China's AI Chip Ambitions Confront U.S. Export Curbs: Progress, Roadblocks, and Strategic Shifts

Economic

Summary:

:Despite aggressive U.S.-led export restrictions, China is accelerating efforts to build its own AI semiconductor ecosystem. While strides have been made in chip design...

The High Stakes of AI Autonomy

The race to dominate artificial intelligence is increasingly framed by geopolitical competition—particularly between the U.S. and China. With Washington intensifying export controls on AI-critical semiconductors, China has responded with a policy-driven surge in domestic innovation. However, creating a self-reliant AI chip supply chain remains a complex and uneven journey.

Export restrictions imposed by the U.S. not only prevent Chinese companies from acquiring Nvidia’s top-tier AI chips but also block access to the very tools and know-how needed to manufacture competitive alternatives. In effect, China is simultaneously pushed toward innovation and denied the infrastructure to scale it—especially in areas such as lithography and high-efficiency fabrication.

Chip Design: Huawei Leads the Domestic Charge

China’s strongest advances are visible in the design phase. While Nvidia remains the global benchmark, Chinese firms—particularly Huawei’s HiSilicon—are closing the gap. Huawei’s Ascend 910B and the anticipated 910C show performance improvements, reducing the lag from two years to just one generation behind Nvidia’s H20.

This progress suggests that China’s GPU design capabilities are maturing, aided by government subsidies and a surge in AI chip startups like Enflame and Biren Technology. But even with design breakthroughs, the real challenge lies downstream in fabrication and yield efficiency.

Fabrication: SMIC’s Technological Ceiling

Manufacturing remains China’s weak link. SMIC, the country’s most advanced chip foundry, is limited to 7nm processes—far behind Taiwan’s TSMC, which has moved into mass production at 3nm. Although SMIC was linked to a 5nm 5G chip for Huawei’s Mate 60 Pro, the achievement likely relied on workaround methods that aren't scalable.

The broader issue lies in the absence of cutting-edge fabrication tools. U.S. blacklists prevent TSMC and other advanced foundries from serving Chinese firms. Consequently, China must rely on SMIC’s less efficient production capacity, which struggles to produce high-performance GPUs at commercial yield rates.

Advanced Equipment: The ASML Bottleneck

The heart of China’s fabrication dilemma lies with lithography. The Netherlands’ ASML dominates the market for extreme ultraviolet (EUV) machines required for 3nm and smaller nodes. Due to U.S.-aligned restrictions, China is cut off from acquiring these machines.

Although Chinese firms like SiCarrier Technologies are attempting to develop domestic alternatives, progress is slow and uncertain. Deep ultraviolet (DUV) systems provide temporary relief, allowing SMIC to manufacture at 7nm, but yields are poor and likely unsustainable for meeting large-scale AI demand.

Rather than imitate EUV tech, Chinese strategists may pivot toward novel lithography technologies in an effort to leapfrog existing barriers—a high-risk, long-horizon approach.

Memory Chips: Momentum Amid Limitations

In contrast, China’s performance in memory production is comparatively stronger. High-bandwidth memory (HBM) is crucial for AI workloads, and while global leaders like SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron dominate the market, China’s ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) is beginning to fill the void.

CXMT, in collaboration with Tongfu Microelectronics, is reportedly developing early-stage HBM capabilities. While still nascent, this signals strategic alignment with the AI chip value chain. Nonetheless, South Korea's alignment with U.S. restrictions since late 2024 has made it harder for China to source world-class HBM chips, increasing the urgency for domestic innovation.

Parallel Progress and Bottlenecks

China’s AI chip ecosystem is evolving under pressure—driven by necessity and backed by massive state investment. Notably, advances in GPU design and memory suggest that targeted gains are achievable even under export curbs. Yet the inability to access EUV lithography and advanced fabrication tools leaves China structurally handicapped.

