japan Emerges as a Financial Safe Haven Amid Global Volatility

Flight from the U.S. Dollar Accelerates

Trump’s Tariff Pause Eases Pressure, But Outlook Remains Clouded

Can Japan Maintain the Momentum?

Source: FT

Trump Lifts All Sanctions on Syria, Calling for a “New Era” of U.S.-Syria Relations

Trump Ends U.S. Sanctions on Syria Amid Middle East Diplomacy Tour

A Shift After Years of Isolation

Damascus Welcomes the Reversal

Strategic Implications and Cautious Optimism

Source: The Economic Times

Trump Turns His Fire on Europe: Is Strategic Pressure Jeopardizing U.S.-EU Unity?

Rising U.S.-EU Trade Tensions Amid a Warming U.S.-China Thaw

Trump’s Strategy: Pressure Before Concession

Economic Risks on Both Sides of the Atlantic

Strategic Fallout: Risking Unity Against China

Trump’s Political Calculus vs. Global Stability

Source: Politico

Trump’s Middle East Visit Sparks Ethical Questions as Family Deepens Business and Crypto Deals in Region

Business and Politics Intertwined in Trump's Middle East Strategy

From Luxury Towers to Crypto Finance: A Growing Web of Interests

Ethical Lines and Policy Risk

White House Defends Trump’s Conduct

Quid Pro Quo Investment Diplomacy

A Longstanding Relationship with Gulf Wealth

Source: AP

Australia’s Q1 Wage Growth Accelerates on Public Sector Boost, But Private Sector Remains Tame

Public Sector Drives Wage Growth Uptick in Early 2025

Private Sector Remains Subdued Despite Tight Labour Market

RBA Poised to Cut Rates Amid Inflation Relief

Jobs Data to Confirm Labour Market Resilience

Source: Reuters

May 14th Financial News

[Quick Facts]

[News Details]

[Today's Focus]

Risk Disclosure