The broader implication is that China’s AI ambitions remain dependent on breakthroughs in manufacturing capacity. Until then, the ecosystem will rely on strategic workarounds, lower-yield production, and design improvements. While Beijing’s long-term play may yield autonomy, the current trajectory reveals a system under construction—progressing, but not yet competitive on a global scale.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading. Following any strategies or investment methods may lead to potential losses. The content on the site is provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, securities, strategy, or any other product is suitable for investing based on your own investment objectives and financial situation.

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

China–U.S. Trade War

A Tariff Truce That Offers Little Relief

President Trump’s declaration that the trade war with China is “done” and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s confirmation that tariffs will remain at a stacked 55% have done little to reassure U.S. logistics firms or importers. Although touted as a resolution, the fixed tariff level is being perceived not as a victory but as a long-term burden, especially by retail leaders and supply chain operators who say the structural damage has already taken place.

Executives like Alan Baer of OL USA stress that very few businesses can absorb such high tariffs without passing the cost to consumers. From cleaning product suppliers to apparel and footwear brands, the common thread is economic strain—rising prices, threatened jobs, and compressed margins. Steve Lamar of the American Apparel and Footwear Association went as far as calling the current tariff stack "not a win for America," citing negative impacts on everyday families and seasonal buying trends.

Lagging Imports and Freight Volumes Confirm Tariff Shock

The ripple effects are already visible across the logistics landscape. Import volumes from key trade partners such as China, South Korea, and Italy are down year-over-year, while Vietnam and India—part of the “China-plus-one” diversification trend—have gained momentum. Despite this shift, the overall U.S. import ecosystem remains unstable. Empty container backlogs at ports like Los Angeles and Long Beach point to inefficiencies and a glut of unprocessed cargo. Intermodal and truckload volumes are also down sharply—by 7.42% and 13.37%, respectively—suggesting that both rail and trucking sectors are losing revenue-generating cargo flows.

Even temporary truce measures—like the 90-day tariff pause—are yielding uneven results. While some importers have rushed to front-load goods such as Halloween decorations or automotive parts, these moves are viewed as short-term workarounds, not signs of recovery. Freight analyst Dean Croke warns that although summer activity may appear “busy,” carriers will likely spend the rest of the year “playing catch-up,” as the second quarter—a critical planning window—was effectively lost to policy volatility.

Trust in Policy Stability Has Eroded

Perhaps the most serious issue isn’t the tariff itself, but the breakdown of trust. Executives are concerned that trade policies can change “in a tweet,” creating an environment where long-term planning becomes nearly impossible. As CH Robinson’s Noah Hoffman highlighted, importers are now more focused on navigating uncertainty than seizing growth opportunities. The practice of carrying holiday inventory in mid-year only underscores how businesses have adapted to erratic regulatory changes.

This sentiment was echoed by Andrew Abbott of Atlantic Container Lines, who said EU trade volumes have surged temporarily as firms brace for potential tariff changes similar to the U.K. experience. The instability is also impacting shipping decisions—U.S. exporters face constrained access to containers, while ocean freight companies continue “blank sailings” that disrupt schedules and increase costs.

Tariff Fallout Extends Beyond China

Though the U.S.–China deal garners headlines, its effects are global. The container bottleneck, reduced vessel calls, and leaner port operations are being felt at major trade nodes like New York, Houston, and Los Angeles. Meanwhile, global manufacturing—especially out of Asia—has fallen to a 17-month low, according to GEP’s Supply Chain Volatility Index. This suggests that the combined effects of tariffs, economic uncertainty, and reduced consumer demand are putting the broader global trade ecosystem under sustained pressure.

Despite political declarations of resolution, the logistics and retail sectors indicate that the real economic cost of the trade war is only just unfolding. A 55% tariff may mark a policy ceiling, but for supply chains, it’s a floor of pain. The inflation shock may be delayed, but it is not dodged. Importers are adapting reactively, warehousing strategies have shifted from efficient to defensive, and domestic trucking and freight operators face demand suppression. Until the trade environment becomes both transparent and consistent, recovery in freight and retail will remain conditional—not on deals—but on stability.

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Soft Inflation Fails to Soothe Market Fears

The U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) for May rose just 0.1%, lower than the expected 0.2%. The annual inflation rate matched forecasts at 2.4%, while the core CPI, excluding food and energy, also undershot expectations at 2.8%. While the subdued inflation figures might typically encourage optimism and support for rate cuts, they instead reveal deeper uncertainty. Despite the benign numbers, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon warned that the U.S. economy could face deteriorating fundamentals, highlighting the exhaustion of pandemic-era fiscal and monetary supports.

President Trump declared a renewed framework for the U.S.-China trade relationship, stating that duties would total 55%—a combination of the pre-existing 30% blanket tariff and an added 25% on select products. However, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick attempted to temper speculation, emphasizing that no further changes to the tariff regime were expected. Nonetheless, markets remained cautious. The S&P 500 declined 0.27% and the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.5%, reflecting investor skepticism over whether such trade pronouncements will hold amid the administration's erratic approach to global economic policy.

Data Reliability and Policy Messaging in Question

Analysts like Seema Shah have voiced concerns that the CPI data might not yet reflect the full inflationary impact of tariffs. She warns that price shocks may take several months to manifest. The complexity of forecasting has deepened due to geopolitical noise and conflicting policy signals from the White House and the Federal Reserve. Vice President JD Vance even criticized the Fed’s stance, calling its reluctance to cut rates "monetary malpractice."

Amid this confusion, President Trump is reportedly considering a "shadow" Federal Reserve chair—someone who could influence the central bank’s policy tone in alignment with White House objectives, despite Jerome Powell’s current term lasting until 2026. This raises questions about the Fed's independence and the future direction of monetary policy.

Political Drama and Public Distractions

Adding to the volatility, high-profile public figures have continued to stir political and financial discourse. Elon Musk reversed his criticism of Trump, retracting recent controversial posts. Meanwhile, Trump signaled that Musk’s Starlink technology would remain in use at the White House, suggesting a political reconciliation that could influence market sentiment surrounding tech and defense sectors.

In parallel, broader macroeconomic trends are shifting global dynamics. ASEAN has committed to increasing the use of local currencies in trade and investment through its 2026–2030 Economic Community Strategic Plan. This push for de-dollarization reflects growing concerns about overdependence on the U.S. dollar amid geopolitical instability. The greenback’s share of global forex reserves has declined from over 70% in 2000 to 57.8% in 2024, underscoring the gradual erosion of dollar dominance and hinting at long-term structural changes in global finance.

Despite data that would traditionally be seen as positive—lower inflation and trade stabilization—market reaction remains tepid. Investors appear increasingly wary of trusting official statements or interpreting short-term numbers as indicators of sustained recovery. Uncertainty over tariffs, political interference in central banking, and shifting global monetary alliances signal that a deeper recalibration of both market expectations and economic leadership may be underway. In this volatile environment, cautious interpretation and strategic diversification are more essential than ever.

Source: CNBC

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

James Whitman

Economic

Political

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said he won’t rush into a trade deal with the US that would hurt the nation’s interests, although he’d welcome any progress made before an expected summit with US President Donald Trump.

“If there’s progress before I meet the president, that’s in and of itself good,” Ishiba told reporters in Tokyo Thursday. “But what’s important is to achieve an agreement that’s beneficial to both Japan and the US. We won’t compromise Japan’s interests by prioritizing a quick deal.”

Ishiba is expected to meet Trump on the sidelines of the Group of Seven leaders gathering in Canada starting Sunday, but Ishiba said the time and date for the bilateral hasn’t been set. The prime minister spoke following a gathering with opposition party leaders to discuss US tariffs. Collaborating beyond party lines is necessary to deal with what can be considered a national crisis, Ishiba said.

Ishiba’s top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa is expected to travel to North America later this week as Japan continues to aim for a reprieve from the US tariffs, which put the country at risk of a technical recession.

Source: Bloomberg

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Headline and Core Inflation Below Forecasts

According to the U.S. Department of Labor’s report released on June 11, CPI increased just 0.1% in May, below the 0.2% rise expected by economists surveyed by Dow Jones. On an annual basis, inflation stood at 2.4%, aligning with forecasts. More notably, the core CPI — which excludes volatile food and energy prices — also rose only 0.1% for the month and 2.8% year-over-year, both below projections of 0.3% and 2.9%, respectively.

This lower-than-expected inflation reading offers a short-term sense of relief to markets concerned about the inflationary impact of recent tariffs. However, energy prices fell 1% during the month, while food and shelter costs climbed 3% annually. Notably, egg prices fell 2.7% in May but remain 41.5% higher than a year ago, indicating lingering supply and pricing issues in key consumer goods.

A Calm Before the Storm?

Seema Shah, Chief Global Strategist at Principal Asset Management, urged caution in interpreting the data. She noted that while the current CPI report seems benign, it may not yet reflect the lagged effects of import tariffs. “It's too early to conclude that the price shock won’t materialize,” she warned, indicating that the CPI may understate the medium-term inflation threat posed by the trade war.

Trump’s recent escalation of trade measures — including reciprocal tariffs set to take effect in July — adds a layer of complexity to future price movements. While some sectors might benefit from domestic substitution, import-reliant industries could face mounting cost pressures, which would gradually trickle down into consumer prices.

Implications for the Federal Reserve

The Federal Reserve, which closely monitors core inflation as part of its dual mandate, now faces a policy crossroads. While May’s data supports a continued pause in rate hikes, uncertainty surrounding trade policy and inflation expectations could force the Fed to remain cautious. Market analysts now predict the Fed is unlikely to adjust rates until at least September, pending clearer insights into how tariffs affect pricing dynamics.

President Trump, however, has renewed his calls for rate cuts, arguing that a slower labor market and soft inflation warrant policy easing. Nonetheless, the Fed appears reluctant to react too quickly, given the risk of future inflation acceleration and global geopolitical instability.

Market Response: A Cautious Uptick

U.S. equity futures responded positively to the CPI data. The S&P 500 gained 0.2%, the Nasdaq 100 rose nearly 0.3%, and the Dow Jones advanced by 54 points (0.1%). Investors are pricing in a longer period of stable interest rates, hoping for a soft landing scenario that avoids both runaway inflation and an economic slowdown.

While the May inflation report offers tentative reassurance that tariffs haven’t yet sparked a price surge, economists remain wary of delayed effects. The disconnect between current data and forward-looking risks suggests that policymakers and investors should prepare for potential turbulence. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether this inflation lull is sustained or merely the calm before a tariff-driven storm.

Source: CNBC

To stay updated on all economic events of today, please check out our Economic calendar

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Political

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Kyiv’s Firm Line on Sovereignty

Amid prolonged conflict and stagnating negotiations, President Zelensky has made a decisive declaration: any discussions over Ukraine’s territorial integrity must happen directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Speaking to Hungary’s Valasz Online, Zelensky emphasized that Ukraine’s delegation in talks such as those held in Istanbul was never authorized to negotiate issues of sovereignty. Their mandate was strictly limited to humanitarian matters and ceasefires.

By framing territorial matters as a constitutional issue, Zelensky has drawn a clear red line — reinforcing that only the head of state holds the legitimate authority to negotiate over such fundamental national concerns. This move effectively sidelines lower-level talks and signals to international observers that only a top-level breakthrough can unlock real progress.

Russia’s Demands and Ukraine’s Refusal

Russia’s latest peace roadmap reportedly includes demands that Ukraine recognize the loss of five annexed regions, withdraw military forces, and adopt a neutral, demilitarized stance. Zelensky flatly rejected this, labeling it a “ultimatum,” and instead proposed an unconditional 30-day ceasefire as a prerequisite for any meaningful discussions.

Moscow, meanwhile, has continued aggressive military operations in northeastern and central Ukraine, particularly in Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk, maintaining pressure both militarily and diplomatically.

Strategic Signaling to Domestic and International Audiences

Zelensky’s refusal to negotiate territorial concessions — except with Putin himself — serves a dual purpose. Domestically, it reinforces his leadership's credibility among Ukrainian troops and citizens, who have endured years of war and displacement. Internationally, it reasserts Ukraine’s stance that sovereignty is non-negotiable and that any durable peace must be anchored in justice, not imposed outcomes.

His call for a “substantial international guarantee” before discussing final terms further reveals Ukraine’s wariness of bilateral deals without multilateral enforcement mechanisms. This approach reflects Kyiv’s broader diplomatic strategy of aligning closely with Western allies and securing long-term security assurances.

Stalemate Remains Without Presidential Breakthrough

While Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has hinted at the possibility of a Zelensky-Putin meeting if “concrete progress” is made, current military and diplomatic conditions offer little hope of such progress. Even with continued mediation by Turkey and the U.S., the absence of willingness from either side to budge on core issues ensures that talks remain at a standstill.

Zelensky’s latest remarks solidify Ukraine’s red lines: no backroom territorial deals, no concessions under pressure, and no negotiations with proxies. While Moscow maintains a hybrid strategy of military pressure and diplomatic coercion, Ukraine’s counter-strategy is to resist immediate settlement in favor of a longer-term resolution on its own terms. Without a major shift or direct top-level diplomacy, the deadlock is likely to persist.

Source: Reuters

Risk Warnings and Disclaimers

Add to Favorites

Gerik

Economic

Commodity

Safe-Haven Demand Drives Gold to New Highs

Gold surged for the second consecutive day, rising as much as 0.6% to around $3,373 an ounce—extending a 1% gain from the previous session. Investors flocked to the metal amid escalating risks in the Middle East and heightened anxiety about U.S. trade measures, reinforcing gold’s traditional role as a hedge in times of geopolitical and economic uncertainty.

The immediate catalyst was President Trump's announcement that the U.S. would send formal tariff notifications to its trading partners within one to two weeks, ahead of a July 9 deadline to reimpose higher duties. Although Trump confirmed a completed trade framework with China, tariffs between the world’s two largest economies will remain in place, keeping pressure on global trade stability.

Middle East Flashpoints Bolster Risk Aversion

Gold's momentum was further strengthened by geopolitical developments. The U.S. ordered partial embassy evacuations in Baghdad and authorized military families to leave the region amid fears of a potential confrontation with Iran. This came after Iran threatened to strike U.S. military installations should nuclear negotiations fail—a scenario that would directly threaten oil transit through the Strait of Hormuz and unsettle broader financial markets.

Such conditions historically spark elevated demand for gold, particularly as investors shift capital away from equities and other risk-sensitive assets toward safe-haven instruments.

Dollar Weakness and Central Bank Buying Add Tailwinds

The metal also benefited from a declining dollar, which fell 0.4% on Wednesday, making gold more attractive to holders of other currencies. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index remained flat early Thursday, suggesting continued weakness in the greenback.

Gold has gained 28% year-to-date, supported not only by market risk aversion but also by robust central bank demand. In the face of rising geopolitical fragmentation and mounting concerns over fiat currency credibility, central banks—especially in emerging markets—have been steadily increasing their gold reserves as a diversification strategy.

Broader Precious Metals Complex Follows Uptrend

Other precious metals joined the rally: silver, platinum, and palladium all saw gains. This broad-based movement reflects not only inflation hedging and geopolitical risk but also renewed interest in industrial metals amid hopes for improved global trade flows, particularly in light of the recent U.S.-China trade détente.

Looking ahead, the trajectory of gold will likely be shaped by how U.S. trade policies evolve, the stability of the Middle East, and any monetary policy responses from the Federal Reserve. With uncertainty dominating the global narrative—from Tehran to Beijing to Washington—the risk premium on gold is expected to remain elevated in the near term.

If inflation expectations rise due to persistent tariffs while geopolitical tensions intensify, gold could challenge new all-time highs. Conversely, any signs of de-escalation or coordinated diplomatic breakthroughs may cap further upside, though structural central bank support will likely continue to underpin demand.